HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS AND QASM PATIENTS

Similar documents
4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO)

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antimicrobial susceptibility

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

03/09/2014. Infection Prevention and Control A Foundation Course. Talk outline

SYMMETRY FOAMING HAND SANITIZER with Aloe & Vitamin E Technical Data

Role of the nurse in diagnosing infection: The right sample, every time

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Supplementary Appendix

Meropenem for all? Midge Asogan ICU Fellow (also ID AT)

Antibiotic Resistance. Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Concern. Antibiotic resistance is not new 3/21/2011

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

3 Infection Prevention Solutions

Infection Linelist. Infections Occurred Between 10/1/ :00:00 AM To 11/1/ :00:00 AM 2RCW2. Gastroenteritis (Adult) Urinary Tract

Recommendations Regarding Use of Rapid Blood Pathogen Identification Panel Data

Infection Prevention Highlights for the Medical Staff. Pamela Rohrbach MSN, RN, CIC Director of Infection Prevention

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

TECHNICAL BULLETIN PURELL Advanced with Aloe Instant Hand Sanitizer

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

Taking Action to Prevent and Manage Multidrug-resistant Organisms and C. difficile in the Nursing Home: Part 1 Reviewing the organisms

microbiology testing services

Cipro for gram positive cocci in urine

Treatment of Surgical Site Infection Meeting Quality Statement 6. Prof Peter Wilson University College London Hospitals

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Post-operative surgical wound infection

Drug Class Prior Authorization Criteria Intravenous Antibiotics

Choosing Antibiotics for Intra-Abdominal Infections: What Do We Mean by High Risk?*

What bugs are keeping YOU up at night?

Hospital Acquired Infections in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Multi-Drug Resistant Gram Negative Organisms POLICY REVIEW DATE EXTENDED Printed copies must not be considered the definitive version

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI ISOLATES AMONG DIFFERENT CLINICAL SAMPLES FROM A DIAGNOSTIC CENTER OF KANPUR

Vaccination as a potential strategy to combat Antimicrobial Resistance in the elderly

A retrospective analysis of urine culture results issued by the microbiology department, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya

Pathogens commonly isolated from selected diseases

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) T H E L A T E S T I N T H E G R O W I N G L I S T O F S U P E R B U G S

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

CAVICIDE1. Technical Bulletin

ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP IN LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES

9/30/2016. Dr. Janell Mayer, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS Dr. Lindsey Votaw, Pharm.D., CGP, BCPS

Gram negative bacteraemia

Aerobic bacterial infections in a burns unit of Sassoon General Hospital, Pune

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spinal Surgery Antibiotic Guidelines. Contents

INFECTION PREVENTION SILVER ANTI-MICROBIAL TEXTILES

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

SYMMETRY ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMING HANDWASH with 0.3% PCMX Technical Data

Dr Vivien CHUANG Associate Consultant Infection Control Branch, Centre for Health Protection/ Infectious Disease Control and Training Center,

UK Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biosciences Available at ISSN:

Research Article Susceptibility Pattern of Isolates from Surgical Ward Patients of A Tertiary Care Referral Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Objectives 6/28/2012. Infection, Antibiotic Use & Antimicrobial Resistance A Common Thread?

Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: A systematic review and meta analysis

Felipe N. Gutierrez MD, MPH Chief, Infectious Diseases Phoenix VA Healthcare

Objectives. Basic Microbiology. Patient related. Environment related. Organism related 10/12/2017

Fundamental Concepts in the Use of Antibiotics. Case. Case. TM is a 24 year old male admitted to ICU after TBI and leg fracture from MVA ICU day 3

What s next in the antibiotic pipeline?

