EX TEMPORE DECISION SEVERITY APPEAL. DECISION 1. Appeal dismissed 2. Penalty of 12 months disqualification imposed 3. Appeal deposit forfeited
|
|
- Darrell Clarke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL NEW SOUTH WALES TRIBUNAL: MR D. B. ARMATI EX TEMPORE DECISION APPEAL OF MR NATHAN GOODWIN BREACH OF RULE 95(8) OF THE GREYHOUND RACING RULES SEVERITY APPEAL DECISION 1. Appeal dismissed 2. Penalty of 12 months disqualification imposed 3. Appeal deposit forfeited Wednesday 11 October The Appellant, licensed trainer Mr Nathan Goodwin, appeals against a decision of the stewards of Greyhound Racing NSW of 16 August 2017 to 1
2 impose upon him a period of disqualification of twelve months for a breach of rule 95(8)(a). 2. In their letter of 16 June 2017 the stewards set out the nature of the charge and the parts of rule 95 upon which they relied in the following terms: R95(8) The Controlling Body may impose on a person any 1 or more of the penalties referred to in sub-rule (1) if (a) the person has been convicted of an offence by any court and the Controlling Body is satisfied that (i) the nature of the offence is such that the person's continued participation or association with greyhound racing would be detrimental to the proper control and regulation of greyhound racing; or (ii) the continued enjoyment of the rights and privileges conferred by the person would be prejudicial or contrary to the interests of the Controlling Body. That letter of 16 June 2017 continued: I have been advised by the RSPCA that on 29 May 2017 in Kempsey Local Court you were convicted of an offence under section 5(3) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 and fined a sum of $1,200 for a failure to provide veterinary treatment. That letter later continued: The nature of the offence committed by you is failing to provide veterinary treatment when necessary. These actions were directly associated with the welfare of a greyhound in your care. I am of the view, as is GRNSW and the industry, that there is no place in greyhound racing for animal cruelty including failure to provide proper care and treatment. Such conduct is clearly detrimental and contrary to the interest, welfare, image, control and promotion of greyhound racing. 3. Having specified those particulars, it is noted that the actual failures were not documented. In any event, after due process and the making of submissions and the consideration of those submissions, the decision of 16 August 2017 was issued. 4. The Appellant admitted to the stewards that he had breached the rule. On lodging the appeal, the Appellant admitted that he breached the rule, and 2
3 this is a severity appeal only. The necessity, therefore, to canvas facts in greater detail falls away. 5. The breach of the rule having been admitted, it is not necessary to dissect it, or the given particulars, in great detail. In summary, the matters to establish the offence are there and contained in the particulars. 6. The facts are that the Appellant has been associated with greyhound racing all of his life. He is currently 39 years of age. He tells the Tribunal today that he commenced as a race caller at the age of 10, and that he called races until he was 16. He then became licensed as an attendant. He then obtained his drivers licence. At the age of 19 he was a bookmaker. He became a lure driver and a starter, and has continued his association with the industry as a licensed trainer for some years. He was in Queensland for a period of time. About four years ago he transferred to Kempsey, where he acquired a 100-acre property and carried out substantial renovations to that property, building a complex comprising 30 kennels and 15 rearing yards, together with a training track. At the time of his disqualification he had 30 greyhounds in training and 20 greyhounds in the rearing yards. 7. One of the greyhounds in his care was owned by a Queenslander. That dog, on 22 April 2016, was involved in a dog fight and suffered injuries. It is those injuries, and the treatment which was not provided, which have led to the prosecution in the Local Court and the actions of the stewards. 8. In evidence there are photographs. As is often the case, photographs of injuries are highly prejudicial. This case is no exception. The photographs show, consistent with the evidence, what, in the Tribunal's opinion, can only be assessed as substantially serious and troubling injuries to the greyhound. 9. To put the balance of the evidence in context, it is noted that for a period of time the Appellant treated the greyhound himself, until 9 May 2016, when it was taken to a veterinarian for treatment. The nature of the injuries as at the presentation to the veterinarian on 9 May 2016 were described as "wound over left shoulder, full thickness and 4 centimetres wide and 11 to 12 centimetres long". It then had a purulent exudate around the edges over muscle layers. Wound of the right-hand side chest wall about 1 centimetre and 2 centimetres. That was healing. Some puss was exuded. It also had a deep wound over its right shoulder 2 centimetres in diameter, with lots of purulent exudate from that wound. There were other multiple healing or healed wounds over the back of the right elbow and over its back. A summary of the diagnosis was: multiple open wounds from dog fight, some of which are infected. 10. A treatment plan was immediately embarked upon. That was for pain relief and the use of antibiotics, and it was necessary for the greyhound to receive a substantial range of treatments involving a period of surgery after 3
4 anaesthesia, injections of various types, namely, Tergive, ketamine, diazepam and Noroclav. Suturing took place, and treatment continued until 2 June. The dog was, according to the veterinary report (exhibit R4, of Deagon & Sandgate Veterinary Practice's Vetwell of Deagon in Queensland) treated on nine occasions prior to discharge. 11. The Appellant was interviewed by an RSPCA inspector on 10 August 2016 in the company of a GRNSW inspector. In the course of that interview, which extends for 76 pages, of which 54 are relevant to this matter, the Appellant voluntarily and co-operatively spoke to the inspectors. 12. There are a number of matters to be extracted from that interview. Firstly, the Appellant provided treatment to the greyhound which essentially, to summarise it without great accuracy, as it is a penalty matter only, involved him bringing the greyhound down from the kennels to be closer to the area where it was subsequently treated. It was first sprayed with kerosene, which the Appellant was of the opinion would dry out the wounds and stop infections, acknowledging that that was an old-school remedy. It was quite apparent to him that that led to an immediate skin reaction, and he ceased that treatment and commenced treatment with Debrisol. He then provided the greyhound with penicillin and Amoxicillin, which are antibiotics. He had those antibiotics at his establishment, having previously purchased them from veterinarians, as he could do. They were unlabelled at the time, as they could be. 13. It is apparent that the Appellant is not a trained veterinarian. The adequacy or otherwise of the treatment he gave has not been the subject of reports by veterinarians, but it is questionable as to whether or not that was either adequate or appropriate. Nevertheless, that treatment was given. 