NESTING ECOLOGY OF GRASSLAND SONGBIRDS: EFFECTS OF PREDATION, PARASITISM, AND WEATHER

The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 126(4):686 699, 2014 NESTING ECOLOGY OF GRASSLAND SONGBIRDS: EFFECTS OF PREDATION, PARASITISM, AND WEATHER SARAH M. LUDLOW, 1,3 R. MARK BRIGHAM, 1 AND STEPHEN K. DAVIS 1,2 ABSTRACT. Understanding the breeding ecology of grassland birds is vital for understanding the mechanisms underlying their widespread population declines. We describe the breeding biology of Sprague s Pipit (Anthus spragueii), Vesper Sparrow (Pooecetes gramineus), Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis), Baird s Sparrow (Ammodramus bairdii), and Western Meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta) and quantify the effects of nest predation, brood parasitism, and weather on the nest survival of these species in southeastern Alberta. Nest predation was the primary cause of nest failure, accounting for 75% of all nest losses. Daily survival rates were higher during incubation than the nestling stage for the three sparrow species, and nest survival of Baird s Sparrows was highest at intermediate temperatures. For all five species, clutch size, hatching success, and fledging success were within the range of values previously reported for these species in other parts of their range. Brown-headed Cowbirds parasitized nests of all species except Sprague s Pipit, with 4 11% of nests containing cowbird eggs. Savannah Sparrow experienced the highest frequency of brood parasitism and was the only species to successfully fledge cowbird young. Parasitized nests of Savannah Sparrows had reduced clutch size and hatching success, and fledged fewer young compared to non-parasitized nests. The overall cost of parasitism to Savannah Sparrows was at least 1.7 young per successful nest. Received 21 October 2013. Accepted 16 June 2014. Key words: success. Alberta, clutch size, cowbird parasitism, logistic exposure, mixed-grass prairie, nest survival, reproductive Native grasslands have been reduced to,20% of their historic area and represent the most drastically altered biome in North America (Samson and Knopf 1994). Historically, much of the loss occurred because of European settlement and agricultural policies that promoted the conversion of grassland to cropland (Samson et al. 2004). The remaining native tracts continue to be threatened by cultivation, fire suppression, woody vegetation, exotic plant species, urbanization, and industrial development (Askins et al. 2007). The loss and degradation of native prairie has resulted in widespread population declines of many grassland bird species (Askins et al. 2007). For example, of the 37 grassland bird species (12 primary and 25 secondary endemic) listed by Knopf (1994), 15 are federally listed as species at risk or are under consideration for listing in Canada (Commitee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada 2013), and 6 species are federally listed or under consideration for listing as endangered or threatened in the United States (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). Our ability to understand the mechanisms underlying declines in these populations is limited by our lack of 1 Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada. 2 Canadian Wildlife Service, 300-2365 Albert Street, Regina, SK, S4P 2K1, Canada. 3 Corresponding author; e-mail: Sarah.Ludlow306@gmail.com 686 information about their breeding biology and reproductive success. While a number of nesting biology studies have been conducted on grassland songbirds (Davis and Sealy 2000, Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010, Kerns et al. 2010), more data are required from different regions and years to enable an assessment of the spatial and temporal variation in demographic rates. Descriptive data on basic breeding information is vital to the successful design and implementation of management plans and conservation policies (Lande 1988, Fletcher et al. 2006). In particular, determining which factors most influence nest survival and reproductive success is critical for modeling population dynamics (Morrison 2001). An understanding of resource use and breeding ecology, as well as the influence of predators and weather on individuals and populations is particularly important because little can be done to stabilize or enhance populations without an understanding of the mechanisms driving population declines (Vonesh and De la Cruz 2002, Robinson et al. 2004). Predation and brood parasitism by Brownheaded Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) are important factors that negatively affect the reproductive success of grassland songbirds (Davis 2003), but rates vary among species and regions (Woolfenden et al. 2004, Fontaine et al. 2007). Predation is typically the primary factor influencing nest success and survival (Martin 1993), however,

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 687 brood parasitism can reduce hatching success and nestling and fledgling survival (Hoover 2003, Rasmussen and Sealy 2006, Goguen et al. 2009). Extreme variations in temperature and precipitation may also negatively influence grassland songbird reproductive success (George et al. 1992), either indirectly through habitat alterations or directly through heat stress or water limitations. Our objectives were to 1) quantify and compare clutch size and clutch initiation dates, 2) determine the extent to which temperature and precipitation influence nest survival, and 3) quantify the extent to which nest predation and brood parasitism influence nest survival and reproductive success of five species of grassland songbirds in southeastern Alberta, Canada. METHODS Study Site. We conducted our study at the Antelope Creek Habitat Development Area (ACHDA) in southeastern Alberta (50u 339 N, 111u 539 W; elevation,760 m) from May to August in 2010 and 2011. The ACHDA and surrounding area consists largely of native, dry mixed-grass prairie and managed wetlands. Native vegetation consists primarily of needle-andthread (Hesperostipa comata) and blue grama grass (Bouteloua gracilis), and also includes prickly-pear cactus (Opuntia polyacantha), spinystar (Escobaria vivipara), sage (Artemisia spp.), lesser spikemoss (Selaginella densa), and various forbs. Grazing on the native grassland at the ACHDA begins mid-july. Approximately 200 cow-calf pairs are rotated through four paddocks (430 570 ha) with cattle typically spending 24 days in each paddock. Data Collection. In 2010, we established 12 plots distributed across all of the ACHDA. Four plots were added in 2011 to increase the area searched for nests. Plot placement was determined by the extent of native grassland cover, and we avoided placing plots in low-lying, flooded areas. Where the terrain allowed, plots were 600 3 300 m and plot size ranged from 14 21 ha (mean 6 SD: 17.7 6 1.7 ha). We marked each study plot with surveyor flags in a 50-m grid to facilitate nest searching and monitoring. We conducted nest searches from early May to late July in each year. We located nests mostly between 0600 1400 Mountain Daylight Time by systematically dragging a 25-m nylon rope, weighted with metal cans, through each study plot to flush incubating birds from nests (Davis 2003). We concentrated nest-searching efforts shortly after sunrise to increase the likelihood of flushing incubating females (Davis and Holmes 2012). Nests were also located opportunistically while conducting other activities in the area. We recorded nest locations with a hand-held global positioning system unit and placed colored surveyor s flags 5 m north and south of the nest to facilitate relocation. Nest flags were identical to