RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PERFORMANCE TRAITS, INDIVIDUAL EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES AND SALE PRICES OF CENTRALLY TESTED BULLS

Similar documents
Across Breed EPD and multibreed genetic evaluation developments

EFFECT OF BREED TYPE AND QUALITY GRADE ON PERFORMANCE, CARCASS, AND TENDERNESS TRAITS FOR OK FEEDOUT STEERS

Objectives. ERTs for the New Beef Industry. Ancient History. The EPD we produce entirely depends on the tools we have to use them.

Evaluation of Horn Flies and Internal Parasites with Growing Beef Cattle Grazing Bermudagrass Pastures Findings Materials and Methods Introduction

2013 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA BCIA INFLUENCED BRED HEIFER SALE RULES & REGULATIONS

Importance of docility

2017 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA BCIA INFLUENCED BRED HEIFER SALE RULES & REGULATIONS

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WEIGHTS AND CALVING PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS IN A HERD OF UNSELECTED CATTLE

difficulty encountered; usually 30 minutes or more required to deliver calf. 5. Caesarean birth - 6. Posterior presentation -

CATTLE BREED TYPES. Many of these breeds have similar biological properties. Some are more popular than others and are used in larger numbers.

Genetic Value Bull & Female Sale

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

EAAP 2010 Annual Meeting Session 43, Paper #2 Breeding and Recording Strategies in Small Ruminants in the U.S.A.

Bringing Feed Efficiency Technology to the Beef Industry in Texas. Gordon E. Carstens Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University

GAR Supplement Sheet for 39 th Spring Sale

Factors Affecting Calving Difficulty and the Influence of Pelvic Measurements on Calving Difficulty in Percentage Limousin Heifers

LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT #3 LOT #4

The Power of NSIP to Increase Your Profits. August 17, 2015 Rusty Burgett, Program Director

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

Keeping and Using Flock Performance Records Debra K. Aaron, Animal and Food Sciences

SHOW-ME-SELECT BRED HEIFER SALE

Indiana Beef Evaluation Program

Experiences with NSIP in the Virginia Tech Flocks Scott P. Greiner, Ph.D. Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

FALL BRED HEIFER SALE. Saturday, April 30 Noon. Featuring 140 certified heifers. Coffeyville Livestock Market Coffeyville, KS

Understanding EBV Accuracy

SANDERSON PRODUCTION SALE SELLING YEARLING BULLS

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

(765) ; FAX: (765) (812) IBEP

92nd BULL SALE. Southwest Missouri. All-Breed Performance Tested. Monday October 29, :00 P.M.

The benefits of using farmer scored traits in beef genetic evaluations Abstract ICBF Introduction ICBF

Crossbreeding to Improve Productivity ASI Young Entrepreneur Meeting. David R. Notter Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences Virginia Tech

AN EVALUATION OF THE USDA AND MURPHEY CUTABILITY PREDICTION EQUATIONS AMONG SEVERAL CATTLE BREED TYPES

Dr. Dave Notter Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences Virginia Tech Host/Moderator: Jay Parsons

NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI BRED HEIFER SALE. Consignors... Randy Baker, LaPlata Jeff & Marge Lindquist, Greentop Eathington Sub-Zero

Evaluation of Columbia, USMARC- Composite, Suffolk, and Texel Rams as Terminal Sires in an Extensive Rangeland Production System

Stephen F. Austin State University Department of Agriculture Bull Development Program

BREEDPLAN A Guide to Getting Started

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

LIVESTOCK SECTION RETURN FORMS TO DIVISION CHAIRPERSON

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

Approximately 10 head of Angus bred heifers All pasture exposed to the following bull from 5/18/2016 to 8/1/2016

Alabama Beef Cattle Improvement Association 40 County Road 756 Clanton, AL

NSIP EBV Notebook June 20, 2011 Number 2 David Notter Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences Virginia Tech

BEEF & DAIRY BEEFCircle one or both

2017 Consignment Sale Guidelines

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 200 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers. November 16, 2012 at 7 PM

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine September 2011

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI SPRING CALVING

Kleinschmidt Farms Gelbvieh. Open House. Saturday, Feb. 14, :00 P.M. At The Farm Lunch Provided

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

Show-Me-Select Bred Heifer Sale

Collecting Abattoir Carcase Information

West Virginia Young Sire Evaluation Program. Wardensville Bull Test

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 350 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers. May 17, 2013 at 7 PM

Effects of Late-Summer Protein Supplementation and Deworming on Performance of Beef Calves Grazing Native Range

BUFFALO TRACE HERD BUILDER SALE

Adjustment Factors in NSIP 1

Pennsylvania Livestock Evaluation Center Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Russell C. Redding, Secretary

