Effect of human vicinity on antimicrobial resistance and integrons in animal faecal Escherichia coli

Similar documents
Chapter 6: Extending Theory

Chapter 6: Extending Theory

Testimony of the Natural Resources Defense Council on Senate Bill 785

Chapter 8 Livestock Board Import Rules Statement of Reasons

Antimicrobial Resistance: Do we know everything? Dr. Sid Thakur Assistant Professor Swine Health & Production CVM, NCSU


Antibiotic resistance of bacteria along the food chain: A global challenge for food safety

Mechanisms and Pathways of AMR in the environment

CHAPTER 8 LIVESTOCK BOARD IMPORT RULES

Antimicrobial use in poultry: Emerging public health problem

Livestock Board. General Agency, Board or Commission Rules. Chapter 2: Vaccination Against and Surveillance for Brucellosis

Trend Analysis

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN COMMENSAL E. COLI FROM LIVESTOCK IN BELGIUM: Veterinary Epidemiology

Aabo, Søren; Ricci, Antonia; Denis, Martine; Bengtsson, Björn; Dalsgaard, Anders; Rychlik, Ivan; Jensen, Annette Nygaard

S 0347 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Nova Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences Page: 1

Christiane Gaudreau* and Huguette Gilbert

Presence of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

ESCHERICHIA COLI RESISTANCE AND GUT MICROBIOTA PROFILE IN PIGS RAISED WITH DIFFERENT ANTIMICROBIAL ADMINISTRATION IN FEED

Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Topics to be Covered

MID 23. Antimicrobial Resistance. Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance Acquisition of Foreign DNA

An HSUS Report: Animal Suffering in the Egg Industry

Project Summary. Impact of Feeding Neomycin on the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli O157:H7 and Commensal Organisms

Approved by the Food Safety Commission on September 30, 2004

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

Martin Chénier, Ph.D. Microbiology. Antibiotics in Animal Production: Resistance and Alternative Solutions

Integrated Analysis of Data on Resistance and Antimicrobial Consumption from the Human and Animal Sectors in Europe The JIACRA Report

Antimicrobial Resistance

Urban Water Security Research Alliance

CITY OF ELEPHANT BUTTE ORDINANCE NO. 154

The epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance and the link between human and veterinary medicine

Drd. OBADĂ MIHAI DORU. PhD THESIS ABSTRACT

Keep Antibiotics Working. Statement for the Record

Changing Practices to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance

Randall Singer, DVM, MPVM, PhD

Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Program in Food-Producing Animals in Japan

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

Informing Public Policy on Agricultural Use of Antimicrobials in the United States: Strategies Developed by an NGO

UPDATE ON DEMONSTRATED RISKS IN HUMAN MEDICINE FROM RESISTANT PATHOGENS OF ANIMAL ORIGINS

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. P.L. Ho 1, R.C. Wong 2, K.H. Chow 1 and T.L. Que 2. Abstract

Antibiotic resistance profile of bacterial isolates from food sold on a University campus in south western Nigeria

THE CAT FANCIERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

species for use by humans through

The effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment on antibiotic resistant Salmonella populations in feedlot cattle

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERN OF YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA ISOLATED FROM MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS*

Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Ross Beier 1, T. Poole 1, Dayna Harhay 2, and Robin Anderson 1 1

Origins of Resistance and Resistance Transfer: Food-Producing Animals.

