STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

San Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance

Sec Mandatory spaying and neutering. a. 1. Requirement. No person may own, keep, or harbor an unaltered and unspayed dog or cat in

Ordinance Fact Sheet FROM: TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: January 27, 2014 CITY ATTORNEY

Library. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

SEC BREEDING AND TRANSFER OF DOGS AND CATS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,168, Eff. 5/18/00, Oper. 11/15/00.)

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT NO.

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

H 7906 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======= LC02744/SUB A ======= STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D.

the release of feral cats, authorizing their release to qualifying feral cat colonies. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN

The Board of the Town of Schroon, in regular session convened, ordains as follows:

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE:

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GILROY AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ENTITLED ANIMALS AND FOWL PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF DOGS AND CATS

CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF CLARK, SECTION 1. Title 10, Chapter 08, Section 130 of the Clark County Code is hereby

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

ORDINANCE NO

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

TOWN OF LUDLOW, VERMONT DOG ORDINANCE

6.04 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS

MTAS Sample Animal Licensing Regulations

MEMORANDUM JOHN ROGERS, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR HEATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. MISTREATMENT OF ANIMALS

Title 8 ANIMALS. Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals. 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs. 8-3 Keeping of Livestock

Chapter relating to feral cats Feral Cats

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

Title 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS

ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE COUNTY OF MUSKEGON. Ordinance No September 12, 2006

TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

ORDINANCE NO. CS-296

TOWN OF PERU LOCAL LAW NO. OF THE YEAR Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Peru as follows:

THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SCHROON LOCAL LAW NO

WHEREAS, tens of thousands of unwanted and abandoned dogs and cats are euthanized every year; and

LEGISLATURE

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

Dog Licensing Regulation

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.

ORDINANCE NO. 14,155

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

St. Paul City Ordinance

DOG CONTROL AND LICENSE LAW OF THE TOWN OF CAMPBELL Local Law No. 2 of the Year 2010

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

California Code of Regulations Health and Safety Code. Division 105. Communicable Disease Control. Chapter 1 Rabies Control

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 26, 2016

Dog Control Ordinance

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 7-1 PUBLIC HEARING. Date: June 17, Subject: Subject Property: Citywide. 1. Declare the Hearing Open: Mayor Duhovic

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY OF RIO RANCHO ORDINANCE NO.

c) Owners walking their dog( s) in public areas are required to pick up and properly dispose of stool waste deposited from their dog( s).

ORDINANCE NO. 1534(06)

Chapter 70. A Local Law Entitled Dog Control and Dog Licensing [Adopted by L.L. #2-2010]

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE NO BISHOP PAIUTE RESERVATION BISHOP, CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

BYLAW NUMBER

CURRENT TEXAS ANIMAL LAWS

County Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents

Ordinance No January 26, 2016 Page 2

AGENDA ITEM. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: July 25, 2017

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA DATE: September 21, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010 TITLE OF ITEM: Ordinance Mandating Spay and Neutering Programs for Specific Dog Breeds Brief Description: This ordinance would require owners of pure bred and mixed breed Pit Bulls and Chihuahuas to have their pets spayed or neutered except for owners who obtain a certificate to maintain an unaltered dog. Recommendation: To impose these restrictions the Council is asked to introduce this ordinance at the October 4 meeting for adoption on October 18. SUMMARY: This report supplements the previous staff reports received by the Council at its meetings of May 3, 2010 and August 2. Those reports documented the need for a breed specific ordinance mandating spay and neutering to reduce the number of unadoptable Pit Bulls and Chihuahuas that must be euthanized. At the May 3 meeting Council directed the City Attorney to draft an ordinance that would require owners to spay or neuter pure bred and mixed breed Pit Bulls and Chihuahuas, with some exceptions. The Council introduced the ordinance on August 2. On August 16, the City Attorney recommended that the ordinance not be adopted (1) to allow Animal Control staff to develop an ordinance that would be easier to implement and enforce and (2) to allow City staff and opponents of the ordinance to meet to discuss other options that would reduce the overpopulation of these two breeds. Committee Meetings since August 16 Staff met with interested members of the community on August 17, August 24, and September 9. Each meeting lasted at least two hours, and the participants included current Shelter staff and volunteers, members of rescue organizations and kennel clubs, and dog breeders. Some members opposed any mandated spaying/neutering, and other members supported an ordinance that mandates spay/neuter for all dogs. The participants discussed the problem that the ordinance sought to solve as well as the identification of 20 solution ideas, including increased availability of free and low cost spay/neuter services, better dog owner and public education, better and increased advertising of adoptable dogs, better City website, increased volunteer pool, increased licensing fees for all dogs, and increased punishment for at-large dogs. The majority of the participants at the September 9 meeting supported the concept of a mandatory Staff report for mandatory spay ordinance