grid flags to reduce the risk of predators using them as cues and were placed just above the average height of the vegetation. We checked nests every 3 4 days until chicks fledged or the nesting attempt failed. We searched each plot for nests five times over the course of the season in both years. We did not conduct nest searches during cold, wet weather and took care to avoid creating paths which ended at a nest to minimize human-induced nest failure. Similarly, we conducted nest checks as quickly as possible to minimize disruption of parental care. We candled eggs (Lokemoen and Koford 1996) to determine clutch initiation dates and to estimate hatching dates to increase the precision of our calculated survival rates (Shaffer 2004). For this same reason, we aged nestlings based on images of known-age young. We considered nest attempts successful if at least one host nestling fledged. Cues such as nestling age on last visit, adult alarm calls, fledglings observed nearby, and the presence of droppings and feather scales in the nest were used as evidence to identify successful nests. For nests with known fate, the midpoint between the last visit when the nest was observed active and the subsequent visit was used to determine exposure days. Exposure days for nests with unknown fate were included up to the last observed active visit (Manolis et al. 2000). We measured nest visibility by placing a thin 7.5-cm wooden disk divided into eight equal blackand-white sections into the nest cup and counted the number of visible sections from 1 m away in each of the four cardinal directions as well as from 1 m directly overhead (Davis and Sealy 1998, Davis 2005). We averaged the five measurements to derive a single visibility value for each nest with a value of eight being most visible and 0 being least visible. We scored nest visibility along a gradient, which ranged from completely concealed to completely exposed, rather than categorizing a nest as concealed or not based on whether the disk was observable. We obtained temperature and precipitation data from Environment Canada s

688 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 weather station in Brooks, Alberta (50u 339 N, 111u 509 W), which is,20 km east of the ACHDA. For the temperature and precipitation variables, we used the mean of nest visit intervals. Statistical Analyses. We performed all analyses in SAS Enterprise Guide 4.3 (SAS Institute, Inc. 2010). We combined data from both years for species with,50 nests. We calculated clutch initiation dates based on the age of eggs and young, as well as known hatching dates. We calculated mean clutch size of all nests initiated within a given week (starting 1 May to 23 Jul) by different females of the same species and then regressed this using a general linear model (PROC GLM) weighted by the square root of the number of nests to determine the extent to which mean weekly clutch size varied over the breeding season. Nests were excluded from clutch size analyses if they 1) contained cowbird eggs or young on the first visit, 2) were deserted during the laying stage, or 3) they had fewer than three eggs and were found during the middle of the breeding season or during the nestling or late incubation stage. These criteria were used to omit nests where it was unclear whether the number of eggs or chicks in the nest represented a complete clutch. Nests with fewer than three eggs that were found early or late in the breeding season were included, since females may produce smaller clutches during these portions of the breeding season (Wray et al. 1982). We used the logistic exposure method (Shaffer 2004) to determine the extent to which daily survival rate varied as a function of temporal (nest age, date, and year) and environmental factors (temperature and precipitation). We examined models including an interactive effect of year and age for species with $50 nests to ensure there were no effects dependent on the year of the study. We combined years if we found no support for an interactive effect of year on daily nest survival rate or if the direction of the response was the same in both years. Otherwise we analyzed years separately. Our temporal models (n 5 12) included linear effects of age and date, quadratic effect of age, cubic effect of age, a null (constant survival), interactive effects of age and date, and a global model. Environmental models (n 5 6) included linear effects of precipitation and temperature, as wells as a quadratic effect of temperature, a null, and a global model. We combined the top temporal model with environmental models to determine the relative importance of environmental factors on nest survival. We used Akaike s Information Criteria adjusted for small sample sizes (AIC c ) to rank models (Burnham and Anderson 2000). We considered the model with the lowest AICc value to be the best fit model of those considered. For model selection purposes, we calculated 85% confidence limits to identify uninformative model parameters (Arnold 2010). Because of model selection uncertainty among temporal models, we performed model averaging on all models that were better than null and had weights greater than zero. We compared hatching success (number of eggs hatched per nest), fledging success (mean number of young fledged per nest and per successful nest), clutch size (number of eggs laid in a nest), and predation rates of parasitized and non-parasitized Savannah Sparrows nests using the Student s t- test (PROC TTEST). Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis) was the only species included in this comparison, because nests of other species parasitized by cowbirds were low in number. Nest visibility values and hatching and fledging rates from non-parasitized, parasitized, and multiply parasitized nests are presented as mean 6 standard deviation. RESULTS We located 533 nests of 23 species during the 2 years of study. We focus on the five songbird species that comprised,98% of the total number of songbird nests (n 5 332) and for which at least 20 nests were found (Hensler and Nichols 1981): Sprague s Pipits (Anthus spragueii; n 5 21), Vesper Sparrows (Pooecetes gramineus; n 5 53), Savannah Sparrows (n 5 190), Baird s Sparrows (Ammodramus bairdii; n 5 35), and Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta; n 5 26). Clutch Initiation and Clutch Size. Earliest clutch initiation dates ranged from 8 19 May and peaked during 28 May to 7 June for all five species in both years (Fig. 1). Nest initiation continued until the end of July for all five species. On average, Western Meadowlarks initiated nests earliest and Baird s Sparrows initiated nests latest (Fig. 1). Vesper Sparrows tended to lay the smallest clutches, whereas Western Meadowlark laid the largest (Table 1). Vesper and Baird s sparrows experienced a decrease in clutch size over the breeding season; however, these relationships were highly variable (20.094 6 0.05; 20.081 6 0.07, respectively). Clutch sizes of Savannah Sparrows, Sprague s Pipits, and Western

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 689 FIG. 1. Distribution of nests initiated over the breeding season for Savannah Sparrows, Vesper Sparrows, Baird s Sparrows, Western Meadowlarks, and Sprague s Pipits in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. The breeding season is divided into weeks based on the following intervals: week 1 5 May 1 7, week 2 5 May 8 14, week 3 5 May 15 21, week 4 5 May 22 28, week 5 5 May 29 June 4, week 6 5 June 5 11, week 7 5 June 12 18, week 8 5 June 19 25, week 9 5 June 26 July 2, week 10 5 July 3 9, week 11 5 July 10 16, and week 12 5 July 17 23. Vertical dashed lines indicate the week in which 1 June and 1 July occur.

