THE AVAILABILITY OF YOUNG CHICKS FOR TUMOR TRANSPLANTATION

Similar documents
ON COMMERCIAL poultry farms during

ECONOMIC studies have shown definite

How Does Photostimulation Age Alter the Interaction Between Body Size and a Bonus Feeding Program During Sexual Maturation?

CHICKENS 101 BIOLOGY (ANATOMY, BREEDS, DEVELOPMENT, & REPRODUCTION)

Wheat and Wheat By-Products for Laying Hens

Simplified Rations for Farm Chickens

ON THE TRANSPLANTABILITY OF THE LARVA OF TEh'IA CRASSICOLLIS AND THE PROBABLE R~LE OF THE LIVER IN CYSTICERCUS DISEASE OF RATS

DEPARTMENT #20 OPEN POULTRY

DEPT. 7 POULTRY AGE CLASSIFICATION. Young water fowl born AFTER January 1 of exhibit year. Old Female Chicken born BEFORE January 1 of exhibit year

Egg-citing Activities

Trend of Poultry Business & Management

H POULTRY PROJECT

EGG production of turkeys is not important

Introduction to Animal Science

Poultry Skillathon Study Guide Chicken/ Duck Edition

Best Backyard Chickens Why Wyandotte Chickens are one of my top choices.

POULTRY (All chickens & waterfowl)

DEPT 107- JR. POULTRY

Improving Mongrel Farm Flocks Through Selected Standardbred Cockerels

EXHIBITORS MUST MAKE ONLY ONE ENTRY PER CLASS NUMBER Champion Poultry auction is on Friday at 6:30pm

I. ITs CONCENTRATION IN BLOOD CELLS AND PLASMA AND RELATION TO THE INCUBATION PERIOD BY J. FURTH, M.D.

PHYSIOLOGIC AND GENETIC STUDIES OF CROOKED KEELS IN CHICKENS

R A I S I N G Y O U R H O M E C H I C K E N F L O C K

Superintendents: Gary and Wendy OPEN DIVISION VanderHeiden, (920)

DEPT JR POULTRY

Unit D: Egg Production. Lesson 4: Producing Layers

M housing facilities. This does not mean that an expensive

PRODUCTION BASICS HOW DO I RAISE POULTRY FOR MEAT? Chuck Schuster University of Maryland Extension Central Maryland

JUNIOR POULTRY DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT Also see Division 210, Poultry and Poultry Science Exhibits

THE POULTRY ENTERPRISE ON KANSAS FARMS

EC1421 Judging Six Common Varieties of Chickens

2015 Iowa State Poultry Judging CDE Written Exam Version A 1. What is the name of the portion of the digestive system that secretes hydrochloric acid

Avian Reproductive System Female

Production Basics How Do I Raise Poultry for Eggs?

FFA Poultry Career Development Event 2004 NEO Aggie Day. 1. With regard to egg storage, which of the following statements is FALSE?

DEPARTMENT 7 JUNIOR CLASS POULTRY

Help! My Chickens are Molting

Body Weight and Egg Production Performance of Induced Moulted White Leghorn Layers*

DAM (1929) as reported by Cheney

INHERITANCE OF BODY WEIGHT IN DOMESTIC FOWL. Single Comb White Leghorn breeds of fowl and in their hybrids.

MSMR Enrichment Symposium, 15 April 2010 MSMR Enrichment Symposium, 15 April 2010

- AWARD SPONSORS WILL BE POSTED AT THE FAIR

IT HAS been well established that

Veterinary Science Preparatory Training for the Veterinary Assistant. Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS

NORFA: The Norwegian-Egyptian project for improving local breeds of laying hens in Egypt

CHICKENS: 5 OR MORE YEARS

Text: Elly Vogelaar Photos: Aviculture Europe

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Assorted Guinea Brown egg layers: Black Sex Link Golden Sex Link Red Sex Link

PROJECT EASE Effective and Affordable Secondary Education

LI B RAR.Y OF THE U N IVER.SITY OF 1LLI NOIS

Madison County Fair Broiler Showmanship Study Questions

(Hemorrhagic Septicemia of Fowls) By ROBERT GRAHAM. A Brief Statement of the Cause, Symp" toms, Lesions, and Preventive Measures

FFA Poultry Career Development Event 2000 Poultry Judging Contest Arkansas State FFA Judging Contest

The Dog Cancer Diet By Demian Dressler

By: Martin Timmerman (NL)