spay/neuter ordinance for Chihuahuas and Pit Bulls (Restricted Breeds) that is more flexible and that requires less staff implementation. This is the ordinance that is recommended by the City Attorney and the Police Department. Proposed Ordinance The proposed ordinance is closely modeled upon the Santa Cruz County ordinance. Although Santa Cruz County mandates spay/neuter for all cats and dogs, Hollister s ordinance only requires that the Restricted Breeds (Pitbulls and Chihuahuas) be altered, consistent with California Food and Agriculture Code Sections 31683 and 122331. These state laws allow local agencies to adopt breed specific mandatory spaying and neutering programs. The following is a summary of the proposed ordinance that highlights relevant changes from the previous ordinance: 1. The previous proposed ordinance addressed two problems: (1) the fact that in the past two years Pit Bulls were the overwhelming majority of dogs determined to be dangerous under our ordinance (Chapter 6.13) and (2) the overpopulation of the two breeds leading to large numbers being euthanized. This ordinance addresses the overpopulation of the two breeds only. As stated in the findings, in 2009 22% of all dogs euthanized were Chihuahuas and mixes and 38% were Pit Bulls and mixes. The numbers as of August 24, 2010 are similar out of 208 dogs euthanized, 55 (26%) were Chihuahuas and 70 (34%) were Pit Bulls. 2. Both ordinances create Chapter 6.20 of the Municipal Code entitled Mandatory Spay and Neuter Program requiring owners to spay/neuter restricted breed dogs. Under the previous proposed ordinance, it was more difficult for an owner to maintain an unaltered restricted dog. Owners had to prove that the restricted dog was a show dog and provide extensive evidence of its health and temperament. The current proposed ordinance allows any owner to maintain an unaltered restricted dog upon payment of one-time registration fee and annual licensing fee as long as the owner has not been convicted of specific crimes relating to animals. 3. This ordinance limits a restricted breed female to one litter per year except with written authorization from a licensed veterinarian. 4. This ordinance provides a process for appeal of denial or revocation of an unaltered restricted dog license, and regulates the sale or transfer of unaltered restricted dogs. 5. Penalties for violation of the ordinance include criminal prosecution (infraction for first and second violations; misdemeanor charge for the third) and required spay/neuter for the second time that a restricted dog is found running at large. If an unaltered restricted dog is impounded, the owner must get the dog altered or obtain an unaltered dog Staff report for mandatory spay ordinance

certificate before the dog may be released (except for unaltered restricted dogs that run at large more than once). Staff does not believe that the ordinance alone will solve the problem of overpopulation of these two breeds. The ordinance provides one more tool available to the City to control the numbers of unwanted Pit Bulls and Chihuahuas. The staff intends that the ordinance be implemented with other tools such as free or low cost spay/neuter services prioritized for Pit Bulls and Chihuahuas, increased advertising of adoptable dogs, and improved Shelter website, as current resources allow. Staff in the Police Department and City Attorney s Office support the adoption of this ordinance as a tool to reduce uncontrolled or irresponsible breeding practices in Hollister that have had a significant impact on the city s public health and safety and available City staff resources. DEPARTMENT: City Attorney, Stephanie Atigh 636-4306 Police Department, Chief Jeff Miller 636-4330 This report was reviewed by the City Manager who concurs with the staff s recommendation : Clint G. Quilter, City Manager Staff report for mandatory spay ordinance

