IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA
|
|
- Abel Benson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Filing # E-Filed 12/29/ :25:17 PM IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA BAY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL, Petitioner/Appellant vs. Case No.: CC JOHNATHON JONES, Respondent/Appellee. APPELLANT S BRIEF Jennifer W. Shuler, Esq. Bay County Assistant County Attorney Fla. Bar No W 11 th Street Panama City FL (850) Fax: (850) Attorney for Bay County
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CITATIONS... ii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS...1 STANDARD OF REVIEW...4 ARGUMENT...4 CONCLUSION...9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE...10 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE...10
3 TABLE OF CITATIONS CASES City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624, 626 (Fla. 1982)... 5 DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957)... 5 Florida State Racing Com. v. McLaughlin, 102 So.2d 574, (Fla. 1958)... 8 STATUTES , Fla.Stat... 3, 4, 6, , Fla.Stat.... 5, 7, , Fla.Stat.... 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, , Fla.Stat... 7 BAY COUNTY CODE Code , 4, 6, 7 Code , 8 Code , 4, 6, 7
4 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is an appeal of an Order by Special Magistrate Jonathan Dingus in a dangerous dog case involving Marley, a German Shepherd/Lab mix owned by Johnothan Jones. Citations to the record refer to the Amended Notice of Filing Record filed by Bay County on December 23, 2015, and will be made by the letter R, followed by the document number. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS Respondent, who resides at 2101 High Ave., Panama City, Florida, is the owner of the dog Marley whose designation as a dangerous dog in accordance with Bay County Code and Florida Statutes was upheld by the Special Magistrate on November 13, (R. 4) On September 26, 2015, Bay County Animal Control received a call from the Panama City Police Department that Marley, who is owned by Johnothan Jones, bit his girlfriend s 15 year old son, Taylor Freeman. See Report No. A (R. 1b). Johnothan Jones lives with Marley at the same residence as his girlfriend, Patricia Freeman, her 5 year old son Trenton and her 15 year old son Taylor. Mr. Jones 10 year old daughter Sophia also lives at the residence. After the September 26, 2015 attack by Marley, Taylor received treatment at Gulf Coast Emergency Room for multiple bit wounds and scratches. (R. 1b) In response to this attack, Bay County Animal Control Officer David Chasteen interviewed
5 Taylor and took pictures of his bite wounds. Officer Chasteen testified in the dangerous dog hearing before the Special Magistrate that Taylor told him that he was playing hide and seek at his house on September 26, 2015 when Marley attacked and bit him multiple times. (R. 3 at 5:45). At the hearing, Taylor also testified that he was playing hide and seek and cops and robbers with Trenton and Sophia inside the house when Marley got protective and attacked and bit him. (R. 3 at 49:28 50:02). Officer Chasteen testified that he examined and took pictures of Taylor s wounds and he had multiple bite marks at various places on his body. (R. 3 at 6:40 7:05) The pictures of the bite marks were entered into evidence at the hearing. (R.1e). Mr. Jones neighbor, Lindsay Dillman, also testified that she provided medical assistance to Taylor after the dog attack on September 26 th and that he had multiple puncture wounds on his body and as many as 10 bites. (R. 3 at 17:28 17:50) Ms. Dillman also gave Bay County Animal Control a sworn statement (R.1g). After this dog bite incident, Bay County Animal Control placed Marley on a 10-day home quarantine. (R.1b) On October 6, 2015, the day that Marley was scheduled to complete his mandatory 10-day quarantine from the bite incident on September 26, 2015, Bay County Animal Control received another call alleging that Marley again bit 15 year old Taylor Freeman. In a letter written by Taylor, and entered into evidence by
