SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar documents
Testing Phylogenetic Hypotheses with Molecular Data 1

How the eye sees. Properties of light. The light-gathering parts of the eye. 1. Properties of light. 2. The anatomy of the eye. 3.

Epigenetic regulation of Plasmodium falciparum clonally. variant gene expression during development in An. gambiae

Bioinformatics: Investigating Molecular/Biochemical Evidence for Evolution

Arrested oocyst maturation in Plasmodium parasites. lacking type II NADH:ubiquinone dehydrogenase

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Fig. 1: Comparison of chase parameters for focal pack (a-f, n=1119) and for 4 dogs from 3 other packs (g-m, n=107).

Pet-Temp PT-300 Ear Thermometer Frequently Asked Questions

Algebra 3 SAILS. Pacing Guide to make an A in the course = equivalent to 21 ACT math sub-score: SAILS Pacing for Traditional Schedule Module 1

Luteolysis and Pregnancy Outcomes in Dairy Cows after Treatment with Estrumate or Lutalyse

Next Wednesday declaration of invasive species due I will have Rubric posted tonight Paper is due in turnitin beginning of class 5/14/1

Comparing DNA Sequences Cladogram Practice

INFECTIOUS HEPATITIS, PARVOVIRUS & DISTEMPER

The Making of the Fittest: Natural Selection and Adaptation

Lab 6: Energizer Turtles

A case of achromatopsia. Perceptual Colour Space. Spectral Properties of Light. Subtractive Colour Mixture. Additive Colour Mixture

Perception & Attention Course. George Mather

A. Pulse-field gel of hummingbird genomic DNA. B. Bioanalyzer plot of hummingbird SMRTbell library

Exercise 4: Animal Adaptations

Effects of Cage Stocking Density on Feeding Behaviors of Group-Housed Laying Hens

Effective Vaccine Management (EVM) Global Data Analysis

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * For Judges Use Only

Ch. 88 EGG REFRIGERATION REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 88. EGG REFRIGERATION REQUIREMENTS

STEPHEN N. WHITE, PH.D.,

STAT170 Exam Preparation Workshop Semester

COMPARING DNA SEQUENCES TO UNDERSTAND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS WITH BLAST

THE STUDY OF HOW THE NOSE AFFECTS THE TASTE OF FOOD. Maddie Mizelle. Cary Academy ABSTRACT

U 96 & The Laughing Sawfish

Multi-Frequency Study of the B3 VLA Sample. I GHz Data

New Model. Digital Mastitis Detector. Reduce of risk at early stage

FCI LT LM UNDERGROUND

ECONOMIC studies have shown definite

Answers to Questions about Smarter Balanced 2017 Test Results. March 27, 2018

MARY F. WILLSON RESULTS

Dark Skin, Blond Hair: Surprise in the Solomon Islands

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Ames, IA Ames, IA (515)

The color and patterning of pigmentation in cats, dogs, mice horses and other mammals results from the interaction of several different genes

Essential Skills for Assistant Training Revised 7/1/2018

The melanocortin 1 receptor (mc1r) is a gene that has been implicated in the wide

The genetic basis of breed diversification: signatures of selection in pig breeds

Part 1 : General multiple-choice questions

Weekly Schedule of Neuroscience (2018/2019) Week 1

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each.

426 Common Chaffinch. Put your logo here. COMMON CHAFFINCH (Fringilla coelebs) IDENTIFICATION

Weekly Schedule of Neuroscience (2017/2018) Week 1

FELINE CORONAVIRUS (FCoV) [FIP] ANTIBODY TEST KIT

Section: 101 (2pm-3pm) 102 (3pm-4pm)

Building Concepts: Mean as Fair Share

MSMR Enrichment Symposium, 15 April 2010 MSMR Enrichment Symposium, 15 April 2010

Was the Spotted Horse an Imaginary Creature? g.org/sciencenow/2011/11/was-the-spotted-horse-an-imagina.html

Supporting Online Material for

Supplementary Information. Chlamydia gallinacea is the endemic chlamydial species in chicken (Gallus gallus) Chengming Wang 1 **

The effect of Hydrolyzed Eggshell Membrane Powder on joint mobility in dogs

Fraction Approximation: Closer to Zero, One-half or One whole? CCSS: 3.NF.3, 4.NF.2 VA SOLs: 3.3, 4.2, 5.2

Flexibility in sheep systems lessons learnt from EverGraze research at Wagga/Tarcutta Michael Friend, CSU

Muse Teacher Guide: February 2018

A SINGLE VIBRISSAL COLUMN IN THE FIRST SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX OF THE MOUSE DEMONSTRATED WITH 2-DEOXYGLUCOSE

Optoacoustic imaging of an animal model of prostate cancer

Evolution in Action: Graphing and Statistics

Performance Task: Lizards, Lizards, Everywhere!

