ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Associations Between Initial Antimicrobial Therapy and Medical Outcomes for Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Pneumonia

Similar documents
Measure Information Form

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form

Control emergence of drug-resistant. Reduce costs

GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN ADULTS

4/3/2017 CLINICAL PEARLS: UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Initial Antibiotic Selection and Patient Outcomes: Observations from the National Pneumonia Project

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

ESISTONO LE HCAP? Francesco Blasi. Sezione Medicina Respiratoria Dipartimento Toraco Polmonare e Cardiocircolatorio Università degli Studi di Milano

Antibiotic Therapy and 48-Hour Mortality for Patients with Pneumonia

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Voluntary Only

Antibiotic Therapy for Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia A Systematic Review

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Guidelines for the Initiation of Empirical Antibiotic therapy in Respiratory Disease (Adults)

Suitability of Antibiotic Treatment for CAP (CAPTIME) The duration of antibiotic treatment in community acquired pneumonia (CAP)

What is pneumonia? Infection of the lung parenchyma Causative agents include bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa.

Community-acquired pneumonia: Time to place a CAP on length of treatment?

Cost high. acceptable. worst. best. acceptable. Cost low

Safety of an Out-Patient Intravenous Antibiotics Programme

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

Objectives 4/26/2017. Co-Investigators Sadie Giuliani, PharmD, BCPS Claude Tonnerre, MD Jayme Hartzell, PharmD, MS, BCPS

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Pneumonia considerations Galia Rahav Infectious diseases unit Sheba medical center

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Bai-Yi Chen MD. FCCP

Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

Developed by Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd,CPHQ Developed: October 2009 Most recently updated: December 2014

IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF A GUIDELINE-BASED TREATMENT ALGORITHM FOR COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA (CAP)

Antimicrobial Stewardship:

Guidelines for the Initiation of Empirical Antibiotic therapy in Respiratory Disease (Adults)

General Approach to Infectious Diseases

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Pneumonia Antibiotic Guidance for Adults PAGL Inclusion Approved at January 2017 PGC

Management of Hospital-acquired Pneumonia

Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections Prof. Mohammad Alhumayyd Dr. Aliah Alshanwani

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

Measurement of Antimicrobial Drug Use. Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, PharmD, MHS, FCCP, BCPS DASON Liaison Pharmacist

Appropriate Management of Common Pediatric Infections. Blaise L. Congeni M.D. Akron Children s Hospital Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

CLINICAL PROTOCOL FOR COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA. SCOPE: Western Australia. CORB score equal or above 1. All criteria must be met:

Quality ID #66: Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis National Quality Strategy Domain: Efficiency and Cost Reduction

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Pneumonia. Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): definition. At least 2 new symptoms

Antibiotics Use And Concordance To Guidelines For Patients Hospitalized With Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)

Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Severity scoring and compliance to BTS guidelines. Julie Harris Antibiotic Pharmacist Hywel Dda Healthboard

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common,

Period of study: 12 Nov 2002 to 08 Apr 2004 (first subject s first visit to last subject s last visit)

Jerome J Schentag, Pharm D

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): definition

Compliance with antibiotic treatment guidelines in managed care patients with communityacquired pneumonia in ambulatory settings

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

Antimicrobial Stewardship

TREAT Steward. Antimicrobial Stewardship software with personalized decision support

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Community Acquired Pneumonia. Epidemiology: Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Outline

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile Infection. Jocelyn Srigley, MD, FRCPC November 1, 2012

Duke University Hospital Guideline for Empiric Inpatient Treatment of Cancer- Related Neutropenic Fever in Adult Patients

Combination vs Monotherapy for Gram Negative Septic Shock

Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Antimicrobial treatment of community acquired pneumonia in adults: A conference report

Bacterial Resistance of Respiratory Pathogens. John C. Rotschafer, Pharm.D. University of Minnesota

Treatment Duration for Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The Evidence in Support of 5 Days

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Research & Reviews: Journal of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Doxycycline Is a Cost-effective Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

Epidemiology of early-onset bloodstream infection and implications for treatment

April 25, 2018 Edited by: Gregory K. Perry, PharmD, BCPS-AQID

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Pharmacokinetics. Absorption of doxycycline is not significantly affected by milk or food, but coadministration of antacids or mineral supplements

Incidence of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in patients at risk

Community Acquired Pneumonia: An Update on Guidelines

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Pinni Meedha Mojutho Ammanu Dengina Koduku Part 1 Kama Kathalu

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the second

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

OPTIMIZATION OF PK/PD OF ANTIBIOTICS FOR RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

Host, Syndrome, Bug, Drug: Introducing 2 Frameworks to Approach Infectious Diseases Cases with an Antimicrobial Stewardship Focus

Lifting the lid off CAP guidelines

* gender factor (male=1, female=0.85)

Collecting and Interpreting Stewardship Data: Breakout Session

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Performance Information. Vet use only

DATA COLLECTION SECTION BY FRONTLINE TEAM. Patient Identifier/ Medical Record number (for facility use only)

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

UCSF guideline for management of suspected hospital-acquired or ventilatoracquired pneumonia in adult patients

National Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Obtained from Intensive Care Unit Patients from 1993 to 2002

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ambulatory Care

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Sepsis is the most common cause of death in

Transcription:

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Associations Between Initial Antimicrobial Therapy and Medical Outcomes for Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Pneumonia Patrick P. Gleason, PharmD; Thomas P. Meehan, MD, MPH; Jonathan M. Fine, MD; Deron H. Galusha, MS; Michael J. Fine, MD, MSc Background: Although medical practice guidelines exist, there have been no large-scale studies assessing the relationship between initial antimicrobial therapy and medical outcomes for patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Objective: To determine the associations between initial antimicrobial therapy and 30-day mortality for these patients. Methods: Hospital records for 12 945 Medicare inpatients ( 65 years of age) with pneumonia were reviewed. Associations between initial antimicrobial regimens and 30-day mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics, illness severity, and processes of care. Comparisons were made with patients treated with a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin alone (the reference group). Results: Initial treatment with a second-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.96), a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92), or a fluoroquinolone alone (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) was independently associated with lower 30-day mortality. Adjusted mortality among patients initially treated with these 3 regimens became significantly lower than that in the reference group beginning 2, 3, and 7 days, respectively, after hospital admission. Use of a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus macrolide (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.46) and an aminoglycoside plus another agent (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43) were associated with an increased 30-day mortality. Conclusions: In this study of primarily communitydwelling elderly patients hospitalized with pneumonia, 3 initial empiric antimicrobial regimens were independently associated with a lower 30-day mortality. The more widespread use of these antimicrobial regimens is likely to improve the medical outcomes for elderly patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2562-2572 From the Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Gleason); Qualidigm (formally known as the Connecticut Peer Review Organization), Middletown, Conn (Drs Meehan and J. M. Fine and Mr Galusha); Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Norwalk Hospital, Norwalk, Conn (Dr J. M. Fine); and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr M. J. Fine). EACH YEAR in the United States approximately 4 million adults develop pneumonia, of whom more than 1 million patients are hospitalized. 1-4 In 1993, in-hospital mortality for pneumonia among patients older than 65 years was 10.7 deaths per 100 discharges, and in that year alone $3.5 billion was spent on inpatient care of Medicare patients with this illness. 5 Because of the substantial mortality of pneumonia, particularly among the elderly, it is essential that initial antimicrobial therapy have activity against the causative organism(s). Unfortunately, the causative organism(s) are often unknown at the time antimicrobial therapy is initiated; bacteriological culture results and other microbiological studies are positive in less than 50% of hospitalized patients, even in carefully conducted prospective studies of pneumonia etiology. 6-9 Wide variations in antimicrobial prescribing practices exist for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. 10-13 To reduce this variation and improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have published guidelines for empirical antimicrobial therapy for this See also pages 2511 and 2576 illness. 14,15 However, these guidelines were derived from a limited number of clinical studies of pneumonia etiology and have not been validated in clinical practice. 14-16 Consequently, even the authors of these guidelines have advocated caution in their clinical adoption until the implications for patient outcomes are better understood. 16 2562

PATIENTS AND METHODS STUDY POPULATION The Medicare Quality Indicator System is a Health Care Financing Administration sponsored standardized data collection system developed to assess quality of care for hospitalized patients with specific clinical conditions. The Medicare Quality Indicator System pneumonia module, a national, community-based, retrospective study of pneumonia care in adults aged 65 years and older who were community-dwelling or admitted from an LCF, was initiated in March 1994. 19 SAMPLE SELECTION Sample selection has been described in detail previously. 19 Briefly, from October 1, 1994, through September 30, 1995, potential pneumonia cases were identified by the Health Care Financing Administration from the Medicare National Claims History File if they had a principal discharge diagnosis of pneumonia according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification 20 (ICD-9-CM) codes, or if they had a principal discharge diagnosis of respiratory failure and a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia. With the use of a random selection procedure, 26 000 discharges (500 from each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico) were selected from approximately 650 000 nonfederal, acute care hospital discharges with pneumonia. After potential cases were identified, data were extracted from the medical records to confirm the diagnosis of pneumonia and to apply exclusion criteria. Of the 26 000 potential cases, medical records were obtained from 25 561 (98.3%). Case confirmation required that the patient have an ICD-9-CM code for pneumonia, 21 that a clinician document an initial working diagnosis of pneumonia, and that a chest x-ray examination performed within the first 48 hours after hospital presentation be reported as consistent with pneumonia. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 65 years, had experienced acute care hospitalization within the previous 10 days, were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, had a history of organ transplantation (heart, lung, liver, kidney, or bone marrow), had been exposed to chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy within the previous 2 months, had been transferred from another acute care facility, or had died or been discharged on the date of hospitalization. Patients in whom we could not document delivery of antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours after hospitalization (n = 483), patients whose residence was unknown (n = 68), patients whose 30-day mortality could not be verified (n = 33), and patients with missing information on the exact time of antimicrobial administration or the exact time of blood culture performance (n = 874) were not included in these analyses. For patients with more than 1 pneumonia hospitalization during the study period (n = 113), only the initial episode of pneumonia was included. DATA COLLECTION Hospitals were asked to provide copies of the medical records of potential cases. Trained medical record abstractors collected the data from the medical records by means of an electronic data collection instrument. Abstracted data were merged with hospital claims data provided by the Health Care Financing Administration. Reliability testing indicated moderate to excellent interabstractor agreement, with statistics ranging from 0.48 to 0.95 for pneumonia confirmation and exclusion criteria, clinical characteristics, antimicrobial therapy before hospitalization, timing of initial antimicrobial therapy, and performance of blood cultures within 24 hours of hospitalization. 19 DATA ELEMENTS Five categories of variables were used in this study: (1) case confirmation and exclusion criteria (listed previously), (2) patient characteristics, (3) processes of care, (4) antimicrobial agents prescribed, and (5) medical outcomes. Patient characteristics included demographic characteristics (age, sex, and coming from an LCF), comorbid illnesses (cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, and neoplastic disease excluding skin cancer, liver disease, and renal disease), physical examination findings (abnormal mental status, temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure), and laboratory or radiographic results (arterial ph, serum urea nitrogen level, sodium level, glucose level, hematocrit, PaO 2, and pleural effusion). For purposes of this study, an LCF consisted of a skilled nursing home or a long-term or intermediate care facility. Each patient s risk of 30-day mortality was assessed by means of a validated pneumonia-specific mortality risk index with demonstrated accuracy and discrimination among Medicare patients with pneumonia. 19,22 Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 severity categories (risk classes II-V) based on the presence of the 3 demographic characteristics, 5 comorbid illnesses, 5 physical examination abnormalities, and 7 laboratory or radiographic findings listed above. The physical examination and laboratory values used were the first recorded findings in the initial 24 hours of hospitalization. All other patient characteristics were taken from abstracted data elements except liver disease and neoplastic disease, which were derived from a combination of abstracted data elements and coded secondary ICD-9-CM diagnoses, and renal disease, which was assessed from secondary diagnosis codes. Process of care variables included hospital arrival date and time, blood culture collection date and time, and initial antimicrobial administration date and time. Initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission was defined as ICU treatment with the following procedures documented within 24 Continued on next page To better understand current prescribing practices and to assess associations between empirical antimicrobial therapy and patient outcomes, we designed a study with the following aims: (1) to describe the initial antimicrobial regimens most frequently prescribed for all hospitalized patients, including the subsets of communitydwelling patients and those admitted from long-term care facilities (LCFs), and (2) to assess the associations between initial antimicrobial regimens, 30-day mortality, and other relevant medical outcomes. Our primary hypothesis was that initial antimicrobial therapy, which includes coverage for atypical in addition to typical bac- 2563