Page 1 of 10 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER ADDING CHAPTER 6.20 MANDATORY SPAY AND NEUTER PROGRAM TO THE HOLLISTER MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council adopts Chapter 6.20 based upon the following findings: (a) The Legislature of the State of California approved of breed specific mandatory spaying and neutering by adopting Senate Bill 861 (SB 861), codified at California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 and California Health and Safety Code Section 122331. (b) The intent of SB 861 was to enable local governments to pass ordinances restricting the breeding of specific dog breeds by mandating the spaying (c) and neutering of specific dog breeds. It is the City Council s intention that nothing in this Chapter shall be deemed to conflict with state law as contained in the California Food and Agricultural Code and California Health and Safety Code. (d) It is the City Council s intention that nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to prevent dog owners in compliance with this section from maintaining intact breeds. (e) (f) (g) Pit bull breed and mixes and Chihuahua breed and mixes constitute a majority of unadopted dogs held in the Hollister Animal Shelter. In 2009 50 Chihuahuas and mixes (22%) and 90 pit bulls and mixes (38%) were euthanized after the maximum holding time for adoptions had expired. As of August 24, 2010, out of 208 City dogs that were euthanized, 55 were Chihuahuas (26%) and 70 Pit Bulls (34%). In 2009 Hollister Animal Control provided intake services to 768 dogs within the city limits. Of those dogs requiring the services of Hollister Animal Control, pit bull breed and pit bull mixes constituted 18% (141) and Chihuahuas and Chihuahua mixes accounted for 23% (176). As of August 24, 2010, Chihuahuas accounted for 117 intakes (19.4%) and Pit Bulls accounted for 122 intakes (20%), from a total of 626 intakes. To protect the public health, safety and welfare, it is the desire of the City Council to modify the Hollister Municipal Code consistent with California Health and Safety Code section 122331, regarding the mandatory spaying

Page 2 of 10 (h) and neutering of Pit Bull and Chihuahua breeds and the permissive maintenance and breeding of intact pit bull and Chihuahua breeds. Restricting the maintenance and breeding of intact pit bulls and Chihuahua and requiring the spaying and neutering of pit bull and Chihuahua breeds will not prevent responsible pet owners and pet breeders from owning, breeding, or showing pit bull or Chihuahua breeds. SECTION 2. Chapter 6.20 added. Chapter 6.20 of the Hollister Municipal Code entitled Mandatory Spay and Neuter Program is hereby added to read as follows: Chapter 6.20 Mandatory Spay and Neuter Program (California Health and Safety section 122331) Section 6.20.010 Purpose and intent. A. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 122331, it is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to require the mandatory spaying and neutering of all restricted dogs, as defined in Section 6.20.020, whose owners have not obtained an unaltered dog certification to maintain an intact restricted dog. B. It is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to establish a permit system allowing responsible owners to maintain an intact restricted dog and to breed restricted dogs. Section 6.20.020 Definitions. A. Except as otherwise provided by this section, the definitions applicable to the City s animal control regulations contained in Chapter 6.13 apply to this chapter as well. B. As used in this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: Animal Control means the department of the City that is responsible for the regulations specified in Title 6 of the Hollister Municipal Code. Chihuahua includes any dog that is a Smooth Coat Chihuahua, Long Coat Chihuahua or any dog that exhibits physical traits of any one or more of the above breeds or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club ( AKC ), United Kennel Club ( UKC ), or American Dog Breeders Association ( ADBA ) for any of the above breeds. These standards are listed on the clubs websites. City means the City of Hollister.

