The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018, 5(1): Research Article

Similar documents
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

Chapter 2. Disk diffusion method

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Background and Plan of Analysis

Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Laboratory determination of the susceptibility to antibiotics of bacteria isolated from aquatic animals Peter Smith

Brief reports. Heat stability of the antimicrobial activity of sixty-two antibacterial agents

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Abstract... i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope Definitions... 1

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Original Article. Hossein Khalili a*, Rasool Soltani b, Sorrosh Negahban c, Alireza Abdollahi d and Keirollah Gholami e.

Received 10 November 2006/Returned for modification 9 January 2007/Accepted 17 July 2007

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

BSAC antimicrobial susceptibility

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing

Study of drug resistance pattern of principal ESBL producing urinary isolates in an urban hospital setting in Eastern India

Study of Bacteriological Profile of Corneal Ulcers in Patients Attending VIMS, Ballari, India

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

REPORT RING TEST SCREENING FOR ANTIMICROBIAL SUBSTANCES WITH THE NEW BELGIAN KIDNEY TEST (NBKT)

Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance and Sensitivity with Reference to Ages of Elders

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage

Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Theoretical Investigation on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Media Issued by: LABORATORY MANAGER Original Date: April 11, 2001 Approved by: Laboratory Director Revision Date: February 27, 2004

DO NOT WRITE ON or THROW AWAY THIS PAPER!

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio cholerae Causing Diarrohea Outbreaks in Bidar, North Karnataka, India

Short Report. R Boot. Keywords: Bacteria, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, quality, diagnostic laboratories, proficiency testing

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Irrational use of antimicrobial agents often

Comparative In Vitro Activity of Prulifloxacin against Bacteria Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Siriraj Hospital

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Christiane Gaudreau* and Huguette Gilbert

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

New Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic Lab: Title: Investigating the Effects of Various Antibiotics on Bacterial Resistance

Scholars Research Library

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

Fg/ml into the gentamicin and tobramycin panels, and 12 and 24 pig/ml into the amikacin. panels. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)

Tel: Fax:

The Disinfecting Effect of Electrolyzed Water Produced by GEN-X-3. Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University

Title: Use of a proposed antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for Haemophilus parasuis

Fluoroquinolones resistant Gram-positive cocci isolated from University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Jan A. Jacobs* and Ellen E. Stobberingh

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Canine Urinary Tract Infections

Performance Information. Vet use only

Preliminary investigation of antibiotic resistant and susceptible Campylobacter in retail ground beef in the United States.

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Transcription:

, 2018, 5(1):145-152 Available online www.tpcj.org Research Article ISSN: 2349-7092 CODEN(USA): PCJHBA In Search of the Truth about the Quality of Mueller Hinton Agar and Tested Antimicrobial Discs Daniela V. Pencheva*¹, Katia S. Ivancheva¹, Mina V.Rumenkina¹, Aleksandrina M. Al-Dzhasem¹, Ivan N. Ivanov 2 1 Bul Bio-National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 26 Yanko Sakazov Blvd., 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 26 Yanko Sakazov Blvd., 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract Objectives: The main goal of the provided experiments was to test the influence of the used in the Disc Diffusion Method (DDM) Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) and to establish its reflection on the interpretation of the antimicrobial test. Methods: This study is based on developed microbiological methodology and outworked protocol for qualification of the Mueller Hinton agar when it is used in Disc Diffusion Method in order to obtain reliable and reproducible results on quality indicators for MHA, appointed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Results: Conducted studies showed the influence of the used medium MHA or MHA II on the zones of inhibition of antimicrobial discs in DDM, which can impact the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility of isolates. This kind of testing of the medium MHA gives also the opportunity to establish some deviations in the activity of the antimicrobials used in the production of antimicrobial discs. In serial experiments was encountered a problem with the activity of Gentamicin substance that affects the quality of produced batches antimicrobial discs with him. Conclusions: The experiments established the influence of the used medium MHA or MHA II on the zones of inhibition of antimicrobial discs in DDM. The used protocol with microbiological testing was very helpful as for evaluation of the MHA and for establishment of antimicrobials activity deviations. Keywords Mueller Hinton agar, Disc Diffusion Method, zones of inhibition, antimicrobial discs, Gentamicin Introduction The quality of the supplied Mueller Hinton Agar, is essential for proper interpretation of the results of antibiogram by isolates from clinical specimens. The medium is designed and intended exclusively for use exactly for testing antimicrobial sensitivity of microorganisms. In this regard are set stringent standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing on Disc Diffusion Method as well, according to CLSI [1], also according to EUCAST[2], which must be met in order not to report variations in the interpretation of the zones of inhibition[3,4]. These are identified as critical indicators for their impact on different antibiotics. Such requirements are related to thickness of the spilled in the plate medium, as well at ph of the MHA, content of thymine and thymidine, and also variation in the amount of bivalent cations (Ca 2+, Mg 2+ ). The first two parameters were fixed values, but for last two was mentioned only that the variation in their quantity will affect the size of the zones of inhibition of specific groups cited antibiotics and so can affect the interpretation of the antibiogram results. When performing routine quality control of each produced batch MHA should be established its suitability for use in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates, observing 145

