Poll: Should Pennsylvania have an anti-tethering dog law?

Similar documents
ORDINANCE ANTI-TETHERING OR CHAINING ORDINANCE

ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO ANIMALS. Proposed City Council Ordinance: Sec.

1 SB By Senator Waggoner. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 12-MAY-15. Page 0

SUMMARY Authorizes a local government to establish a program for the managed care of

REPORT ON LEGISLATION BY THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO ANIMALS 1

Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

LEGISLATURE

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator JEFF VAN DREW District 1 (Atlantic, Cape May and Cumberland)

MEMORANDUM. June 10 th, To: Members of Common Council. From: Belinda Lewis, Director Animal Care and Control

Your best friend s best chance to make it home safely is to be properly licensed.

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

1998 Enacted And Vetoed Legislation

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

Article 25. WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS,

2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90

Animal Rights IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR INSIDE. Municipal Laws Provincial Laws Criminal Law Questions and Answers Adoption and Rescue Centres

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

Adoption Contract. I, (print name) (also referred to herein as Client ) residing at. Cell Phone #: Home Phone #:

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

Position statements. Updated May, 2013

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

An individual may request an emotional support animal as an accommodation in a campus residential facility if:

ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO NOT ENDORSE BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION

Department of Code Compliance

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

CHAPTER 189. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the existing ordinances regulating dogs is inadequate and in need of substantial revision,

The Humane Society of Somerset County

TOWNSHIP OF WATERFORD COUNTY OF CAMDEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Nevada Public Safety Department

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

Character Education CITIZENSHIP

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

Animal Cruelty, Dangerous Dogs, Registration and Rabies Control Act of 2008

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE


CURRENT TEXAS ANIMAL LAWS

ORDINANCE # AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE IV, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, CHAPTER VIII, ANIMAL CONTROL

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

Missouri Revised Statutes

Chapter 4. ANIMALS * ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL

January Re Proposed Amendments to Chapter 10 of the City Code Tethering of Dogs

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

Pet Preparedness Packet. A How-To Guide

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF BERKELEY COUNTY WEST VIRGINIA MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF DOGS AND CERTAIN OTHER ANIMALS

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

Demi s Animal Rescue Foster Agreement (Dog)

ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

SB1576 Animal Welfare Building Lost Pet Reunion Programs that Adhere to F.S.S Presented by FAAWO

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. MISTREATMENT OF ANIMALS

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON CRIME PREVENTION, CORRECTIONS & SAFETY FINAL ANALYSIS

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOG *

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

9. DOGS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION OR RABID CONFINEMENT.

WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF GOLDEN BYLAW NUMBER WHEREAS the Council of the Town of Golden deems it desirous to regulate the keeping, care and licensing of animals;

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

Referred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area

POLICY. Number: Animals on Campus Responsible Office: Administrative Services I. PURPOSE & INTENT

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

2015 RESOLUTION NO. R Official Resolution of the Board of Commissioners Macomb County, Michigan

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

Ordinance for the Control of Dogs

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

Eskie Rescuers United American Eskimo Dog Rescue, Inc (A 501c3 Non-profit Organization) Adoption Agreement. ERU Rescue ID:

ORDINANCE NO RESOLUTION NO APPROVING A DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE Chisago County, Minnesota

BYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.

Dangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents

Kokomo, IN Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 90: ANIMALS

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

CHAPTER 505 City of Willoughby Hills: Animals and Fowl

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CFA Federal and State Bill Tracking as of 03/19/2018

Orange County Animal Services 501 W. Franklin St, Suite 106, Chapel Hill, NC (919)

Title 8 ANIMALS. Chapter: 8-1 Cruelty to Dumb Animals. 8-2 Regulate the Keeping of Dogs. 8-3 Keeping of Livestock

Transcription:

Page I of Poll: Should Pennsylvania have an anti-tethering dog law? POSTED 11:25 AM. OCTOBER II, 2016. BY JANA BENSCOTER. UPDATED Armsz.4s4, OCTOBER74 2076.tlt. According to Pennsylvania Sen. Richard Alloway, tethering dogs is cruel and inhumane. Tethering is defined as fastening a dog to a stationary object or stake in order to keep the animal under control, It does not refer to a dog being walked on a leash. Dogs are highly social pack animals who thrive on human and animal interaction and companionship, he wrote in a legislative note. To a dog, being constantly tethered is like solitary confinement is to a human being. An otherwise friendly dog, when kept tethered becomes unhappy, anxious, and often aggressive and develops neurotic behaviors such as incessant barking, digging and chewing. Alloway noted over 120 cities, counties and towns in over 30 states have legislation prohibiting or restricting the perpetual tethering of dogs and more are quickly following suit. California and Texas have state-wide laws restricting the tethering of dogs for no more than three hours a day, he wrote. Many other states currently have anti-tethering bills pending in their legislature. Legislation introduced in the Pennsylvania General Assembly would provide for a summary offense if a person violates tethering provisions, second and subsequent offenses shall be a misdemeanor of the third degree. Should Pennsylvania have an antitethering dog law? Poll: Should Peninylvanla have an anti. Wthrtng dog law? yea No Other Vie., Results Polld.ddy.com

Ii,t WPMTFOX43 aboui2months ago Poll: Should Pennsylvania have an anti-tethering dog law? htlp //wa 1ox43 cam/4xlkl rtt 4± ;fra 4ri._e_. - - r / Page 2 of) Jr - RESULTS 512 cce5 Yes 65% No 29% Other 6% 29 35 2 WPMT F0X43 L Fallow h.4 @faa4d Poll Should Pennsylvania have an anli-telhering dog law? viafox43 com/4xlkl 11 30 AM - 44% Yes 51% No 5% Other Od 2015 43 vo:es Final results

Page I Home About Us 2016 Candidate Survey Take Action Events Stay Informed Humane PA I m iihii/t CiflhiI i I.,Iifwtil I riwcjor Art incus Legislation Endorsements Resources Donate You are here Home Current Legislation Affecting Animals ii Fact Sheets About Pending Bills 2015 End 24/7 Tethering of Dogs in Pennsylvania End 24/7 Tethering of Dogs in Pennsylvania Search Q Take action to help pass SB 373 Senator Richard Alloway + 18 Co sponsors introduced SB 373, which overwhelmingly passed the Senate 45-4 Now it needs to pass the House, Please call, write, e-mail, Or use social media to contact your State Reoresentat:ve to request their supped of SB 373. Your message can be short, stating simply I am a constituent please support SB 373, the inclement weatherlantt-tethering bill - Thinking about the dogs left outside today? Help them by taking action Please follow up by making a call to Representative Ron Marsico. Chairman of the Judidary Committee, to ask him to move SB 373 from his committee: Rep Marsico (717) 783-2014 or rmarsicopahousegop.com SB 373 will C a - Ensure tiat a dog is remcved fron, the tefler in per:ods of incemer.t weather Prov de m r.mum stanoards to- tengtn and type of teller - Ban the use of poke p;nch or prengea collars wb;ch pose a danger fc the dog wi-lie tethered Ensure that be dog may only be tethered long enougn for Inc owner to complete a temporary task and Inat the owner may not leave the dog unatterded and tetnered Facts about tethering: What does chaining or tethering of dogs mean? These terms te er to the practice of fastenng a sog to a statjsnary object or stake usuaty in tne owner s backyard as a means ci keeo.ng the an:rr.al under control These errs do not refer to the periods v-ten an an:mal :5 walkes on a leash. Why is tethering dogs inhumane? Dogs are naturally social animals who thrive on interaction with people and other animals A dog kept chained in one spot for hours days. months Dr even years suffers Immense psychological damage An otherwise friendly and docile dog, when kept continuously chained becomes neurotic, unhappy anxious and often aggressive In many cases, the necks of chained dogs become raw and covered with sores, the result of improperly fitted collars and the dogs constant yanking and straining to escape confinement Dogs have even been found with collars embedded in their necks, the result 0f years of neglect at the end of a cta.n In addition to The ASPCA. The Humane Society of the United States and numerous animal experts, even the U. S Department of Agriculture issued a statement in the July 2. 1996, Federal Register against tethering Our expenence in enforcing the Animal Welfare Act has led us to conclude that continuous confinement of dogs by a tether is inhumane A tether significantly restricts a dog s movement A tether can also become tangled around or hooked on the dog s shelter structure or other objects, further restricting the dog s movement and potentially causing injury What effects does tethering have on the community? Banning permanent tethering makes for safer neighborhoods and happier dogs all without adding burden to our animal control agency The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports chained dogs are three times more likely to bite

