ORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota

Similar documents
93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

St. Paul City Ordinance

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

CHAPTER 6.10 DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG

RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

ORDINANCE NO

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

Dog Licensing Regulation

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

LAW AND ORDER CODE Title 16 Animal Control

Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL


ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

POLICE REGULATIONS VII. POLICE REGULATIONS Dogs

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

ORDINANCE NO

Chapter 8.02 DOGS AND CATS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

DOG REGULATION AND LICENSES

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Title 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Animal Cruelty, Dangerous Dogs, Registration and Rabies Control Act of 2008

CHAPTER 2.26 ANIMAL CONTROL

(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

BY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS

CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322

Island requires the regulation thereof in the public interest, convenience and necessity.

WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO

Section 3: Title: The title of this law shall be, DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BOLTON.

TITLE 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS

DANGEROUS DOGS AND WILD ANIMALS

CHAPTER XII ANIMALS. .2 ANIMAL. Animal means every living creature, other than man, which may be affected by rabies.

BY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

2.1 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE CITY OF HERNANDO, MISSISSIPPI

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA. Ordinance No. ORD Regulation of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBANY MUNICIPAL CODE (AMC) 6.18, "DANGEROUS DOGS," AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.

TOWN OF CABOT, VERMONT ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS & WOLF-HYBRIDS

September 25, Glynn County Board of Commissioners. Matt Doering, Chief of Police

ORDINANCE NO DANGEROUS ANIMALS, ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE, PROHIBITED ANIMALS

ANIMALS. Gilmer County Code Chapter 14. Article I. In General Secs Reserved.

Dog Control Ordinance

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Sec. 2. Authority. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the authority granted in 7 M.R.S.A. s3950 and 30-M.R.S.A.s3001.

Page 47-1 rev

Town of Northumberland LOCAL LAW 3 OF 2010 DOG CONTROL LAW

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 6, 2007

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS Dog Control Bylaw

The City Council shall have the authority to create and provide for a City pound, which may be located within or without the City limits.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA PERTAINING TO VICIOUS, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND PUBLIC NUISANCE DOGS

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

County Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

ANIMALS ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

City of Grand Island

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOG *

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

2008 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE September 5th, 2008 / Draft #3

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF POWASSAN BY-LAW NO ***********************************************************************

BEAUFORT COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE BEAUFORT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

CHAPTER 14 RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NO. 07-3 RESOLUTION NO. 070620-4 APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS AND THE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE DESIGNATION AND REGISTRATION OF SAID DOGS. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHISAGO COUNTY ORDAINS: SECTION 1: TITLE & JURISDICTION This Ordinance shall be known, cited, and referred to as the Chisago County Dangerous Dog Ordinance, except as referred to herein, where it shall be known as this Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all animals found or located in the unincorporated areas of Chisago County, Minnesota, and not within any town, city, or municipality. SECTION 2: PURPOSE AND INTENT It is the intent of Chisago County to protect the health and safety of the public against the risks that dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs pose to persons and other animals in the County. By their very nature, dogs that are classified as dangerous or potentially dangerous pose a direct threat to the people and other animals that live in the same community or may otherwise come into contact with the dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs. Further, it is the intent of Chisago County to afford dog owners due process when the owner s dog is classified as a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog, consistent with Minn. Stat. 347.50 -.56 or other related laws. This Ordinance shall not apply to dogs not considered dangerous or potentially dangerous, nor shall this Ordinance impact the regulation or control of other animals, whether wild or domestic. SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS A. Animal Control Officer. For the purposes of this Ordinance, An Animal Control Officer is an individual acting as an agent of Chisago County, either by means of employment, contract or other lawful authorization, assigned to regulating dogs or other animals and enforcement of this Ordinance or any applicable statutes or ordinances governing animal complaints in the unincorporated areas of Chisago County. B. Board. Board shall mean the Chisago County Board of Commissioners.