hours of arriving at the hospital: insertion of an endotracheal tube, respiratory tract intubation, continuous positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation, pulmonary artery catheterization or monitoring, cardiac output determination by thermodilution, or central venous catheter monitoring. Use of all antimicrobial agents was assessed from abstracted data. For each antimicrobial agent prescribed, the date and time of the first dose were recorded; however, the route of administration and discontinuation date were not recorded. The initial antimicrobial regimen was defined as all antimicrobial agents used during the first 48 hours after arrival at the hospital. The cause of pneumonia was defined by the presence of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for Streptococcus pneumoniae, gram-negative bacilli (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), Haemophilus influenzae, staphylococcal species (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis), viral pneumonia, fungal pneumonia, Pneumocystis carinii, aspiration pneumonia, miscellaneous organisms, and unknown etiology. 21 High-risk pneumonia etiology was defined as gram-negative rod, staphylococcal species, or aspiration pneumonia. 17,23 Outcome variables were the date of hospital discharge, date of subsequent hospitalization if applicable, and date of death. Mortality data were obtained from the Medicare Enrollment Database, and rehospitalization was assessed by means of Medicare part A claims. Mortality was defined as death within 30 days from the date of the index hospitalization. Length of stay (LOS) was defined as the discharge date minus the admission date. Rehospitalization was defined as any hospitalization within 30 days from the discharge date of the index hospitalization. Assessments of hospital (LOS) and rehospitalization were limited to patients surviving the index hospitalization for pneumonia who were not directly transferred to another acute care hospital. METHODS OF ANALYSIS Associations between patient outcomes (ie, mortality, rehospitalization, and LOS) and initial antimicrobial regimens that accounted for greater than 1% of all initial regimens were assessed in all patients and in 2 patient subsets. These 2 patient subsets consisted of patients who were (1) community-dwelling (n = 9751) and (2) LCF-dwelling (n = 3194). Associations between patient outcomes and initial antimicrobial regimens were also assessed by stratification according to severity risk classes. Because of the small number of patients in risk class II (n = 1189), patients in risk classes II and III were combined (n = 4099). For categorical data, proportions were compared by means of the Pearson 2 test. For each antimicrobial regimen, testing for trends in frequency of antimicrobial regimen use by severity risk class was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel 2 test for trend. For continuous data (eg, LOS), we calculated medians with interquartile ranges and means with SDs. All LOS analyses were performed with the log transformation of the actual LOS as the dependent variable. The independent associations between initial antimicrobial regimens and 30-day mortality were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each initial antimicrobial regimen, adjusting for the following independent variables: antimicrobial therapy before hospitalization, 4 baseline pneumonia severity risk classes, arrival from an LCF, initiation of antimicrobial therapy within 8 hours of hospital arrival, performance of blood cultures within 24 hours of hospitalarrival, regionofenrollmentwithintheunitedstates, ICU treatment on day 1 of hospitalization, change in antimicrobial therapy after the initial 48 hours of hospitalization, and highrisk pneumonia etiology. With the exception of previous antimicrobial therapy and region of enrollment, all of these patientcharacteristicsandprocessmeasureshavepreviouslybeen shown to have a significant association with short-term mortality in patients with pneumonia. 19 Significant 2-way interactions between ICU treatment and high-risk etiology, ICU treatment and risk class, and coming from an LCF and highrisketiologywereidentifiedandusedasindependentvariables in the Cox proportional hazards models. The reference category used for initial antimicrobial regimen was therapy with a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only (ie, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, orceftizoxime), aninitialregimenrecommended by the ATS and the IDSA guidelines for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe pneumonia. 15,16 Log-log survival plots were constructed to assess the proportionality assumption underlying the Cox models. 24 The results of all Cox models were confirmed by logistic regression, indicating that our results were insensitive to modeling technique. 25 To further assess the association between initial antimicrobial regimen and 30-day mortality, 2 separate Cox models were performed in community-dwelling patients (n = 9751) and patients admitted from an LCF (n = 3194). In addition, 3 separate Cox models were performed in patients in risk classes II and III (n = 4099), patients in risk class IV (n = 5711), and patients in risk class V (n = 3135). All of the previously described independent variables used in the overall Cox model were used in these analyses. We varied our definition of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy, specifying it as antimicrobial therapy in the first 8 hours and 24 hours of hospital admission to ensure that our results were insensitive to the time threshold used. We also excluded the 171 patients who died within 48 hours of hospital admission, since initial antibiotic therapy is unlikely to have influenced their mortality. To assess the independent associations between initial antimicrobial regimens and other medical outcomes (ie, LOS and 30-day rehospitalization), linear regression analysis was used when the dependent variable was LOS and Cox modeling was used when the dependent variable was rehospitalization. All independent variables used in the Cox models for mortality were used in these analyses. terial pathogens, would be associated with lower 30-day mortality. We made an explicit decision to separately assess the impact of initial antimicrobial therapy on medical outcomes among patients admitted from the community and from LCFs caused by differences in sociodemographic factors, comorbidity, illness severity, and pneumonia etiology across these patient subsets. 6,17,18 RESULTS The study population was composed of 12 945 eligible patients: 9751 (75.3%) community-dwelling and 3194 (24.7%) admitted from an LCF. Study patients had a mean (±SD) age of 79.4 ± 8.1 years; 84.4% were white, and 50.7% were female (Table 1). The majority of patients (58.1%) 2564