Appropriate Management of Common Pediatric Infections. Blaise L. Congeni M.D. Akron Children s Hospital Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

CUMULATIVE ANTIBIOGRAM

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Two (II) Upon signature

Imagine. Multi-Drug Resistant Superbugs- What s the Big Deal? A World. Without Antibiotics. Where Simple Infections can be Life Threatening

Solution Title: Antibiotic Stewardship: A Journey Toward the Triple Aim

Cellulitis. Assoc Prof Mark Thomas. Conference for General Practice Auckland Saturday 28 July 2018

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital Antimicrobial Criteria Updated 11/16/16

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol Vegetative Bacteria

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Dr.Malik

Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) and Clostridium difficile (C. diff)

Diagnosis: Presenting signs and Symptoms include:

Antimicrobial Resistance. The Case for Diagnostics to Better Direct Therapy

Antimicrobial Stewardship:

Vitek QC Sets. Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets

General Surgery Small Group Activity (Facilitator Notes) Curriculum for Antimicrobial Stewardship

HPN HOSPITALIZED PNEUMONIA APPLICATION

Transcription:

Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS AND QASM PATIENTS (JULY 2011 TO JUNE 2016)

Contact Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality Royal Australasian College of Surgeons PO Box 7476 East Brisbane QLD 4160 Australia Telephone: +61 07 3249 2903 Fax: +61 07 3391 7915 Email: qasm@surgeons.org Website: http://www.surgeons.org/qasm

CONTENTS Introduction... 4 Prevalence of infections... 5 Hospital-acquired infections... 5 Figure 1: Percentage of surgical patients who died with infections and who had acquired those infections in hospital (as reported by surgeons) by year (n=1,588)... 5 LIST 1: Infections acquired in hospital (preoperatively)... 7 LIST 2: Infections acquired in hospital (postoperatively)... 9 LIST 3: Infections acquired in hospital (surgical site)... 12 LIST 4: Infections acquired in hospital (other invasive site)... 14 Case study (hospital-acquired infections)... 15 References... 17 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 3

INTRODUCTION Infections are the modern day challenge of all hospital inpatients, especially in vulnerable patients who (Ref: Hicks, 2016) need surgical care. Hospital-acquired infections in Queensland surgical patients (July 2011 to June 2016) Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are infections patients can get while receiving medical treatment in a healthcare facility they are a (Ref: CDC, 2017) major, yet often preventable, threat to patient safety. Surgeons in Queensland hospitals report on whether or not the surgical patients under their care died with a clinically signifi infection. The Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) audits all surgical deaths in Queensland. This is possible because all surgeons are obliged by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) to participate in the audit as part of the Continuing Professional Development program. All hospitals (public and private) in Queensland participate in QASM. The data in this report is from all hospitals in Queensland. This report covers 3,532 patients reported over fi years (2011/2012 to 2015/216 years) to QASM. Qualifiers Not all audit questions were answered. The data is provided by the surgeons who cared for the patients and not from an infection control program. A limitation of the audit is that it does not collect information on the number of days the patient is in hospital prior to confirmation of the presence of infection. This report does not include non-surgical patients. This report centres on infections acquired during the hospital admission. 4 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

PREVALENCE OF INFECTIONS KEY POINTS More than one-third (34.7%) of surgically-related deaths were associated with an infective process. Nearly two-thirds (58.0%) of those patients, whose death was associated with an infective process, had acquired their infection(s) while in hospital. Infections were most commonly detected in the postoperative period (62.1%; 504/811). A clinically significant infection was present in 34.7% (1,588/4,573) of all surgical patients who died in Queensland hospitals. This percentage has remained steady from 2011/12 to 2015/2016. These infections were acquired either: 1. before admission to hospital (42.0%; 636/1,513), or 2. during the hospital admission (58.0%; 877/1,513). HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS This QASM audit is most interested in the percentage of surgical patients who acquired their infections once they had been admitted to hospital for surgery. There are two different times (preoperatively and postoperatively) and two different sites (surgical sites and other invasive sites) that are reported here about hospital-acquired infections. Although the proportion of surgical patients who died with a clinically significant infection present has been constant over time, the proportion of patients who had infections, and acquired them as inpatients, is steadily increasing. This is a statistically significant trend (see Figure 1). This trend could predict increases in costs for hospital systems and increased risks for patients in the future. (Ref Thaden, 2016) Figure 1: Percentage of surgical patients who died with infections and who had acquired those infections in hospital (as reported by surgeons) by year (n=1,588) Percentage (%) 70 60 54.6% 50 40 30 20 10 57.4% 61.5% 62.7% 0 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Year Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 5