C. County. The County shall mean the County of Chisago, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. D. Dangerous Dog. A Dangerous Dog is one which: 1. Inflicts substantial bodily harm on a human being, without provocation, on public or private property; or, 2. Kills a domestic animal, without provocation, while off the property of the owner or custodian; or, 3. Has been found to be a Potentially Dangerous Dog and after the owner has received notice that the animal is Potentially Dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. E. Proper Enclosure. Proper Enclosure means the manner in which an animal is securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or kennel suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing protection for the animal from the elements. A proper enclosure does not include a porch, patio or any part of a house, garage, or other structure that would allow the animal to exit of its own volition; the same upon or into which the public may lawfully enter; or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which door or window screens are the only barriers preventing the animal from exiting. F. Great Bodily Harm. Great bodily harm has the meaning as assigned to it under Minn. Stat. 609.02, Subdivision 8. G. Hearing Officer. Hearing Officer means a person who is designated by the Chisago County Board, is appointed to an Appeal Hearing by the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, and tasked with making a determination in an appeal of a designation of dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog. The Hearing Officer shall preside over the Appeal Hearing, and based upon evidence presented at said hearing the Hearing Officer, shall issue Findings and Determination as to whether a dog is dangerous or potentially dangerous. H. Kill or Kills. To kill or kills shall mean the existence of a direct causal connection between the act of the attacking dog and the death of the person or other animal. For domestic animals which are euthanized following such an attack, kill or kills shall mean the death was the direct and inescapable consequence of the attack; extensive veterinarian assistance would be ultimately be futile and only temporarily prolong the life of the animal; and that euthanasia merely hastened the inevitable death of the victim animal. I. Microchip or Microchipped. The term microchip or microchipped shall mean the device or implantation of the device, authorized by, and generally

accepted by, the veterinary community, to be permanently implanted in the dog, allowing for permanent identification of the dog and the dog s owner, via scanning and reading of the microchip through the dog s skin, and hair or fur. J. Owner. Owner shall mean any person or persons, firm, association or corporation owning, possessing, keeping, harboring, having an interest in, or having care, custody and control of an animal. Any person keeping or harboring an animal for five (5) consecutive days shall, for the purposes of this Ordinance, be deemed to be the owner of thereof. K. Potentially Dangerous Dog. Potentially Dangerous Dog shall mean a dog which: 1. When unprovoked, has bitten a human or a domestic animal on public or private property; or 2. When unprovoked, has chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property, other than the animal owner's property, in an apparent attitude of attack; or 3. Has a known history or propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. L. Running at Large. The phrase Running at Large shall mean any animal which is: 1. Not effectively contained within a fenced area on private property; 2. Not effectively restrained by chain or leash, to private property with the consent of the property owner; or 3. Not effectively restrained by a chain or leash, not exceeding eight (8) feet in length. M. Substantial Bodily Harm. Substantial bodily harm has the meaning assigned to it under Minn. Stat. 609.02, Subd. 7a. N. Unprovoked. Unprovoked shall mean the condition in which the animal is not purposefully excited, stimulated, agitated or disturbed. It shall be a rebuttable presumption that any attack on a child twelve (12) years of age or younger shall be considered to be unprovoked unless the child is engaged in the commission of a crime or illegal activity, including activities classified as cruelty to animals as defined in Minnesota Statute 343.

O. Warning. Warning for the purposes of this Ordinance shall mean on the property of the dog owner, or in the location where the dog is maintained, harbored or kept, the display and posting of obviously visible and legible signage indicating the presence of a Potentially Dangerous or Dangerous Dog. Said Warning shall include, when deemed necessary by law enforcement, animal control officer, or the Hearing Officer, the Uniform Dangerous Dog symbol as designed and prepared by the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety. Said symbol, when required, shall be made available to the dog owner, by the Chisago County Sheriff s Department. The Sheriff s Department may require a reasonable fee for copies of the designated Uniform Dangerous Dog symbol. SECTION 4: PROHIBITIONS A. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, possess, keep, harbor, or have in one s possession a Potentially Dangerous Dog or Dangerous Dog, except as provided in this Ordinance. B. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, possess, keep, harbor, or maintain a dog after having been ordered to relinquish or release a dog pursuant to the Order of a Hearing Officer, the County Board, or the District Court, when able to do so or reasonably able to direct others to do so on the person s behalf. C. Penalty. 1. Any person found to have violated the conditions for maintaining, harboring or keeping a Potentially Dangerous or Dangerous Dog as required under this Ordinance, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $1,000 fine and/or 90 days in jail. 2. Any person who willfully fails to comply with the Order of a Hearing Officer, the County Board or District Court, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $1,000 fine and/or 90 days in jail. SECTION 5: POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG - DESIGNATION A. Designation as Potentially Dangerous Dog. 1. Any law enforcement officer, the animal control officer, or other authorized agent of the county, shall designate any dog as a Potentially Dangerous Dog upon information and belief that the dog meets any of the criteria in Section 3, K.

