The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System

Similar documents
Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net)

MRSA in the United Kingdom status quo and future developments

The challenge of growing resistance

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the European Union

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the European Union

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

AMR epidemiological situation: ECDC update

A web-based interactive tool to explore antibiotic resistance and consumption via maps and charts

What is the problem? Latest data on antibiotic resistance

The evolutionary epidemiology of antibiotic resistance evolution

Prof. Otto Cars. We are overconsuming a global resource. It is a collective responsibility by governments, supranational organisatons

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Quelle politique antibiotique pour l Europe? Dominique L. Monnet

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

European poultry industry trends

Antibiotic resistance: the rise of the superbugs

Health Service Executive Parkgate St. Business Centre, Dublin 8 Tel:

Prevention and control of antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings: raising awareness about best practices

HSE - Health Protection Surveillance Centre Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption in Ireland

WHO global and regional activities on AMR and collaboration with partner organisations

Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial consumption in Europe

Pneumococcus: Antibiotic Resistance in the Region

TECHNICAL REPORT External quality assessment of laboratory performance European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net), 2017

Consumption of antibiotics in hospitals. Antimicrobial stewardship.

Nosocomial Infections: What Are the Unmet Needs

EU Health Priorities. Jurate Svarcaite Secretary General PGEU

rates adjusted for age, sex, infection subclass, and type of antibiotic treatment used) by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in humans in the EU and conclusions from the ECDC-EFSA- EMA JIACRA report

MRSA control strategies in Europekeeping up with epidemiology?

Stratégie et action européennes

Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Lack of Change in Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Pediatric Hospital Despite Marked Changes in Antibiotic Utilization

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

«Antibiotic Stewardship» programmes & antibiotic resistance

Hosted by the Infection Prevention Society A Webber Training Teleclass

Antimicrobial consumption

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

North West Neonatal Operational Delivery Network Working together to provide the highest standard of care for babies and families

The threat of multidrug-resistant microorganisms and how to deal with it in Europe

WHO laboratory-based global survey on multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in health care interim analysis

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

European Medicines Agency role and experience on antimicrobial resistance

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

FIS Resistance Surveillance: The UK Landscape. Alasdair MacGowan Chair BSAC Working Party on Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance

9.5 Antimicrobial Resistance

Surveillance of AMR in PHE: a multidisciplinary,

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Initiatives taken to reduce antimicrobial resistance in DK and in the EU in the health care sector

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Hand Hygiene and MDRO (Multidrug-resistant Organisms) - Science and Myth PROF MARGARET IP DEPT OF MICROBIOLOGY

Antibacterial Resistance In Wales

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

Changing patterns of poultry production in the European Union

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

Protocol for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary Isolates in Scotland

Antimicrobial consumption

Screening programmes for Hospital Acquired Infections

ECDC activities on antimicrobial resistance & healthcare-associated infections (ARHAI Programme) Ülla-Karin Nurm, ECDC Tallinn, 13 May 2013

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain. Dr. Ernesto Liebana Head of BIOCONTAM Unit. EFSA

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK BASED MEAT INSPECTION SYSTEM SANCO / 4403 / 2000

Tel: Fax:

OECD WORK ON AMR: TACKLING THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE ON HUMAN HEALTH. Michele Cecchini OECD Health Division

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Stop overuse of antibiotics in humans rational use

9.4 Antimicrobial Resistance

How do people obtain antibiotics in European countries: an overview

Foodborne Zoonotic Parasites

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report December 2018

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infections in Europe

The importance of infection control in the era of multi drug resistance

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

3/1/2016. Antibiotics --When Less is More. Most Urgent Threats. Serious Threats

Konsequenzen für Bevölkerung und Gesundheitssysteme. Stephan Harbarth Infection Control Program

Antimicrobial Resistance. Tackling the Burden in the European Union. Briefing note for EU/EEA countries

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Chart showing the average height of males and females in various world countries.

Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children s Hospital Research Institute, 950 West 28 th Ave,

Study Protocol. Funding: German Center for Infection Research (TTU-HAARBI, Research Clinical Unit)

This document is available on the English-language website of the Banque de France

EssayOnDeclawingCatsForStudents

Decrease of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium from bloodstream infections in

Collecting and Interpreting Stewardship Data: Breakout Session

Mono- versus Bitherapy for Management of HAP/VAP in the ICU

SCIENTIFIC REPORT. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in turkey flocks, in the EU,

Why should we care about multi-resistant bacteria? Clinical impact and

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP

LOHMANN TIERZUCHT. The specialist for layer breeding BREEDING FOR SUCCESS TOGETHER

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Original Articles. K A M S W Gunarathne 1, M Akbar 2, K Karunarathne 3, JRS de Silva 4. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2011; 40(4):


Burden of disease of antibiotic resistance The example of MRSA. Eva Melander Clinical Microbiology, Lund University Hospital

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial Resistance

European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) in Scotland: 2004

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

FM - Male, 38YO. MRSA nasal swab (+) Due to positive MRSA nasal swab test, patient will be continued on Vancomycin 1500mg IV q12 for MRSA treatment...

Randall Singer, DVM, MPVM, PhD

Transcription:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE BACTERIOLOGY The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System M. E. A. de Kraker 1,2, V. Jarlier 3, J. C. M. Monen 1, O. E. Heuer 4, N. van de Sande 5 and H. Grundmann 1,2 1) Centre for Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, Bilthoven, 2) Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, 3) Bactériologie-Hygiène UPMC Univ Paris 6, EA1541 and Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix (Assistance publique Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris, France, 4) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden and 5) WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract We investigated bacteraemia trends for five major bacterial pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, and determined how expanding antimicrobial resistance influenced the total burden of bacteraemias in Europe. Aetiological fractions of species and antibiotic phenotypes were extracted from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) database for laboratories, which consistently reported between 2002 and 2008. Trend analyses used generalized linear models. Robustness of results was assessed by iterative analysis for different geographic regions. From 2002 to 2008, the overall number of reports increased annually by 6.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2 6.5%), from 46 095 to 67 876. In the subset of laboratories providing denominator information, the overall incidence increased from 0.58/1000 patient-days to 0.90/1000 patientdays (7.2% per year; 95% CI 6.9 7.5%). The frequency of reported bacteraemia isolates of S. aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae increased moderately, while increase in E. coli and Enterococcus faecium was more pronounced. Bacteraemias caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus increased until 2005 (7.6% per year; 95% CI 6.1 9.1%), and then decreased ()4.8% per year; 95% CI )6.1 to )3.5%), whereas the number attributable to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus increased continuously (3.4% per year; 95% CI 3.0 3.7). Increasing rates of E. coli were mainly caused by antibiotic-resistant phenotypes. Our data suggest that the burden of bacterial bloodstream infection has been increasing for all species during EARSS surveillance. Trends were mainly driven by resistant strains and clearly dissociated between resistant and susceptible isolates. It appears that infections with resistant clones add to rather than replace infections caused by susceptible bacteria. As a consequence, expansion of antibiotic resistance creates an additional strain on healthcare systems. Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, bacteraemia, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, epidemiology, Escherichia coli, Europe, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, trend Original Submission: 11 June 2012; Revised Submission: 29 August 2012; Accepted: 1 September 2012 Editor: M. Paul Article published online: 3 October 2012 Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 860 868 10.1111/1469-0691.12028 Corresponding author: H. Grundmann, Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, the Netherlands E-mail: hajo.grundmann@rivm.nl Introduction It has been suggested that, more than 23 000 people died of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteraemias in Europe in 2007 alone [1]. At the same time, bacteraemias seem to be rising in numbers [2 4], although most of the recent investigations have focused on S. aureus at national level. It remains unclear whether these trends can be generalized across species and across Europe. It is also unknown what may cause this dynamic; (i) changes in pathogen-specific transmissibility, virulence or resistance, (ii) new ecological opportunities linked to an aging population or increasingly complex medical care, or (iii) a combination of these. Alternatively, we could be merely seeing some random fluctuation at regional levels or an increase in detection rates caused by better diagnostic practices. Clinical Microbiology and Infection ª2012 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

