COW WELFARE ASSESSEMENT TIE STALL SCORING (COMPILATION)

Similar documents
Trigger Factors for Lameness and the Dual Role of Cow Comfort in Herd Lameness Dynamics

Decreasing Lameness and Increasing Cow Comfort on Alberta Dairy Farms

proaction in Ontario Created by Drs. Steven Roche & Kelly Barratt

Nigel B. Cook MRCVS Clinical Associate Professor in Food Animal Production Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine

Dairy Cattle Assessment protocol

What the Research Shows about the Use of Rubber Floors for Cows

Evaluate Environment (page 7-8)

Long and short term strategies to improve claw health and to reduce lameness

Lameness Information and Evaluation Factsheet

The Environment And Mastitis Control. What If the USA Lost the War in Iraq??? Dr. Andy Johnson. Western Canadian Dairy Conference Red Deer, Alberta

Cattle Foot Care And Lameness control

SOP - Claws. SOP - Claws describe working routines that are important to secure claw health and minimize spread af infection between animals.

Dairy Project Record Book Heifer/Cow

LOCOMOTION SCORING OF DAIRY CATTLE DC - 300

Dealing with dairy cow lameness applying knowledge on farm

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Objectives. Lameness in cattle. Herd management of musculoskeletal disorders in. Common musculoskeletal problems. Diseases of the hoof horn

FAIL. Animal Welfare vs Sustainability. 8,776 cows in 67 UK herds. Mean lameness prevalence of 39.1%!!!!!!

Sponsored by: Lameness & Longevity Workshops

Herd Health Plan. Contact Information. Date Created: Date(s) Reviewed/Updated: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Farm Manager: Veterinarian of Record:

Don t be so lame- Time to Implement Solutions to Sore Feet

Environmental and genetic effects on claw disorders in Finnish dairy cattle

Assessing the Welfare of Dairy Cows:

Impact of Flooring on Claw Health and Lameness

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Dairy Project Record Book

Area Dairy Conference - 1/18/ Montezuma Hall

Animal Welfare Assessments and Audits in the US

The Heifer Facility Puzzle: The New Puzzle Pieces

CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CARE AND HANDLING OF DAIRY CATTLE

Lameness and claw lesions as influenced by stall environment and cow comfort

Benchmarking Health and Management across the Canadian Dairy Herd

Cattle lameness: a problem of cows that starts in heifers

NYSCHAP BASELINE SURVEY Cover Page

Technical. Preventing lameness in dairy cows: Hoof lesions; their identification, treatment, management and prevention. N 5 9 9

Lameness in Irish pigs. Laura Boyle Teagasc Moorepark

Cow welfare. This chapter presents an introduction to animal welfare, specifically for dairy cattle.

Reference Manual & Workbook JULY 2018

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle

Typically When & Whom?? When it first starts getting cold and other food sources are becoming scarce. Typically for us that is about mid-november. Whe

Guidelines for selecting good feet and structure. Dr Sarel Van Amstel Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine

Mobility. Measuring mobility using the AssureWel protocol. Dairy Cattle Welfare Outcome Assessment Explanation of measures

Animal Welfare Standards in the Dairy Sector Renée Bergeron, Ph.D., agr. Dairy Outlook Seminar 2013

LAMENESS IN DAIRY CATTLE. G. L. Stokka, J. F. Smith, J. R. Dunham, and T. Van Anne

Foot Health - A Foundation of Animal Care. Karl Burgi Dairyland Hoof Care Institute, Inc Baraboo WI

Dairy Project Record Book

Herd health challenges in high yielding dairy cow systems

Manual & Workbook MARCH 2018

Charmany Dairy Herd Newsletter Oct. 29 th Nov. 4 th Daily Events

Balancing Dairy Business and Animal Welfare. Franklyn Garry

Dairy Project Record Book

Rural Electric Power Services (REPS) Program

DISEASE MONITORING AND EXTENSION SYSTEM FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN DAIRY INDUSTRY

Policies of UK Supermarkets: Liquid milk

INDEX. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type. LAMENESS

Dairy Project Record Book

South West Scotland Dairy Monitor Farm Willie Fleming Hillhead Kirkpatrick-Fleming Lockerbie, DG11 3NQ Tel:

Sheep Care on Small Farms and Homesteads

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Herd-level risk factors for seven different foot lesions in Ontario Holstein cattle housed in tie stalls or free stalls

What is Dairy Production Medicine?