690 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 TABLE 1. Clutch sizes of five grassland songbird species nesting in south-eastern Alberta, 2010 2011. Clutch size (%) Species 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean 6 SD Sprague s Pipit (n 5 21) Vesper Sparrow (n 5 50) Savannah Sparrow (n 5 166) Baird s Sparrow (n 5 33) Western Meadowlark (n 5 25) 0 0 38 52 10 0 4.7 6 0.6 2 22 66 10 0 0 3.8 6 0.7 0 8 30 37 5 0 4.5 6 0.9 0 12 36 49 3 0 4.4 6 0.8 0 4 12 28 52 4 5.4 6 0.9 Meadowlarks remained relatively constant over the breeding season (20.038 6 0.05, 0.005 6 0.09, and 20.047 6 0.10, respectively). Reproductive Success. Of the nests we monitored, 29 52% of the nests successfully fledged host young (Table 2). The proportion of eggs laid that hatched ranged between 60 68% for all five species, and of the eggs incubated full term, 79 95% hatched (Table 2). Mean number of host young fledged per nest ranged from 0.8 for Vesper Sparrows to 1.9 for Sprague s Pipits, and the mean number of host young fledged per successful nest ranged from 2.9 for Vesper Sparrows to 4.6 for Western Meadowlarks (Table 2). Predation accounted for 75% of unsuccessful nests of all species, and Sprague s Pipits had the lowest apparent predation rates (Table 2). Temporal factors best explained variation in nest survival for all species except Western Meadowlarks and Sprague s Pipits. A cubic effect of age was the top model explaining nest survival of Savannah and Vesper sparrows, and a quadratic effect of age was the top model explaining Baird s Sparrows nest survival (Table 3, Appendix 1). Although model selection uncertainty was high, age was clearly the most influential variable as it was included in all top models (Table 3). Daily survival rates were highest during incubation, decreased at hatching, then increased through the nestling period for the three sparrow species (Fig. 2). We found no support for an effect of age or date on the nest survival of Sprague s Pipits and Western Meadowlarks. Nest survival did not differ between years for any of the five focal species, and there was no effect of date on nest survival as confidence limits overlapped zero in all cases. Although temperature was included in the top model for Vesper Sparrows and precipitation was the top model for Sprague s Pipits (Table 4), confidence limits overlapped zero in both cases TABLE 2. Apparent nest success, hatching success, and productivity of five grassland songbirds in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Samples represent nests with known outcomes for each species. Failed nests represent nests that were unsuccessful because of reasons other than predation and desertion. Number of nests of each species is indicated after species name; the total number of eggs that hatched, and the number of eggs incubated full term are also provided. Species Sprague s Pipit (n 5 21) Vesper Sparrow (n 5 52) Savannah Sparrow (n 5 189) Baird s Sparrow (n 5 35) Western Meadowlark (n 5 26) % nests successful a 52 29 39 31 35 % nests depredated 29 54 47 51 46 % nests deserted 19 15 10 11 19 % nests failed 0 2 4 6 0 % eggs hatched (n) 61 (60) 68 (136) 68 (550) 68 (103) 60 (83) % eggs incubated full term that hatched (n) 92 (65) 90 (151) 79 (641) 90 (115) 95 (87) Host young fledged/nest 1.9 6 2.0 0.8 6 1.4 1.3 6 1.9 1.1 6 1.8 1.9 6 2.4 Host young fledged/ successful nest 3.6 6 1.1 2.9 6 1.0 3.4 6 1.5 3.6 6 0.8 4.6 6 0.7 a Fledged at least one host young.

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 691 TABLE 3. Model selection results for logistic exposure models of daily survival rate (DSR) on nest age and date for Savannah, Vesper, and Baird s sparrows in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Western Meadowlark and Sprague s Pipit are excluded because the null model was the top model. Log (L) is the value of the maximized log-likelihood function, K is the number of parameters in the model, AIC c is Akaike s Information Criteria adjusted for small sample size, DAIC c is the scaled value of AIC c, and w i is the Akaike weight. AGE represents the age of the nest, with zero being the day the first egg is laid. DATE represents the date at which the nest was active. NULL is constant survival regardless of age or date. Higher order terms include all lower order terms (e.g., AGE 3 includes AGE 2 and AGE). Only models that are within 3 DAIC of the best model are presented. Model Log (L) K DAIC c w i Vesper Sparrow AGE 3 264.7 4 0.0 0.31 AGE 3 + DATE 264.1 5 0.9 0.20 AGE 2 266.7 3 2.1 0.11 AGE 3 + DATE 2 263.9 6 2.7 0.08 AGE 2 + DATE 266.0 4 2.7 0.08 AGE + DATE 267.1 3 2.8 0.08 NULL 277.8 1 23.4 0.00 Savannah Sparrow AGE 3 2247.0 4 0.0 0.57 AGE 3 + DATE 2246.7 5 1.4 0.29 AGE 3 + DATE 2 2246.4 6 2.8 0.14 NULL 2263.3 1 26.4 0.00 Baird s Sparrow AGE 2 244.3 3 0.0 0.25 AGE 3 243.6 4 0.5 0.19 AGE 2 + DATE 244.0 4 1.3 0.13 AGE 246.3 2 1.9 0.10 AGE 3 + DATE 243.3 5 2.1 0.09 AGE + DATE 245.4 3 2.1 0.09 NULL 248.7 1 4.7 0.02 (Appendix 2). The quadratic effect of temperature was included in the top model for Baird s Sparrows nest survival (Table 4, Appendix 2). We found no support for weather effects on nest survival for Savannah Sparrows or Western Meadowlarks (Table 4). Nest visibility was lowest for Western Meadowlarks (0.5 6 0.6 disc sections) and Sprague s Pipits (1.0 6 0.6 disc sections) and highest for Vesper Sparrows (2.5 6 1.8 disc sections); Savannah (1.7 6 1.4 disc sections) and Baird s (1.3 6 1.4 disc sections) sparrows had intermediate mean nest visibility values. Savannah Sparrows nest survival decreased with increased nest visibility (b 6 SE 5 20.13 6 0.07), but the relationship between nest visibility and nest survival was highly variable for Vesper Sparrows (b 6 SE 5 0.09 6 0.11), Baird s Sparrows (b 6 SE 5 0.34 6 0.25), Western Meadowlarks (b 6 SE 5 0.22 6 0.39), and Sprague s Pipits (b 6 SE 5 20.59 6 0.66). Cowbird Parasitism. Of the five species, Savannah Sparrow was the primary host for Brown-headed Cowbirds with,11% of nests parasitized (Table 5). Savannah Sparrow was the only species to fledge cowbird young with 21% of cowbird eggs surviving to fledging (Table 5). Forty percent of parasitized Savannah Sparrows nests and all parasitized Vesper Sparrows nests contained more than