Page 3 of 10 Department means Animal Control of the City of Hollister. Dog Registry means the American Kennel Club ( AKC ), United Kennel Club ( UKC ), or American Dog Breeders Association ( ADBA ). Pit bull includes any dog that is a Bull Terrier, Miniature Bull Terrier, American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog that exhibits physical traits of any one or more of the above breeds or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club ( AKC ), United Kennel Club ( UKC ), or American Dog Breeders Association ( ADBA ) for any of the above breeds. These standards are listed on the clubs websites. Puppy means a dog under the age of six (6) months. Unaltered means an animal that has not been spayed or neutered. Section 6.20.030 Mandatory spaying, neutering of restricted dogs. A. The following breeds of dogs are restricted dogs, and are subject to the mandatory spay, neutering, and unaltered dog license requirements of this chapter: 1. Chihuahuas, as defined in Section 6.20.010; and 2. Pit Bulls, as defined in Section 6.20.010. B. The following animals are exempt from the provisions of this section: 1. Restricted dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used by public law enforcement agencies for law enforcement activities, or dogs designated as breeding stock by an appropriate law enforcement agency or organization approved by the Animal Control supervisor after consultation with knowledgeable professionals; 2. Restricted dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used by search and rescue agencies for search and rescue activities, or dogs designated as breeding stock by an appropriate search and rescue agency or organization approved by the Animal Control supervisor after consultation with knowledgeable professionals; 3. Restricted dogs certified by a licensed veterinarian as having a health reason for not being spayed/neutered; 4. Restricted dogs boarded in a licensed kennel or a business which boards such animals for professional training or resale.

Page 4 of 10 C. No person shall own, keep, or harbor a restricted dog in violation of this section. D. No person shall own, keep, or harbor a dog over the age of six (6) months which has not been spayed or neutered unless such person holds for the animal an unaltered dog certification for the animal issued pursuant to this Chapter E. Any person intentionally providing care or sustenance for a restricted dog shall be deemed the owner of such dog and shall comply with this Chapter. Section 6.20.040 Determination of Breed. A. Determination. The Department will make a breed determination upon request, or upon contact with, or impoundment of a dog believed to be an unaltered restricted dog. The determination shall be made by an Animal Control officer with the knowledge and experience sufficient to identify the restricted dog. B. Appeal. The dog owner or custodian may appeal a breed determination by filing a written request for appeal with the Department within ten (10) days after notice of the determination is mailed to the owner or custodian. No provision herein shall prohibit personal service. The determination of breed by Animal Control is deemed final if a timely appeal is not received by the Department. The hearing on the appeal shall be held within thirty (30) days after the Department s receipt of the request for appeal. The Department shall mail written notification to the owner or custodian of the date, time, and place of the hearing, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. Failure of the owner or custodian or agent to appear at the hearing will result in forfeiture of the right to a hearing. C. Hearing. The hearing may be informal and the rules of evidence not strictly observed. The hearing shall be conducted by a hearing officer designated by the Department. The determination of the hearing officer shall be final. D. Notice of determination following hearing. The Department shall serve written notification of the determination to the owner or custodian of the dog within ten (10) days after the hearing. E. Confirmation of compliance with Section 6.20.020. The owner or custodian of an unaltered restricted dog shall comply with Section 6.20.020 within fifteen (15) days after receipt of notice of determination that the unaltered dog is subject to Section 6.20.020, by submitting written documentation confirming compliance with that section. If the dog has been moved to another location before such written confirmation is required, the owner or custodian shall provide the Department with information as to the dog s whereabouts, including current owner or custodian s name, address, and telephone number. Section 6.20.050 Unaltered dog certification; administration.