Appendix from T. J. Ord and J. A. Stamps, Species Identity Cues in Animal Communication

Developmental expression of synthetic cis-regulatory systems composed of spatial control elements from two different genes

Table of contents. DNA Dog food

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Formation of Proximal and Anterior Limb Skeleton Requires Early Function of Irx3 and Irx5 and Is Negatively Regulated by Shh Signaling

TREAT Steward. Antimicrobial Stewardship software with personalized decision support

Why individually weigh broilers from days onwards?

Impact of Northern Fowl Mite on Broiler Breeder Flocks in North Carolina 1

rodent species in Australia to the fecal odor of various predators. Rattus fuscipes (bush

Conservation genomics of the highly endangered Red Siskin

Veterinary Medical Terminology

CHAPTER 3 MUTATION AND ADAPTIVE TRAITS

Active sensing. Ehud Ahissar

419a Identification of House/Spanish Sparrows

In situ and Ex situ gene conservation in Russia

Effective Vaccine Management (EVM) Global Data Analysis

In-silico modification of antibacterial sulfa drugs to reduce affinity towards off-target Sepiapterin Reductase

Using Charm II 7600 For Residue Testing in Meats in Barbados

SHORT DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL PAPER CONTENT

SPECIAL LIST AFRICAN AVIARY BIRDS SECTION CHAMPION AVIARY BIRDS SECTION FOREIGN AVIARY BIRDS SECTION SPECIAL DESCRIPTION CASH DONATED BY OTHER PRIZES

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Yes, heterozygous organisms can pass a dominant allele onto the offspring. Only one dominant allele is needed to have the dominant genotype.

You are not forced to use the colours I use! Do your own thing if you wish, or copy it exactly as it is it s totally up to you

Modeling the Emergence of Multidrug Antibiotic Resistance

Don Bell s Table Egg Layer Flock Projections and Economic Commentary

Objectives. Materials TI-73 CBL 2. Strainer. Gravel

REARING LAYING HENS IN A BARN SYSTEM WITHOUT BEAK TRIMMING: THE RONDEEL EXAMPLE

BEYOND MENDEL. Incomplete Dominance: Blue (BB) Red (RR) F 1 hybrids have appearance in between 2 parents Purple (BR)

Mendelian Genetics Using Drosophila melanogaster Biology 12, Investigation 1

Note: The following article is used with permission of Dr. Sonia Altizer.

Patriot Assistance Dogs

Agvet Chemicals Task Group Veterinary Prescribing and Compounding Rights Working Group

Integration of Embryonic Zebrafish and Passive Sampling Device Extracts to Explore Mixture Toxicity

The Scottish Government SHEEP AND GOAT IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY GUIDANCE FOR KEEPERS IN SCOTLAND

Rat Control & Water Vole Conservation

TEACHERS TOPICS A Lecture About Pharmaceuticals Used in Animal Patients

BIOTRANSFORMATION, A NEW APPROACH TO AMINOGLYCOSIDE BIOSYNTHESIS : II GENTAMICIN. R.T. TESTA and B.C. TILLEY

Pre-natal construction of neural circuits (the highways are genetically specified):

Chemical Residue Testing and the Role of Proficiency Testing Material at the Centre for Veterinary Drug Residues

Transcription:

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS AND METHODS In order to estimate the relative intensity of the mrna labeling, we compared the signal in each brain region with that produced by the [ 14 C] microscales included in each film cassette. Each microscale, which is calibrated for the auto-absorptive features of intact brain grey matter (ref), contains ten values spanning 0.1 100 nci/g tissue of tissueequivalent [ 14 C] concentration. Each of the ten values represents an approximate doubling of the estimated activity (nci/g of tissue). It was not our intention to quantify the absolute levels of signal but rather to compare the relative intensites among birds and brain regions. The signal in each labeled region was therefore estimated by comparing its optical density directly to that produced by the microscale. The digitized images of each film were opened in Photoshop CS v.8.0 and the portion containing the microscale signal was selected, copied, and pasted onto a new layer so that it could be placed anywhere on the image. For all of the films from the sparrow studies, the optical density (judged by eye) of the film itself, in areas without brain sections, was equivalent to the fifth darkest level on the microscales. That value on the microscale was therefore assigned a relative value of 0, and the remaining four darker values were assigned values 1-4 from lightest to darkest (Fig. 1). Thus, the most intense signal produced by the microscale was assigned a value of 4. The signal in each labeled brain region (signal obviously darker than in the surrounding tissue) was estimated by positioning the image of the microscale immediately adjacent to it. In every case, the signal intensity could either be matched unambiguously to one of the values 1-4 in the microscale, or the signal was darker than 4. In the latter case, the brain region was assigned a value of 5. Note that 5 refers to all labeling greater than the darkest value on the film image of the microscale and we therefore could not detect variation in the signal above this value. In no case did the signal fall clearly between two values on the microscale; all labeled regions in each bird could be unambiguously matched to a whole number between 1 and 5. The signal intensities for the zebra finches were estimated as described above for the sparrows, except that for the finches, the background on the films was equivalent to the sixth darkest value on the microscales. Thus, that value was deemed 0 and there were five levels of detectable signal (1-5 from lightest to darkest) represented on the microscales rather than four (Fig. 1). Because there was no signal that clearly exceeded the top level (deemed 5 ) on the microscale for the finches, it was not necessary to assign higher values. As for the sparrows, each labeled region in each bird could be unambiguously matched to an intensity corresponding to a whole number between 1 and 5. All values for both the sparrows and the finches were assigned by the same person (DLM) using the same computer, monitor, and ambient lighting conditions. In order to show that individual variation in signal intensity was not explained by overall lighter or darker values throughout the brains of some individuals, we performed the following analysis separately for each species and mrna. First, the median signal intensity was calculated for each brain region. Then, the values for each individual were subtracted from each median. This calculation resulted in a series of difference scores for each individual, one score per brain region, representing how much ligher or darker the region was in that individual compared to the others. The difference scores were then

averaged across regions for each individual to estimate the degree to which the values from each individual tended to be higher or lower than the group medians. For the sparrows, all average difference scores were zero for all individuals and all mrnas, showing that there were no birds for which the labeling was uniformly lighter or darker than the others. All sparrows were therefore included in the subsequent analyses for all three mrnas. For the finches, the calculation of difference scores revealed one male in the VT1 study and another in the VT3 study with lower than average signal intensities overall. Those males were excluded from subsequent analysis only for the mrna for which their values were low. We next inspected the ranges of signal intensities in each brain region for each mrna in order to identify regions with notable individual variation. Ranges of one unit or less (e.g. 2-3 or 3-4) were not considered notable and those cases were not investigated further. For each mrna, the values for every region in which the range spanned two or more units (e.g. 2-4) were (1) plotted in a histogram to show the varation and (2) subjected to a Mann-Whitney U test to determine whether the variation was explained by sex differences. The histograms, MWU and P values are shown in Supplemental Figs. 2-5.

Supplemental Table 1 (see next page). Partial amino acid sequences of zebra finch and sparrow receptors VT1, VT2 (V1b), VT3 (OT-like), and VT4 (V1a) aligned with published sequences of nonapeptides receptors in other species. The locations of transmembrane (TM) domains are approximate. Nonpolar neutral residues are shown in red, polar neutral in green, polar positive in purple and polar negative in blue. Residues involved in ligand binding, i.e. the binding pocket [1] are indicated in bold. Residues thought to be important for ligand specificity [2, 3, 4] are highlighted with white lettering. Sequence between the N-terminus and TMII is not shown because our cloned fragments did not contain that region. Our zebra finch VT2 receptor sequence ended at residue 212, so the rest of that sequence has been filled in from the published sequence (XM_002195382). 1. Chini B, Mouillac B, Ala Y, Balestre MN, Trumpp-Kallmeyer S, Hoflack J, Elands J, Hibert M, Manning M, Jard S, Barberis C 1995 Tyr115 is the key residue for determining agonist selectivity in the V1a vasopressin receptor. EMBO J 14:2176-2182 2. Chini B, Mouillac B, Balestre MN, Trumpp-Kallmeyer S, Hoflack J, Hibert M, Andriolo M, Pupier S, Jard S, Barberis C 1996 Two aromatic residues regulate the response of the human oxytocin receptor to the partial agonist arginine vasopressin. FEBS Lett 397:201-206 3. Cotte N, Balestre MN, Aumelas A, Mahé E, Phalipou S, Morin D, Hibert M, Manning M, Durroux T, Barberis C, Mouillac B 2000 Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding. Eur J Biochem 267:4253-4263 4. Tahtaoui C, Balestre MN, Klotz P, Rognan D, Barberis C, Mouillac B, Hibert M. Brownstein MJ, Saito N, MacLeod V, Baeyens DA, Mayeux PR 2003 Identification of the binding sites of the SR49059 nonapeptide antagonist into the V1a vasopressin receptor using sulfydryl-reactive ligands and cysteine mutants as chemical sensors. J Biol Chem 278:40010-40009

