Clinical and Bacteriological Evaluation of Netilmicin in Gram-Negative Infections

Similar documents
Comparison of Sisomicin and Gentamicin in Bacteriuric

In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin

Antibiotics in Gram-Negative Infections

Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

of Staphylococcus aureus

Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates

Discrepancy Between Carbenicillin and Ampicillin Activities Against Enterococci and Listeria

available. and P. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin by standardized disk testing (1) in the Microbiology Laboratory

Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci

Synergy Between Cephalosporin and Aminoglycoside

GENTAMICIN: ACTIVITY IN VITRO AGAINST GRAMNEGATIVE ORGANISMS AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCES IN THE TREATMENT OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS

Staphylococcus aureus

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

VOL. XXIII NO. II THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 559. ANTIBIOTIC 6640.* Ill

University, New York, New York Received for publication 7 May was measured by the broth dilution method as previously

Disk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin

Efficacy of Ceftriaxone in Serious Bacterial Infections

Protein Synthesis Inhibitors

Endotracheal Antibiotics for the Prevention of Tracheobronchial Infections in Tracheotomized Unconscious Patients*

Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Against Cephalothin-Resistant

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage

Emergence of Gentamicin- and Carbenicillin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Hospital Environment

Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Prospective Comparative Study of Efficacy and Toxicity of Netilmicin and Amikacin

Activity of Three Aminoglycosides and Two Penicillins Against

Tobramycin. Received for publication 5 December 1974

Comparison of Clindamycin, Erythromycin, and Methicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Susceptibility Testing

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Experimental Pseudomonas Bacteremia in Neutropenic Rats

Pharmacokinetic & Pharmadynamic of Once Daily Aminoglycosides (ODA) and their Monitoring. Janis Chan Pharmacist, UCH 2008

Effeet on Bacterial Growth

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

Combination antibiotic therapy: comparison of constant infusion and intermittent bolus dosing in an experimental animal model

Tel: Fax:

Health Products Regulatory Authority

Persistent in Kidneys

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Effects of Minocycline and Other Antibiotics on Fusobacterium necrophorum Infections in Mice

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli

Standing Orders for the Treatment of Outpatient Peritonitis

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare the susceptibility of 297 strains of anaerobic and a new broad-spectrum semisynthetic

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

MARBOCYL FD SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

MIACIN HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS

Cost high. acceptable. worst. best. acceptable. Cost low

Standing Orders for the Treatment of Outpatient Peritonitis

Mechanism of Chloramphenicol-Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae

Patients. Excludes paediatrics, neonates.

Principles of Anti-Microbial Therapy Assistant Professor Naza M. Ali. Lec 1

Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

Bacterial skin and soft tissues infections (SSTI) are one of the most common 1. infections among different age groups

Susceptibility Tests for Methicillin-Resistant (Heteroresistant) Staphylococci

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing

Introduction to Chemotherapeutic Agents. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The university of Jordan November 2018

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Central Nervous System Infections

RELIABLE AND REALISTIC APPROACH TO SENSITIVITY TESTING

Similar to Penicillins: -Chemically. -Mechanism of action. -Toxicity.

1 TRADE NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT. Gentamicin Paediatric 20mg/2ml Solution for Injection 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

R-factor mediated trimethoprim resistance: result of two three-month clinical surveys

USA Product Label CLINTABS TABLETS. Virbac. brand of clindamycin hydrochloride tablets. ANADA # , Approved by FDA DESCRIPTION

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI ISOLATES AMONG DIFFERENT CLINICAL SAMPLES FROM A DIAGNOSTIC CENTER OF KANPUR

Author - Dr. Josie Traub-Dargatz

Therios 300 mg and 750 mg Palatable Tablets for Dogs

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Cephacare flavour 50 mg tablets for cats and dogs. Excipients: For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

