Brucellosis. Received for publication 9 January in bovine brucellosis studies. The specific objectives

Similar documents
Sera from 2,500 animals from three different groups were analysed:

Radial Immunodiffusion Test with a Brucella Polysaccharide Antigen for Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Cattle

and other serological tests in experimentally infected cattle

An ELISA for the evaluation of gamma interferon. production in cattle vaccinated with Brucella abortus

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

EUROPEAN REFERENCE LABORATORY (EU-RL) FOR BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS WORK-PROGRAMME PROPOSAL Version 2 VISAVET. Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Classificatie: intern

Epidemiology - Animal Tracing Exercise. Gregory Ramos DVM, MPVM Area Epidemiology Officer USDA/APHIS/VS

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Revaccination with a reduced dose of Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccine of breeding cows in the Pampas region of Argentina

SENSITIVE AND -RESISTANT TUBERCLE BACILLI IN LIQUID MEDIUM SENSITIVITY TESTS

Surveillance of animal brucellosis

Cattle Serologically Positive for Brucella abortus Have Antibodies

Article 3 This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS: TRIAL IN LATIN AMERICA

Agriculture And Industries Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRIES ANIMAL INDUSTRY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Ch. 7 BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 7. BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS

Characterization of Brucella abortus Soluble Antigen

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diseases of Concern: BVD and Trichomoniasis. Robert Mortimer, DVM Russell Daly, DVM Colorado State University South Dakota State University

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS

Surveillance of Brucella Antibodies in Camels of the Eastern Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

FELINE CORONAVIRUS (FCoV) [FIP] ANTIBODY TEST KIT

Patrick D. Karns Research Biologist Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744

NIAA Resolutions Bovine Committee

Vaccine. Diagnostic and Vaccine Chapter. J.H. Wolfram a,, S.K. Kokanov b, O.A. Verkhovsky c. article info abstract

INFECTIOUS HEPATITIS, PARVOVIRUS & DISTEMPER

National Bovine TB Eradication Program Update. Dr. Burke Healey Director Cattle Health Center

Bovine Brucellosis Control of indirect ELISA kits

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Antibody Test Kit for Feline Calici, Herpes and Panleukopenia Viruses (2011)

Control And Preventive Study Of Brucellosis By Using Lipopolysacharide Sub Unit Vaccine Brucella abortus Strain S-19

The Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act

Comparison of Clindamycin, Erythromycin, and Methicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

DISEASE DETECTION OF BRUCELLOSIS IN GOAT POPULATION IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA. Abstract

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11):

Gye and Cramer (1919) found that the ionizable salts of calcium injected together with the washed spores of Cl. tetani or of certain

Wisconsin Bovine TB Update

Reproductive Vaccination- Deciphering the MLV impact on fertility

Risk assessment of the re-emergence of bovine brucellosis/tuberculosis

Immunological Response of Awassi Sheep to Conjunctival Vaccination against Brucellosis Disease in Mount Lebanon

Improving consumer protection against zoonotic diseases Phase II Project No: EuropeAid/133990/C/SER/AL

Brucellosis of Cattle' (Bang's Disease)

BIOLACTAM. Product Description. An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity

HEALTH REGULATIONS RELATED TO ANIMALS ADMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN HOLSTEIN CHAMPIONSHIP IN COLMAR, FRANCE, FROM 14 TO 19 JUNE 2016

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Clostridial Vaccination Efficacy on Stimulating and Maintaining an Immune Response in Beef Cows and Calves 1,2

Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Bovine Antibody to Brucella abortus

Procedures for the Taking of Prevention and Eradication Measures of Brucellosis in Bovine Animals

Received 27 November 1995/Returned for modification 14 March 1996/Accepted 8 April 1996

Cercetări bacteriologice, epidemiologice şi serologice în bruceloza ovină ABSTRACT

Improved Susceptibility Disk Assay Method Employing an

Use of Cattle Movement Data and Epidemiological Modeling to Improve Bovine Tuberculosis Risk-based Surveillance

Hemolysis Test for Cattle Vaccinated and Infected with

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

BRUCELLOSIS. Morning report 7/11/05 Andy Bomback

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overview and Expectations

Practical Biosecurity and Biocontainment on the Ranch. Dale Grotelueschen, DVM, MS Great Plains Veterinary Educational Center Clay Center, NE