CMI de Kraker et al. Changing epidemiology of BSI 861 One of the possible, adaptive responses of bacteria under antibiotic selection includes the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. A number of observational studies have suggested that resistant strains cause additional infections rather than replacing those caused by susceptible bacteria [5 8]. This hypothesis was first put forward by Boyce et al. [9]. and was based on data for S. aureus from single centres or countries. The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS, renamed EARS-Net in 2010), maintains the largest database of routinely collected antibiotic susceptibility data for bacteraemia isolates worldwide [10]. Since its launch in 1999, the initiative has grown in scope and size. Over the last 10 years, antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results for seven major pathogens from more than 900 000 bacteraemic episodes have been reported by over 900 laboratories from 33 countries in Europe [11]. The EARSS participants have been using consistent protocols and frequently provide denominator data so this dataset provides a useful tool to describe the changing epidemiology of bacteraemias for different species and different species-specific resistance traits. On the basis of surveillance data, we here describe the temporal dynamics of five major pathogens (S. aureus, E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium) causing bacteraemias between 2002 and 2008, and explore how antimicrobial resistance impinges on the total burden of bacteraemias in Europe. Material and Methods Data consisted of routine AST results reported to EARSS for primary isolates (first isolate per species per patient per year) of five bacterial species causing bloodstream infections; S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae (since 1999), E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium (since 2001). Participating laboratories routinely include all diagnostic blood cultures that become positive for the above-mentioned species and report results through their laboratory information system using a standardized digital communication tool. Data for the first year of reporting were excluded to correct for potential inconsistencies introduced at the start of the surveillance initiative. Data collected after the transfer of the network to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in 2009 were excluded to rule out possible artefacts caused by changes in hospital and laboratory coding. Analyses are therefore based on data reported to EARSS between 2002 and 2008. The AST results were ascertained according to agreed protocols [12] and the general quality and comparability of these data were evaluated by annual external quality assessment exercises [11]. For detailed trend analyses, reports for S. aureus and E. coli were stratified by class-specific susceptibility patterns: S. aureus, b-lactams (J01C and D); E. coli, aminopenicillins (J01CA: ampicillin or amoxicillin), aminoglycosides (J01GB: gentamicin, tobramycin or amikacin), fluoroquinolones (J01MA: ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin or levofloxacin) and third generation cephalosporins (J01DD: ceftriaxone, ceftazidime or cefotaxime). Class resistance was defined as resistance to at least one antimicrobial compound within each ATC category. Information concerning denominator data including type of hospital, number of patient-days, number of hospital beds, occupancy and total number of blood culture isolates, was available for 5 years (2002, 2004, 2006, 2007 and 2008) [11,13]. Selected datasets We included data from laboratories that consistently reported AST results between 2002 and 2008 (Subset A). Consistency was regarded as quarterly reporting of bacteraemias by the laboratory identifiable by laboratory identification code in the surveillance database. Subset A consisted of 438 laboratories (71% of laboratories participating in 2002) from 27 countries (96% of countries participating in 2002) reporting 410 333 bacteraemias (66% of the total number of cases). Incidence densities were calculated for institutions, which reported both AST and denominator data between 2002 and 2008 (Subset AD). Subset AD consisted of 136 (22%) laboratories from 12 (43%) countries, reporting 149 933 (24%) bacteraemias. For a more inclusive analysis of all countries participating in EARSS in 2008, all data reported for 2008 were used for subset 2008A. Incidence densities for 2008 were obtained for laboratories that reported both AST and denominator data (Subset 2008AD, 62% of 2008 laboratories, 61% of 2008 bacteraemias) (Table 1). Statistical analysis Incidence densities were based on the number of reported bacteraemia isolates per 1000 patient-days. The number of patient-days was approximated by multiplying the number of reported beds per hospital with 365.25 days assuming an 80% bed occupancy (mean European bed occupancy) [11]. The average annual increase in bacteraemias was calculated using generalized linear models with Poisson distribution and loglink function with year as the independent variable. Species-specific trends were compared with the overall trend by including the overall number of bacteraemia isolates as a baseline (offset). Trends in resistance phenotypes were modelled by including each phenotype as a dependent variable in a separate generalized linear model. The significance of trends was determined at the conventional probability threshold of p <0.05 using the Wald test.

