UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Similar documents
Brief reports. Decreased susceptibility to imipenem among penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Christiane Gaudreau* and Huguette Gilbert

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Tel: Fax:

European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) in Scotland: 2004

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Annual Report: Table 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results for 2,488 Isolates of S. pneumoniae Collected Nationally, 2005 MIC (µg/ml)

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Because meningococcal disease is such a serious and rapidly progressing illness, it is very important to monitor trends in the

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis to antimicrobial agents used to treat respiratory tract infections.

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Focus Technologies, Inc., 1 Hilversum, The Netherlands, 2 Herndon, Virginia and 3 Franklin, Tennessee, USA

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

A review of antibiotic resistance patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Europe

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

Jan A. Jacobs* and Ellen E. Stobberingh

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Original Article. Hossein Khalili a*, Rasool Soltani b, Sorrosh Negahban c, Alireza Abdollahi d and Keirollah Gholami e.

J. M. Blondeau*, M. Suter, S. Borsos and the Canadian Antimicrobial Study Group

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

Barriers to Intravenous Penicillin Use for Treatment of Nonmeningitis

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Detection and Quantitation of the Etiologic Agents of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Endotracheal Tube Aspirates From Patients in Iran

Use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Guidelines for Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing in New York State Laboratories

Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal 2(6): , 2014, Article no. OR SCIENCEDOMAIN international

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Modeling the Emergence of Multidrug Antibiotic Resistance

Neisseria meningitidis ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE:CURRENT SITUATION IN LATIN AMERICA AND ITS CLINICAL RELEVANCE

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

JAC Linezolid against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant pneumococci in the rabbit meningitis model

Breakthrough pneumococcal bacteraemia in patients treated with clarithromycin or oral β-lactams

Background and Plan of Analysis

Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net)

Marc Decramer 3. Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae: Patterns, Mechanisms, Interpreting the Breakpoints

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

Received 19 December 2005/Returned for modification 22 February 2006/Accepted 3 May 2006

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

BIOLACTAM. Product Description. An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Clinical Failure of Ceftriaxone Treatment in a Patient with penicillin Resistant Pneumococcal Meningitis

Method Preferences and Test Accuracy of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

n Am I B I A U n IVE RS ITV OF SCIEnCE AnD TECH n 0 LOGY

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

Empiric Treatment of Sepsis. Professor of Clinical Microbiology Department of Microbiology Leicester University U. K.

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

and Health Sciences, Wayne State University and Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA

Towards Rational International Antibiotic Breakpoints: Actions from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

Bacterial Resistance of Respiratory Pathogens. John C. Rotschafer, Pharm.D. University of Minnesota

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Overnight identification of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carriage in hospitalized patients

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

Gram-positive cocci Staphylococci and Streptococcia

Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program 2018 SURVEILLANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACQUIRED CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNT ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

CLSI vs. EUCAST. What is EUCAST? Structure of EUCAST CLSI. Where they fit? SASCM WORKSHOP 5/24/2014

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

DO NOT WRITE ON or THROW AWAY THIS PAPER!

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

The UK 5-year AMR Strategy - a brief overview - Dr Berit Muller-Pebody National Infection Service Public Health England

Key words: Campylobacter, diarrhea, MIC, drug resistance, erythromycin

Pneumococcal Infections in Trinidad: Patterns of Antimicrobial Susceptibility:

Who should read this document? 2. Key practice points 2. Background/ Scope/ Definitions 2. What is new in this version? 3

American Association of Feline Practitioners American Animal Hospital Association

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

BSAC antimicrobial susceptibility

amoxycillin/clavulanate vs placebo in the prevention of infection after animal

Vaccination as a potential strategy to combat Antimicrobial Resistance in the elderly

SAMPLE. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals

Irrational use of antimicrobial agents often

Transcription:

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing meningitis in the Netherlands 1993-1994 Enting, R.H.; Spanjaard, L.; van de Beek, D.; Hensen, E.F.; de Gans, J.; Dankert, J. Published in: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Enting, R. H., Spanjaard, L., van de Beek, D., Hensen, E. F., de Gans, J., & Dankert, J. (1997). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing meningitis in the Netherlands 1993-1994. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 38, 777-786. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) Download date: 17 Oct 2018

