A Quantitative Analysis of the Number of Spay/Neuters and Adoptions Required to Reduce the City of Los Angeles Euthanasia Rate to Zero

Similar documents
PROJECT CATSNIP IN PALM BEACH COUNTY COUNTDOWN TO ZERO

An Analysis of the Effect of Females First on Cat and Dog Populations

A Report on Trap/Alter/Release Programs (c) By Karen Johnson

Target Your Spay/Neuter Efforts

AnimalShelterStatistics

2017 ANIMAL SHELTER STATISTICS

PROJECT CATSNIP IN PALM BEACH COUNTY COUNTDOWN 2 ZERO

We re diggin the progress of our new. Animal Campus! A big "WOOF-out" to all of the amazing folks who are helping #takeushome

Community Cats and the Ecosystem

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Open all 4 factors immigration, emigration, birth, death are involved Ex.

SAVING COMMUNITY CATS: Case studies from the real world. Julie Levy, Maddie s Shelter Medicine Program Shaye Olmstead, Operation Catnip

TORONTO S FERAL CATS TODAY. TorontoFeralCatCoalition.ca

Port Alberni & the BC SPCA: Help us continue our Successful Pet Overpopulation Strategy

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Does Spay/Neuter Have a People Problem? Presented by Amy Mills September 2013 Alberta SPCA Conference

SPAY / NEUTER: IT S NOT JUST ABOUT KITTENS AND PUPPIES

AnimalShelterStatistics

ALUMNI - Austin TX partners - Live Release Rate -- Year over Year

Population Dynamics: Predator/Prey Teacher Version

Cat Math A math lesson on pet overpopulation

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

A New Approach to Saving Cats?

Pupils work out how many descendents one female cat could produce in 18 months.

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

No Frill No Kill: A New Approach to Saving Cats?

Offering a Humane Solution to Feline Overpopulation LOCATED IN HAMILTON, MONTANA

Truly Targeted Spay/Neuter

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Colorado Animal Shelter Data Trends Discussion Group April 13, 2015

MANAGING CAT COLONIES. Dr. Julie Levy

MLA Research Paper (Berger)

Organization. Fax No hyphens, e.g

A Case Study of the Effectiveness of TNR on a Feral Cat Colony

Cats in Canada A five year review of overpopulation

Birth and Death Rate Estimates of Cats and Dogs in U.S. Households and Related Factors

Spay & Neuter Overview

Pediatric spay/neuter Providing spay/neuter - Shelter animals - Owned animals Spay/Neuter: Targeting, Techniques, & Special Considerations

GIS Checklist. A guide to reducing shelter intake in your community For Use with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Shelter Research & Development

Friends of Animals of Jackson County

Animal Control Budget Unit 2760

Winnebago County Animal Services

Taimie L. Bryant * Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. INTRODUCTION

How Pets Arrived at the SPCA

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Feral Freedom. FERAL FREEDOM: Keeping community cats out of shelters

Pierce County. November 8, 2018

Free-roaming community cats

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

Winnebago County Animal Services

Today s Agenda. Why does this matter? A Dangerous Mind. Data Collection. Data Analysis. Data Interpretation. Case Studies

Introduction. Primary objective. To Spay or Not to Spay That is the question. If to Spay When to spay. Do we know the answers?


Veterinary Care for Shelter Pets

The Cat s Meow! Kids learn about our relationship with cats. Hot Diggity Dogs! Explains how dogs became members of our. ASPCA AnimaLessons

MEMORANDUM. The Honorable Carrie M. Austin Chairman, Committee on the Budget and Government Operations

FIREPAW THE FOUNDATION FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION PROMOTING ANIMAL WELFARE

SEC BREEDING AND TRANSFER OF DOGS AND CATS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,168, Eff. 5/18/00, Oper. 11/15/00.)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

Cat Survey Key Findings Report. Released March 2014 Multnomah County Animal Services

Dates of Last Fiscal Year: Begin: 10/01/13 End: 09/30/14. Number of Paid Employees: Full Time: 0 Part Time: 0

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Santa Barbara County Animal Care Foundation Creative Brief Comm 166. Rachel Johnsen

2015 THE YEAR IN REVIEW

Mendocino County Animal Care Services

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Great Lakes Animal Welfare Conference October 2015 Starting a Kitten Nursery

Stanislaus Animal Services Agency

Mission. a compassionate community where animals and people are cared for and valued. Private nonprofit

IS ORANGE COUNTY GOING TO THE DOGS?