Objectives. Antibiotics uses in food animals 3/25/2018. California Dairy Productions. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Animal Production Environment

ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN

Antimicrobial use and Antimicrobial resistance: chapter 6.7 and 6.8 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health

Antimicrobial Drug on Drug Resistance in the Lactose-Fermenting Enteric Flora

Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio cholerae Causing Diarrohea Outbreaks in Bidar, North Karnataka, India

MRSA ST398 from swine and cattle

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

THE CAT FANCIERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

THE LONG ROAD TO RECOVERY: Wetlands and Wildlife One Year Into the Gulf Oil Disaster

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

Animal Antibiotic Use and Public Health

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella Typhi From Kigali,

Sales survey of veterinary medicinal products containing antimicrobials in France in Annual report

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Alejandro H. Buschmann Centro i-mar & CeBiB Universidad de Los Lagos Puerto Montt - Chile

R-factor mediated trimethoprim resistance: result of two three-month clinical surveys

A 10-Year Review of a Minimally Invasive Technique for the Correction of Pectus Excavatum

University Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Faculty of veterinary medicine-skopje

THE EVALUATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM RAW MEAT

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance among commensal Escherichia coli in rural and urban areas in Southern India

Frank Møller Aarestrup

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN SALMONELLA ISOLATED FROM PORK, CHICKEN MEAT AND HUMANS IN THAILAND

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Antibiotic Resistance The Global Perspective

SELECT NEWS. Florfenicol Monograph: Injectable & Oral Therapy for Swine

Twenty Years of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Where Are We And What Is Next?

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW BY-LAW #

Molecular Epidemiology of Enteric infections in Eastern Africa

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

Antimicrobial resistance in indicator Escherichia coli from free-ranging. livestock and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE

CambodiaCase Study. An integrated surveillance study of AMR in Salmonella subspp, Campylobacter spp, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp in poultry

What do we know about multidrug resistant bacteria in New Zealand s pet animals?

Antibiotics & Resistance

Overview of NARMS Program and Detecting Emerging/Novel Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Using WGS

(Amended ) Page 1 of 34

Trends en voorkomen van resistenties bij Salmonella, Campylobacter en E. coli geïsoleerd uit de voeding

Received 7 May 2010/Accepted 9 November 2010

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods

RELIABLE AND REALISTIC APPROACH TO SENSITIVITY TESTING

Policy Brief and Recommendations #4 Misuse of Antibiotics in Food Animal Production. Antibiotic Misuse in Food Animals Time for Change

Characterization of isolates from a multi-drug resistant outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia. coli O145 infections in the United States

120 mln. 17 mln. The Netherlands. 12 million swine. 100 million poultry. 1,5 million dairy cows. 1 million veal calves. 1,5 million sheep and goats

What does multiresistance actually mean? Yohei Doi, MD, PhD University of Pittsburgh

Transcription:

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (26) 57, 1215 1219 doi:1.193/jac/dkl122 Advance Access publication 31 March 26 Effect of human vicinity on antimicrobial resistance and integrons in animal faecal Escherichia coli David Skurnik 1, Raymond Ruimy 1, Antoine Andremont 1, Christine Amorin 2, Pierre Rouquet 3, Bertrand Picard 2 and Erick Denamur 2 * 1 Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP and EA3964, Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 7518 Paris, France; 2 INSERM U722 and Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, UFR de Médecine, Site Xavier Bichat, 16 rue Henri Huchard, 7518 Paris, France; 3 Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), BP 769, Franceville, Gabon Received 18 January 26; returned 16 February 26; revised 1 March 26; accepted 14 March 26 Objectives: To determine the level of antimicrobial resistance and the occurrence of class 1, 2 and 3 integrons in faecal Escherichia coli from several animal populations variously exposed to human contact. Methods: A collection of 341 faecal E. coli isolates was constituted from several animal populations subject to various degrees of exposure to humans: 18 never exposed to humans (living in the Antarctic or Gabon), 71 wild living in a low human density area (mountainous region of the Pyrenees, France), 61 wild living in a higher human density area (Fontainebleau forest near Paris, France), and 128 extensively reared and 42 dogs, both living in the Pyrenees. Resistance to antimicrobial agents was determined by the method of disc diffusion and quantified using the resistance score of BE Murray, JJ Mathewson, HL DuPont, CD Ericsson and RR Reves (Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 199; 34: 515 18). Integrons were characterized by triplex realtime PCR and sequencing. The absence of epidemiologic clones was confirmed by PCR-based methods. Results: A gradient of resistance ranging from absence to high prevalence (resistance score of 18.7%) and a gradual increase in the prevalence of class 1 integrons (from % to 16%), both correlated with the increase in exposure to humans, were observed. In wild with little contact with humans, resistance, when present, was not mediated by integrons. Conclusions: Our findings firmly establish that the current prevalence of antimicrobial resistance found in animal faecal bacteria, as well as the prevalence of integrons, is clearly anthropogenic. The presence of integrons may constitute an adaptive process to environments whose antimicrobial pressure exceeds a certain threshold. Keywords: selective pressure, environment, wild, domestic, s Introduction Animal and human commensal microbiota, especially intestinal microbiota, are subjected to numerous antimicrobial pressures due to ing practices and veterinary and human medicines. They have been suggested to play a major role in disseminating bacterial resistance. Indeed, an enormous number of bacterial species are present at high density in an environment allowing exchange between bacteria, and these bacteria can disseminate among ecosystems via the contact between humans and, the food chain and the recycling of animal waste as fertilizer. A few studies have concomitantly documented the prevalence of multiresistant bacteria and integrons, highly efficient molecular tools used by the bacteria for antimicrobial resistance acquisition and expression, in human commensal microbiota. They showed that, although at a lower rate than in clinical isolates, both are clearly present, with an integron prevalence of about 15%. 1,2 Several authors have documented a high prevalence of integrons in intensive reared, ranging from 23% to 44%, 1,3 a level comparable to the prevalence found in human clinical isolates. 4 Some studies have been devoted to comparing the level of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria... *Corresponding author. Tel: +33-1-44-85-61-56; Fax: +33-1-44-85-61-49; E-mail: denamur@bichat.inserm.fr... 1215 Ó The Author 26. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Skurnik et al. isolated from the faeces of wild with the level in in contact to humans. 5,6 However, no definitive conclusions were reached since the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was variable according to the studies. The only data available on integron prevalence in wild were described in strains (n = 48) isolated from free-living geese, with a range of % (geese not near animal food facilities) to 36% (geese interacting with swine waste lagoons). 7 In this work, we have surveyed the prevalence of acquired antimicrobial resistance and characterized the integrons in faecal Escherichia coli isolated from several animal populations subject to various degrees of exposure to humans. Materials and methods E. coli were isolated between 21 and 23 from fresh faeces collected from (i) 15 wild birds and mammals, (ii) 128 extensively reared and (iii) 42 dogs. The 15 wild can be classified into three distinct populations, according to their human contact, as follows: a population of 18 living in areas with human densities 1 inhabitant per km 2, including the Antarctic (n = 4) and pristine forest in central Gabon (n = 14); a population of 71 in the middle mountain region of the central Pyrenees, France, with <5 inhabitants per km 2 ; and a population of 61 in the Fontainebleau forest near Paris, France, with 2 inhabitants per km 2. Both the 128 and 42 dogs were living in the central Pyrenees. Some of the were epidemiologically related as these lived in five different s and as in each 1 6 by species were studied. A full description of the animal species studied is given in Table S1 [available as Supplementary data at JAC online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)]. The isolates were identified as E. coli using API 2E strips (API, La Balme-les-Grottes, France). One E. coli colony per sample was studied, except in the Antarctic and Gabon populations, in which one to three distinct isolates per animal were analysed (39 isolates for 18 ). In these populations, isolates from a single animal were considered as distinct if they belonged to different E. coli phylotic group/subgroups, determined using triplex PCR (see below). Strains were assigned to the seven E. coli phylotic group and subgroups using triplex PCR based on the presence or absence of three DNA fragments (chua, yjaa and TSPE4.C2) as described by Escobar-Paramo et al. 8 In addition, the presence of four virulence determinants (pap, sfa, hly and aer) was tested by PCR, as described previously. 9 Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by the method of disc diffusion, according to the guidelines of the French Society of Microbiology antibiogram committee (CASFM, www.sfm.asso.fr). The seven resistance markers tested were representative of the spectrum of mechanisms leading to antimicrobial resistance and included amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, tetracycline (for plasmidic resistance) and nalidixic acid (for chromosomal resistance). When a strain carried an integron, the marker trimethoprim was also tested. Class 1, 2 and 3 resistance integrons were detected and characterized as described previously by Skurnik et al. 2 Significant differences between groups were determined by the c 2 test using the R statistical system software (www.r-project.org). P <.5 was considered significant. Results and discussion Isolates from never exposed to humans (living in the Antarctic or Gabon) were totally free of resistance. Of the isolates from wild living in the low human density area (mountainous region of the central Pyrenees) 17% were resistant to at least one antimicrobial, versus 49% of isolates from wild living in a higher human density area (Fontainebleau forest near Paris) (c 2 : P <.1). No difference in the prevalence of resistance to at least one antimicrobial was observed in the E. coli isolated from the wild in the Fontainebleau area, the or the s. However, when resistance scores (calculated as the ratio of the total number of observed resistance to the total number of possible resistance 1) 1 reflecting multiresistance to antimicrobials were considered, the isolates from were more resistant than those from wild (c 2 : P <.1), but less resistant than those from s (c 2 : P <.1). As an element of comparison, the isolates from s exhibited a similar level of resistance to that of isolates from 49 healthy French subjects working in the bank or insurance sector who had taken no antimicrobials during the month before sampling (Figure 1). 2 Integrons were only found in E. coli isolated from the living in close contact with humans: (7%) and s (16%). All integrons were of class 1 only. For comparison, the prevalence of integrons in the E. coli faecal flora of the French subjects was 16% (Figure 1). 2 Characterization of the integrons from the animal strains showed strikingly little diversity in their cassette content (Table 1). This contrasted with the great heteroity of the integrons previously found in clinical isolates, 4 but was in agreement with what had been observed in human commensal isolates, in which all the cassettes were derivatives of aada or dfra. 2 As regards the integrons identified in the strains from, the low diversity of their cassettes was even more pronounced than what was reported for human commensal isolates, 2 because all the integrons except one carried the same Resistance scores (%) 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Antarctic/Gabon wild Prevalence of integrons Resistance scores Pyrenees mountain wild Fontainebleau forest wild Pyrenees Populations Pyrenees s Healthy French subjects Figure 1. Resistance scores and prevalence of integrons in faecal E. coli isolates from wild living in areas with different human densities, i.e. the Antarctic/Gabon (n = 39), central Pyrenees, France (n = 71), and the Fontainebleau forest near Paris, France (n = 61), and from extensively reared (n = 128) and dogs (n = 42), both from the central Pyrenees, compared with commensal E. coli isolated from healthy French subjects (n = 49) and studied by the same approach. 2 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Prevalence of integrons (%) 1216

