BIOSECURITY ON DAIRIES... ARE WE DOING ENOUGH?

Similar documents
Ren Tip # 84 11/6/15

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Gross Pathology. Johne s disease. Johne s Disease: The ostrich approach just isn t working! The result: Damaged intestine

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

DAIRY HERD INFORMATION FORM

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Practical and Sensible Dairy Farm Biosecurity

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

NYS Cattle Health Assurance Program. Expansion Module Background and Best Management Practices

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

May Why is Participation in Johne s Disease Testing Programs so Low, and is it Important to Increase Johne s Surveillance in the Dairy Industry?

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

NYSCHAP BASELINE SURVEY Cover Page

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

Comingling: A Herd Health Time Bomb?

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Dairy Calf, BVDv-PI Dead & Chronic Monitoring Program

Johne s Disease Control

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Eradication of Johne's disease from a heavily infected herd in 12 months

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

DAIRY VETERINARY NEWSLETTER

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Biosecurity for Dairy Farms: Biosecurity for Dairy Farms: Controlling Access

Canada s Dairy Industry: Surveillance Challenges and Opportunities

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Simple Herd Level BVDV Eradication for Dairy

Control of Salmonella in Swedish cattle herds

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

CONTENTS. FACT SHEET 1: BVD Monitoring & Vaccination in Suckler Herds. FACT SHEET 2: BVD Monitoring & Vaccination - Selling Bulling Heifers

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

Break Free from BVD. What is BVD? BVD outbreak in 2013/ cow dairy herd in Staffordshire. Costs Calculation Costs*

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Multi-state MDR Salmonella Heidelberg outbreak associated with dairy calf exposure

What is Dairy Production Medicine?

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Reference Manual & Workbook JULY 2018

NATURAL BVD VACCINATION THE WAY TO GO?

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Beef Cattle Herd Health Workshop # 10

Bulk Milk Data and Udder Health

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

Perspectives on Biosecurity for Canadian Dairy Farms and AI Studs

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD)

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

Take Control. Prevent BVDV Associated Production Losses

NMR HERDWISE JOHNE S SCREENING PROGRAMME

Manual & Workbook MARCH 2018

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Barry County 4-H Senior Dairy Project Record Book Ages 15-19

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Rearing heifers to calve at 24 months

DF-AH-001v3 revised January 2015 Page 1 of 6

Pennsylvania Premier Bred Heifer Program

Dry Cow Vaccination. Maternity Pen. Timing. Colostrum Absorption. Failure of Passive Transfer

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Biocontainment. Within populations. The Sandhills Calving System. Actions to prevent the spread of infectious agents.

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

Johne s Disease. for Goat Owners

The Environment And Mastitis Control. What If the USA Lost the War in Iraq??? Dr. Andy Johnson. Western Canadian Dairy Conference Red Deer, Alberta

Mastitis Reports in Dairy Comp 305

Charmany Dairy Herd Newsletter Oct. 29 th Nov. 4 th Daily Events

Johnes Disease Version March 2015

MASTITIS, ANTIBIOTICS, AND RESISTANCE: A ROUND- TABLE DISCUSSION WITH DR. ROB TREMBLAY

a commitment to milk quality

Cattle keepers guide to safeguarding health

Johne s Disease Q&A. for Sheep Owners

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Goal 1: Harvest the Highest Quality Product

proaction in Ontario Created by Drs. Steven Roche & Kelly Barratt

Dairy Herd Reproductive Records

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

WYOMING PREMIUM HEIFER PROGRAM

NEW ZEALAND DAIRY INDUSTRY AND COLOSTRUM

The VCPR and What Makes it Valid

Epidemiology - Animal Tracing Exercise. Gregory Ramos DVM, MPVM Area Epidemiology Officer USDA/APHIS/VS

Protecting your herd s future

Alabama Beef Cattle Improvement Association 40 County Road 756 Clanton, AL

VVI website 4/11/2012. The Role of Veterinarians in a Changing Dairy industry. Chris King, dvm. Chris King, dvm

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Transcription:

BIOSECURITY ON DAIRIES... ARE WE DOING ENOUGH? Mike Collins, DVM, PhD School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin BIOSECURITY: EFFORTS TO CONTROL SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES There are three levels of biosecurity: 1) efforts to keep infectious diseases not present in the USA, like Foot-and-Mount disease, out of our country, 2) efforts to keep infectious diseases not present on some farms from entering those farms, and 3) efforts to control infectious diseases that have become established in dairy. This presentation will only deal with the last two levels of biosecurity, those that producers have under their direct control. Dairy in the USA can be kept free of many infectious diseases that we consider endemic (present everywhere) in our country by following some simple common sense practices. Examples of these diseases include: Strep. ag. mastitis Mycoplasma mastitis Johne s disease Salmonella dublin Salmonella DT104 - multi-drug resistant Heel warts BVD (type 2 and PI animals) Recent events in California demonstrate that even diseased we think we have eradicated from the USA like tuberculosis can be brought into. Bankers are the #1 cause of the spread of infectious diseases of dairy cattle in the USA today (yes, you can quote me on this). Failure to look at the long-term investment forces many bad decisions when are expanding. Typically, bankers will advice their clients to fill the barn with cattle as soon as the concrete is dry. This leaves little room for being selective about purchased cattle and inevitably results in buying cattle infected with a variety of pathogens that then spread disease to the rest of the herd. For the next 10 years or more farm profitability is compromised as owners pay for veterinary services to treat and control the problems brought about by this short-sighted approach to cattle purchasing. A small investment in pre-purchase testing can avoid these train wrecks. Its an old but still very true adage: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure - but the dairy industry can t seem to learn this lesson even though the swine and poultry industries learned long ago that total exclusion of pathogens from farms is by far the most cost- Fact: 71% of dairy sold in New York and Pennsylvania from January 1998 to June 1999 had at least one cow infected with Strep ag. or Mycoplasma mastitis. Dairy Herd Management, December 1999.

effective way to manage many infectious diseases. There are numerous examples in the literature documenting the significant risks of buying cattle and the cost-effectiveness of programs to limit this risk. Your veterinarian should be part of the team planning any expansion and specifically be responsible for a sound biosecurity plan. MASTITIS EXAMPLE: STRATEGIES TO LIMIT THE CHANCES OF BUYING INFECTIOUS MASTITIS Prepurchase exam on the herd of origin: 1 - Bulk tank culture for Streptococcus agalactiae Staphylococcus aureus Corynebacterium bovis Mycoplasma bovis 2 - Request last 6-12 months of bulk tank SCC data 3 - Request last 6-12 months of bulk tank bacteria counts (SPC): not for mastitis pathogens, instead for general quality of herd management; avoid with high counts or upward trend. 4 - Request last 6-12 months of records for clinical mastitis: ask yourself, is it the same or higher than in my own herd? 5 - For smaller numbers of cows, get SCC history and culture all four quarter for mastitis pathogens. These procedures will reduce risk but not guarantee 100% that no infected cattle are purchased. So, a sound on-farm biosecurity program is also needed. After purchase: 1 - house separately - separate milking group - or milk last. 2 - culture quarter milk samples 3 - assume that every purchased cow has been treated with antibiotics. Do not put her milk into the bulk tank until she has been tested and proven antibiotic-free. To test or not to test?...from Dairy Today, October 1999. Following are two actual New York. Herd A did no mastitis screening of animals prior to purchase. Herd B screened all cows by culture. Data provided by Dave Wilson, 1999 NMC Regional Meeting Proceedings. Herd A 375 lactating cows; bought 110 cows Prior SCC; 350,000 to 400,000 SCC two months after purchase: 670,000 49 cows found positive for Strep. ag. Costs: Lab costs (2,300 cultures) $6,626 Lost milk (150 cows x 4.5 days x 60lb/cow) $5,265 Culls (24 cows @ $860 each)$20,640 Drug costs (150 @ $14/box) $2,100 Premium losses ($0.25/cwt x 225 cwt/day x 240 days)$13,500 Total $48,131 Herd B 150 lactating cows: bought 450 cows Prior SCC; 120,000 to 180,000 Screened all cows by culture 600 cows total after 13 months SCC unchanged Costs: Lab costs (514 cultures)$1,465 Culling (7 culls @ $860)$6,020 (no drugs, premium loss or culls due to contagious mastitis) Total $7,485 Not only should you limit introduction of infectious disease for the sake of you herd, some of these bad bugs are also zoonotic - capable of infecting you, your family and your employees. Salmonella is the most notorious example.