Guideline for Prevention of Brucellosis in Meat Packing Plant Workers

Simple Herd Level BVDV Eradication for Dairy

A rapid test for evaluating B. melitensis infection prevalence in an Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) reservoir in the French Alps

EXCEDE Sterile Suspension

TREATMENT OF ANOESTRUS IN DAIRY CATTLE R. W. HEWETSON*

Prevalence of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Young, Purebred Beef Bulls for Sale in Kansas

Country Report Malaysia. Norazura A. Hamid Department of Veterinary Services, Malaysia

Evaluation of combined vaccines against bovine brucellosis

A SEROLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ON ADULT CATTLE VACCINATED WITH BRUCELLA ABORTUS STRAIN 19

Procedures for the Taking of Preventive and Eradication Measures of Brucellosis for Swine

Title. Author(s)WANG, Chun-Tshen. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 39(2-4): 10. Issue Date DOI. Doc URL.

The Effect of Enzyme Treatments on Brucella abortus Cell Walls

11/4/2016. Overview. History of Brucellosis. History of US Brucellosis program

Recent Topics of Brucellosis

Disease Outbreak Investigation Protocol: Brucellosis Case Study MONOGRAPH

CANINE BRUCELLOSIS IN FLORIDA: SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF POUND DOGS, ANIMAL SHELTER WORKERS AND VETERINARIANS

OIE Reference Laboratory Reports Activities

DOWNLOAD OR READ : VIRAL DISEASES OF CATTLE 2ND EDITION PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Enzootic Bovine Leukosis: Milk Screening and Verification ELISA: VF-P02210 & VF-P02220

TECHNICAL BULLETIN Claude Toudic Broiler Specialist June 2006

by adding different antibiotics to sera containing

Dr. Kenneth E. Anderson Poultry Science Department North Carolina State University Box 7608 Raleigh, NC

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

Association between Brucella melitensis DNA and Brucella spp. antibodies

loopfull is removed from each dilution and transferred to capable of killing the test organism in 10 minutes but not GERMICIDAL SUBSTANCES

Brucellosis Eradication and Control. II. Minnesota

Salmonella. Serological. Salmonella. food poisoning. Use of pasteurized milk and milk products Improvement of hygiene. Proper storage of foods

The Use of Homologous Antigen in the Serological Diagnosis of Brucellosis Caused by Brucella melitensis

The use of different Brucella vaccines for protection against Brucella melitensis infection in cattle.

ZOONOSES MONITORING. Luxembourg IN 2014 TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Effeet on Bacterial Growth

Johne s Disease and its Impact on Red Meat Production

Diurnal variation in microfilaremia in cats experimentally infected with larvae of

Klett-Summerson photoelectric colorimeter. The presence of the glucose RESISTANCE AND SYNERGISM IN STREPTOMYCIN

2018 NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW (NWSS) HEALTH REQUIREMENTS

STEPHEN N. WHITE, PH.D.,

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

UW College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Global Perspectives Grant Program Project Report