one cowbird egg (Table 5). Parasitized Savannah Sparrows nests had reduced reproductive rates compared to non-parasitized nests. Fewer eggs hatched from parasitized nests (1.6 6 1.3) compared to non-parasitized nests (3.1 6 1.9). Of those eggs incubated full term, 2.3 6 1.6 eggs hatched from parasitized nests compared to 3.5 6 2.0 eggs in non-parasitized nests. Fewer young fledged from parasitized nests (0.7 6 1.0) than non-parasitized nests (1.4 6 2.0). Out of successful nests, 1.9 6 0.9 young fledged from parasitized nests compared to 3.6 6 1.4 from nonparasitized nests. Clutch size was reduced in parasitized nests (3.0 6 1.3) compared to nonparasitized nests (4.5 6 0.8). Hatching and fledging success were similar for nests with one cowbird egg or young (1.4 6 1.4 eggs and 0.6 6 1.0 young, respectively) and those with multiple cowbird eggs or young (1.6 6 1.3 eggs 0.7 6 1.1 young, respectively). The number of host young fledged from successful unparasitized Savannah Sparrows nests (3.6 6 0.2) was approximately twice that of successful parasitized nests (1.9 6 0.3). We found little evidence that predation rates differed between parasitized and non-parasitized Savannah Sparrows nests (P 5 0.51) or for all passerine species combined (P 5 0.73). DISCUSSION Clutch Initiation and Clutch Size. The simultaneous arrival of a large number of birds, followed by territory establishment and commencement of egg-laying, likely resulted in the early peak in clutch initiation observed at ACHDA. Arrival date has a strong influence on laying date, with earlier arriving birds initiating clutches sooner (Cristol 1995, Davis 2003). In general, mean clutch initiation dates corresponded with typical arrival times for the five focal species

692 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 FIG. 2. Daily nest survival rate of Savannah Sparrows, Vesper Sparrows, and Baird s Sparrows in relation to nest age (days) in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Dashed lines indicate unconditional 95% confidence intervals for the logistic exposure model. Day 1 is the first day of incubation.

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 693 TABLE 4. Model selection results for the logistic exposure models of daily survival rate (DSR) as a function of weather for five species of grassland songbirds in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Models represent top temporal and weather models for each species as well as a global model combining the two and a null model. For species with no apparent age effects, the top three weather models are presented. TEMP and PPT represent the linear effect of temperature and precipitation, respectively. Higher order terms include all lower order terms (e.g., AGE 3 includes AGE 2 and AGE). Only species that had environmental or temporal models better than null are included. Model Log (L) K DAICc w i Sprague s Pipit PPT 220.6 2 0.0 0.32 NULL 221.7 1 0.2 0.28 PPT + TEMP 220.1 3 1.1 0.19 TEMP 221.7 2 2.2 0.10 Vesper Sparrow AGE 3 + TEMP 263.6 5 0.0 0.38 AGE 3 264.8 4 0.4 0.31 AGE 3 +PPT 264.4 7 1.5 0.18 NULL 277.8 1 20.3 0.00 Savannah Sparrow AGE 3 2247.0 4 0.0 0.74 AGE 3 + TEMP 2 + PPT 2245.1 7 2.1 0.26 TEMP 2 + PPT 2259.9 4 25.6 0.00 NULL 2263.4 1 26.8 0.00 Baird s Sparrow AGE 2 + TEMP 2 240.7 5 0.0 0.76 AGE 2 244.3 3 3.2 0.16 TEMP 2 245.2 3 4.8 0.07 NULL 248.7 1 7.9 0.01 and clutch initiation dates reported in other studies (Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010). The synchronicity in egg-laying resulting in a slight increase in the number of nests initiated later in the breeding season may be the result of simultaneous nest failure because of adverse weather and subsequent re-nesting. Indeed, we observed widespread nest failure following extreme weather events at ACHDA (SML, pers. obs.). Clutch sizes fell within the range of previously reported values for all species in our study (Wray et al. 1982, George et al. 1992, Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010) and tended to decrease as the breeding season progressed for Vesper and Baird s sparrows. A decrease in clutch size over the breeding season has been reported in many avian taxa (Perrins and McCleery 1989, Rowe et al. 1994), including grassland songbirds (Winter 1999, Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010). The larger clutch sizes observed earlier in the breeding season at ACHDA may be because of decreased physical condition later in the season resulting from renesting and double brooding (Slagsvold 1982, Wray et al. 1982), or a larger diversity of prey taxa available to feed nestlings earlier in the season (Maher 1974). Reproductive Success. Predation was the primary cause of nest failure for all species; 75% of failed nests were lost to predators, 19% to desertion, and 5% to other causes such as inclement weather and cattle trampling. The frequency of nest predation at ACHDA is comparable to previously reported rates for grassland songbirds (Wray et al. 1982, Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010). Hatching success was at least 5% higher at ACHDA than south-central Saskatchewan (Davis 2003) for Savannah Sparrows, Baird s Sparrows, Western Meadowlarks, and Sprague s Pipits but 10 24% lower than Montana (Jones et al. 2010). The mean number of young fledged per nest and per successful nest of Savannah Sparrows, Baird s Sparrows, and Sprague s Pipits was similar at ACHDA to previously reported values for these species in other parts of their range (Davis and Sealy 1998, Davis 2003, TABLE 5. Frequency and intensity of cowbird parasitism and cowbird reproductive success in nests of five grassland songbird host species in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Species (n) % nests parasitized % multiple parasitism Mean (6SE) cowbird eggs laid % cowbirds fledged (cowbird eggs) Mean (6SE) cowbirds fledged / parasitized nest Mean (6SE) cowbirds fledged/ successful parasitized nest a Sprague s Pipit (n 5 21) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vesper Sparrow (n 5 53) 2 100 2 0 (2) 0 0 Savannah Sparrow (n 5 190) 11 5 1.7 6 0.2 21 (33) 0.4 6 0.1 0.9 6 0.2 Baird s Sparrow (n 5 35) 6 0 1.0 6 0.2 0 (2) 0 0 Western Meadowlark (n 5 26) 4 0 1 0 (1) 0 0 a Fledged at least one host or cowbird young.