It is clear from the analysis of causative organisms that there are four main types of organisms acquired in hospital that have caused infections in patients who died. Those organisms are: 1. Pseudomonas species 2. Escherichia coli 3. Staphylococcus species 4. Klebsiella species These are predominantly Gram negative organisms, common causes of enteric and urinary tract infections. There were also a high number of Gram positive infections with Staphylococcus species. At present, it is not possible to determine the sources of these infections in the patients who died. It is possible the infections became established in surgical patients because of exposure to pathogens in the hospital environment; it is also possible they occurred because of the inherent physical vulnerability of elderly (Ref Turrentine, 2006) patients experiencing the stresses of surgical procedures. NOTE: Please see Lists 1 to 4. 6 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

LIST 1: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (PREOPERATIVELY) SUMMARY n=158 patients; 56 patients (35.4%) had the infective organisms identified. Many patients had multiple pathogenic organisms present. The top five organisms identified: 1. Staphylococcus species n=14 (8.6%) 2. Klebsiella species n=13 (8.0%) 3. Pseudomonas species n=8 (4.9%) 4. Clostridium species n=4 (2.5%) 5. Streptococcus species n=3 (1.9%) LIST 1: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (PREOPERATIVELY) Clostridium difficile 1 Clostridium difficile 1 Clostridium difficile, colitis 1 Enterobacter (blood culture); Candida (blood culture); E.coli (urine) 1 Enterococcus Enterococcus faecium, VRE Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 Enterococcus faecalis 1 Enterococcus faecium; Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli, Candida, Clostridium 1 Escherichia coli, Mixed enteric contamination 1 Escherichia coli; Clostridium 1 Escherichia coli; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Escherichia coli; Serratia marcescens 1 Fungal: Paecilomyces lilacinus 1 Gram negative bacilli and Yeast 1 Gram negative blood culture Klebsiella. gram positive (aspirate ) 1 Klebsiella 3 Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 Klebsiella; E.coli 1 MRSA; E. coli 1 MRSA; E.coli; Enterobacter; Candida; Aspergilla 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 7

LIST 1: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (PREOPERATIVELY) MRSA; Strep constellatus; mixed enteric 1 Multiple enteric organisms 1 Pantoea agglomerans 1 Proteus mirabilis 1 Pseudomonas 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae 1 Pseudomonas putida; Enterococcus 1 Pseudomonas 1 Pseudomonas; Klebsiella; Enterococcus 1 RSV; Candida 1 Staphylococcus 3 Staphylococcus aureus 2 Staphylococcus aureus (also systemic infection) on background of Cryptococcus 1 Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas 1 Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (coagulase negative) 1 Staphylococcus aureus, Sputum grew. Sacrum grew mixed coliforms + skin flora. 1 Staphylococcus capitis 1 Streptococcus C 1 Streptococcus fusarium 1 Streptococcus intermedius 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported 8 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

LIST 2: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (POSTOPERATIVELY) SUMMARY n=521 patients; 142 patients (27.3%) had infective organisms identified. Many patients had multiple pathogenic organisms present. The top four organisms identified: 1. Pseudomonas species n=30 (5.8%) 2. Escherichia coli n=26 (5.0%) 3. Staphylococcus species n=21 (4.0%) 4. Klebsiella species n=16 (3.1%) LIST 2: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (POSTOPERATIVELY) Acinetobacter 1 Acinetobacter baumannii 1 Bacteroides fragilis 1 Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium clostridioforme 1 Bacteroides thetaiotamicron, Escherichia coli & Pseudomonas 1 Bowel organisms from anastomotic leak 1 Candida 5 Candida albicans & Citrobacter braakii 1 Candida albicans, Pseudomonas; mixed enteric flora 1 Candida glabrata 2 Candida parapsilosis 1 Candida, Pseudomonas 1 Candida; Morganella and Staph. epidermidis 1 Candidaemia 1 Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter 1 Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae 1 Clostridium 1 Clostridium difficile 1 Coagulase negative Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli 1 Coagulase negative Staphylococcus. Streptococcus. Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum 1 Cytomegalovirus 1 Enteric content 1 Enterobacter 2 Enterobacter aerogenes 1 Enterobacter cloacae 5 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 9