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1996) 38, Ill-lid Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing meningitis in The Netherlands, 1993-1994 R. H. Enting*, L. Spanjaard*, D. van de Beek', E. F. Hensen', J. de Gans* and J. Dankert* "Department of Neurology H2-214, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam; b The Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands The increasing antimicrobial resistance among pathogens frequently isolated from patients with bacterial meningitis formed the rationale to perform a surveillance study to determine the prevalence of resistance in The Netherlands. Haemophilus influenzae strains (n = 316) isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 1125 meningococcal strains isolated from blood or CSF and 398 pneumococcal strains isolated from CSF in 1993 and 1994 were tested by the Etest for susceptibility to commonly prescribed antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired meningitis. In H. influenzae strains ampicillin-resistance occurred in 7.0%, resistance to chloramphenicol in 2.2%, and resistance to both antibiotics in 0.9%. The prevalence of intermediate penicillin-resistance in meningococci was 3.3%. Resistance to rifampicin was rarely found (0.1%). Intermediate penicillin-resistance in pneumococci was found in only 0.5% of isolates. All 1839 isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone. Based on these results, we conclude that empirical therapy of childhood community-acquired bacterial meningitis with amoxycillin and chloramphenicol is no longer justified in children who have not been vaccinated against H. influenzae type b. In vaccinated or older children and adults, amoxycillin is a rational choice for empirical treatment of meningitis. The prophylactic use of rifampicin in contacts of patients with meningococcal disease is still applicable. Introduction The annual incidence of bacterial meningitis in The Netherlands is estimated to be 7 8 cases per 100,000 persons. The three most common bacterial pathogens causing community-acquired meningitis are Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, being responsible for 95% of all cases. The incidence of H. influenzae type b meningitis in The Netherlands has decreased since vaccination against this bacterium was introduced in July 1993 (Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (RIVM/UvA), 1994, 1995). The empirical treatment of acute bacterial meningitis is based on the anticipated bacterial species in each age group and clinical setting, the antibiotic susceptibility of the infecting organism, the achievement of bactericidal concentrations in the CSF, and 777 0305-7453/96/110777 + 10 $12.00/0 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

778 R. H. Enting et al. the potential side effects. Guidelines for initial treatment of community-acquired bacterial meningitis in The Netherlands recommend amoxycillin and chloramphenicol in the age group 4 months-10 years, and penicillin or amoxycillin in older children or adults, until the results of culture and susceptibility-testing are known. In case of susceptible N. meningitidis or S. pneumoniae isolates, benzylpenicillin alone is recommended, and for amoxycillin-susceptible H. influenzae chloramphenicol is discontinued. Cephalosporins have become a useful alternative (Roord, 1989). These Dutch guidelines are comparable with those in the UK (Lambert, 1994). Surveillance studies are important to monitor changing patterns of resistance. Conventional methods of determining the MIC of isolates are time-consuming, but a new method, the Etest, which combines disc diffusion and agar dilution principles is simple and accurate (Jorgensen, Howell & Maher, 1991; Hughes et al., 1993; Jorgensen et al., 1994). In order to update guidelines for the empirical treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial meningitis over the age of 4 months in The Netherlands, we determined the MICs of antibiotics for the three predominant pathogens. Rifampicin is recommended for chemoprophylaxis of meningococcal disease and MICs of this antibiotic were also determined (Roord, 1989). Bacterial strains and growth conditions Materials and methods The Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis of the University of Amsterdam and the National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM) in Amsterdam collects strains causing meningitis across the country. In 1993 and 1994, the Reference Laboratory received 1765 strains isolated from CSF and/or blood from patients with bacterial meningitis (316 H. influenzae, 830 N. meningitidis, 398 5. pneumoniae, and 221 miscellaneous bacteria). We tested all CSF isolates from patients with bacterial meningitis caused by the three predominant pathogens. Whenever a particular CSF isolate was no longer available for testing, the blood isolate from the same patient was taken as a substitute. Furthermore, we tested all 302 N. meningitidis strains isolated from blood only. We considered all patients with meningococcal disease important for the purpose of this study, as it is often difficult to make a distinction between septicaemia and meningitis. In Table I the number of isolates obtained per year and age categories of patients are given. Table I. Source of tested isolates and age category of patients (number of isolates) Specimen by year CSF 1993 1994 blood 1993 1994 patient age (years) (M 5-16 >17 H. influenzae 202 114 290 11 15 N. meningitidis 484 348 154 139 354 513 258 S. pneumoniae 203 195 106 40 252

