Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Similar documents
Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Success for a MRSA Reduction Program: Role of Surveillance and Testing

Screening programmes for Hospital Acquired Infections

Burden of disease of antibiotic resistance The example of MRSA. Eva Melander Clinical Microbiology, Lund University Hospital

Evaluating the Role of MRSA Nasal Swabs

Surveillance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections Activity C: ELC Prevention Collaboratives

Why should we care about multi-resistant bacteria? Clinical impact and

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swabs as a Tool in Antimicrobial Stewardship

MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. Has the post antibiotic era arrived? Dr. Michael A. Borg Infection Control Dept Mater Dei Hospital Malta

FM - Male, 38YO. MRSA nasal swab (+) Due to positive MRSA nasal swab test, patient will be continued on Vancomycin 1500mg IV q12 for MRSA treatment...

Konsequenzen für Bevölkerung und Gesundheitssysteme. Stephan Harbarth Infection Control Program

Horizontal vs Vertical Infection Control Strategies

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update

Surveillance cultures: Can they help our decisions

Nosocomial Infections: What Are the Unmet Needs

Institutional and Patient Level Predictors of Multi-Drug Resistant Healthcare- Associated Infections. Monika Pogorzelska

The International Collaborative Conference in Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Exploring the Role of Antibiotics on VRE Colonization and Infection

MAJOR ARTICLE. Impact of MRSA Surveillance on Bacteremia CID 2006:43 (15 October) 971

MAGNITUDE OF ANTIMICROBIAL USE. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Acute and Long Term Healthcare Facilities: Design, Implementation and Challenges

03/09/2014. Infection Prevention and Control A Foundation Course. Talk outline

Antibiotic Stewardship in the Hospital Setting

How to Organize an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team in a Hospital. Bojana Beović

MDRO in LTCF: Forming Networks to Control the Problem

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE: ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN THE ELDERLY CHETHANA KAMATH GERIATRIC MEDICINE WEEK

Impact of a Standardized Protocol to Address Outbreak of Methicillin-resistant

Epidemiology of early-onset bloodstream infection and implications for treatment

The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes

(DRAFT) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVES: CARBAPENEM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

Risk Factors for Persistent MRSA Colonization in Children with Multiple Intensive Care Unit Admissions

Antibiotic usage in nosocomial infections in hospitals. Dr. Birgit Ross Hospital Hygiene University Hospital Essen

Policy Forum. Environmental and Professional Hygiene: Toward the Prevention of Drug Resistant Infections

MRSA in the United Kingdom status quo and future developments

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia differ depending on the control group chosen

MRSA Control : Belgian policy

Jump Starting Antimicrobial Stewardship

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

Responders as percent of overall members in each category: Practice: Adult 490 (49% of 1009 members) 57 (54% of 106 members)

Will 10 Million People Die a Year due to Antimicrobial Resistance by 2050? Prof. Stephan Harbarth Infection Control Program Geneva, Switzerland

LA-MRSA in the Netherlands: the past, presence and future.

Preventing Surgical Site Infections. Edward L. Goodman, MD September 16, 2013

VCU study suggests antimicrobial scrubs may reduce bacteria May also help decrease risk of MRSA transmission to patients

Study Protocol. Funding: German Center for Infection Research (TTU-HAARBI, Research Clinical Unit)

Incidence of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in patients at risk

Meropenem for all? Midge Asogan ICU Fellow (also ID AT)

3/1/2016. Antibiotics --When Less is More. Most Urgent Threats. Serious Threats

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

Le infezioni di cute e tessuti molli

Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile Infection. Jocelyn Srigley, MD, FRCPC November 1, 2012

Multi-Drug Resistant Gram Negative Organisms POLICY REVIEW DATE EXTENDED Printed copies must not be considered the definitive version

Birgit Ross Hospital Hygiene University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany. Should we screen for multiresistant gramnegative Bacteria?

Antimicrobial stewardship

8/17/2016 ABOUT US REDUCTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE THROUGH THE USE OF AN ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM

Infection Control Manual Residential Care Part 3 Infection Control Standards IC7: 0100 Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Healthcare-associated infections surveillance report

Approval Signature: Original signed by Dr. Michel Tetreault Date of Approval: July Review Date: July 2017

Other Enterobacteriaceae

Monthly Webinar. Tuesday 16th January 2018, 16:00. That Was The Year That Was : Selections from the 2017 Antimicrobial Stewardship Literature

SURVEILLANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL IN AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

MODELING THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION PREVENTION STRATEGIES. Rachel Rubin Bailey. B.S., Tulane University, 2007

An Approach to Appropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Outpatient and LTC Settings?

Linda Taggart MD FRCPC Infectious Diseases Physician Lead Physician, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program St. Michael s Hospital

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS

Antibiotics utilization ratio in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

What is an Antibiotic Stewardship Program?

