RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE MECHANISMS

Similar documents
New Opportunities for Microbiology Labs to Add Value to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

Rapid Rewards. Identification from Positive Blood Cultures

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Recommendations Regarding Use of Rapid Blood Pathogen Identification Panel Data

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Antimicrobial Stewardship:

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

OCTOBER 7-10 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

SIDP Antimicrobial Stewardship Certificate Program Antimicrobial Stewardship and Microbiology: Focus on Rapid Diagnostic Tests

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

THE FAST AND THE SUSCEPTIBLE: RAPID DIAGNOSTICS IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

HPN HOSPITALIZED PNEUMONIA APPLICATION

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

microbiology testing services

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

4/4/2017. Update on Diagnostic Assays for Rapid Detection of Bacteremia. Disclosures. Learning Objectives

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Antimicrobial Resistance Strains

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Antibiotic Resistance. Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Concern. Antibiotic resistance is not new 3/21/2011

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Microbiology. Multi-Drug-Resistant bacteria / MDR: laboratory diagnostics and prevention. Antimicrobial resistance / MDR:

10/11/2017. Objectives. Case #1

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

The Role and Effect of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Within the Hospital and How Rapid Diagnostics Can Make an Impact

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Antimicrobial de-escalation in the ICU

INCIDENCE OF BACTERIAL COLONISATION IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE FROM SENTINEL PUBLIC HOSPITALS, SOUTH AFRICA, 2014

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Basics of Antibiotic resistance: Focus on Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

The International Collaborative Conference in Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

The Nuts and Bolts of Antibiograms in Long-Term Care Facilities

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Rise of Resistance: From MRSA to CRE

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

FIS Resistance Surveillance: The UK Landscape. Alasdair MacGowan Chair BSAC Working Party on Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

10/19/2017. Objectives

Workshop Summary and Action Items

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

CUMULATIVE ANTIBIOGRAM

Susceptibility Testing and Resistance Phenotypes Detection in Bacterial Pathogens Using the VITEK 2 System

CARBAPENEM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE (KPC CRE)

Management of Hospital-acquired Pneumonia

Infection Control of Emerging Diseases

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

ADC 2016 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Witchcraft for Gram negatives

UNDERSTANDING THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Mongolia September 2012

CME/SAM. Validation and Implementation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay in a Pediatric Setting

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Rapid molecular testing to detect Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures improves patient management. Martin McHugh Clinical Scientist

DR. MICHAEL A. BORG DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL MATER DEI HOSPITAL - MALTA

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Breaking the Ring. β-lactamases and the Great Arms Race. Bryce M Kayhart, PharmD, BCPS PGY2 Pharmacotherapy Resident Mayo Clinic - Rochester

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

LEARNING OBJECTIVES ANTIMICROBIAL USES AND ABUSES INFECTIOUS DISEASE SCARES

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Drive More Efficient Clinical Action by Streamlining the Interpretation of Test Results

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

Can we trust the Xpert?

Transcription:

RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE MECHANISMS Christine C. Ginocchio, PhD, MT (ASCP) Professor of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, NY VP, Global Microbiology Affairs, biomerieux VP, Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, BioFire Antimicrobials 2015, Brisbane, Australia

Clinical History: Jane Doe A 58 year old female with a history of COPD, multiple past hospital admissions collapses at home and it brought by ambulance to the Emergency Department Patient in distress, temperature 102.1 o F, confused, short of breath, tachycardic, hypotensive, productive cough, chest pain Preliminary Tests: WBC: elevated at 18,000 Lactate is elevated Urine urinalysis is normal, culture ordered Sputum culture ordered Chest radiograph is normal, no infiltrates, consolidations etc Transferred to ICU 2

Duration of Hypotension and Initiation of Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy ED PCT: 3.25 PCT: 9.75 PCT: 16.5 UC-/BC+ Growth ID/AST Etest PCT: 16.0 UC/BC/AbX Lab Hours 48 60 60 72 72 84 84 Kumar A, et al.: Crit Care Med, 34: 1589-1596, 2006. 3

Resistance Detection from Direct Culture

Primary Screening: Chromogenic Agars MRSA, VRE, ESBL, KPC, CRE Performance varies Save 24-48 hr 5

The time to targeted therapy was significantly lower (P=0.006) in Case patients (mean; 44.317.9 h) versus Control patients: (mean; 56.513.6 h) Rapid testing yielded a significant result, with a difference of 12.2 h to targeted therapy Time to susceptibility test result between the full traditional methodology and CHROMagar was even larger (26.5 h) 6