Antimicrobial susceptibility in meningitis 779 The identity of all isolates was confirmed upon receipt using standard procedures. Isolates were stored at 70 C in glycerol-based medium on plastic beads. One or two beads were removed from stock cultures, and subcultured onto chocolate blood agar plates (H. influenzae and N. meningitidis) or blood agar plates {S. pneumoniae) and incubated for 18-24 h at 35 C in air with 5% CO 2. Quality control (QC) strains used in this study were Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, H. influenzae ATCC 49247 and S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, 1993). No N. meningitidis QC strain is available. QC testing was performed daily for 30 days and then weekly. Serogroup and/or serotype determination Serotyping of H. influenzae isolates was performed by co-agglutination using in-house raised polyclonal rabbit antisera (Campos, 1995). Serogrouping of meningococci was performed by immunodiffusion using in-house raised polyclonal rabbit antisera (Slaterus, 1961). Serotyping was done by whole cell ELISA using a set of seven monoclonal antibodies, and subtyping by using a set of 12 monoclonal antibodies obtained from the RIVM (Bilthoven, The Netherlands) (Abdillahi & Poolman, 1987). Serotyping of S. pneumoniae isolates was performed by the capsular swelling method (Quellung reaction) with antisera obtained from the Statens Serum Institut (Copenhagen, Denmark). Susceptibility testing In the Reference Laboratory, /?-lactamase production by H. influenzae strains is determined upon the receipt of a strain by the nitrocephin assay. Penicillin-susceptibility of meningococci is determined by inoculating strains on chocolate agar containing 0.1 mg/l penicillin. Penicillin-resistance in pneumococci is determined using a 1 /ig oxacillin disc. Etest strips were provided by AB Biodisk (Solna, Sweden). The inoculation procedure described by NCCLS (1993) was used. Briefly, inocula were prepared by suspending bacteria in phosphate-buffered saline to achieve a turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard. A sterile, cotton swab was dipped into the bacterial suspension and the entire surface of an agar plate was swabbed four times, resulting in a confluent lawn of growth. For H. influenzae we used Haemophilus Test Medium agar, for meningococci 5% chocolate Mueller-Hinton agar, and for S. pneumoniae strains Mueller-Hinton 5%-sheep blood agar. All plates were incubated for 18-24 h at 35 C in 5% CO 2, The MIC value was read where bacterial growth intersected the Etest strip. QC strains were tested in the same way. For calculation of the MICJO and the MIG» the actual MICs as determined by the Etest were used. For determination of the susceptibility category (susceptible/intermediately resistant/resistant), the Etest results were rounded up to the nearest two-fold dilution value as recommended by the manufacturer. Choice of antimicrobial agents and evaluation criteria The choice of antibiotics was determined by the current treatment regimens used in The Netherlands for meningitis and can be found in Table II (Roord, 1989). Antimicrobial

780 R. H. Enting et al. H. influenzae ampicillin ceftriaxone chloramphenicol N. meningiiidis penicillin ceftnaxone chloramphenicol rifampicin S. pneumoniae penicillin ceftriaxone chloramphenicol Table II. Criteria for susceptibility test interpretation Susceptible <,\ <;2 <.2 ^0.06 ^0.25 <,2 <;1 ^0.06 ^0.25 <,4 Intermediate resistant 2 4 0.1-1 0.5-1 4 2 0.1-1 0.5-1 8 Resistant >4 8 2 2 S8 >4 ^2 S2 ;>16 agent concentrations ranged 0.016-256 mg/l for chloramphenicol and ampicillin and 0.002-32 mg/l for penicillin, rifampicin and ceftriaxone. The MIC criteria used for the Etest were those used for microorganisms tested by dilution susceptibility test methods (NCCLS, 1993) (Table II). For meningococcal isolates, criteria for susceptibility to penicillin and rifampicin have been suggested elsewhere (Jones & Sutcliffe, 1990; Jackson et al., 1994), and results for chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone were interpreted according to the strictest NCCLS (1993) criteria for other microorganisms. Statistical analysis The following data were available: year and month of isolation, hospital, site of isolation, age and sex of patient, organism serogroup/serotype and susceptibility pattern to penicillin and /Mactamase production. Medians were calculated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 6.0 for Windows and comparisons of proportions were calculated using CIA (Confidence Interval Analysis) (Gardner & Altman, 1989). Susceptibility testing Results Seven meningococcal strains were either lost or could not be subcultured. All other strains were available for testing. Routine susceptibility testing upon receipt of the isolates revealed that 30 (9.5%) H, influenzae strains produced /Mactamase and 10 (0.9%) meningococcal strains had intermediate susceptibility to penicillin. No penicillin-resistant (1.0/ig oxacillin disc) pneumococci were isolated. By Etest results, 7% of H. influenzae isolates were resistant to ampicillin, 2.2% to chloramphenicol and 1% to both (Table III). N. meningitidis isolates (Table IV) were intermediately resistant to penicillin in 3.3% of cases. The only blood isolate which was highly resistant (MIC > 256 mg/l) to rifampicin was susceptible to penicillin. Resistance among 5. pneumoniae isolates (Table V) occurred in less than 1%.