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population Characteristic Community Dwelling (n = 9751) Long-term Care Facility Dwelling* (n = 3194) Total Study Cohort (N = 12 945) Demographics Age, mean, y 78.1 83.5 79.4 Race, % white 84.3 84.9 84.4 Sex, % female 48.5 57.2 50.7 Comorbid illness, % Congestive heart failure 25.3 34.6 27.6 Coronary artery disease 25.5 30.4 26.7 Cerebrovascular disease 15.8 35.1 20.6 Neoplastic disease 9.3 6.8 8.7 Chronic renal disease 2.9 4.6 3.3 Chronic liver disease 0.9 0.7 0.8 Physical examination findings, % Altered mental status 9.4 47.7 18.9 Respiratory rate 30/min 23.2 33.9 25.9 Pulse 125 beats/min 10.1 11.4 10.4 Systolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg 2.4 6.0 3.3 Temperature 35 C or 40 C 1.6 2.2 1.8 Laboratory and radiographic results, % Serum urea nitrogen 10.7 mmol/l ( 30 mg/dl) 19.5 42.2 25.1 Glucose 13.9 mmol/l ( 250 mg/dl) 7.3 9.5 7.8 Hematocrit 0.30 6.3 10.1 7.2 Sodium 130 mmol/l 5.4 5.2 5.3 PaO 2 60 mm Hg 22.0 19.4 21.4 Arterial ph 7.35 6.9 9.8 7.6 Pleural effusion 19.1 19.4 19.2 Antimicrobial therapy, % Previous antimicrobial therapy 24.4 34.0 26.8 Antimicrobial therapy initiated 8 h 80.9 80.4 80.8 Blood cultures within 24 h of hospital arrival, % 65.7 71.1 67.1 Intensive care unit treatment, day 1 of admission, % 2.6 2.8 2.7 Severity of illness risk classification, % Risk class II 11.5 0.3 8.7 Risk class III 28.7 5.4 22.9 Risk class IV 44.7 42.4 44.1 Risk class V 15.1 52.0 24.2 Pneumonia etiology, % Streptococcus pneumoniae 7.5 3.9 6.6 Haemophilus influenzae 4.7 2.5 4.1 Staphyloccocal species 2.8 6.0 3.6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3.3 3.8 3.4 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1.9 2.3 2.0 Other 3.7 2.5 3.4 Aspiration pneumonia 5.9 22.9 10.1 Unknown 63.0 52.8 60.5 *Admission from a long-term care facility consisted of residence at a skilled nursing home, intermediate care, or long-term care facility before hospitalization. All other patients were defined as community dwelling. Statistically significant differences ( P.05) between patient subsets (ie, community dwelling and long-term care facility dwelling) were identified by the 2 test with the exception of age, where an unpaired t test was used. Risk class was determined according to the methods of Fine et al. 22 There were no risk class I patients, who by definition are all younger than 50 years. Other microbiological etiology included viral pneumonia (n = 93), fungal pneumonia (n = 53), Pneumocystis carinii (n = 2), and pneumonia due to other unspecified organisms (n = 263). had at least 1 comorbid illness, and 68.3% were in the 2 highest severity risk classes (IV and V) at initial examination. The most frequently coded bacteriological pathogens were S pneumoniae (6.6%), and H influenzae (4.1%); 10.1% of patients were coded as having aspiration pneumonia and 60.5%, an unknown pneumonia etiology. In comparison with community-dwelling patients, patients admitted from an LCF were older and had a higher prevalence of the most prevalent comorbid illnesses and a substantially higher prevalence of altered mental status, vital sign abnormalities, laboratory abnormalities, and high-risk etiology. More than 94% of all patients admitted from an LCF were in risk classes IV and V. INITIAL ANTIMICROBIAL REGIMENS The 3 most commonly used initial antimicrobial regimens were a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime) in 26.5%, a second-generation cephalosporin only (cefuroxime) in 12.3%, and a non-pseudomonal third-gen- 2565