ANTIBIOTICS USED FOR RESISTACE BACTERIA. 1. Vancomicin

Treatment of Gram-negative infections in patients before and after

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

Jerome J Schentag, Pharm D

مادة االدوية المرحلة الثالثة م. غدير حاتم محمد

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

Therapy of Staphylococcal Infections in Monkeys

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Staphylococcus aureus with the Disc

Considerations in antimicrobial prescribing Perspective: drug resistance

MICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ

A retrospective analysis of urine culture results issued by the microbiology department, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya

Scottish Medicines Consortium

IN VITRO COMBINATION EFFECTS OF NORFLOXACIN, GENTAMICIN, AND Ĉ- LACTAMS ON Ĉ- LACTAM RESISTANT PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA

Acquired and Native Resistance of Staphylococcus

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Transcription:

ANTrxcRoBAL AG rnts AND CHEMOTHERAPY, OCt. 1977, p. 53-59 Copyright 1977 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 12, No. 4 Printed in U.S.A. Clinical and Bacteriological Evaluation of Netilmicin in Gram-Negative nfections J. KLASTERSKY,* F. MEUNEER-CARPENTER, L. COPPENS-KAHAN, D. DANEAU, An J. M. PREVOST Service de Medecine etlaboratoire d'nvestigation Clinique H. J. Tagnon (Section des Maladies nfectieuses), nstitut Jules Bordet, Centre des Tumeurs de l'universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium Received for publication 18 April 1977 A preliminary study was conducted with netilmicin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic. ts effectiveness was evaluated in vitro against 546 strains ofenterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical material. ts effectiveness against gentamicin-susceptible strains was roughly similar to that of gentamicin and other newer aminoglycoside antibiotics. Cross-resistance to netilmicin was found in 9 of 44 gentamicin-resistant strains. A favorable clinical response was observed in 7% of the patients treated with a dose of netilmicin ranging from 4.5 to 7.5 mg/kg. However, the appearance of granular casts was seen in 7 of 1 patients receiving the higher dosage of netilmicin (7.5 mg/kg) and a rise in blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine levels was observed in 5 ofthese patients. Netilmicin is a new semisynthetic aminoglycoside antibiotic that is active in vitro against a They were identified by the usual methods. The from sputum, urine, wounds, and blood cultures. wide variety of gram-negative bacteria. This minimum inhibitory concentrations (MCs) were determined for each aminoglycoside by the inocula new compound is derived from sisomicin by ethylation of the N position ofthe deoxystreptamine ring. ing approximately 14 microorganisms per ml. The replicating method of Steers et al. (15) on a Mueller- Hinton medium (ph 7.4), with an inoculum contain- For most clinically significant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the activ- n addition, the cross-resistance between genta- reading was made after 18 h of incubation at 37 C. ity of netilmicin in vitro was comparable or micin and the other aminoglycosides studied was superior to that of gentamicin, tobramycin, and investigated in the microorganisms resistant to gentamicin. All microorganisms that were resistant to amikacin with respect to potency by weight and achievable blood levels. Against gentamicinresistant strains, the activity of netilmicin usu- netilmicin, and amikacin were also resistant to gen- one or more of the antibiotics sisomicin, tobramycin, ally paralleled that of amikacin (3). These in tamicin. Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and netilmicin was defined by an MC of -6 vitro studies were repeated here using the Zg/ml. Resistance to amikacin was defined by an strains isolated from clinical material in our MC of a12,ug/ml. Similar techniques were used to hospital, with special attention to gentamicinresistant strains. No reports of clinical experi- patients who had been included in the clinical study. determine the MC of the bacteria isolated from the ence with netilmicin have yet been published; Serum was obtained from most patients 1 and 6 h that is why the present investigation was undertaken as an increasing-dose trial. days after the onset of the treatment. These sera after the administration of netilmicin on various were tested for bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against the organism responsible for the infec- MATERLALS AND METHODS tion in each case: a suspension of these microorganisms (approximately 15 per ml) in Trypticase soy Bacteriological studies. All the aminoglycosides (gentamicin, sisomicin, tobramycin, netilmigin, broth was added to serial twofold dilutions of the amikacin) were supplied as sterile powders by the sera. The highest dilution that failed to show evidence of macroscopic growth was considered to rep- respective manufacturers. Dilutions were prepared in Trypticase soy broth (Difco). The microorganisms resent the bacteriostatic end point. Clear tubes were examined comprised 163 strains of Klebsiella, 58 plated on blood agar plates and incubated for 18 h at strains ofproteus mirabilis, 21 strains ofenterobacter, 178 strains ofescherichia coli, and 94 strains of Assays for the concentration of netilmicin were 37 C to determine the bactericidal activity. P. aeruginosa. All these gram-negative rods were performed by the cup-plate technique (2), with a isolated from patients who were hospitalied at the strain of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to penicillin and clindamycin as the test microorganism and nstitut Bordet, which is the cancer hospital of Brussels University. The microorganisms were isolated Mueller-Hinton agar. 53 Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

