7 Factors to Consider in a Child Dog Bite Case
|
|
- Julian Wade
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 7 Factors to Consider in a Child Dog Bite Case The majority of seriously injured dog bite victims in the United States are children. Representing them presents certain challenges, from countering accusations of provocation to ensuring witness testimony is reliable. These issues can make or break your case. By Ke n n e t h M. P h i l l i p s Reprinted from Trial (December 2016) American Association for Justice, Formerly Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA ) 26 D e ce mb e r Trial Feat 2 Phillips.indd 26 FOTO 76/SHUTTERSTOCK 11/4/16 5:14 PM
2 Children are the most common victims of serious dog bite injuries in the United States, making up one-third of all emergency room (ER) visits for dog bites. 1 The cost of medical treatment ranges from several hundred dollars for an ER visit to an average of $18,200 for hospitalization. 2 While one would expect dog owners and their liability insurers to pay the greater portion of these medical bills, government sources pay them almost half the time. 3 In fact, of the 885,000 Americans who are treated for dog bite injuries annually, 4 only about 16,000 a mere 2 percent are compensated by liability insurance companies. 5 But you can shift more of the health care burden to dog owners and liability insurers. Here are strategies for tackling seven of the most challenging issues in a child dog bite case. 1 Strict Liability and Bad Conduct Two-thirds of states have statutes imposing strict liability for dog bites to people. 6 While this may be helpful at the negotiating table, it has mixed results at trial: Strict liability occasionally results in jurors declining to award full damages even if the defendant takes full responsibility because the verdict is independent of the defendant s negligence or intent. To overcome this, look for bad conduct showing that the defendant was irresponsible, negligent, or reckless: for example, evidence that the defendant violated an animal control ordinance like a leash law. 7 In a so-called one bite state, the statutory violation may be your client s only basis for compensation because it constitutes evidence of negligence or depending on the jurisdiction a presumption of negligence. 8 2Subsequent Torts Another strategy is to plead a subsequent tort claim, if the circumstances fit. For example, I once represented a young Trial December
3 Premises Liability 7 Factors to Consider in a Child Dog Bite Case boy attacked by his neighbors off-leash dog. The child had to pass his neighbors house to get to school. After the attack, the dog owners retaliated for the anticipated lawsuit by letting their dog loose in the street during the times of day the child was likely to pass by their house, terrorizing the boy. My complaint included counts for the dog attack, as well as willful infliction of emotional distress with a demand for punitive damages. We settled quickly. 3Suits Against Friends and Family In the majority of cases, the owners of the dog that attacked the child are friends, family members, or neighbors. 9 This can make jurors uncomfortable people generally believe that families, friends, and neighbors shouldn t sue each other. Approached delicately, however, these defendants often help the case rather than hurt it. Many times, they willingly accept blame for the accident because they want the victim to be compensated. They might cry when describing the child s agony and painful recovery. At their depositions, they frequently disclose important information about who saw the accident and what the witnesses will testify to. In these cases, argue that the relationship created a greater moral obligation for the defendant to protect the child. Similarly, argue that the breach of this duty caused the child to sustain deep emotional harm. 4 WOUND EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS Children as Witnesses When a dog bites a child, often the only witnesses are other children. If possible, videotape the young witnesses giving a statement within days of the Ron Berman All dog bites are serious, but there is a difference between offensive and defensive aggression that appears in both the dynamics of an attack and the type, depth, location, and number of bite wounds. If the plaintiff was the only witness or the dog has been euthanized, bite wounds may be your only evidence. Defensive aggression. Someone who provokes a dog for example, by stepping on the dog s tail or putting his or her face close to the dog s face may receive a single defensive, inhibited bite. The dog controls the bite s severity because it simply wants to remove a threat. One quick bite usually creates enough distance between the dog and the threat, and the dog displays no further aggression. Offensive attacks. In these instances, the victim s actions before the attack were unlikely to cause a dog bite and, as such, these are unprovoked attacks. If the bite involves one of the three following factors, it is considered serious from a behavioral standpoint: multiple wounds on different areas of the victim s body; shaking, where the dog bites fully with its upper and lower canines, resulting in opposing wound patterns and bruising around the wound; and the dog s unwillingness to end the attack on its own. Attacks involving all three factors can be the most serious as they indicate an extremely violent attack but usually, only one or two factors are present. 