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Traits Points PBA Standards Disqualifying

Animal Care Quick Reference User Guide

HOOF MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO LOCOMOTION SCORES AND CLAW DISORDERS IN DAIRY PRIMIPAROUS COWS

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Claw Health Traits in Spanish Dairy Cattle N. Charfeddine 1, I. Yánez 2 & M. A. Pérez-Cabal 2

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LAMENESS IN DAIRY COWS

Anestrus and Estrous Detection Aids

Behavioral Changes Around Calving and their Relationship to Transition Cow Health

Claw Health Data Recording in Spanish Dairy Cattle

DAIRY CATTLE STUDY GUIDE Livestock Expo Madera County 4-H

Gunnison County Lease-A-Goat Record Junior 2018

Equine Adoption and/or Foster Requirements

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Standards for the Raising and Handling of Dairy Cattle

SOP biosecurity describes the work procedures that are important to secure a high level of biosecurity.

Gunnison County Lease-A-Sheep Record Senior 2014

The Effects of a Gel Mat Stall Surface on the Lying Behavior of Dairy Cattle. Alexa Claire Main. A Thesis. Presented to. The University of Guelph

Eradication of Johne's disease from a heavily infected herd in 12 months

Animal Liberation Queensland Submission on Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines Section A: Cattle 04/05/13

CoPulsation tm Milking System

DAIRY HERD INFORMATION FORM

South West Fertility Field Day. May 2015

Common Diseases. of Sheep and Cattle. Lameness - Sheep. Sandy Redden BVSc

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Gunnison County Lease-A-Sheep Record Intermediate 2013

De Tolakker Organic dairy farm at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Gunnison County Lease-A-Goat Record Intermediate 2014

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

Report on the Welfare of EU Dairy Cows

Proceedings of the 27th World Buiatrics Congress

DAIRY COW WELFARE & UDDER HEALTH Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM, Professor University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

A Helping Hand. We all need a helping hand once in a while

Beef Cattle Husbandry and Breeding

Transcription:

COW WELFARE ASSESSEMENT TIE STALL SCORING (COMPILATION) Farm ID: Type: TS or FS Date: Observer: (province-dhi 5 digit e.g. ON10020) (choose 1 answer) (dd-mm-yyyy) (first name, last name) N.B.: Animal-based measures/in-barn checklist/management questionnaire refer to the group of high-production cows SECTION 1 ACCOMODATION AND HOUSING 1.1. STALL DESIGN A) LYING TIME TARGET: Comfortable dairy cows lie down for 12 h/d. Herd average lying time =.. h/d (calculated from accelerometers on 40 cows x 4 days) Attribute a farm score according to if the measure meets or exceeds, almost meets or does not meet the target Herd average total lying time, h/d FARM SCORE Meets or exceeds TARGET : 12 2 (100 %) Almost meets TARGET: 12 > x > 10 1 (50 %) Does not meet TARGET: 10 0 (0%) CHEKLIST: NO MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE: NO QUESTION Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 1 of 10

B) HOCK, KNEE AND KNECK INJURIES TARGET: Comfortable stalls minimize hock, knee and neck injuries. Measure on each of the 40 focal cows the level of injuries for hock, neck and knee. Attribute a farm score according to the % of cows without injuries for the 3 types of injuries Level of injuries 0 (no injuries) 1(minor injuries) 2 (major injuries) 3 (major + injuries) FARM SCORE Hock % % % % % of 0 injuries Knee % % % % % of 0 injuries Neck % % % N/A % of 0 injuries FARM SCORE = sum/3 CHEKLIST: NO MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE: NO QUESTION Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 2 of 10

C) STALL CONFIGURATION : NO MEASURE CHECKLIST TARGET 1: 100 % of cows fitting in their stall for electric trainer. Based on the measures of the 40 individual cows (length and width) report results from Excel sheet (XXX) in the following table. Attribute a farm score according to the % of cows fitting in their stall for horizontal position and height of electric trainer Nb of cows fitting in their stall Height of electric trainer % FARM SCORE target 2 % fit in horizontal position+% fit in height/2 TARGET 2: 100 % of cows fitting in their stall for lunge space. Based on the measures of the 40 individual cows (length and width) report results from Excel sheet (XXX) in the following table. Attribute a farm score according to the % of cows fitting in the average stall for lunge space Nb of cows fitting in their stall Lunge space (Target 2) % TARGET 3: 100 % of cows fitting in their stall for bed length and width. Based on the measures of the 40 individual cows (length and width) report results from Excel sheet (XXX) in the following table. Attribute a farm score according to the % of cows fitting in their stall for bed length and width Nb of cows fitting in their stall Stall width % Bed length % FARM SCORE target 3 % fit in width+% fit in length/2 TOTAL SCORE TARGET 1 + 2+3 (equal weighting) = TOTAL SCORE TARGET 1 x 33 % + TOTAL SCORE TARGET 2 x 33 % + TOTAL SCORE TARGET 3 x 33 % QUESTIONNAIRE: NO QUESTION Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 3 of 10