Antimicrobial susceptibility in meningitis 781 Table III. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 316 CSF isolates of//, influenzae (1993-1994) as determined by Etest Antimicrobial agent Ampicillin children' adults Ceftriaxone Chloramphenicol children* adults MICo 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.003 0.25 MIU, (mg/l) 0.25 0.25 0.003 Number (%) of strains intermediate 20 (6.3) 20 (6.6) 7 (2.2) 7 (2.3) resistant high 2 (0.6) 2 (0.7) "Mean difference (MD) of prevalence of ampicillin resistance between children and adults is 7.3% (95% CI 4.4-10.2%). 'MD of prevalence of chloramphenicol resistance between children and adults is 2.3% (95% CI 0.6-4.0%). A discrepancy between routine susceptibility testing and the Etest was found in ten H. influenzae strains: one /Mactamase negative strain was found to be ampicillin-resistant and 9/30 /Mactamase producing strains had Etest MICs of ampicillin in the susceptible range. As different criteria were used for the routine testing of meningococci and pneumococci, results cannot be similarly compared with the Etest. The distributions of Etest MICs of penicillin, ampicillin and chloramphenicol for the appropriate bacteria are shown in Figure (a)-(c), respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility according to serogroup and serotype Twenty-two of 298 H. influenzae type b strains (7.4%) were resistant to ampicillin, whilst none of 18 non-type b strains were similarly resistant (mean difference 7.4%, 95% CI: 4.4%-10.4%). The overall N. meningitidis distribution showed that 83%, were serogroup B and 15% serogroup C, and of intermediate resistant strains 30 (81%) were serogroup B and 7 (18%) serogroup C. Four strains were identified as B:4:P1.15, while this subtype represents only 4% of all serogroup B cases. The main serotypes of S. pneumoniae isolates were serotype 14 and 23F (each 8.9%), type 6B (8.7%), 18C (8.4%) and 19F (8.2%). Intermediate penicillin-resistant strains were of serotype 23F (1/35) and 35B (1/1), and the intermediate chloramphenicol-resistant strain belonged to serogroup 8 (1/9). Table IV. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 293 blood and 832 CSF isolates of N. meningitidis (1993-1994) as determined by Etest Antimicrobial agent Penicillin Ceftriaxone Chloramphenicol Rifampicin MIC M 0.032 < 0.002 0.75 0.012 MIC«(mg/L) 0.047 < 0.002 1.0 0.032 Number (%) of strains intermediate 37 (3.3) resistant high 1 (0.1)