Persuading Municipal Officials to Go With TNR

NEW VOLUNTEER GUIDELINES

Alice Burton. Benefits of a Community, Animal Control, and Shelter Supported TNR Program. Presented by

Foster Home Application

We will spay or neuter community (free roaming) cats at no cost to citizens of Greenville County.

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

WHY DO THEY EXIST HOW TO MANAGE THEM CONFLICT RESOLUTION

2014 Annual Report Helotes Humane Society

Animal Services Update. Presented to the Quality of Life & Government Services Committee September 11, 2012

Animal Care Expo Return to Field. Bryan Kortis

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

Alice Burton. Benefits of a Community, Animal Control, and Shelter Supported TNR Program. Presented by

Virtual Shelter Project You Can Save Your Pet s Life Without A Shelter.

Grant ID: 220. Application Information. Demographics.

The domestic cat (Felis catus) has played a vital role in human lives for centuries.

6. SPAY/NEUTER: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR PET CARETAKERS LIVING IN POVERTY-- WE CAN T GET TO ZERO WITHOUT THEM

Animal Services Department

The Connecticut Animal Population Control Program

Population characteristics and neuter status of cats living in households in the United States

SPCA Serving Erie County and Feral Cat FOCUS: Working Together to Help Feral Cats

Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Rapid Cycling Brassica Parts III & IV

Agreement Between the Town of North Castle and the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Westchester, Inc. 2016

Targeted TNR: Making an Impact

Model Community Cat Ordinance

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT NO.

Fact Sheet WHY TRAP-NEUTER-RETURN FERAL CATS? THE CASE FOR TNR. Research. What is Trap-Neuter-Return? Trap-Neuter-Return Stabilizes Feral Cat Colonies

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

MEET THE PLAYERS PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENTS APPROVAL OF TNR

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Transcription:

A Quantitative Analysis of the Number of Spay/Neuters and Adoptions Required to Reduce the City of Los Angeles Euthanasia Rate to Zero Prepared by Humane America Animal Foundation Background In this paper, we present a rough model that determines the effects of spay/neuter programs, adoption programs, and pet-owner education programs on the number of euthanasias performed by City of Los Angeles shelters. We then estimate the number of spays, neuters, and adoptions each year that will be required to reduce the total annual number of euthanasias performed by city shelters to zero within five years. The number of euthanasias performed is strictly the number of adoptable animals that enter the shelter minus the number of animals redeemed to their owners minus the number of animals adopted out. To reduce the number of euthanasias, programs need to do one or both of the following: Reduce the number of animals entering the shelters Increase the number of animals being adopted out of the shelters Our two primary sources of information about the Los Angeles pet population are the City of Los Angeles Department of Animal Services, and a survey of City of Los Angeles pet owners that we performed in December of 1999 (See our report, [Ref1]). The following table comes from the City of Los Angeles Department of Animal Services:

Dog Intake: Cat Intake: Total Intake: Dogs Adopted: Cats Adopted: Total Animals Adopted: Dogs Redeemed: Cats Redeemed: Total Animals Redeemed: Adoptable Dogs Euthanized: Adoptable Cats Euthanized: Total Adoptable Animals Euthanized:

According to our 1999 survey of City of Los Angeles pet owners, we found the following: Approximate number of owned dogs in the City of LA: 367,000 Approximate number of owned cats in the City of LA: 254,000 Approximate number of fed stray cats in the City of LA: 157,600 Assumptions: 1. Steady state We assume that the current owned dog and cat populations are in a steady state; that is, the number of animals leaving each population is equal to the number of animals entering each population. We use the FY 1999 statistics reported by the Department of Animals Services as our starting point. The number of animals leaving the owned pet population is the sum of city shelter intake and deaths due to natural causes. We are implicitly assuming that the number of animals that migrate out of the city matches the number of animals that migrate into the city. Since dogs have an average life span of 12.5 years, we can calculate a natural annual death rate of 0.08. That means that an average of 8% of the dogs in a population will die of natural causes each year. Similarly, the fact that cats have an average life span of 14 years implies a natural annual death rate of approximately 0.07. This gives us a total of 69,944 (= 367,000*0.08 + 44,961-4,377) dogs and 40,717 (=254,000*0.07+23,157-220) cats leaving and entering the owned population each year if no new programs are put into action. 2. Dogs and cats entering the owned population Based on our survey of Los Angeles pet owners [Ref1], we found that currently owned dogs come from the following sources: City Shelter Adoptions: 15% Private Shelter Adoptions: 10% Friend/Relative/Street/Born at home: 50% Pet Store or Breeder: 25% According to the City of Los Angeles Animal Services Department, there were 6,235 dogs adopted out of city shelters during FY 1999. This is about 10% of the animals entering the population. Private shelters report adopting out a similar number of dogs. We will assume that the fraction of people getting dogs from friends, relatives, the street, or at home has increased by 2.5% as has the fraction of people getting dogs from pet stores or breeders. This gives us the following distribution of dogs entering the population this year: City Shelter Adoptions: ~10% ( 6,235) Private Shelter Adoptions: 10% ( ~6,994 (= 69,944*0.10)) Friend/Relative/Street/Born at home: 52.5% (~36,721(= 69,944*0.525)) Pet Store or Breeder: 27.5% (~19,234 (= 69,944*0.275)) We use the same technique to analyze the cats entering the owned population that we do for dogs. Our survey of Los Angeles pet owners tells us that currently owned cats come from the following sources:

City Shelter Adoptions: 25% Private Shelter Adoptions: 10% Friend/Relative/Born at home: 45% Street 10% Pet Store or Breeder: 10% According to the City of Los Angeles Animals Services Department, there were 3,437 cats adopted out of city shelters during FY 1999. This is about 10% of the animals entering the population. We will assume that the other sources of cats have all increased equally (~4.125%) to account for the lower fraction of animals currently coming from the city shelters and that the following distribution now approximately holds: City Shelter Adoptions: ~8.5% ( 3,437) Private Shelter Adoptions: 14.125% (~5,751 (= 40,717* 0.14125)) Friend/Relative/Born at home: 49.125% (~20,002 (= 40,717* 0.49125)) Street 14.125% (~5,751 (= 40,717* 0.14125)) Pet Store or Breeder: 14.125% (~5,751 (= 40,717* 0.14125)) Since we are assuming the number of dogs leaving the population equals the number of dogs entering the population, we can estimate that in a given year, 52.5% (from Friend/Relative/Street/Born at home) of dogs originated from the fertile females and males in the population. Note we are also assuming that any stray dogs picked up by the city are born to owned dogs as opposed to stray dogs, since we suppose most stray dogs will not be able survive long enough without an owner in the city to be able to have a litter. We are assuming that the number of older animals that people receive from friends or relatives is small and that the migration of animals out of the population cancels out the migration of animals into the population. We assume that the cats that people receive from the street are from litters of feral cats and that only the cats received from friends, relatives, or are born at home are the products of owned fertile cats. We will assume that the number of kittens entering the owned population from the feral population is constant. When we reduce the number of fertile female and male owned animals in the city, some of the people that would receive animals from friends or relatives or their own home litter will now have to either go to other sources for animals or not get animal at all. We are assuming that half of these people will not get an animal, a quarter will now adopt animal, and a quarter will now go to a breeder or pet store. It is a nice side effect that by performing spays and neuters, we should see an automatic increase in the number of adoptions. We assume that all animals leaving public or private shelters are spayed or neutered. 3. Dogs and cats entering city shelters We will assume that the shelter dog (or cat) intake for a given year is a constant percentage of the number of dogs (or cats) that entered the population during that year and the previous two years. We think this is a reasonable approximation since most dogs or cats entering the shelter have been owned for less than three years and a great majority of dogs and cats in shelters are less than three years old. This assumption is in part based on the fact that a negligible number of the cats that come into the shelter are feral. We also assume that each year 5% of the last three years of adopted dogs and cats are returned to the shelter and that 22% of the last three years of dogs (and 23% of cats) received from other sources are brought to the shelter. The primary reason for the difference in relinquishment rates is that a large number of the non-adopted animals relinquished are turned in because the owner could not find a home for them.

