Epidemiology and Burden of Antimicrobial-Resistant P. aeruginosa Infections

Similar documents
Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Topics to be Covered

Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery. Better understanding of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance

MID 23. Antimicrobial Resistance. Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance Acquisition of Foreign DNA

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Fighting MDR Pathogens in the ICU

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

Antibiotic Resistance. Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Concern. Antibiotic resistance is not new 3/21/2011

Infection Prevention Highlights for the Medical Staff. Pamela Rohrbach MSN, RN, CIC Director of Infection Prevention

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Infectious Disease: Drug Resistance Pattern in New Mexico

Antimicrobial Stewardship/Statewide Antibiogram. Felicia Matthews Senior Consultant, Pharmacy Specialty BD MedMined Services

4/3/2017 CLINICAL PEARLS: UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

What s next in the antibiotic pipeline?

9/30/2016. Dr. Janell Mayer, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS Dr. Lindsey Votaw, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Challenges Emerging resistance Fewer new drugs MRSA and other resistant pathogens are major problems

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital,

What does multiresistance actually mean? Yohei Doi, MD, PhD University of Pittsburgh

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL. Antibiotic Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

Using Web-Based Instruction Modules to Improve Practitioner Knowledge at Yale New Haven Hospital on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance and

ETX2514: Responding to the global threat of nosocomial multidrug and extremely drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

RESISTANT PATHOGENS. John E. Mazuski, MD, PhD Professor of Surgery

Hospital Acquired Infections in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance

Update on Resistance and Epidemiology of Nosocomial Respiratory Pathogens in Asia. Po-Ren Hsueh. National Taiwan University Hospital

Sepsis is the most common cause of death in

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

Outline. Antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial resistance in gram negative bacilli. % susceptibility 7/11/2010

Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Bad Bugs. Pharmacist Learning Objectives. Antimicrobial Resistance. Patient Case. Pharmacy Technician Learning Objectives 4/8/2016

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Dr. Shaiful Azam Sazzad. MD Student (Thesis Part) Critical Care Medicine Dhaka Medical College

Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter (MDRA) Surveillance and Control. Alison Holmes

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

EARS Net Report, Quarter

PRACTIC GUIDELINES for APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTICS USE

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria

on April 8, 2018 by guest

Imagine. Multi-Drug Resistant Superbugs- What s the Big Deal? A World. Without Antibiotics. Where Simple Infections can be Life Threatening

Please distribute a copy of this information to each provider in your organization.

Samantha Trumm, Pharm.D. PGY-1 Resident Avera McKennan Hospital and University Center

Breaking the Ring. β-lactamases and the Great Arms Race. Bryce M Kayhart, PharmD, BCPS PGY2 Pharmacotherapy Resident Mayo Clinic - Rochester

Nosocomial Infections: What Are the Unmet Needs

DR. MICHAEL A. BORG DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL MATER DEI HOSPITAL - MALTA

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Antimicrobial stewardship in managing septic patients

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE. Syed Ziaur Rahman, MD, PhD D/O Pharmacology, JNMC, AMU, Aligarh

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

Antibiotic resistance a mechanistic overview Neil Woodford

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Rise of Resistance: From MRSA to CRE

Detecting / Reporting Resistance in Nonfastidious GNR Part #2. Janet A. Hindler, MCLS MT(ASCP)

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

Mike Apley Kansas State University

03/09/2014. Infection Prevention and Control A Foundation Course. Talk outline

MDRO in LTCF: Forming Networks to Control the Problem

Available online at ISSN No:

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the European Union

Infection Control of Emerging Diseases

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

Addressing the evolving challenge of β-lactamase mediated antimicrobial resistance: ETX2514, a next-generation BLI with potent broadspectrum

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE THREATS. in the United States, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword...5 Executive Summary...6 Section 1: The Threat of Antibiotic Resistance...11 Introduction...11 National Summary Data...

What bugs are keeping YOU up at night?

Transcription:

Epidemiology and Burden of Antimicrobial-Resistant P. aeruginosa Infections Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, Michigan

The Burden of HAIs in the US On any given day, approximately one in 25 US patients has at least one infection contracted during the course of their hospital care >700,000 HAIs annually ~75,000 patients with HAI die during hospitalization More than half of all HAIs occur outside of the intensive care unit HAIs, healthcare-associated infections. CDC. Healthcare-associated infections. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/surveillance/index.html.