782 R. H. Enting et al. Table V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 398 CSF isolates of 5. pneumoniae (1993-1994) as determined by Etest Number (%) of resistant Antimicrobial MICjo MIC strains agent (mg/l) intermediate high Penicillin 0.016 0.023 2 (0.5) Ceftriaxone 0.016 0.023 Chloramphenicol 1.5 3.0 1 (0.3) Antibiotic susceptibility according to source CSF isolates of N. meningitidis were penicillin resistant in 2.9% of cases as compared with 4.4% of blood isolates. (P > 0.05) One blood isolate was highly resistant to rifampicin. MIC w s of all tested antibiotics were identical for blood and CSF isolates (data not shown). Antibiotic susceptibility according to age of patients H. influenzae isolates from children were significantly more often ampicillin resistant compared with those from adults (Table III). All resistant strains were isolated from children <4 years of age. For A', meningitidis isolates, no age differences in the prevalence of antibiotic resistance were found. MIC50S of all antibiotics were identical for both age groups (data not shown). Antibiotic susceptibility according to year of receipt No significant differences were found in the percentages of resistant strains from 1993 compared with 1994. Discussion Ampicillin resistance was found in 7.0% of H. influenzae isolates according to the Etest and 9.5% according to /?-lactamase production. Resistance to chloramphenicol was noted in 2.2% of isolates. Resistance to chloramphenicol was associated with resistance to ampicillin in 0.9% of strains. These findings are similar to prevalences among isolates from different types of specimen in nine European countries (1988-89) and South Africa (1991-92) (Kayser, Morenzoni & Santanam, 1990; Hussey et al., 1994). In the USA ampicillin resistance in H. influenzae occurred twice as often, yet chloramphenicol resistance was rare (Doern et al., 1988). A significantly higher prevalence of ampicillin resistance was found among our type b as compared with non-type b strains. This was also seen in the USA, but not in previous studies from Europe and South Africa (Doern et al., 1988; Kayser et al., 1990; Hussey et al., 1994). One study mentioned highest rates of ampicillin resistance among children aged less than 5 years, comparable to our findings (Doern et al., 1988). As the outcome of patients with H. influenzae meningitis caused by strains which were resistant to initial therapy consisting of ampicillin and chloramphenicol appeared to be worse in one study, this regimen cannot be recommended now for H. influenzae meningitis in The Netherlands (Campos et al., 1986).

Antimicrobial susceptibility in meningitis 783 400 100 0.006 0.012 0.023 0.047 0.094 0.19 160 I 0.025 0.047 0.094 0.19 0.75 500 r (c) 400-300- 200-300- 200-100- 0.094 0.19 0.75 MIC'mg/hi! IA I 1 ll I! h. I I I J I - Figure. Distributions of MICs of penicillin (a), ampicillin (b) and chloramphenicol (c) for appropriate meningitis pathogens in The Netherlands (1993-94). (a) 0, M meningitidis (n = 1125);, S. pneumoniae (n = 398); (b), H. influenzae, (n = 316); (c) H, H. influenzae (n = 316); 0, N. meningiiidis = (n1125),, S. pneumoniae (n = 398). 1.5

