SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - PART 22. Justice. Submitted October 11, 2005 Plaintiff,
|
|
- Martha Wilkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - PART 22 Present: HON. WilLIAM R. lamarca Justice AMANDA L. MillER, Motion Sequence # 001 Submitted October 11, 2005 Plaintiff, -against- INDEX NO: 16863/04 MARK ISACOFF and MINDY ISACOFF, Defendants. The following papers were read on this motion: Notice of Motion Affirmation in Opposition Reply Aff rmation Defendants, MARK ISACOFF and MINDY ISACOFF, move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 93212, granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that there are no triable issues of fact or law to be determined. Plaintiff, AMANDA L. MILLER opposes the motion which is determined as follows: This negligence action seeks money damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff as a result of dog bites to her upper lip that occurred on September 2004 at the defendants' home located at 1047 Robin Road, Franklin Square, New York. In essence, plaintiff alleges that, while a guest in the defendants ' home, she was, without
2 provocation, viciously attacked by the defendants' German Shepherd dog, Max, who was left untethered and without supervision. Plaintiff alleges that Max had vicious propensities that were known to the defendants and that gross and wanton negligence for which they are strictly liable. permitting the dog to run loose constitutes In support of the motion to dismiss, defendants annex the transcripts of the parties deposition testimony which reflect that defendants acquired Max as a pet for their children from the North Shore Animal League in 1995 and that, over the years, the dog has suffered from a series of ilnesses that caused his weight to drop from 75 pounds to approximately 38 pounds at the time of the accident. MARK ISACOFF relates that the dog developed an enlarged prostate, anal sac disease and anal fistulas that required the surgical removal of the animals testicles and his tail. Additionally, within the last two (2) years, the dog was diagnosed with colitis which required treatment with medications. Nonetheless, both he and his wife assert that Max never barked at other dogs, never strained at the leash and never growled, except in a game of tug of war. They state that the only change in the dog s behavior from his sickness was that he became more docile and more sensitive if his hind quarters were touched and, in that event, he would yelp or cry - not bark or growl. They claim that they had no knowledge that the dog had ever snapped or bit or growled at any people that entered their home before and point to plaintiff' s deposition testimony where she acknowledged that the dog never growled or snapped at her before the incident. MINDY ISACOFF stated at her deposition that the family never received any complaints about Max and that he neither barked, nor growled, snapped nor bared his teeth to others. She claims that when face to face with the dog he would lick her face and that he had no history of biting. Defendants assert that the dog had never shown any vicious propensities
3 and urge that the Court follow a long line of cases that hold that, in the absence of actual or constructive knowledge of a dogs vicious propensities, a dog s owner is not liable when it bites someone, citing, inter alia, Mindel v Jones 16 AD3d 857, 791 NYS2d 692 (3 Dept. 2005); Czarnecki v Welch 13 Ad3d 962, 786 NYS2d 659 (3rd Dept. 2004); and Coller v Zambito 1 NY3d NYS2d 205, 807 NE2d 254 (C.A. 2004). In opp sition to the motion, counsel for plaintiff states that defendants knew, or should have Jnown of the dog s vicious propensities, in that he constantly barked at their neighbor, charged her fence and kicked dirt onto her property, barked and growled at all visitors to the front door and suffered from a long series of chronic ilnesses and treatment that left it hyp r-sensitive when ever anyone came near it. An affidavit of Jeanne Burrouso defendants eighbor for approximately forty four (44) years, indicates a number of disturbing incidents involving the dog which she claims frightened her and her mother. She claims the dog would "bark like crazy and charge the fence" causing dirt onto to her property and that she and her mother feared he would jump the fence. She states that Mr. ISACOFF had no control over the dog and that when he ran in circles around her, Mr. ISACOFF stated that the dog was acting that way because he " smelled fear. She claims that on several occasions she complained to the ISACOFF's about the dog but that Mr. ISACOFF was insensitive to her concerns. She stated that Max was usually left in the defendants' backyard alone and unattended. Pictures of the defendants ' property show BEWARE OF DOG" signs on the back yard gates. It is plaintiff' s testimony that she attended a Labor Day party at the defendants home on the evening of the incident and that she passed Max in the kitchen of defendants home numerous times when she entered the home from the backyard to use the bathroom.