14. In addition, he tells the Tribunal today that he took the dog to the beach regularly to bathe it, to deal with both its movement and to aid in its healing. He says that he provided treatment to the dog on a more than daily basis. 15. The provision of that treatment must be seen in the light of his own perception of that which this dog suffered and that which he was doing. He was of the opinion that the wounds were superficial. He was of the opinion and he told the owner accordingly, having reported the injury to him that he could treat the dog at his kennels and over a period of time, a number of weeks, fix the dog up, to use the Tribunal's terms, or, as he said at transcript page 12, "I'll be able to fix him up." That would essentially be by way of healing, in conjunction with the treatment that he was providing. There was even discussion about a need for skin grafts, a matter which was raised by the owner and which the Appellant considered to be a somewhat pedantic approach. It is noted that the veterinarian subsequently attended to that. 4
5 16. Though driven by a continued belief that that which he was doing was adequate, he nevertheless conceded to the inspectors that it was the worst wound of a dog that he had seen although the inspectors were able to say they had seen a lot worse. 17. As to the aspects of pain, he did not have, nor was the dog administered, any pain relief. It is open issue as to whether or not he was of any opinion that the dog was in pain. He said he did not know how to detect pain, but was not of the opinion that the dog was in such pain, despite his lack of training, that he felt anything was needed for it. He conceded that the dog was suffering; and later, having made that concession, he was asked this question: It's in some sort of pain? He answered: Yeah. And later: He was definitely suffering. 18. Having undertaken that record of interview, he was prosecuted at Kempsey Local Court and, on a plea of guilty, convicted and fined $1,200 on 29 May The facts sheet supporting the plea is in evidence. 19. The Appellant was not known to the RSPCA and, it is apparent on the facts that are here, is not known for anything similar with GRNSW. 20. A veterinary report of a Dr Morgan at Sandgate Veterinary Hospital was before the Local Court. To summarise, the key facts are: the failure to provide necessary treatment; full thickness wounds; severe infection; pain and discomfort; 30 days of treatment to clear; two surgeries for the wounds to be sutured and fully healed; and, critically, this: If the dog had been treated immediately, the likelihood of the wounds healing after the first surgery would have been far greater; also, the infection would have been most likely avoided with antibiotic treatment. If treatment was administered immediately after the fight, this would have saved it from the extended pain and suffering it had to endure. 21. There is, of course, some issue about the accuracy of Dr Morgan's report in respect of antibiotic treatment. Nevertheless, it is apparent from the admission documents of Deagon & Sandgate, earlier referred to, that the treatment had not been sufficient. 5
6 22. Subsequently, the inspectors reported to the stewards, who conducted their inquiry by paper and came to the decision that they did. 23. In his submissions to the stewards which are essentially repeated today and need not be referred to further, other than the consistency of the approach adopted by the Appellant (to which the Tribunal will return) he was supported by two referees. 24. The first is Robyn Hudson of 25 June 2017: known him for 39 years; aware of the conviction; that the Appellant is the trainer of dogs of hers for more than 30 years; every confidence in him and in his manner of training and caring for the dogs, even if they are injured; he always has medical supplies on hand; he is an honest, respectful, reliable and hardworking man, with an ability to relate with people and dogs. 25. The second is Daniel Abela of 25 June 2017: known him for four years; aware of the charges; seen him attentively care for many dogs in his care; and considers it out of character that he would not administer the correct amount of care required. He refers to several dogs of his in the care of the Appellant, that he is a frequent visitor to his property; observed him meeting all regulatory standards and keeping all necessary medical records and supplies; and he is a hard worker. 26. Importantly, in relation to subjective facts, in addition to those to which reference has been made, there is the fact that the Appellant expresses remorse and devastation for his failures. He does so in the context that greyhounds have been his life, and he is concerned that the reputation which he established has been destroyed. The Tribunal will return to that. 27. He says, importantly, that he has learnt from his failure on this occasion, and that this type of thing will not occur again. He refers to the hardship to which he has been subjected by reason of the disqualification. The Tribunal has referred to those matters. His correspondence refers to his financial difficulties, which are not unsurprising in respect of the removal of his income and difficulty that will necessarily follow for all types of financial commitments that members of the community have. He also refers to the hardship to which he has been subjected by his necessary removal from the subject property because Mr Abela, the referee, continues to rear greyhounds at the Appellant's training establishment. He therefore has difficulty in visiting relatives who live on the property, with their various disabilities, which need not be set out. 28. Importantly, the Appellant has emphasised in his submissions that he did care for the greyhound; that he did so in the belief that what he was doing was appropriate; but now he has a greater understanding of the need for the taking of a greyhound to a veterinarian where there is an injury. Lastly, he says he is a good person with the right intentions for the industry, and repeats his remorse. 6