862 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 19 Number 9, September 2013 CMI Country Subset A Subset AD Subset 2008A Subset 2008AD 2002 2008 2002 2008 + DI 2008 2008 + DI Austria 10 (12 910) 38 (6110) 37 (5822) Belgium 81 (28 204) 103 (4219) 26 (1219) Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 (140) Bulgaria 13 (2021) 10 (1642) 23 (406) 20 (381) Croatia 13 (8652) 11 (7829) 19 (1721) 18 (1711) Cyprus 5 (309) 5 (309) Czech Republic 41 (29 967) 41 (28 464) 47 (5579) 47 (5479) Denmark 5 (15 449) 15 (6517) Estonia 8 (2794) 6 (1769) 11 (603) 11 (598) Finland 12 (20 647) 15 (4056) 4 (595) France 19 (34 024) 11 (23 270) 158 (14 485) 153 (13 956) Germany 4 (4 118) 14 (3354) Greece 28 (13 787) 46 (3322) Hungary 19 (11 476) 26 (2832) 16 (1728) Iceland 2 (1732) 2 (1647) 2 (249) 2 (220) Ireland 21 (21 409) 41 (4243) 33 (4092) Israel 5 (12 867) 4 (8607) 5 (1641) 3 (1118) Italy 26 (16 355) 32 (2687) 18 (1694) Latvia 12 (322) 12 (322) Lithuania 13 (696) 12 (652) Luxembourg 4 (2198) 6 (537) 4 (307) Malta 1 (1734) 1 (1637) 1 (285) 1 (285) the Netherlands 8 (13 430) 18 (4701) 4 (664) Norway 11 (18 803) 13 (3612) 8 (2427) Poland 13 (1455) 39 (293) Portugal 15 (14 874) 12 (13 398) 22 (4029) 20 (3861) Romania 3 (491) 6 (125) Slovenia 10 (8907) 10 (8727) 10 (1697) 10 (1667) Spain 25 (30 482) 9 (11 408) 32 (6827) 26 (5459) Sweden 21 (51 312) 19 (41 535) 21 (8713) 21 (7887) Switzerland 22 (4856) Turkey 16 (3566) 16 (3566) UK 20 (30 235) 55 (7294) 21 (927) Total 438 (410 333) 136 (149 933) 889 (110 026) 548 (66 946) TABLE 1. Number of laboratories (number of isolates reported) that consistently reported Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis bacteremias to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System database in the different subsets, displayed per country Subset A: laboratories that consistently reported antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results between 2002 and 2008. Subset AD: laboratories that consistently reported AST and denominator results between 2002 and 2008. Subset 2008A: laboratories that reported AST results for 2008. Subset 2008AD: laboratories that reported AST and denominator results for 2008. Countries were grouped by resistance levels for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli (G3CREC) as well as geography. Region I (low resistance, North) included Denmark, Finland, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden; Region II (intermediate resistance, West) included Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxemburg and the UK); Region III (intermediate resistance MRSA, high resistance for G3CREC, East) included Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovenia; Region IV (high resistance, South) included Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. Data were analysed using SAS 9.2. For all estimates 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported. Results Changes over time The total number of episodes reported between 2002 and 2008 for all five pathogens increased by 47% from 46 095 to 67 876 between 2002 and 2008 (Subset A). This corresponds to an annual increase of 6.4% (95% CI 6.2 6.5%). Although consistent for all five pathogens, the fastest increase (in rate) was observed for Enterococcus faecium (1118 in 2002 to 3128 in 2008; annual increase 19.3%; 95% CI 18.3 20.3%) and the largest increase (in volume) was observed for E. coli (20 151 in 2002 to 32 194 in 2008; annual increase 8.1%; 95% CI 7.8 8.3%) (Fig. 1, Table 2). Analyses of incidence densities (Subset AD), based on a subsample of laboratories that provided denominator information, confirmed these trends. (see Supplementary information, Table S1). For S. aureus, the frequency of MRSA increased, from 3297/15 422 (21%) in 2002 to 4230/18 003 (23%) in 2005 (Subset A). Then the trend reversed and frequencies decreased to 3628/18 894 (19%) in 2008. Between 2002 and 2005 the annual increase was 7.6% (95% CI 6.1 9.1%), followed by an average annual decrease of )4.8% (95% CI )6.1 to )3.5%). Independent of the biphasic behaviour of MRSA, reports of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) consistently increased from 12 125 to 15 266 (period 1: 4.0%; 95% CI 3.2 4.8%; period 2: 3.6%; 95% CI 2.8 4.3%; Wald test for differences in trends: p 0.27).

