lig/ml. The spectrum of cefmenoxime was similar to that of other, newer cephalosporins,
|
|
- Griselda Conley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ANTIMICROBLAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Dec. 1981, p Vol. 2, No /81/ $2./ Cefinenoxime (SCE-1365), a new Cephalosporin: In Vitro Activity, Comparison with Other Antimicrobial Agents, Beta- Lactamase Stability, and Disk Diffusion Testing with Tentative Interpretive Criteria PETER C. FUCHS,`* RONALD N. JONES,2 CLYDE THORNSBERRY,3 ARTHUR L. BARRY,4 E. HUGH GERLACH,5 AND HERBERT M. SOMMERS6 Department of Pathology, St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97225'; Department of Pathology, Kaiser Foundation Laboratory, Clackamas, Oregon 9715F; Antimicrobics Investigations Section, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 3333; Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, California ; Department of Laboratories, St. Francis Hospital, Wichita, Kansas ; and Department of Pathology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 661 Received 23 April 1981/Accepted 18 August 1981 The in vitro activity of cefmenoxime (SCE-1365) was evaluated in a multiphased collaborative investigation. Over 7,5 consecutive clinical isolates were tested in five laboratories, and greater than 9%o of the following organisms were inhibited by cefmenoxime at the following concentrations: Enterobacteriaceae and non-enterococcal streptococci,.125,ug/ml; Staphylococcus aureus, <2.,ug/ml; and nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli and Bacteroides fragilis group, s ug/ml. Both beta-lactamase-producing and -nonproducing Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were inhibited by cefmenoxime at s.3 lig/ml. The spectrum of cefmenoxime was similar to that of other, newer cephalosporins, particularly cefotaxime. A pronounced inoculum effect was found with some species upon increasing inocula from 15 to 17 colony-forming units per ml, resulting in an approximate eightfold increase in minximum inhibitory concentrations. Cefmenoxime was bactericidal when tested with inocula of 15 colonyforming units per ml, and mean differences between the minimum inhibitory concentration and the miniimum lethal concentration were less than one log2 dilution. No significant hydrolysis of cefmenoxime by five different beta-lactamases was detectable, and cefmenoxime exhibited marked inhibition of type I beta-lactamases. Regression and error rate-bounded analyses of results of disk diffusion and reference broth microdilution susceptibility tests were performed on 421 bacterial isolates, and the following tentative zone size breakpoints are proposed: 222 mm, susceptible; c14 mm, resistant; and 15 to 21 mm, moderately susceptible (indeterminate). These data and cross-resistance studies with other newer cephalosporins indicate marked similarity of in vitro activity within this group of drugs, particularly between cefmenoxime, moxalactam, and cefotaxime. Any one of these could serve as the representative for the disk diffusion testing of this group of drugs if comparable minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints were used for each drug. Cefmenoxime, formerly known as SCE-1365, over 7,5 recent clinical bacterial isolates, bacis a new cephalosporin structurally similar to tericidal activity against a select population of cefotaxime, differing from the latter by having a clinical isolates, effect of inoculum size on minimethyltetrazolthio group in the 3 position in- mum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), comparstead of an acetoxymethyl group. Cefmenoxime ison of in vitro activity of cefmenoxime with that is reported to have broad-spectrum activity of related cephalosporins and gentamicin against against both gram-positive and gram-negative selected groups of susceptible and resistant bacbacteria (2). In this report, we present the teria, evaluation of the effects of various betaresults of a collaborative in vitro evaluation of lactamases on cefmenoxime by hydrolysis and cefmenoxime which include: activity against susceptibility studies, study of beta-lactamase- 747
2 41 --Aw FUCHS ET AL. inhibitory activity of cefmenoxime, and comparison of cefinenoxime MIC with disk diffusion susceptibility results and regression analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Antibiotics. Cefmenoxime was provided by Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill., as standard powder., cefamandole, moxalactam, and gentamicin standard powders were obtained from Eli Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind. Other drug standard powders used were cefotaxime (Hoechst- Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Somerville, N.J.), cefoperazone (Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, N.Y.), cefoxitin (Merck, Sharp & Dohme, West Point, Pa.) and nitrocefin (Glaxo, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). Cefmenoxime 3-pg disks were provided by Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich. Organisms. The bacteria tested in phase 1 were consecutive clinical isolates encountered between 1 June and 31 July 198 in the clinical microbiology laboratories of Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Portland, Oreg.; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Ill.; St. Francis Hospital, Wichita, Kans.; St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oreg.; and University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif. In this phase there were 7,675 isolates, which are listed in Tables 1 through 3. The 11 selected clinical isolates in the bactericidal studies were contributed by the collaborating laboratories and selected to represent common pathogens. They included 1 srains each of: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, indole-positive Proteus spp., Providencia spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus faecalis. Beta-lactamase-positive and - negative Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from the stock collection at the Centers For Disease Control were similarly tested (see Table 8). Seven bacterial strains with well-documented specific beta-lactamases were utilized to evaluate cefmenoxime susceptibility to beta-lactamases (see Table 9) and beta-lactamase-inhibitory activity. Selected clinical isolates (436) obtained from the five laboratories named above and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, were utilized to establish disk criteria and to compare cefmenoxime MICs with those of six other beta-lactams and gentamicin. These include: 15 Acinetobacter spp., 21 Citrobacter app., 48 Enterobacter spp., 25 E. coli, 25 enterococci, 25 K. pneumoniae, 1 Morganella morganii, 25 P. mirabilis, 1 Proteus vulgaris, 29 Providencia app., 5 P. aeruginosa, 3 Pseudomonas spp., 25 S. marcescens, 48 S. aureus, 1 methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 2 Streptococcuspneumoniae, and 2 Strepcococcus pyogenes. Twenty-five N. meningitidis strains were included in the betalactam comparison, but not in the disk study. Aintimicrobial agent susceptibility testing. In the clinical isolate study, MICs were determined by the microdilution broth method at the Kaiser Foundation Hospital and at the University of California, Davis, Medical Center as previously described (8) and by agar dilution at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, St. Francis Hospital, and St. Vincent Hospital