ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Similar documents
Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Influence of Experimentally- induced clinical mastitis on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

CLINICAL MASTITIS PERCEPTIONS OF KANSAS DAIRY PRODUCERS. J.R. Roberson 1

J. Dairy Sci. 90: doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

LOCAL TOLERANCE OF INTRAMAMMARY PREPARATIONS IN COWS

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

The world s first and only pour-on anti-inflammatory for cattle FAST PAIN RELIEF

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Comparative efficacy of DRAXXIN or Nuflor for the treatment of undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease in feeder cattle

Mastitis cows and immunization

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Dry Cow Vaccination. Maternity Pen. Timing. Colostrum Absorption. Failure of Passive Transfer

EXCEDE Sterile Suspension

On-Farm Antibiotic Testing

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Vaccination strategies for reducing clinical severity of coliform mastitis

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Milking behaviour in dairy cows naturally infected with clinical mastitis

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Mastitis in non-bovine dairy species, companion animals and breastfeeding mothers. Chris Knight

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

Luteolysis and Pregnancy Outcomes in Dairy Cows after Treatment with Estrumate or Lutalyse

Development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine against mastitis in dairy cows. II. Field trial

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Ninth Annual Fall Dairy Conference November 12-13, 2008 Liverpool, NY. Happy Cows in New York. Proceedings

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Key words: mastitis, dairy, fertility, animal reproduction

Caused by microorganisms (usually bacteria) that invade the udder, multiply, and produce toxins that are harmful to the mammary gland

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

= 0.5 mg. In vitro toxin neutralisation test based on haemolysis of sheep erythrocytes. For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

The use of on-farm culture systems for making treatment decisions

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

S. P. Oliver, R. A. Almeida, B. E. Gillespie, S. J. Ivey, H. Moorehead, P. Lunn, H. H. Dowlen, D. L. Johnson, and K. C. Lamar

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Reproductive Vaccination- Deciphering the MLV impact on fertility

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

MARBOCYL 10% SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

Vaccination Strategies for Mastitis

CEVA products for reproduction management

Innovation in Mastitis Treatment

, Pamela L. Ruegg

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

Actions and Outcomes of Wisconsin Dairy Farms Completing Milk Quality Teams

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Ren Tip # 84 11/6/15

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Lincomycin (as Lincomycin hydrochloride) Neomycin (as Neomycin sulphate) Excipients Disodium edetate

Do dairy cows with mastitis show signs of sickness behavior? - and why should we care? Mette S. Herskin

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

Bacterin Toxoid on Clinical Coliform Mastitis

Ubroseal Dry Cow 2.6 g intramammary suspension for cattle

Estimating the Cost of Disease in The Vital 90 TM Days

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Transcription:

GDR11136 ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis February 2012 Summary The challenge data presented in this technical bulletin was completed as part of a master seed requalification program conducted by Pfizer Animal Health. 1 The trial was designed to evaluate the physiological and microbiological changes and the duration of mastitis in cows challenged with Escherichia coli (E. coli ), which were either vaccinated with ENVIRACOR J-5 or a placebo. The duration of E. coli mastitis was 64 hours shorter in cows vaccinated with ENVIRACOR J-5 compared with placebo-vaccinated cows (P 0.05). Vaccinates had significantly lower E. coli viable counts for study periods 0 to 24 hours and 0 to 21 days post-challenge than placebo-vaccinated cows (P 0.05). Vaccinated cows experienced a significant reduction of E. coli shedding by approximately half compared with placebo-vaccinated control cows (P 0.04). Vaccinated cows experienced 13 times higher milk antibody titers prior to challenge compared with placebo-vaccinated control cows (P 0.05). Introduction Clinical mastitis due to environmental pathogens can be detrimental to dairy operations, causing fever, abnormal milk, lack of appetite, excessive udder edema, diarrhea, dehydration, dramatic drops in milk products and, in severe cases, death. It has been estimated that on average, clinical mastitis could cost as much as $378 per case, based on disease costs, including drug expenses for treatment, discarded milk, labor costs and losses attributable to premature culling. 2 When considering approaches to managing mastitis on the farm, a systems approach, including management practices, proper milking procedures and nutrition in addition to vaccination programs should be emphasized. While vaccination is not a substitute for proper management of mastitis, it should be a component of an overall plan to help reduce the risk of disease. Though there are several E. coli mastitis vaccines available, differences exist that should be considered when selecting