LIST 2: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (POSTOPERATIVELY) Enterobacter pneumonia, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus 1 Enterobacter, Enterococcus of mixed bacteria, Candida albicans 1 Enterococcus 3 Enterococcus faecium 1 Enterococcus, Candida 1 Enterococcus, Streptococcus 1 Escherichia coli 12 Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli & Staphylococcus 1 Escherichia coli, Candida 1 Escherichia coli, Enterobacter 1 Escherichia coli, Serratia 1 Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus 1 Escherichia coli, Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; Candida 1 Extended spectrum Beta lactamase 1 Extended spectrum Beta lactamase, Escherichia coli 1 Extended spectrum Beta lactamase, Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus 1 Gram negative bacilli 1 Gram negative bacilli, Hafnia alvei & Candida 1 Gram negative bacteria 1 Herpes simplex virus 1 Influenza A 1 Influenza B 1 Klebsiella 6 Klebsiella & Candida 2 Klebsiella & Pseudomonas 1 Klebsiella & Serratia 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus hominis, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Candida albicans, Vancomycin Resistant Enterobacter; Enterococcus faecium 1 Klebsiella, Candida, Aspergillus fumigates 1 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 1 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus & Escherichia coli 1 Mixed coliforms 1 Mixed enteric organisms, Escherichia coli, Candida, Other mixed flora 1 Moraxella catarrhalis 1 Morganella morganii, Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported 10 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

LIST 2: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (POSTOPERATIVELY) MRSA 1 Multiple organisms at different times 1 Multiple organisms isolated 2 Proteus mirabilis 2 Pseudomonas 8 Pseudomonas & Enterobacter 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 9 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa; candida albicans; lactobacillus and anaerobic gram negative bacilli 1 Pseudomonas putida; Enterobacter cloacae 1 Pseudomonas species, E coli 1 Pseudomonas; Candida 1 Pseudomonas; Enterococcus; Coliform; mixed anaerobic bacteria; Candida albicans 1 Pseudomonas; Proteus; Klebsiella 1 Pseudomonas; VRE 1 Sensitive Staphylococcus Resistant Pseudomonas 1 Serratia marcescens 2 Serratia marcescens, Candida 1 Serratia marsescens, Staphylococcus aureus 1 Staph aureus, sputum blood culture with Citrobacter koseri 1 Staph epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia & Alcaligenes faecalis 1 Staphylococcus aureus 1 Staphylococcus aureus 2 Staphylococcus aureus 1 Staphylococcus aureus /Enterobacter on ETA 1 Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture 1 Staphylococcus aureus; Candida albicans 1 Staphylococcus aureus; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Staphylococcus capitis 1 Staphylococcus hominis (blood culture PICC); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PICC MC&S) 1 Stenotrophomonas 1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 1 Steptococcus pneumoniae 1 Sternatrophamonas 1 Sterotrophomophilis 1 Streptococcus pneumoniae 2 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 11

LIST 3: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (SURGICAL SITE) SUMMARY n=80 patients; 62 patients (77.5%) had infective organisms identified. Many patients had multiple pathogenic organisms present. The top four organisms identified: 1. Staphylococcus species n=15 (18.8%) 2. Candida species n=7 (8.8%) 3. Escherichia coli n=7 (8.8%) 4. Enterobacter species n=6 (7.5%) LIST 3: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (SURGICAL SITE) Candida 1 Candida albicans 1 Candida glabrata Enterococcus Staphylococcus epidermidis Multiple other organisms 1 Candida glabrata; VRE; HSV 1 Candida, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus epidermidis; Candida albicans; Vancomycin resistance Enterobacteriaceae 1 Citrobacter freundii 1 Coagulase negative staphylococcus 1 Deep wound infection Staphylococcus aureus 1 Enterobacter cloacae 1 Enterobacter cloacae 2 Enterococci resistant to Vancomycin 1 Enterococcus, Candida 1 Enterococcus; Enterobacter; candida 1 Escherichia coli 3 Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli (ESBL) 1 Escherichia coli, Enterococcus 1 Escherichia coli, Gram negative bacillus, Gram positive coccus, Enterococcus species 1 Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas; Candida 1 Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis, Clostridium paraputrificum 1 Fungal 1 Gram negative bacilli 1 Gram negative bacillus 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported 12 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

