Stockton Animal Shelter Operations. City Council May 23, 2017 Study Session

Similar documents
CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: January 23, 2013

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343

Oakland Police Department. Bureau of Services. Animal Services

2016 STATISTICS. The LRR is calculated by dividing total live outcomes (adoptions, outgoing transfers, return to owner/guardian) by total outcomes

Animal Services Department

Ramona Humane Society Animal Transfer Program

Animal Shelter Management and Services Agreement

GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY ANIMAL CENSUS REPORT January 2018

Municipal Animal Control in New Jersey, Best Practices March 2018


Dallas Animal Services Highlights and Outlook Presented to the Dallas City Council February 20, 2013

SEMINOLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANIMAL SERVICES LIMITED REVIEW OF ANIMAL DISPOSITION REPORT NO APRIL 2009

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER LI

Animal Care And Control Department

Animal Control Budget Unit 2760

Pierce County. November 8, 2018

Taimie L. Bryant * Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. INTRODUCTION

2017 Super Survey. Agency Information Super Survey. Profile of Your Agency. * 1. Address

Background Paper for Proposed Ordinance

CITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265

INS AND OUTS OF SHELTER ADMISSION WHOLE CAT WORKSHOP MARCH 2016 PRESENTED BY STACEY PRICE

City of Burleson, Texas

City of Burleson, Texas

S 2510 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

A New Approach to Saving Cats?

RENO V. AUSTIN: ANIMAL-SHELTER REFORM EFFORTS IN TWO EXPANDING U.S. CITIES PRODUCE DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT FIRST-YEAR RESULTS

ANIMAL SHELTER and ADOPTION CENTER

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN BY-LAW NO As Amended by By-law No

No Frill No Kill: A New Approach to Saving Cats?

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

ANTIOCH ANIMAL SERVICES

AnimalShelterStatistics

How Pets Arrived at the SPCA

RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND POUND FUNDING IN OTTAWA-CARLETON

NAIA Shelter Import and Reporting Act Model Law

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 (ANIMALS) OF THE EL PASO CITY CODE

5/8/2018. Successful Animal Shelters: It s Not Just About the Money. Myth Busting

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES STUDY

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 7.05 OF THE SPEEDWAY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ANIMALS

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

How Pets Arrived at The SPCA

the release of feral cats, authorizing their release to qualifying feral cat colonies. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

BILL NUMBER: SB 1785 CHAPTERED 09/23/98

VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.

Classification and Salary: Registered Veterinary Technician Classification

D. "Poundmaster" means any person or entity appointed by the Council to discharge the duties provided for under this Section.

MLA Research Paper (Berger)

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by creating provisions related to the managed care of feral cats and revising definitions.

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

BYLAW NUMBER

Sec. 2. Authority. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the authority granted in 7 M.R.S.A. s3950 and 30-M.R.S.A.s3001.

Winnebago County Animal Services

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

BY-LAW NUMBER WHEREAS The Corporation of the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville has pursuant to The Municipal Act, Section 354 (1), and Part 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

Town of Preble Local Law umber 4 of the Year 2010 A LOCAL LAW PROVIDI G FOR THE LICE SI G A D THE CO TROL OF DOGS I THE TOW OF PREBLE

BULLETIN AUGUST 1994 NEW LAW AUTHORIZING REVISION OF DOG CONTROL FEES AND ANIMAL SHELTERS TO ADMINISTER DRUGS FOR EUTHANASIA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

MEMORANDUM. June 10 th, To: Members of Common Council. From: Belinda Lewis, Director Animal Care and Control

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16

BYLAW NUMBER

Winnebago County Animal Services

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

Here are step by step guides and model language for those who want to bring CAPA to their state

Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law

Police Department: Palo Alto Animal Services Audit

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE CORPORATE SERVICES AND COMMUNITY SAFETY DEPARTMENT DOG LICENCE FEE INCREASE

BYLAW 837/12 Cat Control Bylaw

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

GIVE ME SHELTER. South Australia's new dog and cat laws: a guide for shelter and rescue organisations

MEMORANDUM. The Honorable Carrie M. Austin Chairman, Committee on the Budget and Government Operations

Orange County Grand Jury

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Animal Birth Control (Dog) Rules, 2001

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE

BY-LAW D-003 MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST HANTS Dog By-law

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

RP Provide Veterinary Medical Services for the Animal Welfare & Enforcement Division on an Annual Contract Addendum 3

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

What's Happening to Cats at HAS?

MUNICIPALITY OF EAST HANTS BYLAW NUMBER P-1000 A BYLAW AMENDMENT TO BYLAW 111-A, DOG BYLAW

TITLE 61 LEGISLATIVE RULE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SERIES 24 WEST VIRGINIA SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ANIMAL CALLS SUBJECT

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

This chapter will be known as the "Dogs and Other Animals Control Local Law of the Town of Skaneateles."