Page 5 of 10 A. The Animal Control supervisor shall administer a certification program to allow for unaltered restricted dogs over the age of six months when s/he determines that the following conditions have been met: 1. The dog is examined annually by a licensed veterinarian and is following the preventative health care program recommended by the veterinarian. 2. The owner has not been convicted or is not on probation or parole for, of one or more violations of the following offenses within the preceding thirty-six months: a. Health and Safety Code 121705 (concealing bite information) b. Hollister Municipal Code 6.04.450 (interference with poundmaster) c. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.020 (confinement of females in heat and dangerous dogs) d. Any violation of Hollister Municipal Code Chapter 6.13 (dangerous animals) e. Penal Code 286.5 (sexual assault on an animal) f. Penal Code 596 (poisoning of animal) g. Penal Code 597 (animal cruelty) h. Penal Code 597a (cruelty re transportation) i. Penal Code 597b (fighting animals) j. Penal Code 597f (failure to care) k. Penal Code 597j (training animal to fight) l. Penal Code 597l (pet shop owner violations) m. Penal Code 597t (confinement) n. Penal Code 597u (prohibited killing methods) o. Penal Code 597z (sale of dogs under 8 weeks) p. Penal Code 597.5 (fighting dogs) q. Penal Code 597.7 (confinement in motor vehicle) r. Penal Code 598a (killing animal to sell pelt) s. Penal Code 599 aa (seizure of fighting animals) t. Penal Code 487e, 487f or 487g (theft of animal) u. Any violation of another jurisdiction s ordinance or regulation the content of which is consistent with the above Hollister Municipal Code sections. 3. The owner has not been convicted of two or more violations of the following offenses within the preceding twenty-four months: a. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.010 (running at large) b. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.170 (impoundment)

Page 6 of 10 c. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.040 (vaccination required) d. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.030 (maximum number of dogs) e. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.050 (curbing dogs) f. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.120 (dog licensing) g. Any violation of another jurisdiction s ordinance or regulation the content of which is consistent with the above Hollister Municipal Code sections. 4. Within the preceding twenty-four months, the owner has not received an order from Animal Control of the city of Hollister or another jurisdiction involving the dog for which the unaltered dog certification is sought, pursuant to: a. Hollister Municipal Code 6.08.100 (quarantine of biting dog) or another jurisdiction s ordinance or regulation the content of which is consistent with this Hollister Municipal code section. b. Any order issued pursuant to Chapter 6.13 (Dangerous Animals) or another jurisdictions ordinance or regulation the content of which is consistent with this Hollister Municipal code section. 5. The dog for which the unaltered dog certification is sought has not been determined to be a dangerous dog pursuant to Chapter 6.13 of the Hollister Municipal Code or pursuant to another jurisdiction s dangerous dog ordinance or regulation. 6. The dog is properly housed and cared for as follows: a. The dog is provided sufficient quantity of good and wholesome food and water; b. The dog is provided shelter that will allow the animal to stand up, turn around, and lay down without laying in its feces; c. The area where the dog is kept is properly cleaned and disinfected; d. The dog must be fully contained on the owner s property and be provided appropriate exercise; e. The owner otherwise complies with any applicable state law concerning the care and housing of dogs. 7. The owner furnishes the animal control supervisor with a signed statement agreeing to the following conditions: a. The female unaltered restricted dog will have no more than one litter per year, unless the owner furnishes the Animal Control supervisor in advance of any breeding a written statement from a licensed veterinarian recommending that the dog be allowed to have up to two litters per year;