This trial used a challenge model developed by Pfizer Animal Health to demonstrate ENVIRACOR J-5 efficacy. Vaccinated and control cows were challenged with a heterologous strain of E. coli 21 +/- 7 days after calving. a vaccine for disease management. Extensive research has helped document the efficacy and safety of ENVIRACOR J-5 in cattle. The initial research performed by Dr. James S. Cullor at the University of California-Davis introduced ENVIRACOR J-5 as a new tool to combat mastitis with a favorable efficacy (72 percent less incidence of clinical coliform mastitis and less than 2 percent of affected cows having a repeat event) and safety profile (free endotoxin activity below 200 nanograms per dose with minimum adverse reactions in calves or pregnant cows). 3 Cullor s research validated previous efforts by Tyler, et al., that had identified ENVIRACOR J-5 as an effective vaccine based on its partially shared antigenic structure with Gram-negative mastitis pathogens, its ability to function as an immunogen inducing a humoral response, and the ability to help prevent infection and/or reduce the severity of clinical disease. 4 The safety profile of ENVIRACOR J-5 also has been confirmed in research via comparison of endotoxin units to other commercially available vaccines. 5,6 The use of ENVIRACOR J-5 has been a valuable component of mastitis control vaccination programs on dairy operations since its introduction in 1993. This technical bulletin outlines a mastitis challenge model that was used to evaluate the efficacy of an E. coli mastitis vaccine. Results are consistent with previous research, demonstrating higher specific serum antibody titers, shortened duration of E. coli mastitis infection and reduced shedding of E. coli (all, P<0.05). Materials and methods The study design involved healthy Holstein or Holstein-cross cows in their second, third or fourth lactation that were confirmed to be 193 ± 7 days pregnant and had four healthy quarters. Cows also were required to have a somatic cell count (SCC) 200,000, have negative quarter culture results and be serologically negative for bovine leukemia virus (BLV) or, if positive, have lymphocyte counts of <10,000/ μl. Cows were randomly assigned to two groups, with group T01-Control cows receiving saline (placebo) injections and group T02 cows vaccinated with ENVIRACOR J-5, per label directions. The 5.0 ml doses of placebo or bacterin were administered subcutaneously on alternating sides of the neck. Challenge occurred at 21 ± 7 days after calving. Cows were moved from a commercial dairy to the study facility 12 days before challenge to allow for acclimation. They were milked twice daily from arrival until the end of the challenge phase. On the day of challenge, after evening milking, 55 cows were challenged with a heterologous strain of E. coli in the left-front quarter. Forty-five cows met the inclusion criteria and were retained in the final analysis data set (25 in T01-Control group and 20 in T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 group). Efficacy was evaluated based on clinical signs and quantitative milk culture and quality variables associated with mastitis (see Table 1). Udder structure assessed the presence or absence of mammary disease evidenced by heat, pain or redness. Milk bovine serum albumin (BSA) served as an internal measure of vascular or cellular damage consistent with mastitis. Onset of clinical E. coli mastitis was defined as at least one abnormal udder structure and one abnormal milk quality variable and a positive E. coli milk culture in the challenged quarter. The cow was considered to have continuing E. coli mastitis if she had at least one abnormal udder structure and one abnormal milk quality, and/or a positive E. coli milk culture in the challenged quarter. Clinical signs associated with mastitis (rectal temperature, attitude, milk appearance and udder evaluation) were observed and recorded for all cows at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 23 hours (± 15 minutes) and then twice daily, at each milking on Days 2 to 21 post-challenge. Total milk yield, total milk conductivity and cow activity also were monitored at each milking. In addition to clinical observations, milk samples were collected at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 23 hours (± 15 minutes) and then twice daily through 14 days post-challenge, and daily during morning 2