4 She states that the last time she entered, she leaned down to pet the dog and he turned and, without provocation, attacked her, which resulted in multiple facial bite wounds and two (2) surgeries. Plaintiff urges that clear issues offact exist as to whether the defendants knew or should have known about their dog s vicious propensities and that summary judgment is not warranted. It is well settled that absolute liabilty attaches for injuries caused by a domesticated dog where the dog is "found to have vicious propensities, of which its owner knows, or should know Lynch v Nacewicz 126 AD2d 708, 511 NYS2d 121 (2 Dept. 1987). In demonstrating such vicious propensities " proof of a previous attack is unnecessary where other factors are indicative of knowledge (see, Perotta v Picciano 186 App. Div Society, 175 NYS 16)". Brophy v Columbia County Agricultural 116 AD2d 873, 498 NYS2d 193 (3 Dept 1986). Those other factors include the nature of the attack on the plaintiff Lynch v Nasewicz, supra; Moriano v Schmidt 133 AD2d NYS2d 416 (2 Dept. 1987), the dogs tendency to bark or lunge at strangers Sorel v Iacobucci 221 AD2d NYS2d 688 (3 Dept. 1995); Moriano v Schmidt, supra, Fontecchio v Esposito, 108 AD2d 780, 485 NYS2d 113 (2 Dept 1985), and the precautions taken to restrain the dog Lagoda v Dorr, 28 AD2d 208, 284 NYS2d 130 (3 Dept. 1967); Moriano v Schmidt, supra. The issue of whether a dog possessed the requisite "vicious propensities" to impose liability, and whether the owners new, or should have known, of those propensities, is a question of fact for a jury. Wheaton v Guthrie 89 AD2d 809, 453 NYS2d 480 (4 Dept. 1982).
5 In viewing motions for summary judgment, it is well settled that summary judgment is a drastic remedy which may only be granted where there is no clear triable issue of fact (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361, 362 NYS2d 131, 320 NE2d 853 (C.A. 1974); Mosheyev v Pilevsky, 283 AD2d NYS2d 206 (2 Dept. 2001). Indeed, "(e)ven the color of a triable issue, forecloses the remedy Rudnitsky v Robbins 191 AD2d 488, 594 NYS2d 354 (2 Dept. 1993)). Moreover "(i)t is axiomatic that summary judgment requires issue finding rather than issue-determination and that resolution of issues of credibility is not appropriate (Greco v Posillco 290 AD2d 532, 736 NYS2d 418 (2 Dept. 2002); Judice v DeAngelo, 272 AD2d 583, 709 NYS2d 817 (2 Dept. 2000); see also S. CapelinAssociates, Inc. v Globe Mfg. Corp. 34 NY2d NYS2d NE2d 776 (C.A.1974)). Further, on a motion for summary judgment, the submissions ofthe opposing party s pleadings must be accepted as true (see Glover v City of New York 298 AD2d NYS2d 393 (2 Dept. 2002)). As is often stated, the facts must be viewed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. (See, Mosheyev v Pilevsky, supra). The burden on the moving party for summary judgment is to demonstrate a prime facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issue offact (Ayotte v Gervasio 81 NY2d NYS2d NE2d 400 (C. A.1993); Winegrad v New York University Medical Center, 64 NY2d 851, 487 NYS2d 316, 476 NE2d 642 (C. A. 1985); Drago v King, 283AD2d 603, 725 NYS2d 859 Dept. 2001)). If the initial burden is met, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party to come forward with evidence to demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact requiring a trial. (CPLR9 3212, subd (b); see also GTF Marketing, Inc. v Colonial Aluminum
6 Sales, Inc. 66 NY2d 965, 498 NYS2d 7 6, 489 NE2d 755 (C. A. 1985); Zuckerman v City of New York 49 NY2d NYS2d NE2d 718 (C.A. 1980)). The non-moving part must lay bare all of the facts at its disposal regarding the issues raiseq in the motion. (Mgrditchian v Donato, 141 AD2d 513, 529 NYS2d 134 (2 Dept. 1988)). After a careful reading of the submissions herein, it is the judgment ofthe Court that defendants have failed to demonstrate that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On the record before it, the Court finds that plaintiff has raised sufficient issues of fact, as to whether defendants knew, or should have known, of the dogs vicious propensities, given the animals extended ilnesses and the neighbor s repeated complaints, that require a trial. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that defendant' s motion for an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied. All further requested relief not specifically granted is denied. This constitutes the decision and order of the Court. Dated: January 3, 2006 WILLIAM R. LaMARCA, J. TO: Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 1399 Franklin Avenue, Suite 201 Garden City, NY John P. Humphreys, Esq. Attorney for Defendants 3 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 102S Melvile, NY "te.f\eo SSp.U COUN1 C\. lr;r;d OUN"..1 S off\ce miler-isaco,ti1/sumjudg
