IMPACT OF INTERNAL PARASITES ON BEEF CATTLE 1

Similar documents
Large Animal Topics in Parasitology for the Veterinary Technician Jason Roberts, DVM This presentation is designed to review the value veterinary

"BOVINE PARASITISM" Recent Issues and Strategies for Parasite Control in Grazing Cattle. Donald H. Bliss, Ph.D. Veterinary Parasitologist VERONA, WI

INTERNAL PARASITES OF SHEEP AND GOATS

REEDY FORK DAIRY FARM

Ecology/Physiology Workgroup. Nematode Parasites and Grazing Research

Control of Helminth Parasites in Cow Calf Operations in the Southern United States

The Effect of Anthelmintic Treatment in Adult Dairy Cows on Milk Production

Parasite control in beef and dairy cattle

Parasite Prevention Strategies for Bison.

Parasite Control on Organic Sheep Farms in Ontario

Ecology/Physiology Workgroup. Importance of Nematode Parasites in Cattle Grazing Research

Reedy Fork Dairy Farm Parasitology Report Fall 2016

Parasites in Sheep Flocks

Economic Significance of Fasciola Hepatica Infestation of Beef Cattle a Definition Study based on Field Trial and Grazier Questionnaire

Parasite Management for Small Ruminants

Treatment Strategies to control Parasitic Roundworms In Cattle

HUSK, LUNGWORMS AND CATTLE

Effects of Late-Summer Protein Supplementation and Deworming on Performance of Beef Calves Grazing Native Range

Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle what are the levels and what can be done to lessen its impact?

THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF NEMATODE INFECTIONS IN CATTLE I.K. HOTSON* Summary

Characterization of Haemonchus contortus

LAMB GROWTH AND EWE PRODUCTION FOLLOWING ANTHELMINTIC DRENCHING BEFORE AND AFTER LAMBING

Best Management Practices: Internal Parasite control in Louisiana Beef Cattle

Sheep CRC Conference Proceedings

Stalled Calves Strongyle- type eggs per gram Other parasites

Cattle and Swine Parasites

ECONOMICS OF DEWORMING BEEF CATTLE & HERD MONITORING WITH FECAL EGG COUNTS

MidAmerica Ag Research

Internal parasites in beef cattle. SBIC 2017 Fabienne Uehlinger

Gastrointestinal Nematode Infestations in Sheep

Efficacies of fenbendazole and albendazole in the treatment of commercial turkeys artificially infected with Ascaridia dissimilis

PARASITOLOGY IN 2020 Where will we stand? EU Framework Programmes PARASOL & GLOWORM & PARAVAC

A Field Study on Efficacy of Albendazole (Albezol ) Against Gastro-intestinal Nematodes in Ruminants

Deworming: Relationships, Resistance, Refugia

"Our aim is to improve the health and productivity of livestock through evidence based collaborative research, knowledge and experience"

Therapeutic efficacy of a mixture of ivermectin and closantel against gastrointestinal parasites in draft horses

For Beef Cattle, Dairy Cattle and Deer. For the control & treatment of internal and external parasites in cattle and deer

Diagnosis, treatment and control: dealing with coccidiosis in cattle

NADIS Parasite Forecast November 2017 Use of meteorological data to predict the prevalence of parasitic diseases

Order Strongylida. Superfamilies: Trichostrongyloidea Strongyloidea Metastrongyloidea Ancylostomatoidea (hookworms)


Managing Internal Parasites in Small Ruminants. Dan Macon UC Cooperative Extension September 14, 2018

Internal Parasite Control for Meat Goats

Evaluation of Horn Flies and Internal Parasites with Growing Beef Cattle Grazing Bermudagrass Pastures Findings Materials and Methods Introduction

Detection of Gastrointestinal Helminthic and Protozoan Infections in Diarrhoeic Goats

Suckler cow management. Dai Grove-White.