HAIs in US Acute Care Hospitals Major Site of Infection Estimated No. Pneumonia 157,500 Gastrointestinal illness 123,100 Urinary tract infections 93,300 Primary bloodstream infections 71,900 Surgical site infections from any inpatient surgery 157,500 Other types of infections 118,500 Estimated total number of HAIs 721,800 Data from HAI Prevalence Survey, 2011. CDC. Healthcare-associated infections. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/surveillance/index.html.

CDC Recognized Bacterial Threats Urgent Threats Clostridium difficile Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Serious Threats MDR P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae MRSA and VRE Various drug-resistant species (Campylobacter, S. pneumoniae, Salmonella, tuberculosis, Shigella) CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf.

HAIs Attributed to Antibiotic-Resistant Threat Bacteria* Pathogen CAUTI No. tested (% Resistant) SSI No. tested (% Resistant) CLABSI No. tested (% Resistant) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) 629 (49) 3212 (44) 2556 (47.3) 4690 (21.7) 3427 (18) 3079 (44.6) ESBL Enterobacteriaceae 11,146 (16.0) 4184 (12.6) 2804 (21.1) Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae 10,530 (2.8) 4441 (1.3) 3199 (4.9) MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3392 (13.9) 1061 (6.5) 810 (15.7) MDR Acinetobacter baumannii 171 (63) 63 (47.6 369 (36.6) *CDC National Healthcare Safety Network data compiled from acute care hospitals, 2008-2014. CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract Infection; SSI, surgical site infection; CLABSI, central lineassociated bloodstream Infection. Weiner LM, et al. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2016;65:235-41.

MDR P. aeruginosa: Serious Threat Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and surgical site infections Resistance of Concern Some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been found to be resistant to nearly all or all antibiotics including aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems Approximately 8% of all healthcare-associated infections reported to CDC s National Healthcare Safety Network are caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. About 13% of severe healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruigonsa are multidrug resistant, meaning several classes of antibiotics no longer cure infections. Public Health Threat An estimated 51,000 healthcare-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections occur in the United States each year. More than 6,000 (or 13%) of these are multidrug-resistant, with roughly 400 deaths per year attributed to these infections. Multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa Percentage of P. aeruginosa HAIs that are multidrugresistant Estimated number of infections Estimated number of deaths attributed 13% 6700 440 CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf.

P. aeruginosa is a Common Cause of HAIs P. aeruginosa accounts for 7.5% of all HAIs in US hospitals (fifth-leading cause among all bacteria)* P. aeruginosa is a major cause of various types of HAIs Infection Type Rank Among All HAI Pathogens CLABSI 10 CAUTI 2 VAP 2 SSI 5 *Data compiled by CDC National Healthcare Safety Network from 2039 hospitals and 69,475 reported HAIs from 2009-2010. CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infections; SSI, surgical site infection; CLABSI, central lineassociated bloodstream Infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia. Sievert DM, et al. ICHE. 2013;34:1-14.

P. aeruginosa Frequently Exhibits Resistance and Multidrug-Resistance According to the CDC NHSN, approximately 23% of HAIs caused by P. aeruginosa are resistant to carbapenems NHSN Data for 2009 2010 P. aeruginosa phenotype Type of HAI CLABSI CAUTI VAP SSI Carbapenem-resistant 26.1% 21.3% 30.2% 11.0% Multidrug-resistant* 15.4% 14.0% 17.7% 5.3% *Pathogen must test as I or R to at least 1 drug in 3 of the 5 following classes: extended-spectrum cephalosporins, respiratory fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and piperacillin or piperacillin/tazobactam CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; SSI, surgical site infection; CLABSI, central lineassociated bloodstream infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia. Sievert DM, et al. ICHE 2013;34:1-14.

P. aeruginosa Utilizes a Multitude of Resistance Mechanisms Intrinsically resistant to many antimicrobials Acquire resistance determinants commonly via mutations or via horizontal gene transfer Outer membrane Peptidoglycan Periplasmic space Cell membrane Lister PD, et al. Clin Micro Rev. 2009;22:582-610.

P. aeruginosa Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance Antimicrobial class β-lactams Fluoroquinolones Aminoglycosides Mechanism of resistance β-lactamases (endogenous and acquired) Efflux pumps Changes in outer membrane permeability Target site mutations Efflux pumps Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes Efflux pumps 16s RNA methylases Polymyxins Changes in lipopolysaccharide Meletis and Bagkeri, Intech, 2013, http://www.intechopen.com/books/infection-control/pseudomonasaeruginosa-multi-drug-resistance-development-and-treatment-options. Lister PD, et al. Clin Micro Rev. 2009;22:582-610.

