SB1576 Animal Welfare Building Lost Pet Reunion Programs that Adhere to F.S.S Presented by FAAWO

Similar documents
Best Practices for Humane Care & High Live Release Programming

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

CHAPTER 2.26 ANIMAL CONTROL

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

SUMMARY Authorizes a local government to establish a program for the managed care of

Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

the release of feral cats, authorizing their release to qualifying feral cat colonies. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN

MEMORANDUM. June 10 th, To: Members of Common Council. From: Belinda Lewis, Director Animal Care and Control

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

California Code of Regulations Health and Safety Code. Division 105. Communicable Disease Control. Chapter 1 Rabies Control

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

DOG CONTROL AND LICENSE LAW OF THE TOWN OF CAMPBELL Local Law No. 2 of the Year 2010

BILL NUMBER: SB 1785 CHAPTERED 09/23/98

Chapter 2 Animals Part 1 Dogs Running at Large Part 2 Animal Noise Control Part 3 Animals at Large

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

Here are step by step guides and model language for those who want to bring CAPA to their state

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. MISTREATMENT OF ANIMALS

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

Subject: Public safety; welfare of animals; sale of dogs and cats. Statement of purpose of bill as introduced: This bill proposes to amend 6

APPENDIX IV: CALIFORNIA ANIMAL LAWS

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Prohibiting Dogs and Animals Running at Large

CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG

ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF MISSISSIPPI

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2652

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

CURRENT TEXAS ANIMAL LAWS

Referred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 26, 2016

Library. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California

2016 STATISTICS. The LRR is calculated by dividing total live outcomes (adoptions, outgoing transfers, return to owner/guardian) by total outcomes

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 (ANIMALS) OF THE EL PASO CITY CODE

2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

Sec Mandatory spaying and neutering. a. 1. Requirement. No person may own, keep, or harbor an unaltered and unspayed dog or cat in

OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

ORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota

Town of Groveland Regulation of Dog Control, Licensing & Fees Local Law #

San Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance

TITLE VII ANIMAL AND RABIES CONTROL. Chapter 7.1. Definitions Animal. Means any animal other than dogs which may be affected by rabies.

H 7906 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======= LC02744/SUB A ======= STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D.

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT NO.

NAIA Shelter Import and Reporting Act Model Law

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Section 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.

CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES 7-1 PUBLIC HEARING. Date: June 17, Subject: Subject Property: Citywide. 1. Declare the Hearing Open: Mayor Duhovic

THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383

REFERENCE - CALIFORNIA LAW: Pet Boarding Facilities, effective January 1, 2017 (2016 SB 945, Senator William Monning)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Animal Control

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.

VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.

LEGISLATURE

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

SEC BREEDING AND TRANSFER OF DOGS AND CATS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,168, Eff. 5/18/00, Oper. 11/15/00.)

County Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

APPENDIX A MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE (rev. July 2016)

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

CHAPTER 90: ANIMALS. Section. Administration and Enforcement Animal Control Officer; authority Animal Control Officer; enforcement

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

Title 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and

AGENDA ITEM. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: July 25, 2017

Chapter 5 - ANIMALS. *Cross reference Rat control, et seq.; protection of wildlife in parks, 14-37; animals in parks,

CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS. Part 1 Prohibiting Dogs Running at Large. Part 2 Control of Animal Defecation

TOWN OF PERU LOCAL LAW NO. OF THE YEAR Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Peru as follows:

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 3021

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law

Background Paper for Proposed Ordinance

Municipal Animal Control in New Jersey, Best Practices March 2018

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

Demi s Animal Rescue Foster Agreement (Dog)

Chapter 2. Animals. Part 1 Dogs. Part 2 Keeping of Livestock and Poultry. Part 3 Animal Defecation

CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL

2008 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE September 5th, 2008 / Draft #3

Animal Control Ordinance

Ordinance Amending the Animal Control and Protection Code Relating to Potentially Dangerous and Dangerous Animals

RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL IN SANDOVAL COUNTY

Dog Control Ordinance

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE:

8 WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Hernando County is authorized,

Transcription:

SB1576 Animal Welfare Building Lost Pet Reunion Programs that Adhere to F.S.S. 823.151 Presented by FAAWO

SB 1576 Animal Welfare SB 1576 Animal Welfare by Senator Steube (R-Sarasota) and Rep. Leek (R-Daytona Beach) Cruelty Provisions: Reclassifies sentencing guidelines for aggravated animal cruelty convictions from a level 3 to a level 5, providing greater judicial discretion in sentencing felony cruelty offenders Clarifies a court s authority to issue orders of no animal contact for those convicted of any violation of 828.12, both misdemeanor and felony level violations: 828.12 (6) In addition to other penalties prescribed by law, a person who is convicted of a violation of this section may be prohibited by the court from owning, possessing, keeping, harboring, or having custody or control over any animal for a period of time determined by the court. Lost or Stray Dogs or Cats: Requires a public or private shelter, humane organization, or animal control agency that takes receivership of any lost or stray dogs or cats to adopt written policies and procedures to ensure that every reasonable effort is made to quickly and reliably return owned animals to their owners. Specifies 9 required criteria for these policies and procedures. Law goes into effect October 1, 2018.

