DOI: /zenodo

Similar documents
National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

UDC: : :579.22/ :615.28

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

ANTIBIOTICS USED FOR RESISTACE BACTERIA. 1. Vancomicin

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Antibacterial therapy 1. د. حامد الزعبي Dr Hamed Al-Zoubi

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Cipro for gram positive cocci in urine

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

General Approach to Infectious Diseases

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

ANTIBIOTICS: TECHNOLOGIES AND GLOBAL MARKETS

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Inhibiting Microbial Growth in vivo. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Zeina Alkudmani

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Canine Urinary Tract Infections

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

Background and Plan of Analysis

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Study of Bacteriological Profile of Corneal Ulcers in Patients Attending VIMS, Ballari, India

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF OSTEOMYELITIS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL AT VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Dr Hamed Al-Zoubi

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Mike Apley Kansas State University

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Cell Wall Weakeners. Antimicrobials: Drugs that Weaken the Cell Wall. Bacterial Cell Wall. Bacterial Resistance to PCNs. PCN Classification

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Gram-positive cocci Staphylococci and Streptococcia

PIPERACILLIN- TAZOBACTAM INJECTION - SUPPLY PROBLEMS

Antimicrobial Therapy

Challenges Emerging resistance Fewer new drugs MRSA and other resistant pathogens are major problems

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Antimicrobials. Antimicrobials

DETERMINING CORRECT DOSING REGIMENS OF ANTIBIOTICS BASED ON THE THEIR BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY*

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Clindamycin coverage streptococcus

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

Antibiotics in the future tense: The Application of Antibiotic Stewardship in Veterinary Medicine. Mike Apley Kansas State University

Service Delivery and Safety Department World Health Organization, Headquarters

What is pneumonia? Infection of the lung parenchyma Causative agents include bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa.

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

Bacterial Resistance of Respiratory Pathogens. John C. Rotschafer, Pharm.D. University of Minnesota

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance and Sensitivity with Reference to Ages of Elders

مادة االدوية المرحلة الثالثة م. غدير حاتم محمد

Advanced Practice Education Associates. Antibiotics

OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY. Penicillin G 5 million units IV ; followed by 2.5 million units 4hourly upto delivery

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections Prof. Mohammad Alhumayyd Dr. Aliah Alshanwani

ANTIBIOTICS IN PLASMA

Microbiology : antimicrobial drugs. Sheet 11. Ali abualhija

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Aerobic Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pus Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Hadoti Region

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Can we trust the Xpert?

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Transcription:

www.imiamn.org.ua /journal.htm 38 UDC 616-008.87:616-002:616-089.843 MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY COMPLICATIONS AFTER KNEE AND HIP JOINTS ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT AND THEIR DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION Shevtsova O.V. 1, Marushchak O.P. 1, Shapovalova O.V. 2, Kuznetsova N.V. 1 1 SI Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: ipps-noo@ukr.net 2 National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine; e-mail: biotechnology.nuph@gmail.com; Introduction Presently in the inflammatory joint diseases diagnosis and treatment microbiological examination plays a leading role. This is due to the infectious diseases frequency general increase, the hospital infections incidence rise risk, the widespread use of antimicrobial agents in medical practice and the change in the infectious foci microbiocenosises structure. Microbiological and, if necessary, serological studies of articular fluid are fundamental components of diagnosis and inflammatory joint diseases effective treatment selection [1]. Etiological agents of inflammatory processes in joints can be microorganisms of different groups. According to the literature, up to 80% of bacterial arthritis cases cause gram-positive cocci, among which S.aureus predominates. At the same time, the number of methicillin-resistant strains of this pathogen (MRSA) increases annually. Less commonly, from the affected joints β-hemolytic streptococcus group A and other groups streptococcus, gram-negative rods, microscopic fungi and anaerobic bacteria are isolated [2]. In view of the microorganisms biological nature characteristic, microbiological studies do not always make it possible to isolate the causative agent of infection. A major problem in bacteriological diagnostics is the periprosthetic and hematogenic infections low-grade causative microorganism, as well as subacute and chronic processes course presence. These include coagulase-negative staphylococcus (for example, Staphylococcus epidermidis) and anaerobic bacteria. Diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties can also be due to the pathogens ability to form antimicrobial therapy resistant microbial biofilms [3, 4, 5]. It is reported that an antibacterial drugs uncontrolled intake, the biofilms formation, errors in the collection and transportation of biological material, can cause a situation when the joint infection infectious agent can not be detected in approximately (10-20)% of the cases [6]. The inflammatory joint diseases microbiological diagnostics is a complex procedure, and a single standard for its implementation has not been developed to date. The "gold standard" of microbiological diagnostics is the causative agent isolation and identification in culture from the joint fluid and the samples of periprosthetic tissues. The effectiveness of the bacteriological diagnostic method can be improved by using various methods of biofilms formed on the prosthetic implant components destruction. In order to accelerate the diagnostic testing and to specify the results it is possible to conduct molecular diagnostic procedures [4, 6, 7]. The purpose of the studies was to identify the microbial spectrum of the synovial fluid in patients with hip and knee joints inflammatory diseases and to determine the isolated bacteria sensitivity to antibacterial drugs. Materials and methods The material for the studies were synovial fluid samples collected from 64 patients of the SE "Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology, NAMS Ukraine" clinic. The patients diagnosis were status after knee and hip joints endoprosthesis replacement with inflammatory complications. The biological material was tested in the 2015-2017 period. The synovial material collection was conducted by the attending physician by the joint puncture method. The articular fluid withdrawn into the syringe was immediately got to a microbiological laboratory. The biological samples inoculation was carried out into a fluid thioglycollate storage medium, then to obtain the aerobic and facultative-anaerobic microorganisms pure cultures the isolate passage were conducted to Columbia blood agar, salt agar and Endo medium. Further isolated microorganisms identification was performed by standard methods in accordance with current guidelines [8]. The microorganisms cultures were observed for 14 days. In the absence of microflora s growth, a preliminary negative result for all synovial material was given after 5-7 days. If there was a based on the disease anamnesis and clinic suspicion on the slowly growing pathogens presence the timing of the studies was increased. The isolates sensitivity to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disc-diffusion method [9]. In determining the microorganism s sensitivity 29 antibacterial drugs from 8 chemical groups were used: β- lactams, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, glycopeptides, oxazolidinones, glycylcyclines. Results and discussion As a result of the microorganisms identification, 68 cultures of facultative-anaerobic bacteria and microscopic fungi were isolated from the joint fluid (Figure 1). 82.3% of bacterial isolates were obtained in monoculture (n = 56) (Figure 2). Of these, 25.0% of the cultures (n = 14) were staphylococcus species with ability to coagulate the blood plasma (S. aureus (n = 9), S. intermedius (n = 5)), other staphylococcus isolation rate was 60.7% (S. epidermidis ( n = 21), S. haemolyticus (n = 9), S. simulans (n = 4)). Pathogenic streptococcus species was isolated from 5.4% of the samples (S. pyogenes (n = 3)). The Gram negative bacteria K. pneumonia cultures were isolated from 8.9% of biological material samples (n = 5).

www.imiamn.org.ua /journal.htm 39 Figure 1. Microorganisms isolated from articular fluid quantitative ratio,% Mixed microcenosises were detected in 6 samples of the biomaterial. The cultures associations consisted of two microorganisms species with the associations S. intermedius - S. pyogenes, C. lusitania and C. neoformans (n = 4) prevailing. Two other microbiocenoses were represented by Candida fungi with S. pyogenes and S. haemolyticus. Figure 2. The proportion of microorganisms isolated in monoculture, % Thus, in case of knee and hip joints inflammatory diseases, the synovial fluid microflora is mainly represented by Gram-positive bacteria, of which 77.9% are five species of staphylococcus. Coagulase-positive staphylococcus species S. aureus and S. intermedius are 24.1% of them. Mixed articular fluid microcenosises are identified in 9.4% of patients. They are mainly represented by associations of gram-positive cocci with microscopic fungi of the Candida and Cryptococcus genera. The bacterial cultures sensitivity to antimicrobial agents analysis showed that 100% of S. aureus isolates (n = 9) were sensitive to linezolid, levofloxacin and the ceftriaxone-sulbactam combination. At the same time, ceftriaxone showed an inhibitory effect only on 55.5% of isolates. On average, the combination of third generation cephalosporins with sulbactam against pathogenic staphylococcus was 2.7 times more active than the corresponding cephalosporins. 77.8% of pathogenic staphylococcus isolates were sensitive to tigecycline, and 74.6% of cultures to 7 fluoroquinolone group preparations.