Antimicrobial resistance in animal faecal E. coli Table 1. Strain patterns and integron characteristics of the resistant animal faecal E. coli isolates Strain pattern a Integron characteristics strain pattern number phylotic group and subgroups virulence antibiotic resistance phenotype b n c cassette fragment size (bp) host source I(n =2) d A no AMX II (n =4) A no TET III (n =1) A no AMX/SUL/TET IV (n =2) A no SUL/ 2 none/ 1/12 Oryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)/gallus gallus (chicken) V(n =2) A 1 no KAN VI (n = 14) A 1 no TET VII (n =1) A 1 no AMX/TET 1 sat1-aada1 13 Sus scrofa VIII (n =1) A 1 no SUL/ IX (n =1) A 1 no AMX/ X(n =1) A 1 no SUL/ XI (n =2) A 1 aer AMX/SUL/ STR//TET 2 / domestica (pig) 12/12 Canis familaris /Canis familaris XII (n = 1) B1 no AMX XIII (n = 15) B1 no TET XIV (n = 1) B1 no AMX/TET XV (n = 3) B1 no AMX/SUL/TET 1 dfra15 5 Canis familaris XVI (n = 1) B1 no AMX/ XVII (n = 4) B1 no SUL/ 2 aada1/ 8/12 Gallus gallus (chicken)/equus caballus (horse) XVIII (n = 1) B1 no AMX/SUL/ 1 12 Sus scrofa domestica (pig) XIX (n = 1) B1 hly TET XX (n =1) B1 hly, aer TET XXI (n = 1) B1 pap AMX/SUL/ CHL/ XXII (n = 1) B1 pap AMX/SUL/CHL/ /NAL XXIII (n = 1) B1 pap, aer AMX/SUL/CHL/ XXIV (n = 1) B1 pap, aer AMX/SUL/CHL/ 1 aada1 8 Canis familaris /NAL XXV (n =5) B2 2 no TET XXVI (n =1) B2 2 no AMX/SUL/KAN/ XXVII (n =1) B2 2 no AMX/SUL/CHL/ XXVIII (n =1) B2 2 sfa, hly SUL/STR XXIX (n =1) B2 2 pap, sfa, aer TET XXX (n =9) B2 3 no TET XXXI (n =1) B2 3 aer AMX/TET XXXII (n =1) B2 3 aer AMX/SUL/TET 1 dfra15 5 Canis familaris XXXIII (n =1) B2 3 pap, hly TET XXXIV (n =1) B2 3 pap, sfa TET s 1217