Table 2. Use of Initial Antimicrobial Regimens and 30-Day Mortality by Admission Source* Prevalence of Antimicrobial Regimen, % 30-d Mortality, % (95% CI) Initial Antimicrobial Regimens Community Dwelling (n = 9751) LCF Dwelling (n = 3194) Total Study Cohort (N = 12 945) Community Dwelling (n = 9751) LCF Dwelling (n = 3194) Total Study Cohort (N = 12 945) First-generation cephalosporin only 3.7 2.4 3.3 9.8 (6.9-13.3) 19.7 (11.4-30.4) 11.6 (8.7-14.9) Second-generation cephalosporin only 13.5 8.7 12.3 9.3 (7.7-10.9) 23.5 (18.6-28.9) 11.7 (10.1-13.4) Pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only 1.6 2.2 1.7 10.6 (6.2-16.6) 29.0 (18.6-41.1) 16.4 (11.7-21.9) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins only 25.6 29.2 26.5 10.7 (9.5-11.9) 26.2 (23.4-29.1) 14.9 (13.7-16.1) (reference group) Ceftriaxone 17.8 20.1 18.4 9.8 (8.4-11.2) 27.3 (23.8-30.8) 14.5 (13.1-15.9) Cefotaxime 6.6 7.7 6.9 12.9 (10.4-15.7) 24.5 (19.2-30.3) 16.1 (13.7-18.7) Ceftizoxime 1.0 0.9 0.9 10.8 (5.3-18.8) 20.7 (8.0-39.7) 13.1 (7.7-20.4) -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors only 6.7 9.8 7.5 14.1 (11.4-16.9) 27.7 (22.8-33.0) 18.5 (16.0-21.0) Ampicillin/sulbactam 3.9 5.4 4.3 13.4 (10.1-17.2) 22.0 (16.0-28.8) 16.1 (13.1-19.3) Ticarcillin/clavulanate 2.4 3.8 2.8 14.5 (10.2-19.6) 33.9 (25.5-43.0) 21.1 (16.9-25.6) Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.3 0.6 0.4 15.2 (5.1-31.8) 36.8 (16.2-61.6) 23.1 (12.5-36.8) Macrolides only 2.2 0.8 1.8 8.6 (5.2-13.2) 20.0 (6.8-40.7) 9.8 (6.3-14.3) Erythromycin 1.1 0.6 1.0 10.8 (5.7-18.1) 11.1 (1.4-34.7) 10.9 (6.1-17.5) Clarithromycin 0.7 0.1 0.6 4.3 (0.9-12.0) 25.0 (0.6-80.5) 5.4 (1.5-13.2) Azithromycin 0.2 0.1 0.2 14.3 (3.0-36.3) 50.0 (1.3-98.7) 17.4 (5.0-38.7) Second-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide 5.0 1.7 4.2 7.8 (5.6-10.5) 13.0 (5.4-24.9) 8.4 (6.2-11.0) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins plus 10.2 4.6 8.8 6.8 (5.3-8.6) 24.3 (17.6-32.0) 9.1 (7.5-10.9) macrolide Ceftriaxone + macrolide 7.0 3.2 6.1 7.2 (5.3-9.3) 18.8 (11.7-27.8) 8.7 (6.8-10.8) Cefotaxime + macrolide 2.5 1.1 2.2 6.5 (3.8-10.8) 40.0 (23.8-57.8) 10.7 (7.3-14.9) Ceftizoxime + macrolide 0.5 0.3 0.4 4.3 (0.5-14.5) 37.5 (8.5-75.5) 9.1 (3.0-19.9) -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors plus macrolide 1.6 0.8 1.4 17.8 (12.0-24.7) 50.0 (29.1-70.8) 22.2 (16.2-29.0) Ampicillin/sulbactam + macrolide 0.9 0.3 0.8 14.8 (8.1-23.9) 40.0 (12.1-73.7) 17.4 (10.4-26.3) Ticarcillin/clavulanate + macrolide 0.6 0.3 0.5 24.1 (13.4-37.6) 60.0 (26.2-87.8) 29.7 (18.9-42.4) Piperacillin/tazobactam + macrolide 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.0 (0.3-44.5) 33.0 (0.8-90.5) 15.4 (1.9-45.4) Fluoroquinolones only 1.7 2.7 2.0 7.1 (3.7-12.0) 17.4 (10.1-27.1) 10.6 (7.1-14.9) Ciprofloxacin 1.2 2.1 1.4 6.7 (2.9-12.8) 15.2 (7.5-26.1) 9.7 (5.9-14.9) Ofloxacin 0.5 0.6 0.5 7.8 (2.2-18.8) 21.1 (6.1-45.5) 11.4 (5.1-21.2) Aminoglycosides plus any other antimicrobial agent(s) 5.3 10.1 6.5 18.2 (14.9-21.7) 33.1 (28.0-38.5) 24.0 (21.0-26.9) All other regimens 23.1 27.1 24.1 13.6 (12.2-15.1) 30.7 (27.6-33.8) 18.4 (17.0-19.7) Total NA NA NA 11.2 (10.0-11.9) 27.5 (26.5-29.1) 15.3 (14.6-15.9) *CI indicates confidence interval; LCF, long-term care facility; and NA, not applicable. Percentages for the individual antimicrobial agents within antimicrobial regimens may not sum to the total category percentage because of rounding error. The specific antimicrobial agents associated with these regimens were cefazolin for first-generation cephalosporin only; cefuroxime for second-generation cephalosporin only; ceftazidime for pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only; erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin for macrolides; and gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin for aminoglycosides. LCF denotes admission from a long-term care facility. Admission from an LCF consisted of residence at a skilled nursing home, intermediate care facility, or LCF before hospitalization. All other patients were defined as community dwelling. Statistically significant differences ( P.05) between the 2 patient subsets (ie, community dwelling and LCF dwelling) for comparisons of frequency of use of intial antimicrobial regimens by means of the 2 test. The all other regimens category comprised a total of 851 unique antimicrobial regimens. The most frequent regimens were ceftriaxone plus cefuroxime (n = 97), imipenem/cilastatin only (n = 87), and cefotetan only (n = 67). eration cephalosporin (as above) plus a macrolide in 8.8% (Table 2). Significant differences in the prevalence of use of virtually all initial antimicrobial regimens existed across the 2 patient subsets (P.05). Initial therapy with a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only, a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor only, a fluoroquinolone only, or an aminoglycoside plus another agent was more common among patients admitted from an LCF. Significant differences in the choice of initial antimicrobial regimens existed between the northeastern, southern, midwestern, and western regions of the country (defined by the US Census Bureau) for 10 of the 12 initial regimens. 26 The absolute differences in use were minimal with the exception of the northeastern region, where more second-generation cephalosporins alone or in combination with a macrolide were used and fewer nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins alone or in combination with a macrolide than the other 3 regions (data not shown). Associations between initial antimicrobial regimen and baseline severity of illness existed for 8 of the 12 commonly prescribed regimens (Table 3). Treatment with a first- or second-generation cephalosporin only, a macrolide only, and a second- or non-pseudomonal thirdgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide occurred less frequently with increasing illness severity. Treatment with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor only, an aminoglycoside plus any other antimicrobial agent, and the other antimicrobial agent category occurred more frequently with increasing severity of illness at hospital arrival. 2566