6 Jonathan Jones at the hearing, Taylor wrote, The second time he attacked me was because I came home one day after school took him for a walk and I took his leash off and then he started attacking me. All he did was cut me in different places. (R.2 b). Bay County Animal Control investigated the incident, interviewed Taylor and took pictures of the new bite marks, and impounded Marley for a dangerous dog determination. (R 1c) On October 7, 2015, Bay County Animal Control determined that Marley met the definition of a dangerous dog and notified Marley s owner, Johnothan Jones, of the determination on October 12, 2015 (R. 1h). On October 19, 2015, Johnathan Jones delivered a letter to Bay County Animal Control appealing the dangerous dog determination. (R.1i). A Dangerous Dog Appeal Hearing was scheduled for November 13, 2015, and the hearing letter was hand-delivered to Mr. Jones on November 5, (R. 1i) Upon further review, Bay County determined that Marley caused a severe injury to Taylor Freeman, as defined by Bay County Code 4-402(c) and Fla. Stat (3), because the dog bit Taylor multiple times on September 26, On November 5, 2015, the undersigned, Assistant County Attorney, Jennifer Shuler, notified Mr. Jones that, based on the evidence that Marley caused Taylor a severe injury, Bay County Animal Control has a legal duty in accordance with Bay County Code and Fla. Stat (2) to euthanize Marley. Bay County
7 served a notice on Mr. Jones informing him that it would ask the Special Magistrate to uphold Bay County s decision to euthanize Marley at the Dangerous Dog Appeal Hearing on November 13, (R.1k). The Special Magistrate, Jonathan Dingus, heard Mr. Jones appeal in a quasi-judicial hearing that was held on November 13, Assistant County Attorney, Jennifer Shuler, presented the case on behalf of Bay County Animal Control. The Respondent, Johnothan Jones was present, but was not represented by counsel. The Magistrate took testimony from Officer David Chasteen, Officer Donald Halley, Lindsay Dillman, Patricia Freeman, Taylor Freeman, and Jonathan Jones. A tape recording of the hearing has been filed with this Court. (R. 3) The Special Magistrate found that Marley meets the definition of a dangerous dog, pursuant to Florida Statute (1)(a) and Bay County Code Sec (a)(1) because he aggressively bit, attacked and endangered 15 year old Taylor Freeman on September 26, 2015 and October 6, Additionally, the Special Magistrate found that Marley caused Taylor Freeman a severe injury, on September 26, 2015, as defined by Florida Statute (3) and Bay County Code Sec (c), because he inflicted multiple bites on Taylor. The Special Magistrate did not uphold Bay County decision to euthanize Marley because the Special Magistrate does not agree that Florida Statute (2) and Bay County Code Sec mandates that Marley be euthanized for inflicting a severe
8 injury on Taylor Freeman (R.4). Bay County is appealing the portion of the Special Magistrate s order that declines to uphold Bay County s decision to euthanize Marley. STANDARD OF REVIEW When reviewing an administrative order, the court must determine whether procedural due process is afforded, whether the essential requirements of the law have been observed, and whether the administrative findings and judgment are supported by competent, substantial evidence. City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624, 626 (Fla. 1982). The Florida Supreme Court has defined competent, substantial evidence as evidence that is sufficiently relevant and material that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached. DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912, 916 (Fla. 1957). ARGUMENT Bay County contends that the Special Magistrate failed to observe the essential requirements of law when he declined to uphold Bay County s decision to euthanize Marley for causing a severe injury to Taylor Freeman on September 26, According to Florida Statute (2): If a dog that has not been declared dangerous attacks and causes severe injury to or death of any human (emphasis added), the dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine, if necessary, for the proper length of time or held for 10 business days after the owner is given written notification under Fla. Stat , and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner.