utilizing ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. the method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (13). These were conducted in Mueller-Hinton broth and agar (Difco), respectively. The concentrations tested by both methods were:.125,.5,, 2., 4.,, and. jg/ml. The inoculum size for the microdilution broth method was approximately 5 x 15 colony-forming units per ml, and that for agar dilution was approximately 14 colony-forming units per spot. In other phases of the study, the MICs and minimum lethal concentrations were determined by microdilution broth methods as previously described (2). Concentrations tested were serial twofold dilutions ranging from 256 to.8 jig/ ml. H. influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, and N. gonorrhoeae strains were tested at the Centers for Disase Control by broth microdilution with Mueller- Hinton broth supplemented with 5% peptic digest of blood (Fildes reagent) (H. influenzae and N. meningitidis) and by agar dilution using proteose peptone agar no. 3 supplemented with 1% hemoglobin (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and 1% Kellogg supplement (23) (N. gonorrhoeae). These procedures have been previously described in detail (1, 18). The susceptibility of anaerobes was tested in Wilkins- Chalgren broth in microdilution trays incubated for 48 h anaerobically at 35 C in GasPak jars (BBL) as previously described (1). The disk diffusion susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with standardized procedures (12). Disk zone size interpretive criteria were determined by both regression analyses according to the formula of least squares as adopted for computer computation and the error ratebounded method of Metzler and DeHaan (11). The beta-lactamase hydrolysis rates of cefmenoxime and three other cephalosporins were determined by the spectrophotometric method described by Neu (14) at 255- to 273-nm wavelengths; The reaction mixtures contained ml of.4 mm beta-lactam substrate in.5 M phosphate buffer (ph 7.) at 37 C and 1 to 2 id of crude enzyme preparation. Decrease in optical density was recorded for 3 min, and the hydrolysis rates in micromoles per minute were converted to percentage rates relative to that of nitrocefin. Inhibition of nitrocefin (87/312) hydrolysis was measured by spectrophotometer at 37 C at a wavelength of 482 nm (15). Reaction mixtures of nitrocefin and cefoxitin, and nitrocefin and cefotaxime were compared with nitrocefin and cefienoxime using crude enzyme preparation (inhibition studies). RESULTS Among the Enterobacteriaceae the susceptibility to cefmenoxime was much greater than susceptibility to cefamandole or cephalothin (Table 1). The MIC9o (concentration at which 9% of isolates are inhibited) of cefmnenoxime for Enterobacteriaceae was.125,ag/ml, whereas that of cefamandole was Ag/ml-a -fold difference. Compared with cephalothin, with an MICoo of >,ug/ml, the superiority was even greater. Over 99% of 4,768 Enterobacteriaceae isolates were inhibited by 5 ug of cefmenoxime per ml. Serratia, with an MICgo of 4,ug/ml,
3 VOL. 2, 1981 TABLE 1. CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY 749 Comparative susceptibility of 4,768 consecutive Enterobacteriaceae isolated at five institutions to cefmenoxime, cefamandole, and cephalothin % In- Organism n Drug MIC5a MIC9 at hii nml E. coli 2,73 Cefmenoxime.12 c.12 > Shigella spp. Klebsiella spp. Enterobacter spp. Serratia spp. Citrobacter spp. Salmonella spp. P. mirabilis P. vulgaris, Morganella spp., and Providencia spp. Miscellaneousb Total 76 Cefmenoxime 696 Cefmenoxime 468 Cefmenoxime 119 Cefmenoxime 13 Cefmenoxime 13 Cefmenoxime 379 Cefmenoxime 144 Cefmenoxime 15 Cefmenoxime 4,768 Cefmenoxime.12 : c > 5.12 > > c <.12 4.! > c.12 c < < > > 4. > > > > 2 -c > >.5 > c.12 > a MIC5o and MIC9, MICs at which 5 and 9%, respectively, of isolates are inhibited; expressed in micrograms per milliliter. b Includes: 2 Arizona hinshawii, 11 Hafnia alvei, and 2 Alkalescens-dispar group. 87 > >99 >99 88 > > was the genus least susceptible to cefmenoxime, but was still far more susceptible than to cefamandole (MIC9o, >,ug/ml). Other genera showing relative resistance to second-generation cephalosporins (cefamandole MIC9o, >,ig/ml) were Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Morganella, and Providencia, for which the cefmenoxime MIC9 values were,,.5, and.5 ug/ml respectively. The activity of cefmenoxime against nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, although somewhat greater than that of cefamandole and cephalothin (Table 2), was still poor. The mean MIC of cefmenoxime for P. aeruginosa and nonfermenters in general was > ug/ml. However, nearly one-fourth of P. aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas spp. were susceptible to cefme- and an additional 62 and noxime at 8,Ag/ml,
4 75 FUCHS ET AL. 42%, respectively, of those isolates fell in the moderately susceptible category of to,ug/ ml. Similarly, 67% of Acinetobacter anitratus TABLE 2. Comparative susceptibility of 772 consecutive nonenteric gram-negative bacilli isolated at five institutions to cefinenoxime % In- Organism Organmn IC5aMIC9 MICs n MCso hibited at c8 jig/nil Aeromonas hydrophila P. aeruginosa 5 > 23 Pseudomonas spp. 41 > 24 Acinetobacter cakcoace- 1 > 15 ticus subsp. anitratus Miscellaneousb Total 772 > a See footnote a of Table 1. bincludes: 6 Achromobacter xylosoxidans, 17 Acinetobacter cakoaceticus var. lwoffii, 1 Agrobacterium radiobacter, 5 Alcaligenes app., 11 Flavobacterium spp., 6 Moraxella spp., and 2 Pasteurella multocida. TABLE 3. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. were susceptible to cefmenoxime at c,ug/ml. Against gram-positive cocci the mean MIC of cefmenoxime was slightly greater than that of cefamandole and cephalothin. This was more apparent with the Micrococcaceae, among which a fourfold-greater MICOo was observed with cefmenoxime than with the streptococci; the differences were less apparent at the relatively high concentrations tested, e.g., lowest concentration =.125,ug/ml (compare Tables 3 and 6). The in vitro activity of cefmenoxime was compared with that of six other beta-lactams and gentamicin against 461 clinical strains contributed by the collaborating laboratories. This study showed marked similarity in the activity of cefmenoxime and the other third-generation cephalosporins, especially cefotaxime and moxalactam (Tables 4 through 6). The MICOgo values of these three drugs were within one dilution of each other against all genera of Enterobacteriaceae, except the Proteus-Morganella-Provi- Comparative susceptibility of2,135 consecutive gram-positive clinical isolates at five institutions to cefinenoxime, cefamandole, and cephalothin % In- Organism n Drug MIC5 MICg hibited at s8 JAg/ml S. aureus 99 Cefmenoxime 2..5 > >99 Staphylococcus epidermidis 4 Cefmenoxime Staphylococcus saprophyticus 2 Cefmenoxime Enterococci 539 Cefmenoxime > > 18 > 4 > 3 S. agalactiae 71 Cefmenoxime so.12 so.12 s.12 s.12 s.12 SO.12 Other Streptococcus spp.b 89 Cefinenoxime < so Miscellaneous, gram-positive bacteriac 26 Cefmenoxime.5 > > 81 Total 2,135 Cefmenoxime > asee footnote a of Table 1. b Includes: 7 S. pyogenes, 7 S. pneumoniae, 4 S. bovis, 28 S. viridans group, 14 beta-hemolytic streptococci not in groups A, B, or D, and 29 nonhemolytic streptococci. eincludes: 1 Micrococcus spp., 1 Listeria monocytogenes, 7 Corynebacterium spp., and 8 Bacillus spp.