Table 3. Use of Initial Antimicrobial Regimens and 30-Day Mortality by Severity Risk Class* Prevalence of Antimicrobial Regimen, % 30-d Mortality, % (95% CI) Initial Antimicrobial Regimens Risk Classes II/III (n = 4099) Risk Class IV (n = 5711) Risk Class V (n = 3135) Risk Classes II/III (n = 4099) Risk Class IV (n = 5711) Risk Class V (n = 3135) First-generation cephalosporin only 4.1 3.3 2.5 3.6 (1.3-7.7) 12.1 (7.8-17.6) 27.3 (17.7-38.6) Second-generation cephalosporin only 13.4 13.0 9.6 3.6 (2.2-5.6) 10.3 (8.2-12.8) 29.8 (24.7-35.3) Pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only 1.4 2.0 1.5 3.4 (0.4-11.7) 14.2 (8.3-22.0) 37.5 (24.0-52.6) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins only 26.4 26.6 26.4 3.3 (2.3-4.6) 12.4 (10.8-14.2) 34.7 (31.5-38.1) (reference group) -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors only 5.9 7.8 9.1 2.9 (1.2-5.9) 15.3 (12.1-19.0) 36.6 (31.0-42.5) Macrolides only 2.9 1.7 0.6 3.4 (0.9-8.4) 15.2 (8.7-23.7) 22.2 (6.4-47.6) Second-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide 5.4 4.1 2.6 2.2 (0.7-5.2) 10.2 (6.6-14.8) 19.8 (11.7-30.1) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins 10.4 9.2 6.0 1.2 (0.4-2.7) 8.5 (6.3-11.2) 28.6 (22.2-35.6) plus macrolide -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors plus macrolide 1.6 1.3 1.2 6.0 (1.6-14.6) 29.2 (19.0-41.1) 37.8 (22.5-55.2) Fluoroquinolones only 2.2 1.9 1.8 4.4 (1.2-10.8) 9.4 (4.6-16.5) 22.8 (12.7-35.8) Aminoglycosides plus any other antimicrobial 4.1 6.0 10.4 6.5 (3.3-11.4) 19.6 (15.6-24.3) 37.5 (32.3-43.0) agent(s) All other regimens 22.2 23.1 28.4 3.5 (2.4-4.9) 15.9 (14.0-18.0) 37.2 (34.0-40.5) Total mortality for all regimens NA NA NA 3.3 (2.8-3.9) 13.4 (12.5-14.3) 34.3 (32.6-35.9) *CI indicates confidence interval; NA, not applicable. Risk classes were determined according to the methods of Fine et al. 22 There were no risk class I patients, who by definition, are all younger than 50 years. The specific antimicrobial agents associated with these regimens were cefazolin for first-generation cephalosporin only; cefuroxime for second-generation cephalosporin only; ceftazidime for pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only; ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftizoxime for non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins; ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanate, or piperacillin/tazobactam for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors; erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin for macrolides; ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin for fluoroquinolones; and gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin for aminoglycosides. P.05 for comparisons of frequency of use of initial antimicrobial regimens by risk class were calculated by the 2 test for trend. The all other regimens category comprised a total of 851 unique antimicrobial regimens. The most frequent regimens were ceftriaxone plus cefuroxime (n = 97), imipenem/cilastatin only (n = 87), and cefotetan only (n = 67). ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN INITIAL ANTIMICROBIAL REGIMENS AND MORTALITY Thirty-day mortality was 15.3% (95% CI, 14.6%- 15.9%) in the entire study population, ranging from 11.2% (95% CI, 10.6%-11.9%) in community-dwelling patients to 27.5% (95% CI, 26.0%-29.1%) among patients admitted from an LCF (Table 2). Mortality ranged from 8.9% for patients who initially received a second-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide to 24.0% for those who received a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide. Higher 30-day mortality rates were observed among patients admitted from an LCF for all of the initial antimicrobial regimens, with significantly higher rates observed for 8 regimens. Increasing risk class was strongly associated with increased 30-day mortality, as follows: class II and III, 3.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-3.9%); class IV, 13.4% (95% CI, 12.5%-14.3%); and class V, 34.3% (95% CI, 32.6%- 35.9%) (P.001, 2 for trend) (Table 3). With the exception of initial therapy with a fluoroquinolone only in risk classes II and III, the point estimates for 30-day mortality stratified by severity class for fluoroquinolones only, second-generation cephalosporins plus macrolide, and non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins plus macrolide were consistently lower than the reference category (ie, non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins only), while the stratified point estimates for 30-day mortality for -lactam/ -lacatamase inhibitors plus macrolide and aminoglycosides plus any other agent were consistently higher than the reference category. Five initial antimicrobial regimens were identified as having an independent association with 30-day mortality (Table 4). Use of a second-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96), a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92), or a fluoroquinolone only (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) were independently associated with a lower 30-day mortality. Use of a -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.46) and an aminoglycoside plus another agent (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43) were independently associated with a higher 30-day mortality. The adjusted mortality associated with initial treatment with a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (P.05), a second-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (P.05), or a fluoroquinolone only (P.05) was significantly lower than the mortality in the reference group on days 2, 3, and 7 after hospitalization, respectively, and remained lower throughout the 30-day follow-up period (Figure). In contrast, the adjusted mortality for initial treatment with an aminoglycoside plus any other agent (P.05) or a -lactam/ lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide (P.05) was significantly higher than the mortality in the reference group on days 4 and 7, respectively, and continued to exceed the mortality in the reference group during the remaining time of the 30-day follow-up. 2567