28 December 2016 Trial History of aggression. To thoroughly investigate a past history of aggression, obtain documents for all the dogs involved, including veterinary, animal control, grooming, and kenneling records, and any witness and first responder reports. Interviewing neighbors or anyone who had contact with the dog before the attack also can produce vital evidence about the dog s history and the owner s or handler s knowledge. Not all forms of past aggression will be helpful to your case. Canine aggression has many forms: dominance, territorial, protective, and maternal aggression, among others. A dog s past aggression may not support your case unless the type of aggression directly relates to the attack. For example, evidence that the defendant s dog has attacked other dogs or animals is not useful unless the attack on your client involved another dog. Aggression also may be situational. If the dog once bit someone who was trying to take the dog s food away (food aggression), that evidence will only have weight if your client was bitten in the presence of food. When bite wounds are the only physical evidence in a dog bite case, it is critical to properly evaluate and analyze them. They nearly always offer a great deal of evidence about what happened, as well as the type and level of the dog s aggression. Ron Berman is a canine behavioral consultant and trainer specializing in dog bites and pet-related injuries in Manhattan Beach, Calif. He can be reached at ropaulber@earthlink.net. JUPITERIMAGES/THINKSTOCK
4 In the majority of cases, the owners of the dog that attacked the child are friends, family members, or neighbors. attack. This record in the children s own words is critical. Child witnesses often forget the details of an event, or the defense may try to manipulate the child s testimony at trial. In each video statement, meticulously establish the basics that the child saw the attack, understands the difference between truths and falsehoods, is telling the truth, and was not told what to say. Also get the details of what a child witness did not see. Before testifying or giving a statement to the defense, each child should view his or her own video to ensure accuracy children often repress painful memories. Be sensitive when taking a child s testimony at deposition and trial. If the child is a defense witness, two questions you should always ask during his or her deposition are, Tell me what your parents told you to say to me today, followed by, Do you remember it that way or are you saying it just because your parents told you to? The responses often reveal that the child was manipulated or coached. And don t forget the obvious. In one dog bite case, the defense relied largely on a six-year-old girl who supposedly would testify that my client, Brandon, provoked the dog. I began the girl s deposition by establishing that she knew who Brandon was. Then I asked, Do you remember that your dog bit Brandon? With a big smile on her face, she answered, No. I then asked a few follow-up questions to confirm that she had no recollection about what happened and quickly ended the deposition. No longer able to prove provocation, the defense eventually offered a very substantial settlement. 5 Provocation One of the cleanest fact patterns is the sneak attack: The dog bursts through a gate and, for no discernible reason, attacks a child who was not trespassing. 10 This scenario eliminates the defense of provocation, which can be the basis for comparative or contributory negligence or, if the child is old enough, completely defeat your case. 11 But when your young client has a history of being around the dog or was playing with the dog right before the attack, jurors might think the child provoked the animal. In these instances, find out whether the dog had a preexisting condition that increased the likelihood of an attack for example, if the dog was injured, unhealthy, not socialized, or had a history of biting. 12 Jurors may be biased against victims when other people provoked the dog. For example, jurors may sympathize with the dog owner if neighborhood children teased and treated the dog cruelly, even if your client was not involved. Bring a motion in limine to counter the prejudicial effect of such evidence. If the child was bitten while protecting his or her own dog from an attacking dog, defense attorneys often argue assumption of the risk and provocation. Counter this by arguing that because of the bond between them, your client could not stand idly by while another dog tried to harm his or her pet. If the victim was very young, add that he or she did not understand how dangerous it could be to intervene. 6Parental Supervision The parents of a bitten child occasionally face a counterclaim for inadequate supervision. In my experience, this defense tactic has never worked. To overcome it, show that the parents exercised the same degree of supervision that other parents would have. Nevertheless, it is critical to establish whether the parents knew there was an increased risk of a dog bite injury. At the initial interview, ask the child s parents whether the dog bit anyone before and, if so, whether they knew this information before or after the attack. If the ANNA ISSAKOVA/THINKSTOCK Trial December