5 VOL. 2, 1981 dencia group (Table 4). was 8 to times less active than cefmenoxime and cefotaxine against P. mirabilis, but was more active than the other drugs against the indole-positive species. Cefmenoxime had lowest MIC9o values against S. marcescens and Citrobacter spp. It also had greater activity than gentamicin against all Enterobacteriaceae, except that gentamicin was slightly superior against Enterobacter spp. had the best activity against P. aeruginosa (MIC9o, 8,ug/ml) and was slightly more active than gentamicin (Table 5). The majority of P. aeruginosa was moderately susceptible (MIC, to,g/ml) to cefmenoxime (78%), cefotaxime (76%), and moxalactam (66%). Other Pseudomonas spp. could be divided into two groups on the basis of their susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins: P. acidovorans and P. stutzeri were extremely susceptible, and the remaining species were resistant (Table 5). was the most active cephalosporin against A. anitratus (MlCo,,ug/ml), but was less active than the aminoglycoside, gentamicin (MIC9o, 4,ug/ml). and cefamandole were fourfold more active against S. aureus than were thirdgeneration drugs, but a marked increase in MICs of all drugs tested was seen with methicillinresistant strains (Table 6). Enterococci were not susceptible to any of these drugs, but cefoperazone and cefamandole had the best activity (MIC9,,ug/ml). Cefmenoxime and cefotaxime exhibited the best activity against S. pneumoniae (MIC9,.6 and.12,ug/ml) and S. pyogenes (MlC9o,.3 Ag/ml). and cefoxitin were the least active of all cephalosporins tested against these two species (MICso, and 2.,ug/ml). N. meningitidis was extremely susceptible to all cephalosporins, with the third-generation drugs being somewhat more active (MIC9o, '.8 yig/ml) than the earlier compounds (MICgo,.125,ug/ml). When tested against 48 anaerobic isolates, cefmenoxime was intermediate among the other cephalosporins compared (Table 7). The activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group (44% with MIC of c8,ug/ml) was significantly greater than that of cefamandole, but less than that of cefotaxime, moxalactam, and cefoxitin. No one drug was consistently superior against all groups of anaerobes, e.g., moxalactam was most active against B. fragilis and gram-positive cocci; cefoxitin was most active against other Bacteroides spp.; and cefamandole was most active against Clostridium spp. The effect of inoculum concentration on the MICs of cefmenoxime was tested against 11 selected isolates from 11 species. There was a relatively small increase in MICs between the CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY 751 use of inocula of 15 versus 13 colony-forming units per ml (less than 1 log2 difference in mean MICs). By contrast, increasing the inoculum from 15 to 17 colony-forming units per ml produced a substantial increase in MICs (2 to 5 log2 dilution steps). The greatest increases occurred with Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter spp. Cefmenoxime demonstrated excellent bactericidal activity against these same isolates with an inoculum of 15 colony-forming units per ml. The minimum lethal concentration exceeded the MIC by less than.5 log2, and above 4 utg/ml the cefmenoxime miniimum lethal concentration equalled the MIC. Cefmenoxime and other third-generation cephalosporins were most active against H. in-. fluenzae and N. gonorrhoeae; this potency was not appreciably affected by beta-lactamase production (Table 8). The resistance of cefmenoxiine to beta-lactamases was further tested by determining the hydrolysis rates of cefmenoxime and other cephalosporins by a series of wellcharacterized beta-lactamases by spectrophotometric methods (14). Cefmenoxime was generally refractory to hydrolysis by all tested enzymes (Table 9). The least resistance to hydrolysis occurred with type IV beta-lactamase produced by a Klebsiella spp., with a relative hydrolysis rate (compared with nitrocefin) of only 2%. Furthermore, cefmenoximne markedly inhibited the hydrolysis of nitrocefin by type I beta-lactamase, but had little or no inhibitory effect on hydrolysis by other enzyme types (Fig. 1). This inhibitory spectrum was comparable to that of cefoxitin and cefotaximne. The comparison of cefmenoxime MICs and zone sizes by disk diffusion testing is summarized in the scattergram in Fig. 2. The regression line illustrated is based on values in the MIC range of 2 to 256,ug/ml. Based on the limited cefmenoxime pharnacological data currently available (19), MIC breakpoints for susceptible, resistant, and moderately susceptible (indeterminate) were selected as c8, >, and to,ig/ml, respectively. With these MIC breakpoints, regression analysis yielded corresponding zone size breakpoints of -22 mm for susceptible, c14 mm for resistant, and 15 to 21 mm for the moderately susceptible range. Error ratebounded analysis likewise yielded a susceptible breakpoint for -22 mm, at which point there is a.5% very major error rate (false-susceptible) and a 1.2% major error rate (false-resistant). However, with the introduction of the indeterminate category, these major and very major errors are reduced to minor errors. These categories effectively segregated the major bacterial populations such that most enterococci are resistant, nonfermenters are moderately suscepti-
6 TABLE 4. E. coli K. pneumoniae Comparative susceptibility of 218 Enterobacteriaceae to cefmenoxime, six other cephalosporins, and gentamicin Enterobacter Spp.b S. marcescens Organism % Inn Drug MICr5a MIC9a hibited ml 25 Cefmenoxime Cefmenoxime Cefmenoxime Cefmenoxime Citrobacter spp.c 21 Cefmenoxime P. mirabilis 25 Cefmenoxime Morganella, Providencia, and Proteus spp.d 49 Cefmenoxime a See footnote a of Table 1. bincludes: 21 E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, 9 E. agglomerans, and 2 E. gergoviae. 'Includes: 1 C. diversus and 11 C. freundii. d Includes: 1 P. vulgaris, 1 Providencia rettgeri, 19 P. stuartii, and 1 M. morganii. 752