TMII TMIII TMIV Chicken VT1 LSIADLVVAFFQVLPQLIWDITDVFIGPDFLCRIIKYLQLLGMFASTYMIVVMTVDRYQAVCYPMVTFQKKRALWNIPICTSWSISLILSLPQVFIFS-- 181 Zebra finch VT1 --------PFFQVLPQLIWDITDVFIGPDFLCRIIKYLQLLGMFASTYMIVVMTVDRYQAVCYPMVTFQKKRALWNIPICSSWSIALILSLPQVFILS-- 90 Sparrow VT1 LSIADLVVAFFQVLPQLIWDITDVFIGPDFLCRIIKYLQLLGMFASTYMIVVMTVDRYQAVCYPMVTFQKKRALWNFPICSSWSIALILSLPQVFIFS-- 103 Lungfish VT1 LSLADLVVAFFQVLPQLCWEVTYRFYGPDILCRIVKHLQVMGMFASTYMLVIMTVDRYIAICHPLKTLQQPTKRSYMMIITAWVGSFVLSTPQYFIFS-- 178 Flounder VTR LSLADLVVAFFQVLPQLCWEITYRFFGPDFLCRIVKHLQVTGMFASTYMMVMMTLDRYIAICHPLKTLQQPTQRSYIMIVSTWMCSLVFSTPQYFIFS-- 163 Pupfish V1a LSLADLVVAFFQVLPQLCWEVTFRFYGPDFLCRIVKHLQVLGMFASTYMMVMMTLDRYIAICHPLQTLQQPTRRAYIMISSTWACSLVLSTPQYCIFS-- 188 Bullfrog VTR LSLADLVVAFFQVLPQLCWEITYRFYGPDFLCRIIRHLQVFGMFASTYMLVVMTADRYIAICHPLKTLHQPTKRSYLMIGSAWIISFILSTPQYGIFY-- 198 Rat V1a LSLADLAVAFFQVLPQLCWDITYRFRGPDWLCRVVKHLQVFAMFASAYMLVVMTADRYIAVCHPLKTLQQPARRSRLMIATSWVLSFILSTPQYFIFSVI 192 Human V1a LSLADLAVAFFQVLPQMCWDITYRFRGPDWLCRVVKHLQVFGMFASAYMLVVMTADRYIAVCHPLKTLQQPARRSRLMIAAAWVLSFVLSTPQYFVFS-- 190 Chicken VT4 LSLADLVVAFFQVLPQLCWEVTHRFHGPDGLCRVVKHLQVFGMFASAYMLVAMTADRYIAVCHPLKTLQQPTKRSYAMIAAAWALSLLLSTPQYFIFS- 197 Zebra finch VT4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------SYGMIAAAWALSLLLSTPQYFIFS-- 42 Sparrow VT4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------SYGMIAAAWALSLLLSTPQYFIFS-- 42 Newt V1b LGLTDLVVAGFQVLPQMIWDITFRFVGSDLLCRAVKYFQVLSMFASTYMLIMMTVDRYIAVCHPLKTLQQPSRQAYLMIGATWLISSLLSLPQIFIFS-- 82 Rat V1b LALTDLGVALFQVLPQLLWDITYRFQGSDLLCRAVKYLQVLSMFASTYMLLAMTLDRYLAVCHPLRSLRQPSQSTYPLIAAPWLLAAILSLPQVFIFS-- 160 Human V1b LALTDLAVALFQVLPQLLWDITYRFQGPDLLCRAVKYLQVLSMFASTYMLLAMTLDRYLAVCHPLRSLQQPGQSTYLLIAAPWLLAAIFSLPQVFIFS-- 173 Chicken VT2 LALSDLGVALFQVLPQMLWEVTYRFAGPDLLCRAVKYLQVLSMFASTYMLMAMTLDRYVAVCHPLRTLRRPGRQPCAMVGAAWLLSCLLSTPQIFIFS-- 183 Zebra finch VT2 ---------------QLLWKVTYRFLGPDPLCRAVKYLQVLSMFASTY-L-VMTLDRYLAVCHPLQSLQQPSRQAYAMIGATWLLSCLLSLPQVFIFS-- 80 Sparrow VT2 ---------------QLLWKVTYRFLGPDPLCRAVKYLQVLSMFASTYMLMVMTLDRYLAVCHPLQSLQQPSRQAYTMIGLTWLLSCLLSLPQVFIFS-- 79 Bullfrog MTR LSIADLVVALFQVLPQLIWDITFRFYAPDIMCRLVKYLQVVGMFAPTYMLLLMSLDRCLAVCQPLRSLHRRSD--CVYVLVTWIISFLLSIPQIVIFS-- 176 Sheep OTR LSIADLAVAVFQVLPQLLWDITFRFYGPDLLCRLVKYLQVVGMFASTYLLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLRRRTD--RLAVLATWLGCLVASAPQVHIFS-- 176 Human OTR LSIADLVVAVFQVLPQLLWDITFRFYGPDLLCRLVKYLQVVGMFASTYLLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLRRRTD--RLAVLATWLGCLVASAPQVHIFS-- 176 Macaque OTR LSIADLVVAVFQVLPQLLWDITFRFYGPDLLCRLVKYLQVVGMFASTYLLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLRRRTD--RLAVLATWLGCLVASAPQVHIFS-- 