694 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 Jones et al. 2010). Mean number of young fledged per nest was similar to previously reported values for Western Meadowlarks (Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010); however, successful nests of Western Meadowlarks at ACHDA fledged,0.7 more young than successful nests in Saskatchewan (Davis 2003) and Montana (Jones et al 2010). For Vesper Sparrows, the mean number of young fledged per nest and per successful nest at ACHDA was similar to values reported for this species on reclaimed surface mines in West Virginia (Wray et al. 1982) and native pastures in North Dakota (George et al. 1992). Hatching success of Vesper Sparrows at ACHDA was also similar to values reported in North Dakota (George et al. 1992). Based on the similar rates of hatching and fledging success in different locations and habitats, Vesper Sparrows appear to not only occupy a variety of disturbed grassland habitats but reproduce successfully there as well. Nest survival peaked during mid-incubation, declined after hatching, then increased again late in the nestling stage for Savannah and Vesper sparrows and is consistent with data from elsewhere (Davis 2005, Grant et al. 2005, Kerns et al. 2010, Grant and Shaffer 2012). Baird s Sparrows nest survival was greatest at the start of incubation then declined in the early nestling period before increasing just prior to fledging. Declining nest survival during incubation and early in the nestling period may be because of longer risk exposure (Grant et al. 2005). The longer a nest persists, the greater the likelihood of detection of the nest by predators. Declining survival early in the nestling period may also be because of increased parental activity. Parental activity is greater during the nestling stage than incubation (Roper and Goldstein 1997), potentially increasing the risk of nest predation during this stage (Martin et al. 2000, Muchai and du Plessis 2005). Higher predation rates during the nestling stage than during incubation have been found in songbirds nesting in forest (Cox et al. 2012), shrub (Thompson et al. 1999, Burhans et al. 2002), and grassland habitats (Pietz and Granfors 2000, Davis et al. 2012). In addition to increased parental activity, factors such as movement, noise, and olfactory cues from nestlings could attract predators to a nest (Petit et al. 1989, Briskie et al. 1999). Nests containing nestlings are more profitable for predators than nests containing eggs because of the larger mass of chicks, particularly older nestlings. However, the relevance of these factors to the rate of nest predation in a particular area is determined by composition of the local predator community (Roper and Goldstein 1997) and how the dominant predators locate nests (Herzog and Burghardt 1974, Eichholz and Koenig 1992). Increasing nest survival from early to late in the nestling stage may result from a number of factors (Grant et al. 2005), such as reduced involuntary movements by nestlings and increased control over begging with increasing nestling age (Dawson and Evans 1957, Dawson and Evans 1960), increased thermoregulatory and self-defense capabilities of the young with age (Dawson and Evans 1957, Halupka 1998), and increased parental defense (Montgomerie and Weatherhead 1988, Tryjanowski and Goławski 2004). We did not find any effects of nest age on nest survival of Sprague s Pipits or Western Meadowlarks. Davis (2005) found that Sprague s Pipits nest survival decreased with nest age and that Western Meadowlarks nest survival was lowest shortly after hatching. A linear effect of age was the secondranked model for nest survival of both Sprague s Pipits and Western Meadowlarks in this study, but the relatively small number of nests may have precluded us from detecting strong age-effects. Baird s Sparrow was the only species whose nest survival was influenced by weather. Baird s Sparrows nest survival was high at low (,4 uc) temperatures, decreased as temperatures increased to intermediate levels (,15 uc), then increased as temperatures increased (up to,25 uc). Increased nest survival at high and low temperatures and reduced nest survival at intermediate temperatures may be because the incubating bird is more likely to be on the nest during temperature extremes but leaves the nest more frequently or for longer periods during intermediate temperatures (Davis and Holmes 2012, Kirkham and Davis 2013) thereby increasing predation risk during these times (Duncan Rastogi et al. 2006). Nest concealment only influenced nest survival of Savannah Sparrows with survival increasing with more concealed nests. Nest concealment can have an important influence on nest predation (Martin 1993), but the latter is not always correlated with concealment because of variation in the predator community (Dion et al. 2000) or compensatory behaviors by parents (Remeš 2005). The variable relationship between nest survival and concealment among Vesper Sparrows, Baird s Sparrows, Western Meadowlarks,

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 695 and Sprague s Pipits may be because of small sample sizes or may reflect the diversity of the local predator community and the various ways different types of predators locate nests. Cowbird Parasitism. All species were parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds except Sprague s Pipit, and the rates of cowbird parasitism we observed in this study are similar to that in other regions of the northern mixed-grass prairie (Maher 1973, Jones et al. 2010, Gaudet 2013). Savannah Sparrows nests were parasitized at least twice as frequently as the other host species. The lack of cowbird parasitism we found on Sprague s Pipits nests corresponds with low levels of parasitism found by others (Davis and Sealy 2000, Davis 2003, Jones et al. 2010). The greater frequency of parasitism in Savannah Sparrows nests may be because of the abundance of this species relative to the others; Savannah Sparrows territory density