2. When a dog is designated Potentially Dangerous, law enforcement, the animal control officer or other authorized agent, shall cause the owner(s) of the potentially dangerous dog to be notified in writing, by personally serving the owner or a person of suitable age and discretion at the residence of such owner. Service on any one owner, or part or joint-owner, shall be effective as to all owners. 3. Notice requirements. The Notice of Potentially Dangerous Dog shall set forth: a. A description of the dog designated as a Potentially Dangerous Dog; b. The date, time, place, and persons or animals bitten, chased, attacked or threatened by the dog; c. The imposition of conditions determined to be necessary and reasonable to continue owning, maintaining, or harboring of a Potentially Dangerous Dog; d. An advisory, informing the owner(s) that within fourteen (14) days from the date of service, the owner may submit in writing to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, a Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing, thus appealing the determination or the imposition of conditions to be met by the owner(s) as set forth in Section 5.C of this Ordinance; e. An advisory informing the owner(s) that, if the owner does not request a hearing by timely submitting a Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing within fourteen (14) days, the designation of Potentially Dangerous Dog will stand and the owner will be subject to all restrictions and conditions as set forth in the Notice of Potentially Dangerous Dog issued by law enforcement officer, animal control officer or other authorized agent. B. Hearing - Potentially Dangerous Dog 1. If an owner requests a hearing to appeal the designation as a potentially dangerous dog or contests the conditions imposed, the hearing shall be held before a Hearing Officer not more than thirty (30) days after the Chisago County Sheriff s Department is notified of the owner s Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing. The Notice and Request for Hearing shall be made directly to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, and a written request must be submitted within the specified time period. 2. At any time following the potentially dangerous dog designation and pending a hearing, if any, the dog may be seized and kept by law enforcement or

animal control, unless the owner shows proof, satisfactory to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, that the dog has met the requirements for rabies vaccinations, distemper, and/or other conditions; is kept only in a proper enclosure, unless restrained on a leash with muzzle; and is otherwise maintained under circumstances which do not present an unreasonable risk of harm to persons or other domestic animals. All costs related to seizing the dog shall be borne by the dog owner(s). 3. At the hearing over which the Hearing Officer shall preside, the records of law enforcement and animal control officers related to the alleged bite(s), attack(s), or threatening behavior, medical or veterinarian records, and all reliable hearsay directly related to the alleged bite(s), attack(s) or behavior shall be admissible for consideration by the Hearing Officer without further foundation. 4. Law enforcement or the animal control officer shall be represented by the Chisago County Attorney s Office. The owner may be represented by legal counsel, although the owner is not entitled to legal representation at public expense. 5. At the hearing, law enforcement and/or the animal control officer and the owner may present live testimony of witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, and present documents to support their respective positions. The County Attorney s Office and the owner of the dog may apply to the District Court for subpoenas to compel the testimony of witnesses. 6. After considering all evidence relating to the alleged bite(s), attack(s), or threatening behavior, the Hearing Officer shall make such Findings and Order as the Hearing Officer deems proper, including: Upholding the potentially dangerous dog designation; requiring the implantation of the microchip, as set forth in Section 3, I of this Ordinance; directing law enforcement or the animal control officer to seize the dog and take the dog into custody, if not previously seized; and, imposing of any other conditions appropriate for conditions appropriate for continued keeping, harboring, or maintaining a Potentially Dangerous Dog; whether or not set forth in Section 5, C of this Ordinance. C. Conditions of Maintaining Potentially Dangerous Dog. 1. The owner of a dog that has been designated as a potentially dangerous dog by law enforcement, animal control officer, or Hearing Officer must arrange for the dog to be microchipped, as set forth in Section 3, I of this Ordinance;