7 VOL. 2, 1981 TABLE 5. CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY 753 Comparative susceptibility ofgram-negative nonfermenters to cefmnenoxime, six other cephalosporis, and gentamicin % In- Organism n Drug MIC5a MIC"a hibited -_s jagl Organism MICgo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ml A. calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus 15 Cefmenoxime P. aeruginosa Pseudomonas spp. (group 1)b Pseudomonas spp. (group 2)C 5 Cefmenoxime 12 Cefmenoxime 18 Cefmenoxime See footnote a of Table 1. b Includes: 3 P. acidovorans and 9 P. stutzeri. 'Includes: 4 P. cepacia, 3 P. maltophilia, 6 P. fluorescens, and 5 P. putida. ble, and Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus are susceptible (Fig. 3). Furthermore, these categories segregated the organisms in the phase 1 clinical study (Fig. 3C) in a fashion similar to that of the organisms in the regression analysis study (Fig. 3B)-thus demonstrating that the latter population was representative of current clinical isolates. MICs of cefmenoxime, cefotaxime, and moxalactam against the same organisms used for the disk study showed no cross-resistance between cefmenoxime and cefotaxime and less than 1% cross-resistance with moxalactam by using the MIC breakpoints described above (Table 1). Of 421 isolates tested, 5 were susceptible to cefotaxine (MIC, c8,ug/ml) of which 318 were susceptible, 7 were moderately susceptible > (MIC, to Ag/ml), and none were resistant (MIC, > ug/ml) to cefmenoxime. Only one of these was resistant to moxalactam. There were 38 strains resistant to cefotaxine, of which 33 were also resistant to cefinenoxime and 5 were moderately susceptible to this drug. Three of these isolates were susceptible to moxalactam; all three were strains of Pseudomonas maltophilia. DISCUSSION The in vitro activity of cefmenoxime in this report (Tables 1 through 6), as well as that of a previous report (2), was considerably greater than that of cephalothin and cefamandole, and was remarkably similar to the activity reported for cefotaxime (1, 6, 7) and moxalactam (1, 3, 9,
8 TABLE 6. _ Comparative susceptibility ofgram-positive cocci and N. meningitidis to cefmenoxime, six other cephalosporins, and gentamicin % In- Organism n Drug MICwa MIC,b athibited lg/ ml 754 FUCHS ET AL. ANTimICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. S. aureus (methicillin susceptible) S. aureus (methicillin resistant) S. faecalis S. pneumoniae S. pyogenes N. meningitidis a See footnote a of Table Cefmenoxime 1 Cefmenoxime 25 Cefmenoxime 2 Cefmenoxime 2 Cefmenoxime 25 Cefmenoxime > O s SO so.12 so >256 > SO so.12 s.8 s s.12 s.12 so , 22). Whereas the Enterobacteriaceae, nonenterococcal streptococci, and S. aureus were highly susceptible to cefmenoxime, the majority of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. required to jig/ml for inhibition. Conversely, these two species constituted the bulk of all organisms in this moderately susceptible range (Fig. 3). Because these levels of cefmenoxime in serum
9 VOL. 2, 1981 are easily exceeded (19), and because this MIC range for cefotaxime (6) and moxalactam (3) is considered indeterminate or moderately susceptible, the same is tentatively applied to cefmenoxime. That this category includes primarily P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. may be significant in clinical evaluations when the efficacy of the moderately s(iceptible category concept is tested. Despite the considerable similarity of in vitro TABLE 7. Comparative susceptibility of 48 anaerobic isolates to cefnenoxime, cefamandole, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and cefoxitin % In- Organism n Drug MICsoa MICra MIC9 at d8 CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY 755 MI9ahibited jg/ml B. fragilis Cefmenoxime 44 group b Bacteroides 18 Cefmenoxime spp Clostridium 6 Cefmenoxime spp.d Gram-positive 8 Cefmenoxime.5 4. cocci a See footnote a of Table 1. 'Includes: 11 B. fragilis, 2 B. distasonis, 2 B. ovatus, and 1 B. thetaiotaomicron. c Includes: 3 B. melaninogenicus and 15 Bacteroides spp. NOS. d Includes: 2 C. difficile, 1 C. perfringens, and 3 Clostridium spp. NOS. activity of these third-generation cephalosporins, preliminary pharmacological data in experimental animals suggest some potential advantages of cefmenoxime (19). Although plasma levels of cefmenoxime and cefotaxime in animals were comparable, cefmenoxime tissue levels were significantly higher than those of cefotaxime, and the half-life in both plasma and tissue was greater for cefmenoxime (19). Furthermore, cefmenoxime showed greater activity than ce- TABLE 8. Comparative MICs of cefmenoxime and other cephalosporins against beta-lactamasenegative and -positive H. influenzae and N. gonorrhoeae Organism n Drug MIC5a MIC9a H. influenzae (beta- 2 Cefmenoxime c.8.3 lactamase negative) < co H. influenzae (beta- 2 Cefmenoxime c.8.3 lactamase positive) > > N. gonorrhoeae 22 Cefmenoxime.8.3 (beta-lactamase S.8.3 negative) N. gonorrhoeae 26 Cefmenoxime (Beta-lactamase 5.8 s.8 positive) a See footnote a of Table 1. TABLE 9. Comparison of beta-lactamase hydrolysis of cefmenoxime with that of other cephalosporins Relative rate of hydrolysis in % (MIC)b Organism Oae Type of enzyme' Cepha epha- Cefmenoxime loridine Enterobacter sp. I, inducible 15.3 () <.1 () <.1 () E. coli III, TEM () < (.6) < (.6) E. coli III, TEM 2 2 () < (.6) < (.12) Klebsiella ap. IV, inducible () 17 (2.) 2 (4.) Bacillus cereus 87 1 (ND)C <.1 (ND) <.1 (ND) a Enzyme classifications from references and 17. b The hydrolysis rates in micromoles per minute were converted to percentage relative rates compared with that of labile substrate nitrocefin (87/312). The MICs by the reference broth microdilution procedure are in parentheses. c ND, Not determined.
10 756 FUCHS ET AL. LU I- -,.75 > w -5 z -25 LA A CEFMENOXIME (PM) FIG. 1. Inhibition of hydrolysis of nitrocefin by cefmnenoximne. Symbols:, E. cloacae type I;- A, E. coli type IIa;, E. coli type 111b; and A, Kiebsiella sp. type IV. 512 "Iin.4 mj x,l U 3 15 N. N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \"I" N~~~~ N _ I ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. fotaxime in mice infected with several Enterobacteriaceae spp. (2). In view of the cefmenoxime structural similarity to cefotaxime at the 7 position, it is not surprising to find cefmenoxime to be comparably resistant to inactivation by bacterial beta-lactamases. When hydrolysis rates of cefmenoxime and other cephalosporins by several specific types of beta-lactamases were determined (Table 9), cefotaxime, as previously reported (22), and cefmenoximne were virtually unaffected by the enzymes tested; the MICs for the corresponding enzyme-producing bacteria were significantly lower than those of cefamandole, which was much more susceptible to these enzymes. Because of its high resistance to beta-lactamases, cefmenoxime was tested for its ability to inhibit beta-lactamase hydrolysis of a susceptible beta-lactam substrate, in this case, nitrocefin. The previously reported inhibitory spectrum of cefoxitin and cefotaxime (4, 5) was confirmed, and the spectrum of cefmenoxime was found to be essentially the same, i.e., all effectively inhibit Richmond and Sykes type I beta-lactamases, but not types II, III, IV or V. and 1* I * 4' sx t X I N A N* "5,13 ZONE SIZE IN MM FIG. 2. Correlation between cefmenoxime MICs and zone diameters, using 3-ptg cefmenoxime disks. Horizontal lines represent proposed MIC resistant (upper) and susceptible (lowei) breakpoints. Vertical lines represent the proposed tentative zone size susceptible (right) and resistant (left) breakpoints. The long diagonal line represents standard regression line using all on-scale data: slope = -.458, y intercept (expressed as log2), and correlation coefficient = The short diagonal line represents regression line using on-scale values with MIC 2 pg/ml: slope = , y intercept = 8.8 (expressed as log2), and correlation coefficient = -.91.