www.imiamn.org.ua /journal.htm 40 The degree of an aminopenicillins activity was 25%. Amoxicillin and amoksiklav showed the same activity in relation to 44.4% of cultures. 8 out of 9 S. aureus isolates (88.9%) were resistant to benzylpenicillin, ampicillin and cefixime. S. intermedius (n = 9), the second species of coagulase-positive staphylococcus, showed the greatest sensitivity degree to meropenem and linezolid - 8 out of 9 cultures (88.9%). Aminoglycosides were less active, only 72, 2% of the isolates were susceptible to them. Fluoroquinolones and tigecycline inhibited the growth of only 66.7% S. intermedius cultures. The lowest activity had cefixime and erythromycin, to which 77.8% of isolates were resistant. The skin normoflora resident S. epidermidis (n = 21) under vegetation in the articular fluid is very difficult to be eliminated. Of all the 28 drugs tested, only linezolid and tigecycline exerted the inhibiting effect on 90.5% of the cultures. Aminoglycosides showed activity against 83.3% of isolates. The activity of cephalosporins, amoxiclav and fluoroquinolones was 26.2%, 19.5%, and 14.3%, respectively. According to our data, all isolates of epidermal staphylococcus were resistant to aminopenicillins. The antimicrobial preparations activity degrees varied for the coagulase-negative staphylococcus S. haemolyticus (n = 10) and S. simulans (n = 4). All isolates of hemolytic staphylococcus were sensitive to linezolid. Aminoglycosides exerted an effect on 80.0% of the cultures, with amikacin maximal activity, which inhibited the growth of 90% of the isolates. Fluoroquinolones had a suppressive effect on the growth of 67.1% of isolates. Cephalosporins inhibited the growth of only 30% of cultures, while 9 of 10 isolates were resistant to cefixime. We obtained only 4 S. simulans isolates. All isolates grew in monoculture and were sensitive to gentamicin. The other groups antimicrobial preparations majority activity level was about 50%. Tigecycline and vancomycin were most active against S. pyogenes (n = 6). The 83.3% of pyogenic streptococcus isolates had sensitivity to them. Linezolid was active against 66.7% of cultures, lincomycin - 50% of isolates. The β-lactam preparations (inhibitor-protected aminopenicillin - amoxiclav, cephalosporins, and carbapenems) had the minimum activity at a rate of 16.7%. None of the different groups 28 drugs tested showed 100% inhibitory activity against S. pyogenes All K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 5) were sensitive to gentamicin. Aminoglycosides showed maximal activity against 90% of isolates. 80% of isolates were sensitive to carbapenems, 65.7% to fluoroquinolones. Of all the 19 antibacterial drugs investigated, the second and third generations cephalosporins had the lowest active against 35.0% of the K. pneumoniae cultures. All gram-negative rods isolates were resistant to cefixime and ceftriaxone and cefoperazone combination with sulbactam. Thus, it was found that in the joint fluid in case of knee and hip joints inflammatory diseases, monocultures of gram-positive cocci are predominant. S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus are prevalent. These species isolates show a different degree of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, which indicates the presence of β-lactamases. Some cultures are also resistant to inhibitor-protected aminopenicillins and the third generation cephalosporins combinations with sulbactam. Such strains may present certain difficulties in the patients treatment. β-lactams also did not have high efficacy against S. pyogenes. The most active drugs for gram-negative rods species K. pneumoniae infection elimination are aminoglycosides, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. In this case all cultures were sensitive to gentamicin and showed resistance to cefixime and the third generation cephalosporins combinations with sulbactam. Of particular concern is the presence of resistance to vancomycin in 44.4% of isolates of coagulase-positive staphylococcus, including 28.6% of the S. aureus isolated strains and 28.5% of other staphylococcus species cultures and 16.7% of S. pyogenes isolates. The antimicrobial agents effectiveness against different systematic groups bacterial isolates determination results analysis allows us to conclude that the most effective drugs for gram-positive cocci are (Figure 3): linezolid, to which 88.1% of the studied isolates are sensitive, including all S. aureus and S. haemolyticus cultures, and tigecycline a preparation from the glycylcyclin group, which has activity against 78.0% of gram-positive cocci isolates. The estimated aminoglycosides efficacy is 73.7%. The fluoroquinolones, carbapenems and the third generation cephalosporins with sulbactam combinations antimicrobial activity is manifested for 50% of all isolates obtained. About 30% of cultures were sensitive to lincomycin and the third generation cephalosporins - ceftriaxone, cefixime and cefoperazone. Conclusions According to the research results obtained, the following conclusions were made. 1 Microflora isolated from synovial fluid in case of the knee and hip joints is inflammatory diseases is represented by gram-positive cocci (86.8%) in most cases, gram-negative rods amount is 7.3% and fungi of Candida and Cryptococcus genera are made 5.9%. 2 The isolated microorganisms species antimicrobials sensitivity is characterized by individual diversity with a tendency to vancomycin resistance increasing in 44.4% of coagulase-positive staphylococcus isolates, of which 28.6% are S. aureus strains; 28.5% o are other staphylococcus species cultures and 16.7% are S. pyogenes isolates. This indicates the exactly appropriate antibiotic therapy conducting necessity 3 When choosing antibiotic therapy in patients in case of coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis it is recommended to take into account the bacterial isolates antibiotic resistance formation actual trends. Consequently, the knee and hip joints inflammatory processes treatment success is largely determined by timely and effective microbiological diagnostic. Bacteriological testing of synovial fluid allows to identify the pathogen in the culture and to determine its