Collecting and Interpreting Stewardship Data: Breakout Session

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2016

ANTIBIOTICS IN THE ER:

Objectives 4/26/2017. Co-Investigators Sadie Giuliani, PharmD, BCPS Claude Tonnerre, MD Jayme Hartzell, PharmD, MS, BCPS

MRSA Outbreak in Firefighters

LINEE GUIDA: VALORI E LIMITI

MRSA control strategies in Europekeeping up with epidemiology?

Cefazolin vs. Antistaphyloccal Penicillins: The Great Debate

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report

Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Acute Care Facilities

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report December 2018

Hot Topics in Antimicrobial Stewardship. Meghan Brett, MD Medical Director, Antimicrobial Stewardship University of New Mexico Hospital

NHS Scotland MRSA Screening Pathfinder Programme

Surgical prophylaxis for Gram +ve & Gram ve infection

NUOVE IPOTESI e MODELLI di STEWARDSHIP

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

The Impact of meca Gene Testing and Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Intervention on the Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for ACCEPTED

DR. MICHAEL A. BORG DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL MATER DEI HOSPITAL - MALTA

So Why All the Fuss About Hand Hygiene?

UPDATE ON ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP REGULATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AMS PROGRAM

Antibiotic stewardship in long term care

Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use Prevalence Survey

Get Smart For Healthcare

MDRO: Prevention in 7 Steps. Jeanette Harris MS, MSM, MT(ASCP), CIC MultiCare Health System Tacoma, Wa.

Treatment Duration for Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia: The Evidence in Support of 5 Days

Staphylococcus aureus and Health Care associated Infections

Understand the application of Antibiotic Stewardship regulations in LTC. Understand past barriers to antibiotic management concepts

A Prospective Investigation of Nasal Mupirocin, Hexachlorophene Body Wash, and Systemic

Hosted by Dr. Jon Otter, Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, King s College, London A Webber Training Teleclass 1

Surveillance of AMR in PHE: a multidisciplinary,

Transcription:

Impact of routine surgical ward and intensive care unit admission surveillance cultures on hospital-wide nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital: an interrupted time-series analysis Chaberny IF et al. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2008) 62, 1422-14291429 Daniel Gilstrap, MD Robert Hallowell, MD

Background Approximately 32% (~90 million) and 0.8% (~2.3 million) of the US population is colonized with MSSA and MRSA respectively. Kuehnert MJ et al. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006; 193:172-99 Staphylococcal Disease Burden The proportion of healthcare associated staph infections that are due to MRSA has been increasing: 2% in 1974, 22% in 1995 and 64% in 2004 Klevens RM et. al. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006, 42:385-391391 MRSA acquisition is highly associated with subsequent infection in hospital Hospital-acquired acquired MRSA infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, with prolongation of hospital stay and attributable and total direct costs. MRSA vs MSSA bacteremia -increased risk of mortality with odds ratio of death 1.93 -increased attributable median length of stay 2 days -median attributable hospital charge $6,916 Cosgrove SE et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:53-9

Observed Incidence Rates of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a Klevens, R. M. et al. JAMA 2007;298:1763-1771. 298 1771 Copyright restrictions may apply.

Tip of the Iceberg Clinically obvious infections represent only a small number of those colonized Admission cultures allow identification of unrecognized reservoir appropriate barrier precautions and handwashing Several studies have shown reduction in ICU acquired nosocomial infections with admission screening

Study Design Hypothesis/Goal: Admission screening on surgical wards and ICU s are effective in reducing the incidence of all MRSA infections and nosocomial MRSA infections Setting: 1400 bed university hospital with 129 intensive care medicine beds and 212 major surgical beds in Hannover, Germany. Participants : adults admitted to ICU s and surgical wards (ie trauma, visceral, CT, and vascular) Study Design: single center prospective quasi-experimental design via an analysis of an interrupted time series Quasi-experimental experimental research selecting groups, upon which h a variable is tested without any pre-selection randomization. Interrupted time series

Data Collection/analysis MRSA positive - + clinical sample, + screening culture, or history of MRSA infection/colonization - every hospital stay was a separate case MRSA colonization screening cultures without signs of infection MRSA infections clinical signs/symptoms of infection with +sample Nosocomial MRSA infection + clinical specimen/screening culture >48h from admission Analysis - Incident Densities - Segmented regression analysis

Table 1. Hospital demographics and incidence densities per 1000 pd of MRSA and of performed nares cultures, 2002 0606 Parameter 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Hospital demographics no. of patients 40 225 39 129 44 647 46 785 48 338 no. of pd 391 516 385 842 401 015 396 863 412 440 length of stay (days) 8.9 8.9 8.4 8.0 8.0 MRSA patients/1000 pd 0.56 0.80 1.47 1.49 1.64 MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.26 0.29 0.40 0.25 0.18 nosocomial MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.11 0.19 0.23 0.13 0.10 nares cultures/1000 pd 2.3 4.7 11.6 18.6 20.4