2. The owner must provide proof of vaccination for rabies, distemper, or other conditions, and provide written verification of said vaccination to the Chisago County Sheriff s Office; 3. The owner must post notice and warning of the presence of a Potentially Dangerous Dog on the front and back of the property, using signs and language that is understandable to children; 4. The owner and dog may be required to successfully complete an approved dog obedience class and provide proof of that successful completion to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department. Failure to successfully complete the course in a timely manner, if mandated, may result in the seizure of the animal by law enforcement or animal control officer; 5. The dog may be required to be kept in a proper enclosure, or be restrained by chain or leash not to exceed ten (10) feet in length, and muzzled, and under the control of a person eighteen (18) years of age or older at all times it is outdoors and not inside a proper enclosure; and 6. The owner shall register the dog as Potentially Dangerous, and pay any corresponding fees that may be established by the County Board. SECTION 6: DANGEROUS DOG - DESIGNATION A. Designation as Dangerous Dog. 1. Any law enforcement officer, the animal control officer, or other authorized agent of the county shall designate any animal as a Dangerous Dog upon information and belief that the animal meets any of the criteria in Section 3, D. 2. When a dog is designated a Dangerous Dog, law enforcement, the animal control officer or other authorized agent shall cause the owner(s) of the Dangerous Dog to be notified in writing of the designation by personally serving the owner or person of suitable age and discretion at the residence of such owner. Service on any one owner or part or joint-owner shall be effective service as to all owners. 3. Notice requirements. This notice shall set forth: a. A description of the dog designated as a Dangerous Dog; b. The date, time, place, and person or persons who are alleged to have sustained substantial bodily harm or the animal(s) alleged to

have been killed, bitten, or attacked by the dog; c. The imposition of conditions determined to be necessary and reasonable for continued ownership, maintaining, or harboring of a Dangerous Dog as set forth in Section 6.C of this ordinance; d. An advisory informing the owner(s) that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service, the owner may submit in writing to Chisago County Sheriff s Department, a Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing, thus appealing the determination or the imposition of conditions to be met by the owner(s); and, e. An advisory informing the owner(s) that if the owner does not request a hearing by submitting a Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing within fourteen (14) days, the designation of Dangerous Dog will stand and the owner will be subject to all restrictions and conditions as set forth in the Notice of Dangerous Dog by law enforcement officer, animal control officer or other authorized agent. B. Hearing - Dangerous Dog. 1. If an owner requests a hearing to appeal the designation as a Dangerous Dog, the hearing shall be held before a Hearing Officer not more than thirty (30) days after the Chisago County Sheriff s Department is notified of the owner s Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing. The Notice and Request for Hearing shall be made directly to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, and a written request must be submitted within the specified time period. 2. At any time following the Dangerous Dog Designation, pending a hearing, if any, the dog may be seized and kept by law enforcement or animal control, unless the owner shows proof, satisfactory to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department, that the dog has met the requirements for proper vaccinations against rabies, distemper, or other conditions; is kept only in a proper enclosure, unless restrained on a leash with muzzle; and is otherwise maintained under circumstances, which do not present an unreasonable risk of harm to persons or other domestic animals. All costs related to seizing the dog shall be borne by the Dog owner(s). 3. At the hearing over which the Hearing Officer shall preside, the records of law enforcement and animal control officer related to the alleged bite(s), attack(s) or behavior, medical or veterinarian records, and all reliable hearsay directly related to the alleged attack(s) shall be admissible for consideration by the Hearing Officer without further foundation.

4. Law enforcement or the animal control officer shall be represented by the Chisago County Attorney s Office. The owner may be represented by legal counsel, although the owner is not entitled to legal representation at public expense. 5. At the hearing, law enforcement and the animal control officer, and the owner may present the live testimony of witnesses, cross-examine witnesses and present documents to support their respective positions. The Chisago County Attorney s Office and the owner of the dog may apply to the District Court for subpoenas to compel the testimony of witnesses. 6. After considering all evidence relating to the alleged bite(s), attack(s), or behavior, including upholding of the dangerous dog designation, the Hearing Officer shall make such Findings and Determination as the Hearing Officer deems proper, directing law enforcement or the animal control officer to seize the dog and take the dog into custody, if not previously seized by law enforcement or the animal control officer; or, may require the owner to comply with any, or all conditions for continued keeping, harboring, or maintaining a dangerous dog whether or not set forth in Section 6, C. 7. Failure to Release Dog Following Hearing. Any owner or person who posses, keeps, harbors or maintains a Dangerous Dog and who refuses to release to or fails to produce for law enforcement or animal control officer pursuant to the demand of law enforcement or animal control officer, following a determination by the Hearing Officer, upholding the designation as a Dangerous Dog shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 8. Authority to Order Destruction of Dog. The Hearing Officer, upon confirming a Dangerous Dog designation, is authorized to order, as part of the disposition of the case, that the dog be destroyed based upon findings that either of the following criteria is present: a. The dog is dangerous, as demonstrated by a vicious attack, an unprovoked attack, and attack without warning, or multiple attacks and the owner of the dog as demonstrated by an inability or unwillingness to sufficiently control the dog in order to prevent injury to persons or other animals; or, b. The owner cannot, will not, does not, or otherwise refused to provide proof of liability insurance for the dog as required by Section 6 C. 2. a. C. Registration and Conditions of Maintaining Dangerous Dog. 1. A person seeking to own, possess, keep, harbor, or maintain a Dangerous Dog within the county, must comply with the following:

a. Microchip: The owner, must as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 14 days after the designation or confirmation of the Dangerous Dog designation, have the dog microchipped with approved device, as defined by Section 3, I of this Ordinance. If the dog has been seized, the owner must arrange for the dog to be microchipped before or at the time of release from custody of animal control officer. The name of the microchip manufacturer and identification number of the microchip must be provided to the animal control authority. If the microchip is not implanted by the owner, it may be implanted by a qualified veterinarian under the direction of the animal control officer. In either case, all costs related to implantation of the microchip must be borne by the dog s owner; b. Registration: No person may own or possess a Dangerous Dog in this County unless the dog is registered as provided in this Ordinance or applicable state law. (1) All dogs deemed dangerous by the Animal Control Authority or hearing officer, as applicable, shall be registered as a dangerous dog with the sheriff s office within fourteen (14) days after the date the dog was so deemed. (2)The owner must, at the time of registration submit pay an annual registration fee of $200.00; c. Vaccination: At the time of registration and as a condition of maintaining the dog in the owner s care, the dog owner must provide proof of proper vaccinations against rabies, distemper, or other conditions and provide proof of such vaccination annually upon renewal of registration; 2. A dog owner seeking to possess, keep, harbor, or maintain a Dangerous Dog on the owner s property, the owner s residence, or other property under the owner s control must comply with the following: a. Liability Insurance: At the time of registration and as a condition of maintaining the dog in the owner s care, the dog owner must provide public liability insurance, pre-paid, in full, in the minimum amount of five-hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per person and one million ($1,000,000) per incident, payable to any person or persons injured by the dangerous dog; or provide proof of a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least five-hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per person and one million dollars ($1,000,000) per incident insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog; and, b. Proper Enclosure: The dog must be maintained in a Proper Enclosure as defined in Section 3, E of this Ordinance; and c. Display Warning/Posting as Dangerous Dog: If the Chisago County Sheriff s Department registers the Dangerous Dog, allowing for

possessing, keeping, harboring, or maintaining, the owner must clearly post the property with the Uniform Dangerous Dog symbol as specified by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Posting must include the front and rear of the owner s property and the proper enclosure in which the dog is maintained, the property must be clearly posted with the Uniform Dangerous Dog symbol as specified by the Commissioner of Public Safety. The dog must continually display on the dog s collar the Uniform Dangerous Dog symbol/tag; and, d. Proper Restraint: The dog must be restrained by chain or leash not to exceed ten (10) feet in length, must be muzzled, and under the physical control of a person eighteen (18) years of age or older at all times it is outdoors and not inside a proper enclosure. SECTION 7: APPEALS, REVIEWS AND COMPLIANCE A. Appeals of Determinations. 1. Appeal of Determination. Any dog owner aggrieved by the decision of the Hearing Officer may, within five (5) business days of the date the Hearing Officer s determination is issued and filed with the Clerk of the Board, file with the Clerk of the County Board a written Request for Hearing before the Board of Commissioners. a. The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a hearing within thirty (30) days of such demand. The Board of commissioners shall review the matter, de novo, and issue its written Findings and Order within seven (7) days of its hearing, either upholding, modifying, or overturning the hearing officer decision; 2. Appeal of County Board. An owner may seek review of the Board s Order by filing within fourteen (14) business days of the filing of the Board s Order, the appropriate pleadings in District Court. 3. The owner or owners of the dog shall be liable for all actual costs of care, keeping, and/or disposal of the dog, except to the extent that a Court, the Board, or a hearing officer finds that the seizure or impoundment, if any, was not justified. The costs must be paid in full, or a mutually satisfactory arrangement for payment must be made between the County and the person claiming ownership of the dog, before the dog is returned to the person, or within ninety (90) days of disposal of the dog. B. Review of Designation. Beginning one year after a dog is declared a Dangerous Dog, an owner may request annually that the Chisago County Sheriff s Department or animal control