11 VOL. 2, 1981 I I 1, I "1 ii /l / 1/ II 68 9n WU29,31-34 F35 ZONE SIZES IN l %12 1A LUC L5 54.sr'Gim. %I, 'I I I \ I I i %. ' I Id "- I: WC N FIG. 3. Cefmenoxime zone size (A) and MlrC (B) distribution of isolates of major organism groups used in regression analysis, and clinical isolate study (C). Symbols: (---) S. aureus, (...) S. faecalis, (---a-) nonfermenters, ( ) Enterobacteriaceae. cefmenoxime showed slight inhibition of type III-b beta-lactamase compared with cefotaxime, which exhibited none. Since moxalactam has the same inhibitory spectrum as cefotaxime (5), this is an additional property shared by the three third-generation drugs. Resistance of cefmenoxime, cefotaxime, and moxalactam to the beta-lactamases of H. influ- CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY 757 enzae and N. gonorrhoeae is documented in Table 8, which shows that the MICs for betalactamase-positive and -negative strains are essentially the same. By contrast, cefamandole A showed considerable susceptibility to the betalactamase of H. influenzae, but not to that of N. gonorrhoeae. The slightly greater resistance of beta-lactamase-negative N. gonorrhoeae to the cephalosporins shown in Table 8 is an interesting phenomenon partially explained by the inclusion in this group of seven strains exhibiting increased resistance to several other antibiotics (possible cell membrane permeability mutants). The activity of cefmenoxime was most comparable to that of cefotaxime or moxalactam, which were shown to be the most active cephalosporins among 13 beta-lactam antibiotics previously tested against both beta-lactamase-positive and -negative H. influenzae and N. gonorrhoeae (1). The extremely low MICs of cefinenoxime and the third-generation cephalosporins against H. influenzae, N. meningitidis, and N. gonorrhoeae plus their resistance to the beta-lactamases produced by two of these species should qualify these drugs for clinical trials against infection due to these microbes. The disk diffusion zone sizes versus MIC values of cefmenoxime (Fig. 2) demonstrate a marked accentuation of the parabolic distribution of endpoints below an MIC of 1,ug/ml. Standard regression analysis utilizing all onc scale data yields a line with a rather steep slope of which crosses the 8-,ug/ml line at the 19-mm zone size. A 219-mm susceptible breakpoint would yield a 7.1% false-susceptible (very major error) rate, which is unacceptable. On the other hand, when regression analysis is performed on those values along the straighter segment of the regression curve which includes three MIC values above and below the MiC TABLE 1. Cross-resistance analysis of cefotaxime versus cefmenoxime and moxalactam with organisms used to establish disk criteria MICs (yg/ Drug MIC (tg/ ml) s8 to > Cefmenoxime c8 318c > 1 33 c > a Numbers in table represent numbers of isolates. A total of 421 isolates were tested.
12 758 FUCHS ET AL. breakpoints (i.e., 2 to 256,ug/ml), the regression line then has a slope of and crosses the 8-,ug/ml level at 21.5 mm. This susceptible breakpoint of a22 mm is also supported by error rate-bounded analysis, which yields an acceptable.5% very major error rate. By both analytical methods, the resistant zone size breakpoint was determined to be c14 mm. The major error (false-resistant) rate was 2.1% which is less than the 5% acceptable limit. All very major and major errors became minor errors when the moderately susceptible (indeterminate) ranges (MICs of to,ug/ml and zone sizes of 15 to 21 mm) were applied, since all values 222 mm with MICs >8,ug/ml fell in the indeterminate MIC range, as did all values s14 mm with MICs s,ug/ml. The regression data and analysis are very similar to those reported for cefotaxime (6) and moxalactam (3). In fact, the suggested zone size breakpoints for cefotaxime (c14 mm, resistant; 223 mm, susceptible) differ by only 1 mm at the susceptible breakpoint from that suggested herein for cefmenoxime. With all three drugs the proportions of different bacterial species in the three susceptibility categories were similar. These features, together with the data from the cross-resistance studies, indicate that susceptibility and resistance to cefmenoxime are predictable from the results of disk diffusion susceptibility testing of cefotsxime or moxalactam. It would appear that any one of these drugs could serve successfully as the class representative for disk susceptibility testing to predict susceptibility to this grouping of third-generation cephalosporins. This assumes, of course, that the human pharmacokinetics, usual dosage regimens, and clinical efficacy against organisms in the categories of susceptible and moderately susceptible will prove to be comparable; these studies are yet to be completed for cefmenoxime. LITERATURE CIE 1. Baker, C. N., C. Thornsberry, and R. N. Jones In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam (LY127935), azlocillin, mezlocillin, and other,b-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including 6-lactamase producing strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 17: Barry, A. L, C. Thornsberry, R. N. Jones, P. C. Fuchs, T. L Gavan, and E. H. Gerlach Cefuroxime, an in vitro comparison with six other cephalosporins. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 7(Suppl. 9): Barry, A. L, C. Thornsberry, R. N. Jones, and E. H. Gerlach Tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with moxalactam (LY127935). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18: Fu, K. P., and H. C. Neu Beta-lactamase stability of HR 756, a novel cephalosporin, compared to that of cefuroxime and cefoxitin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 14:2-6. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. 5. Fu, K. P., and H. C. Neu The comparative betalactamase resistance and inhibitory activity of 1-oxacephalosporin, cefoxitin and cefotaxime. J. Antibiot. : Fuchs, P. C., A. L Barry, C. Thornsberry, R. N. Jones, T. L. Gavan, E. H. Gerlach, and H. M. Sommers : in vitro activity and tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18: Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., W. Brumfitt, and A. V. Reynolds (HR 756): a new cephalosporin with exceptional broad spectrum activity in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 4: Jones, R. N., P. C. Fuchs, T. L Gavan, E. H. Gerlach, A. L Barry, and C. Thornsberry Cefuroxime, a new parenteral cephalosporin: collaborative in vitro susceptibility comparison with cephalothin against 5,887 clinical bacterial isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12: Jones, R. N., P. C. Fuchs, H. M. Sommers, T. L. Gavan, A. L Barry, and E. H. Gerlach (LY127935), a new semisynthetic 1-oxa-betalactam antibiotic with remarkable antimicrobial activity: in vitro comparison with cefamandole and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 17: Jones, R. N., P. C. Fuchs, C. Thornsberry, and N. Rhodes Antimicrobial susceptibility tests for anaerobic bacteria. Comparison of Wilkin-Chalgren agar reference method and a microdilution method, and determination of stability of antimicrobics frozen in broth. Curr. Microbiol. 1: Metzler, C. M., and R. M. DeHaan Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations. J. Infect. Dis. 13: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests. 1975, Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests, approved standard, M2-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. 13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee for Anthimcrobial Susceptibility Tests Standard methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria which grow aerobically, proposed standards, M7-P. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. 14. Neu, H. C Antibiotic inactivating enzymes and bacterial resistance, p In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore. 15. O'Callaghan, C. H., A. Morris, S. ML Kirby, and A. H Shingler Novel method for detection of betalactmases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1: Richmond, M. HL, and R. B. Sykes The betalactamases of gram-negative bacteria and their possible physiological role. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 9: Syke8, R. B., and M. Matthew The beta-lactamases of gram-negative bacteria and their role in resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2: Thornsberry, C., C. N. Baker, and R. N. Jones In vitro antimicrobiol activity of piperacillin and seven other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae including betalactamase producing strains. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 5: Tsuchiya, K., Y. Kita, I. Yamaaki, K Kondo, Y. Noji, and T. Fugono Absorption, distribution and excretion of cefmenoxime (SCE-1365), a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin, in mice, rats, rabbits and dogs. J. Antibiot. 33: Tsuchiya, K., M. Kondo, M. Kida, M. Nakao, T. Iwahi,
13 VOL. 2, 1981 T. Nishi, Y. Noji, M. Takeuchi, and Y. Nozaki Cefmenoxime (SCE-1365), a novel broad spectrum cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 19: VanLanduyt, H. W., and M. Pyckavet In vitro activity of cefotaxime against cephalothin-resistant clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. : CEFMENOXIME EVALUATION AND DISK STUDY Watanakunakorn, C., and C. Glotzbecker Comparative in vitro activity of LY (659-S), seven cephalosporins, cefoxitin and cefotaxime. J. Antibiot. : White, L A., and D. S. Kellogg, Jr Neisseria gonorrhoeae identification in direct smears by a fluorescent antibody-counterstain method. Appl. Microbiol. 13:
Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing
Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing Disks versus Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations with Eleven Cephalosporins ARTHUR L. BARRY, PH.D., CLYDE THORNSBERRY, PH.D., RONALD N.