Table 4. Independent Associations Between Initial Antimicrobial Regimens and 30-Day Mortality Among the Total Study Cohort and Stratified by Source of Admission Initial Antimicrobial Regimens Total Study Cohort (N = 12 945) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI)* Community Dwelling (n = 9751) LCF Dwelling (n = 3194) First-generation cephalosporin only 0.92 (0.69-1.23) 0.99 (0.70-1.41) 0.79 (0.47-1.34) Second-generation cephalosporin only 0.89 (0.75-1.05) 0.88 (0.71-1.10) 0.90 (0.68-1.19) Pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only 1.12 (0.80-1.57) 0.87 (0.52-1.44) 1.43 (0.91-2.27) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins only Reference group Reference group Reference group -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors only 1.07 (0.91-1.28) 1.09 (0.86-1.38) 1.07 (0.84-1.37) Macrolides only 1.06 (0.69-1.61) 1.07 (0.66-1.73) 1.06 (0.44-2.58) Second-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide 0.71 (0.52-0.96) 0.78 (0.56-1.10) 0.49 (0.23-1.04) Non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins 0.74 (0.60-0.92) 0.66 (0.51-0.86) 0.95 (0.67-1.34) plus macrolide -Lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors plus macrolide 1.77 (1.28-2.46) 1.61 (1.08-2.39) 2.24 (1.24-4.04) Fluoroquinolones only 0.64 (0.43-0.94) 0.64 (0.36-1.14) 0.64 (0.38-1.09) Aminoglycosides plus any other antimicrobial 1.21 (1.02-1.43) 1.29 (1.02-1.65) 1.16 (0.92-1.46) agent(s) All other regimens 1.12 (0.99-1.27) 1.11 (0.94-1.31) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) *The hazard ratios shown are the hazards of dying within 30 days of hospitalization among patients who received the antimicrobial regimen listed compared with patients who received a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only (ie, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftizoxime). All hazard ratios were adjusted for severity risk class, admission from community or LCF (for the overall model), previous antimicrobial use, region of enrollment, intensive care unit treatment on day 1 of hospitalization, performance of blood cultures within 24 hours of hospitalization, initiation of antimicrobial therapy within 8 hours of hospitalization, high-risk pneumonia etiology (gram-negative rod, staphylococcal species, or aspiration pneumonia), and change in antimicrobial therapy after 48 hours of hospitalization. CI indicates confidence interval. The specific antimicrobial agents associated with these regimens were cefazolin for first-generation cephalosporin only; cefuroxime for second-generation cephalosporin only; ceftazidime for pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin only; ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftizoxime for non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins; ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanate, or piperacillin/tazobactam for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors; erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin for macrolides; ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin for fluoroquinolones; and gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin for aminoglycosides. LCF denotes admission from a long-term care facility. Admission from an LCF consisted of residence at a skilled nursing home, intermediate care facility, or LCF before hospitalization. All other patients were defined as community dwelling. Two separate Cox models were performed in community-dwelling patients and patients admitted from an LCF (Table 4). The HRs for 30-day mortality were very similar in these 2 subsets and in the overall study population, with the exception of non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins plus a macrolide. This initial regimen had an HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.86) for communitydwelling patients and an HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.67-1.34) for patients admitted from an LCF. Treatment with a secondgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide and a fluoroquinolone only was associated with a lower 30-day mortality in both models (not statistically significant). Treatment with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide was independently associated with higher 30-day mortality in both models, while treatment with an aminoglycoside plus another agent was associated with a significantly higher (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65) 30-day mortality among community-dwelling patients and a nonsignificantly higher mortality among patients admitted from an LCF. Separate Cox models of 30-day mortality performed for patients in severity risk classes II-III, IV, and V were consistent with the findings from the model performed in the total study population. Although few of the associations between initial antimicrobial regimen and mortality were statistically significant because of the relatively small number of patients within cells, the point estimates for the HRs derived in these risk class specific models had a similar direction and magnitude of effect as those derived from the model in the total study population. IMPACT OF THE DEFINITION OF INITIAL ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY ON 30-DAY MORTALITY Modifications in antimicrobial therapy were observed in 8117 patients (62.7%) after the first 8 hours of hospital admission, 5985 (46.2%) after the first 24 hours, and 4760 (36.8%) after the first 48 hours. From 8 to 48 hours after hospital admission, there was a 38% to 14% absolute decrease in the use of single-agent antimicrobial regimens and a 45% to 74% increase in the use of combination regimens. Our findings of the association between initial antimicrobial regimen and 30-day mortality were insensitive to our definition of the initial regimen. A model that used an 8-hour post hospital admission threshold to define initial antimicrobial therapy identified a significantly lower 30-day mortality among patients treated with a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97) and an independent association with higher 30-day mortality among patients treated with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.61) and the all other antimicrobial regimens category (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43). The HRs for 30-day mortality associated with a second-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51-1.15), a fluoroquinolone only (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.19), and an aminoglycoside plus any other agent (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.90-1.38) were consistent with 2568

the corresponding HRs estimated when the 48-hour definition of initial therapy was used (although not statistically significant). The HRs observed with a 24-hour threshold used to define initial therapy were nearly identical to those estimated with the 8-hour definition (data not shown). Our findings were also insensitive to the exclusion of the 171 patients who died within the first 2 days of hospitalization. As in the original model, 30-day mortality was significantly lower with initial treatment with a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99) and a fluoroquinolone only (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.97) and significantly higher with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.29-2.55) and an aminoglycoside plus another agent (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51). The HR for treatment with a second-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide was consistent with the results of the original model (although not statistically significant), while the all other antimicrobial regimens category was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality in these analyses (data not shown). ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN INITIAL ANTIMICROBIAL REGIMENS AND OTHER MEDICAL OUTCOMES Among the 11 432 patients discharged alive from the index hospitalization and not transferred to another acute care hospital, the median LOS (interquartile range) was 7 (5 to 10) days, ranging from 7 (5 to 9) days among community-dwelling patients to 8 (6 to 11) days among patients admitted from an LCF. The 30-day rehospitalization rate was 15.9% (95% CI, 15.3%-16.6%), ranging from 15.5% (95% CI, 14.8%-16.3%) in community-dwelling patients to 17.2% (95% CI, 15.8%-18.7%) in patients admitted from an LCF. Initial therapy with a pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin alone, a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor alone, a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide, an aminoglycoside plus another agent, and the other category of antimicrobial agents were all independently associated with a longer LOS for the index hospitalization; no regimen was associated with a significantly shorter LOS. Initial therapy with an aminoglycoside plus another agent was associated with an increased rehospitalization rate within 30 days after discharge from the index hospitalization; no regimen was independently associated with decreased rehospitalization. COMMENT This national study of antimicrobial therapy for elderly patients hospitalized with pneumonia demonstrated that initial therapy with a non-pseudomonal thirdgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide, a secondgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide, or a fluoroquinolone alone was associated with 26%, 29%, and 36% lower 30-day mortality, respectively. Yet, only 15.0% of all patients received 1 of these 3 initial regimens. An additional 7.9% were treated with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide or an aminoglycoside plus another agent, which had mortality rates 77% and 21% Adjusted Mortality Non-pseudomonal Third-Generation Cephalosporin Only (Reference Group) Second-Generation Cephalosoporin Plus Macrolide Non-pseudomonal Third-Generation Cephalosporin Plus Macrolide β-lactam/β-lactamase Inhibitor Plus Macrolide Fluoroquinolone Only Aminoglycoside Plus Any Other Agent 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days From Hospital Admission Adjusted mortality within 30 days of hospital admission for the 5 antimicrobial regimens with an independent association with 30-day mortality based on a Cox model for mortality in the overall study population (N = 12 945). The Cox model adjusted for severity risk class, admission from a community or a long-term care facility, previous antimicrobial use, region of enrollment, intensive care unit treatment on day 1 of hospitalization, performance of blood cultures within 24 hours of hospitalization, initiation of antimicrobial therapy within 8 hours of hospitalization, high-risk pneumonia etiology (gram-negative rod, staphylococcal species, or aspiration pneumonia), and change in antimicrobial therapy after 48 hours of hospitalization. higher than the reference group, respectively. These findings suggest that opportunities exist to dramatically improve the quality of care for hospitalized elderly patients with pneumonia by modifying existing initial antimicrobial prescribing practices. The 3 initial antimicrobial regimens associated with a decreased mortality in the overall study population were also associated with a 22% to 36% lower mortality among community-dwelling patients and a 5% to 51% lower mortality among patients admitted from an LCF. In the 75.3% of the entire population who were community-dwelling before hospitalization, only initial therapy with a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide was independently associated with a lower 30- day mortality despite trends toward lower mortality in community-dwelling patients treated with a secondgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone alone. The associations between initial antimicrobial therapy and mortality among LCF-dwelling patients were very similar to the associations in the overall study population, with the exception of nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins plus macrolide. We believe the lack of statistically significant associations between initial antimicrobial regimens and 30- day mortality in these 2 subsets of patients was caused by smaller sample sizes reducing statistical power rather than systematic differences in these associations. Alternatively, initial antimicrobial therapy may not influence 2569