7 29. The decision requires a standard approach. The first is to determine the objective seriousness of the breach, and then to determine whether there should be any reduction by reason of subjective circumstances. In certain cases, subjective facts cannot outweigh the need for an appropriate penalty because of the gravity of the objective facts of the case. 30. In this matter it is to be noted that the function which the Tribunal is invited to embark upon on behalf of the Respondent is to find that the penalty of twelve months disqualification that the stewards found appropriate should be maintained. It is said that they looked at the objective facts and then made an allowance for the subjectives to determine a period of twelve months. The Appellant, in his written submissions, has sought that he be suspended, not disqualified. 31. The facts of this matter raise issues which, in the Tribunal's opinion, are of considerable seriousness. The wounds which this greyhound suffered were severe. They were not fatal. The greyhound was saved. It apparently has returned to some degree of normality. As the Tribunal said earlier, the photographs do not depict a very kind picture of the Appellant's assessment of the injuries. Not only was the greyhound injured substantially; it was undoubtedly in pain and would have been extremely unwell from the infections which were raging through its body as a result of the inappropriate treatment to which it was subjected. 32. The Tribunal assesses the breach as objectively very serious. 33. So far as the subjectives are concerned, there has been an admission of the breach of the rule from the outset, reinforced in this case by the plea of guilty in the Local Court. That has, in the last number of years, attracted a discount of 25 per cent, and that is appropriate here. 34. The Appellant has been associated with the industry, and he is entitled to be recognised for the work he has done in the industry. That is a strong subjective factor. He has devoted himself to the industry and set up a not insubstantial establishment. The Tribunal accepts financial hardship will be occasioned by his inability to earn an income from it. Importantly, he has learnt his lesson. The need, therefore, for a message to be given to him for what is described in other places as specific deterrence, is much diminished. 35. However, to return to the objective seriousness, there is need for a clear message to be given to the community at large, whether they be other licensed trainers or those associated with the industry, such as owners, and for a clear set of guidelines to be given to regulatory officers, whether they be stewards or inspectors and the like, that this type of conduct cannot be accepted. The stewards, in their decision, quite clearly reflected upon the issues of the integrity of the industry and maintenance of the highest 7
8 standards of welfare and protection of the greyhounds that are involved with it. 36. The slight difference in this case and it might be assessed as a subjective matter, but it also has an impact upon the objective seriousness is the fact that the Appellant did not ignore the greyhound's injuries. He embarked upon a course of treatment which has now been found to be, and he accepts as, misguided at least in a genuine belief that what he was doing was appropriate. It is not, therefore, a case of the gravest neglect. 37. What then of parity? 38. Four specific cases have been put to the Tribunal, and within those two others are referred to. 39. The first in time is the decision of Justice Kavanagh of 6 June 2011 in Cheney. That case involved multiple charges, including, relevantly, failure to ensure that a greyhound did not suffer heat stress when produced at a racing event. The greyhound subsequently died. Justice Kavanagh reflected upon the need for a clear message, even for a person of 30 years training, with an unblemished record and no other cases of neglect in respect of greyhounds, with strong character evidence all matters which exist here. A nine-month disqualification was imposed. 40. The next is the case of Silver, a decision of stewards of 25 July As a result of kennel inspections, a number of charges were laid. The one that is relevant is failure to obtain veterinary care charge 4 as it was before the stewards to prevent pain and suffering being occasioned to a greyhound, in circumstances where a greyhound was very lame and in marked pain and discomfort. In that matter, essentially that there was a failure to obtain immediate veterinary care, and a nine-month disqualification was imposed, from a starting point of twelve months and reduced by 25 per cent for a guilty plea. 41. The next matter is that of Baskett, a decision of stewards of 21 September This was another lameness case, with a plea of not guilty entered before stewards. Some treatment was provided, there was consultation with a naturopath and plans to then seek veterinary attention, by a person who always cared for his greyhounds. That lameness required urgent veterinary treatment. There were personal circumstances, and no prior precedents. In respect of the lameness matter, there was a six-month disqualification; for pain and suffering, nine months disqualification, to be served concurrently. 42. The last is Dupuche, a stewards' decision of 16 June It involved lameness, aggravated cruelty and failure to provide veterinary treatment. There were deep concerns about the welfare of the animal, remorse, and 8
9 personal circumstances. No prior antecedents were raised the same as here. In that case, there was failure to provide treatment or veterinary care for more than two weeks after symptoms had been displaying for some eight seeks, with significant unnecessary pain and suffering. The greyhound subsequently died. A 15-year disqualification was imposed. There were aggravating factors which, it is accepted, do not exist here. 43. In the course of various of these decisions, the fifth and sixth precedents have been raised. 44. The first is Fisher, a Racing Appeals Tribunal decision, undated, rule 106: unnecessary pain and suffering, nine months suspension. A greyhound had been left unattended in a hot car for 15 minutes. 45. The other matter is Hogan, a Racing Appeals Tribunal decision, undated, again rule 106: not providing necessary veterinary attention for a broken hock, but some treatment given at home; a disqualification of ten months. 46. Those, then, are the parity cases. As has been said, some of them contain similar matters to those here. The key factors, however, in respect of objective seriousness, have been summarised. 47. In the Tribunal's opinion, a penalty greater than 16 months should have been the appropriate starting point to be considered. From that, there is to be a deduction of 25 per cent for the plea of guilty, and a deduction in respect of the personal circumstances that have been highlighted. 48. The other matter is that there is not a need for a personal message to be given to this Appellant to cause him to change his ways, but balancing that, as the Tribunal has said in summarising that greater period of 16 months, is the need, in particular, for a message to the community at large. 49. The Tribunal, therefore, if it was to consider the matter independently of the submissions made, would consider a penalty of disqualification of greater than 12 months at the end of the day would have been appropriate. In those circumstances, the submission by the Appellant that a suspension is appropriate simply cannot be accepted. 50. At the outset of the matter, the Tribunal was advised that the penalty of 12 months disqualification thought to be appropriate by the stewards should be that which the Tribunal considered appropriate. The submissions for the Appellant having been considered, the Tribunal sees no reason now to depart from that order. 51. In the circumstances, the severity appeal is dismissed. 9
