Detection of Subclinical Mastitis in Small Ruminants on Six farms in Northern Tanzania

Similar documents
Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Detection of Mastitis

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

, Pamela L. Ruegg

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in small holder dairy farms in Selale, North Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Mastitis in Dairy Goats 1

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

Profitable Milk System

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

New Model. Digital Mastitis Detector. Reduce of risk at early stage

Bovine Mastitis: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus in Small Holder Herds of Bench Maji Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Johne s Disease Control

Mastitis in non-bovine dairy species, companion animals and breastfeeding mothers. Chris Knight

Influence of Management Techniques on the Levels of Mastitis in an Organic Dairy Herd Mastitis management in organic herd

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Caused by microorganisms (usually bacteria) that invade the udder, multiply, and produce toxins that are harmful to the mammary gland

TITLE: Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Il-10 and Mammary Gland Development. CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: University of Buffalo Buffalo, New York

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

ECONOMICS OF WINTER MILKING FOR MEDIUM TO LARGE DAIRY SHEEP OPERATIONS. Yves M. Berger

Distribution Unlimited

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Dairy Goat Selection Ann Starbard. Monday, April 24, 17

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

A Study on Prevalence and Economic Importance of Mastitis in Dairy Farms in and Around Sebeta, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

A participatory approach to assessing the impact of a community-based animal health project with Maasai communities in Tanzania

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Surveillance of animal brucellosis

AWARENESS OF FARMERS REGARDING HYGIENIC HANDLING OF THEIR CATTLE TO PREVENT ZOONOTIC DISEASES

Vaccination as a Tool to Reduce Mastitis and Improve Milk Quality in Dairy Goats. F.M. Kautz, S. C. Nickerson, and L. O. Ely.

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCE CURRICULUM. Unit 1: Animals in Society/Global Perspective

DAIRY VETERINARY NEWSLETTER

TRYPANOSOMIASIS IN TANZANIA

TO CHARACTERIZE DAIRY GOAT PRODUCTION IN MOUNT KENYA REGION; DETERMINATION OF PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF SUBCLINICAL

Use of a staphylococcal vaccine to reduce prevalence of mastitis and lower somatic cell counts in a registered Saanen dairy goat herd

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

1/1/ K BEAT IT!

Saskatchewan Sheep Opportunity

Johne s Disease. for Goat Owners

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Estimate of milk and curd yield loss of sheep and goats with intrammamary infection and its relation to somatic cell count

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

Economics of mastitis. Kirsten Huijps and Henk Hogeveen

Quad Plate User s Manual

Nonlethal Small-Vessel Stopping With High-Power Microwave Technology

Udder infection and milk somatic cell count, NAGase activity and milk composition fat, protein and lactose in Israeli-Assaf and Awassi sheep

8. MILK Udder health and milk quality is important to farm productivity and profitability. Every farm stands to gain from less mastitis.

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

De Tolakker Organic dairy farm at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Actions and Outcomes of Wisconsin Dairy Farms Completing Milk Quality Teams

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

Factors of Variation Influencing Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count in Dairy Sheep

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

Mastitis: The Canadian Perspective

Canada s Dairy Industry: Surveillance Challenges and Opportunities

Transcription:

Detection of Subclinical Mastitis in Small Ruminants on Six farms in Northern Tanzania Introduction Small ruminants represent an important role in the pastoral life of the Maasai people of northern Tanzania. Although the Maasai culture centers on cattle, East African goats and Fat-tailed sheep are the predominant livestock in this area and are extensively managed on free range semi-arid landscape. The milk and meat from these animals are a main component of the Maasai diet. The milk is often consumed hot, combined with tea and spices and served as chai. The Maasai pastoralists also consume fresh or fermented milk. While both milk and meat are nutritionally important to these people, these animals are used for subsistence rather than high production. Because of this the estimated number of lactating small ruminants ranges from 5 to 20% of the typical herd or flock, and sheep and goats are managed and raised as one group. This study was conducted in the Mondului district near the town of Gelai, a remote area which represents the traditional lifestyle of the Masaai. One water source from a nearby mountain spring, supplies two main water supply points for the entire area. Most of the residents live in smaller surrounding villages, or "bomas", comprised of traditional homes constructed of dung and stick, and encircled by fences made of thorny acacia braches. The homes have dirt floors and thatched roofs, with very poor ventilation. Young lambs and kids are housed inside the homes at night, while the adult livestock are housed within the thorn fences of the bomas. The typical day begins with the women collecting dung to patch the houses, then milking the livestock and preparing a meal. Because water is scarce, there is no hand-washing or proper teat sanitation prior 20054102 0146