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 the requirements of the EUCAST [5]. Materials and Methods Materials and Equipment The study included MHA, produced from "Hi Media" and supplied by "BB-NCIPD" and MHA II, production of "BBL", spilled in plastic plates in "BB-NCIPD" according to the requirements of CLSI and EUCAST in a layer with 4 mm thickness. The test required 8 plates of each type of MHA. Were conducted parallel studies at the developed indirect method of medium MHA "Hi Media" lot N 215 790 and dehydrated media MHA II "BBL" lotn3084480, prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and spilled under the same conditions of good manufacturing practices, equipment and personnel. The test was conducted in January 2016. Were used antimicrobial discs in shelflife: Gentamicin 10 μg / disc, "Bio Lab", BBL, HiMedia and "BB- NCIPD"; Tobramycin 10 μg / disc, "Bio Lab" and "BB-NCIPD"; Erythromycin 15 μg / disc, "BB-NCIPD"; Tetracycline 30μg / disc, "BB-NCIPD"; Doxycycline 30μg / disc, "BB-NCIPD"; Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim 23.75 / 1.25μg / disc "BB-NCIPD". The control strains used in the experiment were: P. aeruginosa ATCC, S. aureus ATCC25923, S. aureus ATCC 29213, E. coli ATCC 25922, E. faecalis ATCC29212. For standardization to turbidity 0.5 MF of the inoculum DENSILAMETER II and Vortex mixerwere used. Petri dishes with antibiograms were incubated in incubator Memmert at 35º C. To measure the ph of MHA and MHAII ph meter Metrohm 744 was used. Methodology Preliminary preparation for quality control of MHA in a petri Seven plates with MHA from each manufacturer were placed to control of sterility at 35º C for 24 hours. The eighth petri with MHA was placed in refrigerator for 24 hours and in the following day after tempering to 25 C was used for the direct measurement of a ph value with the surface electrode of the ph meter. The interpretation of results is made according to theoretical instructions in CLSI M100-S17 [6]. Selected for analysis under critical indicators were representative types antimicrobial discs of the respective groups of antibiotics, shown in Table 1, 2, 3 and 4. All of the used antimicrobial discs in the developed microbiological method and control strainsare presented in Table 1. Table 1: Required to conduct the entire test antimicrobial discs and placing them on the corresponding control microorganism. Reference strain Antimicrobial disc Gentamicin 10μg P. aeruginosa ATCC Tobramycin 10μg Ciprofloxacin 5μg Clindamycin 2μg S. aureus ATCC 25923 Erythromycin 15μg Sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim 23.75 / 1.25 μg Tetracycline 30μg E. coli ATCC 25922 Doxycycline 30μg Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim 23.75 / 1.25 μg E. faecalis ATCC 29212 Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim 23.75/1.25 μg A disc with sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim 23.75 / 1.25 μg was placed moreover on plate with E. faecalis ATCC 29212 also on plates with inoculations of E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 (as required by CLSI M 100) in order to identify deviations from the eligible zones on the reference strains at routine quality control of the disc. The discs determined for each reference strain are placed always on two plates, to obtain a statistically significant result, by taking into account at least two zones of each type of disc on a reference strain. The established zones of inhibition are reflected in the tables as an arithmetic mean. 146