Kachenkov v Vadala 2013 NY Slip Op 30971(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 12736/11 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New
Kachenkov v Vadala 2013 NY Slip Op 30971(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 12736/11 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 29, 2005 97764 DYLAN LOPER, an Infant, by SUSAN M. LOPER, et al., His Parents and Guardians,
More informationArgued May 9, 2017 Decided September 5, Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationVan Leer v Incalcatera 2013 NY Slip Op 31798(U) August 1, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Arthur G. Pitts Republished from
2013 NY Slip Op 31798(U) August 1, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 10-46420 Judge: Arthur G. Pitts Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts)
More informationLodico v Ingrassia 2010 NY Slip Op 33634(U) December 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Peter H. Mayer Republished from
2010 NY Slip Op 33634(U) December 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 09-10360 Judge: Peter H. Mayer Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts
More informationTOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004
BYLAW 2/2004 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANIGAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROHIBITION OF DANGEROUS DOGS AND THE REGULATION AND CONTROL OF ALL OTHER DOGS INCLUDING LICENSING, RUNNING AT LARGE AND IMPOUNDING. The Council
More informationFrank v Animal Haven, Inc NY Slip Op 30441(U) February 21, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished
Frank v Animal Haven, Inc. 2012 NY Slip Op 30441(U) February 21, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 108894/09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY
SCANNEDON 1011612013... SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: g?&.. 2.c :. - *; - I. I, Justice PART L)t Index Number : 402392/2010 KOVALEVICH, MARCIA vs. RHEA, JOHN B. SEQUENCE
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION RIVIERA CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC.,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION STONE S THROW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-588
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2009 MARIE TATMAN AND CHARLES TATMAN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-588 SPACE COAST KENNEL CLUB, INC., ET AL., Appellee. /
More informationMEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
NoDa Bark and Board MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION Today s date: OWNER INFORMATION: (Please print) Name: Address: City: _ State: Zip: Home Phone: _ Cell: _ Employer: _ Work Phone: E-mail Address: EMERGENCY CONTACT:
More informationArticle VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs
Sec. 7-53. Purpose. Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs Within the county of Santa Barbara there are potentially dangerous and vicious dogs that have become a serious and widespread
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. Defendants
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE CITATION: Wiens v. Mino, 2018 ONSC 3234 COURT FILE NO.: CV-15-73-00A1 DATE: 2018-05-24 BETWEEN: HAYDEN WIENS by his litigation guardian, KRIS WIENS, KRIS WIENS and Annette
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 30, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D16-314 & 3D15-2609 Lower Tribunal No. 13-18732
More informationTEXAS DOG BITE CLAIMS
TEXAS DOG BITE CLAIMS C. Brooks Schuelke Schuelke Law Firm PLLC Table Of Contents Texas Dog Bite Problems 01 What Are Your Claims? 02 Does Texas Have A "One-Bite" Rule? 03 Make Your Claim As Soon As Possible
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. 3. VICIOUS DOGS. CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business restricted.
More informationBEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT INTAKE FORM
BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT INTAKE FORM Your Name: Date: Address: Phone # City: Zip: Who referred you to us? DOG INFORMATION Dog of concern; Name, Breed, Sex, Weight and Age: How long have you owned or fostered
More informationIN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto
IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff Case No. 14 CRB 157 AIL -vs- JASON HARRIS Defendant MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANT, JASON HARRIS Pursuant to this Court's Order, Defendant, Jason
More informationWALTER J. ROTHSCHILD JUDGE Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Walter J. Rothschild, and Fredericka Homberg Wicker
NO. ll-ca-832 FIFTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, CANON HEALTH CARE, LLC/T.L.H.C. AND CANON HOSPICE, LLC COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More information2012 PA Super 91. Appeal from the Order of April 20, 2011 In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County Civil Division at No(s): 2768 of 2008
2012 PA Super 91 RHONDA L. ROSENBERRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF ALEXANDER W. PRINCE, A MINOR, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. TANYA EVANS, MITCHELL KING AND
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION CAMELOT TWO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
More information(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:
505.16 VICIOUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS (a) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this section: (1) "Director of Public Safety" means the City official
More informationTown of Northumberland LOCAL LAW 3 OF 2010 DOG CONTROL LAW
Town of Northumberland LOCAL LAW 3 OF 2010 DOG CONTROL LAW Purpose The Town of Northumberland finds that the running at large and other uncontrolled behavior of licensed and unlicensed dogs has caused
More informationVILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.
VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW 251-17 2017 A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS. WHEREAS WHEREAS NOW THEREFORE The Municipal Government Act and
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION The Fairways at Emerald Greens Condominium
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Royal Stewart Arms Condominium No. 5, Inc.,
More informationDep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017)
Dep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017) Evidence established that two dogs, Jacob and Panda, are dangerous under the New York City Health Code because they
More informationPLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT
PLEASE READ ENTIRE AGREEMENT BEFORE SIGNING ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. PET AGREEMENT Owner(s) Address: Unit No: OF ACADIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., SUN CITY CENTER, FLORIDA Identification
More informationCauses of Aggression
Causes of Aggression Before I begin to address this topic, I d like to address the misguided people who diagnose a dog as aggressive without proper evaluation. I ve fought court battles over this topic,
More informationTMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:
CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS Dangerous Dogs 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons Checklist 17-1 Script/Notes Definitions: Animal control authority is a municipal or county animal control office with authority over
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
10-1 CHAPTER 1. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS AND CATS. 3. DANGEROUS ANIMALS. TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL SECTION 10-101. Running at large prohibited. 10-102. Keeping near a residence or business
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SOUTH BAY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION RIVCO AT RINGLING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KATHY KOIVISTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION January 8, 2008 9:00 a.m. v No. 272943 Gogebic Circuit Court DAVE DAVIS d/b/a CHIEFTAN KENNELS, LC No. 05-000301-NO
More informationTitle 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and
Title 6 Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC 8.10.040, 8.10.050, and 8.10.180. 6-1 Lyons Municipal Code 6.05.020 Chapter 6.05 Dangerous Dogs Sections:
More informationCORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2012-103 Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs WHEREAS The Municipal Act, R.S.O., 2001 section 103 authorizes the Council of a municipality
More informationCase 3:16-cv JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION GABRIEL STEELE, individually, and as Executor
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Dep't of Health & Mental Hygiene v. McNamara OATH Index No. 2610/11 (Oct. 11, 2011), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. & Order (Jan. 10, 2012), appended Department of Health and Mental Hygiene seeks to
More informationFIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-1481 DEBORAH DAVISON, Appellant, v. REBECCA BERG, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Steven M. Fahlgren, Judge. March
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED.
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI-2016-004-004392 [2017] NZDC 12019 AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Prosecutor v IRENE LAGOCKI
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES FINAL ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Scottsdale Cluster Condominium III Association,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE NORTH LITTLE ROCK AND BEEBE, ARKANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ROADS, INC., RICHARD VENABLE, DARIUS SIMS, MIKE KIERRY and PHILLIP MCCORMICK PLAINTIFFS VS. NO. THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SUNSET GROVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationIn this Article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks an order: (1) striking the Januar 28
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU JOAN T AMBERIO -against- Petitioner MICHELE M. WOODARD TRIAL/IAS Par Index No. : 5440/11 Motion Seq. No.: 01 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MEADOWBROOK
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 19, 2017 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 19, 2017 Session 10/19/2017 COREY M. SEARCY, ET AL. v. WALTER AXLEY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Benton County No. 14-CV-27 Charles
More informationPLEASE KEEP THIS PAGE FOR YOUR RECORDS
General Information about All Pets Dog Daycare DOGS ALL dogs must pass a temperament test prior to their first day of daycare. Temperament tests generally last 1 hour and an appointment is REQUIRED for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY
[Cite as Pangallo v. Adkins, 2014-Ohio-3082.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY JOSEPH PANGALLO, : CASE NO. CA2014-02-019 Plaintiff-Appellant, : O P I N I O N :
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term 2005 ANDREW WARD STEPHEN A. HARTLEY, ET AL.