SB 1576 Lost or Stray Dogs or Cats: Rationale Local ordinances often set minimum stray hold periods deemed appropriate to the community, but prior to this legislation, Florida had no statewide requirements for animal shelters or humane organizations with respect to owned lost or stray dogs or cats. Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, may result in an increase in owned dogs and cat becoming lost or stray. Dog and cat owners statewide should be afforded reasonable safeguards to ensure they may quickly and reliably claim lost pets. Standardizing these life-saving practices elevates animal sheltering across Florida, promotes lost pet reunification, and helps prevent accidental euthanasia of owned pets.

F.S.S. 823.151 Lost or Stray Dogs or Cats SB 1576 created F.S.S. 823.151, which requires a public or private shelter, humane organization, or animal control agency that takes receivership of any lost or stray dogs or cats to adopt written policies and procedures to ensure that every reasonable effort is made to quickly and reliably return owned animals to their owners. Such lost pet policies and procedures must include the following 9 criteria: screening for identification, such as tags and microchips, upon intake; a process for matching pets coming into the shelter with reports of lost pets made to the shelter by owners; public notice of stray dogs and cats received by the shelter, provided at the shelter or on the Internet; reasonable efforts to notify identified pet owners within 48 hours; public notice of shelter hours, location, and return-to-owner process; access for owners to claim lost pets outside of normal business hours at least 1 weekend day per week and after 5:00 p.m. 1 weekday per week (no increase in total operating hours required); direct return-to-owner protocol for returning lost dogs or cats to owners when owners have been identified by an officer in the field; Procedural safeguards to minimize the euthanasia of owned dogs and cats that shall include: record verification to ensure that each animal to be euthanized is the correct animal designated for the procedure and proper scanning for an implanted microchip using a universal scanner immediately prior to the procedure; and temporary extension of local stray hold periods when an emergency is declared, if deemed appropriate by local government.

Criteria 1: Screening for Identification Upon intake, screening of lost or stray dogs and cats for identification, including tags, licenses, implanted microchips, and tattoos.

Criteria 2: Process for Matching Found Pets with Received Lost Pet Reports A process for matching received lost or stray dogs and cats with any reports of lost pets received by the shelter from owners.

Criteria 3: Public Notice of Received Lost or Stray Dogs or Cats Public notice of lost or stray dogs and cats received, provided at the shelter or on the Internet, as appropriate, within 48 hours of the animal s admission.

Criteria 4: Owner Notification Reasonable efforts to notify identified owners of lost or stray dogs and cats within 48 hours of identification. Such reasonable efforts may include, but are not limited to, attempts to contact identified owners by telephone, by electronic mail, by United States mail, or by personal service at the owner s last known phone number and address.

Criteria 5: Public Notice of Shelter Hours, Location, Fees, and RTO Process Notice to the public of the shelter s location, hours, fees, and the return-to-owner process posted on the Internet, with the shelter s business hours posted outside the shelter facility and recorded on the shelter s telephone answering system message.

Criteria 6: Public Access Outside Standard Business Hours Access for owners to retrieve dogs and cats at least 1 weekend day per week and after 5:00 p.m. 1 weekday per week No increase in total operating hours required

Criteria 7: RTO in the Field Direct return-to-owner protocols that allow animal control officers in the field to directly return lost or stray dogs and cats to their owners when the owners have been identified.

Criteria 8: Procedural Safeguards to Minimize Euthanasia of Owned Pets Procedural safeguards to minimize the euthanasia of owned dogs and cats. Such safeguards shall include, but are not limited to, record verification to ensure that each animal to be euthanized is the correct animal designated for the procedure and proper scanning for an implanted microchip using a universal scanner immediately prior to the procedure.

Criteria 9: Temporary Extension of Hold Times after Disasters Temporary extension of local minimum stray hold periods after a disaster is declared by the President of the United States or a state of emergency is declared by the Governor, if deemed necessary by a local government in the area of the declaration.

Penalties for Non-Compliance Records related to F.S.S. 823.151 and maintained by a public or private animal shelter, humane organization, or animal control agency operated by a humane society or by a county, municipality, or other incorporated political subdivision must be made available to the public pursuant to F.S.S. chapter 119, Public Records. Note: public and private shelters are already subject to the records law for records related to 823.15 (2)(a) recordkeeping requirements. Penalties for non-compliance may apply for failure to provide the records on request to a member of the public. Shelters may also wish to post the shelter s Lost Pet policies and procedures on the shelter s website. 119.10 Violation of chapter; penalties. (1) Any public officer who: (a) Violates any provision of this chapter commits a noncriminal infraction, punishable by fine not exceeding $500. (b) Knowingly violates the provisions of s. 119.07(1) is subject to suspension and removal or impeachment and, in addition, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. (2) Any person who willfully and knowingly violates: (a) Any of the provisions of this chapter commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 [imprisonment up to 1 year] or s. 775.083 [fine not to exceed $1,000].