5 Premises Liability 7 Factors to Consider in a Child Dog Bite Case incident happened on private property, take photographs to establish that no warning signs, such as Beware of Dog, were posted. Finally, ask if anyone verbally warned the child or his or her parents that the dog was bad with kids. Also consider whether the parents should have known that the particular situation would possibly result in an attack. For example, if the dog bite occurred at a pool party where children are splashing water, running around, and shouting a jury or insurance adjuster might blame the parents for not pulling their child out of the fray. 7 Third-Party Caretakers If a child is injured by a third party s dog while in the care of that person, assert a negligence claim based on 44 of The Restatement (Third) of Torts: An actor who, despite no duty to do so, takes charge of another who reasonably appears to be... helpless or unable to protect himself or herself has a duty to exercise reasonable care while the other is within the actor s charge. 13 A duty to protect children under one s care is established in the case law of most states, whether or not it has adopted the restatement. Argue that the defendant was doubly at fault both as the dog owner and the person charged with caring for the child. As a caretaker, this creates a special relationship and a heightened duty of care. Assert that when an adult hosts a playdate or sleepover but fails to pay attention, he or she is liable for any resulting injuries to the child. When representing children with dog bite injuries, it s important to recognize the intricacies of what can harm or help your case. Knowing how to overcome these obstacles will help your vulnerable clients and hold dog owners and handlers responsible. Kenneth M. Phillips is an attorney in Beverly Hills, Calif. He can be reached at ken@dogbite law.com. Copyright 2016 Kenneth M. Phillips. Notes 1. Children are more likely than adults to receive medical attention for dog bites and, among the very young, the majority of injuries are to the head, neck, and face. Ctrs. for Disease Control, Nonfatal Dog Bite- Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments United States, 2001, 52 Morbidity & Mortality Wkly. Rep. 605, 606 (July 4, 2003), mmwr/pdf/wk/mm5226.pdf; see also Laurel Holmquist & Anne Elixhauser, Emergency Department Visits and Inpatient Stays Involving Dog Bites, 2008, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Statistical Brief #101, at 2, 12 fig. 3 (Nov. 2010), www. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb101. pdf. 2. See Holmquist & Elixhauser, supra note 1, at 2, 9 tbl Stephen J. Strotmeyer et al., Dog Bite Injuries in Pennsylvania, 1995, at 1, fig. 9 (Ctr. for Violence & Injury Control 1999), citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi= &rep=rep1&type=pdf. 4. Julie Gilchrist et al., Dog Bites: Still a Problem? 14 Injury Prevention 296 (2008), injuryprevention.bmj.com/ content/14/5/296.abstract (based on a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey conducted during ). 5. Dog Bite Liability, Ins. Info. Inst. (May 2016), 6. See Kenneth M. Phillips, Statutory Strict Liability States, Dog Bite Law, dogbitelaw. com/3ua (listing the statutory strict liability states). 7. A leash law is a state statute or municipal or county ordinance that requires a dog, when off its owner s property, to be under restraint by a competent person, usually holding one end of the dog s leash but in some jurisdictions controlling the dog by voice. Always find out whether the leash was retractable almost all leash laws prohibit a physical leash greater than six feet in length. See Kenneth M. Phillips, Negligence Per Se for Violating a Leash Law or Other Animal Control Law, Dog Bite Law, dogbitelaw.com/legal-rights-of-dogbite-victims-in-usa/negligence-per-se-forviolating-a-leash-law-or-other-animalcontrol-law. 8. In the majority of states, the violation constitutes negligence per se. See, e.g., Brotemarkle v. Snyder, 221 P.2d 992 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950); Duffy v. Debhart, 157 A.2d 585 (Del. Super. Ct. 1960); Alex v. Armstrong, 385 S.W.2d 110 (Tenn. 1964). In a minority of states, it is only evidence of negligence. See, e.g., Moura v. Randall, 705 A.2d 334 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998); Butler v. Frieden, 158 S.E.2d 121 (Va. 1967). 9. Statistics go as high as 88 percent. See Alan M. Beck & Barbara A. Jones, Unreported Dog Bites in Children, 100 Pub. Health Rep. 315, (1985), nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc / pdf/pubhealthrep pdf; John Kennedy Bini et al., Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs, 253 Annals Surgery 791, 793 (Apr. 2011), www. researchgate.net/publication/ _ Mortality_Mauling_and_Maiming_by_ Vicious_Dogs. 10. Trespass is a good defense when the case is built on statutory liability because the wording of these laws usually makes them inapplicable to trespassers. See, e.g., N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 466:19 (2016) ( Any person to whom... damage may be occasioned by a dog not owned or kept by such person shall be entitled to recover damages from the person who owns, keeps, or possesses the dog, unless the damage was occasioned to a person who was engaged in the commission of a trespass or other tort. ). 