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

FDA S ANTIPARASITIC RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (ARMS)

Check that milk is suitable to go in the vat

Presence of Parasite Larvae in Goat Manure for Use as Fertiliser

Johne s Disease Control

Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD)

Control of Internal Parasites in Sheep

Tri County Dairy Goat News Volume III, Issue 1 May 2006

FAMACHA for Parasite Control

Calf Mortality in Cow Herds

Prevalence of Liver Fluke in Sheep and Goat Slaughtered at Abattoirs in Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria

UPDATE ON ANTHELMINTIC RESISTANCE IN GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODE PARASITES OF CATTLE: HOW DOES THIS CHANGE OPTIMAL APPROACHES TO CONTROL?

GET YOUR CATTLE PERFORMANCE READY WITH MULTIMIN IMPROVING FERTILITY IN BEEF CATTLE

Table1. Target lamb pre-weaning daily live weight gain from grazed pasture

Dictyocaulus viviparus lungworm

Prevalence of gastro-intestinal strongyles in native beef cattle under small holder management condition in Udon Thani, Thailand

Developing parasite control strategies in organic systems

EBA Series FOOTHILL ABORTION UPDATE: PART I: THE TICK

Parasites of the Bison

Farm Newsletter - February 2017

Holistic Approach to Animal Health and Well-Being

Parasite Management for Small Ruminants

Prevalence of Gastro-Intestinal Parasites of Dairy Cows in Thailand

Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in a Naturally Infected Ontario Cow-Calf Herd: Efficacy of Fenbendazole and Ivermectin

The current state of anthelmintic resistance in the UK and simple messages to slow the progression

Sustainable worm control strategies for cattle

Fasciolosis caused by Fasciola hepatica an increasing concern

MOREDUN FOUNDATION (ADRA) NEWS SHEETS VOLUME 1 (NUMBERS 1-30) BOOK PRICE PLUS 1.00 P&P OR 5.00 PER NEWS SHEET

AARJMD VOLUME 1 ISSUE 19 (MARCH 2014) ISSN : A Peer Reviewed International Journal of Asian Academic Research Associates AARJMD

MAJOR INTERNAL PARASITES AFFECTING HORSES AND OTHER EQUIDS

Duddingtonia flagrans What is it?

Internal Roundworm Parasites of Beef Cattle and their Control: A Canadian perspective

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION SUMMARY

HOOKWORM FAQ SHEET (rev ) Adapted from the CDC Fact Sheet

Health plans and fluke and worm control

The Socio-Economic Impact of Fascioliasis Disease in Nandi Central District, Kenya

Emergency preparedness PICs and Annual Returns

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTS CHARACTERISTICS

Diagnosis and classification of Eimeria species in cattle in Mosul

Sustainable Worm Control Strategies for Sheep. LSSC Ltd

Parasites of the Bison

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

Prevalence of some parasitic helminths among slaughtered ruminants in Kirkuk slaughter house, Kirkuk, Iraq

Introducing the latest in worming technology...

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

EC Prevent Worms...to Increase Sheep Profits

Understanding the Lifecycle of the Hydatid Tapeworm

We have two basic regimens for keeping the parasites in and on your horse to a minimum:

Sustainable Integrated Parasite Management (sipm)

What s Hiding in your Pet?

Saskatchewan Sheep Opportunity

TOC INDEX. Giardiasis and Cryptosporidiosis. M. E. Olson. Take Home Message. Giardia and Cryptosporidium Species

Johnston County 4-H Heifer Project Guide

Summary of Product Characteristics

Transcription:

IMPACT OF INTERNAL PARASITES ON BEEF CATTLE 1 Thomas M. Craig Texas A&M University ~ College Station 77843 ABSTRACT Internal parasitism is a pervasive constant that reduces returns in beef cattle production. Parasitism may influence production sufficiently so that data derived investigating performance response will be erroneous. The interaction of internal parasites of cattle with other facets of their lives makes it imperative that more parasite research be done on cattle to consider their impact. Results of trials designed to determine forage production at various stocking densities may not reflect the nutritive value of the forage, but instead the severity of parasite exposure. Relative resistance or susceptibility to certain parasites vary with the breed of livestock and the species of parasite. Extensive work to evaluate the ability of various breeds and sires to influence parasitic numbers has been conducted in sheep but not in catde. Some parasite trials have ignored the effects of nutrition on the establishment and retention of parasites. This becomes especially important where multiple parasite exposure may occur. Susceptible cattle, even on an optimal diet, will become parasitized, but if reexposed to the same species of parasite, cattle on an optimal diet may be able to resist reinfection, whereas those on deficient diets will not. (Key Words: Beef Cattle, Parasites, Pasture Management.) I ntroduction Internal parasitism in cattle can be divided into three categories with regard to the parasites' effect on the host: infection, economic and clinical. Infection is the presence of parasites within cattle, but because of the numbers and(or) species composition of parasites there are no demonstrable adverse effects. Infection is universal and is manifested as a constant equilibrium between host and parasite. Economic parasitism is the level of infection that prevents the host from reaching its genetic potential in the production of meat, milk or other measureable criteria. Economic parasitism is widespread, seasonal and often affected by other factors including quality and abundance of feed, stocking rate, age, sex, breed or acquired resistance. Clinical parasitism occurs when an imbalance exists between host and parasite to the extent that overt disease is detected. This Presented at the symposium "Economic Impact of Internal Parasites on Food Animal Production," 79th Annu. Mtg. of Am. Soc. Anita. Sci., Utah State Univ., Logan, July 30, 1987. 2 College of Vet. Med. Received October 5, 1987. Accepted January 28, 1988. may be manifested as anemia, diarrhea, poor growth rate, anorexia or other departures for a physiologically normal state. Clinical parasitism usually can be anticipated by an experienced husbandman, and treatment or control measures can be implemented. Of the three categories, economic parasitism is the most difficult to assess because of the many factors that may be involved. One common way of assessing economic parasitism is by the administration of an anthelmintic to cattle and then, after a predetermined period of time, comparing weight gains between treated and untreated control animals (Table 1). This is a valid method of determining anthelmintic effects, but it may not always assess the true effects of parasitism. If sufficient time elapses between treatment and evaluation, reinfection may have occurred such that both groups have similar numbers of parasites. Conversely, if the cattle are not reexposed to parasites (such as in a feedlot), natural attrition may decrease parasite numbers and the effects of compensatory growth may negate any differences occurring shortly after treatment (Nansen, 1987). The greatest problem encountered in pasture studies involving cattle is determining whether or not to graze the treated and untreated cattle in separate but "comparable" pastures or to allow treated catde to graze pastures being 1565 J. Anim. Sci. 1988. 66:1565-1569