to milking. These common practices would lend evidence that there is a potential for a high prevalence of mastitis among all livestock, including the small ruminants. Mastitis is inflammation of the mammary gland and can be caused by several different bacterial and/or viral infections. Chronic infection of the mammary gland can lead fibrous replacement of glandular tissue, which can cause a significant decrease in milk production and quality. Further more, some of the common microbes which cause mastitis could serve as sources of food-borne illnesses and zoonotic diseases such as Staphylococcus aureus and Eschericia coli. (Smith). An important first step in analyzing this potential risk is determining if mastitis is present within the small ruminant population. However, few studies have researched the presence and/or prevalence of mastitis in small ruminants under these conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine if subclinical mastitis is present in small ruminants of the Maasai pastoralists in one area of the Monduli district in Northern Tanzania. Materials and Methods Based on evidence extrapolated from other studies (Ndegwa et al, 2000, ) the prevalence of subclinical mastitis, of the approximately 15,000 small ruminants within a 5 mile radius of Gelai was estimated at 15%. It was also estimated that of this same population, 5-20% of small ruminants were lactating at any one time, depending on several factors, such as seasonal climate and recent rainfalls. A minimum sample size for detection was calculated using statistical software (Win Episcope 2.0).

California Mastitis Tests (CMT) were conducted on 27 goats and 5 sheep for a total sample size of 32 animals, following manufacturer's instructions (ImmuCell, California Mastitis Test). Clean, filtered water was used to rinse the paddles between animals. All animals sampled were lactating from both udder halves and both halves were being milked by the owners twice daily. Lambs and kids were allowed access to the ewes and does only at dusk and dawn. Results were recorded and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Records included sample number, owner's name, description of the animal, GPS location, date, and CMT scores. For the purpose of this study, age and stage of lactation were not recorded. CMT scores of 2 or greater were recorded as a positive result. Results Of the 32 animals tested, 27 (84.38%) were East African goats and 5 (15.62%) were Fat-tailed sheep. None of the sheep had a positive CMT while 4 (14.82%) goats tested positive. The overall prevalence of the animals tested of 12.5% as summarized in Table 1. Table 1. CMT Results by Type of Animal Positive CMT Negative CMT Total Caprine 4 (12.5%) 23 (71.88%) 27 (84.38%) Ovine 0 (0%) 5 (15.62%) 5 (15.62%) Total 4(12.5%) 28 (87.5%) 32 (100%) The data were also analyzed by udder half, left and right. There were 7 (10.94%) positive halves and 57 (89.06%) negative halves, and of the positive halves 4 (57.14%)

were from the left half, while 3 (42.86%) were from the right half, as summarized in Table 2. Table 2. CMT Results by Udder Left Udder Half Right Udder Half Total Positive CMT 4 (57.14%) 3 (42.86%) 7 (10.94%) Negative CMT 28 (49.12%) 29 (50.88%) 57 (89.06%) Total 32 32 64 The 7 positive samples were Comprised of 5 (71.43%) positive udder halves having a CMT score of 2, and 2 (28.57%) udder halves having scores of 3, as summarized in Table 3. Table 3. CMT Scores of Individual Animals Recorded by Udder and Type of Animal Left Udder Half Right Udder Half Total Halves Species 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Caprine 18 5 3 1 21 3_2 54 Ovine 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 10 Total 23 5 3 1 26 3 2 1 64 Discussion 4 out of 32 small ruminants tested were considered to have positive CMT results. These results suggest subclinical mastitis is present in small ruminants in the Gelai area. More extensive sampling and testing, including cultures, should be performed to describe and characterize the subclinical mastitis within this population. Due to the lack of resources, including clinical laboratories, we were unable to accomplish this in the current study. Most bomas lie within a 5-mile radius area from the main town making sampling time consuming but relatively consistent. Although a current census was not available, the human population is estimated at 17,000 (Mwenye Kiti, Gelai-Meru Goi, 2005.).