176 Rat OTR LSIADLVVAVFQVLPQLLWDITFRFYGPDLLCRLVKYLQVVGMFASTYLLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLRRRTD--RLAVLGTWLGCLVASAPQVHIFS-- 176 Tammar wallaby MTR LSIADLVVAVFQVLPQLLWDITFHFYGPDFLCRLVKYLQVVGMFASTYLLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLRRQSD--HLSVLCTWLVCLVVSVPEIQIFS-- 143 Chicken VT3 LSIADLVVAVFQVLPQLIWDITFRFYGPDFLCRLIKYLQVVGMFASTYMLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLHRRAD--RVSVLLTWLLCLLVSIPQIHIFS-- 182 Zebra finch VT3 --------------------ITFRFYGPDFLCRLIKYLQVVGMFASTYMLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLHRRAD--RVSVLLTWLLCLLVSIPQIHIFS-- 77 Sparrow VT3 --------------------ITFRFYGPDFLCRLIKYLQVVGMFASTYMLLLMSLDRCLAICQPLRSLHRRAD--RVSVLLTWLLCLLVSIPQIHIFS-- 76 TMV Chicken VT1 KIEISPG--IFECWAEFIQPWGPRAYVTWILVVIFFIPSTILITCQVKICKIIKRNIYVKKQNEYQVTN-------------------QK--QVLPSRAS 258 Zebra finch VT1 KTEISPG--VFECWGEFIQPWGPRAYVTWIFVVIFFIPSAILITCQVKICKIIRRNINVKKQNECDAT--------------------KRN-QVLPSRAS 167 Sparrow VT1 -- KTEISPG--VFECWGEFIQPWGPRAYVTWIFVVIFFIPSAILITCQVKICKIIRRNINVKK-NECEATN---------------------QNQVLPSRAS 179 Lungfish VT1 LTEVKNGSDVHDCWANFIMPWGAKAYITWITFGIFIIPVIILTTCYGFICHSIWRNIKCKTRQGMSEY-------------------ALKNGLMP-SCVS 258 Flounder VTR LSEVKNGSTVKDCWAHFIEPWGARAYITWITGGIFLVPVVILVMCYGFICHTIWKNIKYKKRKTIPG-------------------AASKNGLIGKNSVS 244 Pupfish V1a LSEVRPGSAVYDCWGHFVEPWGPRAYITWITAGIFLVPVAVLVFCYGFICRAIWRNLKCKTRRKSADAVV-------------EAT---KSGILGRSSVS 272 Bullfrog VTR LKDLGDG--VYDCWADFISPKGLKAYITWITISIFVVPVIILLTCYGFICYNIWRNIKCKTKRGETD-------------------RKRSNGLL-STSVS 276 Rat V1a EIEVNNGTKTQDCWATFIQPWGTRAYVTWMTSGVFVAPVVVLGTCYGFICYHIWRNIRGKTASSRHSKG-DK--------GSGEAVGPFHKGLLVTPCVS 283 Human V1a MIEVNNVTKARDCWATFIQPWGSRAYVTWMTGGIFVAPVVILGTCYGFICYNIWCNVRGKTAS-RQSKGAE-QAG-----------VAFQKGFLLAPCVS 277 Chicken VT4 LSEVERGSRVYDCWAHFIMPWGPRAYITWITGGIFVAPVLILATCYGFICFRIWRS-ARGRARPGEAAGGG-----------------PRRGLLLAPCVS 279 Zebra finch VT4 LSEVERGSQVYDCWAHFIMPWGPRAYITWITGGIFIAPVLILIICYGFICYRIWRN-RGK----------------------------------LAPCVS 107 Sparrow VT4 LSEVERGSQVYDCWAHFIMPWGPRAYITWITGGIFIAPVLILIICYGFICYRIWRNVRGKT--RPGEAAAAAGGRRAGDEGG------PRRGLLLAPCVS 126 Newt V1b LREVSKGSGIIDCWAEFHFNWGAKAYVTWTTMSIFVIPVIVLVVCYSLITYEICKNLKGKTQTGRSENG---------------CYRGQG----MPSRVS 163 Rat V1b LREVIQGSGVLDCWADFYFSWGPRAYITWTTMAIFVLPVAVLTACYGLICHEIYKNLKVKTQAGREERRGWRTWDKSSSS---AATRG------LPSRVS 251 Human V1b LREVIQGSGVLDCWADFGFPWGPRAYLTWTTLAIFVLPVTMLTACYSLICHEICKNLKVKTQAWRVGGGGWRTWDRPSPSTLAATTRG------LPSRVS 267 Chicken VT2 LREVQPGSGVLDCWADFGYPWGARAYITWTTLCIFLLPVGILTACYSLICREICKNLKGKTQSCTPVAGGL---LAASPSAPCCSQKGSQCPSGQPSRVS 280 Zebra finch VT2 