54 KLASTERSKY ET AL. Clinical studies. The clinical studies were carried out on three dosage groups of ten patients each. All were hospitalied at the nstitut Jules Bordet. Depending on which group they were in, these patients received a daily dose of 4.5, 6., and 7.5 mg of netilmicin per kg. Most patients had metastatic carcinoma. The types of infections varied among the different groups and were considered to be caused primarily by gramnegative bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa), all of which were susceptible in vitro to netilmicin. Occasionally, other bacteria were isolated from the sites of infection (most often Streptococcus sp. or Bacteroides sp.), and penicillin or clindamycin was used in those patients in addition to netilmicin. No patient in the present series received concomitant therapy with antibiotics other than those mentioned above, except that one patient received cephalothin in addition to netilmicin for an infection caused by P. aeruginosa. Another patient received methicillin instead of penicillin. t should be stressed that most infections in this series were complicated by underlying factors. Urinary tract infections occurred in patients with obstructive uropathies or tumors of the urinary tract; all these patients received surgical attention to relieve the obstruction of the urinary tract and achieve better drainage. However, as might be expected, major anatomical alterations resulting from extensive tumors or previous surgery could not always be corrected. Wound infections usually complicated postoperative lesions or tumors, and patients with pulmonary infections usually had tracheostomy or bronchial carcinoma. nfection was considered to be present when a potential pathogen was seen along with abundant polymorphonuclear neutrophils on Gram-stained films and was recovered repeatedly as the only or predominant microorganism from urine (more than 1, organisms per ml were required), tracheal secretions, or pus from wounds, in addition to clinical signs such as fever, hyperleukocytosis, leukocyturia, pulmonary infiltrates, etc., suggesting real infection rather than mere bacterial coloniation. Clinical cure was considered to exist when the initial clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection disappeared or markedly improved during therapy. Bacteriological cure was considered to have been obtained when the offending microorganism had been eradicated. Bacterial coloniation was defied as the presence of large numbers of a potential pathogen, resistant to netilmicin, in cultures of sputum, urine (counts of 21, microorganisms per ml), or wounds after therapy with netilmicin was started but without any clinical signs of infection. n most patients in this study, cultures of the tracheobronchial secretions, urine, and wounds (when present) were carried out before and on days 3 and 6 of treatment, as well as after its discontinuation. Similarly, complete hematological evaluation, examination of the urinary sediment, and determi- ANTiMCEOB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. nation of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic tr inases were performed before, during, and after therapy. Creatinine clearances were obtained in many patients included in the present series. Surveillance of the auditory and vestibular functions was accomplished by daily questioning of the patients on hearing, vertigo, diiness, and headache. Romberg's test, Rinne's test (tuning fork), and the watch test were carried out daily in most patients. Audiograms were obtained in most patients before, during, and after therapy with netilmicin. RESULTS As, indicated in Fig. 1, among 163 strains of Klebsiella species, 5% showed MCs for the five aminoglycosides between.1 and.2 gg/ ml. These differences are small; on the other hand, the MCs necessary to kill 9% of strains (MC8) for Klebsiella were lower for netilmicin, tobramycin, and amikacin (MC between.2 and.6,ug/ml) than for sisomicin (MCgo = 6,g/ml) and for gentamicin (MC,o = 2,ug/ml). This figure shows also that more than 9% of the strains of Klebsiella were susceptible to netilmicin, sisomicin, tobramycin, and amikacin, whereas only 75% were susceptible to gentamicin. The results obtained with the 21 strains of Enterobacter (Fig. 2) indicate a difference among the antibiotics tested here. Netilmicin, tobramycin, and amikacin were very active: 1% of the strains were inhibited by.7,ug of netilmicin or tobramycin per ml and by 3 ug of amikacin per ml. On the other hand, sisomicin and gentamicin showed decreased activity: 85% of the strains of Enterobacter had a sisomicin ~- R 9 A Q8 LD 7. ' 3f 5. 4i/ 2 1_GNA 5t / GEN5AMCN 16O,' 4 O.- 11 ~~~~~~2.NETLMCN uil 4 3..TOBRAMYCN > ui;, 4-~~~~~~&SSOMCN ui 3, 5-AMKACN < 2/ v 1 <47J5,3? 1.5 3i 6 25 5 1 2 >2 MNMUM NHBTORY CONCENTRATON (pg/ml) FG. 1. Susceptibility of 163 strains of Kkbsiella sp. to netilmicin and to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and amikacin. Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