Table 1. Variables that defined clinical mastitis Variable Normal Abnormal Milk conductivity <15% increase from baseline 15% increase from baseline Udder evaluation score 0 1 Milk appearance score 0 1 Milk somatic cell count* <200,000 cells/ml 200,000 cells/ml Milk bovine serum albumin** <0.30 mg/ml 0.30 mg/ml Challenge quarter culture status for E. coli Negative Positive *Somatic cell count ranges derived from the National Mastitis Council, Udder Topics, December 1997, and from the Escherichia coli Mastitis Seminar, Nov. 15, 2007, Richland, Mich. **Milk bovine serum albumin values derived from Pfizer Animal Health study reports and technical notes and concentrations of glucocorticoids, bovine serum albumin, and somatic cells in mastitic milk. J Dairy Sci 1981;64(11):2258-2261. Eleven cows calved later and nine calved earlier than allowed for inclusion in the challenge phase of the study. Five cows were removed after BLV testing and eight for mastitis unrelated to the challenge. Six cows were excluded for other health-related reasons not associated with vaccination or challenge. More than 70 percent of the T01-Control group cows had E. coli mastitis with onset occurring through 24 hours post-challenge, so the challenge model was considered valid. All included cows (100 percent) developed E. coli mastitis (see Table 2). There were no signficant adverse events except for some mild injectionmilking only on Days 15 through 21 postchallenge. These laboratory samples were used to perform quantitative E. coli culture, milk BSA and SCC assays. Blood samples for serum also were collected 3 and 7 days post-challenge to determine ENVIRACOR J-5 specific antibody titers. To confirm cows continued to meet inclusion criteria, quarter milk samples were collected from each cow at 14 and 21 days post-challenge for microbiological evaluation and a composite of the three nonchallenged quarters for SCC determinations. Blood samples also were collected from each cow at 21 days post-challenge to screen for BLV titers and lymphocyte count to confirm continued inclusion in the study. Data summaries and analyses were performed by using a centralized data management system (SAS/STAT, version 9.1 or higher, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Data were analyzed by using a mixed model or a categorical procedure, with the cow as the experimental unit and a 5 percent level of significance (P 0.05). The control claim was based on two related but distinct clinical progressions following challenge: 1) severity or magnitude of physiological changes resulting from the challenge and 2) the duration of mastitis (from challenge until 21 days post-challenge). Results 3

Duration of E. coli mastitis was 64 hours shorter (more than 2.5 days) in vaccinated cows. (P<0.05) Figure 1. Duration of E. coli mastitis 200 150 41% reduction Hours 100 50 0 T01-Control T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 LSM duration of E. coli mastitis Table 2. Onset and duration of E. coli mastitis Treatment Animals with E. coli mastitis, % Time to positive culture, hours Onset of E. coli mastitis, hours LSM duration of E. coli mastitis, hours (95% CI) T01-Control (n=25) 100 3-6 9-15 156.02 a (97.30-214.74) T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 (n=20) 100 3-6 6-15 92.00 b (72.17-111.83) a,b Values with different superscripts within each column are significantly different (P 0.05). site swellings that resolved before the next treatment and were consistent with bacterin administration. Abnormal challenge quarter milk appearance and clinical status were tracked and reported in regard to the onset and duration of E. coli mastitis in both groups. Twenty-four of 25 T01-Control cows and 19 of 20 T02- ENVIRACOR J-5 cows had milk samples positive for E. coli at 3 hours post-challenge; the remaining cows, one each in the T01- Control and T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 groups, were positive at 6 hours post-challenge. The onset of E. coli mastitis occurred at 9 hours post-challenge for eight of 25 cows, at 12 hours for 16 cows, and 15 hours for one cow in the T01-Control group. The onset of E. coli mastitis occurred at 6 hours post-challenge for one cow, at 9 hours for six cows, at 12 hours for 11 animals, and at 15 hours for two cows in the T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 group. Duration of E. coli mastitis for the acute phase (0 to 24 hours post-challenge) was 16.84 hours for T01- Control cows and 16.90 for T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 cows and was not significantly different (P=0.92). Duration of E. coli mastitis for Days 0 to 21 post-challenge was 156.02 hours for T01-Control cows and 92 hours for T02- ENVIRACOR J-5 cows and was significantly different. Thus, the duration of E. coli mastitis was 41 percent shorter in vaccinated cows. These results are consistent with previous trials that have demonstrated shorter duration of intramammary E. coli infection for cows vaccinated with ENVIRACOR J-5. 7,8 The 4