More informationIn Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Feb. 993, p. 39-353 0066-0/93/0039-05$0.00/0 Copyright 993, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 37, No. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone
More information4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases
4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases Classification Forth generation: Cefclidine, cefepime (Maxipime),cefluprenam, cefoselis,cefozopran, cefpirome
More informationEvaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov. 1985, p. 793-798 0095-1137/85/110793-06$02.00/0 Copyright 1985, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 22, No. 5 Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility
More informationwith Other Orally Administered Drugs
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Aug. 1983, p. 209-215 0066-4804/83/080209-07$00/0 Copyright C 1983, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 24, No. 2 In Vitro Evaluation of Three New Macrolide Antimicrobial
More informationagainst Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Feb. 993, p. 366-370 Vol. 37, No. 0066-0/93/00366-05$0.00/0 Copyright 993, American Society for Microbiology In Vitro Activity of CP-99,9, a New Fluoroquinolone,
More informationEvaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Mar. 1987, p. 546-550 0095-1137/87/030546-05$02.00/0 Copyright C 1987, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 25, No. 3 Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility
More informationAberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015
Aberdeen Hospital Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated s For 2015 Services Laboratory Microbiology Department Aberdeen Hospital Nova Scotia Health Authority 835 East River Road New
More informationwith Stability to Dehydropeptidase I
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Feb. 99, p. 5- Vol. 33, No. 0066-0/9/005-0$0.00/0 Copyright C 99, American Society for Microbiology In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of, a Carbapenem Antibiotic with
More informationHelp with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST
Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST This document sets out the main differences between the BSAC and EUCAST disc diffusion methods with specific emphasis on preparation prior to
More information2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
2012 ANTIBIOGRAM Central Zone Former DTHR Sites Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Medically Relevant Pathogens Based on Gram Morphology Gram-negative Bacilli Lactose Fermenters Non-lactose
More informationAntibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting
Antibiotic Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting Any substance of natural, synthetic or semisynthetic origin which at low concentrations kills or inhibits the growth of bacteria
More informationDisk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin
ANTIMICROBiAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHEMRAPY, Jan. 1974, p. 63-67 Copyright i 1974 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 5, No. 1 Printed in U.SA. Disk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin
More informationC&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015
C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 213 December 215 Division of Microbiology, Virology & Infection Control Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Contents Comments and Limitations...
More informationIn Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin
ANTIMICROBIAL AGzNTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Jan. 1977, p. 126-131 Copyright X 1977 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 11, No. 1 Printed in U.S.A. In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin
More informationEvaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals
J Vet Diagn Invest :164 168 (1998) Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals Susannah K. Hubert, Phouc Dinh Nguyen, Robert D. Walker Abstract.
More informationSusceptibility Tests for Methicillin-Resistant (Heteroresistant) Staphylococci
JOURNAL OF CLNCAL MCROBOLOGY, Apr. 1984, p. 482-488 95-1137/84/4482-7$2./ Copyright C) 1984, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 19, No. 4 New Recommendations for Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility
More informationTable 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities. Gram-positive cocci: Staphylococcus aureus: *Resistance to penicillin is almost universal. Resistance
More informationAminothiazolyl oc-methoxyimino Cephalosporin
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, June 1984, p. 710-718 0066-4804/84/060710-09$00/0 Copyright 1984, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 25, No. 6 In Vitro Evaluation of, a New Wide-Spectrum Aminothiazolyl
More information2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report
Citrobacter freundii Enterobacter aerogenes Enterobacter cloacae Escherichia coli Haemophilus influenzenza Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus mirabilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Serratia marcescens
More informationAntimicrobial susceptibility
Antimicrobial susceptibility PATTERNS Microbiology Department Canterbury ealth Laboratories and Clinical Pharmacology Department Canterbury District ealth Board March 2011 Contents Preface... Page 1 ANTIMICROBIAL
More informationINFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER
INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER University of Minnesota Health University of Minnesota Medical Center University of Minnesota Masonic Children s Hospital May 2017 Printed herein are
More informationUniversity, New York, New York Received for publication 7 May was measured by the broth dilution method as previously
ANTmIcaoBIAL AGuNTS AND CHUMTrHURAPY, Sept. 1976, p. 526-534 Copyright C 1976 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 10, No. 3 Printed in U.S.A. In Vitro Study of Netilmicin Compared with Other Aminoglycosides
More informationAntibacterial Spectrum
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Sept. 1992, p. 1894-1901 0066-4804/92/091894-08$02.00/0 Copyright 1992, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 36, No. 9 In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities
More information2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose
2016 Antibiogram Central Zone Alberta Health Services including Red Deer Regional Hospital St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose Introduction This antibiogram is a cumulative report of the antimicrobial susceptibility
More informationBacteriological Characterization
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Sept. 1978, p. 414-419 0066-4804/78/0014-0414$02.00/O Copyright X) 1978 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 14, No. 3 Printed in U.S.A. CP-45,899, a Beta-Lactamase
More informationavailable. and P. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin by standardized disk testing (1) in the Microbiology Laboratory
ANTimICROBIAL AGENTh AND CHEMOTHERAPY, OCt. 1976, p. 677-681 Copyright 1976 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 10, No. 4 Printed in U.S.A. In Vitro Susceptibility of Gentamicin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
More informationLab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.
Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method. OBJECTIVES 1. Compare the antimicrobial capabilities of different antibiotics. 2. Compare effectiveness of with different types of bacteria.
More informationPDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/26062
More information2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services
2015 Antibiogram Red Deer Regional Hospital Central Zone Alberta Health Services Introduction. This antibiogram is a cumulative report of the antimicrobial susceptibility rates of common microbial pathogens
More informationComparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae
ANTIMICROBIAL AGzNTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Oct. 1976, P. 592-597 Copyright 1976 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 1, No. 4 Printed in U.S.A. Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and
More information2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report
Fairview Northland Medical Center and Elk River, Milaca, Princeton and Zimmerman Clinics 2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS 2016 Gram-Negative Non-Urine The number of isolates
More information2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose
2017 Antibiogram Central Zone Alberta Health Services including Red Deer Regional Hospital St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose Introduction This antibiogram is a cumulative report of the antimicrobial susceptibility
More informationBactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21
www.wslhpt.org 2601 Agriculture Drive Madison, WI 53718 (800) 462-5261 (608) 265-1111 2015-BactiR Reg3 Shipment Date: September 14, 2015 Questions or comments should be directed to Amanda Weiss at 800-462-5261
More information2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital
2009 ANTIBIOGRAM University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital Division of Medical Microbiology Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction.....