short-term mortality among patients with severe disease or with a greater prevalence of comorbid illnesses such as those admitted from LCFs. 27,28 This alternative explanation is not supported by our findings that treatment with a second- or non-pseudomonal thirdgeneration cephalosporin plus a macrolide was associated with an improved survival beginning within 2 to 3 days after hospital admission and persisting throughout the 30-day follow-up period. OUR FINDINGS confirm our hypothesis that initial antimicrobial regimens with activity against the most common typical bacterial pathogens (eg, S pneumoniae and H influenzae) and atypical pathogens (eg, Legionella species, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Coxiella burnetti) are associated with a decreased 30-day mortality. These findings are supported by recent studies of pneumonia etiology, which showed a high prevalence of atypical pathogens especially among hospitalized elderly. 9 The prevalence of atypical pneumonia resulting in hospitalization is as high as 44%, with M pneumoniae accounting for 33% and C pneumoniae, 9%. 9,29-31 Moreover, contrary to the historical belief that atypical pathogens are associated with a universally favorable prognosis, a recent study demonstrated that C pneumoniae was responsible for deadly outbreaks of pneumonia among nursing home residents. 32 The finding of an association between use of fluoroquinolones alone (ie, ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin) and lower 30-day mortality is surprising given reported in vitro resistance of S pneumoniae to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, ranging from to 3% to 32%. 33-35 However, reported in vitro resistance of S pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones may be attributed to minimum inhibitory concentrations that overlap susceptibility break points and not to in vivo drug resistance. 36 Our findings may underestimate the actual survival benefit of this class of antimicrobial agents given that many of the newer fluoroquinolones (eg, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin) have greater activity against S pneumoniae and S aureus, in addition to providing excellent coverage of the atypical bacterial pathogens. However, the potential survival advantage associated with this class of antimicrobial agents must be balanced with the problem of increased bacterial resistance that could result if fluoroquinolones are used widely to treat this common illness. 37 Although many difficult-to-treat pathogens, such as S aureus and P aeruginosa, were exquisitely sensitive to this class of agents when first introduced, within 5 years of introduction, drug resistance began to develop. 38-40 Therefore, judicious use of fluoroquinolones for treatment of pneumonia is strongly recommended. Our finding of a 77% higher 30-day mortality among patients initially treated with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide, an association that remained statistically significant among community- and LCFdwelling patients, raises concerns for use of this regimen. Although one potential explanation of this finding is that patients treated with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor plus a macrolide differed from those treated with other initial antimicrobial regimens, patients treated with this initial regimen were not systematically more severely ill at the time of hospital arrival. In fact, with the exception of a slightly higher rate of ICU treatment within 24 hours of hospital arrival (6.3% vs 2.6% for all other regimens), these patients had significantly lower rates of coming from an LCF, less cerebrovascular disease, less altered mental status at hospital arrival, and a significantly greater proportion in the 2 lowest severity risk classes (II and III) at hospital arrival. Another possible explanation for this positive association with mortality is that this regimen was used more often for patients with a presumptive diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. However, higher use of this regimen was not demonstrated among patients with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for aspiration pneumonia. Alternatively, the increased mortality associated with this initial regimen may be explained by deterioration of patients conditions because of the -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors lack of activity against penicillinresistant S pneumoniae and ampicillin/sulbactam s limited activity against gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae (eg, K pneumoniae). 41,42 Moreover, it is possible that unrecognized pathogens with differing susceptibility patterns to second- or non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins plus a macrolide compared with -lactam/ lactamase inhibitors plus a macrolide exist. Unfortunately, our data cannot be used to either support or refute the latter 2 hypotheses. One puzzling question raised by this study is why initial therapy with -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitors alone was not associated with an increased 30-day mortality, while the same class of agents in combination with a macrolide was independently associated with an increased 30-day mortality. A likely explanation for this observation is that patients treated with a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor alone during the 48 hours after admission had an adequate clinical response to initial therapy, while patients with a suboptimal clinical response had a macrolide added to their initial therapy. Among the 1069 patients receiving a -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor alone at 24 hours, 132 (12.3%) had a second antimicrobial agent added between 24 and 48 hours after admission. Of the 132 patients who had a second agent added to initial therapy, the 30-day mortality was 30.3%, compared with 18.5% among those continuing to receive a -lactam/ lactamase inhibitor alone. Overall, these findings are likely to be useful for the refinement of medical practice guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia. The recently released IDSA guidelines and ATS guidelines originally published in 1993 were developed with the use of consensus opinion of an expert panel without a large body of empirical evidence to support their clinical recommendations. 15,16 Both the IDSA and ATS guidelines recommend use of a secondgeneration cephalosporin alone, a non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin alone, or agents from either of these drug classes plus a macrolide as appropriate initial therapy for non severely ill patients. The IDSA guidelines also recommend use of fluoroquinolones with good S pneumoniae activity or azithromycin as appropriate initial therapy for non severely ill hospitalized pa- 2570