Transcription:

Stockton Animal Shelter Operations City Council May 23, 2017 Study Session

BACKGROUND Purpose is to address animal welfare and sheltering for animals within the City limits MOU with San Joaquin County for sheltering animals since 1981 2012 Live Release Rate (LRR) was about 32% Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) vs City of Stockton Council increased funding and Shelter revamped operations San Francisco SPCA (SF SPCA) partnered with the Shelter at their own expense in 2012 City contributed incrementally toward cost neutrality beginning in 2015 By 2016 LRR increased to 82% SF SPCA leaving the Shelter in June 2018

LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY California Penal Code 597.1(a): Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. 597.1(c): Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment. 599d(a): It is the policy of the state that no adoptable animal should be euthanized if it can be adopted into a suitable home. 599d(b): It is the policy of the state that no treatable animal should be euthanized.

LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY California Health and Safety Code 121690: The governing body of each city, city and county, or county shall maintain or provide for the maintenance of a pound system and a rabies control program. California Food and Agricultural Code 31105: The board of supervisors shall provide for both of the following: (a) The taking up and impounding of all dogs which are found running at large (b) The killing in some humane manner or other disposition of any dog which is impounded 31108: The required holding period for a stray dog impounded shall be six business days, not including the day of impoundment. 31752: The required holding period for a stray cat impounded shall be six business days, not including the day of impoundment.

LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY Stockton Municipal Code 6.04.250: Impounding animals The Animal Services Center may take into custody and impound any animal that is found at large or otherwise contrary to Section 6.04.120 if the Animal Services Center reasonably believes that such impoundment is necessary to protect: (1) the public health, safety, and welfare; (2) public or private property; (3) an animal that is sick or injured for which care is necessary; or (4) from imminent injury or danger an animal that has strayed onto a public right of way or other public property. 6.04.280: When animals may be adopted, transferred or euthanized A. the Animal Services Center shall not adopt or transfer out or euthanize a dog or cat until the State mandated holding period. E. The holding period provided in this section shall be considered a minimum holding period. To permit the public as much time as possible to retrieve or adopt animals, the Animal Services Center shall extend the holding period for individual animals to the extent that kennel space is available and the overall health and safety of the animals in the Shelter are not affected negatively.

ALDF vs. City of Stockton Settlement Effective May 6, 2015 City agreed to review and modify, as necessary, the policies and procedures of the Stockton Animal Shelter to include the following areas: a. Dog shelter operations: intake, data entry, medical care, etc. b. Cat shelter operations: intake, data entry, medical care, etc. c. Dog population management: incomes, outcomes, housing, cleaning, etc. d. Cat population management: incomes, outcomes, housing, cleaning, etc. e. Euthanasia f. Cleaning g. Medical care h. ID follow up

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS MOU with San Joaquin County June 9, 1981, amended August 20, 1990, addressing fee schedules. Financing apportioned between City and County in the ratio of live animals collected. Contract with SF SPCA 2012 2014 SF SPCA providing consulting services to improve Shelter operations. 2015 City began partially funding the cost of on site veterinarians and additional staff. FY 2016 17 Council approved 2 year Contract for veterinarian, adoption/foster, and volunteer services. City now paying for medical supplies and medications needed. June 30, 2018 contract expires, SF SPCA has provided notice of intent not to renew. Contracts with local emergency vets for after hours emergency care.

SHELTER STAFFING Current City Staff Shelter (12.5) Animal Services Manager (1) Animal Services Supervisor (1) Animal Services Assistant I (8) Office Specialist (1) Office Assistant II (1.5) Field Services (5) Senior Animal Services Officer (1) Animal Services Officer (4) Current SF SPCA Staff (17) Managing Veterinarian (1) Veterinarian (1.5) RVT Supervisor (1) Veterinarian Technician (8) Live Release Coordinator (1) Foster Coordinator (1) Volunteer Coordinator (1) Live Release Assistant (1) Adopt A Bulls Coordinator (.5) Humane Educator (.5) Clinic Assistant (.5) San Joaquin County Field Services (8) Animal Control Officers (8)

$2,500,000 $2,000,000 Expenditures and Live Release Rate 75% 82% 82% 82% 90% 80% 70% $1,500,000 50% 60% 50% $1,000,000 32% 40% 30% $500,000 20% 10% $ FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Animal Services Animal Shelter SF SPCA Contract LRR 0%

CASE STUDY: STOCKTON vs. SACRAMENTO STOCKTON ANIMAL SERVICES SACRAMENTO ANIMAL SERVICES 2016 Budget $2,644,015 Live Animal Intake 10,705 2016 Live Release Rate 82% Employees 34* 2016 Budget $4,622,579 Live Animal Intake 11,361 2016 Live Release Rate 84% Employees 49 * Includes 17 SF SPCA Positions

Financial Impacts for FY 2017 18 112% increase in Shelter spending since 2012 Shelter budget in Proposed FY 2017 18 Annual Budget is $2.8 million Incorporates SF SPCA Contract increase to $750,000 To maintain existing services level and LRR, additional budget of $565,000 is needed for medical supplies, staffing and other expenses

City s Long Range Financial Plan Impacts Proposed Shelter Budget of $2.8 million in FY 2017 18 keeps General Fund Balance at or above 5% Increase of $565,000 for medical supplies, staffing and other expenses to maintain existing level of service reduces General Fund Balance to 1% by FY 2029 30 Taking over Shelter operations from SF SPCA and maintaining current service levels results in negative General Fund Balance by FY 2027 28