1566 CRAIG TABLE 1. REDUCED LIVEWEIGHT GAINS CAUSED BY ECONOMIC HELM1NTH INFECTIONS IN YOUNG CATTLE Observation % Reduction in Comparison period, mo weight gain Reference Untreated vs 4 treatments 7 22 Untreated vs 5 treatments Contaminated vs clean pasture Metaeercaria vs uninfected Untreated vs suppressive treatment Metacercaria vs uninfected Untreated vs suppressive treatment Untreated vs 1 treatment Untreated vs monthly treatments Untreated vs sustained release 11 18 5 24 6 29 12 33 7 14 16 24 3.5 17 2.5 26 4 13 5 15 5 23 11 16 Cairns and Gallagher, as cited by Barger (1982) Brunsdon, as cited by Barger (1982) Helle and Tharaldsen, as cited by Barger (1982) Hope-Cawdery et al. (1977) Morley et al., as cited by Barger (1982) Chick et al. (1980) Hutchinson et al., as cited by Barger (1982) Ciordia et al. (1984) Ryan and Guerrero (1987) Isles et al. (1985) Craig et al. (1982) Herd et al. (1985) Tolling et al. (1981) contaminated with parasites by the untreated controls. These are mutually exclusive factors, and no satisfactory solution has been proposed that will address both the nutritional differences between pastures and parasite exposure between groups of cattle. Generally, young grazing cattle are the most adversely affected, carry heavier burdens of parasites, and are the primary source of contamination to the pasture (Dunn, 1978). Clinical parasitic disease may be seen in dairy replacement heifers or stocker calves that are intensively grazed, whereas single-suckled beef calves seldom exhibit clinical signs of parasitic infections. One reason for this difference is that most of the larval worms ingested by mother cows fail to establish because of her acquired resistance, so the contamination of the pasture is considerably reduced (Dunn, 1978; Overend et al., 1984; Soulsby, 1985; Nansen, 1987). In addition, the nursing calf has the advantage of high-quality nutrition provided by its dam. Therefore, control programs should be targeted either directly at calves or at the pastures they will occupy. In some instances, cows occupying the pasture prior to calving or during early lactation will contribute to pasture contamination due to a periparturient rise in egg count (Hammerberg and Lamm, 1980). However, most parasite larvae are present in the pasture due to shedding by young cattle (Eysker and Van Meus, 1982; Overend et al., 1984). There are four important types of internal parasites of cattle: gastrointestinal nematodes, lungworms, liver flukes and coccidia. Other internal parasites such as tapeworms only rarely are important in the U.S., but they may cause condemnation or necessitate special handling of carcasses, as in the case of Taenia saginata, the human beef tapeworm. Gastrointestinal Nematodes and Lungworms Gastrointestinal nematodes and lungworms have similar environmental requirements. The bionomics of the free-living stages of parasites are important to the survival and transmission of parasitic nematodes. Development from the egg to the infective stage is temperature- and humidity-dependent (Dunn, 1978). Development of the embryo within the egg, hatching of the larvae, feeding and molting two times may occur in as little as a week during the summer, but this process may be delayed for a month or longer during the winter. During the developmental stages the larave are very susceptible to

INTERNAL PARASITES IN BEEF CATTLE 1567 desiccation, and the longer the development time, the lower the survival. However, after larvae have reached the infective stage, they become relatively resistant to drying and cold and will survive as long as energy stored during the earlier larval stages remains available. Energy is expended in a temperature-dependent fashion. After the energy stores are depleted, the larvae die. Hence, larvae that were deposited as eggs in the autumn will survive the winter and be available to grazing cattle the following spring. If larvae do not infect a host, they are unlikely to survive the summer. Rotational grazing systems are unlikely to give sufficient rest to a pasture to allow a meaningful number of larvae to die before regrazing. The adverse effects caused