LIST 3: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (SURGICAL SITE) Gram positive cocci, Gram positive bacilli, Candida, Staphylococcus aureus positive 1 Klebsiella & Escherichia coli 1 Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 1 Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 1 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 1 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, mixed enteric flora 1 Mixed enteric 1 Morganella morganii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Haemophilus influenza 1 MRSA 1 Multi-bacterial 1 Multiple 2 Multiple gram negatives 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus 1 Staphylococcus aureus, Morganella morganii 1 Staphylococcus aureus, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Staphylococcus epidermidis 1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Corynebacterium jeikeium 1 Streptococci; Candida 1 Streptococcus anginosus 1 Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus 1 Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus & Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 13

LIST 4: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (OTHER INVASIVE SITE) SUMMARY n=75 patients; 32 patients (42.7%) had infective organism identified. Many patients had multiple pathogenic organisms present. The top three organisms identified: 1. Pseudomonas species n=8 (10.7%) 2. Staphylococcus species n=7 (9.3%) 3. Klebsiella species n=5 (6.7%) LIST 4: INFECTIONS ACQUIRED IN HOSPITAL (OTHER INVASIVE SITE) Candida albicans Yeast 1 Clostridium tertium 1 Escherichia coli 1 Escherichia coli resistant to prescribed antibiotics 1 Gram negative bacilli 1 Klebsiella 3 Klebsiella oxytoca 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 MRSA 1 MRSA /VISA (Vancomycin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus) 1 Multiple Gram negative organisms during admission Pseudomonas and Actinobacter species predominately 1 Pseudomonas 3 Pseudomonas (urine culture) 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa & Enterococcus faecalis infected ascites 1 Rhizopus oryzae 1 Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 1 Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Endocarditis 1 Serratia 1 Serratia Enterococcus Faecalis and candida MRAB 1 Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 Staphylococcus 1 Staphylococcus 1 Staphylococcus aureus 3 Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcus capitis 1 Streptococcus millerii 1 Organisms listed in alphabetical order of first organism reported 14 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