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 1978, p. 55-557 95-1137/78/7-55$2./ Copyright 1978 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 7, No. 6 Printed in U.S.A. Whole-Blood Lymphocyte Stimulation Assay for Measurement of Cell-Mediated Immune Responses in Bovine Brucellosis JOHN M. KANEENE,* ROBERT K. ANDERSON, DONALD W. JOHNSON, CHARLES C. MUSCOPLAT, PAUL NICOLETTI, ROBERT D. ANGUS, DONALD E. PIETZ, AND DIANE J. KLAUSNER Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota 5518*; U.S. Department ofagriculture, Gainesville, Florida 3268; and Veterinary Services Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa 51 Received for publication 9 January 1978 A study was conducted to develop an in vitro whole-blood lymphocyte stimulation assay for measurement of cell-mediated immune response in bovine brucellosis. A soluble antigen () prepared from killed cells of Brucella abortus 1119-3 was used. Cattle infected with B. abortus field strains, B. abortus 19 calfhood- and adult-vaccinated cattle, and nonexposed cattle were tested. Blood was diluted 1-fold in RPMI-164 medium (without added serum) and cultured with (at a concentration of 2.2,Lg per culture) at varying times of incubation. Results were assayed for [3H]thymidine incorporation into deoxyribonucleic acid. A 6-day period was found to be optimal for incubating blood cultures to achieve maximum specific lymphocyte stimulation. Serological tests and bacteriological isolation attempts were conducted simultaneously with lymphocyte stimulation tests, and there was a significant correlation between cellmediated immune response and bacteriological findings. There was a significant correlation between cell-mediated immune response and the level of serum antibodies on a group basis, but there was little correlation between the two systems on individual infected animals. Among vaccinated animals there was little or no correlation between cell-mediated immune and humoral responses. The whole-blood assay was found to be simple, fast, sensitive, and reproducible. In vitro lymphocyte transformation using purified lymphocytes is gaining wide acceptance in the scientific community as a test for lymphocyte immune function, and it is applied in studies of immune responsiveness, delayed hypersensitivity, histocompatibility, and clinical allergy (2-4). Recently, studies have focused on the usefulness of lymphocyte stimulation in vitro as a diagnostic tool in infectious diseases, particularly those diseases where delayed hypersensitivity is an important component (3-6, 1, 12, 17, 18, 22). In our laboratory, studies of brucellosis have focused on developing a suitable antigen that could be used in studies of in vitro lymphocyte stimulation. A suitable antigen, Brucella abortus soluble antigen (), its protein and endotoxin content, and the kinetics of utilizing that antigen for in vitro purified lymphocyte stimulation have been reported (8). This antigen was utilized in later studies on bovine brucellosis (9) Ṫhe drawback of in vitro lymphocyte stimulation using pure lymphocytes is the limited number of cultures obtained from the small volumes of blood normally available; also, the time ruired to purify lymphocytes from peripheral blood is considerable, especially when testing large numbers of animals, as can be the case in herd testing. Several lymphocyte transformation studies using whole blood (nonseparated) rather than lymphocyte-enriched preparations have been reported (2, 13-15). With the present program of eradication of bovine and swine brucellosis, large numbers of animals must be tested. A simplified in vitro lymphocyte stimulation test could prove very useful, especially in herd problems where serological diagnosis is questionable. The purpose of this study was to develop a whole-blood lymphocyte stimulation assay that could be used in bovine brucellosis studies. The specific objectives were: (i) to find the optimal period of incubating blood cultures; (ii) to correlate lymphocyte culture findings with serological results; (iii) to compare lymphocyte stimulation results 55 Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest

VOL. 7, 1978 in lymphocytes from animals with different exposure experiences to B. abortus; and (iv) to correlate lymphocyte stimulation results with infection (infection being used here to mean animals from which brucellae were isolated). MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals and bleeding schedule. Dairy cattle were used, and information on the types and status of each animal is given (Tables 1 and 2). Animal no. 33, the whole of group 2 except no. 22, and the whole of group 4 were kept in Florida and were from one herd. Blood from these animals was collected and sent to the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, by air mail and received and tested the following morning. This was a single blind study, since the status of the animals from which samples were collected was not known by the technical staff at Minnesota. The remaining animals were kept at the College of Veterinary Medicine in St. Paul, Minn. The infected cattle (no. 21, 51, and 74) were kept in separate isolation units. The vaccinated (group 3) and control cattle (group 5) were kept in a brucella-free herd belonging to the Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, and remained clinically normal throughout the study. The same day the animals in Florida were bled, those at St. Paul were also bled, and blood was kept at room temperature and tested the next morning together with the samples from TABLE 1. Types and status of dairy cattle used Ani- Group mal Age ~~Vaccinal status' B. abortus culture resulteb no. 1 21 Adult NV Field strain + 33 Adult AdV Field strain + 51 Adult NV Field strain + 74 Adult NV Field strain + 2 22 Adult CV Strain 19 + 38 Adult AdV Strain 19 + 337 Adult AdV Strain 19 + 438 Adult AdV Strain 19 + 561 Adult AdV Strain 19 + 611 Adult AdV Strain 19 + 3 87 Heifer CV NA 91 Heifer CV NA 92 Heifer CV NA 4 324 Adult AdV - 334 Adult AdV - 45 Adult AdV - 654 Adult AdV - 5 518 Calf NV NA 581 Calf NV NA 987 Calf NV NA 988 Calf NV NA a NV, Not vaccinated; AdV, adult vaccinated; CV, calfhood vaccinated. +, Positive; -, negative; NA, not applicable. WHOLE-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTE STIMULATION ASSAY 551 Florida. The study was conducted in two parts: the first part, conducted on 6 October 1976, was to find the optimal period of incubating blood samples, and the second part, conducted on 13 January 1977, was to use the optimal period of incubating blood cultures to test objectives (ii) through (iv). Collection of blood. Approximately 3 ml of blood was collected by jugular venipuncture from each animal. A 2-ml portion of each blood sample was placed into a sterile tube containing heparin (5 U/ml; The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich.). The remaining 1 ml was placed into tubes and allowed to clot, and serum was collected for later use in the several serological tests (Table 2). Each time heparinized blood was received in the laboratory at St. Paul, it was subjected to the following procedures. Preparation of cultures. The heparinized blood was diluted 1-fold using RPMI-164 culture medium (Grand Island Biological Co., Grand Island, N.Y.) containing penicillin (1 U/ml), streptomycin (1 Ag/ml), and L-glutamine (2 mm). No other supplements were added. Culture medium, mitogen, and antigen. Tissue culture medium was RPMI-164. Concanavalin A (ConA; Miles-Yeda, Rehovot, Israel) at a concentration of 1. jig per culture was used. (8) was used at a concentration of 2.2 jig of protein per culture. Cell cultures. After blood dilutions were made, blood from each animal (1 pd per culture) was added in triplicate to wells of a microtitration culture plate by using an automatic dispenser. ConA and were added to the appropriate wells. As negative controls, triplicate wells for each animal were set up with lymphocyte suspension, but neither ConA nor was added. All cultures were set up at the same time and incubated for varied periods of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days, and all were incubated at 37 C in an incubator with a 5% CO2 humidified air atmosphere. Approximately 16 to 18 h before termination,.5 tlci of [methyl-3h]thymidine (6. Ci/mmol; Schwarz/Mann, Orangeburg, N.Y.) was added to each well. Processing of cultures was performed by the method of Hartzman et al. (7), and radioactivity was counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Serological tests. The standard serum tube agglutination test, card test, Rivinol test, and compliment fixation test were conducted on sera from test animals according to U.S. Department of Agriculture procedures (19, 2) and interpretations (21). Brucella culture attempts. Isolation of brucellae from milk and tissues was conducted according to the methods recommended by Alton et al. (1). B. abortus field strains were isolated repeatedly from the milk of cows in group 1 and from their tissues after slaughter. B. abortus 19 was isolated repeatedly from the milk of cows in group 2. Attempts to isolate Brucella from the milk of cows in group 3 were unsuccessful. RESULTS Expression oflymphocyte stimulation results. Results of lymphocyte stimulation are expressed in two ways. (i) Acpm. Difference in counts per minute (Acpm) is expressed as mean cpm of triplicate Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest

552 KANEENE ET AL. Z4Z9: *... * zz z + ++ ++ r- r- J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. u I Cz. Al.. 'I t1. OD 46 4 B a -a C.) cis co. CD cq + + > - 8qD IX Nq 4 C88 8 88 8 q + _ -4P414 + + 8 ++s ed e (A o o o oo v4 v 4 v14 4 P P 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 S LLe. e o e cn 4v v) 4 b7 Z: F G tovs8 bebez ~~~~~~~~~1 C u,: 8 U-. uo Dek I+ I+ I+e +q +q+q + + + 4 z z2 zz z + C) e. I- Q -I ul 8 8 8 8 8 8 bd 8 88 LO tka L + +q + +q+++ N8 4 + + z +z+ - 4 4 r 88 88 8 888 8 CO +14 +4 + + + CZ.<!. e UU<U U Zci ZZ /C/C21 Zc_ ZZ > o :> > = O e1 D. ZcLoZZ _1 co _ co_ = ~,o w t- 1 '~171 11 ~17 ecq ee C ecq _-4 r- _ -4 - N VD Lo t- ce c' eto - CI Ut CD ull ++++ = co w co 4D~ um u: e 4qe ci9 m t- P-4gcl A sg (4 zz: blo ca ra M 4 to.. tka ID tn 4) 4) 4) Is Z I:L4 A4 44 CL, Z P.. Z Z ;.P CZ t."vt.^ 3 Cq o r 4Z.c zzzz < tzzz < z < Xz -4 t. -n 2E > co11 o ~z *u^ Al eo_ 4 I :3I r 4 1 rj ej r _ tq I, _) tp U ri Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest.