Antimicrobial-Resistant P. aeruginosa is Associated with Adverse Outcomes MDR P. aeruginosa (compared to matched uninfected controls) associated with 1 4.4-fold increase in mortality 2-fold increase in duration of hospitalization Imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (compared to imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa) associated with: 2 OR for mortality 5.43 in bloodstream infection Longer duration of hospitalization by 7 days Increased hospital charges of $85,299 1. Aloush V, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:43-48. 2. Lautenbach E, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:47-53.

The Impact of MDR P. aeruginosa on Mortality Tam VH, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3717-22.

Summary P. aeruginosa is a leading cause of various types of HAIs in the US, including CLABSI, CAUTI, VAP, and SSI MDR P. aeruginosa is recognized by the CDC as a serious threat Antimicrobial-resistant P. aeruginosa infections result in poorer clinical outcomes and higher economic costs compared to susceptible infections

Recognizing the Various Resistance Mechanisms Utilized by P. aeruginosa Keith A. Rodvold, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Medicine Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL

The Versatility of P. aeruginosa Resistance Mechanisms Pseudomonas aeruginosa possesses intrinsic resistance to many antibiotic classes Pseudomonas aeruginosa has the ability to develop resistance by mutations in different chromosomal loci Pseudomonas aeruginosa can develop resistance by horizontal acquisition of resistance genes carried on plasmids, transposons or integrons The frequent acquisition of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenges the use of antibiograms as a tool in epidemiological typing Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Winkler ML, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1020-1029. Mucoid layer P. aeruginosa has a mucoid layer outside the outer membrane; increased thickness of this layer Outer membrane porins Loss of porins inhibits antibiotic entry Efflux pumps P. aeruginosa can carry efflux pumps in the outer membrane; when present, antibiotics can be pumped out the cell Beta-lactamase upregulation Regulation of the chromosomal AmpC, which involves a complex relationships between peptidoglycan breakdown, beta-lactam exposure, and gene regulation leading to overexpression of the AmpC enzyme In periplasmic space of the bacteria; able to break down beta-lactam antibiotics and/or beta-lactamase inhibitors PBP alterations In peptidoglycan layer; altered to prevent interaction of antibiotics with their targets

P. aeruginosa: Intrinsic Resistance Inducible chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase Renders Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to: ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and first- and secondgeneration cephalosporins, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone Multidrug efflux systems Exist in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that can result in expulsion of: β-lactams, chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, novobiocin, sulfonamides, tetracycline, trimethoprim, and aminoglycosides Can also export virulence determinants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enhancing toxicity to the host Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: A Variety of Resistance Mechanisms Acquired resistance Efflux pumps Impermeability mutations β-lactamases Carbapenemases Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes Transmissible quinolone resistance Adaptive resistance Multidrug resistance Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: Acquired Resistance Efflux pumps MexAB-OprM is synthesized constitutively in all strains Upregulation or a mutation in the mexr repressor gene (nalb mutant) results in efflux pump overproduction and significant increases in MICs of quinolones, penicillins, cephalosporins, aztreonam, and meropenem (low-level resistance, MIC 8 to 32 µg/ml), but not imipenem Upregulation of efflux pumps (MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM) is an important determinant of resistance to quinolones and aminoglycosides Impermeability mutations Can result in resistance to carbapenems (e.g., loss of the OprD porin), aminoglycosides, colistin, and quinolones Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: Acquired Resistance (cont d) β-lactamases Mutations in the regulatory mechanisms of the chromosomally-encoded AmpC β-lactamase lead to constitutive expression of high-level enzymes Confer resistance predominantly to antipseudomonal penicillins, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam, but not carbapenems Poorly inhibited by clavulanic acid or tazobactam Carbapenemases Nearly all carbapenemases in P. aeruginosa belong to Amber class B (commonly referred to as metalloenzymes) Metalloenzymes hydrolyze all β-lactam antibiotics except aztreonam, and are associated with high-level (MIC >32 µg/ml) carbapenem resistance Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: Acquired Resistance (cont d) Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes Drug inactivation by plasmid-encoded or chromosomallyencoded enzymes is the most common mechanism for resistance to the aminoglycosides Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes can occur together with impermeability mutations, resulting in broad-spectrum aminoglycoside resistance Transmissible quinolone resistance Plasmid-borne quinolone resistance determinant (qnr) Associated with high-level quinolone resistance Appears to be associated with integrons that carry determinants for resistance to β-lactams and aminoglycosides Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: Adaptive Resistance Is inducible and depends on the presence of either an antibiotic or environmental stimulus Triggering factors modulate the expression of many genes, leading to effects on efflux pumps, the cell envelope, and enzymes Once the triggering factor or condition is removed, the organism reverts back to its wild-type susceptibility Most commonly involved with aminoglycosides, polymyxins, and cationic antimicrobial peptides Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