Approximately 79% (= (6,235+26,000) / (44,961-4,377)) of dogs and 85% (= (3,437+19,000)/(23,157-220) of cats entering city shelters that were not redeemed to their owner during FY 1999 were adoptable animals. We assume that these fractions will stay constant. 4. Fertile Female and Males According to our survey, 56% of owned dogs are female, and 23% of female dogs are fertile. This yields a total of 47,280 (= 367,000*0.56*0.23) fertile female dogs. 44% of owned dogs are male, and 17% of male dogs are fertile. This yields a total of 27,452 (= 367,000*0.44*0.17) fertile male dogs. Our survey also found that 57% of owned cats are female, and 27% of female cats are fertile. This yields a total of 39,091 (= 254,000*0.57*0.27) fertile female cats. 43% of owned cats are male and 40% of these dogs are fertile yielding 43,688 (= 254,000*0.43*0.40) fertile male cats. We assume that the number of fertile females has a three times greater impact on the number of offspring generated the next year than the number of males. So, to calculate the number of offspring generated by a population of fertile females and males, we multiply the number of fertile females by three, add the number of fertile males, and multiply that by 0.217 (=36,721 / (3*47,280 + 27,452)) for dogs and 0.138 (= 20,002/(3*39,091+27,452)) for cats. This calculation gives us the numbers we observe for the current year. Clearly this is a rough approximation, but it should produce reasonable estimates as long as neither the number of fertile males nor the number of fertile females gets too close to zero. Each year, we will estimate the number of fertile females/males as follows: the number of fertile females/males from the year before _ the number of fertile females/males that die that year + the number new fertile females/males that enter the population _ the number of additional spays/neuters performed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the number of fertile females/males in the owned population for a given year Estimating Effects We have implemented the above assumptions in a model using Microsoft Excel that predicts effects of three kinds of changes: Increasing the number of adoptions from city shelters Increasing the number of spays and/or neuters of animals Increasing the retention of non-adopted animals Dogs: If no programs are put into effect, we can expect an average of 26,000 euthanasias to continue to occur every year for the foreseeable future, ignoring any major shifts in the Los Angeles human population. This gives us about 130,000 euthanasias over a five year period. Animals acquired from sources other than shelters are more likely than an adopted shelter animal to be relinquished and euthanized. They can also be unaltered and therefore at risk of reproduction. Since some adopted shelter animals will take a place in a home that might have otherwise been filled by one of these higher risk animals, an increase of 1,000 additional shelter adoptions for one year actually reduces the total euthanasias over the five-year period by about 1,201. After 5 more years only about 18 more lives are saved, since the population is reproducing at a marginally lower rate due to the fact that all adopted animals are spayed or neutered. If instead, 1,000 additional spays are performed over one year, we estimate that 971 lives are saved over the following 5 year period and that an additional 1,116 are saved over the next 5 years since we have significantly lowered the number of fertile females in the population. Education of new pet owners can have a large impact on number of euthanasias performed. Increasing the

retention rate of non-adopted dogs by one percentage point for just one year results in saving 1,131 lives over the following 5 years. Of course, since the retention does increase the number of fertile females in the population, the total lives saved over a 10 year period is lower: about 632. A balanced combination of all three techniques can be used to reach an annual rate of zero euthanasias after 5 years: Year Spays Neuters Adoptions Non-adopted dog retention rate Euthanasias of adoptable dogs at city shelter 0 0 0 0 77% 26,000 1 12,500 4,000 5,000 78% 19,527 2 13,000 4,000 7,250 80% 13,468 3 12,000 4,000 9,160 82% 7,289 4 6,500 2,000 10,700 83% 2,549 5 6,500 2,000 11,816 83% 0 This results in saving a total of approximately 87,169 lives over the five year period and puts the dog population into a new steady state that saves the full 26,000 lives every year from this period onward. Each year after this, only about 3,500 additional spays, 1,100 additional neuters, and 10,800 additional adoptions are needed, as long as the non-adopted dog retention rate is maintained at least 83%. Cats: We see very similar effects when modeling the cat population: Program Lives saved over a 5 year period Lives saved over a 10 year period 1000 additional adoptions in first year 1,232 1,269 1000 spays 627 1,427 Increase non-adopted retention rate by 1% 827 576

A balanced combination of all three techniques can be used to reach an annual rate of zero euthanasias after 5 years: Year Spays Neuters Adoptions Non-adopted cat retention rate Euthanasias of adoptable cats at city shelter 0 0 0 0 77% 19,000 1 12,500 4,000 4,000 78% 14,020 2 12,500 4,000 5,750 80% 9,548 3 9,000 4,000 7,900 82% 4,340 4 4,000 1,000 9,100 83% 931 5 4,000 1,000 9,123 83% 0 This results in saving a total of approximately 66,162 lives over the five year period and puts the cat population into a new steady state that saves the full 19,000 lives every year from this period onward. Each year after this, only about 3,000 additional spays, 1,000 additional neuters, and 8,600 additional adoptions are needed, as long as the non-adopted cat retention rate is maintained at least 83%. References 1: McKee, Doug, An Analysis of the City of Los Angeles Pet Population and Attitudes Towards Pet Adoption and Spay/Neuter, Humane America Technical Report, 2000.