VOL. 7, 1978 cultures without either ConA or subtracted from mean cpm of triplicate cultures with ConA or. (ii) SI. Stimulation index (SI) is expressed as mean cpm of triplicate cultures with ConA or divided by mean cpm of triplicate cultures without either ConA or. Results of lymphocyte cultures. Results of part 1 of the study (to find optimal incubation WHOLE-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTE STIMULATION ASSAY 553 period of blood cultures) are shown (Fig. 1). SI greater than or ual to 3. was considered indicative of infection. The data from the first part of the study revealed that: (i) a 6-day incubation period was optimal for culturing blood to achieve highest specific blastogenesis in lymphocytes from brucella-infected cattle; (ii) lymphocytes from animals in groups 1 and 2 had positive responses throughout; (iii) except on day 3, *@--- *Infected (fie d -- - St-19 Infected 1.CO-- St-19 Calfhood 16 _'_4 Sti19 Adult Vc 14 _ *- - Control 12 1 8 x c6 X~~ 6 - *5 4 Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest 3 4 5 6 7 Doys of Incubation FIG. 1. Determination of optimal time period of incubating whole blood to achieve maximum specific lymphocyte transformation with. Blood was from B. abortus field strain-infected cattle (-*); B. abortus 19 shedders ( - ), B. abortus calfhood-vaccinated, nonshedders (-); B. abortus 19 adultvaccinated cattle (nonshedders) (*- -); and brucella nonexposed control cattle (----). Bars represent one standard error of the means. SI of-3 = positive (infection), shown by arrow (-*); SI of sl = negative response (not infected).

554 KANEENE ET AL. group 1 had a significantly higher response than group 2 (P <.5); groups 3 and 4 were basically the same, except on day 3 when group 4 reacted above the positive (infection) mark; and (iv) there was no specific lymphocyte stimulation (SI = 1 or less) induced by in lymphocytes from control animals. Serological tests results. The serological tests on cattle in 5 groups are shown in Table 2. Group 3 had the highest serum agglutination antibody titers, followed by group 1, whereas group 4 had the lowest, followed by group 2. On a group basis, the level of serum agglutination - x 4) c - *-c -W E tn 3P 25F 2F 15 F 1F 5F 3+ 8B abortus Infected -Field Strain J B obortus St-1s Infected E] B abortus Stl19 Ca!fhood 'Vc (Non-infected' B Oborto Adult Vac (Non-infected) 2 Control t 1-.1.L S - 1 2 3 4 5 1 Groups titers did not correlate with specific lymphocyte stimulation response (LSR). From the second part of the study (Fig. 2 and 3 and Table 3), the following findings could be stated: (i) on a group basis, lymphocytes from group 1 animals underwent a significantly higher specific LSR than those from group 2 (P <.5); (ii) lymphocytes from group 2 animals underwent a significantly higher specific LSR than those from groups 3 and 4 (P <.1); and (iii) no LSR was elicited by in lymphocytes from control animals. Results of serological tests (Table 2) show that on a group basis the L 2 3 4 5 35 3 25 2 Cc 15. a c 1 CA E L 4) 5 D I FIG. 2. Comparison of lymphocyte stimulation results elicited by in lymphocytes from cattle of different B. abortus exposure experience and nonexposed control animals with the serum tube agglutination test on an animal group basis. Lymphocytes were incubated for 6 days. Bars represent 1 standard error of the mean. SI of -3 = positive response (infection), represented by arrow (-*); SI of sl = negative response (not infected). AL. S J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest

VOL. 7, 1978 tn x *1 * I 35 3 25 2 _ 15 _ 11_ 5 _ 3-I x x e abortu Infected (field stroin) * e abotu St -19 Infected o R obhctu St- 19 Colftood Voc (non-int) e abortus St- 19 Adult Voc (non-ntf) A Control ~ 1 2 3 4 5 Groups FIG. 3. Comparison of specific lymphocyte stimulation, on a single-animal basis, elicited by in lymphocytes from animals with different B. abortus exposure experience and from control animals. Lymphocytes were incubated for 6 days. Bars indicate mean values for each group of animals, and each mark represents SI of a single aninal. SI of 23 = positive response (infection), represented by arrow (--); SI of -l = negative response (not infected). level of antibody titers went down in all groups, except in group 1, where the titers remained the same. Correlation between serological response and lymphocyte stimulation test. On a group basis, there was good correlation between antibody levels and LSR results in both groups 1 and 2; both reached infection level. In group 3 there was no correlation (Fig. 2) between the two systems. There was correlation between groups 4 and 5 between antibody titers and LSR (Fig. 2). On an individual basis, there was little correlation between level of antibody titer and LSR. Animals no. 21 and 38, for example, had the highest LSR in groups 1 and 2, respectively, but their titers were not the highest. Similarly, animals no. 74 and 438 of groups 1 and 2 had the highest antibody titers, but their specific LSR was the lowest for their respective groups. A similar trend was observed in animals of groups 3 and 4. Correlation between lymphocyte stimulation and bacterial culture. Considering an --5 WHOLE-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTE STIMULATION ASSAY 555 * a A Il SI for indication of infection as 3 or greater, all animals in groups 1 and 2 were called infected by LSR test. B. abortus was isolated from all those animals. Thus, there was 1% correlation between LSR and recovery of B. abortus. DISCUSSION The data generated in this study indicate that the whole-blood lymphocyte culture procedure TABLE 3. Lymphocyte stinulation induced by ConA and in lymphocytes from cattle of different B. abortus exposure experience and in control animalsa Group Anl Treat- Acpm SIb no. ment 1 21 ConA 51 ConA 74 ConA 2 22 ConA 38 ConA 337 ConA 438 ConA 611 ConA 3 87 ConA 91 ConA 91 ConA 4 324 ConA 334 ConA 45 ConA 654 ConA 5 518 ConA 987 ConA 988 ConA 934,787 1,845 69,473 9,74 732,911 9,973 912,331 3,774 74,775 4,296 85,933 1,889 1,919 1,269 87,44 2,27 75,859 936 121,193 1,149 89,74 1,168 96,144 1,23 73,51 337 17,996 1,48 51,129 756 12,169 447 934,173 912 811,33 471 563.4 33.8 97.6 25.4 17.3 21.4 39.3 6.9 466.2 13.4 24.1 4.5 27.6 3.4 344. 9. 23.5.9 234.9 1.3 98.4 2. 61.5.8 17.3.5 44.8.4 97.9.9 12..2 96.8.6 12.3.9 'Group 1, B. abortus field strain-infected cattle; group 2, B. abortus 19 shedder cattle; group 3, B. abortus calfhood-vaccinated cattle; group 4, B. abortus adult-vaccinated nonshedder cattle; group 5, control animals. b SI: 23, positive response; l1, negative response. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest

556 KANEENE ET AL. can be adapted to study cell-mediated immunity in bovine brucellosis. The observation that animals infected with B. abortus field strains (group 1) had a significantly higher cell-mediated immune response than cattle with B. abortus 19 infection (group 2) may be due to a difference in virulence. B. abortus 19 is a far less virulent organism than the field strain. It is, therefore, possible that the field strain multiplies and sensitizes a large proportion of lymphocytes. The difference in cell-mediated immune response in these groups of animals could have very important diagnostic value. The general lack of correlation between the cell-mediated immune response of calfhood-vaccinated animals (group 3) and the level of antibody titers agrees with our earlier studies in bovine brucellosis (9) where pure lymphocytes were used. The high level of correlation between infection and cell-mediated immune response in this study shows promise in brucellosis diagnosis. The results of this study clearly indicate that this method has numerous advantages over more conventional techniques. In our experience, we found it simple, sensitive, fast, and reproducible. In the experiment reported here, there was no additional serum supplement added to the RPMI-164 culture medium (serum supplements are needed when using purified lymphocytes). Additionally, the results demonstrate that there is no need to remove erythrocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, platelets, or residual autologous plasma to obtain a significant mitogenic or antigen-induced blastogenesis. The use of nonseparated blood thus retains blood cells, especially monocytes, in natural proportions, allowing maximum enhancement of immune response through cell cooperation. The whole-blood lymphocyte culture procedure eliminates many of the steps involved in cell separation, thus avoiding many possible sources of technical errors, and it ruires only small volumes of blood. Large numbers of samples can be set up, which could offer some savings in effort and real costs. With programs for the eradication of brucellosis in cattle and swine, large numbers of animals must be tested, and many of them cannot be properly identified serologically without bacterial culturing. A simplified test like the one described here could be a valuable aid in these programs. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Ellen E. Sloane and David R. Senogles for their technical assistance. This research was supported by grants from the University of Minnesota Experiment Station and Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. LITERATURE CiTED 1. Alton, G. G., L. M. Jones, and D. E. Pietz. 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis, 2nd ed., p. 11-59. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2. Ayivor, M. D., C. C. Muscoplat, A. W. Chen, P. M. Rakich, C.. Thoen, and D. W. Johnson. 1976. Whole blood lymphocyte stimulation for diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle, p. 351-359. 19th Annual Proc. Am. Assoc. of Vet. Lab. Diag. 3. Bascoul, S., M. Peraldi, A. L. Marine, and C. Lacave. 1976. Stimulating activity of brucella fractions in a human lymphocyte transformation test. Immnunology 31:717-722. 4. Chaparas, S. D., S. R. Hedrick, R. G. Clark, and R. German. 197. Comparison of the lymphocyte transformation test with the tuberculin test in rhesus monkeys and chimpanzees. Am. J. Vet. Res. 31:1437-1441. 5. Daguillard, F. 1972. Immunologic significance of in vitro lymphocyte responses. Med. Clin. North Am. 56:293-33. 6. Daniel, T. M., and C. F. Hinz, Jr. 1974. Reactivity of purified proteins and polysaccharides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in delayed skin test and cultured lymphocyte mitogenesis assays. Infect. Immun. 9:44-47. 7. Hartman, R. J., M. L Bach, and F. H. Bach. 1972. Precipitation of radioactivity labeled samples: a semiautomatic multiple-sample processor. Cell. Immunol. 4:182-186. 8. Kaneene, J. M., D. W. Johnson, R. K. Anderson, R. D. Angus, D. E. Pietz, and C. C. Muscoplat. 1978. Kinetics of in vitro bovine lymphocyte immunostimulation with a Brucella abortus antigen. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:235-239. 9. Kaneene, J. M., D. W. Johnson, R. K. Anderson, R. D. Angus, D. E. Pietz, and C. C. Muscoplat. 1978. Specific lymphocyte stimulation in cattle naturally infected with strains of Brucella abortus and cattle vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain 19. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:585-589. 1. Miller, S. D., and H. E. Jones. 1973. Correlation of lymphocyte transformation with tuberculin skin-test sensitivity. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 17:53-538. 11. Mills, J. A. 196. The immunologic significance of antigen induced lymphocyte transformation in vitro. J. Immunol. 97:239-247. 12. Muscoplat, C. C., C.. Thoen, R. M. McLaughlin, J. R. Thoening, A. W. Chen, and D. W. Johnson. 1975. Comparison of lymphocyte stimulation and tuberculin skin reactivity in Mycobacterium bovis infected Macaca mulatta. Am. J. Vet. Res. 36:699-71. 13. Paty, D. W., and D. Hughes. 1972. Lymphocyte transformation using whole blood cultures: an analysis of the responses. J. Immunol. Methods 2:99-114. 14. Pauly, J. L., J. E. Sokal, and T. Han. 1972. A simplified technique for in vitro studies of lymphocyte reactivity. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 14:4-44. 15. Pauly, J. L., J. E. Sokal, and T. Han. 1973. Wholeblood culture technique for functional studies of lymphocyte reactivity to mitogens, antigens and homologous lymphocytes. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 82:5-512. 16. Rocklin, R. E., F. S. Rosen, and J. R. David. 197. In vitro lymphocyte responses of patients with immunologic deficiency diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 282:134-1343. 17. Rosenberg, G. L., P. A. Farber, and A. L Notkins. 1972. In vitro stimulation of sensitized lymphocytes by herpes simplex virus and vaccinia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69:756-76. 18. Swiderska, H., T. Osuch, and W. J. Brzoska. 1971. Peripheral blood lymphocyte blast transformation test as applied for the diagnosis of brucellosis. Exp. Med. Microbiol. 23:133-138. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest

VOL. 7, 1978 WHOLE-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTE STIMULATION ASSAY 557 19. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Standard agglutination test procedures for the diagnosis of brucellosis. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Animal Disease Laboratory, Diagnostic Reagents Manual 65D. 2. U.S. Departmment of Agriculture. Supplemental test procedures for the diagnosis of brucellosis. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Animal Disease Laboratory, Diagnostic Reagents Manual 65E. 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1977. Brucellosis eradication. Recommended uniform methods and rules, p. 5. APHIS, 911. 22. Wyler, D. T., and J. J. Oppenhein. 1974. Lymphocyte transformation in human Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J. Immunol. 113:449-454. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on August 17, 218 by guest