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 175 September Term 2005 ANDREW WARD V. STEPHEN A. HARTLEY, ET AL. Salmon, Eyler, Deborah S., Bloom, Theodore G. (Ret., Specially Assigned), JJ.
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 190459-2 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 190459-2:n:01/25/2018:KBH/tgw LSA2018-479R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS:
More informationGrand Rapids Housing Commission Ransom Tower Pet and Service Animal Policy
Grand Rapids Housing Commission Ransom Tower Pet and Service Animal Policy Residents who live in Ransom Tower Apartments are permitted to own common household pets defined as A domesticated animal, such
More informationTo get started with boarding or grooming please fill out the attached Boarding and Grooming Application.
Dear New Boarding and Grooming Customers, Thank you for choosing the Prison Pet Partnership to assist you with all of your boarding and grooming needs. We strive to provide the best care possible to your
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect
ORDINANCE NO. 2009-2 WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect and to promote the general health and welfare of its citizens and is
More informationTown of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151
Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151 ANIMAL ORDINANCE Ordinance # Whereby, the Town of Niagara, Marinette County, does hereby adopt Ordinance #, Animal Ordinance, for the purpose of regulating certain
More informationClient Information. Doggie Information
Client Information Client (Person) Name: Emergency contact(s) & numbers: Street Address: City, State, Zip: Phone1: Phone2: Phone3: Email: Alternate contacts: Who is authorized to pick up/drop off your
More information1 ADOPTION AGREEMENT SECAUCUS AN IMAL SHELTER 525 Meadowland Parkway Secaucus, NJ 07094 (201) 348-3213 Dog Application Dog(s)/ Puppy(s) you are interested in adopting: Color and description: ----------------------
More informationDog Licensing Regulation
Ordinance No: 07-04 Dog Licensing Regulation STATE OF WISCONSIN Town of Morrison Brown County SECTION 1 TITLE/PURPOSE The title of this ordinance is the Town of Morrison Dog Licensing Regulation. The purpose
More informationSection 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.
ORDINANCE #33 DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON Adopted: December 7, 2010 Local Law No.3 for the Year 2010 Amended: March 1, 2011-Local Law No. 1 for the Year 2011 Section 7(C) only Published:
More information1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.
1 SB232 2 191591-3 3 By Senators Livingston and Scofield 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18 Page 0 1 SB232 2 3 4 ENROLLED, An Act, 5 Relating to dogs; to create Emily's
More informationPet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision
Purpose: Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision www.stonehengecondoassociation.com The purpose of these rules, effective May 15, 2011, are to establish reasonable requirements for the keeping of dogs
More informationCITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW
CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF MEADOW LAKE TO REGISTER, LICENSE, REGULATE, RESTRAIN AND IMPOUND DOGS CITED AS THE DOG BYLAW. The Council of the City of Meadow Lake,
More informationIn the Provincial Court of British Columbia
File No: 148923-1 Registry: Victoria In the Provincial Court of British Columbia REGINA v. SYDNEY JAMES HASKELL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE WISHART COPY Crown Counsel: Defence Counsel:
More informationDog Profile. Dog s Information: About your Dog s History: Date: / / Animal ID (Staff Use Only): Dog s Name: Breed: Sex: (Check Box) Male Female
Dog Profile Dog s Information: Animal ID (Staff Use Only): Dog s Name: Breed: Sex: (Check Box) Male Female Spayed or Neutered: (Check Box) Yes No Unknown Age: Date of Birth (If Known): About your Dog s
More informationBoarding/Daycare Contract
Boarding/Daycare Contract 1394 230th Street Glenwood City, Wisconsin 54013 715-265-9288 purrfectdog@live.com www.purrfectdog.com All boarding and daycare clients must sign a boarding/daycare contract for
More informationDog Behavior Questionnaire
Dog Behavior Questionnaire Please answer the following questions as completely as possible (use the margins and the back of the pages if needed) and return the completed form by mail or fax 48 hours before
More informationLease Attachment A Pet Policy i
Lease Attachment A Pet Policy i Preface The Pike County Housing Authority (PCHA) allows for responsible pet ownership in its developments. Each pet must be maintained responsibly and in accordance with
More informationCHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Adopted 02/16/2000 Amended 05/19/2004 Amended 04/20/2011 Amended 05/07/2014 604-1 Purpose... 1 604-2 Definitions... 1 1. ABANDONED ANIMAL:... 1
More informationAN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS) The City Council of the City of Rice, Minnesota, hereby ordains that Section 405 (Dogs and Cats) of Chapter IV (Public Safety)
More informationBYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.