on G. Page 2 of resulting in greater incidences of dog attacks and bites to humans and animals The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) also concluded in a study that the dogs most llkely to attack are male. un-neutered, and chained Find your State Legislators More artlolesllnformatian on tethering: Pa bills would outlaw dog tethering, revenge pet cruelty Tethering its Last Thread? Table of Stale Tethering Laws Township Tethering Ordinance (sample language) Philly Dawg York Co borough approves landmark anti-tethering law Philly Dawg HarrLsburg Poised lobe the f:rst PA City with anti-tethering law Share this: fi Facebook OK- V Twitter. [*ij fl 2 bloggers like this Googte Emaifl 9 Pinterestj pi int [c.1reddil 12/1/2016

ur1ington KEEP WARM FOR LESS 0 SHOP BURLINGTON STORES & save65:4 OTHER RETAILERS PRICES EVERY DAY Page 1 ofa Pa. bills would outlaw dog tethering, revenge pet cruelty By Myles Snyder (http://abc27.com/author/mylessnyder-2/) Published: April 20, 2015, 12:55 pm HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) - Tethering dogs outdoors for long periods of time could result in animal cruelty charges under legislation introduced Monday by two Pennsylvania senators. Senate Bill 373 would make tethering a dog to a stationary object illegal unless the dog needed to be temporarily restrained.

Page 2 of3. The dog would have to be monitored periodically, have a non-choking collar and a tangle-free tether at least 10 feet long, and have access to food, water, shade and shelter. Dogs could be tethered no more than 30 minutes if the temperature is less than 32 or above 90 degrees. Violators would face a summary charge of animal cruelty for their first offense. Second and subsequent offenses would be a third-degree misdemeanor punishable by a fine of at least $200. The bill is among seven in a legislative package to help prevent animal cruelty. Senators Rich Alloway (R-Adams/Cumberland/Franklinflork) and Andy Dinniman (D-Chester) said the bills unveiled Monday would ensure fewer animals are subjected to mistreatment and inhumane living conditions. Another measure, Senate Bill 78, would not allow kennel licenses to be issued to someone if an immediate family member had a kennel license revoked within the last 10 years. The new licensee would have to show their family member would have no role in the care of the dogs. Under Senate Bill 373, a court could award up to $12,000 in civil penalties against someone who caused the unlawful or intentional harm or death of a pet and up to $5,000 in certain cases where a pet s death is deemed negngent. People who hurt or kill a pet to get back at an estranged spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend or partner would face increased penalties if they have a protection from abuse order against them. Senate Bill 594 would raise the fine from a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of $10,000 to at least $2,000 and up to $1 5,000. Another proposal, Senate Bill 640, would allow people to have therapy dogs on public transportation. Service dogs, trained to help people with disabilities, are already allowed on public transportation. a JJ!LL Top News Thousands of notes spread positivity at Elizabethtown... Wednesday was the first day of a wave of positivity at Elizabethtown...