1T& R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS' G30.7. UGb. cop AGRICULTURE

Physical Characteristics of Animals. Intact Males More muscle Larger in stature Grow faster than females Extra muscle in the neck area

An Overview of the Arkell Poultry Research Station. OMAFRA U of G Partnership Agreement

Deb Deb. days! as soon. as you. you want and. Frey s. help finding. and more. advantage. (the more you. sure to take. deal! ) and please ask if you

THE INFLUENCE OF SOME FACTORS ON THE HATCHABILITY OF THE HEN S EGG

THE production of turkey hatching

GROWTH OF LAMBS IN A SEMI-ARID REGION AS INFLUENCED BY DISTANCE WALKED TO WATER

The Chick Hatchery Industry in Indiana

Sand and Sage Round-Up MARKET CHICKEN STUDY GUIDE Junior and Intermediate Division (8-13 years of age as of December 31)

SUMMARY OF THESIS. Chapter VIII "The place of research, its purpose, the biological material and method"

4-H Poultry: Unit 1. The Egg Flock For an egg-producing flock, select one of these birds: production-type Rhode Island Red Leghorn hybrids sex-link

Rhode Island Red. Egg Laying: Excellent (around 5 per week) Egg Color: Brown. Red

OBJECTIVE: Students work as a class to graph, and make predictions using chicken weight data.

Answers & Low Prices Down Every Aisle SM. Choosing a Choosing a

PIMA COUNTY 4-H/FFA DEPARTMENT M POULTRY

Pullet or Cockerel? How to Know

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Artificial Light for Activating Males and Females to Higher Fertility*

SECTION 45 Standard Poultry

Effects of Three Lighting Programs During Grow on the Performance of Commercial Egg Laying Varieties

Leg and Foot Disorders in Domestic Fowl

A simple linebreeding program for poultry breeders

EC1481 Revised with no date The Flock Owner's Part in Pullorum Eradication

Animal Care & Selection

Feeding the Commercial Egg-Type Replacement Pullet 1

CARING FOR YOUR CHICKEN

THE GROWTH OF CHICKENS IN CONFINEMENT.

Sexing Day-Old Chicks on Small and Backyard Flocks

Effects of Three Lighting Programs During Grow on the Performance of Commercial Egg Laying Varieties

OPEN BREEDING POULTRY SHOW

Northwest Livestock Expo 2018 POULTRY STUDY GUIDE

EDUCATION AND PRODUCTION. Layer Performance of Four Strains of Leghorn Pullets Subjected to Various Rearing Programs

Procedure Number: AH Cage Cards 007 Revision Number: 3 Effective Date: May 2013 Expiration Date: November Purpose

Small Animal Shows. July 8, 13 & 14, Johnson County 4-H & FFA. University of Missouri Extension

STATE FFA POULTRY EVALUATION KNOWLEDGE TEST

SMALL ANIMAL AUCTION

DIVISION 17 POULTRY CLELL AGLER FEED DONATED BY REITERMAN'S FEED & SUPPLY PURINA MILLS SUNFRESH RECIPE POULTRY PRODUCTS

Neutering Rabbits. Ness Exotic Wellness Center 1007 Maple Ave Lisle, IL

Successful rearing for a good production in laying period

The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy's Guide to Rare Breeds of Chickens

DIVISION 17 POULTRY CLELL AGLER FEED DONATED BY REITERMAN'S FEED & SUPPLY PURINA MILLS SUNFRESH RECIPE POULTRY PRODUCTS

POULTRY DEPARTMENT 09 Monroe County Fair Open Poultry Show Friday August 4 th, 2017 at 12:30pm

July, 1924 Circular No. 286 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE AND EXPERIMENT STATION URBANA, ILLINOIS. Fowl Cholera

Economic Significance of Fasciola Hepatica Infestation of Beef Cattle a Definition Study based on Field Trial and Grazier Questionnaire

Transcription:

THE AVAILABILITY OF YOUNG CHICKS FOR TUMOR TRANSPLANTATION KANEMATSU SUGIURA (From thp Huntington Fund for Cancer Research, Memorial Hospital, and the Harrirnan Research Laboratory, the Roosevelt Hospital, New York) The discovery of a transplantable chicken sarcoma in 1910 by Rous (1) and Fuzinami and Inamoto () has resulted in the use of large numbers of chickens for experimental and routine tumor transplantation. A recent report of Gye (3) upon the etiology of cancer, has revived interest in the sarcoma of fowls and has stimulated the use of chickens in several fields of cancer research (-10). It is generally agreed that tumor susceptibility varies among hens. The variable rate of growt3h of inoculated tumor tissue in hens and the occasional failure of these tumors to proliferate when transplanted, has been an annoying hindrance to progress in this type of tumor research. A suitable and reliable soil for tumor growth is desirable. Transplantation experiments with the mammalian tumors indicate that young animals are more suitable for successful inoculation than old animals. On account of this, it was thought of value to investigate the degree of adaptability of young chicks in tumor transplantation. Should the tumor show a dependable growth in young chicks the expense of investigation with chicken sarcoma might be greatly reduced. EXPERIMENTAL P.RT In the present study we used Barred Plymouth Rock chicks, whose ages varied from one to thirty days at the time of the primary tumor transplantation. The chicks, generally 1 in number were kept in wire cages, 1 X 1 x 1 inches. The floor of each cage was covered with sawdust. The room in which these cages were kept was well ventilated, lighted and maintained at a moderate and equable 8 1

8 KANEMATSU SUGIURA temperature. The initial diet consisted of Conkey's starting feed with occasional feedings of sweet milk. Later the chicks were given lettuce and grains supplemented by broken charcoal, and granite. They had constant access to fresh tap water. A number of growth curves of normal chicks andl of tumorbearing chicks are shown in Fig. 1. FIG. 1. COMPARIRON OF (:ROWTI< IN BODY WICIGHT OF FORMAL (1) ANI) OF TUMOR-BEARINU (, 3 AND ) HARRED PLYMOPTH ROCK CHICKS FROM A DAY AFTER HATCHING. At the poiiit marked by the :mr(iw ( ) the experimental chicks were inocriltited with Roiis chicken sarcoma. The crosses indicate the time of death. It will be noted that with the continued growth of the tumor, the body weight of an inoculated chick increases slowly until its death, but its rate of growth is not so rapid as that of the normal chick. Throughout the experiments we used fresh growth of Rous chicken sarcoma No. 1. The growth of the first generation was obtained from a desiccated and pulverized tumor tissue which was kindly furnished by Dr. I'eyton Rous of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Tumor tissue weighing about milligrams was selected from a slightly hemorrhagic area of a tumor two weeks old, and was inoculated into the pectoral muscles of the chicks by a small trocar, the diameter of which was approximately 1. mm. Observations upon the normal implantations are presented in

YOUNG CHICKS FOR TUMOR TRANSPLANTATION 83 Table I. The data are arranged according to the ages of the chicks into which the pieces of tumor tissue were inoculated. - Experiment No. 1........ 3................ 7.... 8.... 9.... 10... 11... 1.... 13.... 1.... TABLE I Results oj Transplanting Rous Chicken Sarcoma in Young Chicks (Barred Plymouth Rocks) at Iliflerent Ages Number of Chick8 Urrd 8 7 8 - Ages of Chicks in Days wbcr Tumor Tissue was Inoculatec I 1 3 3 7 8 10 13 1 1 30 Tumor Tissue Used c - RCH 7c - RCH 1) - R C8 13 H B - 13 CS 11 XA RCS - 713 10' - R CS 3D 31) B R CS BC Percentage of Tumor Takes 0 7 We can see, from the results in Table I, that the age of the chicks does not affect the percentage of tumor takes, since in most experiments, perfect transplantation resulted. In spite of the small size and undeveloped pectoral muscles of these chicks the transplants grew rapidly, metastasized readily and killed the chicks quickly. Once this tumor was established

8 KANEMATSU SUGIURA and growing in chicks it never underwent spontaneous retrogression. Many of the chicks which were inoculated with the tumor tissue at an age of less than 8 days, died in about 1 days after this implantation. As these chicks grew ollder their powers of resistance increased. The sarcoma did not kill the 1 and 30 day old chicks before and 30 days respectively after tumor implantation. In this respect the behavior of older chicks is similar to that of young adult hens or pullets. Forty-two per cent of the autopsied chicks dying from the neoplastic disease, showed metastases in the lungs, :and 38 per cent showed petechial hemorrhages in the liver. Aside from these two immediate causes of death, the tumor affects the nutritional state of its host and apparently finally kills it by nutritional failure. In diminishing order of frequency, tumor metastases occurred in the lungs, liver, heart, kidneys, and spleen. Both male and female chicks were found equally susceptible to inoculation with the Rous chicken sarcoma. Among 71 chicks used in the normal transplantation experiments shown in Table I, 0 were males and 31 were females. The sarcoma grows relatively faster and metastasizes quicker in healthy growing chicks than in young adult, hens. In consequence, the tumor reaches a greater size in the hen than in the chick. It is of interest to compare the beh:tvior of the chicken sarcoma with that of malignant mammalian tumors; e.g., the Flexner-Jobling rat carcinoma and the Bashford mouse carcinoma 3 in suckling rats and mice respectively, grew progressively and almost equally in size with those in adult animals (11). The re-implantation with similar tumor tissue within a short time after the primary implantation did not affect the takes of both primary and secondary implants. This result differs somewhat from that obtained with mammalian neoplasms (1) indicating that different tumor parenchymata vary in their power of inducing resistance. Another point to be noted in this connection is that the