BYLAW NUMBER 152-15 BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS. WHEREAS THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT, RSA 2000, c. M-26 ENABLES COUNCIL OF A MUNICIPALITY
More informationRESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:
PROPOSED VICIOUS DOG ORDINANCE: RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance: A. Definitions: Animal Control
More informationTROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO
TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO. 2-11-2016 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE DOG ORDINANCE AS FOUND IN THE CODE OF REVISED ORDINANCES OF TROPIC TOWN. IN the judgment of the Mayor and Tropic Town Council, changes are
More informationTITLE 17 B HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 7 ANIMAL CONTROL
TITLE 17 B HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 7 ANIMAL CONTROL Legislative History: 17 T.O.C. Chapter 7 - Animal Control, was adopted by Resolution No. 07-025 effective January 21, 2007; amended by Referendum 02-12
More informationThe Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth
The Corporation of the By-law 2002-045 (Consolidated as amended) DANGEROUS DOGS BY-LAW A by-law to provide for the muzzling of dogs declared dangerous in the. Consolidation Amendment No. 1 By-law No. 2005-075
More informationAPPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE
APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE TOWN OF CLINTON DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 7, 2000 REVISED JUNE 8, 2004 SECTION l. PURPOSE: This ordinance is adopted in the exercise of municipal home
More informationSAINT BERNARD RESCUE FOUNDATION OREGON/WASHINGTON VOLUNTEER/FOSTER APPLICATION
SAINT BERNARD RESCUE FOUNDATION OREGON/WASHINGTON VOLUNTEER/FOSTER APPLICATION Please complete the following 4 page application and agreements and return to: Oregon Saint Bernard Rescue Allie Kane P.O.
More informationDog Behavior Problems Aggression Getting Started Safety and Management
74 Dog Behavior Problems Aggression Getting Started Safety and Management How do I start treatment of my aggressive dog? If your dog has threatened or displayed any signs of aggression, then the problem
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 24, 2009 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 24, 2009 Session ARNOLD LYNN BOMAR v. HART & COOLEY FLEX DIVISION ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court
More information697 A.2d 947 Page 1 (Cite as: 304 N.J.Super. 1, 697 A.2d 947) Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
697 A.2d 947 Page 1 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. STATE of New Jersey (Township of Washington), Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARVIN J. FRIEDMAN and Marsha Friedman, Defendants-Appellants.
More informationINDIVIDUAL RESCUER ADOPTION APPLICATION/CONTRACT INFORMATION
INDIVIDUAL RESCUER ADOPTION APPLICATION/CONTRACT INFORMATION Rescuer s Name: My goal is to place (insert pet s name) in a permanent, loving home. I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DECLINE ANY APPLICATION. The adoption
More informationC. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.