10 52. The order of the Tribunal is that there be a period of disqualification of 12 months. There having been no stay, the date of commencement of that period appears to be the date of the stewards' decision, that is, 16 August There being no application for a refund of the deposit it is the order of the Tribunal that the appeal deposit be forfeited. 10
Guideline to Supplement to Codes of Practice Greyhound Euthanasia
Guideline to Supplement to Codes of Practice Greyhound Euthanasia Greyhounds which are physically healthy and behaviourally sound should be given the opportunity to be kept as a companion animal. Greyhounds
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH CRI [2016] NZDC SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Prosecutor
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH CRI-2015-054-003421 [2016] NZDC 3937 SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Prosecutor v TODD NICOL Defendant Hearing: 9 March 2016 Appearances: M Blaschke
More informationINQUIRY NUMBERS: EXP35 and EXP36 of 2016 Sam Cauchi and Patricia Cauchi (the Cauchis) Mr Adrian Anderson (Steward)
DECISION GREYHOUND RACING NSW INQUIRY NUMBERS: EXP35 and EXP36 of 2016 PARTICIPANTS: Sam Cauchi and Patricia Cauchi (the Cauchis) PANEL MEMBER(S): Mr Adrian Anderson (Steward) DATE OF DECISION: 31 May
More informationMedia Release 11 May 2017
Media Release 11 May 2017 Date of Hearing: Thursday, 11 May 2017 Venue of Hearing: Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation 49 Elizabeth Street, Richmond, Victoria Panel: Mr. Shane Marshall
More informationIn the Provincial Court of British Columbia
File No: 148923-1 Registry: Victoria In the Provincial Court of British Columbia REGINA v. SYDNEY JAMES HASKELL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE WISHART COPY Crown Counsel: Defence Counsel:
More informationROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS JOHN RICHARD OWEN-THOMAS DECISION
ROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS V JOHN RICHARD OWEN-THOMAS DECISION 1) Mr John Owen-Thomas appeared before the Committee on 14 March 2011 to answer the following charge: That being registered in the
More informationThe Disciplinary Committee of the GBGB were in attendance at a meeting held on 6 July 2018:-
CALENDAR NOTICE (to be published 2018) Disciplinary Committee Inquiries The Disciplinary Committee of the GBGB were in attendance at a meeting held on 6 July 2018:- Mr H Starte (in the chair) Mr R Coughlan
More informationREQUEST TO RETIRE, EXPORT, TRANSFER OR EUTHANASE GREYHOUND
REQUEST TO RETIRE, EXPORT, TRANSFER OR EUTHANASE GREYHOUND Greyhound Racing Prohibition Act 2016 Consent of greyhound authority required in certain other cases The owner of a registered greyhound must
More information2013 No. (W. ) ANIMALS, WALES. The Animal Welfare (Breeding of Dogs) (Wales) Regulations 2013 ANIMAL WELFARE
Draft Regulations laid before the National Assembly for Wales under section 61(2) of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 (and paragraph 34 of Schedule 11 to the Government of Wales Act 2006), for approval by resolution
More information2015 No. 108 ANIMALS, ENGLAND. The Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2015 No. 108 ANIMALS, ENGLAND ANIMAL WELFARE The Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015 Approved by both Houses of Parliament Made - - - - 2nd February
More informationThe Disciplinary Committee of the GBGB were in attendance at a meeting held on 3 October 2017:-
CALENDAR NOTICE (to be published 20 October 2017) Disciplinary Committee Inquiries The Disciplinary Committee of the GBGB were in attendance at a meeting held on 3 October 2017:- Mr K Salmon (in the chair)
More informationThe purpose of this policy is to protect the health, comfort and safety of greyhounds during hot weather.
Hot Weather Policy Policy number: WEL02 Date policy was made April 2005 Commencement date of this version 1 November 2016 Application This policy applies to all persons involved in greyhound racing. Purpose
More informationDOG CONTROL POLICY 2016
DOG CONTROL POLICY 2016 Contents Why do we need a Dog Control Policy? 1 Legislation 2 Obligations of dog owners 3 General Health and Welfare 3 Registration of dogs 3 Micro-chipping of dogs 3 Working dogs
More informationGREYHOUND RACING VICTORIA PROHIBITED SUBSTANCE PENALTY GUIDELINE AND RELEVANT INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PROHIBITED SUBSTANCE OFFENCES
GREYHOUND RACING VICTORIA PROHIBITED SUBSTANCE PENALTY GUIDELINE AND RELEVANT INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PROHIBITED SUBSTANCE OFFENCES 1. Introduction This guideline has been formulated by GRV to provide
More informationRecommendations of the Greyhound Reform Panel
Recommendations of the Greyhound Reform Panel Response from the Australian Veterinary Association Ltd www.ava.com.au The Australian Veterinary Association Limited Recommendations of the Greyhound Reform
More informationMINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT NOTIFICATION. New Delhi, the 15th December, 1998
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 15th December, 1998 S.O. 1074. Whereas the draft Breeding of and Experiments on Animals (Control and Supervision) Rules, 1998 were published,
More informationVETERINARY IRELAND MEDIA RELEASE (Wednesday 13th November 2013)
VETERINARY IRELAND MEDIA RELEASE (Wednesday 13th November 2013) Veterinary Ireland expresses shock that tail docking and dew claw removal of dogs will be permitted Commenting on behalf of Veterinary Ireland,
More informationUnited States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07CV397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master
Case 3:07-cv-00397-HEH Document 17-2 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 8 Background United States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07CV397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master
More informationCITY OF MELVILLE BYLAW NO. 09/2008 A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF CATS AND DOGS IN THE CITY OF MELVILLE.