I ~ ~ ~ YOUNG CHICKS FOR TUMOR TRANSPLANTATION 8 tumor takes and their subsequent rate of growth in hens were irregular. There were instances where tumor development in hens required a period of three weeks in order to reach a measurable size. Young chicks tolerated quite well the mechanical injuries which are involved in the tumor inoculation, and very seldom died as a result of the trauma. On account of their small size and high susceptibility to Rous chicken sarcoma they may be used to advantage in many experiments. TRANSPLANTATION OF ROUS CHICKEN SARCOMA IN CHICKS OF DIFFERENT BREEDS In connection with the present study we determined the degree of inoculability of Rous chicken sarcoma in breeds of chicks other than the Plymouth Rock in which the original tumor occurred. TABLE I1 Results of Transplanting Rous Chickan Sarcoma in Young Chicks of Digrrent Breeds Experiment No. l...... 3...............,._ 7... 8..,.. 9... Kind of Rrrcds White JTyandottes White Wy an do t tes IJlack Jersey Giants Black.Jersey Giants White Leghorns White Leghorns Rhode Island Reds Rhode Island Reds Rhode Island Reds Number If Chicks Used 3 Agrs of Chirk, in h.vs when Tumoi Tissue \\as Inoculated 1s 1 Tumor Tissue LTscd - Itcs KCS 9n XA 9B RCS 9U 10A 'errentage if Tumor Takes I00

8 KANEMATSU SUGIURA The tumor tissues used in these experiments were selected from tumors which have been passed through several Barred Plymouth Rock chicks. The data obtained from these experiments are given in Table 11. The above results clearly show that the Rous chicken sarcoma grows well in the different breeds of fowls commonly seen on American farms. The frequency and the site of metastatic deposits in these chicks were similar to those found in the Barred Plymouth Rock chicks. However, the rate of tumor growth in White Wyandottes was somewhat slower than was found in other breeds. SUMMARY The susceptibility of young chicks (one to 30 da,ys old) to Rous chicken sarcoma No. 1 was studied under laboratory conditions. It was found that the Barred Plymouth Rocks, White Wyandottes, Black Jersey Giants, White Leghorns, and Rhode Island Reds were equally susceptible to the tumor growth. Re-inoculation within short periods did not affect the normal growth of the first or second implants. The small size of young chicks, the ease in caring for large numbers of them, the low cost and upkeep as compared with hens, and their high and uniform susceptibility to Rous chicken sarcoma are factors to be considered in using them for experimental tumor studies. REFEltENCES 1. lloua, P.: J. Exp. Med., 1910, xii, 9.. FUZINAMI, A,, AND INAMOTO, K.: Gann, 1911, v, 10. 3. GYE, W. E.: IAuncet, 19, ccix, 109.. MURPHY, J. U.: J. A. M. A., 19, Ixxxvi, 170.. MUELLBR, J. H.: Proc. Soc. Exp. I3iol. and Med., 19, xxiii, 70.. FLU, P. C.: C. It. Sac. Bid., Paris, 19, xcix, 131. 7. HARDE, E.: J. Tropical Med. and Hygiene, 193, xxix, 19. 8. HARKINS, M. J., SCHAMBIGRG, J. F., AND KOLMER, J. A,: J. Cancer Res., 19, x,. 9. CUTLER, M.: J. Cancer Res., 19, x, 9. 10. NAKAHARA, w.: Gunn, 19, XX, 108. 11. SUGIURA, I<.: J. Cancer Res., 19, viii, 37. 1. SUGIURA, I<., ANU UENEDICT, 8. R.: J. Cancer Res., 19, x, 1%