at ACHDA was,10 3 that of the other four species (Ludlow 2013). Davis and Sealy (2000) found that the most abundant host species were also the most frequently parasitized on two of three study sites in southwestern Manitoba. Previous studies have shown that brood parasitism rates can be influenced by the regional abundance of hosts and cowbirds (Hoover and Brittingham 1993, Barber and Martin 1997). Savannah Sparrows may be selected by cowbirds, because they are better quality hosts than the other study species. Savannah Sparrows eggs are similar in appearance to cowbird eggs (Klippenstine and Sealy 2010). Female Savannah Sparrows accept cowbird eggs (Klippenstine and Sealy 2008), and the species was the only one to successfully rear cowbird young in our study. Similarly, Savannah Sparrows in southwest Manitoba fledged proportionally more cowbird young than any of the other seven species examined (Davis and Sealy 2000). The frequency of cowbird parasitism in Savannah Sparrows nests we found is similar to the frequency reported in Montana (Jones et al. 2010) but lower than Saskatchewan (Davis 2003), Manitoba (Davis and Sealy 2000), and North Dakota (Kerns et al. 2010). The frequency of cowbird young fledged from Savannah Sparrows nests was lower than in Manitoba (Davis and Sealy 2000) but almost twice as high as in Saskatchewan (Davis 2003). Brood parasitism is costly to hosts because of reduced reproductive success (Hoover 2003). Parasitized Savannah Sparrows nests experienced reduced clutch size and lowered hatching and fledging success compared to non-parasitized nests. Reduced clutch size likely resulted from female cowbirds removing at least one host egg before laying one of their own (Sealy 1992). The presence of cowbird eggs or nestlings may reduce the hatching success of host eggs through egg capping (Hauber 2003a), reduced incubation efficiency, and disruption of host incubation patterns (Hauber 2003b). Cowbird parasitism can reduce fledging rates of the host clutch if the cowbird nestling out-competes its host nestmates for food (Dearborn 1998). Cowbird parasitism cost Savannah Sparrows 1.7 young per successful nest. Similar estimates of the cost of cowbird parasitism have been reported for Savannah Sparrows in Manitoba (Davis 1994, Davis and Sealy 2000). Predation rates were similar for parasitized and non-parasitized nests, indicating that the presence of cowbird young did not substantially increase predation risk (Dearborn 1999), and any decrease in host productivity resulted from cowbird parasitism. Although pitfalls exist when comparing nest success between parasitized and non-parasitized nests (Zanette et al. 2007), such comparisons provide valuable information about the costs to hosts associated with cowbird parasitism during the nesting stage and represent the minimum of the potential costs to host reproduction associated with cowbird parasitism (Rasmussen and Sealy 2006). Nest predation was the most important factor influencing the reproductive success of grassland songbirds in southeast Alberta. High rates of nest predation are common in other studies of grassland songbirds at other locations (Davis 2005, Jones et al. 2010). Brood parasitism was also an important factor influencing reproductive success of Savannah Sparrows; however, parasitism rates varied with those found in other locations, suggesting that the impact of brood parasitism on host reproductive success varies geographically within a species range. Furthermore, to fully understand the effects of predation and brood parasitism on reproductive success additional demographic parameters need to be addressed, such as adult and fledgling survival and the tendency of a species to re-nest and raise multiple broods. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank H. J. Kalyn Bogard, C. A. Gaudet, D. J. Sawatzky, M. Tokaruk, R. Clark, L. Kovatch, J. M. A.

696 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 Dickson, N. Harper, K. Howell, B. Campbell, C. B. S. Kirkham, D. Wilkinson, and J. A. Poissant for their invaluable assistance in the field. Thank you to J. Nicholson, N. Wilson, and S. Burnard for logistical support and hospitality. We appreciate the comments provided by two anonymous reviewers which improved the manuscript. Financial support was provided by Environment Canada- Canadian Wildlife Service, Alberta Conservation Association, Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada, MITACS Accelerate, Antelope Creek Habitat Development Area, Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment Fish and Wildlife Development Fund, and the University of Regina. LITERATURE CITED ARNOLD, T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike s Information Criteria. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1175 1178. ASKINS, R. A., F. CHAVEZ-RAMÍREZ, B. C. DALE, C. A. HAAS, J. R. HERKERT, F. L. KNOPF, AND P. D. VICKERY. 2007. Conservation of grassland birds in North America: understanding ecological processes in different regions: report of the AOU Committee on Conservation. Ornithological Monographs 64:1 46. BARBER, D. R. AND T. E. MARTIN. 1997. Influence of alternate host densities on Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism rates in Black-capped Vireos. Condor 99: 595 604. BRISKIE, J. V., P. R. MARTIN, AND T. E. MARTIN. 1999. Nest predation and the evolution of nestling begging calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266:2153 2159. BURHANS, D. E., D. DEARBORN, F.R.THOMPSON, III AND J. FAABORG. 2002. Factors affecting predation at songbird nests in old fields. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:240 249. BURNHAM, K. P. AND D. R. ANDERSON. 2000. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA. COMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF ENDANGERED WILDLIFE IN CANADA. 2013. List of wildlife species at risk. Species at Risk Act public registry. Schedule 1 subsections 2(1), 42(2) and 68(2). www.sararegistry.gc.ca (accessed 15 Oct 2013). COX, W. A., F. R. THOMPSON, III, AND J. FAABORG. 