9 In essence, this Florida Statute mirrors language in Bay County Code Section Likewise both Bay County Code Section 4-402(c) and Florida Statute (3) defines a severe injury as, any physical injury that results in broken bones, multiple bites, or disfiguring lacerations requiring sutures or reconstructive surgery. More than one person testified at the November 13, 2015 hearing before the Special Magistrate that Marley inflicted multiple bites on Taylor Freeman when he attacked him on September 26, In addition, pictures of the bites were entered into evidence. While the actual number of bites varied according to different witness testimony, the Special Magistrate received competent, substantial evidence that Marley inflicted anywhere from 5-10 bites on Taylor during that dog attack. Despite finding that Marley caused Taylor a severe injury, the Magistrate concluded that Bay County Code and Florida Statute (2) does not require that a dog who causes a severe injury be euthanized. However, the statute is unequivocal. It states that if a dog attacks and causes a severe injury it shall be confiscated and, after the 10 day appeal period has passed, thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. Florida Statute Chapter 767 sets out a uniform system for classifying dogs as dangerous, imposes restrictions and requirements on dogs that are classified as dangerous, and it also addresses the consequences of dog attacks. Florida
10 Statute also allows local governments to place further restrictions or requirements on owners of dangerous dogs and to develop procedures to implement the act. Certain provisions of Chapter 767 provide dogs and dog owners with the defense of provocation when a dog either faces the classification of dangerous or the consequence of a dog attack. For example, both Florida Statute and Bay County Code Sec define a dangerous dog as follows: Definitions. As used in this act, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) Dangerous dog means any dog that according to the records of the appropriately authority: (1) Has aggressively bitten, attacked, or endangered a human or has inflicted severe injury on a human being on public or private property; (2) Has more than once severely injured or killed a domestic animal while off the owner s property; or (3) Has, when unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks or any public or private property other than the owner's property in a menacing fashion or in an apparent attitude of attack, provided that such actions are attested to in a sworn statement by one or more persons dutifully investigated by the appropriate authority. (b) Unprovoked means that the victim who has been conducting himself peacefully and lawfully has been bitten or chased in a menacing fashion or attacked by a dog. Provocation is also a defense to a dog attack or bite as described in Florida Statute (1) and Bay County Code Section 4-409:
11 If a dog that has previously been declared dangerous attacks or bites a person or a domestic animal without provocation, the owner is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree In addition, the dangerous dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine, if necessary, for the proper length of time, or impounded and held for 10 business days after the owner is given written notification under s , and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. This 10 day period shall allow the owner to request a hearing under s In contrast, in Florida Statute (2), the statute at issue, the Florida Legislature leaves out the defense of provocation if a dog causes severe injury to or death of any human. In those cases of severe injury or death, the animal control authority shall confiscate the dog, allow for an appeal period, and the dog shall be thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. The canon of statutory construction in pari materia provides that statutes on the same subject matter should be read together to ascertain the Legislative intent. Florida State Racing Com. v. McLaughlin, 102 So.2d 574, (Fla. 1958). It is clear from an overall review of Florida Statutes Chapter 767, that the Legislature decided to provide for the defense of provocation in certain circumstances but not in others i.e. when a dog attack causes severe injury or death to a human. In such instances, it was reasonable for the Legislature to decide that euthanizing a dog that causes this level of injury or death is the safest course of action to protect the public. Bay County does not agree that Marley was provoked when the dog attacked and severely injured Taylor Freeman on September 26, It should be
12 safe for children to play in their home, even if the play is rough and tumble. Certainly, Marley was not provoked when he attacked and bit Taylor Freeman on October 6, However, assuming the Court does believe that Marley was provoked and acted to protect one or more of the siblings during the game of hide and seek on September 26, 2015, the statute at issue does not allow for the defense of provocation when a dog attack causes a severe injury or death. It is Bay County s position that euthanizing Marley is not just mandated by statute; it is the best disposition for a dog that has twice attacked a child in its own home. The problem with merely classifying Marley as dangerous and imposing restrictions is that this dog will be returned to live in a house with three children and mere restrictions cannot guarantee that another attack will not occur. CONCLUSION Bay County respectfully requests this Court find that Special Magistrate Johnathan Dingus failed to comply with the essential requirements of the law when he declined to uphold Bay County s decision to euthanize Marley for causing a severe injury to Taylor Freeman on September 26, 2015 in accordance with Florida Statute (2). We ask that the Court reverse this decision of the Special Magistrate and direct that Marley be destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner.