VOL. 12, 1977 9. F7. Z ZLB,. / 2NTL U. 6. / ui L ' E., _RAY.GENTAMCN Z uj A- oic3, F -j2. D 4i 1, 2 3 5_AA MNMUM NHBlTOR 2-.NETLMCN C3TOBRAMYCN &-SSOMCN 5AMKACN <W7Jl5 3 L.5 36 12 25 5 1 2 > MNMUM NHBTORY CONCENTRATON (pug/ml) FG. 2. Susceptibility of2l strains ofenterobacter sp. to netilmicin and to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and amikacin. MC of 6 ug/ml and 47% had a gentamicin MC of 6 ug/ml. Figure 3 shows the susceptibility of 58 strains of P. mirabilis to the five aminoglycosides. These microorganisms were very susceptible to the drugs tested here: 1% of the Proteus strains were inhibited by.7,ug of sisomicin, tobramycin, gentamicin, and netilmicin per ml, and 3 ug of amikacin per ml also inhibited 1% of these microorganisms. Figure 4 compares the activity of the five aminoglycosides on 178 strains ofe. coli; all the antibiotics tested appeared to be effective: 9% of the microorganisms showed MCs of <1,ug/ ml. There was no major difference among them; however, netilmicin seemed slightly more active than the others. Figure 5 represents the results for P. aeruginosa (94 strains). The curves obtained for sisomicin and tobramycin are displaced to the left as compared with those obtained for gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmicin. However, all five aminoglycosides can be considered as active, since 95% ofthe strains showed MCs of less than 6,ug/ml; 95% ofthep. aeruginosa strains had sisomicin and tobramycin MCs equal to.7 jug/ml, and 65% of the strains showed MCs lower than.7,ug/ml. The cross-resistance to the various aminoglycosides was examined for 546 strains (Table 1). Forty-four strains (8%) were found to be resistant to gentamicin. No strain was resistant to any of the other aminoglycosides unless it was resistant to gentamicin as well. Among these resistant strains, 2 (45.4%) were Klebsiella NETLMCN N GRAM-NEGATVE NFECTONS 55 sp.; as a matter of fact, 2 (12.2%) of 163 strains ofklebsiella were resistant to gentamicin. The proportion of gentamicin-resistant microorganisms was also high among Enterobacter sp. (38.1%) and Serratia marcescens strains (26.3%). No strain of Proteus was found to be resistant to gentamicin. Most strains (9.9%) resistant to gentamicin were also resistant to sisomicin. Resistance to S i 9. n w 7. u- 66- Lu n o 5. 4 UJw1 AL 3. 4 2. i n 1. 1_ GENTAMCN 2_ NETLMCN 3 _TOBRAMYCN 4 SSOMCN 5_ AMKACN OJ5 3 7 1.5 3 6 12 25 5 1 2 >2 MNMUM NHBTORY CONCENTRATON (pg/ml) FG. 3. Susceptibility of58 strains ofproteus mirabilis to netilmicin and to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and amikacin. 1. :i 9. n so. s 7. n U) 6. C, 4 5..- uj -i 4. u) 3.!a -' 2. c- 1. <Q7 J5 2;,,, 1! S2,~~~~~~--,? GENTAMCN /, 2_ NETLMCN :. 3 TOBRAMYCN 'SSOMCN 4 5_ AMKACN Q3 7 15 3 6 12 25 5 1 2 >2 MNMUM NHBTORY CONCENTRATON (yg/ml) FG. 4. Susceptibility of 178 strains of E. coli to netilmicin and to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and amikacin. Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