BLACK PUREBRED SIMMENTAL BULLS F309 - Homo Polled - Homo Black - PB Simmental - ASA# LOT 1 BORN B.WT. 205 ADJ. 205 INDEX 03/05/

LUDLOW MARKET STORE SALE FRIDAY 10 th AUGUST 2018

SHOW-ME-SELECT REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 330 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers November 16, 2018 at 7 PM

Sheep Breeding. Genetic improvement in a flock depends. Heritability, EBVs, EPDs and the NSIP Debra K. Aaron, Animal and Food Sciences

Guidelines for the 2017 West Virginia Small Ruminant Evaluation Program

USE OF MONENSIN SODIUM IN RATIONS FED TO REPLACEMENT HEIFER CALVES DURING THE WINTERING PERIOD. J.L. Nelson and D.G. Landblom

89th BULL SALE. Southwest Missouri. All-Breed Performance Tested. Monday March 27, :00 P.M.

JUNIOR BREEDING HEIFER SHOW Divisions

Alabama Beef Cattle Improvement Association 40 County Road 756 Clanton, AL

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI SPRING CALVING SHOW-ME-SELECT REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE

5 th ANNUAL CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 370 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers. November 19, 2010 at 7 PM

Some Relationships Between Measures of Growth and Carcass Composition in Lambs

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 370 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers. November 19, 2010 at 7 PM

Simple ways to use genetics to improve reproduction in beef cattle David Johnston

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROWTH OF SUFFOLK RAMS ON CENTRAL PERFORMANCE TEST AND GROWTH OF THEIR PROGENY

Cotter Suffolks and White Suffolks, with Wongarra Poll Dorsets

DEPARTMENT 06 BEEF CATTLE

Market Animal Entry Form

ENTRIES CLOSE SEPTEMBER 15, 2018

Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation for Docility in Irish Suckler Beef Cattle

West Central Missouri Show-Me-Select Spring Calving Bred Heifer Sale. Saturday, November 25, :00 a.m.

Birth Weight, Calving Ease Direct, Calving Ease Maternal, Heifer Pregnancy Rate, Docility, Milk, Mature Weight

Grand County 4-H Supreme Exhibitor 2012 BEEF STUDY GUIDE

ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION AND CALVING EASE AMONG FIRST CALF HEIFERS. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 367 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers November 17, 2017 at 7 PM

SHOW-ME-SELECT TM REPLACEMENT HEIFER SALE. 367 Crossbred & Purebred Heifers November 17, 2017 at 7 PM

RED PUREBRED SIMMENTAL BULLS F308 - Homo Polled - Solid Red - Purebred Simmental - ASA#

SELECTION TOOLS FOR TEMPERAMENT WHAT IS TEMPERAMENT? TEMPERAMENTAL CATTLE ARE MORE EASILY STRESSED THAN THEIR CALMER HERD MATES

IMPLANT PROGRAM EFFECTS ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS AND SENSORY RATINGS OF SERIALLY SLAUGHTERED HEIFERS

Central Kentucky. Top of the Crop. Replacement Heifer Sale

What will Diamond D Angus Genetics do for you?

International sheep session Focus on Iceland Eyþór Einarsson 1, Eyjólfur I. Bjarnason 1 & Emma Eyþórsdóttir 2 1

EXPECT EXCELLENCE Performance Bull and Female Sale

SOUTH MISSISSIPPI GAIN ON FORAGE

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI SPRING CALVING

SOUTH MISSISSIPPI GAIN ON FORAGE

The South African National Small Stock Improvement Scheme

Maternal Power Bull Sale

Johnston County 4-H Heifer Project Guide

Douglas County Fair 4-H Livestock Skill-a-Thon Contest

Transcription:

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PERFORMANCE TRAITS, INDIVIDUAL EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES AND SALE PRICES OF CENTRALLY TESTED BULLS S. L. Northcutt 1, B. L. Franklin 2 and D. S. Buchanan 3 Story in Brief Postweaning records were collected on 7,428 bulls completing gain tests from 1981 to 1994 at Oklahoma BEEF, Inc. Central Bull Test Station. A total of 3085 bulls (A=806 Angus, B=497 Brangus, H=533 Hereford, P=601 Polled Hereford, C=399 Charolais and L=249 Limousin) completed the 140-day test from 1981 to 1986. From 1987 to 1994, performance data were collected on 4343 bulls (A=2384 Angus, B=487 Brangus, H=220 Hereford, P=544 Polled Hereford, G=132 Gelbvieh, L=360 Limousin and S=216 Simmental) completing the 112-day test. Trends among on-test weight showed increases for all breeds except G and S. Off-test weight increased during 140-day test for all breeds, yet decreased during 112-day test for all breeds except H and P. A, P, B, and H bulls showed increases in cumulative average daily gain, while C, G and S decreased. No trends in average daily gain were evident for L bulls. Weight per day of age increased for all breeds during 140-day test. P, H and G bulls showed increases in weight per day of age during 112-day test while all other breeds decreased. Performance records were combined with selling price from 2,419 bulls sold from 1983 to 1994 to evaluate the effect that performance traits had on selling price. Price was positively correlated (P<.01) many of the performance traits, and correlations were strongest for test index, WDA, and off-test weight and off-test height. However, the magnitude of these correlations was not great. Small correlations were found among EPDs and performance traits were small but significant for Angus but not for Polled Hereford bulls. (Key Words: Beef Cattle, Performance Testing, Feedlot.) Introduction Oklahoma Beef, Incorporated (OBI) Central Bull Test Station was organized in June 1973 to locate and recognize superior breeding bulls and to provide a source of performance-tested bulls for commercial and purebred 1 Assistant Professor 2 Graduate Student 3 Professor

breeders. Over the years, numerous performance records have been collected and sales have been held. Breeders have an interest in performance trends of the OBI cattle, and they study the impact of performance records on the sale price of their bulls. Using the data currently summarized for bulls of eight breeds, the purpose of the current study was two-fold: 1) Trends in performance traits for postweaning bulls were examined and 2) Relationships among selling price, performance traits and Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) were studied to determine what performance records available to bull buyers in the sale catalog had an effect on price. Materials and Methods Oklahoma BEEF, Incorporated (OBI) is a central bull test station located eight miles west of Stillwater on land leased from Oklahoma State University. The test station is the site for postweaning gain tests for bulls of many breeds. A board of directors consisting of equal representation by 10 member breeds governs OBI. Bulls arrive at OBI for a two to three week warm-up period before the official gain test period begins. Calves arrive at OBI at 8 to 9 months of age and finish test at approximately one year of age. Two sales per year are held in conjunction with the regularly scheduled gain tests of participating breeds. Data available for the current study were from 13 years of data (1981-1994) representing complete postweaning performance records on 7,428 bulls from eight breeds. Two test lengths were represented in the data. From 1981 to 1987, bulls were placed on a 140-day gain test. In June of 1987, the test period was altered to a 112-day gain test. The 28 days removed to shorten the test were taken off the first part of the official test period. Thus, calves were arriving at an older age but would still complete the gain test at approximately 365-days of age. A total of 3,085 bulls (806 Angus, 497 Brangus, 533 Hereford, 601 Polled Hereford, 399 Charolais and 249 Limousin) completed the 140-day test from 1981 to 1986. From 1987 to 1994, performance data were collected on 4,343 bulls (2,384 Angus, 487 Brangus, 220 Hereford, 544 Polled Hereford, 132 Gelbvieh, 360 Limousin and 216 Simmental) completing the 112-day test. Performance traits included in this study were on-test weight (OFFICWT), off-test weight (OFFWT), 365-day weight (WT365), 365-day height (HT365), cumulative average daily gain (CUMADG), cumulative weight per day of age (CUMWDA), off-test scrotal circumference (SC) and test index (INDEX). In general, the index is a composite value of the cumulative ADG ratio, WT365 ratio and WDA ratio; however, the index varies slightly among breeds.

To examine trends in performance traits, data were analyzed separately by test length (112-d vs 140-d) and breed. Year and test group within year differences were considered for the various traits. Performance records were combined with selling price from 2,419 bulls (1,202 Angus, 201 Brangus, 159 Hereford, 387 Polled Hereford, 252 Limousin, 51 Charolais, 86 Simmental and 81 Gelbvieh) sold in OBI All-Breed Performance Tested Bull Sales from 1983 to 1994 to evaluate the effect that performance traits had on price. Sale catalogs were available to buyers at the time of sale. Information in the catalog included identification of the bull, sire and dam identification, pedigree, birthdate, owner, sire expected progeny differences (EPD) from 1985 to 1987, and individual EPDs from 1989 to 1994. The OBI performance data included in the catalog were: on-test weight, off-test weight, adjusted yearling height, adjusted yearling weight, scrotal circumference, average daily gain, weight per day of age, number of animals in group tested and index. The top 70% of the bulls within a test group based on index are eligible to sell in an OBI sale. Also, bulls weighing at least 1,100 lb on their WT365 and gaining at least 3.25 CUMADG qualify for the sale. Relationships among performance traits and selling price were studied by combining data available for both 140- and 112-d day tests to study sale price and performance relationships, with each breed analyzed separately. Residual correlations between performance traits and selling price were generated. The effects of year and contemporary group within year were included in the model. Simmental and Gelbvieh bulls contained only 112-day data, while Charolais bulls were only represented in the 140-day data. All other breeds contained data for both testing periods. In addition, individual expected progeny differences (EPDs) were correlated with performance traits and selling price on Angus and Polled Hereford bulls to determine their relationships. The EPDs represented individual estimates at the time of sale and were taken from OBI catalogs from 1989 to 1994. EPDs included were birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW) and maternal milk (MM). The number of observations for Polled Hereford bulls were 142, 139, 139 and 139 for BW, WW, YW and MM EPDs, respectively. Among Angus bulls the number of observations were 537, 643, 396, and 633 for BW, WW, YW and MM EPDs, respectively. Any performance traits available to potential buyers were included in the study, with the exception of ultrasonic fat and ribeye area measures. Correlations were generated separately for each particular EPD and the performance traits. Selling price and EPD correlations were generated using a model which included BW, WW, YW, MM EPDs, and price. Data from 479 bulls (348 Angus and 131 Polled Hereford) were used to generate correlations between EPDs and price for each breed.