13 Respectfully submitted this 29 th day of December, /s/ Jennifer W. Shuler, Esq. Bay County Assistant County Attorney Fla. Bar No W 11th Street Panama City FL Tele: (850) Fax: (850) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Appellant s Brief has been sent via to: Jason Johnson, Esq., jjohnson@jgd-law.com and pleadings@jgd-law.com, Attorney for Appellee, on this 29 th of December /s/ Jennifer W. Shuler CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that this brief complies with the font requirements (Times New Roman, 14pt) of Rule 9.100(1), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. /s/ Jennifer W. Shuler
CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG
CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE Sections: 6.10.010 Title 6.10.020 Applicability 6.10.030 Definitions 6.10.040 Defense 6.10.050 Declaration of
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS WITNESS STATEMENT
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS WITNESS STATEMENT 1. Include the Animal Care and Control case number on the upper right hand corner. 2. Please be as accurate and detailed as possible in outlining the
More informationCHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS
CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS SECTIONS: 2.20.010 DEFINITIONS 2.20.020 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS--DOGS WITHOUT PERMIT PROHIBITED 2.20.030 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS--DECLARATION
More informationArticle VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs
Sec. 7-53. Purpose. Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs Within the county of Santa Barbara there are potentially dangerous and vicious dogs that have become a serious and widespread
More informationTitle 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and
Title 6 Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC 8.10.040, 8.10.050, and 8.10.180. 6-1 Lyons Municipal Code 6.05.020 Chapter 6.05 Dangerous Dogs Sections:
More informationSUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.
SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WASHOE COUNTY CODE BY CLARIFYING THE MEANING OF
More informationORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 07-3 RESOLUTION NO. 070620-4 APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS AND THE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
More information(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:
505.16 VICIOUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS (a) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this section: (1) "Director of Public Safety" means the City official
More informationCounty Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-44 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO DETERMINE ANIMALS ARE DANGEROUS; REGULATING DANGEROUS AND RABID DOGS; AUTHORIZING EUTHANIZATION
More informationVolusia County Animal Services Currently Declared Dangerous Dogs
Dangerous Dogs Declared Dangerous Dog List The dogs listed on this site have been declared dangerous by Volusia County Animal Services. The owners of these dogs are required to register their dog pursuant
More informationSUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.
SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WASHOE COUNTY CODE BY CLARIFYING THE MEANING OF
More informationCity of Grand Island
City of Grand Island Tuesday, September 07, 2004 Study Session Item -2 Discussion Concerning Revisions to Dog Ordinances Staff Contact: Doug Walker City of Grand Island City Council Council Agenda Memo
More informationVolusia County Animal Services Currently Declared Dangerous Dogs
Dangerous Dogs Declared Dangerous Dog List Volusia County Animal Services Currently Declared Dangerous Dogs The dogs listed on this site have been declared dangerous by Volusia County Animal Services.
More informationChapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008
Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008 506.01 KEEPING DANGEROUS OR VICIOUS ANIMALS. No person shall keep, harbor or own any dangerous or vicious animal within the City of Lakewood,
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 191591-3 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 SB232 2 3 4 ENROLLED, An Act, 5 Relating to dogs; to create Emily's
More informationORDINANCE NO. 14,951
ORDINANCE NO. 14,951 AN ORDINANCE to amend the Municipal Code of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, 2000, adopted by Ordinance No. 13,827, passed June 5, 2000, and amended by Ordinance No. 13,854 passed August
More informationORDINANCE NO DANGEROUS ANIMALS, ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITED ANIMALS
ORDINANCE NO. 09-002 DANGEROUS ANIMALS, ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITED ANIMALS WHEREAS, the statutes of the State of Minnesota grant authority to the County Boards of the State to adopt ordinances
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
ORDINANCE NO. 5769 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, current ordinances concerning the classification and disposition of dangerous
More informationPage 47-1 rev
47.01 47.11(1) CHAPTER 47 ANIMAL CONTROL 47.01 Title. 47.02 Purpose. 47.03 Authority. 47.04 Administration. 47.05 Application. 47.06 Definitions. [47.07-47.10 reserved.] 47.11 Rabies Vaccinations Required.
More information93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.