P. aeruginosa: Multidrug Resistance Multidrug (3 or more antimicrobial classes) resistance by P. aeruginosa is widespread (with geographic variability) and increasing worldwide Genetic background of the multidrug- or pan-drugresistant P. aeruginosa has been shown to be a combination of: AmpC hyperproduction OprD inactivation Target mutations conferring high-level fluoroquinolone resistance Mutations involved in efflux pump overexpression Production of a class 1 integron harboring aminoglycosidehydrolyzing enzymes Høiby N, et al. Pseudomonas. Chapter 42. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th edition, 2015; 773-790.

Multiple Mechanisms Render P. aeruginosa Infections a Challenge Study of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates from US hospital that were non-susceptible to ceftazidime Resistance Mechanism AmpC derepression (10-fold greater than control) % of Isolates 47.5% OprD loss (decreased/no band) 45.8% Elevated expression of efflux pumps (5-fold greater than control) -MexAB-OprM -MexXY-OprM 32.5% 28.4% Castanheira M, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:6844-50.

Summary P. aeruginosa utilizes various types of resistance mechanisms that are intrinsic, acquired, or adaptive Acquired resistance superimposed on intrinsic resistance renders P. aeruginosa infections a therapeutic challenge Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa is widespread and increasing worldwide

Antimicrobial-Resistant P. aeruginosa: CDC Data from 2011 2014 Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, Michigan

CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html Uses data reported to CDC NHSN from 2011 to 2014 from 4403 healthcare facilities Data collected from procedure- and devicerelated HAIs: CLABSI, CAUTI, and SSI 31 resistance phenotypes evaluated, including those identified by CDC as urgent or serious threats CAUTI, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections; SSI, surgical site infection; CLABSI, Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection

Antibiotic-Resistant P. aeruginosa, All HAIs 2011 2014 Resistance type Overall 2011 2012 2013 2014 Carbapenem (N=22,593) 19.3% 20.0% 17.8% 20.4% 19.2% Cephalosporin (N=26,772) Fluoroquinolone (N=26,897) Aminoglycoside (N=27,197) Piperacillin/ tazobactam (N=23,662) Multidrug-Resistant (N=27,289) 10.3% 11.7% 9.9% 10.8% 9.5% 21.6% 23.5% 20.8% 22.3% 20.7% 9.7% 10.6% 9.1% 9.8% 9.6% 10.0% 12.8% 10.0% 10.1% 9.0% 14.2% 15.7% 13.3% 14.8% 13.5% CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 19.3% # Resistant: 4365 # Tested: 22,593 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 19.3% # Resistant: 4365 # Tested: 22,593 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-Resistant P. aeruginosa Piperacillin/tazobactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 10% # Resistant: 2378 # Tested: 23,662 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-Resistant P. aeruginosa Piperacillin/tazobactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 10% # Resistant: 2378 # Tested: 23,662 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Cephalosporin-Resistant P. aeruginosa Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 10.3% # Resistant: 2763 # Tested: 26,772 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Cephalosporin-Resistant P. aeruginosa Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 10.3% # Resistant: 2763 # Tested: 26,772 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Antibiotic-Resistant P. aeruginosa by Specific HAI, 2011 2014 Resistance type All HAI CAUTI CLABSI SSI Carbapenem (N=22,593) 19.3% 23.2% 25.8% 8.6% Cephalosporin (N=26,772) 10.3% 12.0% 15.0% 5.0% Fluoroquinolone (N=26,897) 21.6% 27.5% 24.9% 8.9% Aminoglycoside (N=27,197) 9.7% 12.8% 11.5% 2.9% Piperacillin/tazobactam (N=23,662) 10.0% 11.8% 14.3% 4.7% Multidrug-Resistant (N=27,289) 14.2% 18.0% 18.8% 4.8% HAI, hospital-acquired infection; CAUTI, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections; SSI, surgical site infection; CLABSI, Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CAUTI Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) CAUTI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 23.2% # Resistant: 2970 # Tested: 12,815 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CAUTI Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) CAUTI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 23.2% # Resistant: 2970 # Tested: 12,815 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Multidrug-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CAUTI MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa CAUTI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 18% # Resistant: 2791 # Tested: 15,464 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CLABSI Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) CLABSI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 25.8% # Resistant: 830 # Tested: 3219 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CLABSI Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) CLABSI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 25.8% # Resistant: 830 # Tested: 3219 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Carbapenem-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CLABSI Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Resistant or Intermediate) CLABSI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 25.8% # Resistant: 830 # Tested: 3219 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Multidrug-Resistant P. aeruginosa, CLABSI MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa CLABSI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 18.8% # Resistant: 693 # Tested: 3686 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Multidrug-Resistant P. aeruginosa, SSI MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa SSI Combined Years (2011 2014) National resistance: 4.8% # Resistant: 387 # Tested: 8139 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Treatment Principles for P. aeruginosa Empiric therapy Infections Coverage for P. aeruginosa recommended for patients with certain risk factors, including recent healthcare exposure. Typically 2 agents from different classes are used for empiric coverage for P. aeruginosa to increase the likelihood of providing effective empiric therapy Often β-lactam + aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone

Treatment Principles for P. aeruginosa Definitive therapy Infections Once P. aeruginosa has been identified and antimicrobial susceptibilities have been determined, therapy can be modified appropriately Therapy is challenging for many cases of MDR P. aeruginosa In some cases of extreme drug resistance (XDR), older toxic agents such as colistin have been used

Utilizing Antibiograms Annual summary of susceptibility rates for a healthcare institution Can help inform empiric antimicrobial choices Particularly important for resistant bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa Unit-level antibiograms helpful Provide data even more locally than institution-wide antibiogram Often differences in susceptibility between intensive care unit and ward unit Combination antibiogram Provides susceptibility rates for a combination of antimicrobials (i.e. for a given pathogen, the rates of susceptibility to at least one agent in a given combination) Particularly valuable for P. aeruginosa given the high rates of antimicrobial resistance Hindler J, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:867-73. Thurman L, et al. Am J Infect Dis. 2014;10:88-94. Smith Z, et al. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016;22:409-15.

Utilizing Antimicrobial Stewardship Appropriate use of antimicrobials The right agent, dose, timing, duration, route Optimize clinical outcomes Optimize time to effective therapy Limit drug-related adverse events Minimize risk of unintentional consequences Help reduce antimicrobial resistance The combination of effective antimicrobial stewardship and infection control has been shown to limit the emergence of antimicrobialresistant bacteria Particularly important for MDR Gram-negative bacilli, such as P. aeruginosa Drew RH. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15(2 Suppl):S18 S23. Drew RH et al. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(5):593 607. Barlam TF, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:e51-76.

Summary P. aeruginosa is a common healthcare-associated pathogen MDR P. aeruginosa is increasing in frequency and is associated with poor clinical outcomes Resistance complicates therapy and limits antimicrobial options Knowing local resistance trends, through surveillance studies and institutional antibiograms, can help guide empiric treatment decisions Antimicrobial stewardship strategies are important in preventing the emergence and spread of MDR P. aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility Profile Keith A. Rodvold, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Medicine Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL

Antibiotic Resistance Threats Gram-Negative Organism Cases (%) Deaths (%) Threat Level ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae 26,000 (1.93) 1700 (7.44) Serious Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae 9300 (0.69) 610 (2.67) Urgent Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6700 (0.5) 440 (1.92) Serious Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. 7300 (0.54) 500 (2.18) Serious Estimated annual incidence of infection due to notable antimicrobial-resistant organisms Total: 1,349,766 cases and 22,840 deaths ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Thabit AK, et al. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015;16:159-177 Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs, 2011 2014 National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas Allows users to visualize and download antimicrobial resistance data at national, regional, and state levels Includes device- and procedure-related infections reported to NHSN from 2011 2014 from over 4400 healthcare facilities Publicly available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html NHSN, National Healthcare Safety Network

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs, 2011 2014 National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs, 2011 2014 National resistance: 14.2% CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs, 2011 2014 National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa All HAIs, 2011 2014 National resistance: 14.2% # Resistant: 3871 # Tested: 27,289 Publicly available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html CDC Antibiotic Resistance Patient Safety Atlas. Available at: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/psa/mapview.html.