CMI de Kraker et al. Changing epidemiology of BSI 863 FIG. 1. Trends in the total number of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia isolates reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. Pathogen 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 E. coli S. aureus S. pneumoniae E. faecalis E. faecium 20 151 22 620 24 371 27 328 29 543 30 931 32 194 15 422 17 325 17 550 18 003 18 210 18 665 18 894 5725 6674 6721 7458 7051 7421 7555 3679 4309 4625 5201 5837 6012 6105 1118 1374 1563 2091 2541 2938 3128 TABLE 2. Average annual change in the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemias reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008, expressed as absolute change and relative change above or below the average for all species combined. Species Change per year in % (95% CI) p-value Relative change per year in % (95% CI) p-value E. coli 8.1 (7.8 8.3) <0.01 1.7 (1.4 1.9) <0.01 S. aureus 2.8 (2.5 3.1) <0.01 )3.4 ()3.7 to ).1) <0.01 Streptococcus 3.8 (3.4 4.3) <0.01 )2.4 ()2.9 to ).0) <0.01 pneumoniae Enterococcus 8.7 (8.2 9.3) <0.01 2.3 (1.7 2.8) <0.01 faecalis Enterococcus 19.3 (18.3 20.3) <0.01 12.4 (11.5 13.4) <0.01 faecium All species combined 6.4 (6.2 6.5) <0.01 Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. Results are based on generalized linear models s with Poisson distribution. For E. coli, complete AST results (aminopenicillins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and third-generation cephalosporins) were available for 84% of all reports (Subset A). The frequency of reported E. coli infections increased irrespective of resistance (Fig. 2). However, the number of reported bacteraemias caused by G3CREC showed the steepest rise, with an average annual increase of 29.9% (95% CI 28.2 31.5%, Fig. 3). The latter group also contained the largest number of combined resistance; 76% were reported co-resistant to fluoroquinolones, and 48% to aminoglycosides, (Table 3). The number of resistant phenotypes expanded faster than infections caused by susceptible isolates, leading to a decrease in the proportion susceptible from 51% in 2002 to 42% in 2008 (Fig. 3). In 2008, 110 026 bacteraemia isolates were reported, (Subset 2008A), of which a majority (61%, 66 946) could be used to derive incidence densities based on available denominator data (Subset 2008AD, Table 1). Escherichia coli was the most frequent causative pathogen, representing 47% of the reports and occurring at a density of 0.29/1000 patient-days, followed by S. aureus (29% of all reports, 0.19/1000 patientdays), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%, 0.05/1000 patientdays), Enterococcus faecalis (9%, 0.06/1000 patient-days) and Enterococcus faecium (5%, 0.03/1000 patient-days). The most frequent resistance phenotype, among all evaluated pathogen compound combinations, was fluoroquinolone-resistance in E. coli (9% of all reported isolates, 0.08/1000 patient-days), followed by methicillin-resistance among S. aureus (6%, 0.05/ 1000 patient-days) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistance in E. coli isolates (3%, 0.03/1000 patient-days). Region-specific changes In all four defined geographic regions (see Material and methods), the reports for E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemias increased between 2002 and 2008 (Subset A). Reports for S. aureus in Region II (West) remained relatively stable (see Supporting information, Table S2), which was a result of the decrease in MRSA bacteraemias in this region between 2005