More information2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital
2010 ANTIBIOGRAM University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital Medical Microbiology Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Table of Contents Page Introduction..... 2 Antibiogram
More informationln-vitro activity of newer quinolones against aerobic bacteria
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (96) 7, Suppl. B, 9-39 ln-vitro activity of newer quinolones against aerobic bacteria R. Anckenthaler, M. Michea-Hamzehponr and J. C. Pectere Laboratoire Central de
More informationSynergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (78) 4, 53-543 Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci Chatrchal Watanakunakoni and Cheryl Glotzbecker Infectious
More informationEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Routine and extended internal quality control for MIC determination and disk diffusion as recommended by EUCAST Version 8.0, valid from 018-01-01
More informationCiprofloxacin, Enoxacin, and Ofloxacin against Aerobic and
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Aug. 1988, p. 1143-1148 Vol., No. 8 0066-4804/88/081143-06$00/0 Copyright 1988, American Society for Microbiology Comparative Activities of, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic
More informationThe β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018
The β- Lactam Antibiotics Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018 Penicillins. Cephalosporins. Carbapenems. Monobactams. The β- Lactam Antibiotics 2 3 How
More informationTel: Fax:
CONCISE COMMUNICATION Bactericidal activity and synergy studies of BAL,a novel pyrrolidinone--ylidenemethyl cephem,tested against streptococci, enterococci and methicillin-resistant staphylococci L. M.
More informationJanuary 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1
January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1. and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Testing Conditions Medium: diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) roth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
More informationPharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, JUlY 1975, p. 86-90 Copyright 0 1975 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 8, No. 1 Printed in U.SA. Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates JORGE B.
More informationThe Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards
The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards Janet A. Hindler, MCLS, MT(ASCP) UCLA Health System Los Angeles, California, USA jhindler@ucla.edu 1 Learning Objectives Describe information
More informationmicrobiology testing services
microbiology testing services You already know Spectra Laboratories for a wide array of dialysis-related testing services. Now get to know us for your microbiology needs. As the leading provider of renal-specific
More informationGuidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System
Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System Purpose The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), passed in 1988, establishes quality standards for all laboratory
More informationIn Vitro Activity of Piperacillin, a New Semisynthetic Penicillin with an Unusually Broad Spectrum of Activity
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, March 1978, p. 349-357 66-484/8/133-349$2./ Copyright 1978 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 13, No. 3 Printed in U.S.A. In Vitro Activity of Piperacillin, a
More informationAn evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1991) 27, Suppl. C, 1-7 An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage J. J. Muscato",
More informationQUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.) Description: Greenish gray colonies with some beta-hemolysis around each colony on blood agar (BAP),
More informationIV Antibiotics for Lyme Disease (Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime sodium, Doxycycline, Penicillin G potassium)
Federal Employee Program 1310 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 202.942.1000 Fax 202.942.1125 5.01.15 Subject: IV Antibiotics Lyme Disease Page: 1 of 9 Last Review Date: November 30, 2018 IV Antibiotics
More informationLeveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship
Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship Presented by: Andrew Martinez MLS(ASCP), MT(AMT), MBA Alaska Native Medical Center Microbiology Supervisor Maniilaq Health Center
More informationcoverage. The purpose of this study was to compare the susceptibility of 297 strains of anaerobic and a new broad-spectrum semisynthetic
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Nov. 1978, p. 643-649 0066-4804/78/0014-0643$02.00/0 Copyright 1978 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 14, No. 5 Printed in U.S.A. Susceptibility of the Anaerobic
More informationAntimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics Susan E. Sharp, Ph.D., DABMM, FAAM Director, Airport Way Regional Laboratory Director, Regional Microbiology and Molecular Infectious Diseases Laboratories
More information2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)
Key words I μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ II Fig. 1. Microdilution plate. The dilution step of the antimicrobial agent is prepared in the -well microplate. Serial twofold dilution were prepared according
More informationAntimicrobial Susceptibility in Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Are
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Nov. 1989, p. 1855-1859 0066-4804/89/111855-05$02.00/0 Copyright 1989, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 33, No. 11 Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Gram-Negative
More informationIn Vitro Activity of DR-3355, an Optically Active Ofloxacin
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Sept. 1988, p. 1336-1340 0066-4804/88/091336-05$02.00/0 Copyright C 1988, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 32, No. 9 In Vitro Activity of, an Optically Active
More informationDoripenem: A new carbapenem antibiotic a review of comparative antimicrobial and bactericidal activities
REVIEW Doripenem: A new carbapenem antibiotic a review of comparative antimicrobial and bactericidal activities Fiona Walsh Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
More informationEXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING
EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING CHN61: EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING 1.1 Introduction A common mechanism of bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics is the production
More informationMechanism of Chloramphenicol-Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, June 1975, p. 845-849 Copyright 0 1975 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 7, No. 6 Printed in U.S.A. Mechanism of -Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae
More informationConcise Antibiogram Toolkit Background
Background This toolkit is designed to guide nursing homes in creating their own antibiograms, an important tool for guiding empiric antimicrobial therapy. Information about antibiograms and instructions
More informationTHE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS
THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS Stefanie Desmet University Hospitals Leuven Laboratory medicine microbiology stefanie.desmet@uzleuven.be
More informationVitek QC Sets. Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets
Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets MicroBioLogics is selling two types of Vitek 2 microorganism identification sets. They are listed below in two columns. The first column lists the 2008 quality control microorganisms
More informationBACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)
BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016) VA Palo Alto Health Care System April 14, 2017 Trisha Nakasone, PharmD, Pharmacy Service Russell Ryono, PharmD, Public Health Surveillance
More informationCONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology
VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology Bugs and Drugs Elaine Dowell SM MLS (ASCP), Marti Roe SM MLS (ASCP), Sarah Parker MD, Jason Child PharmD, and Samuel R.
More informationWhat s new in EUCAST methods?