11. The provocation defense may be found in a state s dog bite statute. See, e.g., Minn. Stat. Ann (West 2016) ( If a dog, without provocation, attacks or injures any person who is acting peaceably in any place where the person may lawfully be, the owner of the dog is liable in damages to the person so attacked or injured to the full amount of the injury sustained. ). Case law establishes that the defense also might be based on conduct that is intentional or unintentional. See, e.g., VonBehren v. Bradley, 640 N.E.2d 664 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994) (intentional conduct); Brans v. Extrom, 701 N.W.2d 163 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005) (per curiam) (unintentional conduct). 12. John C. Wright, Canine Aggression Toward People: Bite Scenarios and Prevention, in 21 Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 299, , (Amy R. Marder & Victoria L. Voith eds. 1991), cla.mercer.edu/mu-cla/psychology/ faculty/j_wright/upload/canine- Aggression-Toward-People.pdf (listing these factors as the most common reasons dogs bite). 13. Restatement (Third) of Torts: Physical & Emotional Harm 44 (2012). 30 December 2016 Trial
DOG BITE LAWS IN ALL 50 STATES
MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C. 1111 E. Sumner Street, P.O. Box 270670, Hartford, WI 53027 Phone: (262) 673-7850 Fax: (262) 673-3766 gwickert@mwl-law.com www.mwl-law.com DOG BITE LAWS IN ALL 50 STATES
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KATHY KOIVISTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION January 8, 2008 9:00 a.m. v No. 272943 Gogebic Circuit Court DAVE DAVIS d/b/a CHIEFTAN KENNELS, LC No. 05-000301-NO
More informationTEXAS DOG BITE CLAIMS
TEXAS DOG BITE CLAIMS C. Brooks Schuelke Schuelke Law Firm PLLC Table Of Contents Texas Dog Bite Problems 01 What Are Your Claims? 02 Does Texas Have A "One-Bite" Rule? 03 Make Your Claim As Soon As Possible
More informationArticle VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs
Sec. 7-53. Purpose. Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs Within the county of Santa Barbara there are potentially dangerous and vicious dogs that have become a serious and widespread
More informationArgued May 9, 2017 Decided September 5, Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationAN INSIDER S GUIDE DOG ATTACKS. Zinda Law Group, PLLC. Attorneys at Law
AN INSIDER S GUIDE DOG ATTACKS Zinda Law Group, PLLC Attorneys at Law 1 Zinda& Davis, PLLC All Rights Reserved Contact Information: Austin Area: *Principal Office* 8834 N. Capital of Texas Highway Suite
More informationDOG BITES 101 IN ARKANSAS. Recovery can be sought from not only the animal s owner, but sometimes from other responsible individuals as well
DOG BITES 101 IN ARKANSAS Recovery can be sought from not only the animal s owner, but sometimes from other responsible individuals as well Wesley A. Cottrell Each year, thousands of Americans suffer animal
More information(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:
505.16 VICIOUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS (a) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this section: (1) "Director of Public Safety" means the City official
More informationSUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.
SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WASHOE COUNTY CODE BY CLARIFYING THE MEANING OF
More informationChapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008
Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008 506.01 KEEPING DANGEROUS OR VICIOUS ANIMALS. No person shall keep, harbor or own any dangerous or vicious animal within the City of Lakewood,
More informationORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 07-3 RESOLUTION NO. 070620-4 APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS AND THE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
More informationIN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA
Filing # 35984288 E-Filed 12/29/2015 03:25:17 PM IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA BAY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL, Petitioner/Appellant vs. Case No.: 2015-2797-CC JOHNATHON JONES, Respondent/Appellee.
More information(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.
3-1-1 3-1-1 DEFINITIONS. In this title: (1) ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY means an animal control office owned, operated, leased or contracted by the city with authority over the area in which the dog is kept.
More informationCHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS
CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS SECTIONS: 2.20.010 DEFINITIONS 2.20.020 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS--DOGS WITHOUT PERMIT PROHIBITED 2.20.030 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS--DECLARATION
More informationSUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.
SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WASHOE COUNTY CODE BY CLARIFYING THE MEANING OF
More informationFIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-1481 DEBORAH DAVISON, Appellant, v. REBECCA BERG, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Steven M. Fahlgren, Judge. March
More informationReptiles on the Prowl
Reptiles on the Prowl Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP is the largest defense civil litigation firm based in Central Pennsylvania. With its main office in Harrisburg, PA, the firm
More informationEvaluation of XXXXXXX mixed breed male dog
Evaluation of XXXXXXX mixed breed male dog Evaluation at Paradise Pet 48 West Passaic Ave - Bloomfield, NJ on April 29, 2013 Conducted by Jeff Coltenback; assisted by Mike Trombetta Video by Diana Coltenback
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 190459-2 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 190459-2:n:01/25/2018:KBH/tgw LSA2018-479R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS:
More informationDOG BITE PREVENTION GUIDE
DOG BITE PREVENTION GUIDE BRIEF INTRODUCTION May is International Dog Bite Prevention Month. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4.5 million Americans are bitten by dogs
More informationRESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:
PROPOSED VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE: RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance: A. Definitions: Animal Control
More informationKachenkov v Vadala 2013 NY Slip Op 30971(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 12736/11 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New
Kachenkov v Vadala 2013 NY Slip Op 30971(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 12736/11 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationTOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted - April 7, 2009 Effective - May 7, 2009 Amended March 2, 2010 1 TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section 1. Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this ordinance
More informationSubject ANIMAL BITES, ABUSE, CRUELTY & SEVERE NEGLECT. 12 August By Order of the Police Commissioner
Subject Date Published Page 12 August 2017 1 of 7 By Order of the Police Commissioner POLICY 1. Animal Protection. It is the policy of the Baltimore Police Department (BPD), in concert with the Baltimore
More informationARTICLES THERE ARE NO BAD DOGS, ONLY BAD OWNERS: REPLACING STRICT LIABILITY WITH A NEGLIGENCE STANDARD IN DOG BITE CASES. By Lynn A.
ARTICLES THERE ARE NO BAD DOGS, ONLY BAD OWNERS: REPLACING STRICT LIABILITY WITH A NEGLIGENCE STANDARD IN DOG BITE CASES By Lynn A. Epstein* Should the law treat dogs as vicious animals or loving family
More informationFarmers' Liability for Their Animals
Agricultural publication G453 Reviewed October 1, 1993 Farmers' Liability for Their Animals Stephen F. Matthews and Michael Mowrer Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SUNSET GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationCHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG
CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE Sections: 6.10.010 Title 6.10.020 Applicability 6.10.030 Definitions 6.10.040 Defense 6.10.050 Declaration of
More informationTitle 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and
Title 6 Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC 8.10.040, 8.10.050, and 8.10.180. 6-1 Lyons Municipal Code 6.05.020 Chapter 6.05 Dangerous Dogs Sections:
More informationWADE S WIENERS BREEDING & BOARDING KENNELS BOARDING AGREEMENT
WADE S WIENERS BREEDING & BOARDING KENNELS BOARDING AGREEMENT OWNER S INFORMATION: Owner s Names: Address/City/State/Zip: Email Address: Phone: (Home) (Cell) _ Employment: (Phone) DOG S INFORMATION: Name:
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. 3. VICIOUS DOGS. CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business restricted.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 30, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D16-314 & 3D15-2609 Lower Tribunal No. 13-18732
More informationAttachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan
Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan City or Vicious/Aggressive /provisi ous to Toronto Notice of caution $240 ( off leash in park is $360 under Chapter 608, Parks. Barrie of aggressive : - means a which,
More information508.02 DEFINITIONS. When used in this article, the following words, terms, and phrases, and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates
More informationPage 47-1 rev
47.01 47.11(1) CHAPTER 47 ANIMAL CONTROL 47.01 Title. 47.02 Purpose. 47.03 Authority. 47.04 Administration. 47.05 Application. 47.06 Definitions. [47.07-47.10 reserved.] 47.11 Rabies Vaccinations Required.
More informationRunning at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.
504.00 ANIMAL CONTROL. 504.01 Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City. 504.02 Cats on leash. All cats within the City shall be on a leash unless
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 191591-3 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 SB232 2 3 4 ENROLLED, An Act, 5 Relating to dogs; to create Emily's
More information93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.
93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS. (A) Attack by an animal. It shall be unlawful for any person's animal to inflict or attempt to inflict bodily injury to any person or other animal whether or not the owner is present.
More informationORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.