Despite an elevation range of 3,000-5,800 feet above sea level, the agricultural and cultural practices vary little; with the exception of crops, mostly corn, being raised in the higher elevations, but not in lower, more arid elevations. This helped with sampling because of the inherent consistency between farms and the large number of farms to sample. The farms visited were based on pre-existing relationships and acceptance, not randomly selected. Because of the consistency of cultural and agricultural practices between villages, this probably did not influence the results of this detection study. Because of the lack of proper hygienic techniques, the prevalence of subclinical mastitis, used to calculate sample size, in this population was estimated to be higher than that of goats in a previous dairy goat study, 15% versus 9.8% respectively (Ndegwa et al, 2000) but less than the prevalence of subclinical mastitis of dairy cows stated in a separate study (Bishi.), 15% versus 15.9% respectively. Caprine milk tends to have higher leukocyte counts than bovine milk (Smith, 2002.), thus the CMT results were considered positive with a score of 2 or greater. CMT scores less than 2 were considered to be negative. Despite these possible differences between bovine milk and caprine and ovine milk, the CMT has been shown to be a reliable method for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in caprine (Maisi, 1988). The CMT is a relatively simple field screening test for subclinical mastitis, but few pastoralists have access to even this level of technology. An agglutinating reaction occurs when the CMT reagent combines with leukocytes within a milk sample. Milk levels of leukocytes tend to be elevated whenever infection is present within the mammary gland. CMT scoring is based on the subjective interpretation of the agglutination reaction, with 3 being the highest score and associated with the greatest

number of leukocytes. Only one person read all the tests in order to minimize inconsistency between test results. The CMT is relatively inexpensive and foreign material such as dirt and hair will not interfere significantly with the test. (Unl.edu CMT). There are four basic forms of mastitis: peracute, acute, subacute, and subclinical. It is important to diagnose subclinical mastitis for several reasons. Subclinical mastitis is estimated to be 15 to 40 times more prevalent than clinical, or observable, mastitis. Subclinical mastitis usually precedes the clinical form and has a longer duration, thus often reducing milk production and milk quality without recognition by the subsistence farmer (UFL, Mastitis in Dairy Goats). Studies have shown subclinical mastitis can cause a 53% and 30% reduction in milk yield in sheep and goats respectively (Gonzalo et al., 1994, Leitner et all, 2004). This decrease in milk production can also lead to the nutritional demise of kids and lambs. In a culture which relies so heavily on sheep and goats to combination of decreased milk for human consumption and the subsequent decrease in meat production could become catastrophic in a short period of time. Further studies are needed to determine the true prevalence of subclinical mastitis in this small ruminant population, both at the individual level and the herd level. The estimated prevalence from this study is 12.5% (4 of 32). This is slightly less than the previously estimated value of 15%, but still not as low as similar studies (Ndegwa et al, 2000). Because this was not a prevalence study, no conclusions can be made regarding the significance of these differences. Several confounders could be considered, but the two most significant confounders in a prevalence study of this population would likely be age and stage of lactation. Age would be difficult to document because culturally, the Maasai do not track

age. Stage of lactation, however, could be classified relatively easily since most owners do have an idea of when the animal began lactation, at least relative to the other animals in the herd. Although not confounders, some effect modifiers which could also affect the results of a prevalence study would include, herd prevalence of contagious mastitis, season, and the prevalence of other diseases, such as Ovine Progressive Pneumonia (OPP) and Caprine Arthritis and Encephalitis (CAE). OPP and CAE are both lentiviruses which can cause severe fibrosis and agalactia (Smith, 2002). This can lead to a condition commonly referred to as hard bag or hard udder. This condition could easily be misdiagnosed as a severe mastitis. Sampling would be difficult because of the remote location, and acceptance by pastoralists. There are some central areas which could be utilized for sampling, but there would probably need to be some sort of incentive for the local pastorialists to be interested in participating and overcome their suspicions of outsiders. A verbal questionnaire in the study would be needed to assess agricultural practices, herd size, percent of herd lactating, etc. Also, cultures of the milk would be more easily obtained if the animals came to a central location. These cultures would be used to validate the CMT results, and to further characterize the subclinical mastitis. Characterizing the subclinical mastitis would be an important step in prevention and treatment. Some bacteria such as Mycoplasma mycoides has a more dramatic effect on the health of the offspring (Smith 2002.) than do other microbes, such as Staphylococcus aureus, which may have a more direct health effect on humans. Regardless of the cause, the basic control plan needs to center around education, prevention, and surveillance.