CITY OF MELVILLE BYLAW NO. 09/2008 A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF CATS AND DOGS IN THE CITY OF MELVILLE. The Council of the City of Melville in the Province of Saskatchewan, enacts
More informationArticle VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs
Sec. 7-53. Purpose. Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs Within the county of Santa Barbara there are potentially dangerous and vicious dogs that have become a serious and widespread
More informationTOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004
BYLAW 2/2004 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANIGAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROHIBITION OF DANGEROUS DOGS AND THE REGULATION AND CONTROL OF ALL OTHER DOGS INCLUDING LICENSING, RUNNING AT LARGE AND IMPOUNDING. The Council
More informationR.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16
Français Dog Owners Liability Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16 Consolidation Period: From January 1, 2007 to the e-laws currency date. Last amendment: 2006, c. 32, Sched. C, s. 13. Skip Table of Contents
More informationROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS MR AMIR KASHIV MRCVS FINDINGS OF FACT AND ON DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT IN A PROFESSIONAL RESPECT
ROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS v MR AMIR KASHIV MRCVS FINDINGS OF FACT AND ON DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT IN A PROFESSIONAL RESPECT 1. Mr Kashiv appears before the Disciplinary Committee to answer four heads
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED.
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI-2016-004-004392 [2017] NZDC 12019 AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Prosecutor v IRENE LAGOCKI
More informationUnited States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07C V397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master
Case 3:07-cv-00397-HEH Document 17-2 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 8 Background United States v. Approximately 53 Pit Bull Dogs Civil Action No.: 3:07C V397 (E.D. Va.) Summary Report Guardian/Special Master
More information1 Short Title This Bylaw may be cited as the Clutha District Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016.
CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL REGULATORY BYLAWS PART 6 DOG CONTROL Pursuant to the powers vested in it by the Local Government Act 2002, the Dog Control Act 1996 and all other powers thereunder enabling the
More information2016 No. 58 ANIMALS. The Microchipping of Dogs (Scotland) Regulations 2016
S C O T T I S H S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2016 No. 58 ANIMALS ANIMAL WELFARE The Microchipping of Dogs (Scotland) Regulations 2016 Made - - - - 28th January 2016 Coming into force - - 29th
More informationDOGS (JERSEY) LAW 1961
DOGS (JERSEY) LAW 1961 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2018 This is a revised edition of the law Dogs (Jersey) Law 1961 Arrangement DOGS (JERSEY) LAW 1961 Arrangement Article PART 1 5
More informationIn the Provincial Court of British Columbia (BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUDGE E. C. BLAKE)
66- Quesnel Registry In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUDGE E. C. BLAKE) REGINA v. JOLYNN MARY BLAIKIE DALE BLAIKIE Quesnel, B.C. May 0, 007 PROCEEDINGS AT SENTENCING
More informationPublic consultation on Proposed Revision of the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes 2004
RESEARCH INTEGRITY Animal Ethics Committee Web: http://sydney.edu.au/research_support/ethics Project Officer Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes Health and
More information2018 No. 486 ANIMALS, ENGLAND. The Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (England) Regulations 2018
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2018 No. 486 ANIMALS, ENGLAND The Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (England) Regulations 2018 Made - - - - 16th April 2018 Coming into
More informationCounty of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES
County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE TITLE 6 ANIMALS CHAPTER 6.20 KENNELS/CATTERIES SECTION 6.20.010. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS.
More informationQ1 The effectiveness of the Act in reducing the number of out of control dogs/dog attacks in Scotland.
PAPLS/S5/18/COD/20 PUBLIC AUDIT AND POST-LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE CONTROL OF DOGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010 CALL FOR EVIDENCE SUBMISSION FROM National Dog Warden Association Scotland. Q1 The effectiveness
More informationFor publication. The Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 Designation of the Public Spaces Protection Order (Dog control) (HW1140)
For publication The Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 Designation of the Public Spaces Protection Order (Dog control) (HW1140) Meeting: Cabinet Date: 24 th April 2018 Cabinet portfolio:
More informationRSPCA SA v Ross and Fitzpatrick Get the Facts
RSPCA SA v Ross and Fitzpatrick Get the Facts RSPCA South Australia is releasing the following questions and answers to address the extensive misinformation being communicated on social media about our
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No.: 3:07CV397 APPROXIMATELY 53 PIT BULLDOGS, Defendant. MOTION
More informationDog Control Bylaw 2018
Dog Control Bylaw 2018 Date Made: 07 June 2018 Commencement: 01 July 2018 Dog Control Bylaw 2018 Page 2 Contents Part 1: Introduction... 4 1 Short Title and Commencement... 4 2 Revocation... 4 3 Purpose...
More informationCITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265
CITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265 Consolidation to January 14, 2013 A Bylaw to authorize the Municipal Council of the City of Lacombe, in the Province of Alberta to provide for the keeping and registration of
More informationKey Stage 3 Lesson Plan Debating Animal Welfare Laws
Key Stage 3 Lesson Plan Debating Animal Welfare Laws A good lesson to do prior to this one is to book a RespectaBULL workshop from the Blue Cross. Some existing dog legislation is covered in the workshop
More informationHolroyd City Council Low Kill Policy Brooke Littman, Environmental Health & Waste Education Officer, Holroyd City Council
Holroyd City Council Low Kill Policy Brooke Littman, Environmental Health & Waste Education Officer, Holroyd City Council Abstract In September 2002, Holroyd City Council adopted a Low Kill Policy for
More informationDangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents
Dangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents 1. Introduction and Definition 2. Legislation Relating to Dangerous Dogs 3. Assessing Risks to Children and Young People 4. Protection and Action to be
More informationFairfield Pet Lodge Terms & Conditions
Fairfield Pet Lodge Terms & Conditions Please read these terms and conditions carefully before using Fairfield services and facilities. Every effort will be made to draw your attention to our Terms and
More informationThe purpose of this policy is to delineate the functions, roles and responsibilities of the FAU IACUC membership.
Division of Research SUBJECT: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: Role and Function Effective Date: April 28, 2017 Supersedes: 10.4.1 FAU Policies and Procedures Manual Responsible Authorities:
More informationGeneral administrative review matters
CITATION: PARTIES: APPLICATION NUMBER: MATTER TYPE: Bradshaw v Moreton Bay Regional Council [2017] QCAT 281 Tammy Bradshaw (Applicant) v Moreton Bay Regional Council (Respondent) GAR136-17 General administrative
More informationBY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW
BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW Title 1. This By-Law shall be known and may be cited as the Dog Control By-Law and is enacted to provide for the orderly control of dogs in the County of Inverness. 2. This
More informationLANGSTANE HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PET POLICY
LANGSTANE HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PET POLICY 1. Introduction The Association acknowledges that various studies have shown that keeping pets has a beneficial effect to the physical health and social
More informationPUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDERS DOG CONTROLS CULTURE AND LEISURE (COUNCILLOR PETER BRADBURY)
CARDIFF COUNCIL CYNGOR CAERDYDD CABINET MEETING: 12 JULY 2018 PUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDERS DOG CONTROLS CULTURE AND LEISURE (COUNCILLOR PETER BRADBURY) AGENDA ITEM: 3 Reason for this Report 1. To consider
More informationCompanion Animals Amendment Act 2013 No 86
New South Wales Companion Animals Amendment Act 2013 No 86 Contents 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of Companion Animals Regulation 2008 12 Schedule 3 Amendment of Criminal Procedure
More informationIRISH COURSING CLUB. IRISH GREYHOUND STUD BOOK (Part 5)
1 IRISH COURSING CLUB IRISH GREYHOUND STUD BOOK (Part 5) As revised and approved by the Club at a General Meeting of the Club and approved by Bord na gcon in accordance with the Greyhound Industry Act,
More informationSGV POLICY ON THE TRANSPORT OF INJURED GREYHOUNDS
SGV POLICY ON THE TRANSPORT OF INJURED GREYHOUNDS The Society of Greyhound Veterinarians has produced this document to aid decision making by track vets, and to increase awareness of the new EU Transport
More informationBill of Sale and Contract SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION:
Bill of Sale and Contract This Bill of Sale and Contract (hereinafter referred to as Contract ) is entered into by and between Carrie Franz, (hereinafter referred to as Breeder) and the buyer (hereinafter
More informationGUIDANCE FOR VETERINARY SURGEONS. Use of norethisterone for oestrus suppression in racing bitches in Great Britain
GUIDANCE FOR VETERINARY SURGEONS Use of norethisterone for oestrus suppression in racing bitches in Great Britain The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has confirmed that norethisterone, an authorised
More informationV E T E R I N A R Y C O U N C I L O F I R E L A N D ETHICAL VETERINARY PRACTICE
V E T E R I N A R Y C O U N C I L O F I R E L A N D ETHICAL VETERINARY PRACTICE ETHICAL VETERINARY PRACTICE The term Ethical Veterinary Practice is a wide ranging one, implying as it does, compliance with
More informationBY-LAW A By-law of the town of Rothesay Respecting Animal Control, Enacted Under the Municipalities Act, Section 96(1), R.S.N.B. 1973, c.