Page 7 of 10 b. Offspring of the unaltered restricted dog will not be sold or adopted or transferred until they are at least eight (8) weeks of age; c. Records will be kept for three (3) years documenting how many offspring were produced and who adopted or purchased them. 8. The dog for which the unaltered dog certification is sought is currently licensed as required by Chapter 6.08 of the Hollister Municipal Code. 9. Payment of one-time unaltered dog registration fee. B. Any person advertising to the public the availability of any dog subject to certification pursuant to this chapter, for adoption, sale, barter, or other transfer must prominently display the unaltered dog certification number in the advertisement. The certification number shall also be provided to any person adopting, purchasing, or accepting any dog subject to certification pursuant to this chapter. C. Any owner of a restricted dog who is denied an unaltered dog certification or whose certification is revoked by the Animal Control supervisor for failure to comply with the requirements of this section may appeal such denial or revocation to a hearing officer appointed by the City, using the same procedures outlined in section 6.20.030. Section 6.20.060 Penalties. The penalties for violations of any provision of this chapter are as follows: A. First violation. A first violation may result in the Department impounding the restricted dog in accordance with section 6.20.060. A first violation shall be an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100. If the owner or custodian fails to correct the underlying cause of the violation within thirty (30) days after being notified of the violation, it shall be deemed a second violation. Any owner of an unaltered restricted dog who has been cited for failing to obtain an unaltered dog certification shall have his or her citation dismissed if they are subsequently issued an unaltered animal certification, or if there is proof that the animal has been spayed or neutered within thirty days of the issuance of the citation. B. Second violation. A violation within one (1) year of a first violation shall be deemed a second violation. A second violation is an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $200. C. Third or more violation. Each subsequent violation after the second within one (1) year shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.

Page 8 of 10 Section 6.20.070 Impoundment of unaltered restricted dog. A. If an unaltered restricted dog is impounded, the owner or custodian may reclaim the unaltered restricted dog when one of the following occurs: 1. The dog is spayed or neutered by a Department veterinarian at the expense of the owner or custodian. A deposit shall be received prior to the procedure. Such expense may include additional fees due to extraordinary care required. 2. At the discretion of the Department, the restricted dog may be released to the owner or custodian if he/she signs a statement under penalty of perjury, representing that the dog will be spayed or neutered and that he/she will submit a statement within ten (10) days, signed by the veterinarian, confirming that the dog has been spayed or neutered. If the owner or custodian fails to comply with the terms or conditions of the statement, the Department shall have the right to impound the dog and the owner or custodian shall be charged with a second violation under Section 6.20.050. 3. The owner of the restricted dog obtains an unaltered dog certification. 4. During the pendency of any proceedings hereunder for the determination of breed. B. Second incident of unaltered restricted dog running at large The second time that an unaltered restricted dog is found to be running at large, or impounded for running at large, as that term is defined in Hollister Municipal Code section 6.08.010, the unaltered restricted dog shall be impounded, and the owner shall be required to spay or neuter the restricted dog as provided in 6.20.060 (A). C. Costs of impoundment. 1. The owner or custodian of the unaltered restricted dog shall be responsible for the costs of impoundment, including daily boarding costs if it is determined that the owner or custodian is in violation of Section 6.20.020. 2. The costs of impoundment shall be a lien on the dog, and the unaltered restricted dog shall not be returned to its owner or custodian until the costs are paid. If the owner or custodian of an impounded unaltered restricted dog does not

Page 9 of 10 pay the lien against the dog in full within fourteen (14) days, or any Department-approved extension of this deadline, the dog shall be deemed abandoned to the Department. Section 6.20.080 Allocation of fees and fines collected. All costs and fines collected under this chapter and the fees collected shall be paid to the Department for the purpose of defraying the cost of the implementation and enforcement of this chapter. Section 6.20.090 Relationship to Chapter 6.08. This chapter supplements the animal control regulations contained in Chapter 6.08 of the Hollister Municipal Code. To the extent that this chapter is in conflict with Chapter 6.08, this chapter shall control. Section 6.20.100 Severability. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, or word of this chapter is declared invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other portion of this chapter, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. PUBLICATION. Within fifteen (15) days after passage, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published one time in the Free Lance, a newspaper of general circulation. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect (30) days after the adoption date. INTRODUCED the day of 2010. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hollister held on the day of 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Victor Gomez, Mayor

Page 10 of 10 ATTEST: Geri Johnson, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Stephanie Atigh, City Attorney