Page I of2 Daily Local News (litt:/jwvw.dailvlocal.com) Pa. Senate passes pet protection package Four bills are approved that will tighten animal cruelty laws By StaffReport Wednesday, June 3,2015 The Pennsylvania Senate overwhelmingly passed a package of four bipartisan bills to tighten animal cruelty laws and better protect pets and animals, according to an announcement by Sen. Andy Dinniman on Wednesday. Sen. Richard Alloway Ill and I have been working together on legislation to improve the treatment of pets and pet animals in Pennsylvania for a number of years, Dinniman said. The passage of these bills marks a major step forward in that process. We clearly understand the way we treat our pets and animals is a clear reflection of our own humanity and how we treat each other. I hope our colleagues in the House vili agree and send these bills to the governor s desk to be signed into law. The bills are as followed: Senate Bill 594, sponsored by Dinniman, calls for increasing the penalty when animal abuse occurs in a domestic violence situation. This legislation unanimously passed the Senate. Senate Bill 78, sponsored by Alloway, prevents serious dog law violators from operating a kennel under a family member s name. It ensures that if a license for a kennel owner has been revoked in the last 10 years, no new kennel license shall be issued to an immediate family member of the convicted person seeking to operate a kennel at the same location. This legislation unanimously passed the Senate. Senate Bill 294, sponsored by Sen. John Eichelberger, improves the clarity and uniformity of animal cruelty laws as they apply to horses. It ensures that equine animals are covered by current animal cruelty laws and improves the definitions of the crimes. In addition, it calls for the development of standards and procedures in determining violations and the necessary probable cause to support seizure of animals. This legislation unanimously passed the Senate. Senate Bill 373, sponsored by Alloway, outlaws the prolonged tethering of an unattended dog outdoors. It prohibits dogs from being tethering in unsafe situations, such as weather emergencies or under circumstances that deprive them of food, water and shelter. The bill also includes minimum shelter standards for dogs, including provisions to protect animals from moisture, wind and extreme temperatures. This legislation passed the Senate by a vote of 454. Diniman said he was especially proud to see his Senate Bill 594 progress, as he has been working to pass this legislation for some time. All too often, an estranged spouse, boyfriend or girlfriend will get back at their spouse or partner by hurting or killing their cat, dog or other pet. It isa method of inflicting emotional and psychological harm on another person and animals get caught in the crossfire, Dinniman said. Meanwhile, study

Page 2 of 2 after study has demonstrated the direct link between violence against animals and violence against people. it s time that we increased the penalty for such crimes. Dinniman also pointed out that these bills were pan of the Be Kind to Pets Rally that he and Alloway held at the state Capitol in honor of Adopt a Shelter Pet Week in April. Dinniman was joined at the rally by Jazz, a standard poodle he and his wife, Margo, recently rescued from near certain euthanization in a New York City shelter. Dinniman said Jan continues to recover well and has already brought immense love and joy to his family. In recent years we have taken some significant steps to improving the treatment of dogs, cats and pet animals in Pennsylvania. We ve continued to improve the Dog Law. We ve banned the gassing of shelter animals with Act 182 of 2012. And we continue to encourage shelter dog adoption and rescue efforts, Dinniman said. But we are not done. I want to thank everyone who was integral in that success and ask for your support in getting these bills through the House. URL biipthnnw.daliinc.lrnmigrneni.nnsfldi5p6p3/pa.,c.a:r.pa,,cs.pci.pnnctiinm.psrksgt 20J5 Daily Local News (http://www.dailvlocal.com)

Page 1 of 1 Pa. Senate panel approves Alloway s antitethering bill Posted: Tuesday, May 5,20156:00 pm HARRISBURG, Pa. The Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee approved legislation Tuesday that would prevent dogs from being housed or tethered in inhumane conditions, according to state Sen. Richard Alloway II, the bill s sponsor. Senate Bill 373 would prevent dogs from being tethered in unsafe situations, such as weather emergencies or under circumstances that deprive them of food, water and shelter. The bill also includes minimum shelter standards for dogs, including provisions to protect animals from moisture, wind and extreme temperatures. These requirements are unnecessary for the vast majority of Pennsylvanians because they already protect vulnerable animals as a matter of principle, but not everyone shares that view, said Alloway, R-Franklin/Adams/CumberlandlYork. Pets provide an amazing amount of love, devotion and companionship to their owners. We owe them the same kind of consideration. Senate Bill 373 was sent to the full Senate for consideration. The bill is part of a larger package of legislation announced last month to help prevent animal cruelty.