Detection of meca Mediated Resistance Latex agglutination sensitivity meca detection: 92.3% to 97.29% In comparison to direct PCR 8

Rapid Detection of Carbapenemaseproducing Enterobacteriaece 9

10

11

3 hr for Gram Neg 4 hr for Gram positive 12

SCMA results in <4 hr. 91.5% categorical agreement, 6.51% minor, 2.56% major, 1.48% very major errors 13

Resistance Detection from Blood Cultures

AdvanDx PNA FISH Technology Fluorescence tagged peptide nucleic acid probes detects 16S rrna directly from positive blood cultures (G): S. aureus (G): S. aureus (R): CoNS (G) E. faecalis (R) other Enterococcus spp. (G): C. albicans (G): C. albicans (R): C. glabrata (G): C. albicans/c. parapsilosis (R): C. glabrata/c. krusei (Y): C. tropicalis 15

Assuming physician notification: potential savings was $1,837/patient PNA FISH: $82.72, C. albicans screen: $2.83 16

18

Accelerate Diagnostics Sample undergoes simple cleanup procedure, is added to the cassette which is inserted into the Accelerate ID/AST system. Any sample type can be used. The system extracts, immobilizes, and maps bacteria in sample. Microscope image: specks are individual bacteria, concentrated directly from a sample and immobilized for analysis. Automated susceptibility testing: After starting antibiotic exposure, susceptible cells begin to die (red stain) and resistant cells keep on growing (green). Yellow indicates injured cells that will soon die. The Accelerate ID/AST system reports susceptibility interpretation and resistance expression. Time: 2-4 hrs 19

An aliquot of the blood culture was subcultured in the presence of specific antibiotics and bacterial counts were monitored using the Sysmex UF-1000i flowcytometer at different times up to 180 min. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis allowed us to find out the cut-off point for differentiating between sensitive and resistant strains to the tested antibiotic. AST can be determined as early as 120 min since a blood culture bottle is flagged as positive. Essential agreement between our susceptibility test and commercial methods (E-test, MicroScan and Vitek) was 99%. 20

Detection of MSSA/MRSA from Positive Blood Broths BD-GeneOhm StaphSR Collected Specimen Specimen Preparation Lysis - DNA Extraction Reconstitution Of Reagents Results within 2 Hours Real-time PCR Analysis on the SmartCycler Definitive On-screen Results GeneXpert MRSA/SA-Cepheid 1 hour detection meca specific and detect chromosomal deletion isolates as meca positive 21

ID PharmaD was contacted with results of the rpcr; (Xpert MRSA, Cepheid) effective antibiotics and an infectious diseases consult were recommended. Multivariable regression assessed clinical and economic outcomes of the 156 patients. Mean time to switch from empiric vancomycin to cefazolin or nafcillin in patients with methicillinsusceptible S. aureus bacteremia was 1.7 days shorter post-rpcr (P=0.002). In the post-rpcr methicillin-susceptible and methicillinresistant S. aureus groups, the mean length of stay was 6.2 days shorter (P=0.07) and the mean hospital costs were $21,387 less (P=0.02). rpcr allows rapid differentiation of S. aureus bacteremia, enabling timely, effective therapy and is associated with decreased length of stay and health care costs. 22

23

Nanosphere Verigene Blood Culture ID Panels Gram Positive Targets US/FDA-Cleared Outside US Species Staphylococcus aureus X X Staphylococcus epidermidis X X Staphylococcus lugdunensis X X Streptococcus anginosus Group X Streptococcus agalactiae X X Streptococcus pneumoniae X X Streptococcus pyogenes X X Enterococcus faecalis X X Enterococcus faecium X X Genus Staphylococcus spp. X X Streptococcus spp. X X Micrococcus spp. X Listeria spp. X X Resistance meca (methicillin) X X vana (vancomycin) X X vanb (vancomycin) X X X Gram Negative Targets US/FDA-Cleared Outside US Species Escherichia coli 1 X X Klebsiella pneumoniae X X Klebsiella oxytoca X X Pseudomonas aeruginosa X X Serratia marcescens X Genus Acinetobacter spp. X X Citrobacter spp. X X Enterobacter spp. X X Proteus spp. X X Resistance CTX-M (ESBL) X X IMP (carbapenemase) X X KPC (carbapenemase) X X NDM (carbapenemase) X X OXA (carbapenemase) X X VIM (carbapenemase) X X 24

