Risk Factors for Persistent MRSA Colonization in Children with Multiple Intensive Care Unit Admissions

Similar documents
FM - Male, 38YO. MRSA nasal swab (+) Due to positive MRSA nasal swab test, patient will be continued on Vancomycin 1500mg IV q12 for MRSA treatment...

Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Evaluating the Role of MRSA Nasal Swabs

Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Success for a MRSA Reduction Program: Role of Surveillance and Testing

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swabs as a Tool in Antimicrobial Stewardship

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

MDRO in LTCF: Forming Networks to Control the Problem

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections Activity C: ELC Prevention Collaboratives

Surveillance cultures: Can they help our decisions

Surveillance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms

Exploring the Role of Antibiotics on VRE Colonization and Infection

Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile Infection. Jocelyn Srigley, MD, FRCPC November 1, 2012

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia differ depending on the control group chosen

Follow this and additional works at:

Duration of Contact Precautions for Acute-Care Settings

Screening programmes for Hospital Acquired Infections

4/3/2017 CLINICAL PEARLS: UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

Impact of a Standardized Protocol to Address Outbreak of Methicillin-resistant

Infection Control Manual Residential Care Part 3 Infection Control Standards IC7: 0100 Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2017

original article infection control and hospital epidemiology october 2009, vol. 30, no. 10

Changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in paediatric intensive-care units

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2016

New Antibiotics for MRSA

Approval Signature: Original signed by Dr. Michel Tetreault Date of Approval: July Review Date: July 2017

Healthcare-associated infections surveillance report

Horizontal vs Vertical Infection Control Strategies

Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update

11/22/2016. Antimicrobial Stewardship Update Disclosures. Outline. No conflicts of interest to disclose

Challenges and opportunities for rapidly advancing reporting and improving inpatient antibiotic use in the U.S.

Eradiaction of Resistant Organisms:

Antibiotic usage in nosocomial infections in hospitals. Dr. Birgit Ross Hospital Hygiene University Hospital Essen

Antimicrobial stewardship in managing septic patients

Executive Summary: A Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use: Benchmarking and Patterns of Use to Support Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts

Lack of Change in Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Pediatric Hospital Despite Marked Changes in Antibiotic Utilization

Lindsay E. Nicolle University of Manitoba Winnipeg, CANADA

Rapid molecular testing to detect Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures improves patient management. Martin McHugh Clinical Scientist

Responders as percent of overall members in each category: Practice: Adult 490 (49% of 1009 members) 57 (54% of 106 members)

MRSA Control : Belgian policy

Collecting and Interpreting Stewardship Data: Breakout Session

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL

Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)

MODELING THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION PREVENTION STRATEGIES. Rachel Rubin Bailey. B.S., Tulane University, 2007

Community-Associated C. difficile Infection: Think Outside the Hospital. Maria Bye, MPH Epidemiologist May 1, 2018

Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use Prevalence Survey

MRSA in the United Kingdom status quo and future developments

8/17/2016 ABOUT US REDUCTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE THROUGH THE USE OF AN ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM

Nosocomial Infections: What Are the Unmet Needs

Staphylococcus Aureus

Antibiotic stewardship in long term care

Targeted MRSA Surveillance and its Potential Use to Guide Empiric Antibiotic Therapy

Epidemiology of early-onset bloodstream infection and implications for treatment

3/1/2016. Antibiotics --When Less is More. Most Urgent Threats. Serious Threats

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Institutional and Patient Level Predictors of Multi-Drug Resistant Healthcare- Associated Infections. Monika Pogorzelska

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

Best Practices for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. October 25, :00 AM 5:00 PM New Orleans, LA Room:

Detection and Quantitation of the Etiologic Agents of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Endotracheal Tube Aspirates From Patients in Iran

Why should we care about multi-resistant bacteria? Clinical impact and

Objectives 4/26/2017. Co-Investigators Sadie Giuliani, PharmD, BCPS Claude Tonnerre, MD Jayme Hartzell, PharmD, MS, BCPS

UPDATE ON ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP REGULATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AMS PROGRAM

Le infezioni di cute e tessuti molli

A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF COMMUNITY-ASSOCIATED METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS COLONIZATION IN COLLEGE SPORTS PARTICIPANTS

Strategies to Prevent Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Acute Care Hospitals

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital,

Reducing nosocomial infections and improving rational use of antibiotics in children in Indonesia

North West Neonatal Operational Delivery Network Working together to provide the highest standard of care for babies and families

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

Hospital Acquired Infections in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance

A Prospective Investigation of Nasal Mupirocin, Hexachlorophene Body Wash, and Systemic