Antibiotic Treatment of Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms Infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms are associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to susceptible counterparts Choice of empiric therapy has become more difficult for serious infections because antimicrobial resistance to first-line agents Clinicians also have the dilemma between choosing: an agent that is inactive versus broad-spectrum agent monotherapy versus combination therapy determining the role of adjunctive therapy newer versus older agents

In vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Agents Against P. aeruginosa Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-icu patients from US Hospital (2012 2013): Antimicrobial Agents Sader HS, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015; 46: 53-59. ICU n = 842 % Susceptible Non-ICU n = 2240 Ceftazidime 77.7 86.9 Cefepime 79.8 86.1 Piperacillin tazobactam 71.2 82.2 Meropenem 76.6 84.7 Levofloxacin 76.4 75.4 Amikacin 98.6 97.9 Colistin 100.0 99.9

Newer Antipseudomonal Agents Ceftolozane-tazobactam 1-3 Demonstrated in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates tested that had: Chromosomal AmpC or Loss of outer membrane porin (OprD) or Up-regulation of efflux pumps (MexXY, MexAB) Not active against bacteria producing metallo-β-lactamases Ceftazidime-avibactam 3-5 Demonstrated in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of: some AmpC beta-lactamases or certain strains lacking outer membrane porin (OprD) Not active against bacteria producing metallo-β-lactamases and may not have activity against Gram-negative bacteria that overexpress efflux pumps or have porin mutations 1. Takeda S, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:443-5. 2. Takeda S, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:826-30. 3. Castanheira M, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:6844-50. 4. Cabot G, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3091-3099. 5. Berrazeg M, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6248-55.

In vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Against P. aeruginosa Isolates from Hospitalized Pneumonia Patients (2012) Current FDA susceptibility interpretive criteria for ceftolozane/tazobactam P. aeruginosa resistance phenotype Farrell DJ, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014; 43: 533-539. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (µg/ml) Pathogen Susceptible (S) Intermediate (I) Resistant (R) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 / 4 8 / 4 16 / 4 Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against P. aeruginosa resistance phenotypes Cumulative (%) inhibited at MIC in µg/ml of: 4 8 16 MIC 50 / MIC 90 (µg/ml) All P. aeruginosa isolates (n=1019) 92.6 94.1 94.6 0.5 / 4 Ceftazidime-non-S (n=269) 72.1 77.7 79.6 4 / >32 Cefepime-non-S (n=239) 70.7 77.0 79.1 4 / >32 Meropenem-non-S (n=268) 75.7 78.0 79.9 2 / >32 Piperacillin-tazobactam-non-S (n=311) 76.5 81.4 83.0 2 / >32 CAZ & MEM & P/T-non-S (n=158) 60.1 63.9 67.1 4 / >32 Levofloxacin-non-S (n=307) 81.4 82.7 84.4 2 / >32 Gentamicin-non-S (n=197) 71.6 73.1 75.1 2 / >32 Multidrug-resistant (MDR) (n=246) 72.4 75.6 77.6 2 / >32 Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (n=174) 63.2 66.1 69.0 4 / >32

In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against P. aeruginosa Isolates from Hospitalized Patients (2012-13) Current FDA susceptibility interpretive criteria for ceftazidime-avibactam P. aeruginosa isolates, by site and resistance phenotype Sader HS, et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015; 46: 53-59. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (µg/ml) Pathogen Susceptible (S) Resistant (R) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8 / 4 16 / 4 Ceftazidime-avibactam activity against P. aeruginosa by site and resistance phenotypes Cumulative (%) inhibited at MIC in µg/ml of: 4 8 16 MIC 50 / MIC 90 (µg/ml) All P. aeruginosa isolates (n=3082) 91.7 97.0 99.0 2 / 4 non-icu (n=2240) 93.2 97.5 99.2 2 / 4 ICU (n=842) 87.9 95.6 98.3 2 / 4 VAP (n=185) 92.4 97.3 100.0 2 / 4 Ceftazidime-non-S (n=482) 60.2 80.7 93.4 4 / 16 Meropenem-non-S (n=537) 67.8 87.0 95.3 4 / 16 Multidrug-resistant (MDR) (n=436) 57.3 80.7 93.1 4 / 16 Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) (n=247) 46.6 74.5 89.1 8 / 32

Activity Summary MDR P. aeruginosa is widespread and increasing worldwide Susceptibility to traditional agents can vary considerably based on regional and local factors, necessitating the use of combination therapy Newer antipseudomonal agents may offer an effective option against MDR isolates Antimicrobial stewardship strategies can potentially improve clinical outcomes and reduce resistance development