officer review the designation. The owner may provide evidence that the dog s behavior has changed due to the dog s age, sterilization, environment, completion of obedience training, or other factors. If the Chisago County Sheriff s Department finds sufficient evidence that the dog s behavior has changed, the Chisago County Sheriff s Department may rescind the dangerous dog designation. C. Compliance with Designation. 1. Upon receipt of the Hearing Officer s Findings and Determination, the owner or custodian of the dog shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the original Notice, or if modified by the Hearing Officer, set forth in the Determination and Order of the Hearing Officer. 2. If an owner or custodian of the dog fails to comply with any conditions set forth in the written Notice or as subsequently specified in the Hearing Officer s Determination and Order and fails to request a hearing as provided in Subsection 6.B of this Ordinance, the animal may be seized. 3. Subsequent offenses. If an owner of an animal which has been declared dangerous or potentially dangerous is subject to the conditions of this section and has allegedly failed to comply with the conditions, the animal must be seized by law enforcement or animal control officer. Notice shall be provided to the owner of the basis for the seizure and the right to request a hearing before a Hearing Officer, as set forth in Section 5.B or Section 6.B, to determine whether the conditions were violated. A request for hearing must be made within fourteen (14) days of the seizure. If the owner fails to request a hearing within fourteen (14) days, or is found to have violated the conditions, the designated Hearing Officer shall order the animal destroyed in a proper and humane manner and the owner shall pay the costs of confining the animal. If the owner is found not to have violated the conditions, the owner may reclaim the animal under conditions set by the Chisago County Sheriff s Department or the animal control officer. 4. Failure to comply. Law enforcement or the animal control officer shall immediately seize any dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog if: a. After fourteen (14) days following service upon the owner of the notice that the dog is dangerous or potentially dangerous, or the Hearing Officer s Determination, the dog is not validly registered with the Chisago County Sheriff s Department and there is insufficient information presented to the Chisago County Sheriff s Department to demonstrate that the dog owner has complied with each of the specified conditions of maintaining, keeping or harboring a Dangerous Dog or Potentially Dangerous Dog; and

b. The dog owner has failed to file a Response Notice of Intent to Appeal and Request for Hearing with the Sheriff s Department in a timely manner; failed to file with the Clerk of the County Board a Request for Hearing before the Board of Commissioners; or, pleadings with the district court. SECTION 8: EXEMPTIONS A. Unprovoked and/or Justified. A dog may not be declared dangerous if the threat, injury or damage was sustained by a person who: 1. Was committing at the time, a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner of the dog; 2. Was provoking, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog or who can be shown to have repeatedly, in the past, provoked, tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog; or, 3. Was committing or attempting to commit a crime against the owner or the owner s property. B. Law Enforcement. Dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog designations shall not apply to a law enforcement canine that may attack, bite or cause injury in conjunction with duties related to law enforcement, including apprehension of a criminal suspect. SECTION 9: DESTRUCTION OF DOGS IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES A. Infliction of bodily harm or death. A dog that inflicted death or substantial or great bodily harm on a human being on public or private property without provocation may be destroyed in a proper and humane manner by law enforcement or the animal control officer. The dog may not be destroyed until there has been a reasonable effort to notify the owner consistent with procedures set forth in Sections 5, A, 2 and 6, A, 2of this Ordinance and the dog owner is provided the opportunity for a hearing before a hearing officer, as set forth in Sections 5, B and 6, B of this Ordinance. B. Suffering beyond cure. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance, any dog taken into custody may be immediately disposed of when the dog is suffering and is believed to be beyond cure through reasonable care and treatment upon a written determination by a license doctor of veterinary medicine.

SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be effective and enforceable on June 6, 2007, and shall be published in the official newspaper(s) of Chisago County as provided by Minnesota Statutes. Adopted: June 20, 2007 Mike Robinson, Chair Attest: DeAnna M. Lilienthal Clerk, County Board