93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS. (A) Attack by an animal. It shall be unlawful for any person's animal to inflict or attempt to inflict bodily injury to any person or other animal whether or not the owner is present.
More informationTMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:
CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS Dangerous Dogs 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons Checklist 17-1 Script/Notes Definitions: Animal control authority is a municipal or county animal control office with authority over
More information508.02 DEFINITIONS. When used in this article, the following words, terms, and phrases, and their derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates
More informationCITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )
CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. #647-05-18-89) 13.01 DOGS - (Ord. #647-5-18-89) (1) Statutes Adopted. The current and future provisions of Ch. 174, Wis. Stats., defining
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION The Fairways at Emerald Greens Condominium
More informationFIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-1481 DEBORAH DAVISON, Appellant, v. REBECCA BERG, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Steven M. Fahlgren, Judge. March
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION RIVCO AT RINGLING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More information8 WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Hernando County is authorized,
1 ORDINANCE NO.: 2012-2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE HERNANDO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 3 COMMISSIONERS AMENDING HERNANDO COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 4 6 ANIMAL CONTROL; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING 5 FOR INCLUSION
More informationAttachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan
Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan City or Vicious/Aggressive /provisi ous to Toronto Notice of caution $240 ( off leash in park is $360 under Chapter 608, Parks. Barrie of aggressive : - means a which,
More informationANIMALS. Gilmer County Code Chapter 14. Article I. In General Secs Reserved.
Gilmer County Code Chapter 14 ANIMALS Editor's note: Res. No. 06-176, Exh. A, adopted Oct. 12, 2006, amended the former Ch. 14, 14-1, 14-2, and enacted a new Ch. 14 as set out herein. The former Ch. 14
More informationRESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:
PROPOSED VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE: RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance: A. Definitions: Animal Control
More informationCITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 1, 2, AND 8 OF THE CITY CODE TO IMPLEMENT NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING DOGS WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY OF STERLING
More informationDANGEROUS DOGS AND WILD ANIMALS
58.01 Authorization 58.10 Pit Bull Dogs Presumed Dangerous 58.02 Purpose and Intent 58.11 Notification of Intent to Impound 58.03 Definitions 58.12 Immediate Impoundment 58.04 Procedure for Declaring a
More informationCITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 1, 2, AND 8 OF THE CITY CODE TO IMPLEMENT NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING DOGS WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY OF STERLING
More informationTown of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151
Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151 ANIMAL ORDINANCE Ordinance # Whereby, the Town of Niagara, Marinette County, does hereby adopt Ordinance #, Animal Ordinance, for the purpose of regulating certain
More informationANIMALS ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
ANIMALS ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 6-1. Appointment of an Animal Control Officer. The City Manager shall appoint an Animal Control Officer as authorized n Section 31 of the Charter. Sec. 6-2. Enforcement
More informationSt. Paul City Ordinance
St. Paul City Ordinance Title XX. Chapter 200. Section. 200.11. Potentially dangerous animals. (a) Potentially dangerous animals. A potentially dangerous animal is an animal which has: (1) When unprovoked,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION CAMELOT TWO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 190459-2 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 190459-2:n:01/25/2018:KBH/tgw LSA2018-479R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS:
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS
ORDINANCE NO. 1365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS TITLE V SANITATION & HEALTH CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS ARTICLE 1 DOGS
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Royal Stewart Arms Condominium No. 5, Inc.,
More informationTOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014
TOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY This ordinance is adopted by the
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SUNSET GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationGALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE
GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1. Purpose and Legislative Findings. Uncontrolled dogs present a danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Gallatin County. The Gallatin
More informationSeptember 25, Glynn County Board of Commissioners. Matt Doering, Chief of Police
Glynn County Police Department 157 Public Safety Boulevard Dispatch (912) 554-3645 Brunswick, Georgia 31525 Administration (912) 554-7800 www.police.glynncounty-ga.org Fax (912) 554-7885 September 25,
More informationDangerous Dogs and Texas Law
Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law ANDREW W. HAGEN JUDGE, MUNICIPAL COURT OF UVALDE 2015-2016 Texas Animal Statutes Health and Safety Code, Title 10, Health and Safety of Animals Sections 821 through 829 Chapter
More informationCORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2012-103 Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs WHEREAS The Municipal Act, R.S.O., 2001 section 103 authorizes the Council of a municipality
More informationLoretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )
Loretto City Code 600:00 CHAPTER VI ANIMALS (Repealed, Ord. 2010-03) Added, Ord. 2010-03) Section 600. PURPOSE. It is the intent of this chapter to establish regulations which will allow the keeping of
More informationCHAPTER XII ANIMALS. .2 ANIMAL. Animal means every living creature, other than man, which may be affected by rabies.