Table 1. Hospital demographics and incidence densities per 1000 pd of MRSA and of performed nares cultures, 2002 0606 Parameter 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Hospital demographics no. of patients 40 225 39 129 44 647 46 785 48 338 no. of pd 391 516 385 842 401 015 396 863 412 440 length of stay (days) 8.9 8.9 8.4 8.0 8.0 MRSA patients/1000 pd 0.56 0.80 1.47 1.49 1.64 MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.26 0.29 0.40 0.25 0.18 nosocomial MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.11 0.19 0.23 0.13 0.10 nares cultures/1000 pd 2.3 4.7 11.6 18.6 20.4

Table 1. Hospital demographics and incidence densities per 1000 pd of MRSA and of performed nares cultures, 2002 0606 Parameter 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Hospital demographics no. of patients 40 225 39 129 44 647 46 785 48 338 no. of pd 391 516 385 842 401 015 396 863 412 440 length of stay (days) 8.9 8.9 8.4 8.0 8.0 MRSA patients/1000 pd 0.56 0.80 1.47 1.49 1.64 MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.26 0.29 0.40 0.25 0.18 nosocomial MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 0.11 0.19 0.23 0.13 0.10 nares cultures/1000 pd 2.3 4.7 11.6 18.6 20.4

Changes in the hospital-wide incidence density of MRSA-infected patients/1000 pd 30 months before and 24 months after the intervention (INT = implementation admission screening for MRSA, 6 month implementation period) Chaberny, I. F. et al. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008 62:1422-1429; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn373 Copyright restrictions may apply.

Changes in the hospital-wide incidence densities of all MRSA patients, MRSA-infected patients and nosocomial MRSA-infected patients per 1000 pd 30 months before and 24 months after the intervention (INT = implementation admission screening for MRSA, 6 month implementation period) Chaberny, I. F. et al. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008 62:1422-1429; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn3731093/jac/dkn373 Copyright restrictions may apply.

Table 2. Results of segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series evaluating the impact of the admission screening policy on the incidence density of MRSA-infected patients, nosocomial MRSA-infected patients and MRSA-positive patients per 1000 pd in the whole hospital Model coefficients i Coefficient i P value 95% confidence interval MRSA-infected patients constant 0.195 <0.001 0.188 0.271 slope before INT 0.007 0.001 0.003 0.012 change in level after INT 0.163 0.006 0.276 to 0.050 change in slope after INT 0.010 0.007 0.018 to 0.003 Nosocomial MRSA-infected patients constant 0.073073 0011 0.011 0.017 0129 0.129 slope before INT 0.006 <0.000 0.003 0.009 change in level after INT 0.122 0.004 0.204 to 0.040 change in slope after INT 0.008008 0.004004 0.013013 to 0.003003 All MRSA patients (infected or colonized) constant 0.281 0.001 0.119 0.444 slope before INT 0.034 <0.001 0.026 0.042 change in level after INT NS change in slope after INT 0.015 0.002 0.032 to -0.001

Conclusions Admission screening for MRSA in ICUs and surgical floors lowers the rate of hospital- wide MRSA infection and nosocomial MRSA infection

Strengths of the Study Included a large number of patients and patient- days Each phase of the study was 2-2.52.5 years long, covering multiple seasons Alcohol availability and isolation practices similar to many other academic institutions (external validity)

Threats to Internal Validity Phase 1 and 2 are separated in time--could the results be due to other factors with a temporal relationship (e.g. change in antibiotic use) Phase 1 and 2 were of different durations. Start date for phase 2 appears arbitrary Study design is subject to maturation effect-- perhaps the rates of MRSA would have decreased naturally as part of a cyclical process Difficulty in getting OSH records would overestimate the rate of nosocomial infection

Threats to Internal Validity (2) Patient demographics are not accounted for, and can change over time Lack of patient demographics makes it difficult to judge external validity Readmits are counted multiple times in the design --> decreasing readmit rate (not accounted for) would show favorable results Determination of true MRSA infection was made by a single physician, without a protocol

Threats to Internal Validity (3) Decreasing LOS would result in decreased risk for MRSA infection or is decreased LOS the result of fewer MRSA infections? The existence of such a study could make the use of alcohol l and isolation i practices more frequent, thus confounding the effect of screening No audit of isolation practices or hand-washing procedures

Further Discussion i External Validity: Can we apply this study to JHH? --Beds: 1400 vs 950 --LOS > 8 vs 5.9 --Comparable ab # of annual discharges (~45,000) --Study hospital focused on transplants --Unknown patient demographics (age, IVDU, comorbidities