LREVRPGSGVLDCWADFGYPWGARAYITWTTLCVFVLPVGVLSVCYSLICHEICKNLKGKTQSSAPGSGGA---TVAAPAGPSPAGKG-----GQPSRVS 172 Sparrow VT2 LREVRPGSGVLDCRADFGYPWGARAYITWTTLCIFVLPVGVLSVCYSIICHEICKNLKGKTQSGAPGTGGA---AVGAPGGANPAGKG-----GQPSRVS 171 Bullfrog MTR LTSVGNG--VHDCLADFIQPWGLKAYITWITLSVYIIPVLILSVCYGLISFKIWQNIRLKTVCESNLRL--------------SSNK-----RATLSRVS 255 Sheep OTR LREVADG--VFDCWAVFIQPWGPKAYITWITLAVYIVPVIVLAACYGLISFKIWQNLRLKTEAAAAEAAAGAEGAAADCAG-----------RAALARVS 263 Human OTR LREVADG--VFDCWAVFIQPWGPKAYITWITLAVYIVPVIVLAACYGLISFKIWQNLRLKTAAAAAAEA-------------PEGAAAGDGGRVALARVS 261 Macaque OTR LREVADG--VFDCWAVFIQPWGPKAYITWITLAVYIVPVIVLAACYGLISFKIWQNLRLKTAAAAAAEA-------------PEGAAAGDGGRMALARVS 261 Rat OTR LREVADG--VFDCWAVFIQPWGPKAYVTWITLAVYIVPVIVLAACYGLISFKIWQNLRLKTAAAAAAAE------------GND-AAGG-AGRAALARVS 260 Tammar wallaby MTR LREVSQG--VYDCWAVFIQPWGPKAYITWITLTVYIIPVLVLSACYGLISFKIWQNLKLKTAHEPRAVG---------LWPHLLPVRADVSNAAALSRVS 232 Chicken VT3 LRDVGNG--VYDCWADFIQPWGPKAYVTWITLMVYIIPVLMLSVCYGLISFKIWQNVKLKTAHGPPGGQ-------------SSTARGG----AAFARVS 263 Zebra finch VT3 LRDVGNG--VYDCWADFIQPWGPKAYVTWITLMVYIIPMLMLSICYGLISSKIWQNVKLKTAHGPSVGL-------------GSGSRGG----VVFARVS 158 Sparrow VT3 LRDVGNG--VYDCWADFIQPWGPKAYVTWITLMVYIIPMLMLSICYGLISFKIWQNVKLKTAHGPSVGL-------------GSGSRGG----VVFARVS 157 TMVI TMVII Chicken VT1 SVNCISKAMIKTVKMTIVTVVAYVLCWSPFFIAQLWSVWFPSGITEGS---AFTIIMLLGNLNSCTNPWIYMYFCGHIPYCTNKQLENTSAQ------ED 349 Zebra finch VT1 SVNCISKAMIKTVKMTVVTVVAYVLCWSPFFIAQLWSVWFPSILTEGS---TFTIIMLLGNLNSCANPWIYMYFCGQIPYCTNKQLENASAQ------EE 258 Sparrow VT1 SVNCISKAMIRTVKMTVVTVVAYVLCWSPFFIAQL-SVWFPSILTEGS---AFTIIMLLGNLNSCANPWIYMYFCGQIPHCTSKQLENTSAQ------EE 270 Lungfish VT1 SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVVAYIVCWAPFFIVQMWSVWDDQFSWDESENTAVTVSALLASLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDFIQCFPCCQKLQQALHEEE 358 Flounder VTR SVTTISRAKLRTVKMTFVIVLAYIICWAPFFTVQMWSVWDENFQYADSENTAVTISALLASLNSCCNPWIYMIFSGHLLQDFMNCFAWCRRANADFKKED 344 Pupfish V1a SVSTISRAKLRTVKMTFVIVVAYVVCWAPFFTVQMWSVWDKTFSWDDSENTAVSLSALLASLNSCCNPWIYMTFSGHLLQDFMHCFSCCYRLRDKLKKQD 372 Bullfrog VTR SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVTAYIICWTPYFTIQMWSVYADNTNWIENENTVVTVSALLASLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDFILSVLCCSRFKHNLSKED 376 Rat V1a SVKSISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVSAYILCWAPFFIVQMWSVWDENFIWTDSENPSITITALLASLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDCVQSFPCCHSMAQKFAKDD 383 Human V1a SVKSISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVTAYIVCWAPFFIIQMWSVWDPMSVWTESENPTITITALLGSLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDCVQSFPCCQNMKEKFNKED 377 Chicken VT4 GVKTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVSAYVVCWAPFFTIQMWSVWDQHFPWVDSENTATTVTALLASLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDCVQSFPCCQKIKQTLSKED 379 Zebra finch VT4 NVKTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVSVYVVCWAPFFTIQMWSVWDQRFPWVDSENTATTVTALLASLNSCCNPWIY-FFSGHPLQDCLQSFP------------- 193 Sparrow VT4 NVKTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVSVYVVCWAPFFTIQMWSVWDQRFPWVDSENTATTVTALLASLNSCCNPWIYMFFSGHLLQDCLQSFP------------- 213 Newt V1b SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVLAYVLCWTPFFSVQMWSVWDENAPNEESSDFAFTITMLLASLSSCCNPWIYMFFSGRVLQDVLGYVSCCRSSRRSLRRQN 263 Rat V1b SISTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVLAYIACWAPFFSVQMWSVWDENAPNEDSTNVAFTISMLLGNLSSCCNPWIYMGFNSRLLPRSLSHHACCTGSKPQVHRQL 351 Human V1b SINTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVLAYIACWAPFFSVQMWSVWDKNAPDEDSTNVAFTISMLLGNLNSCCNPWIYMGFNSHLLPRPLRHLACCGGPQPRMRRRL 367 Chicken VT2 SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVVAYVACWAPFFSMQMWSVWDEDAPDDESADAAFTITMLLASLSSCCNPCIYMFFSGRPLQDTARCLALWGCPPSAPRRQG 380 Zebra finch VT2 SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVAAYVTCWAPFFSVQMWSVWDQDAPDEESTNVAFSITMLLASLSSCCNPWIYLFFSGHLLQDAGRCRGCWGRPRAGLRRAN 272 Sparrow VT2 SVRTISRAKIRTVKMTFVIVAAYVTCWAPFFSVQMWSVWD------------------------------------------------------------ 212 Bullfrog MTR SVRLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAYIICWTPFFYVQMWSVWDPEAPKEAS---LFIIAMLLGSLNSCCNPWIYMLFTGHLFHDLLQRLLCCSARYLKAKQQG 352 Sheep OTR NVKLISKAKIRTVKMTFIVVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDADAPKEAS---AFIIAMLLASLNSCCNPWIYTLFTGHLFQDLVQRFLCCSFRRLKGSQPG 360 Human OTR SVKLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDANAPKEAS---AFIIVMLLASLNSCCNPWIYMLFTGHLFHELVQRFLCCSASYLKGRRLG 358 Macaque OTR SVKLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDANAPKEAS---AFIIVMLLASLNSCCNPWIYMLFTGHLFHELVQRFLCCSASYLKGNRLG 358 Rat OTR SVKLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDVNAPKEAS---AFIIAMLLASLNSCCNPWIYMLFTGHLFHELVQRFFCCSARYLKGSRPG 357 Tammar wallaby MTR SVKLISKAKIRTIKMTFIVVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDPDAPKE------------------------------------------------------ 278 Chicken VT3 STRLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDTNAPQEAS---PFIIAMLLASLNSCCNPWIYMLYTGHLFHDLMRRFLCCSARYLKAR-PA 359 Zebra finch VT3 STRLISKAKIRAVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFF-VQMWSVWDSNAPQEAS---PFIIAMLLASLNSCCNPWIY----------------------------- 226 Sparrow VT3 STRLISKAKIRTVKMTFIIVLAFIVCWTPFFFVQMWSVWDSNAPQEAS---PFIIAMLLASLNSCCNPWIYI---------------------------- 226