by the presence of the parasite vary depending on the species of parasites involved. In some cases the most severe damage is caused by the immature stages, rather than by the adult worm. Thus, cattle can exhibit clinical signs of parasitism while having few or no parasite eggs in their feces. Some nematode species do not cause economic loss unless they are present in tremendous numbers, whereas others in comparatively low numbers may cause disease. The species of parasites present in a given area is determined by climate. Irrigation or other agricultural systems may change the microclimate of the parasitic larvae's environment. This may enable a parasite to survive in an area where otherwise it would die. As climate determines where a parasite is found, weather determines when the parasite will be transmitted. The free-riving, ensheathed, infective larvae need moisture to leave the dung pad and ascend the herbage. Once they are free of the dung pad and on herbage, their sheath protects them from desiccation and, unless the environment becomes extremely dry, they survive. There is little evidence that larvae ascend and descend the herbage in a regular pattern. They move with moisture and may be trapped in leaf nodes or elsewhere on the plant, where they remain until ingested by the host. Each species of parasite has its own niche within the host and requirements for survival outside of the host. Unless this is considered, control programs are unlikely to be effective against the primary pathogens. The most important species of internal parasite of cattle in temperate regions of the world is Ostertagia ostertagi. This extremely adaptable parasite has evolved in different regions of the world to enable it to survive the most adverse weather conditions. It avoides unfavorable weather conditions by undergoing arrested development (a phenomenon akin to diapause in insects; Armour, 1970). For instance, where hot, dry summer conditions are the most devastating period for survival of larvae, as in Texas and Louisiana, development of the parasite is arrested during this period (Craig, 1979; Williams et al., 1983). Conversely, in areas where the cattle are housed during the winter because of snow and lack of forage in the pasture (e. g., Maine), parasite development is arrested during the winter (Gibbs, 1979). Because the larvae within the cattle are metabolically inactive during arrested development, little if any damage is done to the abomasum of the host. Cattle may accumulate massive numbers of arrested larvae within their abomasa with no signs of disease. However, when larvae resume development (during the period of time usually most favorable to the parasite), clinical disease will be evident. While in the arrested state, the worms are not producing eggs, imbibing blood or engaged in other activities to make their presence known. Hence, cattle considered to be unparasitized in fact may host hundreds of thousands of larvae. The clinical disease thus may be seen in situations where the cattle could not have possible have become infected by larvae, such as in a feedlot. Even if numbers of parasites are insufficient to cause clinical disease, economic parasitism may influence production (Schillhorn van Veen and Metancon, 1984). The damage caused by parasites varies considerably with the species of parasite present, the resistance and resilience of the host, and the quality and quantity of feed available (Goldberg, 1965; Chalmers, 1980; Holmes, 1985). The presence of some nematodes such as Ostertagia or Tricbostrongylus will reduce feed intake by the host. Although the reason for this inappetance is not fully understood, feed intake may be reduced by up to 20% as compared to nonparasitized livestock (Symons, 1985; Holmes, 1987). There also are changes in gastrointestinal motility, digestion and absorption. The movement of ingesta may be either decreased or increased. Digestive enzymes such as pepsin and brush border enzymes may be depressed so that nutrients are not utilized (Randall and Gibbs, 1981 ; Hammerburg, 1986). Mechanical damage to the gastric mucosa reduces enzyme production and acfiva-