BY-LAW 01-12 A By-law of the town of Rothesay Respecting Animal Control, Enacted Under the Municipalities Act, Section 96(1), R.S.N.B. 1973, c.m-22 The Council of the town of Rothesay Duly Assembled Enacts
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION
BILL NO. 2005.68 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2005.76 AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS 2006.48, 2006.60 AND 2006.76 CONSOLIDATED VERSION BEING A BYLAW FOR THE LICENSING AND REGULATING
More informationTHE LAY OBSERVERS REPORT TO COUNCIL AND THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE S RESPONSE
ROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS RCVS COUNCIL 2008 THE LAY OBSERVERS REPORT TO COUNCIL AND THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE S RESPONSE [The text of the Lay Observers report is set out below
More informationVIKTOR MOLNAR MRCVS DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
ROYAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS INQUIRY RE: VIKTOR MOLNAR MRCVS DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE The Respondent, Viktor Molnar MRCVS, was served with a Notice of Inquiry, which contained the
More informationREGULATIONS. SECTION R The REGISTER and REGISTRATIONS
THE CANINE ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (INCORPORATED) REGULATIONS SECTION R The REGISTER and REGISTRATIONS Effective 1 st July 2017 Latest Amendment November 2017 This document must be read in conjunction
More informationRESULTS OF LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ALISON PIEARCE AND PEDIGREEDOGS.CO.UK
RESULTS OF LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ALISON PIEARCE AND PEDIGREEDOGS.CO.UK 6 th December 2006 This web page is being published because some time ago members of the Finnish Spitz Club and Finnish Spitz Society
More informationDOG BITES 101 IN ARKANSAS. Recovery can be sought from not only the animal s owner, but sometimes from other responsible individuals as well
DOG BITES 101 IN ARKANSAS Recovery can be sought from not only the animal s owner, but sometimes from other responsible individuals as well Wesley A. Cottrell Each year, thousands of Americans suffer animal
More informationReview of the Northern Territory Animal Welfare Act
Review of the Northern Territory Animal Welfare Act From the Australian Veterinary Association Ltd 10 April 2014 Graham Pratt, Executive Officer SA and NT Divisions, Australian Veterinary Association,
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 17, 30th January, No. 1 of 2014
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 17, 30th January, 2014 No. 1 of 2014 Fourth Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BILL
More informationA BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS
A BYLAW OF THE TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS The Council of the Town of Langham in the Province of Saskatchewan Enacts as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS a) Administrator means the Town Administrator of
More informationFINAL DECISION AND SECTION 43 STATEMENT TO THE VETERINARY COUNCIL BY THE COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE Dr B. CAC (Complaint by Mr A)
FINAL DECISION AND SECTION 43 STATEMENT TO THE VETERINARY COUNCIL BY THE COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE Dr B CAC2-12-06 (Complaint by Mr A) Mr A Dr B C Ms D E Complainant Veterinarian complained against
More informationREGULATIONS. SECTION R The REGISTER and REGISTRATIONS
THE CANINE ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (INCORPORATED) REGULATIONS SECTION R The REGISTER and REGISTRATIONS Effective 1 st July 2017 Latest Amendment April 2017 This document must be read in conjunction
More information180 Degree Rescue Canine Adoption Contract
180 Degree Rescue Canine Adoption Contract *********Please read so you know what you re signing and understand fully. If you have a question or don t completely understand, Please ask. Not following through
More informationAND WHEREAS by motion 13-GC-253 the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Bracebridge deems it expedient to amend By-law ;
A BY-LAW OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF BRACEBRIDGE TO REQUIRE THE LICENSING OF DOGS AND FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS WITHIN THE TOWN OF BRACEBRIDGE WHEREAS Section 8 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, (hereinafter
More informationCLUB GENERAL CODE OF ETHICS. All members of the Southern West Highland White Terrier Club undertake to abide by its general Code of Ethics.
HIGHLAND WHITE TERRIER CLUB GENERAL CODE OF ETHICS All members of the Southern West Highland White Terrier Club undertake to abide by its general Code of Ethics. Club Members: 1. Will properly house,
More informationBYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.
BYLAW NUMBER 152-15 BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS. WHEREAS THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT, RSA 2000, c. M-26 ENABLES COUNCIL OF A MUNICIPALITY
More informationCITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013
CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013 A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF HUMBOLDT TO REGULATE AND CONTROL THE OWNERSHIP AND POSSESSION OF DOGS AND CATS WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS the City of Humboldt is empowered by Section
More informationChief Administrative Officer or CAO means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village or their designate.
VILLAGE OF VETERAN BYLAW NO. 511-13 DOG BYLAW BEING A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF VETERAN IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE LICENSING, REGULATION AND CONTROL OF DOGS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF VETERAN. WHEREAS,
More informationDog and Cat Management Board. Approval of Greyhound Muzzle Exemptions
Dog and Cat Management Board Approval of Greyhound Muzzle Exemptions Document Control: Title Type Creator Author/s Consultation Date Released Review Date 27 May 2016 Reviewer Version 1 Description Keywords
More informationDogs Trust Pawlicy Document
Dogs Trust Pawlicy Document 1891 Dogs Trust was founded as the National Canine Defence League 1908 Dogs Trust introduced the Cruelty to Animals (Amendment) Bill 1912 Our first rehoming centre opened its
More informationInvestigation into animal welfare and cruelty in the Victorian greyhound industry
Investigation into animal welfare and cruelty in the Victorian greyhound industry Final Report 30 April 2015 Dr Charles Milne Chief Veterinary Officer 30 April 2015 The State of Victoria Department of
More informationVETERINARY SURGEONS (JERSEY) LAW 1999
VETERINARY SURGEONS (JERSEY) LAW 1999 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2018 This is a revised edition of the law Veterinary Surgeons (Jersey) Law 1999 Arrangement VETERINARY SURGEONS (JERSEY)
More informationJOINT BVA-BSAVA-SPVS RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON PROPOSALS TO TACKLE IRRESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP
JOINT BVA-BSAVA-SPVS RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON PROPOSALS TO TACKLE IRRESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP June 2012 1. The British Veterinary Association (BVA), the British Small Animal Veterinary Association
More informationIC Chapter 4. Practice; Discipline; Prohibitions
IC 25-38.1-4 Chapter 4. Practice; Discipline; Prohibitions IC 25-38.1-4-1 Veterinary technician identification; use of title or abbreviation; advertising Sec. 1. (a) During working hours or when actively
More informationBlacks Harbour BY-LAW NO. R.2. A By-law of the Village of Blacks Harbour Respecting Animal Control
Blacks Harbour BY-LAW NO. R.2 A By-law of the Village of Blacks Harbour Respecting Animal Control Under the authority vested in it under the Municipalities Act, Section 96(1), R.S.N.B. 1973, C.M- 22, the
More informationANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS
ANIMALS Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION 284.1.1 Animal Control Officer - defined 284.1.2 Deputy CAO/Clerk - defined 284.1.3 Dog - defined 284.1.4 Owner - defined CHAPTER INDEX Article 1 INTERPRETATION
More informationAppendix One: The British Sieger Event
Appendix One: The British Sieger Event Section A Class Definitions Class Name Age Health Requirements Qualifications Class Requirements Baby Puppy From 16 weeks None None Identification not exceeding 6
More informationPUPPY SALES CONTRACT
PUPPY SALES CONTRACT For Puppy Name:.. This Puppy Sales Contract is made this day of...,_..., and is between Devonbeesky Bulldogs the breeder(s) and the Buyer as named below and is classed as absolute:
More informationINVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL. Bylaw 2018/2 Dog Control
INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL Bylaw 2018/2 Dog Control [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] CONTENTS SECTION Page 1. SHORT TITLE AND COMMENCEMENT... 1 2. PURPOSE OF BYLAW... 1 3. REPEAL... 1 4. EXCLUSIONS...