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

Antibiotic Stewardship in the Hospital Setting

Appropriate Antibiotic Administration in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia

Hosted by Dr. Jon Otter, Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, King s College, London A Webber Training Teleclass 1

The importance of infection control in the era of multi drug resistance

JMSCR Vol. 03 Issue 06 Page June 2015

Healthcare-associated infections surveillance report

Study Protocol. Funding: German Center for Infection Research (TTU-HAARBI, Research Clinical Unit)

Preventing Surgical Site Infections. Edward L. Goodman, MD September 16, 2013

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report March 2015

Surgical prophylaxis for Gram +ve & Gram ve infection

Predictors of the Diagnosis and Antibiotic Prescribing to Patients Presenting with Acute Respiratory Infections

IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF A GUIDELINE-BASED TREATMENT ALGORITHM FOR COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA (CAP)

Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: A systematic review and meta analysis

Infection Control Priorities for Antibiotics Resistance - The Search and Destroy Strategy. WH Seto Hong Kong China

The Impact of meca Gene Testing and Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Intervention on the Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for ACCEPTED

Replaces:04/14/16. Formulated: 1997 SKIN AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTION

MDRO: Prevention in 7 Steps. Jeanette Harris MS, MSM, MT(ASCP), CIC MultiCare Health System Tacoma, Wa.

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL. Enterococcal Species

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL. Antibiotic Resistance

MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. Has the post antibiotic era arrived? Dr. Michael A. Borg Infection Control Dept Mater Dei Hospital Malta

NASAL COLONIZATION WITH STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN BASRA MEDICAL AND DENTISTRY STUDENTS

Acinetobacter baumannii is prevalent among critically ill

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Dissecting the epidemiology of resistant Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenters

MAJOR ARTICLE. Impact of MRSA Surveillance on Bacteremia CID 2006:43 (15 October) 971

Empiric antimicrobial use in the treatment of dialysis related infections in RIPAS Hospital

Transcription:

University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Nicholas G Reich July, 2013 Risk Factors for Persistent MRSA Colonization in Children with Multiple Intensive Care Unit Admissions Victor O. Popoola Pranita Tamma Nicholas G. Reich, University of Massachusetts - Amherst Trish M. Perl Aaron Milstone Available at: https://works.bepress.com/nicholas_reich/5/

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 July ; 34(7): 748 750. doi:10.1086/670994. Risk Factors for Persistent MRSA Colonization in Children with Multiple Intensive Care Unit Admissions Victor O. Popoola, MBBS, MPH 1, Pranita Tamma, MD, MHS 1, Nicholas G. Reich, Ph.D. 2, Trish M. Perl, MD MSc 3,4, and Aaron Milstone, MD, MHS 1,4 1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 2 Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 3 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 4 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland Abstract We studied MRSA colonized children with multiple ICU admissions to assess the persistence of MRSA colonization. Our data found that children with more than one year between ICU admissions had a higher MRSA colonization prevalence than the overall ICU population, supporting empiric contact precautions for children with prior MRSA colonization. Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the acute care pediatric setting. 1, 2 Hospitalized patients colonized with MRSA are at increased risk for MRSA infections and serve as a reservoir to spread the organism to other patients. 3 Efforts to prevent MRSA transmission in healthcare facilities often include screening programs to identify, cohort, and isolate MRSA carriers. Hospitals track patients with antibiotic-resistant organisms so they can be readily identified during subsequent admissions in an attempt to decrease MRSA transmission in health care facilities. Labeling children as MRSA positive and placing them under contact precautions can have negative consequences. 4 Additionally, the use of contact precautions adds costs to a financially extended healthcare system 5. Minimal data exist on the duration of MRSA colonization in children to inform whether MRSA colonized children should be empirically isolated during subsequent visits, especially if prolonged periods of time have passed between admissions. Our objective was to determine the proportion of children that remain persistently colonized with MRSA on subsequent admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to identify characteristics that are associated with persistent colonization. Materials and Methods Setting and Design The Johns Hopkins Hospital is a tertiary health care center with a 40-bed PICU. Since March 1, 2007, anterior nares swabs have been obtained at the time of admission and weekly Corresponding author: Aaron Milstone Johns Hopkins Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases 200 North Wolfe St. / Rubenstein 3141 Baltimore, MD 21287 Phone : 410-614-3917 Fax : 410-614-1491 amilsto1@jhmi.edu. Potential conflicts of interest: V.P, P.T and N.G.R report no conflicts.