784 R. H. Enting et at. Analysis of our N. meningitidis isolates revealed an overall prevalence of intermediate penicillin resistance of 3.3%, comparable to prevalences found in the UK (1980s), USA (1991), and Canada (1991-1992), but far lower than the 20-40% prevalence in Spain (1989-1990) (Jones & Sutcliffe, 1990; Saez-Nieto et al., 1992; Jackson et al., 1994; Ringuette et al., 1995). Among our intermediately resistant strains, serogroup B:4:P1.15 was relatively often present, as found in Spain (Saez-Nieto et al., 1992). Penicillin is still regarded as first choice for the treatment of meningococcal meningitis with intermediate resistant strains (Jones & Sutcliffe, 1990). Secondary cases caused by failure of rifampicin chemoprophylaxis have been reported (Yagupsky, Ashkenazi & Block, 1993), but as only 0.1% of our strains were rifampicin resistant, chemoprophylaxis with this antibiotic is still applicable in The Netherlands. Resistance to penicillin or chloramphenicol in S. pneumoniae CSF isolates was very rare. With the recently suggested change in Etest (penicillin) susceptibility categories for pneumococci, 6 (1.5%) strains would be classified as intermediately resistant, and none as resistant (Scheel et al., 1995). The rare occurrence of resistance cannot be explained by a different serodistribution compared with other regions, as the four serogroups known for high rates of resistance (6, 14, 19, 23) represent 40% of CSF isolates in The Netherlands (Appelbaum, 1992; Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (RIVM/UvA), 1994). A more likely explanation is that in The Netherlands antibiotics are available by prescription only, and guidelines recommending restricted use of antibiotics in various bacterial infections are widely used. In fact, the prevalence of resistance found in our pneumococcal CSF isolates is among the lowest in the world. In adjacent countries, the prevalences of penicillin resistance in CSF and blood isolates were 4.3% (Belgium, 1986-1993) and 1.8% (Germany, 1992-94) as compared with 0.5% in our isolates. Chloramphenicol resistance was found in 2.7% and 1.9% of isolates from Belgium and Germany, respectively, as compared with 0.3% of isolates in this study (Reinert et al., 1995; Verhaegen et al., 1995). The prevalence of penicillin resistance in CSF isolates was 40% and 25% in Spain (1979-89) and France (1993), respectively; 25% of isolates were chloramphenicol resistant (Fenoll et al., 1991; Linares et al., 1992; Olivier et al., 1994). In a recent population-based surveillance of invasive pneumococcal infections in the USA 25% of isolates were resistant to penicillin and 3% to chloramphenicol. (Hofmann et al., 1995). The findings in the present study do not justify a change in initial therapy of presumptive pneumococcal meningitis. We found a disturbingly high discrepancy (30%) between the results of the /Mactamase assay and ampicillin Etest in /Mactamase producing H. influenzae strains. One study mentioned a 7% prevalence of discrepancy between MIC results and the nitrocephin assay among resistant strains (Kayser et al., 1990). A discrepancy is often explained by the fact that /Mactamase producing strains yield inhibition ellipses which may be difficult to interpret (Jorgensen et al., 1991). After evaluation of our observed Etest results, we found that by using a tentative cut-off MIC of 0.75 mg/l, only 2/30 /Mactamase-positive strains would have been missed, while only one more strain would have been classified as /Mactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant. Several conclusions may be drawn regarding empirical therapy in bacterial meningitis. In childhood (4 months-4 years) bacterial meningitis in The Netherlands a distinction should be made between children who have been vaccinated with the H. influenzae type b vaccine and children who have not been immunized. In the first group, only sporadic cases of non-type b H. influenzae meningitis will occur. As no resistant

Antimicrobial susceptibility in meningitis 785 non-type b isolates were found in this study, amoxycillin monotherapy may become the first-line treatment in vaccinated children. For non-vaccinated children, a switch to a third generation cephalosporin is warranted because H. influenzae type b meningitis caused by strains resistant to both compounds of standard treatment may occur. Bacterial meningitis in older children (;>5 years) and adults caused by H. influenzae occurs in less than 3% of cases and no resistant CSF isolates were detected in patients over the age of 4 years. On the other hand, meningitis due to Listeria monocytogenes occurs in about 2% and this bacterium is resistant to cephalosporins (Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (RIVM/UvA), 1994, 1995). Therefore, empirical therapy with amoxycillin or penicillin, and not a cephalosporin, is preferable in community-acquired bacterial meningitis in older children or adults. Acknowledgements We thank AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden, and Hoffmann-La Roche, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands for financial support. References Abdillahi, H. & Poolman, J. T. (1987). Whole-cell ELISA for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiology Letters 48, 367-71. Appelbaum, P. C. (1992). Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: an overview. Clinical Infectious Diseases 15, 77-83. Campos, J., Garcia-Tornel, S., Gairi, J. M. & Fabregues, I. (1986). Multiply resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b causing meningitis: comparative clinical and laboratory study. Journal of Pediatrics 108, 897-902. Campos, J. M. (1995). Haemophilus. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 5th edn (Murray, P. R., Baron, E. J., Pfaller, M. A., Tenover, F. C. & Yolken, R. H., Eds), pp. 556-65. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. Doern, G. V., Jorgensen, J. H., Thornsberry, C, Preston, D. A., Tubert, T., Redding, J. S. el al. (1988). National collaborative study of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32, 180-5. Fenoll, A., Bourgon, C. M., Munoz, R., Viciosa, D. & Casal, J. (1991). Serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing systemic infections in Spain, 1979-1989. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 13, 56-60. Gardner, M. J. & Altman, D. G. (1989). Calculating confidence intervals for proportions and their differences. In Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines, (Gardner, M. J. & Altman, D. G., Eds.), pp. 28-33. British Medical Journal, London. Hofmann, J., Cetron, M. S., Farley, M. M., Baughman, W. S., Facklam, R. R., Elliott, J. A. el al. (1995). The prevalence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Atlanta. New England Journal of Medicine 333, 481-6. Hughes, J. H., Biedenbach, D. J., Erwin, M. E. & Jones, R. N. (1993). E test as susceptibility test and epidemiologic tool for evaluation of Neisseria meningitidis isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31, 3255-9. Hussey, G., Hitchcock, J., Hanslo, D., Coetzee, G., Van Schalkwyk, E., Pitout, J. et al. (1994). Serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 34, 1031-6. Jackson, L. A., Tenover, F. C, Baker, C, Plikaytis, B. D., Reeves, M. W., Stocker, S. A. et al. (1994). Prevalence of Neisseria meningitidis relatively resistant to penicillin in the United States, 1991. Journal of Infectious Diseases 169, 438-41. Jones, D. M. & Sutcliffe, E. M. (1990). Meningococci with reduced susceptibility to penicillin. Lancet 335, 863-4.