1.3 STALL MANAGEMENT : NO MEASURE CHECKLIST A) STALL BASE TYPE B) STALL BEDDING TYPE QUANTITY QUALITY TARGET: Provide deep-bedded dry stalls Based on the questions Q112-113-114-115 in the checklist. Attribute a score to the farm (choose the option that fits the best)*: * Choose the main stall-base type. If 50/50, then choose the most comfortable. Stall base: TYPE Q112 concrete hard rubber mat/dirt Mattress/WATERBED Bedding: QUANTITY Q113-1114 Bedding: QUALITY Q115 FARM SCORE none - Does not meet requirement 0 (0%) wet/very Meets requirements BUT not recommendations little wet 1 (33 %) dry Meets requirements BUT not recommendations 1 (33 %) deep wet/very wet Meets requirements AND some recommendations 2 (66 %) dry Meets requirements AND recommendations 3 (100 %) none - Does not meet requirement 0 (0%) wet/very Meets requirements BUT not recommendations little wet 1 (33 %) dry Meets requirements BUT not recommendations 1 (33 %) deep wet/very wet Meets requirements AND some recommendations 2 (66 %) dry Meets requirements AND recommendations 3 (100 %) none - Meets requirements BUT not recommendations 1 (33 %) wet/very Meets requirements AND some wet recommendations 2 (66 %) little Meets requirements AND some dry recommendations 2 (66 %) deep wet/very wet Meets requirements AND some recommendations 2 (66 %) dry Meets requirements AND recommendations 3 (100 %) QUESTIONNAIRE: NO QUESTION Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 4 of 10

C) STALL/BEDDING MANAGEMENT TARGET 1: Cows must be kept in an environment with a low level of contamination (1) evaluation of cow cleanliness. N.B.: Cow cleanliness reflects the level of contamination of the environment. Udder and upper leg-flank cleanliness reflects cleanliness of bedding and stall. Lower leg cleanliness reflects cleanliness of walking areas. Measure on each of the 40 focal cows the level of cleanliness for upper leg-flank, udder and lower leg. Attribute a farm score according to the % of cows with score 0-1 for all 3 body parts Level of cleanliness 0 (clean) 1 (light contamination) 2 (heavy contamination) 3 (very heavy contamination) FARM SCORE Target 1 Upper leg-flank % % % % % of score 0-1 Udder % % % % % of score 0-1 Lower leg % % % % % of score 0-1 FARM SCORE Target 1= sum/3 CHECKLIST TARGET 2: Cows must be kept in an environment with a low level of contamination (2) evaluation of stall cleanliness. Based on the questions Q116 in the checklist. Stall cleanliness FARM SCORE Target 2 Meets TARGET : all stalls scored A or B 2 (100%) Almost meets TARGET : all stalls scored A, B or C 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET : some stalls scored D or E 0 (0%) QUESTIONNAIRE TARGET 3: Stalls must be cleaned at every milking. Based on the questions Q2 in the questionnaire. Stall raked out and patties removal FARM SCORE Target 3 Meets TARGET and recommendations : A 2 (100%) Meets TARGET : B 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET : C or D 0 (0%) Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 5 of 10

TARGET 4: Stalls must be routinely bedded. Based on the questions Q3 in the questionnaire. Adding new bedding FARM SCORE Target 4 Meets TARGET: A or B 2 (100%) Almost meets TARGET : C 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET : D 0 (0%) TOTAL SCORE TARGET 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 (equal weighting) = FARM SCORE TARGET 1 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 2 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 3 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 4 x 25 % Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 6 of 10

SECTION 2 FEED AND WATER 2.1 BODY CONDITION SCORING TARGET: no cows should be at a BCS of 2 or lower Measure BCS on each of the 40 focal cows. Attribute a farm score according to the number of cows with BCS 2. Milking and holding time Meets TARGET : 0/40 cows with BCS 2 Almost meets TARGET : 2/40 cows with BCS 2 (within 5 %) Does not meet TARGET : More than 2/40 cows with BCS 2 (below 5 %) FARM SCORE 2 (100%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) CHEKLIST: NO MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE: NO QUESTION Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 7 of 10