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 Variation in the content of bivalent cations / basicly calcium and magnesium The increased content of bivalent cations reduces the diameter of the zones of inhibition of discs with aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines on strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The reduced content of bivalent cations leads to an inconsistent large zones of inhibition. Table 2: Interpretation of the zones of inhibition obtained from Antimicrobial discs required for identifying any irregularities in critical indicator "content of divalent cations" Indicator: content of Ca 2+ and Mg 2 + Antimicrobial Disc Zone greater than the upper limit Zone less than the lower limit gentamicin 10μg, tobramycin10μg tetracycline 30μg, the content of Ca 2 + and Mg 2 + is too the content of Ca 2 + and Mg 2 + is too doxycycline30μg, low high Interpretation of variations in ph according to established by the CLSI standards (7.2 to 7.4) At ph value lower than 7.2 antimicrobial substances from the group of aminoglycosides, quinolones and macrolides would be inactivated, while other agents (tetracycline) become more active, which is manifested in larger zones of inhibition. At ph value higher than 7.4 could be expected the opposite effect. Table 3: Interpretation of the zones of inhibition obtained from Antimicrobial discs needed for identifying any irregularities in the critical indicator ph Indicator: рн Antimicrobial Disc Zone greater than the upper limit Zone less than the lower limit ciprofloxacin 5μg clindamycin 2μg erythromycin15μg gentamicin 10μg, tobramycin10μg ph is higher than 7.4 ph is less than 7.2 tetracycline 30μg, doxycycline30μg ph is less than 7.2 ph is higher than 7.4 The inappropriate content of thymine or thymidine affects at the inhibitory effect of sulfonamides and trimethoprim. The increased content of thymine or thymidine may have an opposite effect on the inhibitory activity of the sulphonamides and trimethoprim, resulting in giving smaller and less distinct zones or totally lacking such. This will give a wrong interpretation of the results for resistance. For properly balanced against the content of thymine and thymidine media clear zones of inhibition with a diameter 20 mm at placed disc with trimethoprim / sulfamethoxazole on Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 have to be observed. For ineligible result according this indicator the media MHA will be with missing zones of inhibition or the zone will be<20 mm. Table 4: Interpretation of the zones of inhibition obtained from Antimicrobial discs needed for identifying any irregularities in critical indicator "content of thymine and / or thymidine." Indicator: content of thymine and / or thymidine Antimicrobial disc Zone greater than 20 mm Zone less than 20 mm Sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim 23.75 / 1.25μg The medium is with corresponding content of thymine and / or thymidine The medium hastoo high content of thymidine Results Before starting the test at the developed protocol to characterize medium MHA, the ph of the plates, spilled with agar from the two batches tested media was measured directly with a surface electrode, establishing compliance with the norm. Due received a different interpretation at discs gentamicin and tobramycin in the study were included as antimicrobial discs produced by the company "Bull Bio-NCIPD" and discs offered by "Bio Lab". The results of a comparative study are presented in Tables 5 and 6. 147