Skurnik et al. Table 1. (continued) Strain pattern a Integron characteristics strain pattern number phylotic group and subgroups virulence antibiotic resistance phenotype b n c cassette fragment size (bp) host source XXXV (n =1) B2 3 pap, sfa, AMX/NAL aer, hly XXXVI (n = 23) D 1 no TET XXXVII (n =1) D 1 no SUL 1 sat1-aada1 13 Equus caballus (horse) XXXVIII (n =3) D 1 no AMX/TET XXXIX (n = 1) D1 no AMX/SUL XL (n =1) D 1 no SUL/STR 1 aada1 8 Bos taurus (cow) XLI (n =1) D 1 no XLII (n =1) D 1 no AMX/SUL/ 1 dfra7 5 Canis familaris XLIII (n =1) D 1 no AMX/SUL/CHL/ 1 12 Canis familaris XLIV (n =1) D 1 hly AMX/SUL/CHL XLV (n =2) D 2 no TET XLVI (n =1) D 2 no XLVII (n =1) D 2 no SUL/ 1 aada1 8 Sus scrofa domestica (pig) XLVIII (n =1) D 2 aer AMX/SUL/CHL/ XLIX (n =1) D 2 aer AMX/SUL/CHL/ /NAL a The strain pattern is defined as the association of the E. coli group/subgroup, the virulence content and the antibiotic resistance phenotype. b AMX, amoxicillin; STR, streptomycin; KAN, kanamycin; CHL, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline; SUL, sulfamethoxazole; NAL, nalidixic acid. c n, Number of strains carrying an integron in each strain pattern. d n, Number of isolates in each strain pattern. cassette: aada1, either alone or with dfra1 or sat1 (Table 1). The only integron found without aada1 in an E. coli strain isolated from a animal was in fact an empty integron, with 5 and 3 conserved segments, but without cassettes. Such empty integrons have been found in coliform bacteria isolated from an aquatic environment and seem to be indicators of the absence of sustained antimicrobial pressures. 11,12 As regards the integrons found in our isolates, the cassette distribution was very similar to the one we previously found in human commensal isolates. 2 When all the resistance and integron data were taken into account, no difference was observed between the commensal and human isolates, suggesting that they were subject to the same selective pressure. To determine whether the presence of resistant isolates in different ecosystems was caused by the spread of certain clones or of resistance s, we analysed the membership of the seven E. coli phylotic group/subgroups as well as the virulence content profile of the isolates (Table 1). We found that the strain patterns were extremely heteroous, suggesting that, as found by others, 1 the presence of resistant strains and of integrons in the different ecosystems of our study was not due to the spread of specific clones. Of note, among resistant isolates, only one strain belonging to the B2 phylotic group carries an integron (Table 1). In all, we observed a gradient of resistance ranging from absence to high prevalence (resistance score > 18%); this gradient correlated with the level of exposure to humans and/or human activities. We also found a link between the presence of integrons and exposure to humans. In France, the consumption of antimicrobials is 36.5 Defined Daily Dose/1 inhabitants/day, and 1382 tonnes of antibiotics, half of them consisting of tetracycline, are consumed each year in veterinary medicine. Therefore, exposure to humans and ing activities can probably be associated with increased antimicrobial selective pressure. The fact that in the Pyrenees the difference between the resistance scores for wild and (5% versus 11) (Figure 1) almost disappeared when resistance to tetracycline was removed from the data (4% versus 5) strengthens this hypothesis. We noted with interest that the traditional link between integron prevalence and antibiotic resistance 4 was present in the E. coli isolated from s and, but not in resistant strains from the wild, which had less contact with humans and/or human activities, as reported for free-living geese. 7 Thus, even though strains were still resistant, integron prevalence decreased and then disappeared as contact with humans decreased. This suggests that the presence of integrons may constitute an adaptive process to environments whose antimicrobial pressure exceeds a certain threshold. 1218