Results and Discussion Number of bulls tested by year has varied over time. Figure 1 presents the number of bulls across all breeds in the OBI program from 1980 to 1995. A low point in testing numbers occurred in 1986. This low point may have been due in part to the cattle prices at that time. Performance trends for off-test weight are depicted graphically by plotting the least squares means by year and breed in Figure 2. Although the 140-d and 112-d records were analyzed separately, they are pictured together on the graphs with a vertical line at 1987 to mark the change to the 112-d feeding period. For the 140-d test, on-test and off-test weights tended to increase between 1982 and 1987. Year and test group effects were important sources of variation (P<.01) in these weights. For the 112-d test period, year differences were not generally evident for weight. Height is a trait that has gone through changes in the beef industry over time. In both the 140-d and 112-d tests, significant year differences (P<.01) were found. Since 1982, changes have occurred in the on-test and 365-d heights for bulls tested at OBI. HT365 increased over both test periods for all breeds except Simmental and Charolais. WT365 showed an increase for all breeds during 140-day test. Increases in WT365 during 112-day test were shown for Polled Hereford, Hereford and Gelbvieh, while weights of other breeds decreased. Angus, Polled Hereford, Brangus, and Hereford bulls showed increases in CUMADG, while Charolais, Gelbvieh and Simmental decreased. No trends in CUMADG were evident for Limousin bulls. CUMWDA increased for all breeds during 140-day test. Polled Hereford, Hereford and Gelbvieh bulls showed increases in CUMWDA during 112-day test while all other breeds decreased. Correlations among sale price and performance traits are given in Table 1. Price was positively correlated (P<.01) with all the performance traits where correlations are presented. Correlations of price with other traits were strongest for test index, WDA, and off-test weight and off-test height. However, the magnitude of these correlations was not great, with the highest correlation being.53 between price and test index among Gelbvieh bulls. Scrotal circumference was more lowly correlated with price. Changes in price per unit change in each trait accounted for 40 to 58% of the variation in selling price due to performance traits. Individual expected progeny differences (EPDs) were correlated with selling price and performance traits on Angus and Polled Hereford bulls to determine their relationships. EPDs included were birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW) and maternal milk (MM). Small correlations were found among EPDs and performance traits for both breeds.

Significant correlations between EPDs and price were also small and positive for Angus (Table 1). These phenotypic correlations were nonsignificant in the Polled Hereford data. It is important to consider that other factors may have an influence on sale price. Sale order, pedigree, reputation of the breeder, and other factors may have effect. Also, the impact of visual appraisal of the bulls prior and during the sale is unknown.

Table 1. Correlations a between price and other traits. Breed Trait AN BR HF PH CH LM SM GB OFFICWT.23.28... b.32....29.37... OFFWT.46.44.38.47....42.36.41 HT365.26.28.44.36.46.38....40 WT365.46.38.42.42.43.45.52.46 CUMADG.41.32.37.34....23....44 CUMWDA.45.42.44.46.39.50.51.46 SC.17.23.23.............33 INDEX.52.45.51.47.46.50.35.53 EPD-BW...... EPD-WW.19... EPD-YW.24... EPD-MILK.27... a All correlations were significant (P<.01). b Nonsignificant correlations were not presented.

Figure 1. Number of bulls finishing test by year (1980-1995). No. of Bulls 1200 1000 876 1125 1008 800 600 400 200 730 735 630 670 414 441 232 479 553 663 601 682 750 0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Year

Figure 2. Off-test (OFFWT) weight trends by year and breed. lb 1350 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 1050 1000 950 900 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Year ANGUS BRANGUS HEREFORD POLLED HER. LIMOUSIN CHAROLAIS GELBVIEH SIMMENTAL