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 Table 5: Results from testing the properties of MHA "Hi Media" lot N 215 790 by the indirect microbiological method Antimicrobial discs, Producer Microbial strain АТСС According.. Zone (mm) Conclusion Gentamicin 10μg/disc, Gentamicin 10μg/disc, Bio Lab Tobramycin 10μg/disc, Tobramycin 10μg/disc, Bio Lab Erythromycin 15μg/disc, Tetracycline 30μg/disc, Norm (mm) CLSI:16-23 23.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : EUCAST: 17-23 CLSI:16-21 21 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : CLSI: 19-25 23.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : CLSI: 19-25 21 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : EUCAST: 20-26 S.aureus ATCC25923 CLSI: 22-30 30.5 S.aureus ATCC EUCAST: 23-28.5 29213 29 E.coli ATCC 25922 CLSI: 18-25 26 S.aureus ATCC EUCAST: 23-30.5 29213 31 рн /7.2-7.4/: Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : Doxycycline 30μg/disc, E.coli ATCC 25922 CLSI:18-24 24 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim 23.75/1.25μg/disc E.faecalis ATCC29212 CLSI: > 20 32 Thymidine: EUCAST:26-34 According to the used protocol, developed to characterize MHA for testing of antimicrobial discs of the two companies on plates with the medium MHA, lot N 215 790 production of "Hi Media" it was found that the zones of inhibition for all discs were in norm which covers the quality criteria of the medium according to the requirements by indicators. Table 6: Results of testing the quality of MHA II "BBL" lot N3084480 through the indirect microbiological method Antimicrobial discs, Producer Gentamicin 10μg/disc, Gentamicin 10μg/disc, Bio Lab Microbial strain АТСС According.. Norm (mm) Zone (mm) Conclusion CLSI:16-23 25.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : EUCAST: 17- in 23 in CLSI:16-21 22.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : in 148

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 Tobramycin 10μg/disc, Tobramycin 10μg/disc, Bio Lab Erythromycin 15μg/disc, Tetracycline 30μg/disc, Doxycycline 30μg/disc, Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim 23.75/1.25μg/disc in CLSI: 19-25 28.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : in in CLSI: 19-25 23.5 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : EUCAST: 20-26 CLSI: 22-30 29 EUCAST: 23-28 29 S.aureus ATCC25923 S.aureus ATCC 29213 E.coli ATCC 25922 CLSI: 18-25 24 S.aureus ATCC EUCAST: 23-24 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : 29213 31 E.coli ATCC 25922 CLSI:18-24 23 Са 2+ and Mg 2+ : E.faecalis ATCC29212 CLSI: > 20 31.5 Thymidine: EUCAST:26-34 The comparison of the properties of the MHA and MHA II is visualized in Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between the properties of both type Muelller Hinton Agar - MHA and MHA II. On the left side it is petri with MHA and on the right side petri with MHA II. (Legend: S/T Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim, G- Gentamicin.Tb- Tobramycin, E- Erythromycin, T - Tetracycline D- Doxycycline.) 149

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 When testing the same antimicrobial discs on plates with medium MHA II "BBL" lot 3084480 it was taken account of the change in the interpretation of two types of disc loaded with gentamicin and tobramycin, which are representatives of aminoglycoside antibiotics. At discs with gentamicin, produced bythe two companies was established according to the protocol discrepancy in two indicators: the content of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ and ph (norm: 7.2-7.4).At the discs loaded with tobramycin discrepancy was once again taken into account under the same two indicators, but only on discs that are produced by "BB-NCIPD". Those production of "Bio Lab", were in norm.taking into account that the ph is established in a norm by direct measurement of the media with surface electrode, reporting of discrepancy in this indicator is embarrassing. In search of the reason for this, the study was expanded to focus on testing as required by CLSI for discs loaded with gentamicin in shelf life offered by four different companies (Figure 2, Table 7). Figure 2: Comparison between the properties of MHA and MHA II with gentamicin discs and tobramicin discs, produced by other companies. Table 7: Zones of inhibition according to the standards for quality control of antimicrobial discs CLSI, production of 4 different companies on medium of "HiMedia". Zone of inhibition of Gentamicin 10 µg / disc (mm) Control strain according CLSI E.coli ATCC 25922 S.aureus ATCC 25923 P. aeruginosa ATCC Norm BBL, lot BBL, lot BioLab, BioLab, BB - HiMedia, according N 5273907, N 5026760, lot N lot N NCIPD, lot N CLSI Exp. Exp. 140725, 141226B, lot N 0000262136, 31.10.2019 28.02.2019 Exp. 03.2017 Exp. 08.2017 460116, Exp. 12.2016 Exp. 04.2018 19-26 14.5 14.5 14 13.5 18.5 18 19-27 18 18 18 16.5 22 22 17-23 18.5 19 20.5 15.19 24 25.5 Discussion A deviation in the zones of inhibition was observed on the strain E. coli ATCC 25922 at all tested batches of discs with gentamicin of the 4 companies. It should be noted that close to the lower limit of norm for the strain are discs, production of "BB -NCIPD" and "HiMedia", while those of the batches of "BBL" and "BioLab", have a much greater deviation in direction downwards from the norm. The same trend was observed also at testing on S. aureus 150