2.2. NUTRITION AND FEED MANAGEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE+ CHEKLIST TARGET 1: Provide feed to the cow daily Based on the questions Q9 in the questionnaire. Fresh feed Q9 FARM SCORE target 1 Exceeds TARGET 1: A 2 (100%) Meets TARGET 1: B 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET 1: C 0 (0%) TARGET 2: Keep a consistent feeding schedule Based on the questions Q10 (TMR) or Q12 (no TMR) in the questionnaire. Fresh feed Q10 Q12 FARM SCORE target 2 Meets TARGET 2: consistent schedule A, B or C Producer provided a schedule Does not meet TARGET 2 : inconsistent schedule D Producer did not provide a schedule 1 (100 %) 0 (0 %) TARGET 3: Ensure continuous access to feed Based on the questions Q11 (TMR) or Q12 (no TMR) in the questionnaire and Q128 in checklist. Push-up routine Q11 Q12 FARM SCORE Q12 Meets TARGET 3: A 2 forages or more 2 (100 %) Almost meet TARGET 3: B 1 forage + 1 concentrate delivered at 2 different time Does not meet TARGET 3 : C or D 1 forage + 1 concentrate deliver at the same time 1 (50 %) 0 (0%) Estimate continuous feed access Q128 FARM SCORE Q128 Meets TARGET 3: 4 x A 2 (100%) Almost meet TARGET 3: 3 x A 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET 3 : 2 x A and less 0 (0%) Continuous feed access Q11/12 + Q128 FARM SCORE target 3 = FARM SCORE Q11/Q12 + Q128/2 Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 8 of 10

SECTION 3 HEALTH AND WELFARE MANAGEMENT 3.1 LAMENESS TARGET 1: Less than 10 % of obvious or severe lame cows Measure gait score on each of the 40 focal cows. Attribute a farm score according to the number of cows with gait score for obviously/severely lame. Prevalence lameness FARM SCORE target 1 Exceeds TARGET 1: < 5 % obviously/severely lame 2/40 cows or less Meets TARGET 1 : 6-10 % obviously/severely lame 3/40 cows Almost meets TARGET 1: 11-15 % obviously/severely lame 4-6/40 cows Does not meet TARGET 1: > 15 % obviously/severely lame More than 6/40 cows 3 (100%) 2 (66%) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) QUESTIONNAIRE TARGET 2: Routinely observe cows for lameness Based on the questions Q25 in the questionnaire. Observe for lame cows Q25 FARM SCORE target 2 Meets TARGET 2 B or C 2 (100 %) Almost meet TARGET 2: D 1 (50 %) Does not meet TARGET 2 A or E 0 (0%) TARGET 3: Proper procedure to treat lame cows Based on the questions Q29 in the questionnaire. Treat lame cows Q29 FARM SCORE target 3 Meets TARGET 3 A or B 2 (100 %) Almost meet TARGET 3 C 1 (50 %) Does not meet TARGET 3 D or E 0 (0%) Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 9 of 10

TARGET 4: Keep complete record of lameness Based on the questions Q28 in the questionnaire. Record lameness Q28 FARM SCORE target 4 Meets TARGET 4 A, B or C 2 (100%) Almost meet TARGET 4 D 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET 4 E 0 (0%) TOTAL SCORE TARGET 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 (equal weighting) = FARM SCORE TARGET 1 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 2 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 3 x 25 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 4 x 25 % 3.2 CLAW HEALTH/HOOF-TRIMMING QUESTIONNAIRE TARGET 1: Trim claw approximately two months before calving to prevent and minimize lameness after calving Based on the questions Q35 in the questionnaire. Hoof-trimming procedure Q35 FARM SCORE target 1 Meets TARGET 1 B or C 2 (100%) Almost meet TARGET 1 A 1 (50%) Does not meet TARGET 1 D or E 0 (0%) TARGET 2: Keep complete record of hoof-trimming Based on the questions Q39 in the questionnaire. Record hoof-trimming Q39 FARM SCORE target 2 Meets TARGET 1 A 1 (100%) Does not meet TARGET 1 B 0 (0%) TOTAL SCORE TARGET 1 + 2 (equal weighting) = FARM SCORE TARGET 1 x 50 % + FARM SCORE TARGET 2 x 50 % SECTION 4 CALVING (No target) SECTION 5 CODE OF PRACTICES (No target) Cow welfare assessment - SCORING (Compilation) - TS 14Mar2011 Page 10 of 10