Education should include participatory assessment and training, which is likely to be sustainable (Catley, 2002). First the pastoralists must understand the problem and learn how to detect it. They must also be able to see an advantage in changing the current situation; otherwise they will not embrace ownership of a program, which is vital to the long term success of a control program. Some control measures common in developed areas may be ineffective or unattainable in this environment. Slight modifications in traditional practices may be more advantageous. Milking the animals before gathering the dung, as well as milking the first lactation stage animals first, could be advantageous, as well as hand washing, although water is scarce. Likewise, brushing the dirt off the teat and discarding the first few strippings of milk are more realistic practices than the application of betadine teat preparations. Quantifying milk production and recording lactation data would be helpful to show a positive difference in a control plan. Culling the sickest animals and testing for diseases such as OPP and CAE may be difficult, but if combined with other services by paravets, they could be options. The extralabel use of drugs and poor observance of milk withdrawl times would also be important factors to considered, both for herd health as well as human health.

REFERENCES 1. UFL, Mastitis in Dairy Goats 2. The Merck Veterinary Manual, p.1009-1016, 3 rd edition, Susan E. AieIlo, B.S., D.V.M., E.L.S. editor, Merck &co. Inc, Whitehouse Station, N.J., 1998 3. Unl.edu CMT 4. Smith P. Bradford, Large Animal Internal Medicine, 3 rd edition, p. 1032, mosbylnc., St. Louis MO., 2002. 5. Personal interview with town council chairman, Mwenye Kiti, June 13, 2005. 6. Gonzalo, C., J. A. Carriedo, J. A. Baro, and F. S. Primitivo. 1994. Factors influencing variations of test-day milk yield, somatic-cell count, fat and protein in dairy sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1537-1542 7 Leitner,G., U. Merin and N. Silanikove. 2004. Changes in Milk Composition as Affected by Subclinical Mastitis in Goats. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1719-1726 8. Ndegwa EN, Mulei CM, Munyua SJ. 2000. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy goats in Kenya. J S Afr Vet Assoc. Mar;71(1):25-7 9. Maisi P, Riipinen I. 1988 Use of California Mastitis Test, N-acetyl-betaglucosaminidase, and antitrypsin to diagnose caprine subclinical mastitis. J Dairy Res. Aug;55(3):309-14. 10. http://wwwl.vetmed.fu-berlin.de/ip_3bishi.htm, viewed 2 Jun 2005. 11. Sherman, David M., Tending Animals in the Global Village a Guide to International Veterinary Medicine, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2002. 12. Catley, Andy, S. Blakeway, T. Leyland, Community-based Animal Healthcare a Practical Guide to Improving Primary Veterinary Services, ITDG Publishing, London, 2002.

Ulm Eo xo0(- * -

3; a) o F- V ci ri Cl) OC Cl) Cl) Cl) 0 4-u Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) fr 0 0 0 0 0

z N I; z A K fr I

o 0-00 Ct I.0 0 0 0

A A 4 Th * 0 c) 12 fr

E4U0 -~4-j 0L -I4-0 cn 4-- U) _0 7) -f- (1)~~ -0m= 0 En0 0 L

F- 4 0 x- 0 0 0+ 0 0n 4-4- - el) 4--0 -- TO 0 g2+ > '14 +-~ *- 1 *-o LL

L 4+- 0 0 L c) o L 0@ 0 0 K

LOL N + Lo o - 0% >%, Lu

0 0 00N 001 00 xn 00 _o m cq 4) 0 4-1 0 0~ 0.0 C ) CL Ana 0

0 xi u0 x4- ~ ci)3 Ifc44-. 0 C... ci)> nv > CA)) 'f 4-0L ~ a =31 0oci 0L 0 m

Con c0 0 o OC~poll"r ~(D 4- y Cl

cdo 010 0o

THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS ARTICLE ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT REFLECT THE OFFICIAL POLICY OR POSITION OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.

OCT 21 2i REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden tor this collection ot intormatlon is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the Form Approved IOMB No. 0704-0188 tor reviewing 0MB instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washinoton. DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 18.Oct.05 MAJOR REPORT 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS DETECTION OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS IN SMALL RUMINANTS ON SIX FARMS IN NORTHERN TANZANIA 6. AUTHOR(S) CAPT LEHMAN MARK W 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY REPORT NUMBER C104-1687 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AGENCY REPORT NUMBER AFIT/CIA, BLDG 125 2950 P STREET WPAFB OH 45433 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Unlimited distribution In Accordance With AFI 35-205/AFIT Sup 1 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 22 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACI OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) (EG) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18 Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 94