56 KLASTERSKY ET AL. ANTimCROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHE: so ~74( ++ + + ocqec O o= V ko cd co Z 6 / 1 GENTAMCN o / Z 2. NEJLMCN 'u 5 3-TOBRAMYCN CD 4 / / 4..SSOMCN L/ Lu Lcu 3. w 2 n 1 5_AMKACN <7 Q5 2 7.5 3 6 12 25 5 1 2 >2 MNMUM NHBTORY CONCENTRATON,UG/ML) FG. 5. Susceptibility of 94 strains of P. aeruginosa to netilmicin and to gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and amikacin. gentamicin and to one or several other aminoglycosides was found for approximately 1% of the strains; three strains (.5%) were resistant to all the aminoglycosides tested here. A favorable clinical response was observed in 21 (7%) of the patients included in this series; as summaried in Table 2, no clear relationship between the dosage and the frequency of favorable responses could be observed. The offending pathogen was eliminated from the site of the infection in 16 (53%) patients, more often (7/1) when the highest dose of netilmicin had been given than with the lowest dose (4/1). The coloniation of the original site of infection by a resistant microorganism occurred three times in this series: the microorganisms responsible for it were S. marcescens, Herrellea sp., and Bacteroides sp. and were not responsible for a new clinical infection. The type of infection did not influence the frequency with which a favorable response was observed. nfection arising in surgical wounds responded favorably in 12 of 16 patients (75%); with urinary tract infections and bronchopulmonary infections, the favorable response was observed in 2 of 3 and in 3 of 4 patients, respectively. nfections associated with bacteremia responded in 5 of 11 patients (45%). No clear relationship between the dosage and the outcome could be observed in these various subgroups, but it is recognied that the numbers of patients in these subgroups are very small. All the infections due to Klebsiella-Entero- -Me C.E C. W a 1 C.) C. "4 c) C..a.H 3 C.) 8.41it E- + + E- E-4 6q E- P 3, 3, + _ 3Q C C l O O O Coes oo - -4_Oc O Cq O O O C4 CA Q Q _ 3CDO CA -OCoCG 4 OC O4 c - t. C- '-- 4 1 - - C o 1 ē co CD 9- co CD C.- - CO S..2 A 2-. 'H * - ',d X9 6 & 9 Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