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 ATCC 25923 and P. aeruginosa ATCC, although the discs of all companies were in norm for corresponding strains. In search of the truth about the problem was raised the issue for the used at the quality control microbial strains. A testing with strain E. coli ATCC 25922 taken from the Reference Laboratory "Control and monitoring of antibiotic resistance" at NCIPD was also conducted and the resulting zones of inhibition were similar. It is noteworthy that in a study of EUCAST the quality of antimicrobial discs on 9 manufacturers conducted in two consecutive years only in 2014 was tested the disc with gentamicin from 8 companies. In 2015 in the monitoring of this disc participate only 4 companies [7]. BD and Oxoid are not among them, despite that they had participated in the previous monitoring. This raises the suspicion that the problem with the disc gentamicin really exists. Hence, the question for adequate load with an antibiotic of the discs was raised, which in turn is mainly determined by the activity of the used antimicrobial substance. In microbiological testing of batches of ampoules with injectable gentamicin from 3 different pharmaceutical companies, and 3 different batches substances gentamicin from "Sigma - Aldrich" (lots SLBK9711V; SLBG7734V; SLBM9736V), the established activity was below 50% of the result declared by the manufacturer. This raises the question of the necessity of centralized control of the used in praxis antibiotics and in particular on the critical indicator for them - the activity of the antimicrobial substances. It is well known that antibiotics have different activity in vivo than in vitro, especially in sputum[8].the use of gentamicin is intravenous and applicable in situations when we are searching for synergism or at life threatening infections [9,10]. Conclusion Conducted studies showed the influence of the used medium MHA or MHA II on the zones of inhibition of antimicrobial discs in DDM, which can impact the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility of isolates. The microbiological testing was very helpful also for the establishment of antimicrobials activity deviations as during the test a problem with the activity of Gentamicin substancethat affects the quality of the produced batches of antimicrobial discs with it was encountered. Manufacturers bear the responsibility for not releasing lots of antimicrobial discs with low activity for sale, as this could affect the determining the antibiotic sensitivity of the tested bacterial isolates and at the end of the chain it would affect the usefulness of the prescribed treatment to the patient. Acknowledgments For the general administrative support of Bul Bio-NCIPD and NCIPD in the process of testing of Mueller Hinton agar and antimicrobial discs with gentamicin. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Declarations Funding: No funding. This study was conducted as part of our routine work. Competing Interests: None to declare. Ethical Approval: Not required References 1. CLSI M02-A11, Vol. 32 No. 1, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility Tests ; Approved Standard-Eleventh Edition, January 2012. 2. EUCAST, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, EUCAST disc diffusion method, version 5.0., January 2015 3. Thamlikitkul, V., & Tiengrim, S. (2008). Effect of different Mueller Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 62(4), 847-848. 151

Pencheva DV et al, 2018, 5(1):145-152 4. Hindler, J. A., & Inderlied, C. B. (1985). Effect of the source of Mueller-Hinton agar and resistance frequency on the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of clinical microbiology, 21(2), 205-210. 5. EUCAST, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Routine and extended internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST, Version 5.0., valid from 09.01.2015. 6. CLSI M 100, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing S 24, v34, 1, January 2014. 7. EUCAST Development Laboratory (EDL), Wide variation in discs quality in 16 discs from nine manufacturers, Sweden, 16 June 2016http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Disk_test_documents/Warnings/Su mmary_evaluation_of_selected_disks_from_nine_manufacturers_update_june_2016.pdf 8. Levy, J. (1986). Antibiotic activity in sputum. The Journal of Pediatrics, 108(5), 841-846. 9. Belfrage, S., Banck, G., & Nordström, L. (1973). Treatment with gentamicin. Application and therapeutic effect. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology, Suppl- 241. 10. Korner, B. (1973). Gentamicin therapy administered by intermittent intravenous injections. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology, Suppl-241. 152