864 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 19 Number 9, September 2013 CMI Resistance pattern Susceptible to all three antibiotic classes Resistant to: aminopenicillins fluoroquinolones aminopenicillins + fluoroquinolones Aminoglycoside resistance (%) 0.5 3.1 8.4 26.8 aminopenicillins + third-generation cephalosporins 22.8 All three antibiotic classes 55.6 FIG. 2. Total number of Escherichia coli bacteraemia isolates with different resistance phenotypes reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. R = resistance; G3C = third-generation cephalosporins; FQ = fluoroquinolones; amipn = aminopenicillins. For reasons of clarity, combined resistance proportions for aminoglycosides are exclusively displayed in a Table. and 2008. This region-specific trend was mainly responsible for the overall decrease of MRSA within the EARSS during this period. Over the same time the number of MRSA increased in Region III (East). Irrespective of MRSA trends, all regions reported rising levels of MSSA (see Supporting information, Table S3). Rapid expansion of G3CREC bacteraemias was observed in all regions as well, although the rise was less pronounced for countries in region IV (South) (see Supporting information, Table S4). The distribution of pathogens in 2008 was similar for all regions, with E. coli being the most prevalent bacterium among the five included pathogens (see Supporting information, Table S5) and fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli (range 0.04 0.15/1000 patient-days) being the most common identified resistance phenotype (see Supporting information, Table S6). Discussion Data regarding the dynamics of invasive infections are crucial to inform the public health debate about prioritization in healthcare. We demonstrated that the number of bacteraemia isolates reported to the EARSS for five major bacterial species, S. aureus, E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, causing bacteraemia have markedly increased in 27 European countries between 2002 and 2008. Within these 7 years, absolute numbers increased by 47% at an annual average of 6.4%. Notably, E. coli (20 151 reported in 2002 and 32 194 reported in 2008, 8.7% annual increase) and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemias (1118 reported in 2002 and 3128 reported in 2008, 19.3% annual increase) showed the most significant changes. For E. coli this trend was mainly the result of an expansion in antibiotic-resistant strains, often featuring multi-drug resistance. For Enterococcus faecium the frequency of multi-resistant isolates also increased. Low numbers, however, precluded statistical confirmation of this trend (data not shown). Reports for S. aureus increased at more moderate rates (2.8% per year). This could be attributed to a decline in MRSA after 2005, whereas MSSA showed a steady upward trend in almost all regions. The strength of the present study lies in its inclusiveness and representativeness. The analyses incorporated data about five major pathogens from more than 1000 hospitals serving large geographic areas, and comprising 7 years of continuous reporting. A limitation of the present study is the lack of consistent data about blood culture frequency at laboratory level. Rising investigation density could artificially increase case ascertainment. Denominator data from EARSS, however, indicate that the overall number of blood culture

CMI de Kraker et al. Changing epidemiology of BSI 865 7 FIG. 3. Relative increase in the number of Escherichia coli bacteraemia isolates with different resistance phenotypes (index year = 2002) reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. Symbols indicate ascertained values and lines are based on generalized linear models with Poisson distribution. Numbers and the average annual increase per phenotype are displayed in the table. R = resistance; G3C = third-generation cephalosporins; FQ = fluoroquinolones; amino = aminoglycosides; amipn = aminopenicillins. Relative increase (2002 = index) 6 5 4 3 2 1 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year Susceptible G3CR FQR AminoR AmipnR Resistance pattern Number Change per year 2002 2008 in % (CI 95 ) Susceptible 8068 12 092 6.2 (5.8 6.6) G3CR 321 1785 29.9 (28.2 31.5) FQR 1796 5613 19.3 (18.6 20.1) aminor 823 2138 17.2 (16.0 18.4) amipnr 7613 14 400 11.1 (10.7 11.5) Total isolates tested 15 952 27 214 8.8 (8.6 9.1) TABLE 3. Percent of combined resistance for Escherichia coli bacteraemia isolates (n = 156 751) reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008. Susceptible AMIPN FQ AMINO G3C 34 2 0.2 0 AMIPN S 4 0.9 0 R 29 12 9 FQ S 43 2 1 R 88 30 20 AMINO S 47 12 2 R 94 76 32 G3C S 48 14 5 R 100 76 48 Overall 50 16 7 4 Resistance proportions (%) to one class of antibiotics was calculated in the absence (S) and presence (R) of resistance to each of the other classes: aminopenicillins (AMIPN), fluoroquinolones (FQ), aminoglycosides (AMINO) and third-generation cephalosporins (G3C). Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. sets per 1000 patient-days did not markedly change over the years [11,13]. Increasing hospital activity, could also explain the increasing number of reported bacteraemia isolates. Therefore, trend analyses were repeated with incidence densities of bacteraemias in the subset of laboratories providing denominator data. This takes into account changes in the number of admissions as well as changes in length of stay. These analyses confirmed that the upward trends were real for this subset of participating laboratories. As the number of reports increased in all four geographical regions simultaneously, change in investigation density (ascertainment bias) was an unlikely explanation for the observed trends. Several studies describing trends of bacteraemias have been published. A recent paper of Laupland et al [14]. reported decreasing rates for S. aureus in four different regions within Denmark. This may be associated with low levels of MRSA in the selected areas (overall MRSA incidence 1.9/100 000 patient-days versus 4.4/100 000 patient-days in the present study). We also reported relatively small