1568 CRAIG tion and may allow macromolecules to pass into the circulation or be lost through the intestinal tract (Murray, 1969). The quality and quantity of meat and milk can be decreased in parasitized catde due to loss of protein (blood, plasma) into the gastrointestinal tract and increased protein metabolism by the intestinal tract. Skeletal changes also can occur due to limited absorption of P caused by intestinal nematodes. Loss of K increases in parasitized calves, which can increase retention of body fluids (Holmes, 1987). Both carcass quantity and quality may be affected by internal parasitism, even following recovery and a feeding period (Enterocasso et al., 1986). Although calves usually are affected most often by internal parasites, clinical and economic disease also may occur in adult cattle (Selman et al., 1976). Some nematodes, such as Dictyocaulus viviparus, the cattle lungworm, cause devastating disease when present in large numbers but appear to be of little significance when present in low to moderate numbers. The lungworm stimulates an early and strong protective immune response in calves. Thus, most singlesuckled beef calves in endemic areas will have established a strong resistance to infection prior to weaning. Lungworms require more moisture for survival and dispersal on pasture than gastrointestinal parasites. If cattle from areas where lungworm is not found are moved into an endemic area and the weather conditions are favorable, parasitic bronchitis may occur; parasitic bronchitis can kill cattle. Liver Flukes Two species of liver fluke occur in cattle in the U.S., Fasciola bepatica, the common liver fluke, and Fascioloides magna, the giant deer fluke. Approximately 1.5 million livers are condemned annually in the U.S. due to these parasites (AAVP, 1983). Other losses in cattle due to the presence of live fluke are difficult to quantitate. Trials conducted under varying conditions indicate vastly different production effects of flukes (Chick et al., 1980; Dargie, 1987). The incidences of anemia, hypoalbuminemia and hyperglobulinemia are markedly increased with fluke infections. Anorexia and increased protein turnover contribute to poorer feed efficiency and slower weight gains in cattle with as few as 54 flukes (Hope-Cawdery et al., 1977). In addition to economic parasitism, liver damage caused by migrating flukes provides a substrate on which bacterial agents such as Clostridium bernolyticum thrive, leading to bacillary hemoglobinuria. Flukes require two hosts in the life cycle, a snail and a final host. Fasciola bepatica may parasitize a number of hosts, but cattle, sheep and goats are the most important economically. The final hosts of F. magna normally are deer, in which the life cycle is completed. However, they often parasitize other ruminants. Only a few F. magna will kill small ruminants; they are economically important in cattle (Foreyt and Todd, 1972, 1976). Coccidia The life cycle of the coccidia, Eirneria spp., is considerably different from that of the helminths in that the free-living infective form of the coccidia is retained within a "cyst" that can occur only on vegetation if carried there by mechanical means. The cyst is quite resistant to the environment and may survive for a year or longer if protected from direct sunlight and desiccation (Hammond, 1973). The cyst is small (10 to 40/ma) and can be transported by wind or rain, but fecal contamination of feed or water is the primary means of spread. As with other parasites, the level of exposure will largely determine the extent of disease, if any. Coccidia stimulate a host immune response. Resistance seems to be of fairly short duration and can be overcome by stress (Niilo, 1970). Coccidiosis is primarily a disease seen in crowded conditions where fecal contamination of feed or water occur readily. It also is a disease of the young when exposed to a particular species of coccidia for the first time. Pathogenic species of Eimeria damage the mucosa, especially of the cecum and colon, causing blood loss and diarrhea. Large areas of epithelium may be sloughed. Most calves will make an uneventful recovery in a few weeks following clinical signs; however, some calves become permanently stunted (Ernst and Benz, 1986). In less than clinical numbers, the economic losses due to coccidia are difficult to ascertain and probably are negligible in most animals. Another condition, Cryptosporidiurn, has received considerable interest in recent years. This organism, associated with a watery diarrhea in young calves, is extremely small and often is overlooked as a pathogen. It is the primary cause of diarrhea in dairy calves that are exposed early in life. After the initial