Antimicrobial resistance in animal faecal E. coli Acknowledgements We are grateful to all those who spent a great deal of time and patience collecting the faeces (M. Denamur, J. L. Crampe from the Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, G. Lecointre from the Museum National d Histoire Naturelle, C. Parisot, S. Gouriou, M. Godefroy, P. Lustrat, S. Breton, V. Deschaumes, D. Christophe and C. Bornot). We thank E. Gadreau for editing the manuscript. This work was supported in part by a grant to E. D. from La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. Transparency declarations None to declare. Supplementary data Table S1 is available as Supplementary data at JAC online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/). References 1. Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 25; 55: 639 44. 2. Skurnik D, Le Menac h A, Zurakowski D et al. Integron-associated antibiotic resistance and phylotic grouping of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy subjects free of recent antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 25; 49: 362 5. 3. Sunde M, Sorum H. Characterization of integrons in Escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine. Microb Drug Resist 1999; 5: 279 87. 4. Martinez-Freijo P, Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ et al. Class I integrons in Gram-negative isolates from different European hospitals and association with decreased susceptibility to multiple antibiotic compounds. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42: 689 96. 5. Osterblad M, Norrdahl K, Korpimaki E et al. Antibiotic resistance. How wild are wild mammals? Nature 21; 49: 37 8. 6. Lillehaug A, Bersgsjo B, Schau J et al. Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., verocytotoxic Escherichia coli, and antibiotic resistance in indicator organisms in wild cervids. Acta Vet Scand 25; 46: 23 32. 7. Cole D, Drum DJ, Stalknecht DE et al. Free-living Canada geese and antimicrobial resistance. Emerg Infect Dis 25; 11: 935 8. 8. Escobar-Paramo P, Grenet K, Le Menac h A et al. Large-scale population structure of human commensal Escherichia coli isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 24; 7: 5698 7. 9. Picard B, Garcia JS, Gouriou S et al. The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect Immun 1999; 67: 546 53. 1. Murray BE, Mathewson JJ, DuPont HL et al. Emergence of resistant fecal Escherichia coli in travelers not taking prophylactic antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 199; 34: 515 18. 11. Park JC, Lee JC, Oh JY et al. Antibiotic selective pressure for the maintenance of antibiotic resistant s in coliform bacteria isolated from the aquatic environment. Water Sci Technol 23; 47: 249 53. 12. Rosser SJ, Young HK. Identification and characterization of class 1 integrons in bacteria from an aquatic environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 44: 11 18. 1219