CHAPTER XII ANIMALS 1.0 PURPOSE. The purpose of this chapter is to promote a harmonious relationship between man and animal through established conduct and procedures when man and animals interact so as
More information2.1 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE CITY OF HERNANDO, MISSISSIPPI
HERNANDO 1 2.1 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE CITY OF HERNANDO, MISSISSIPPI WHEREAS, present conditions exist which make it mandatory
More informationTITLE 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS
6.04.010 6.04.020 TITLE 6 ANIMALS Chapters: 6.04 Dogs 6.08 Animals Generally Chapter 6.04 DOGS Sections: 6.04.010 Purpose. 6.04.020 Animals running at large. 6.04.030 Nuisances. 6.04.040 Dangerous animals.
More informationASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 6, 2007
ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER, 00 Sponsored by: Assemblyman NEIL M. COHEN District 0 (Union) Assemblyman PATRICK J. DIEGNAN, JR. District (Middlesex) SYNOPSIS Revises
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS AND CATS. 3. DANGEROUS ANIMALS. TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business
More informationMINUTES Animal Control Hearing
MINUTES Animal Control Hearing Thursday, February 2, 2017 The Intracoastal Room at Palm Coast City Hall Community Wing Entrance 160 Lake Avenue, Palm Coast, Florida 32164 A. Call to Order and Pledge of
More informationD. August 1, 2017 Minutes 11:30am approval was deferred due to missing testimony and reference to the closing arguments.
MINUTES Animal Control Special Hearing Friday, August 18, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. The Intracoastal Room at Palm Coast City Hall Community Wing Entrance 160 Lake Avenue, Palm Coast, Florida 32164 A. Call to
More informationCITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW
CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF MEADOW LAKE TO REGISTER, LICENSE, REGULATE, RESTRAIN AND IMPOUND DOGS CITED AS THE DOG BYLAW. The Council of the City of Meadow Lake,
More informationPLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.
c t DOG ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 23, 2017. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-2 WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect and to promote the general health and welfare of its citizens and is
More informationChief Administrative Officer or CAO means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village or their designate.
VILLAGE OF VETERAN BYLAW NO. 511-13 DOG BYLAW BEING A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF VETERAN IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE LICENSING, REGULATION AND CONTROL OF DOGS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF VETERAN. WHEREAS,
More informationCHAPTER 14 RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL
CHAPTER 14 RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL ARTICLE A Section 14-1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Definitions The following words, terms, and phrases when used in this Chapter shall have the meaning ascribed to them
More informationRep. Sherry Appleton Testimony Transcribed. Washington State House Judiciary Committee
Rep. Sherry Appleton Testimony Transcribed Washington State House Judiciary Committee House Bill - 01 Regular Session February, 01 Transcribed and annotated by Colleen Lynn, the president and founder of
More informationA1 Control of dangerous and menacing dogs (reviewed 04/01/15)
A1 Control of dangerous and menacing dogs (reviewed 04/01/15) 1 Introduction 1.1 For as long as human beings continue to interact with dogs, there will be incidents of dog bites. However, the frequency
More informationChapter 6 ANIMALS* Article I. In General
Chapter 6 ANIMALS* Article I. In General Sec. 6-1. Roaming dogs; trespass complaints. Sees. 6-2-6-10. Reserved. Sec. 6-11. Sec. 6-12. Sec. 6-13. Sec. 6-14. Sec. 6-15. Sec. 6-16. Sec. 6-17. Sec. 6-18. Sec.