866 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 19 Number 9, September 2013 CMI increases for S. aureus, especially in areas with decreasing levels of MRSA. A report from England, Wales and Northern Ireland [3], and two single centre studies from Spain [15] and Israel [16] reported a similar secular increase in the frequency of bacteraemias. In all countries this observation could be mainly attributed to a rising number of infections with gram-negative bacteria [3,15,16]. Accepting that the observed trends are real, what could be the cause? The included surveillance data did not provide enough detail to be able to investigate the influence of healthcare-associated or community-associated infections, or the impact of changes in case mix over time. However, hospitals are facing a relative increase of elderly patients [2,5,15 17]. At the same time, there is a growing proportion of patients who receive complex medical care and are subsequently exposed to more invasive devices [15,18]. These changes may have increased the ecological opportunities for opportunistic bacteria to cause invasive infections [19], and could account for the overall increase of bacteraemias. In addition, emergence and global expansion of highly successful, resistant clones, such as Enterococcus faecium CC17 and E. coli ST131, could be associated with higher prevalence of infections caused by resistant strains [19 22]. For S. aureus, major pandemic MRSA clones are found as well. However, the spread of MRSA is oligo-clonal with different regions affected by genetically unrelated lineages of potentially differential fitness [23,24]. This could explain why western countries reported decreasing trends, while eastern European countries still face an increasing prevalence of MRSA. However, trends may have also been reversed as a result of the successful implementation of extensive infection control programmes, like those specifically aimed at reducing the incidence of MRSA in UK [25,26] and French [27] hospitals. It therefore seems that trends are increasing most rapidly for species for which international, antibiotic-resistant clones have been described. At the same time, invasive infections caused by susceptible bacteria also show a monotonous increase albeit at a lower rate. This suggests that emergence of antimicrobial resistance does not replace infections caused by susceptible strains, but rather causes additional infections [9,28]. Although recent data showed that addition or replacement of susceptible infections by resistant ones may differ between regions [14] and this requires further study. In conclusion, this study confirmed that the burden of bacteraemias is increasing in European hospitals. The increase is ubiquitous and can be observed for gram-negative as well as for gram-positive pathogens. The main driving forces behind this rise remains to be elucidated, but the expansion of successful antibiotic resistant clones among an increasingly vulnerable hospital population remains the most compelling explanation for the observed trends. Notably, expansion of antimicrobial resistance seems to create an additional strain on healthcare systems by further increasing the burden of disease caused by difficult-to-treat bacteraemias in Europe. Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge all EARSS national representatives, data managers and laboratories for sharing their antimicrobial susceptibility data for bacteraemias in their countries. Transparency Declaration Conflicts of interest: Nothing to declare. The presented data were generated as part of routine surveillance activities in Europe. Supporting Information Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article: Table S1. Average annual change in the incidence density per 1000 patient-days of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemias as reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008. Only laboratories that consistently reported and provided denominator data for all years were included. Results are based on generalized linear models with Poisson distribution. Table S2. Average annual change in the number of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia isolates reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008, overall and per region, expressed as absolute change and relative change above or below the average for all species combined. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. Results are based on generalized linear models with Poisson distribution. Table S3. Average annual change in the number of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia isolates reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008, overall and per region. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were