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF ARGYLE BY-LAW # 12A DOGS
MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF ARGYLE BY-LAW # 12A DOGS 1. SHORT TITLE This By-Law is entitled the Dog By-Law. 2. DEFINITIONS In this By-Law: (e) (f) (g) canine madness a form of rabid madness non-communicable
More informationCITATION: Streicher v. The Corporation of the Township of Perth East, 2014 ONSC 1643 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: DC JR DATE: ONTARIO
CITATION: Streicher v. The Corporation of the Township of Perth East, 2014 ONSC 1643 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: DC-12-424-JR DATE: 20140404 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT F. N. MARROCCO
More informationDOG LICENCING BYLAW NO EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 24, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY
CITY OF RICHMOND DOG LICENCING BYLAW NO. 7138 EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 24, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY This is a consolidation of the bylaws below. The amendment bylaws have been combined with the
More informationVILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.
VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW 251-17 2017 A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS. WHEREAS WHEREAS NOW THEREFORE The Municipal Government Act and
More informationBERMUDA 2008 : 28 DOGS ACT 2008
BERMUDA 2008 : 28 DOGS ACT 2008 Date of Assent: 21 July 2008 Operative Date: Notice in Gazette ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Short title 2 Interpretation 3 Duty of Minister 4 Ownership of dogs 5 Dogs to be
More informationQUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CITATION: PARTIES: APPLICATION NO/S: MATTER TYPE: Balens v Moreton Bay Regional Council [2018] QCAT 297 MARK ANDREW BALENS (applicant) v MORETON BAY REGIONAL
More informationBYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE TOWN OF STETTLER.
BYLAW NUMBER 2050-14 BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE TOWN OF STETTLER. WHEREAS THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT, RSA 2000, c. M-26 ENABLES COUNCIL OF A MUNICIPALITY TO
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO/S: DIVISION: PROCEEDING: Kylie Louise Chivers v Gold Coast City Council [2010] QSC 98 KYLIE LOUISE CHIVERS (applicant) v GOLD COAST CITY COUNCIL (respondent)
More informationService Dog Application
Thank you for requesting a service dog from the Dog Alliance. To qualify for a service dog under this program you need to have been discharged from the military with an honorable or medical discharge or
More informationMales $ 1,950 Females $ 1,650
Rosehall Shepherds Information Pages: (last update 2/28/17) How much do Rosehall puppies cost? All puppies are sold with Limited AKC Registration. Males $ 1,950 Females $ 1,650 There will be an occasional
More informationALEXANDRINA COUNCIL DOGS BY-LAW By-law No. 5 OF 2016
ALEXANDRINA COUNCIL DOGS BY-LAW 2016 By-law No. 5 OF 2016 A By-law to limit the number of dogs kept on premises and for the management and control of dogs in the Council area. CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY...
More informationTHOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383
0 THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383 A BYLAW TO REGULATE THE CONTROL OF DANGEROUS DOGS IN ELECTORAL AREAS "1", "M", "N" and "P" OF THE THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT
More informationA Proposed Submission to the GHRRA for an Animal Welfare Policy Framework for the Greyhound Industry
A Proposed Submission to the for an Animal Welfare Policy Framework for the Greyhound Industry Issued: February 25, 2005 Greyhound Racing NSW Quad 2, Level 2, 8 Parkview Drive Homebush Bay NSW 2127 Correspondence
More informationANNUAL REPORT DOG CONTROL POLICY AND PRACTICES
2013-2014 ANNUAL REPORT DOG CONTROL POLICY AND PRACTICES 1 NAPIER CITY COUNCIL DOG CONTROL POLICY AND PRACTICES ANNUAL REPORT 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 This is the eleventh Annual Report in respect of
More informationDOG CONTROL POLICY. Effective from 28 August 2018
DOG CONTROL POLICY Effective from 28 August 2018 This Policy outlines how Invercargill City Council s Animal Services Department will fulfil its responsibility under the Dog Control Act 1996. This Policy
More informationTHE WORKING KELPIE COUNCIL OF AUST. INC.
THE WORKING KELPIE COUNCIL OF AUST. INC. P O Box 306, Castle Hill NSW 1765 Telephone: (02) 9899 9224 Fax: (02) 9894 2140 Email: admin@wkc.org.au INTRODUCTION The first National Kelpie Field Trial was held
More informationGRNSW CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE KEEPING OF GREYHOUNDS IN TRAINING
GRNSW CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE KEEPING OF GREYHOUNDS IN TRAINING Introduction This Code of Practice has been developed for participants licensed by Greyhound Racing New South Wales (GRNSW) involved in
More informationBYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS
BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS The council of the Town of Regina Beach, in the Province of Saskatchewan
More information