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS) The City Council of the City of Rice, Minnesota, hereby ordains that Section 405 (Dogs and Cats) of Chapter IV (Public Safety)
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SOUTH BAY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationBY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TITLE 5 ANIMAL REGULATIONS ADOPTED AND APPROVED ON DECEMBER 4, 2018 BY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2019 Chapter 1 Authority CHAPTER 1 AUTHORITY 5-1-1 AUTHORITY
More informationYEAR 2005 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE. Brevard County Code Chapter 14. Adopted July 26, 2005
YEAR 2005 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE Brevard County Code Chapter 14 Adopted July 26, 2005 ANIMAL SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT 1515 SARNO ROAD, BLDG A MELBOURNE, FL 32935 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANIMAL SERVICES
More information(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.
3-1-1 3-1-1 DEFINITIONS. In this title: (1) ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY means an animal control office owned, operated, leased or contracted by the city with authority over the area in which the dog is kept.
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF ANTIGONISH. By-law Being a By-Law Respecting the Responsible Ownership of Dogs
WHEREAS Section 172(1) of the Nova Scotia Municipal Government Act (MGA) provides Municipalities with the power to make by-laws, for Municipal purposes, respecting the health, well-being, safety and protection
More informationTOWN OF CABOT, VERMONT ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS & WOLF-HYBRIDS
SECTION 1: AUTHORITY TOWN OF CABOT, VERMONT ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS & WOLF-HYBRIDS This ordinance is adopted by the Selectboard of the Town of Cabot under authority of 20 V.S.A. 3549, 24 V.S.A.
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. 3. VICIOUS DOGS. CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business restricted.
More informationDep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017)
Dep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017) Evidence established that two dogs, Jacob and Panda, are dangerous under the New York City Health Code because they
More informationSUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 691 A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area WHEREAS the Sunshine Coast Regional District has established a service
More informationWOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.
WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007 Section I. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates. A. Dog shall mean both male and female dog.
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2013-15 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF DANGEROUS ANIMALS INCLUDING PIT BULL DOGS AND PROVIDING FOR REGISTRATION FOR CERTAIN DANGEROUS ANIMALS, AND PROVIDING
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Lakeside Condominium Association No. 3,
More informationBISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO. 2009-02 ADOPTED June 24, 2009 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Paiute Tribal Ordinance No. 2009-02 Regulating the Vaccination
More informationChapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS
Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS 8.02.010 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, certain terms used herein shall be interpreted, implied, or defined as follows: 1) "Animal control officer" means all
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-588
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2009 MARIE TATMAN AND CHARLES TATMAN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-588 SPACE COAST KENNEL CLUB, INC., ET AL., Appellee. /
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION RIVIERA CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC.,
More informationCHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.
CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL 5-1. Definitions Animal impoundment officer: The person or persons employed or contracted by the Town as its enforcement officer or officers, or the person of persons
More informationLAW AND ORDER CODE Title 16 Animal Control
FALLON PAIUTE-SHOSHONE TRIBE LAW AND ORDER CODE Title 16 Animal Control 1 Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Law & Order Codes LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 16 ANIMAL CONTROL Table of Contents TITLE 16 ANIMAL CONTROL
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY BY-LAW NO. 2005-121 Being a by-law to licence dogs and to prohibit the running of dogs at large and to cany out the operation of an animal shelter and pound.
More informationCHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL
CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL SECTION: 5-4-1: Definitions 5-4-2: License Required (Repealed) 5-4-3: License Fees (Repealed) 5-4-4: Unidentified Dogs Running at Large 5-4-5: Record of License (Repealed) 5-4-6:
More informationORDINANCE NO. 1534(06)
ORDINANCE NO. 1534(06) An Ordinance of the City of Lompoc, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, Amending Chapter 6 Animals, Requiring Sterilization Of Dogs in the City WHEREAS, irresponsible breeding
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 10, 2014 california legislature 2013 14 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343 Introduced by Assembly Member Gatto February 21, 2014 An act to amend Section 31108 of the Food
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
0- TITLE 0 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. CHAPTER IN GENERAL SECTION 0-0. Running at large prohibited. 0-02. Keeping near a residence or business restricted. 0-03. Pen or enclosure to be
More informationArgued May 9, 2017 Decided September 5, Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationTITLE IX: GENERAL REGULATIONS. Chapter 91. Animal Control Ordinance
TITLE IX: GENERAL REGULATIONS Chapter 91 Animal Control Ordinance CHAPTER 91: ANIMAL CONTROL Section 91.01 Title 91.02 Statement of Purpose 91.03 Applicability 91.04 Definitions 91.05 Duties and Powers
More informationS 0347 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC0001 01 -- S 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO ANIMAL AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY -- REGULATION OF VICIOUS DOGS Introduced By: Senators
More informationPolk County Animal Control and Animal Services Ordinance
~-.. S.Oer/ff Cr11t/r Judd:--:: - --------- /tj/j.'cbliljj)'~~.------- -; Polk County Animal Control and Animal Services Ordinance As amended by 13-035 Polk County Sheriff's Office Animal Control Section
More information2008 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE September 5th, 2008 / Draft #3
2008 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE September 5th, 2008 / Draft #3 Sec. 1-1. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section,
More informationCITY OF SARASOTA Sarasota, Florida. Pamela M. Nadalini, MBA, CMC, City Auditor & Clerk. Ordinance No (Dogs must be leashed in all City parks)
RECEIVED CITY OF SARASOTA Sarasota, Florida JUL 21 2017 City Auditor & Clerk Inter-Office Memorandum July 20, 2017 TO: FROM: RE: Pamela M. Nadalini, MBA, CMC, City Auditor & Clerk John K. Shamsey, Assistant
More informationThe Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth
The Corporation of the By-law 2002-045 (Consolidated as amended) DANGEROUS DOGS BY-LAW A by-law to provide for the muzzling of dogs declared dangerous in the. Consolidation Amendment No. 1 By-law No. 2005-075
More informationBY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW
BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW Title 1. This By-Law shall be known and may be cited as the Dog Control By-Law and is enacted to provide for the orderly control of dogs in the County of Inverness. 2. This
More informationFRANKLIN COUNTY ORDINANCE 2017-!}} This article shall be known as the "Animal Control Ordinance of Franklin County,
FRANKLIN COUNTY ORDINANCE 2017-!}} AN ORDINANCE REGULATING ANIMALS IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, FLORIDA AND REPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES OF FRANKLIN COUNTY REGULATING ANIMALS, PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES,
More informationThis article shall be referred to as "Angel's Law" and may sometimes be referred to herein as "this ordinance."
ARTICLE 17: ANGEL'S LAW Section 9-17-1 Findings and intent 9-17-2 Short title 9-17-3 Definitions 9-17-4 Potentially dangerous dog 9-17-5 Dangerous dog 9-17-6 Irresponsible owners 9-17-7 Hearings 9-17-99
More informationORDINANCE #1 TOWN OF WOLF RIVER DOG ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS
ORDINANCE #1 TOWN OF WOLF RIVER DOG ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Sec. 10-1. Title/purpose... 1 sec. 10-2. Authority... 1 sec. 10-3. Adoption of ordinance... 1 sec. 10-4. Statutes adopted... 1 sec. 10-5.
More informationFOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE CHAPTER 1-10 {00470605.DOCX}Page 1 of 13 FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Table of Contents 1.... General 2....Definitions 3.... Administration
More information*State law reference(s)--rabies control, V.T.C.A., Health and Safety Code et seq.
ARTICLE IV. RABIES CONTROL* *State law reference(s)--rabies control, V.T.C.A., Health and Safety Code 826.001 et seq. Sec. 3-126. Proof of current vaccination required. The owner of each dog, cat, or ferret
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 30, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D16-314 & 3D15-2609 Lower Tribunal No. 13-18732
More information