Similar pre-purchase testing programs are recommended for Johne s disease, BVD, Salmonella and other infectious diseases. The concepts are the same only the specific testing strategies and techniques differ. There is not time in the program nor space in these meeting proceedings to detail them here, so consult your veterinarian. JOHNE S DISEASE A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE OF HOW TO IMPLEMENT A BIOSECURITY PROGRAM Prevalence - it s wide spread Johne s disease has gone from a disease nonexistent in the USA (prior to 1908) to one that affects well over half of US dairy. It is an epidemic, even though it may not seem like it because of the slow insidious way it spreads. The 1996 USDA survey of dairy showed that over 40% of large (more than 300 cows) had Johne s disease. Consolidation of the dairy industry leads to larger, causing more cattle purchasing, and, since few producers make any attempt to limit the chances of buying Johne s disease, more with Johne s disease. The rest of this article outlines specific, affordable strategies to limit spread fo Johne s disease among and within farms. Latin legalese: Caveat emptor English translation: Buyer beware True meaning: Don t be a sucker - there is a reason that cow is being sold Every purchased animal is a threat to the health of the herd. Strategies to avoid buying Johne s disease The best way. Buy from in an official herd status program. Many states are adopting programs modeled after the U.S. Voluntary Bovine Johne s Disease herd Status Program. These are graded from 1 (lowest level of safety) to 4 (highest level of safety). Any cow or heifer raised in these, whether tested before purchase or not, has a low risk of being infected. Wisconsin uses this system and also grades the infected A = no test-positive cows B = less than 5% test-positive cows C = 5-15% test-positive cows D = over 15% test-positive cows Untested as maximum risk for Johne s disease...and they are. Tested and classified are becoming easier to find. As of January 1, 2002 Wisconsin had 176 at the A level.

Minnesota reports the following numbers of by VJDHSP (national program) status level. (as of September 12, 2002). Status level Beef Dairy Total 1 5 9 14 2 5 22 27 3 3 9 12 4 3 12 15 Total 16 52 68 Buying replacement cattle from that at A or levels 1-4 in the VJDHSP is good insurance against buying Johne s disease. As these programs gain momentum, stimulated by investment of states, such are becoming easier to find every day. The second best way. Buy only from a limited number of and require that at least 30 adult cattle (2 nd lactation or older) from the source herd test-negative for Johne s disease (by ELISA - blood test). By this criterion, the source herd qualifies as a level 1 in the VJDHSP. You do NOT need to test the heifers you may buy from such a herd. The test is more meaningful when used on adults. It is not a guarantee that the source herd is not infected but your risk of buying Johne s disease is much much lower than when buying from random sources of untested. AFFORDABLE STRATEGIES FOR CONTROLLING JOHNE S DISEASE ONCE IT IS IN YOUR HERD First and most important. Follow best management practices for calf rearing. That means: 1. Have written procedures for maternity pens and calf rearing, called Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that everyone on the farm reads and follows. 2. Maternity pens must NOT be located near sick cow pens. 3. Cows that test-positive for Johne s disease should calve in a separate pen. 4. Remove the calf from the cow within an hour. 5. Feed the calf 4 quarts (3 qts. for smaller breeds like Jerseys) of colostrum collected from a single Johne s disease test-negative cow within 12 hours of birth. 6. Feed calves ONLY pasteurized milk up to weaning. This can be bought as milk replacer or pasteurized on-farm with commercially available systems. 7. Practice good sanitation for feeding and watering heifers.

A Johne s disease testing program helps accelerate Johne s disease control but can not replace good management. 1. Test all cows at the end of lactation using the ELISA blood test. 2. Label all cows with suspect or positive results. Attachments to ear tags or leg bands are working well in many. These cow are high-risk cows and everyone on the farm can readily identify them. These are the cows that must calve in a separate maternity pen and not be used as colostrum donors. 3. The testing and labeling program will cause a shortage of colostrum. This can be solved either by collecting and banking excess high quality colostrum, or buy use of colostrum replacement products such as Acquire. 4. Cull all cows that are classified as strong-positive by ELISA before they calve. These cows are in the terminal stages of infection, will not survive another lactation, are highly infectious and shedding enormous numbers of M. paratuberculosis (the cause of Johne s disease ) in their manure, colostrum and milk. Note: be sure you test cows as they approach the end of lactation so that test results are in hand BEFORE dry-cow mastitis treatments are used. In this way you save money and are not forced to hold the strongpositive cows waiting for drug withdrawal time to pass. FINANCIAL SUPPORT There is financial support for Johne s disease testing in Minnesota and Wisconsin. The specifics of these programs change from year to year so website references are provided where you can get the latest information about the programs and people to contact. Minnesota http://www.bah.state.mn.us/cattle/johne's/johnes_program.htm Wisconsin http://datcp.state.wi.us/ah/agriculture/animals/disease/johnes/reimburse.html SUMMARY If you do not like paying vet bills, avoid buying sick cattle - you DO have a choice. The methods for avoiding sick cattle are simple, logical, affordable and proven cost-effective. REFERENCES For additional information, pictures, website links, and even mini-lectures on Johne s disease visit the Johne s Information Center: http://johnes.org