25

BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel Gram + Bacteria: Enterococcus spp. L. monocytogenes Staphylococcus spp. S. aureus Streptococcus spp. S. agalactiae (Group B) S. pyogenes (Group A) S. pneumoniae Antibiotic Resistance: meca Van A/B KPC Gram - Bacteria : A. baumannii Enterobacteriaceae Enterobacter cloacae Complex E. coli H. influenzae K. oxytoca K. pneumoniae N. meningitidis P. aeruginosa Proteus spp. S. marcescens Fungi: C. albicans C. glabrata C. krusei C. parapsiolosis C. tropicalis Identifies pathogens in 9 out of 10 positive blood cultures 26

Combining rapid pathogen ID with locally derived treatment guidelines, as application of these guidelines would have resulted in appropriate antimicrobial intervention for 99.2% of blood cultures growing organisms detected by the BCID panel. 27

Mortality Risk with Inappropriate Therapeutic Selection Abx P-T/Vanco BC+ Abx Dori AST 48 60 72 84 K.pneumoniae Amikacin Ampicillin Cefazolin Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Cefepime Colistin Doripenem Ertapenem Gentamicin Imipenim Levofloxacin Meropenem Piperacillin/taxobactam Tigecycline Tobramycin R R R R R R R S R R R R R R R S R Time to critical AST result 13 hr: K. pneumoniae KPC+ 28

Power Ionising Vacuum Negative MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry 29

Off label use: Laboratory validated 30

Performance of Direct Testing 31

32

33

34

35

Beta lactamase with cefotaxime Discrimination between E. coli strains that were R or S to aminopenicillins and R to 3rd-generation cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae that constitutively produced class C lactamases had a with a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. Discrimination was more difficult in species expressing class A -lactamases, as these enzymes can generate false-positive results. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity for this group were 100% and 91.5%, respectively. Cefotaxime 36

Whole Genome Sequencing 37

Roche (Oxford) MinION Nanopore Sequencing 38

40

Rapid Direct Specimen Detection

Curetis Unyvero LRTI Panel 42

27 (55.1%) and 4 (8.2%) harbored multiple bacteria by UPA and culture, respectively. Single pathogen was detected in 8 patients (16.3%) by UPA and 4 patients (8.2%) by culture Thirteen different genes were detected from 38 patients, including ermb (40.8%), blaoxa-51-like (28.6%), sul1 (28.6%) int1 (20.4%) integrase, meca and blactx-m (12.3% each). Time from sample testing to results was 4 h (UPA) versus 48 to 96 h (culture) Initial empirical treatment was changed within 5 to 6 h in 33 (67.3%) patients based on UPA. Thirty (62.2%) of the patients improved clinically. Potential of a multiplex PCR-based assay for accurate and timely detection of etiological agents of NP, multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, and resistance markers, which can guide clinicians in making early antibiotic adjustments. 43

44

T2 BioSystems Clinical Trial Data Blood specimens from 1801 hospitalized patients Overall specificity: 99.4% (95% CI, 99.1% 99.6%) with a mean time to negative result of 4.2 ± 0.9 hours 98.9% (95% CI, 98.3% 99.4%) for C. albicans/c. tropicalis 99.3% (95% CI, 98.7% 99.6%) for C. parapsilosis 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7% 100.0%) for C. krusei/c. glabrata Overall sensitivity: 91.1% (95% CI, 86.9% 94.2%) with a mean time of 4.4 ± 1.0 hours for detection and species identification 92.3% (95% CI, 85.4% 96.6%) for C. albicans/c. tropicalis 94.2% (95% CI, 84.1% 98.8%) for C. parapsilosis 88.1% (95% CI, 80.2% 93.7%) for C. krusei/c. glabrata LOD was 1 CFU/mL for C. tropicalis and C. krusei, 2 CFU/mL for C. albicans and C. glabrata, and 3 CFU/mL for C. parapsilosis NPV was estimated to range from 99.5% to 99.0% in a study population with 5% and 10% prevalence of candidemia, respectively 45

Rapid Susceptibility Advantage of speed: Rapid institution of appropriate therapy Antimicrobial stewardship programs Know the limitations: May be a preliminary result Genetic testing may miss new strains or variants (meca dropouts, mecc, carbapenemase genes) Phenotypic testing is still essential Understand the difficulties in standardization (MALDI) Teach: May tell you what you cannot treat with but may not tell you with what you can treat with 46

47