2012. Species and temporal factors affect predator-specific rates of nest predation for forest songbirds in the Midwest. Auk 129:147 155. CRISTOL, D. A. 1995. Early arrival, initiation of nesting, and social status: an experimental study of breeding female Red-winged Blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology 6:87 93. DAVIS, S. K. 1994. Cowbird parasitism, predation, and host selection in fragmented grasslands of southwestern Manitoba. Thesis. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. DAVIS, S. K. 2003. Nesting ecology of mixed-grass prairie songbirds in southern Saskatchewan. Wilson Bulletin 115:119 130. DAVIS, S. K. 2005. Nest-site selection patterns and the influence of vegetation on nest survival of mixed-grass prairie passerines. Condor 107:605 616. DAVIS, S. K. AND T. G. HOLMES. 2012. Sprague s Pipit incubation behaviour. Studies in Avian Biology 43:67 76. DAVIS, S. K., S. L. JONES, K. M. DOHMS, AND T. G. HOLMES. 2012. Identification of Sprague s Pipit nest predators. Studies in Avian Biology 43:173 182. DAVIS,S.K.AND S. G. SEALY. 1998. Nesting biology of the Baird s Sparrow in southwestern Manitoba. Wilson Bulletin 110:262 270. DAVIS, S. K. AND S. G. SEALY. 2000. Cowbird parasitism and nest predation in fragmented grasslands of southwestern Manitoba. Pages 220 228 in Ecology and management of cowbirds and their hosts: studies in the conservation of North American passerine birds (J. N. M. Smith, T. L. Cook, S. I. Rothstein, S. K. Robinson, and S. G. Sealy, Editors). University of Texas Press, Austin, USA. DAWSON,W.R.AND F. C. EVANS. 1957. Relation of growth and development to temperature regulation in nestling Field and Chipping sparrows. Physiological Zoology 30:315 327. DAWSON,W.R.AND F. C. EVANS. 1960. Relation of growth and development to temperature regulation in nestling Vesper Sparrows. Condor 62:329 340. DEARBORN, D. C. 1998. Begging behavior and food acquisition by Brown-Headed Cowbird nestlings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:259 270. DEARBORN, D. C. 1999. Brown-Headed Cowbird nestling vocalizations and risk of nest predation. Auk 116:448 457. DION, N., K. A. HOBSON, AND S. LARIVIÈRE. 2000. Interactive effects of vegetation and predators on the success of natural and simulated nests of grassland songbirds. Condor 102:629 634. DUNCAN RASTOGI, A., L. ZANETTE, AND M. CLINCHY. 2006. Food availability affects diurnal nest predation and adult antipredator behaviour in song sparrows, Melospiza melodia. Animal Behaviour 72:933 940. EICHHOLZ, M. W. AND W. D. KOENIG. 1992. Gopher snake attraction to birds nests. Southwestern Naturalist 37:293 298. FLETCHER JR., R. J., R. R. KOFORD, AND D. A. SEAMAN. 2006. Critical demographic parameters for declining songbirds breeding in restored grasslands. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:145 157. FONTAINE, J. J., M. MARTEL, H. M. MARKLAND, A. M. NIKLISON, K. L. DECKER, AND T. E. MARTIN. 2007. Testing ecological and behavioral correlates of nest predation. Oikos 116:1887 1894. GAUDET, G. A. 2013. The effects of natural gas development on density, reproductive success and nest survival of grassland songbirds in south-western Saskatchewan. Thesis. University of Regina, Regina, Canada. GEORGE, T. L., A. C. FOWLER, R.L.KNIGHT, AND L. C. MCEWEN. 1992. Impacts of severe drought on grassland birds in western North Dakota. Ecological Applications 2:275 284. GOGUEN, C. B., D. R. CURSON, AND N. E. MATHEWS. 2009. Effects of parasitism by Brown-Headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) on reproductive success of three

Ludlow et al. N GRASSLAND SONGBIRD NESTING ECOLOGY 697 frequent hosts in New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 54:58 67. GRANT, T. A. AND T. L. SHAFFER. 2012. Time-specific patterns of nest survival for ducks and passerines breeding in North Dakota. Auk 129:319 328. GRANT, T. A., T. L. SHAFFER, E.M.MADDEN, AND P. J. PIETZ. 2005. Time-specific variation in passerine nest survival: new insights into old questions. Auk 122: 661 672. HALUPKA, K. 1998. Partial nest predation in an altricial bird selects for the accelerated development of young. Journal of Avian Biology 29:129 133. HAUBER, M. E. 2003a. Egg-capping is a cost paid by hosts of interspecific brood parasites. Auk 120:860 865. HAUBER, M. E. 2003b. Hatching asynchrony, nestling competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism. Behavioral Ecology 14:227 235. HENSLER, G. L. AND J. D. NICHOLS. 1981. The Mayfield method of estimating nesting success: a model, estimators and simulation results. Wilson Bulletin 93:42 53. HERZOG JR., H. A. AND G. M. BURGHARDT. 1974. Prey movement and predatory behavior of juvenile western yellow-bellied racers, Coluber constrictor mormon. Herpetologica 30:285 289. HOOVER, J. P. 2003. Multiple effects of brood parasitism reduce the reproductive success of Prothonotary Warblers, Protonotaria citrea. Animal Behaviour 65:923 934. HOOVER, J. P. AND M. C. BRITTINGHAM 1993. Regional variation in cowbird parasitism of Wood Thrushes. Wilson Bulletin 105:228 238. JONES, S. L., J. S. DIENI, AND P. J. GOUSE. 2010. Reproductive biology of a grassland songbird community in north-central Montana. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122:455 464. KERNS, C. K., M. R. RYAN, R. K. MURPHY, F. R. THOMPSON, III, AND C. S. RUBIN. 2010. Factors affecting songbird nest survival in northern mixedgrass prairie. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:257 264. KIRKHAM, C. B. S. AND S. K. DAVIS. 2013. Incubation and nesting behaviour of the Chestnut-collared Longspur. Journal of Ornithology 154:795 801. KLIPPENSTINE, D. R. AND S. G. SEALY. 2008. Differential ejection of cowbird eggs and non-mimetic eggs by grassland passerines. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:667 673. KLIPPENSTINE, D. R. AND S. G. SEALY. 2010. Assessing generalized egg mimicry: a quantitative comparison of eggs of Brown-headed Cowbirds and grassland passerines. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122:346 353. KNOPF, F. L. 1994. Avian assemblages on altered grasslands. Studies in Avian Biology 15:247 257. LANDE, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455 1460. LOKEMOEN, J. T. AND R. R. KOFORD. 1996. Using candlers to determine the incubation stage of passerine eggs. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:660 668. LUDLOW, S. M. 2013. Breeding biology of grassland songbirds and the effects of oil and natural gas development on their density and reproductive success. Thesis. University of Regina, Regina, Canada. MAHER, W. J. 1973. Birds: I. Population dynamics. Technical Report No. 34. Matador Project. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Programme. MAHER, W. J. 1974. Birds: III. Food habits. Technical Report No. 52. Matador Project. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Programme. MANOLIS, J. C., D. E. ANDERSEN, AND F. J. CUTHBERT. 2000. Uncertain nest fates in songbird studies and variation in Mayfield estimation. Auk 117:615 626. MARTIN, T. E. 1993. Nest predation and nest sites. BioScience 43:523 532. MARTIN, T. E., J. SCOTT, AND C. MENGE. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 267:2287 2293. MONTGOMERIE,R.D.AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1988. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Quarterly Review of Biology 63:167 187. MORRISON, M. L. 2001. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:613 623. MUCHAI,M.AND M. A. DU PLESSIS. 2005. Nest predation of grassland bird species increases with parental activity at the nest. Journal of Avian Biology 36:110 116. PERRINS, C. M. AND R. H. MCCLEERY. 1989. Laying dates and clutch size in the Great Tit. Wilson Bulletin 101:236 253. PETIT, K. E., L. J. PETIT, AND D. R. PETIT. 1989. Fecal sac removal: do the pattern and distance of dispersal affect the chance of nest predation? Condor 91:479 482. PIETZ, P. J. AND D. A. GRANFORS. 2000. Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:71 87. RASMUSSEN, J. L. AND S. G. SEALY. 2006. Hosts feeding only Brown-headed Cowbird fledglings: where are the host fledglings? Journal of Field Ornithology 77:269 279. REMEŠ, V. 2005. Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58:326 332. ROBINSON, R. A., R. E. GREEN, S. R. BAILLIE, W. J. PEACH, AND D. L. THOMSON. 2004. Demographic mechanisms of the population decline of the Song Thrush Turdus philomelos in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:670 682. ROPER, J. J. AND R. R. GOLDSTEIN. 1997. A test of the Skutch Hypothesis: does activity at nests increase nest predation risk? Journal of Avian Biology 28:111 116. ROWE, L., D. LUDWIG, AND D. SCHLUTER. 1994. Time, condition, and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. American Naturalist 143:698 722. SAMSON, F. B., F. L. KNOPF, AND W. R. OSTLIE. 2004. Great Plains ecosystems: past, present, and future. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:6 15.

698 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 126, No. 4, December 2014 SAMSON, F. AND F. KNOPF. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. BioScience 44:418 421. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 2010. SAS Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA. SEALY, S. G. 1992. Removal of Yellow Warbler eggs in association with cowbird parasitism. Condor 94:40 54. SHAFFER, T. L. 2004. A unified approach to analyzing nest success. Auk 121:526 540. SLAGSVOLD, T. 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia 54:159 169. THOMPSON III, F. R., W. DIJAK, AND D. E. BURHANS. 1999. Video identification of predators at songbird nests in old fields. Auk 116:259 264. TRYJANOWSKI, P. AND A. GOLAWSKI. 2004. Sex differences in nest defence by the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: effects of offspring age, brood size, and stage of breeding season. Journal of Ethology 22:13 16. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. (USFWS). 2013. Endangered species database. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA. www.fws.gov/endangered/index.html. VONESH, J. R. AND O. DE LACRUZ. 2002. Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines. Oecologia 133:325 333. WINTER, M. 1999. Nesting biology of Dickcissels and Henslow s sparrows in southwestern Missouri prairie fragments. Wilson Bulletin 111:515 527. WOOLFENDEN, B. E., H. L. GIBBS, C. M. MCLAREN, AND S. G. SEALY. 2004. Community-level patterns of parasitism: use of three common hosts by a brood parasitic bird, the Brown-headed Cowbird. Ecoscience 11:238 248. WRAY II, T., K. A. STRAIT, AND R. C. WHITMORE. 1982. Reproductive success of grassland sparrows on a reclaimed surface mine in West Virginia. Auk 99:157 164. ZANETTE, L., D. T. HAYDON, J. N. M. SMITH, M. J. TAITT, AND M. CLINCHY. 2007. Reassessing the cowbird threat. Auk 124:210 223. APPENDIX 1. Model averaged parameter estimates for temporal models of Savannah Sparrows, Vesper Sparrows, and Baird s Sparrows in southeast Alberta, 2010 2011. Model averaged results for Western Meadowlarks and Sprague s Pipits are not presented, because the null model was the top model. AGE represents the age of the nest, and DATE represents the date at which the nest was active. Higher order terms include all lower order terms (e.g., AGE 3 includes AGE 2 and AGE). Parameter Estimate Standard error Lower 85% CI Upper 85% CI Vesper Sparrow Intercept 22.0255 11.5518 218.66 14.6091 AGE 1.4356 2.1341 21.6376 4.5087 AGE 2 20.0753 0.1115 20.2358 0.0852 AGE 3 0.0017 0.0008 0.0005 0.0028 DATE 0.0558 0.1720 20.1918 0.3035 DATE 2 20.0001 0.0216 20.0312 0.0310 Savannah Sparrow Intercept 22.7685 6.9134 212.724 7.1868 AGE 1.8641 1.9093 20.8854 4.6136 AGE 2 20.1196 0.1245 20.2989 0.0597 AGE 3 0.0023 0.0005 0.0015 0.003 DATE 20.0215 0.0355 20.0726 0.0297 DATE 2 0.0001 0.0003 20.0003 0.0004 Baird s Sparrow Intercept 6.6092 11.8077 210.394 23.6123 AGE 0.0205 0.9041 21.2814 1.3224 AGE 2 20.0636 0.1104 20.2225 0.0953 AGE 3 0.0014 0.001 20.0001 0.0029 DATE 0.0154 0.0174 20.0097 0.0405