VOL. 12, 1977 NETLMCN N GRAM-NEGATVE NFECTONS 57 TABL 2. Relationship between dosage and frequency of clinical and microbiological responses and that of adverse effects Daily dose of netilmicin (mg/kg) Criterion Total (%) 4.5 6. 7.5 No. of patients 1 1 1 3 (1) Favorable clinical response 7 6 8 21 (7) Elimination of pathogen 4 5 7 16 (53) Bacterial coloniation 1 1 1 3 (1) Adverse effects Granular casts in urine 3 4 7 14 Rise of BUN and/or creatinine 2 2 5 9 Discontinuation for possible toxicity 1 2 3 bacter strains responded favorably (six of six), as did six of seven infections due to Proteus sp. nfections due to E. coli responded in four of nine patients; those caused by P. aeruginosa and S. marscecens were each observed in three patients and responded well in two patients in each group. Concerning eradication of the pathogen from the site of the infection, netilmicin seemed also more effective in cases due to Klebsiella-Enterobacter and Proteus strains; six of six and five of seven pathogenic organisms, respectively, were eradicated. Adverse effects that might have been associated with the administration of netilmicin were observed in 14 (46%) patients in this series. All these adverse effects were related to the kidneys. Granular casts appeared in the urine of 14 patients; in 9, this finding was associated with a rise above normal values of the BUN or the serum creatinine level or both. Therapy with netilmicin was discontinued in three of these patients, and another patient died during therapy, presumably as a consequence of severe pulmonary infection caused by P. mirabilis; to what extent the renal failure in that patient contributed to the fatal outcome is difficult to assess. Similarly, it is difficult to delineate the respective roles of netilmicin and severe infection in the appearance of acute renal dysfunction in that patient. n the other patients, the renal function impairment was mild and transitory: abnormal findings in the urinary sediment and abnormal values of the BUN and serum creatinine levels returned to normal after discontinuation of the drug. As indicated in Table 2, there was a possible relationship between the dosage of netilmicin and the occurrence of renal function impairment. Since most strains involved in the infections studied here were very susceptible to netilmicin (MC, <1,g/ml), no relation between the susceptibility in vitro and the clinical outcome could be found. The bactericidal activity was higher in the group receiving 7.5 mg of netilmicin per kg as compared with the other groups; the geometric mean for the peak level was 1/8 and 1/4 for the trough level; the corresponding values were 1/4 and 1/2 in the two other groups. No clear relationship could be found between the bactericidal activity of the serum and the clinical outcome: in patients who failed to respond as well as in those who had a favorable outcome, the mean peak bactericidal activity of the serum against the offending pathogen was 1/8 Ṫhe serum levels of netilmicin are indicated in Fig. 6. These levels were similar for the two groups of patients receiving the lower doses of netilmicin. Respectively, the mean peak and trough levels in micrograms per milliliter were 6.1 ±.48 (standard error) and 1.9 ±.29, for the patients receiving 4.5 mg/kg, and 6.2 +.58 and 2. ±.3 in those treated with 6. mg/kg. No significant difference could be found between the serum levels obtained early and those obtained later during therapy. n the patients who received 7.5 mg/kg, the blood levels of netilmicin were much higher. The peak and trough levels were 9.8 +.9 and 4.5 ±.76 if all the available values were taken into account. The corresponding means calculated from values obtained during the first 2 days of therapy, when no significant renal function impairment was present, were 9.3 ± 1.1 and 3.6 ±.7. DSCUSSON nfections caused by gram-negative pathogens have become increasingly important as a cause of severe infection in the past decade, and the effectiveness of aminoglycosides against these microorganisms should be studied, since there has been a significant increase in resistance to these antimicrobial agents. Gentamicin remains very active againstp. mirabilis ande. coli strains, but some Klebsiella and Enterobacter are becoming gentamicin resistant, es- Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