www.imiamn.org.ua /journal.htm 41 sensitivity to antibacterial drugs, which is necessary for the therapeutic approach correct choice. Figure 3. The gram-positive cocci sensitivity to antimicrobial agents, % of isolates References 1. Microflora characteristic in patients with large joint diseases / Z.S. Naumenko, E.A. Volokitina, N.V. Godovykh// Orthopaedic genius. 2008. 3. P. 32-34. 2. Belov B.S. Bacterial (septic) arthritis and infection of a prosthesized joint: current aspects / B.S. Belov // Modern rheumatology journal. 2010. Vol. 4. 3. P.10-17. 3. Godovyh N.V. Analysis of infectious agents in patients with joint endoprosthesis replacement/ N.V. Godovyh, L.V. Rozova // Surgical infections. 2014. Vol. 12. 2. P. 43-45. 4. Winkler T, Trampuz A, Renz N, Perka C, Bozhkova S.A. Сlassification and algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of hip periprosthetic infection // Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2016. 1. P. 33-45. 5. Current views on diagnosing and treatment of patients with periprosthetic infection after the knee arthroplasty / P.M. Preobrazhenskii, A.V. Kazemirskii, M.Iu. Goncharov // Orthopaedic genius. 2016. 3. P. 94-104. 6. Practical recommendations concerning diagnostics of implant-associated infection in the course of endoprosthetics of large joints under modern conditions / Nikolaev N.S., Borisova L.V., Pchelova N.N., Orlova A.V., Karalin A.N. // Medicinskij al'manah. 2016. 3. P. 40-45 7. Evidence-based diagnosis of implant-associated infection in orthopedic surgery / N.V. Petrovа // Hir. Pozvonoc. 2012. 1. P. 74-83. 8. Holt, J. Bergey s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. In 2 t. [Text]/ J. Holt, N. Kreig Translated from English, ed. By Acad. RAS GA Zavarzin. M.: The World, 1997. Vol. 1. 432 p., Vol. 2. 368 p. 9. Ukraine MH Order 167 from 05.04.2007 "On confirmation of guidance "Determination of the microorganisms sensitivity to antibiotics. - Kyiv, 2000 UDC 616-008.87:616-002:616-089.843 MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY COMPLICATIONS AFTER KNEE AND HIP JOINTS ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT AND THEIR DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION Shevtsova O.V., Marushchak O.P., Shapovalova O.V., Kuznetsova N.V. Introduction. Presently in the inflammatory joint diseases diagnosis and treatment microbiological examination plays a leading role. This is due to the infectious diseases frequency general increase, the hospital infections incidence rise risk, the widespread use of antimicrobial agents in medical practice and the change in the infectious foci microbiocenosises structure. Microbiological and, if necessary, serological studies of articular fluid are fundamental components of diagnosis and inflammatory joint diseases effective treatment selection. Etiological agents of inflammatory processes in joints can be microorganisms of different groups. According to the literature, up to 80% of bacterial arthritis cases cause grampositive cocci, among which S.aureus predominates. At the same time, the number of methicillin-resistant strains of this pathogen (MRSA) increases annually. Less commonly, from the affected joints β-hemolytic streptococcus group A and other groups streptococcus, gram-negative rods, microscopic fungi and anaerobic bacteria are isolated. In view of the microorganisms biological nature characteristic, microbiological studies do not always make it possible to isolate the causative agent of infection. A major problem in bacteriological diagnostics is the periprosthetic and hematogenic infections low-grade causative microorganism, as well as subacute and chronic processes course presence. These include coagulase-negative staphylococcus (for example, Staphylococcus epidermidis) and anaerobic bacteria. Diagnostic and therapeutic