LOWNDES COUNTY 1 ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. A. Domestic
More informationBY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS
BY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS BEING a By-law for prohibiting and regulating certain animals, the keeping of dogs within the municipality, for restricting the number of
More informationR.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16
Français Dog Owners Liability Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16 Consolidation Period: From January 1, 2007 to the e-laws currency date. Last amendment: 2006, c. 32, Sched. C, s. 13. Skip Table of Contents
More informationSTOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT DATE: January 17,2006 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Animal Calls Dead Animals Handling Injured Animals I. POLICY Field
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
ORDINANCE NO. 5769 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, current ordinances concerning the classification and disposition of dangerous
More informationTMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:
CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS Dangerous Dogs 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons Checklist 17-1 Script/Notes Definitions: Animal control authority is a municipal or county animal control office with authority over
More informationDangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents
Dangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents 1. Introduction and Definition 2. Legislation Relating to Dangerous Dogs 3. Assessing Risks to Children and Young People 4. Protection and Action to be
More informationAPPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE
APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE TOWN OF CLINTON DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 7, 2000 REVISED JUNE 8, 2004 SECTION l. PURPOSE: This ordinance is adopted in the exercise of municipal home
More informationc) Owners walking their dog( s) in public areas are required to pick up and properly dispose of stool waste deposited from their dog( s).
AN ORDINANCE Coupee, Regulating the ownership and possession of dogs and cats; including requirements for containment, care, vaccination, and registration, prohibiting running at large; authorizing seizure
More informationGALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE
GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1. Purpose and Legislative Findings. Uncontrolled dogs present a danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Gallatin County. The Gallatin
More informationDangerous Dogs and Texas Law
Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law ANDREW W. HAGEN JUDGE, MUNICIPAL COURT OF UVALDE 2015-2016 Texas Animal Statutes Health and Safety Code, Title 10, Health and Safety of Animals Sections 821 through 829 Chapter
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE NORTH LITTLE ROCK AND BEEBE, ARKANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ROADS, INC., RICHARD VENABLE, DARIUS SIMS, MIKE KIERRY and PHILLIP MCCORMICK PLAINTIFFS VS. NO. THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS AND CATS. CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business restricted. 10-103.
More informationDep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017)
Dep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017) Evidence established that two dogs, Jacob and Panda, are dangerous under the New York City Health Code because they
More informationLaw and Veterinary Medicine
Law and Veterinary Medicine Second Hour: Companion Animals, Cruelty Issues December 6, 2006 Paul Waldau, D.Phil., J.D. Objectives in Course Identify basic legal issues in veterinary medicine. These include
More informationDemi s Animal Rescue Foster Agreement (Dog)
Demi s Animal Rescue Foster Agreement (Dog) Date Animal s Name: Breed: Sex: Weight: Age: Microchip ID: Notes: The parties agree that the foster shall abide by the following conditions: 1. (Name) hereinafter
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION
BILL NO. 2005.68 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2005.76 AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS 2006.48, 2006.60 AND 2006.76 CONSOLIDATED VERSION BEING A BYLAW FOR THE LICENSING AND REGULATING
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION STONE S THROW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationAn Argument against Breed Specific Legislation
An Argument against Breed Specific Legislation Kasey Reynolds Writing 231 April 23, 2011 Most dog owners would agree that pets are like family; each with their own personality, responses, and personal
More informationCHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted 02/16/2000 Amended 05/19/2004 Amended 04/20/2011 Amended 05/07/2014 604-1 Purpose... 1 604-2 Definitions... 1 1. ABANDONED ANIMAL:... 1
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
Change 11, July 2, 2013 10-1 CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. 3. DANGEROUS DOGS. TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence,
More informationIC Chapter 4. Practice; Discipline; Prohibitions
IC 25-38.1-4 Chapter 4. Practice; Discipline; Prohibitions IC 25-38.1-4-1 Veterinary technician identification; use of title or abbreviation; advertising Sec. 1. (a) During working hours or when actively
More informationCITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW
CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF MEADOW LAKE TO REGISTER, LICENSE, REGULATE, RESTRAIN AND IMPOUND DOGS CITED AS THE DOG BYLAW. The Council of the City of Meadow Lake,
More informationCHAPTER 14 RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL
CHAPTER 14 RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL ARTICLE A Section 14-1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Definitions The following words, terms, and phrases when used in this Chapter shall have the meaning ascribed to them
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-15 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF DANGEROUS ANIMALS INCLUDING PIT BULL DOGS AND PROVIDING FOR REGISTRATION FOR CERTAIN DANGEROUS ANIMALS, AND PROVIDING
More informationPLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.