5-2-1 5-2-1 CHAPTER 2 DOGS SECTION: 5-2-1: License Required; Exemption 5-2-2: License Fee 5-2-3: Term Of License 5-2-4: Publication Of Notice 5-2-5: Application For License 5-2-6: Restrictions And Prohibited
More informationVILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09
VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 BEING A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, REGULATING, AND CONFINEMENT OF DOGS WHEREAS,
More informationGerman Shepherd Rescue of New York, Inc. P.O.Box 242, Delmar, NY
DOG SURRENDER APPLICATION Owner s/surrenderer s Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone: Work/Cell: Email Address: Are you 18 yrs. or older? Yes Date of Birth: REQUIREMENTS OF SURRENDER Proof of ownership
More informationBY-LAW NUMBER A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE MUZZLING OF VICIOUS DOGS
''i''. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING BY-LAW NUMBER 2000-04 A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE MUZZLING OF VICIOUS DOGS WHEREAS Section 210, subsection 10, of the Ontario Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990,
More informationAPPELLANT S MOTION FOR REHEARING. Appellant, Jeanette B. Ringo, most respectfully moves the Honorable Court of Appeals to re-hear
E-Filed Document Mar 11 2016 11:40:25 2014-CA-01313-COA Pages: 13 APPELLANT S MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellant, Jeanette B. Ringo, most respectfully moves the Honorable Court of Appeals to re-hear and re-consider
More informationSTOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT DATE: January 17,2006 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Animal Calls Dead Animals Handling Injured Animals I. POLICY Field
More informationReptiles on the Prowl
Reptiles on the Prowl Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP is the largest defense civil litigation firm based in Central Pennsylvania. With its main office in Harrisburg, PA, the firm
More informationAdjudicator: David TR Parker QC Heard: March 14, 2016 Decision: March 19, 2016
Claim No. SCT 445746 Small Claims Court of Nova Scotia Cite as: Shaver v. Logan, 2016 NSSM 3 Between Whitney Shaver Claimant -and- Heather A Logan Defendant Adjudicator: David TR Parker QC Heard: March
More informationTAUNTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET POLICY
TAUNTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET POLICY Residents of units owned and managed by the Taunton Housing Authority (the "Authority") may own and keep common household pets, provided, that they manage such pets
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP JANET STARICHA, Petitioner,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP 19693 JANET STARICHA, Petitioner, v. FINAL DECISION THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, Respondent. The
More informationORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.
LOWNDES COUNTY 1 ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. A. Domestic
More informationCLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance
CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA Ordinance No. ORD-2002-002 Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance The Town Board of the Township of Clear Lake, County of Sherburne, State
More informationMINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMITTEE Sitting as the Vicious Dog Appeal Committee
TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMITTEE Sitting as the Vicious Dog Appeal Committee APPEAL OF A NOTICE TO MUZZLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BY-LAW 1999-135-RE AS AMENDED HEARD ON THE 16
More informationPAWSITIVELY PERFECT BOARDING & DAYCARE AGREEMENT. Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Home: Work: Cell: Text? Y N
PAWSITIVELY PERFECT BOARDING & DAYCARE AGREEMENT Contact Information: Owner s Name(s): Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Home: Work: Cell: Text? Y N Email: Do you check your email while gone? Y N Emergency
More informationPlease fill this form out completely and it to:
General Application rev 10/1/2015 Please fill this form out completely and email it to: info@northwestgermanshepherd.org Be sure to answer all questions as accurately as possible. Once your application
More informationLOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred
LOCAL LAW Town of Alfred Local Law No. 2 for the year 2010 A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Alfred, Allegany County, New York,
More informationSection 2 Interpretation
COUNTY OF TWO HILLS NO. 21 IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BY-LAW NO. 8-2000 A BY-LAW OF THE COUNTY OF TWO HILLS NO. 21 IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATING AND CONFINEMENT OF DOGS. WHEREAS,
More information2017 VT 88. No Gill Terrace Retirement Apartments, Inc. On Appeal from v. Superior Court, Windsor Unit, Civil Division
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions
More informationTOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322
TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322 (Consolidated to XX) Please note: This is a consolidated bylaw prepared for Convenience only and is not a certified copy. A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING
More informationBY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.
BY-LAW 560/08 A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF BAWLF IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSE REGULATION OF DOGS DETERMINED TO BE AGGRESSIVE OR VICIOUS. WHEREAS WHEREAS THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT,
More informationTITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL
0- TITLE 0 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER. IN GENERAL. 2. DOGS. CHAPTER IN GENERAL SECTION 0-0. Running at large prohibited. 0-02. Keeping near a residence or business restricted. 0-03. Pen or enclosure to be
More information