CASE STUDY (HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS) Serious complications occurring after the patient has left hospital should be the primary and immediate responsibility of the treating surgeon. A 63-year-old morbidly obese diabetic patient presented to hospital with pain and weakness of the legs. There was a past history of nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. While an inpatient and over the next week, the patient had CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the spine that showed severe multilevel degeneration with severe spinal canal stenosis in the lower lumbar spine. Eleven days after admission the patient underwent spinal decompression at two levels, and a single level fusion with pedicle screws. Prior to surgery, 1 gram of intravenous Cephazolin was given. The postoperative recovery was slow and apparently without complication. On the night before discharge it was noted by nursing staff that the wound looked inflamed, and that there was a small amount of wound discharge. A swab was taken for culture. The patient was discharged the following day into the care of the local medical officer. At review after 1 week, the local medical officer noted that the wound was infected and thought that treatment with Flucloxacillin was appropriate. The local medical officer was not, however, aware that the pre-discharge wound swab had grown Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The patient was readmitted to hospital two weeks after discharge with pus draining from the surgical wound. The patient subsequently had five surgical washouts and debridement. During the third of these procedures the metalwork was removed from the spine. During this time the patient s health deteriorated and they were admitted to the ICU with pulmonary oedema and signs of sepsis. With continued deterioration it was decided that palliative care was appropriate, and this decision was made in conjunction with family members. The patient died soon after. The cause of death was an extradural abscess and sepsis, which occurred as complications of surgery for degenerative spondylosis with severe spinal stenosis. Considerations This case highlights the need for awareness of hospital-acquired infection, of the risk factors for infection and of prophylactic measures to minimise wound infection. This patient was obese and diabetic both significant risk factors for wound infection. The operative risk factors included the type of surgery spinal surgery with implants; and the duration of surgery more than three hours. The patient was in hospital for 10 days prior to the operation and was almost certainly colonised by hospitalacquired organisms. Prophylaxis was directed towards MRSA. The use of Cephazolin was probably a poor choice under the circumstances and the dosage inadequate for the patient s weight. While the choice of alcoholic Chlorhexadine was appropriate for prepping the skin, the addition of a full surgical scrub of the operation site with Chlorhexadine could have been a prudent precaution. The nursing report of the state of the wound seems to have been dismissed. Any wound that is red and inflamed with a discharge should be considered infected and appropriate measures followed. Although a wound swab was taken and grew MRSA, there was no follow-up. At the time it may have been prudent to keep the patient a few extra days until the culture and sensitivities were available. Although afebrile, a rise in blood sugar level in the two days prior to discharge should have raised awareness of an impending problem. The current trend to discharge a postoperative patient into the care of the GP is fraught with problems, and under some circumstances could be seen as the surgeon discharging his or her responsibilities. A local medical officer is not best qualified to manage late postoperative complications, and may continue to treat the patient to the patient s detriment rather than refer back to the surgeon early. Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 15

Instructions to notify the surgeon immediately should a major complication occur after major surgery might be more prudent than having the GP continue to treat the patient without success. Furthermore, the procedures and clinical pathways of the infection control need to be reviewed. A wound swab grew MRSA yet was not followed up other than to note that handling precautions should be taken the next time the patient attends hospital. Due diligence suggests that the chart should have been reviewed to see what measures had been taken for a wound infection. As the patient had been discharged from hospital, a telephone follow-up would have expedited the return to hospital. By the time the patient was eventually readmitted the outcome was probably inevitable. Comments In summary, the issues that arise from this case are: There should be strong awareness of the risk factors for wound infection particularly MRSA. Consideration that all patients who have been in hospital for more than two or three days are likely to have been colonised by hospital-acquired organisms. The length of stay for a patient who died with a clinically significant infection, was a median of 13 days (IQR 6 days to 25 days); for a patient who did NOT die with a clinically significant infection, it was a median of 7 days (IQR 3 days to 16 days). The use of maximum prophylactic measures Vancomycin should be used for patients who have been in hospital for a period prior to surgery. There should be strong regard for the appearance of the wound inflammation and discharge are signs of infection and should be treated as such, even if subsequently proven to be over-treatment. There should be follow-up of tests such as wound swabs; then treatment instituted when appropriate. 16 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

REFERENCES Hicks CW, Bronsert M, Hammermeister KE, Henderson WG, Gibula DR, Black JH, 3rd, et al. Operative variables are better predictors of postdischarge infections and unplanned readmissions in vascular surgery patients than patient characteristics. J Vasc Surg. 2016. Thaden JT, Li Y, Ruffin F, Maskarinec SA, Hill-Rorie JM, Wanda LC, et al. Increased Costs with Multidrug Resistant Gram Negative Bloodstream Infections Are Primarily Due to Patients with Hospeciesital-Acquired Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016. Turrentine, F. E., et al. (2006). Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203(6): 865-877. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthcare-associated Infections. Healthcare-associated infections data and statistics. Atlanta, USA: CDC.Last updated: 05 October 2016. Accessed: Feb 2017. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/hai/surveillance/index.html Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 17

Notes 18 Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients

Notes Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) hospital-acquired infections and QASM patients 19

Contact Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality Royal Australasian College of Surgeons PO Box 7476 East Brisbane QLD 4160 Australia Telephone: +61 07 3249 2903 Fax: +61 07 3391 7915 Email: qasm@surgeons.org Website: http://www.surgeons.org/qasm