What s new in EUCAST methods? Derek Brown EUCAST Scientific Secretary Interactive question 1 MIC determination MH-F broth for broth microdilution testing of fastidious microorganisms Gradient MIC tests
More informationMercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016
Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016 These statistics are intended solely as a GUIDE to choosing appropriate
More informationDisk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Branhamella catarrhalis
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Oct. 1987, p. 1519-1523 Vol. 31, No. 10 0066-4804/87/101519-05$00/0 Copyright 1987, American Society for Microbiology Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Branhamella
More informationAntimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course Cascade Reporting Cascade Reporting I. Selecting Antimicrobial Agents for Testing and Reporting Selection of the most appropriate antimicrobials to
More informationReceived 5 February 2004/Returned for modification 16 March 2004/Accepted 7 April 2004
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Aug. 2004, p. 3112 3118 Vol. 48, No. 8 0066-4804/04/$08.00 0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.3112 3118.2004 Copyright 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
More information2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report
Gram negative Sepsis Outcome Programme (GNSOP) 2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report Prepared by A/Professor Thomas Gottlieb Concord Hospital Sydney Jan Bell The University of Adelaide Adelaide On behalf
More informationCONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology
VOLUME XXIII NUMBER 1 July 2008 CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology Bugs and Drugs Elaine Dowell, SM (ASCP), Marti Roe SM (ASCP), Ann-Christine Nyquist MD, MSPH Are the bugs winning? The 2007
More informationChildrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)
Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011) Prepared by: Department of Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre For further information contact: Andrew Walkty, MD, FRCPC Medical
More informationC.D.S. USERS GROUP. NEWSLETTER No. 3. Report of the CDS Users Group Workshop held at the. ASM Gold Coast Meeting 1991
THE PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL The Prince of Wales Hospital, Cnr. High & Avoca Streets, Randwick. N.S.W. 2031. SMB/BG 20 th August, 1991. Dear Colleague, C.D.S. USERS GROUP NEWSLETTER No. 3 Report of the
More informationon February 12, 2018 by guest
AAC Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 12 February 2018 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/aac.00047-18 Copyright 2018 Stapert et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
More informationAminoglycoside-resistant enterococci
Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci M. J. BASKER, B. SLOCOMBE, AND R. SUTHERLAND From Beecham Pharmaceuticals Research Division, Brockham Park, Betchworth, Surrey J. clin. Path., 1977, 30, 375-380 SUMMARY
More informationMichael Hombach*, Guido V. Bloemberg and Erik C. Böttger
J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 622 632 doi:10.1093/jac/dkr524 Advance Access publication 13 December 2011 Effects of clinical breakpoint changes in CLSI guidelines 2010/2011 and EUCAST guidelines 2011
More informationBSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8)
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2009) 64, 454 489 doi:10.1093/jac/dkp244 Advance Access publication 8 July 2009 BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8) J. M. Andrews* for
More informationEUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)
EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM) Christian G. Giske, MD/PhD Chairman of ESDReM Karolinska University Hospital and EUCAST ECCMID, 22 maj 2013 The background Guidance on
More informationPerformance Information. Vet use only
Performance Information Vet use only Performance of plates read manually was measured in three sites. Each centre tested Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, staphylococci and pseudomonas-like organisms.
More information6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS
6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS 6.1 INTRODUCTION Microorganisms that cause infectious disease are called pathogenic microbes. Although
More informationDrug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit
J. clin. Path., 1977, 30, 160-164 Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit KIM BRIDGES AND E. J. L. LOWBURY From the MRC Industrial Injuries and Burns Unit, Birmingham
More informationMICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Apr. 2000, p. 1062 1066 Vol. 44, No. 4 0066-4804/00/$04.00 0 Copyright 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin,
More informationIn Vitro Susceptibility to Pexiganan of Bacteria Isolated from Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
In Vitro Susceptibility to Pexiganan of Bacteria Isolated from Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers Yigong Ge, Dorothy MacDonald, Marietta M. Henry, Howard I. Hait, Kimberly A. Nelson, Benjamin A. Lipsky, Michael
More informationIn Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities of T-3761, a New Quinolone Derivative
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Mar. 1993, p. 384-392 0066-4804/93/030384-09$02.00/0 Copyright 1993, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 37, No. 3 In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities
More informationHelen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory
METHODS USED IN NEW ZEALAND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES TO IDENTIFY AND REPORT EXTENDED-SPECTRUM β-lactamase- PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE by Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory
More informationLiofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms
Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms Microbiology Products since 1983 Liofilchem Chromatic ESBL Selective
More informationBIOLACTAM. Product Description. An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity
BIOLACTAM www.biolactam.eu An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity 1.5-3h 20 Copyright 2014 VL-Diagnostics GmbH. All rights reserved. Product
More informationFactors affecting plate assay of gentamicin
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1977) 3, 17-23 Factors affecting plate assay of gentamicin II. Media D. C. Shanson* and C. J. Hince Department of Medical Microbiology, The London Hospital Medical
More informationEffects of Minocycline and Other Antibiotics on Fusobacterium necrophorum Infections in Mice
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Apr. 1975, p. 421-425 Copyright 0 1975 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 7, No. 4 Printed in U.S.A. Effects of Minocycline and Other s on Fusobacterium necrophorum
More informationEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Routine and extended internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 5.0, valid from 015-01-09 This document should be cited as "The
More informationBactericidal and Bacteriostatic Action of Chloramphenicol
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, JUly 1979, p. 13-18 66-484/79/7-13/6$2./ Vol. 16, No. 1 Bactericidal and Bacteriostatic Action of Chloramphenicol Against Meningeal Pathogens JAMES J. RAHAL, JR.,'*
More informationTECHNICAL BULLETIN PURELL Advanced with Aloe Instant Hand Sanitizer
TECHNICAL BULLETIN PURELL Advanced with Aloe Instant Hand Sanitizer INDICATIONS: Hand sanitizer to help reduce bacteria on the skin that could cause disease. Recommended for repeated use. DIRECTIONS: Place
More informationOriginal Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**
Original Article In Vitro Activity of Cefminox and Other β-lactam Antibiotics Against Clinical Isolates of Extended- Spectrum-β-lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Ratri Hortiwakul,
More informationComparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods
J Clin Pathol 1984;37:159-165 Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods JJS SNELL, MVS DANVERS, PS GARDNER From the Division of Microbiological Reagents and
More informationEDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING
Commentary provided by: Linsey Donner, MPH, CPH, MLS (ASCP) CM Assistant Professor, Microbiology and Serology College of Allied Health Professions, Division of Medical Laboratory Science University of
More informationMark Your Calendars Now! Next Event Ships: September 14, 2015
www.wslhpt.org 2601 Agriculture Drive Madison, WI 53718 (800) 462-5261 (608) 265-1111 Shipment Date: June 15, 2015 Questions or comments should be directed to Amanda Weiss at 800-462-5261 x51 or amanda.weiss@slh.wisc.edu.
More informationJanuary 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1
January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1. and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Testing Conditions Medium: diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) Broth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
More informationFundamental Concepts in the Use of Antibiotics. Case. Case. TM is a 24 year old male admitted to ICU after TBI and leg fracture from MVA ICU day 3
Fundamental Concepts in the Use of Antibiotics Todd Miano, PharmD, MSCE Critical Care Pharmacist Pharmacoepidemiology Fellow Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Case TM is a 24
More informationUSA Product Label CLINTABS TABLETS. Virbac. brand of clindamycin hydrochloride tablets. ANADA # , Approved by FDA DESCRIPTION
VIRBAC CORPORATION USA Product Label http://www.vetdepot.com P.O. BOX 162059, FORT WORTH, TX, 76161 Telephone: 817-831-5030 Order Desk: 800-338-3659 Fax: 817-831-8327 Website: www.virbacvet.com CLINTABS
More information