Supplemental Fig. 1. Comparison of in situ hybridization signal seen with antisense riboprobes (A, C) and sense (control) riboprobes (B, D). For most mrnas in both species, no signal was observed with the sense riboprobe. For example, compare the signal obtained with the antisense VT3 riboprobe (A) to that obtained with the sense VT3 riboprobe (B) in white-throated sparrow. In some cases, for example VT2 receptor mrna, identical signal was obtained in the cerebellum with both sense and antisense probes (not shown) and was thus considered nonspecific. Only one sense riboprobe produced a discernable signal that overlapped with antisense signal outside the cerebellum: in sparrow, weak labeling was obtained using the VT4 (V1a) sense riboprobe (D; compare to antisense in C). The same distribution of VT4 receptor mrna was observed using a second antisense riboprobe containing a different region of the VT4 receptor sequence (shown in Fig. 10F). Note that the distribution of labeling in D is quite different from the VT3 receptor distribution in an adjacent section from the same brain (A).

Supplemental Fig. 2. Histograms showing individual variation in intensity of VT1 mrna signal in white-throated sparrow. Medians (Mdn) and ranges are given for each region, as well as the results (MWU and P values) of a comparison between males and females. There were no sex differences in any of the regions of interest. Regions are listed in the order they appear in Table 2.

Supplemental Fig. 3. Histograms showing individual variation in intensity of VT3 mrna signal in white-throated sparrow. Medians (Mdn) and ranges are given for each region, as well as the results (MWU and P values) of a comparison between males and females. There were no sex differences in any of the regions of interest. Regions are listed in the order they appear in Table 2.

Supplemental Fig. 4. Histograms showing individual variation in intensity of VT4 mrna signal in white-throated sparrow. Medians (Mdn) and ranges are given for each region, as well as the results (MWU and P values) of a comparison between males and females. There were no sex differences in any of the regions of interest. Regions are listed in the order they appear in Table 2.

Supplemental Fig. 5. Histograms showing individual variation in intensity of VT receptor mrna signal in zebra finch. Medians (Mdn) and ranges are given for each region, as well as the results (MWU and P values) of a comparison between males and females. There were no sex differences in any of the regions of interest. Within each mrna, regions are listed in the order they appear in Table 2.