Popoola et al. Page 2 Data Collection Statistical Analyses Results thereafter from children in the PICU and cultured for MRSA using chromogenic agar (BBL CHROMagar MRSA, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Children admitted between March 1, 2007 and June 10, 2011 were eligible for inclusion in the current study. Any PICU admission during which a patient's surveillance or clinical culture grew MRSA contributed to the overall prevalence. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: had a surveillance or clinical culture grow MRSA at any time during a PICU admission and were screened for MRSA colonization at the time of the subsequent PICU admission. Multiple paired admissions were included if each pair met the above criteria. The outcome, persistent MRSA colonization, was defined as having MRSA isolated from a surveillance or clinical culture within 48 hours of the subsequent admission. Electronic medical records and laboratory databases were reviewed to collect patient characteristics including age, race, gender, presence of any complex chronic condition (e.g., respiratory, hematological, cardiac, gastrointestinal 6, PICU admission dates, dates of all MRSA surveillance cultures, antibiotics prescribed, and additional cultures growing MRSA. Data were maintained in Microsoft Access 2007 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using Stata 11 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). Risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals were calculated from log binomial regression models using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) while accounting for clustering using an exchangeable correlation structure and robust variance estimates. Bivariate models were constructed for all variables and variables were selected for inclusion in a multivariable model if P<0.10 in bivariate models. 7 During the study period, there were 7,559 PICU admissions. Of these, 6541 patients were screened for MRSA at time of admission and 326 (5%) were either colonized with MRSA or had MRSA recovered from a clinical culture within 48 hours of admission. One hundred and thirty-six paired admissions met eligibility criteria, of which 121 patients (89%) grew MRSA from surveillance cultures and 53 (39%) from a clinical culture during the initial admission. Patients were 49% male and had a median age of 4.4 years. At the time of subsequent admission, 63 patients (46%) had persistent MRSA colonization. Of those admissions with persistent MRSA colonization, 60 (95%) grew MRSA from surveillance cultures and 22 (35%) grew MRSA from clinical cultures within 48 hours of admission (not mutually exclusive). The median time between admissions was 80 days. Of the 20 patients who had at least one year between PICU admissions, 5 (25%) had persistent MRSA colonization. Compared with the overall MRSA admission prevalence, the MRSA admission prevalence was higher in those with MRSA colonization or infection during the previous admission (46% vs 5%, p<0.001) and also in those with MRSA colonization or infection during a previous admission that was more than a year ago (25% vs 5%, p=<0.001). Demographic characteristics including age, gender, race, and insurance status were similar between patients with and without persistent MRSA colonization (Table 1). Of the 4 patients that received mupirocin in the 30 days prior to the second admission, none had MRSA recovered during the second admission. In unadjusted analysis, exposure to other antibiotics with activity against MRSA within 30 days of the subsequent PICU admission was not associated with persistent colonization. Persistent MRSA colonization had a non-statistically significant association with having both clinical and surveillance cultures growing during

Popoola et al. Page 3 Discussion Acknowledgments References the first admission (RR-1.37, p=0.09). Persistently colonized patients had a trend towards shorter duration between PICU admissions when compared to patients that did not have persistent MRSA colonization (0.37 vs 0.63 years, p=0.07). After adjusting for having both surveillance and clinical cultures grow MRSA on the first admission, for every additional year between PICU admissions the risk of persistent colonization decreased by 42% (arr 0.58 95% CI 0. 35 0.97). After adjusting for time between PICU admissions, there was a trend towards increasing risk of persistent colonization among patients having both clinical and surveillance cultures grow MRSA during the first visit (arr 1.35 95% CI 1.0 1.81). The duration of MRSA colonization in children is poorly studied and in those with repeated ICU admissions it is unknown. Our data show that MRSA colonization persists in up to 25% of children with more than one year between ICU admissions. Our results are in accord with studies in hospitalized adults that found persistent colonization in up to 21% of patients tested after four years. 8 Similar to our findings a study of pediatric outpatients found that 18% of MRSA colonized children remained colonized at 12 months. 9 The current practice of isolating known MRSA patients upon readmission to the hospital is to minimize the risk of having unidentified reservoirs for MRSA transmission in healthcare facilities. The MRSA prevalence in children with at least one year between PICU admissions (25%) was well above the MRSA prevalence in our general PICU population (5%). Therefore, our data support the use of empiric contact precautions for previously MRSA colonized children upon admission to the PICU. Despite a large population, there were only 136 paired visits. There were few children with more than 365 days between PICU admissions in this single-center study and the findings should be confirmed in other populations. Anterior nares cultures for detection of MRSA have lower sensitivity than cultures from multiple body sites so patients may have been misclassified which may have underestimated the risk of persistent colonization. 10 Given the higher prevalence of MRSA colonization in those with prior MRSA colonization and infection compared with the overall MRSA colonization prevalence in this population, the current practice of empiric contact precautions upon PICU admission appears justified in patients with previous MRSA colonization. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to further corroborate these findings and guide management of patients with a history of MRSA colonization. Financial support: This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health (1 K23 AI081752-03 to AM). A.M. received grant support from Sage Products and BioMerieux. S.A., TMP received grant support from Sage Products and Merck Pharmaceuticals, and was on the advisory board for Hospira Corporation. 1. Creel AM, Durham SH, Benner KW, Alten JA, Winkler MK. Severe invasive communityassociated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in previously healthy children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009; 10(3):323 327. [PubMed: 19307811] 2. Milstone AM, Goldner BW, Ross T, Shepard JW, Carroll KC, Perl TM. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of subsequent infection in critically ill children: Importance of preventing nosocomial methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(9):853 859. [PubMed: 21878424]