stratified mitigated fraction estimate for duration was 19.9 and the 95 percent CI was 12.7 to 31.3. The lower 95 percent CI was above zero, confirming that the duration of E. coli mastitis was mitigated in vaccinates compared with controls. There was no significant overall treatment effect for milk BSA, SCC or conductivity, so no comparisons were made of these variables (see Table 3). However, the overall mean challenged quarter E. coli milk viable count was significantly lower (P 0.05) in vaccinated cows compared with controls (see Figure 2, Page 6). Mean milk E. coli viable count results (CFU/ ml) for 0 to 24 hours, 2 to 7 days, 8 to 21 days and 0 to 21 days were 2,426 for T01-Control and 1,104 for T02-ENVIRACOR J-5, 5 for T01-Control and 3 for T02-ENVIRACOR J-5, 0 for T01-Control and 0 for T02-ENVIRACOR J-5, and 8 for T01-Control and 5 for T02- ENVIRACOR J-5, respectively. Vaccinates had significantly lower E. coli culture counts (P 0.05) for study periods 0 to 24 hours and 0 to 21 days post-challenge. Antibody titers in serum and milk appear in Figure 3 and Figure 4 (Page 6). Overall mean serum and milk total IgG whole cell ELISA antibody titers were significantly higher (P 0.05) in vaccinated cows compared with controls. Mean serum total IgG whole cell ELISA antibody titers results for the first milk post-calving were 14,486.4 for the control group and 197,982.1 for vaccinates. Discussion The challenge was effective, eliciting E. coli mastitis in all cows. However, the ENVIRACOR J-5 bacterin stimulated significantly higher total IgG antibody titers in milk and serum in vaccinated vs. placebo-vaccinated cows (P 0.05). Clinical progression in E. coli mastitis and the duration of mastitis were both reduced in vaccinates compared with controls. Vaccinated Table 3. Udder and milk variables in challenged quarters, least squares means (95% confidence intervals) Treatment 0 to 24 Hours 2 to 7 Days 8 to 21 Days 0 to 21 Days Milk bovine serum albumin (mg/ml) T01: Control 0.98 (0.92-1.04) 0.42 (0.37-0.47) 0.09 (0.05-0.14) 0.36 (0.32-0.40) T02: ENVIRACOR J-5 1.01 (0.93-1.09) 0.45 (0.39-0.51) 0.10 (0.05-0.15) 0.38 (0.34-0.43) Somatic cell count (cells/ml) T01: Control 847,473 (647,669-1,108,915) 2,663,626 (2,097,153-3,383,112) 180,247 (143,584-226,273) 536,247 (429,117-670,122) T02: ENVIRACOR J-5 1,115,922 (853,428-1,459,154) 3,143,565 (2,444,336-4,042,817) 184,521 (144,761-235,202) 601,111 (473,528-763,069) Milk conductivity (mmho) T01: Control 11.1 (10.7-11.5) 9.9 (9.6-10.1) 9.4 (9.2-9.7) 9.6 (9.4-9.9) T02: ENVIRACOR J-5 10.8 (10.3-11.2) 9.6 (9.4-9.9) 9.2 (9.0-9.5) 9.4 (9.2-9.7) 5