www.imiamn.org.ua /journal.htm 42 difficulties can also be due to the pathogens ability to form antimicrobial therapy resistant microbial biofilms. It is reported that an antibacterial drugs uncontrolled intake, the biofilms formation, errors in the collection and transportation of biological material, can cause a situation when the joint infection infectious agent can not be detected in approximately (10-20) % of the cases. Materials and methods. The material for the studies, were synovial fluid samples collected from 64 patients of the SE "Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology, NAMS Ukraine" clinic. The patients diagnosis were status after knee and hip joints endoprosthesis replacement with inflammatory complications. The biological material was tested in the 2015-2017 period. The synovial material collection was conducted by the attending physician by the joint puncture method. The articular fluid withdrawn into the syringe was immediately got to a microbiological laboratory. The biological samples inoculation was carried out into a fluid thioglycollate storage medium, then to obtain the aerobic and facultative-anaerobic microorganisms pure cultures the isolate passage were conducted to Columbia blood agar, salt agar and Endo medium. Further isolated microorganisms identification was performed by standard methods in accordance with current guidelines. The microorganisms cultures were observed for 14 days. In the absence of microflora s growth, a preliminary negative result for all synovial material was given after 5-7 days. If there was a based on the disease anamnesis and clinic suspicion on the slowly growing pathogens presence the timing of the studies was increased.the isolates sensitivity to antimicrobial agents was determined by the discdiffusion method.in determining the microorganism s sensitivity 29 antibacterial drugs from 8 chemical groups were used: β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, glycopeptides, oxazolidinones, glycylcyclines. Results and discussion. As a result of the microorganisms identification, 68 cultures of facultative-anaerobic bacteria and microscopic fungi were isolated from the joint fluid. 82.3% of bacterial isolates were obtained in monoculture (n = 56). Of these, 25.0% of the cultures (n = 14) were staphylococcus species with ability to coagulate the blood plasma (S. aureus (n = 9), S. intermedius (n = 5)), other staphylococcus isolation rate was 60.7% (S. epidermidis ( n = 21), S. haemolyticus (n = 9), S. simulans (n = 4)). Pathogenic streptococcus species was isolated from 5.4% of the samples (S. pyogenes (n = 3)). K. pneumonia cultures were isolated from 8.9% of biological material samples (n = 5). Mixed microcenosises were detected in 6 samples of the biomaterial. The cultures associations consisted of two microorganisms species with the associations S. intermedius - S. pyogenes, C. lusitania and C. neoformans (n = 4) prevailing. Two other microbiocenoses were represented by Candida with S. pyogenes and S. haemolyticus. The bacterial cultures sensitivity to antimicrobial agents analysis showed that all S. aureus isolates were sensitive to linezolid, levofloxacin and the ceftriaxone-sulbactam combination. Generally it was determined that the most effective drugs for gram-positive cocci are linezolid, to which 88.1% of the studied isolates are sensitive, including all S. aureus and S. haemolyticus cultures, and tigecycline, which has activity against 78.0% of gram-positive cocci isolates. The estimated aminoglycosides efficacy is 73.7%. The fluoroquinolones, carbapenems and the third generation cephalosporins with sulbactam combinations antimicrobial activity is manifested for 50% of all isolates obtained. About 30% of cultures were sensitive to lincomycin and the third generation cephalosporins - ceftriaxone, cefixime and cefoperazone. Conclusions. 1. Microflora isolated from synovial fluid in case of the knee and hip joints is inflammatory diseases is represented by gram-positive cocci (86.8%) in most cases, gram-negative rods amount is 7.3% and fungi of Candida and Cryptococcus genera are made 5.9%. 2. The isolated microorganisms species antimicrobials sensitivity is characterized by individual diversity with a tendency to vancomycin resistance increasing in 44.4% of coagulasepositive staphylococcus isolates, of which 28.6% are S. aureus strains; 28.5% o are other staphylococcus species cultures and 16.7% are S. pyogenes isolates. This indicates the exactly appropriate antibiotic therapy conducting necessity. 3. When choosing antibiotic therapy in patients in case of coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis it is recommended to take into account the bacterial isolates antibiotic resistance formation actual trends. Keywords: periprosthetic infections, synovial fluid, microbiological examination