c t DOG ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 23, 2017. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationCORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-03 Section 1.1 Authority. SECTION 1 INTENT AND AUTHORITY These regulations are adopted by the Commissioners Court of Coryell County, Texas, acting in its capacity as the governing body
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS) The City Council of the City of Rice, Minnesota, hereby ordains that Section 405 (Dogs and Cats) of Chapter IV (Public Safety)
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS
ORDINANCE NO. 1365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS TITLE V SANITATION & HEALTH CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS ARTICLE 1 DOGS
More information2016 PA Super 52. Appellee No WDA 2014
2016 PA Super 52 JAMES AND MAUREEN FRANCISCUS, AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF FEMINA FRANCISCUS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellants TOLGA SEVDIK, AN INDIVIDUAL, ASHLEY DAILEY, AN INDIVIDUAL
More informationRHETORIC 49. A Born Killer? Leah Johnson
8240480_ch03_p040_079.qxd 8/6/08 11:16 PM Page 49 RHETORIC 49 Editor s Note When constructing an argument the author must consider how he or she will use ethos, pathos, and logos to appeal to an audience.
More informationTown of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151
Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151 ANIMAL ORDINANCE Ordinance # Whereby, the Town of Niagara, Marinette County, does hereby adopt Ordinance #, Animal Ordinance, for the purpose of regulating certain
More informationLocal Cockapoo Killed at the D.O.G. Boarding Facility in Putnam Valley
Local Cockapoo Killed at the D.O.G. Boarding Facility in Putnam Valley Letter by Susan Kahn Berman as published on scarsdale10583.com April 4, 2012 Dog Obedience Girl, LLC, d/b/a The D.O.G. Corrections
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
Change 3, September 20, 2016 10-1 CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. 3. VICIOUS DOGS. TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-2 WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect and to promote the general health and welfare of its citizens and is
More informationC. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.
5-2-1 5-2-1 CHAPTER 2 DOGS SECTION: 5-2-1: License Required; Exemption 5-2-2: License Fee 5-2-3: Term Of License 5-2-4: Publication Of Notice 5-2-5: Application For License 5-2-6: Restrictions And Prohibited
More informationROVER lindblade street culver city, ca t f (Please Print Clearly) Owner s Name ::
(Please Print Clearly) Owner s Name :: Address :: City :: State :: Zip :: Home Phone :: Business Phone :: Cell Phone :: Email :: Name of Dog(s) :: 1. 2. Breed(s) :: 1. 2. Weight :: 1. 2. Color :: 1. 2.
More informationBiting Beth Bradley All Bites are Not Created Equal Teaching Puppies Bite Inhibition
Biting Beth Bradley If you have a dog in your life, you know that domestic dogs retain some of the instincts and impulses of their canine ancestors: If it moves, chase it! If it stinks, roll in it! If
More informationRANKINGS STAT SHEET 2014: Category Veterinarian Reporting/Immunity
RANKINGS STAT SHEET 2014: Category 10 -- Veterinarian Reporting/Immunity Statistics: 1) Veterinary Reporting is : 15 states Veterinary Reporting is : 12 states 2) Veterinary Immunity (from reporting or
More informationDog Licensing Regulation
Ordinance No: 07-04 Dog Licensing Regulation STATE OF WISCONSIN Town of Morrison Brown County SECTION 1 TITLE/PURPOSE The title of this ordinance is the Town of Morrison Dog Licensing Regulation. The purpose
More informationClient Information. Doggie Information
Client Information Client (Person) Name: Emergency contact(s) & numbers: Street Address: City, State, Zip: Phone1: Phone2: Phone3: Email: Alternate contacts: Who is authorized to pick up/drop off your
More informationPresenters: Jim Crosby Canine aggression and behavior expert Retired Police Lieutenant Jacksonville, Florida
7 th NATIONAL ANIMAL CRUELTY PROSECUTION CONFERENCE 2017 Presenters: Diane Balkin Senior Staff Attorney Animal Legal Defense Fund Criminal Justice Program Denver, Colorado Jim Crosby Canine aggression
More informationIN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto
IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff Case No. 14 CRB 157 AIL -vs- JASON HARRIS Defendant MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANT, JASON HARRIS Pursuant to this Court's Order, Defendant, Jason
More informationPLEASE KEEP THIS PAGE FOR YOUR RECORDS
General Information about All Pets Dog Daycare DOGS ALL dogs must pass a temperament test prior to their first day of daycare. Temperament tests generally last 1 hour and an appointment is REQUIRED for
More informationOffice of Residence Life Service Animal Procedure