58 KASTERSKY ET AL. >21 2 19 17. 16. 15. - 14. 1 13 2 12. - 1. 71 6. 5. 4, 3'. 2,. @ *- *- *Sop @ *(22) :.... @ 1 H 6H 1H 6H 1H 6H 4.5 mg /kg 6 mg/kg 7.5 mg/kg FG. 6. Blood levels ofnetilmicin observed 1 and 6 h after the injection of.5,2., and 2.5 mg ofnetilmicin per kg. Horiontal solid bars represent means; interrupted bars represent means calculated from values observed during the first 2 days oftherapy. pecially in hospitals where this antibiotic is often used. Tobramycin, in our study, seems more active than gentamicin against Enterobacter and P. aeruginosa; it is particularly effective against species of P. aeruginosa that are resistant to gentamicin. Sisomicin is a gentamicin derivative, and our results show that sisomicin may be more active than gentamicin against some strains, but that there is a high incidence of cross-resistance between gentamicin and sisomicin. Amikacin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic similar to kanamycin, is less active on a weight basis than tobramycin or gentamicin, but it might have a therapeutic advantage on the basis of higher blood levels. Amikacin was the most active drug when compared with the other aminoglycosides. SS - 2. ANTMCROB. AGENTS CHZMOTHER. Netilmicin is another new semisynthetic aminoglycoside antibiotic; it is a semisynthetic derivative of sisomicin. Our data suggest that netilmicin is more active againstklebsiella and Enterobacter than the other aminoglycosides are but, on the other hand, netilmicin is less active against P. aeruginosa when compared with sisomicin or tobramycin. Moreover, among the 44 strains resistant to gentamicin in our study, 9 strains were also resistant to netilmicin. Our in vitro studies confirm recent data from studies that compared the newer aminoglycosides, including netilmicin, against a variety of clinical isolates (3, 5, 11). The activity of netilmicin, sisomicin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin against most strains ofenterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa is, in general, quite similar with respect to potency by weight and achievable blood levels. Available controlled studies have failed so far to demonstrate a clinical advantage of one of these drugs over the other, provided that the infections treated were caused by pathogens susceptible in vitro to the antibiotic that was being administered (9, 14). A major role in clinical practice, however, is to be expected from the newer aminoglycosides, namely, tobramycin, netilmicin, and amikacin, in the management of infections caused by gentamicin-resistant strains. Studies by other investigators indicate that both netilmicin and amfikacin show a high degree of activity against gentamicin-resistant strains (12). A favorable clinical response was observed in 7% of the patients treated with netilmicin in this series; in another recent study, the total favorable response rate was 77% for amikacin and 78% for gentamicin (14). Sisomicin has been effective in 66% of wound infections in a population ofpatients similar to the one studied here (8), and in a controlled study we did not find any difference between gentamicin and tobramycin in terms of clinical effectiveness (9). This is an overall evaluation, since the frequency of favorable response is related to the severity of the underlying disease and to the site of infection; nevertheless, it appears that netilmicin has a clinical efficacy that is approximately similar to the other newer aminoglycosides, provided that the microorganism responsible for the infection treated is susceptible in vitro. Feld and co-workers did not find any difference between amikacin and tobramycin in the treatment of infection in patients with cancer. The overall rate of favorable response was 67% for tobramycin and 69% for amikacin in that study (4). Netilmicin should probably be used for the treatment of infection at a dosage between 4.5 Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest

VOL. 12, 1977 and 6. mg/kg, which is the dosage usually recommended for gentamicin and tobramycin. At a higher dosage (7.5 mg/kg), the frequency of untoward reactions (renal function impairment) was higher than that observed at the lower dosages: granular casts appeared in the urine of 7 of 1 patients, and a rise of the BUN and/or the serum creatinine level was observed in 5/1 patients. The bactericidal activity of the serum of patients receiving antibiotics is considered as a useful guide for predicting a favorable clinical outcome (7). This has not been verified in the present study, however, it should be emphasied that the number of patients studied here was small. n addition, the antibacterial activity of the serum may not be as valuable for aminoglycosides as for other antibiotics in predicting the clinical outcome, since local factors such as the ph and binding to purulent material (1) may influence the antimicrobial effectiveness of this type of antibiotic at the site of the infection. To conclude, our study suggests that netilmicin is probably as effective as gentamicin and the other newer aminoglycosides in the management of bacterial infections caused by susceptible microorganisms. ts role in the management of infections caused by gentamicinresistant organisms will probably prove to be important, since cross-resistance between gentamicin and netilmicin does not always occur. Nephrotoxicity due to aminoglycosides has been reported to be dose related in experimental animals, and comparative studies have shown netilmicin to be less nephrotoxic than gentamicin. n the present study, granular casts or increased levels of serum creatinine or BUN were observed in several of the patients who received 7.5 mg of netilmicin per kg per day. Although these changes were usually mild and transient, they should be watched for and, if found, should suggest appropriate dosage adjustments. The relatively low margin between the effective and the toxic dose of netilmicin and other aminoglycosides makes it mandatory to explore their effectiveness when used as a part of a combination with a penicillin or a cephalosporin. Many aminoglycoside antibiotics are synergistic against various!enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa when used in combination with penicillins or cephalosporins (1). Some studies suggest that this might be the case for netilmicin as well (13). Since the in vitro synergism between antibiotics probably has a clinical significance in the management of gram-negative infections (6), further in vitro and clinical studies of the effectiveness of netilmicin combined NETLMCN N GRAM-NEGATVE NFECTONS 59 with penicillins or cephalosporins are probably warranted. ACKNOWLEDGMEN1S This study was supported by a grant from the Fonds de la Recherche Medicale (no. 2.368), Brussels, Belgium, and by Schering Corp., Bloomfield, N. J. The technical assistance of D. Weerts and M. Husson is gratefully acknowledged. LTERATURE CTED 1. Bryant, R. E., and D. Hammond. 1974. nteraction of purulent material with antibiotics used to treatpseudomonas infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 6:72-77. 2. Davis, W. W., and E. R. Stout. 1971. Disc plate method of microbiological antibiotic assay.. Factors influencing variability and error.. Novel procedure offering improved accuracy. Appl. Microbiol. 22:659-67. 3. Dhawan, V., E. Marso, W. J. Martin, and L. S. Young. 1977. n vitro studies with netilmicin compared with amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11:64-73. 4. Feld, R., M. Valdivieso, G. P. Bodey, and V. Rodrigue. 1977. Comparison of amikacin and tobramycin in the treatment of infection in patients with cancer. J. nfect. Dis. 135:666. 5. Kantor, R. J., and C. W. Norden. 1977. n vitro activity of netilmicin, gentamicin, and amikacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11:126-131. 6. Klastersky, J., R. Cappel, and D. Daneau. 1972. Clinical significance of in vitro synergism between antibiotics in gram-negative infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2:47-475. 7. Klastersky, J., D. Daneau, G. Swings, and D. Weerts. 1974. Antibacterial activity in serum and urine as therapeutic guide in bacterial infections. J. nfect. Dis. 129:187-193. 8. Klasteraky, J., C. Henagens, M. G6rard, and D. Daneau. 1975. Sisomicin bacteriological and clinical evaluation. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 15:252-261. 9. Klastersky, J., C. Heasgens A. Henri, and D. Daneau. 1974. Comparative clinical study of tobramycin and gentamicin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 5:133-138. 1. Klastersky, J., B. Myamwbeya, and L. Vandenborre. 1974. Antimicrobial effectiveness of kanamycin, aminosidin, BB-K8, sisomicin, gentamicin and tobramycin combined with carbenicillin or cephalothin against gram negative rods. J. Med. Microbiol. 7:465-472. 11. Meyer, R. D., L. L. Kraus, and K. A. Pasiecnlk. 1976. n vitro susceptibility of gentamicin-reistantenterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to netilmicin and selected aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1:677-681. 12. Meyers, B. R., and S. Z. Hlrschman 1977. Antimicrobial activity in vitro of netilmicin and comparison with sisomicin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11:118-121. 13. Podgwid, S. M., and S. A. Lerner. 1976. n vitro activity of gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmicin alone and in combination with carbenicillin against Serratia marcewens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1:878-884. 14. Smith, C. R., K. L. Bauglman, C. Q. Edwards, J. F. Rogers, and P. S. Lietman. 1977. Controlled comparison of amikacin and gentamicin. N. Engl. J. Med. 296:349-353. 15. Steers, E., E. L. Folt, and B. S. Graves. 1959. An inocula-replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antibiot. Chemother. 9:37-311. Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on October 15, 218 by guest