CMI de Kraker et al. Changing epidemiology of BSI 867 included. Separate estimates are given for the period before and after the tipping point of the MRSA trend in 2005. Results are based on generalized linear models with Poisson distribution. Table S4. Average annual change in the number of Escherichia coli bacteraemia isolates resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (G3C), fluoroquinolones (FQ), aminoglycosides (AMINO) or aminopenicillins (AMIPN) reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System between 2002 and 2008, overall and per region. Only laboratories that consistently reported for all years were included. Results are based on generalized linear models with Poisson distribution. Table S5. Frequency (fraction of total number of bacteraemia isolates reported per region) of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia isolates reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System in 2008, displayed per region. Table S6. Number of bacteraemia isolates (percentage resistant) and incidence density per 1000 patient-days of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (FLUO), methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli (G3CREC) bacteraemias reported to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System in 2008, displayed per region. Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. References 1. De Kraker MEA, Davey PG, Grundmann H. Mortality and hospital stay associated with resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia: estimating the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e1001104. 2. Allard C, Carignan A, Bergevin M et al. Secular changes in incidence and mortality associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Quebec, Canada, 1991 2005. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14: 421 428. 3. Wilson J, Elgohari S, Livermore DM et al. Trends among pathogens reported as causing bacteraemia in England, 2004 2008. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17: 451 458. 4. Asgeirsson H, Gudlaugsson O, Kristinsson KG, Heiddal S, Kristjansson M. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Iceland, 1995 2008: changing incidence and mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17: 513 518. 5. Wyllie DH, Crook DW, Peto TE. Mortality after Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in two hospitals in Oxfordshire, 1997 2003: cohort study. BMJ 2006; 333: 281. 6. Stamm AM, Long MN, Belcher B. Higher overall nosocomial infection rate because of increased attack rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Infect Control 1993; 21: 70 74. 7. Morgan M, Salmon R, Evans-Williams D, Hosein I, Looker DN. Resistance to methicillin in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from blood and cerebrospinal fluid in Wales, 1993 1997. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 44: 541 544. 8. Jernigan JA, Clemence MA, Stott GA et al. Control of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital: one decade later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16: 686 696. 9. Boyce JM, White RL, Spruill EY. Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the incidence of nosocomial staphylococcal infections. J Infect Dis 1983; 148: 763. 10. Giske CG, Cornaglia G. Supranational surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: the legacy of the last decade and proposals for the future. Drug Resist Updat 2010; 13: 93 98. 11. EARSS-MT, Advisory Board, and National Representatives. EARSS annual report 2008. On-going surveillance of S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli, E. faecium, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa. 2009. Available at: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/surveillance/ears- Net/Documents/2008_EARSS_Annual_Report.pdf (last accessed 25 September 2012). 12. EARSS-MT. European Centre for Disease prevention and Control EARS-Net Reporting Protocol 2010. 2010. Available at: http:// www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/ surveillance/ears-net/documents/ 2010_EARS-Net_Reporting%20Protocol.pdf (last accessed 25 September 2012). 13. EARSS-MT, Advisory Board, and National Representatives. EARSS annual report 2004. On-going surveillance of S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli, E. faecium, E. faecalis. 2005. Available at: http://www.ecdc. europa.eu/en/activities/surveillance/ears-net/documents/2004_earss_ Annual_Report.pdf (last accessed 25 September 2012). 14. Laupland KB, Lyytikainen O, Sogaard M, Kennedy KJ, Knudsen JD, Ostergaard C, et al. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a multinational population-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 465 471. 15. Marcos M, Soriano A, Inurrieta A et al. Changing epidemiology of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: increasing prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 2119 2125. 16. Marchaim D, Zaidenstein R, Lazarovitch T, Karpuch Y, Ziv T, Weinberger M. Epidemiology of bacteremia episodes in a single center: increase in Gram-negative isolates, antibiotics resistance, and patient age. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 27: 1045 1051. 17. Polder JJ, Bonneux L, Meerding WJ, van der Maas PJ. Age-specific increases in health care costs. Eur J Public Health 2002; 12: 57 62. 18. Preyra C. Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses. Health Serv Res 2004; 39: 1027 1045. 19. Swafford S. Invasive devices increase risk of infection. BMJ 1997; 314: 1503. 20. Shepard BD, Gilmore MS. Antibiotic-resistant enterococci: the mechanisms and dynamics of drug introduction and resistance. Microbes Infect 2002; 4: 215 224. 21. Willems RJ, Top J, van Santen M et al. Global spread of vancomycinresistant Enterococcus faecium from distinct nosocomial genetic complex. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 821 828. 22. Oteo J, Perez-Vazquez M, Campos J. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: changing epidemiology and clinical impact. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010; 23: 320 326. 23. Grundmann H, Aires-de-Sousa M, Boyce J, Tiemersma E. Emergence and resurgence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat. Lancet 2006; 368: 874 885. 24. Deurenberg RH, Nulens E, Valvatne H et al. Cross-border dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Euregio Meuse-Rhin region. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15: 727 734. 25. Duerden B. Controlling healthcare-associated infections in the NHS. Clin Med 2008; 8: 140 143.

868 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 19 Number 9, September 2013 CMI 26. Cosgrove SE, Carmeli Y. The impact of antimicrobial resistance on health and economic outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1433 1437. 27. Jarlier V, Trystram D, Brun-Buisson C et al. Curbing methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in 38 French hospitals through a 15- year institutional control program. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 552 559. 28. Mostofsky E, Lipsitch M, Regev-Yochay G. Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus? J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 2199 2214.