Popoola et al. Page 4 3. Milstone AM, Carroll KC, Ross T, Shangraw KA, Perl TM. Community-associated methicillinresistant staphylococcus aureus strains in pediatric intensive care unit. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010; 16(4):647 655. [PubMed: 20350379] 4. Kirkland KB, Weinstein JM. Adverse effects of contact isolation. Lancet. 1999; 354(9185):1177 1178. [PubMed: 10513715] 5. Larson EL, Cohen B, Ross B, Behta M. Isolation Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Electronic Surveillance to Monitor Adherence. Am J Crit Care. Jan; 2010 19(1):16 26. [PubMed: 19234098] 6. Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Connell FA. Pediatric deaths attributable to complex chronic conditions: national trends and implications for supportive care services. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(6):E99. [PubMed: 11389297] 7. Advani S, Reich NG, Sengupta A, Gosey L, Milstone AM. Central line-associated bloodstream infection in hospitalized children with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: Extending risk analyses outside the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(9):1108 1115. [PubMed: 21454298] 8. Robicsek A, Beaumont JL, Peterson LR. Duration of colonization with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(7):910 913. [PubMed: 19231982] 9. Fritz SA, Krauss MJ, Epplin EK, et al. The natural history of contemporary staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in community children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011; 30(4):349 351. [PubMed: 21412205] 10. Lautenbach E, Nachamkin I, Hu B, et al. Surveillance cultures for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus: Diagnostic yield of anatomic sites and comparison of provider-and patientcollected samples. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30(4):380 382. [PubMed: 19239378]

Popoola et al. Page 5 Table 1 Characteristics of patients with and without persistent MRSA colonization on sequential Pediatric Intensive Care Unit admissions Variables Persistent MRSA colonization (n=63) No Persistent MRSA colonization (n=73) d Unadjusted d Adjusted RR(95% CI) P-Value arr(95%ci) P-Value Age, median (range) 4.30(0.220.5) 4.9(0.3 18.7) - - - - Male gender, number (%) 30(47.62) 37(50.68) 0.92(0.62,1.37) 0.67 - - African American, number (%) 24(38.10) 36(49.32) 0.79(0.54,1.16) 0.23 - - Time between visits in years, mean (SD) Clinical culture grew MRSA during first admission, number (%) Surveillance culture grew MRSA during first admission Both clinical and surveillance cultures grew MRSA during the first admission a Complex chronic medical condition, number (%) 0.37(0.59) 0.63(0.72) 0.61(0.36,1.05) 0.07 0.58(0.35,0.97) 0.037 27(47.86) 26(35.62) 1.15(0.80,1.67) 0.44 - - 58(92.06) 63(86.30) 1.42(0.75,2.69) 0.28 - - 22 (34.92) 16 (21.92) 1.37(0.96,1.96) 0.09 1.35(1.0,1.81) 0.051 50(79.37) 58(79.45) 1.00(0.63,1.59) 0.99 - - Clindamycin, n (%) 5(7.94) 2(2.74) 1.62(0.89, 2.92) 0.11 - - Bactrim, n (%) 6(9.52) 5(6.85) 1.15(0.60., 2.22) 0.67 - - Linezolid, n (%) 1(1.59) 1(1.37) 0.98(0.82, 1.16) 0.80 - - Vancomycin b, n (%) Mupirocin b, c, n (%) RR Relative Risk; arr adjusted relative risk 25(39.68) 14(19.18) 1.03(0.97,2.19) 0.906 - - 0(0) 4(5.48) - - a ICD9 codes were collected for each patient's hospitalization and categorized into underlying complex chronic medical conditions. 6,7 For comparison, patients were grouped as having any or no complex chronic condition. b Only includes antibiotics received at our institution within 30 days prior to second PICU admission. c All four patients with recent mupirocin use were excluded from adjusted analysis. d Risk ratios calculated using log binomial models