786 R. H. Enting et al. Jorgensen, J. H., Ferraro, M. J., McElmeel, M. L., Spargo, J., Swenson, J. M. & Tenover, F. C. (1994). Detection of penicillin and extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates by use of the E test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 32, 159-63. Jorgensen, J. H., Howell, A. W. & Maher, L. A. (1991). Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilns influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29, 109-14. Kayser, F. H., Morenzoni, G. & Santanam, P. (1990). The Second European Collaborative Study on the frequency of antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 9, 810 7. Lambert, H. P (1994). Meningitis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgerv, and Psvchiatrv 57, 405-15. Linares, J., Pallares, R., Alonso, T., Perez, J. L., Ayats, J., Gudiol, R. et al. (1992). Trends in antimicrobial resistance of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Bellvitge hospital, Barcelona, Spain (1979-1990). Clinical Infectious Diseases 15, 99-105. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1993). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Third Edition: Approved Standard M7-A3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA. Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (RIVM/UvA) (1994). Bacterial Meningitis in The Netherlands; Annual Report 1993. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (RIVM/UvA) (1995). Bacterial Meningitis in The Netherlands; Annual Report 1994. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Olivier, C, Thibault, H., Cohen, R., Astruc, J. & Begue, P. (1994). S. pneumoniae meningitis in children: Clinical aspects, treatment, influence of penicillin resistance. In Program and Abstracts of the Thirty-Fourth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Orlando, Florida, 1994. Abstract C16, pp. 85. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. Reinert, R. R., Queck, A., Kaufhold, A., Kresken, M. & Lutticken, R. (1995). Antimicrobial resistance and type distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing systemic infections in Germany, 1992-1994. Clinical Infectious Diseases 21, 1398^401. Ringuette, L., Lorange, M., Ryan, A. & Ashton, F. (1995). Meningococcal infections in the province of Quebec, Canada, during the period 1991 to 1992. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33, 53-7. Roord, J. J. (1989). Richtlijnen bacteriele meningitis bij kinderen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 133, 831 4. Saez-Nieto, J. A., Lujan, R., Berron, S, Campos, J., Vinas, M., Fuste, C. et al. (1992). Epidemiology and molecular basis of penicillin-resistant Neisseria menmgitidis in Spain: a 5-year history (1985-1989). Clinical Infectious Diseases 14, 394-402. Scheel, O., Lyon, D. J., Tsang, D. N. C, Hoel, T. & Cheng, A. F. B. (1995). Misclassification of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae by the use of the E test. In Program and Abstracts of the Thirty-Fifth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, California, 1995. Abstract D14. pp. 69. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. Slaterus, K. W. (1961). Serological typing of meningococci by means of micro-precipitation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 27, 305 15. Verhaegen, J., Glupczynski, Y., Verbist, L., Blogie, M., Verbiest, N., Vandeven, J. et al. (1995). Capsular types and antibiotic susceptibility of pneumococci isolated from patients in Belgium with serious infections, 1980-1993. Clinical Infectious Diseases 20, 1339-45. Yagupsky, P., Ashkenazi, S. & Block, C. (1993). Rifampicin-resistant meningococci causing invasive disease and failure of chemoprophylaxis. Lancet 341, 1152-3. (Received 11 January 1996; returned 4 March 1996; revised 20 March 1996; accepted 10 June 1996)