INTERNAL PARASITES IN BEEF CATTLE 1569 infection, calves apparently are immune to reinfection. However, the organism is zoonotic and may cause diarrheal disease in humans (Fayer and Ungar, 1986). L iteratu re Cited AAVP. 1983. American Association Veterinary Parasitologists. Research needs and priorities for ruminant internal parasites in the United States. Am. J. Vet. Res. 44:1836. Armour, J. 1970. Ostertagiosis: A review. Vet. Rec. 86:184. Barger, I. A. 1982. Helminth parasites and animal production. Biology and control of endoparasites. In: Symons, Donald and Dineen (Ed.) Academic Press, Sydney. p 133. Chalmers, K. 1980. Ostertagiasis survey: summary and discussion. N. Z. Vet. J. 28:27. Chick, B. F., O. R. Cloverdale and A.R.B. Jackson. 1980. Production effects of the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection in beef cattle. Aust. Vet. J. 56:588. Ciordia, H., H. C. McCampbell, G. V. Calvert and R. E. Plue. 1984. Effect of ivermectin on performance of beef cattle on Georgia pastures. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45:2455. Craig, T. M. 1979. Seasonal transmission of bovine gastrointestinal nematodes in the Texas gulf coast. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 174:844. Craig, T. M., J. C. Spitzer, R. Leps and R. K. Fulton. 1982. The effect of anthelmintic treatment on growth of beef heifers on temporary winter pasture. Southwest Vet. 34:195. Dargie, J. D. 1987. The impact on production and mechanisms of pathogens of trematode infections in cattle and sheep. Int. J. Parasitol. 17:453. Dunn, A. M. 1978. Veterinary helminthology, p 323. Wm. Heinemann Medical Books, London. Eysker, M. and G. K. Van Meurs. 1982. Seasonal pattern in the strongyle egg output of adult dairy cows in the Netherlands. Res. Vet. Sci. 33:208. Enterocasso, C. M., J. J. Parkins, J. Armour, K. Bairden and P. N. McWilliam. 1986. Production, parasitological and carcass evaluation studies in steers exposed to trichostrongyle infection and treated with a morantel bolus or fenbendazole in two consecutive grazing seasons. Res. Vet. Sci. 40:76. Ernst, J. V., and G. W. Benz. 1986. Intestinal coccidiosis in cattle. Vet. Clinics North Am. 2 (2):283. Fayer, R., and B.L.P. Ungar. 1986. Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiol. Rev. 50:458. Foreyt, W. J. and A. C. Todd. 1972. The occurrence of Fascioloides magna and Fasciola hepatica together in the livers of naturally infected cattle in South Texas, and the incidence of the flukes in cattle, white-tailed deer, and feral hogs. J. Parasitol. 58:1010. Foreyt, W. J. and A. C. Todd. 1976. Development of the large American liver fluke, Fascioloides magna, in white-tailed deer, cattle and sheep. J. Parasitol. 62 : 26. Gibbs, H. C. 1979. Relative importance of winter survival of larval nematodes in pasture and infected carrier calves in a study of parasitic gastroenteritis in calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 40:227. Goldberg, A. 1965. Relation of feeding level to gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in cattle. J. Parasitol. 51:948. Hammerberg, B. 1986. Pathophysiology of nematodiasis in cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. 2(2):225. Hammerberg, B., and W. D. Lamm. 1980. Changes in periparturient fecal egg counts in beef cows calving in the spring. Am. J. Vet. Res. 41:1686. Hammond, D. M. 1973. Life cycles and development of coccidia. In: Hammond and Long (Ed.) The Coccidia. p 45. University Park Press, Baltimore. Herd, R. P. and L. E. Heider. 1985. Control of nematodes in dairy heifers by prophylactic treatments with albendazole in the spring. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 186:1071. Holmes, P. H. 1985. Pathogenesis of trichostrongylosis. Vet. Parasitol. 18:89. Holmes, P. H. 1987. Pathophysiology of nematode infections. Int. J. Parasitol. 17:443. Hope-Cawdery, M. J., K. L. Strickland, A. Conway and P. J. Crowe. 1977. Production effects of the liver fluke in carrie I. The effects of infection on liveweight gain, feed intake and food conversion efficiency in beef catde. Br. Vet. J. 133:145. Isles, D. H., T. M. Davison, and R. J. Frost. 1985. Influence of frequency of anthelmintic treatment on the growth rate of Australian Friesian Sahiwal heifers. Aust. Vet. J. 62:189. Murray, M. 1969. Structural changes in bovine ostertagiasis associated with increased permeability of the bowell wall to macromolecules Gastroenterology 56:763. Nansen, P. 1987. Production losses and control of helminths in ruminants of temperate regions. Int. J. Parasitol. 17:425. Niilo, L. 1970. Experimental winter coccidiosis in sheltered and unsheltered calves. Can. J. Comp. Med. 34:20. Overend, D., P. I. Veale and J. W. Copland. 1984. An epidemiological study of trichostrongylidiasis in dairy cattle grazing irrigated pastures. Aust. Vet. J. 61:169. Randall, R. W. and H. C. Gibbs. 1981. Effects of clinical and subclinical gastrointestinal helminthiasis on digestion and energy metabolism in calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 42:1730. Ryan, W. G. and J. Guerrero. 1987. Effect of ivermectin on performance of cattle treated at housing. Agri-Pract. Jan:32. Selman, I. E., J.F.S. Reid, J. Armour, and F. W. Jennings. 1976. Type II ostertagiasis in adult cattle. Vet. Rec. 99:141. Schillhorn van Veen, T. W. and J. J. Melancon. 1984. The trichostrongyloid egg output during spring in feedlot cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 14:159. Soulsby, E.J.L. 1985. Advances in immunoparasitology. Vet. Parasitol. 18:303. Symons, L.E.A. 1985. Anorexia: Occurrence, pathophysiology, and possible causes in parasitic infections. Adv. Parasitol. 24:103. Tolling, S., M. Tornquist, R. M. Jones and D. H. Bliss. 1981. Further studies on the anthelmintic effect of a sustained release pre-grazing treatment with morantel in grazing cattle in Sweden. Nord. Veterinaermed. 33:339. Williams, J. C., J. W. Knox, B. A. Baumann, T. G. Snider, M. D. Kimball and T. J.Hoerner. 1983. Seasonal changes of gastrointestinal nematode populations in yearling beef cattle in Louisiana with emphasis on prevalence of inhibition of Ostertagia ostertagi. Int. J. Parasitol. 13 : 133.