Office of Residence Life Service Animal Procedure Content: I. Procedure Statement 1 II. Definitions 1 III. Requesting a Service Animal 2 IV. Animal Health & Well-being 3 V. Conflicting Health Conditions
More information9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF MONTROSE, STATE OF COLORADO ORDINANCE CONCERNING CONTROL OF UNLEASHED OR UNCLAIMED DOGS ORDINANCE NO. 91-1 WHEREAS, C.R.S. 30-15-401(e), as amended,
More informationAnimal Control Ordinance
Animal Control Ordinance Town of York, Maine Most Recently Amended: May 19, 2012 Prior Dates of Amendment: November 2, 2010 May 20,2006 Date of Original Enactment: November 2, 1993 ENACTMENT BY THE LEGISLATIVE
More informationIN-CLASS ACTIVITY 1: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION EXERCISES
IN-CLASS ACTIVITY 1: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION EXERCISES 1 IN-CLASS ACTIVITY 1: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION EXERCISES Facts: Gabriel is a 11-year-old boy living in Cartagena, Colombia. Gabriel loves his pet
More informationCITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 1, 2, AND 8 OF THE CITY CODE TO IMPLEMENT NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING DOGS WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY OF STERLING
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY
E-FILED IN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 January 0 1: PM KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK NO: --0- SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY KEVIN R. BACKLUND and JANNETTE L. BACKLUND,
More informationCITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 1, 2, AND 8 OF THE CITY CODE TO IMPLEMENT NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING DOGS WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY OF STERLING
More informationLoretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )
Loretto City Code 600:00 CHAPTER VI ANIMALS (Repealed, Ord. 2010-03) Added, Ord. 2010-03) Section 600. PURPOSE. It is the intent of this chapter to establish regulations which will allow the keeping of
More informationPower Paws Assistance Dogs
Power Paws Assistance Dogs 1201 N. 85 th Pl. Ste. B101~ Scottsdale, AZ 85257 Phone 480-970-1322 ~ Fax 480-947-3090 www.azpowerpaws.org PUPPY RAISER APPLICATION Name Puppy Name Address Puppy s Date of Birth
More informationCity of Grand Island
City of Grand Island Tuesday, September 07, 2004 Study Session Item -2 Discussion Concerning Revisions to Dog Ordinances Staff Contact: Doug Walker City of Grand Island City Council Council Agenda Memo
More informationPOLICY REGARDING SERVICE AND EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL ACCESS TO UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FACILITIES, PROGRAMS, SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES
POLICY REGARDING SERVICE AND EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL ACCESS TO UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FACILITIES, PROGRAMS, SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES The University of Georgia ( UGA ) is committed to maintaining a fair
More informationCONSOLIDATION OF DOG ACT. R.S.N.W.T. 1988,c.D-7. (Current to: May 29, 2011)
CONSOLIDATION OF DOG ACT (Current to: May 29, 2011) AS AMENDED BY STATUTES ENACTED UNDER SECTION 76.05 OF NUNAVUT ACT: S.N.W.T. 1998,c.34 In force April 1, 1999 AS AMENDED BY NUNAVUT STATUTES: S.Nu. 2011,c.10,s.2
More information3 STAGES CANICROSS Dreistetten / AUSTRIA
www.run-to-the-sun.at 3 STAGES CANICROSS Dreistetten / AUSTRIA www.run-to-the-sun.at Infos Agenda Friday, 13 th April: 15:00-17:30 Check-In, bib - numbers 15:30 17:00 VET CHECK 17:45 START STAGE #1 Uphill
More informationPLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT
PLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT Owner(s) Address: Unit No: OF ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., SUN CITY CENTER, FLORIDA Identification
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION The Fairways at Emerald Greens Condominium
More informationThe Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth
The Corporation of the By-law 2002-045 (Consolidated as amended) DANGEROUS DOGS BY-LAW A by-law to provide for the muzzling of dogs declared dangerous in the. Consolidation Amendment No. 1 By-law No. 2005-075
More informationDamages. by Michael Kaiser Seattle Legal Research/Kaiser Legal Group
Damages by Michael Kaiser Seattle Legal Research/Kaiser Legal Group Michael.Kaiser@Kaiser-LegalGroup.org Damages caused by a dog-bite incident can be extensive. They can be both physical and psychological,
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
0- TITLE 0 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. CHAPTER IN GENERAL SECTION 0-0. Running at large prohibited. 0-02. Keeping near a residence or business restricted. 0-03. Pen or enclosure to be
More information