Figure 2. Challenge quarter E. coli viable counts 24 hours post-challenge (CFU/mL) 30,000 E. coli count CFU/mL 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 T01-Control T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 5,000 0 3 hours 6 hours 9 hours 12 hours 15 hours 18 hours 21 hours 24 hours Hours post-challenge Figure 3. Antibody titers in serum-elisa IgG titers 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 Figure 4. Antibody titers in milk 225,000 200,000 175,000 150,000 125,000 13X Higher Titers 15,000 100,000 10,000 5,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 0 Pre-1st vac Pre-2nd vac Pre-3rd vac Prechall 7 days post-chall 0 Milk titers pre-challenge T01-Control T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 T01-Control T02-ENVIRACOR J-5 6

cows resumed normal production 64 hours earlier than control cows, and the return to production can be expected to translate into more salable milk. Vaccinated cows also shed less potentially infective E. coli bacteria than their placebo-vaccinated counterparts, which could help in control of this environmental pathogen. These new data built on more than 20 years of experience with ENVIRACOR J-5. Conclusions ENVIRACOR J-5 was introduced in 1993 and is supported by an extensive body of research that has helped document the safety and efficacy for use in cattle. The challenge study discussed in this technical bulletin represents an E. coli mastitis challenge model utilized to evaluate the efficacy of an E. coli bacterin and was designed to evaluate the physiological changes and the duration of mastitis in cows vaccinated with ENVIRACOR J-5 compared with placebovaccinated cows. Results demonstrate that E. coli-vaccinated cows have a shorter duration of E. coli mastitis, lower E. coli viable counts and higher antibody titers in milk and serum compared with placebo-vaccinated cows. The challenge data presented in this technical bulletin supports the use of ENVIRACOR J-5 vaccine as an integral component of an overall mastitis management program. Vaccinated cows shed significantly less (P<0.05) E. coli into the environment during the 3 weeks postchallenge than placebovaccinated cows. Differences exist and must be considered by producers or veterinarians using or recommending an E. coli bacterin. 7

References 1 Data on file, Study Report No. 3931-60-08-562, Pfizer Inc. 2 DeGraves FJ, Fetrow J. Partial budget analysis of vaccinating dairy cattle against coliform mastitis with an Escherichia coli J5 vaccine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199(4):451-5. 3 Cullor JS. The Escherichia coli J5 vaccine: Investigating a new tool to combat coliform mastitis. Vet Med 1991;86(8):836-844. 4 Tyler JW, Cullor JS, Osburn BI, Bushnell RB, Fenwick BW. Relationship between serologic recognition of Escherichia coli 0111:B4 (J5) and clinical coliform mastitis in cattle. Am J Vet Res 1988;49(11):1950-1954. 5 Cullor JS. J5 Escherichia coli: A core antigen vaccine for coliform matitis. 1993 Coliform Mastitis Symposium: 1993;30-35. 6 Data on file, Study Report No. 0709-115, Pfizer Inc. 7 Hogan JS, Weiss WP, Smith KL, Todhunter DA, Schoenberger PS, Sordillo LM. Effects of an Escherichia coli J5 vaccine on mild clinical coliform mastitis. J Dairy Sci 1995;78(2):285-290. 8 Hogan JS, Bogacz VL, Aslam M, Smith KL. Efficacy of an Escherichia coli J5 bacterin administered to primigravid heifers. J Dairy Sci 1999;82:939-943. ENVIRACOR is a trademark of Pfizer Inc. 2012 Pfizer Inc. All rights reserved. GDR11136-R 8