Annual Report. Zoonotic Infectious Disease Surveillance. Environmental Health Division Special Programs Section

Similar documents
Table of Contents. Introduction 3. Mosquito Borne Diseases 3. Mosquito Surveillance 4. Clark County 5. Nye County 7. White Pine County 7

Flea, rodent, and plague ecology at Chuchupate Campground, Ventura County, California

FAUNAL DATA, SAN PEDRO PRESERVATION PROJECT

Culverts and Fencing to Reduce Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions and Maintain Permeability

Notes on louse-host associations of the Great Salt Lake Desert with keys to the lice

Biology and Control of Insects and Rodents Workshop Vector Borne Diseases of Public Health Importance

Feline zoonoses. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee 12/09

Surveillance For Sin Nombre Virus And Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome In California, 1993 To 1997

Zoonotic Diseases. Risks of working with wildlife. Maria Baron Palamar, Wildlife Veterinarian

MAMMAL SPECIES SEEN AT SCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE INDEX OF 14 SPECIES

Coyote (Canis latrans)

2014 Update of the odd Zoonotic Diseases on Navajo

Select Mammals of Loudoun County

GRASSLAND MAMMALS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS. * = Illinois endangered species list; ** = threatened in Illinois; # = federally = extirpated

Public Health Pest Control Learning Objectives. Category 8, Public Health Pest Control. After studying this section, you should be able to:

About Ticks and Lyme Disease

Rabies Postexposure Treatment Recommendations. Jennifer House, DVM, MPH, DACVPM Veterinary Epidemiologist

Mexican Wolves and Infectious Diseases

PLAGUE. Dan Salkeld. Postdoc, Lane Lab Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management UC Berkeley

ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2014

Mammalogy Laboratory 6 - Rodents II: Castorimorpha and Myomorpha

Santa Clara County Vector Control District Operations and Surveillance Report October 2018

Investigation of potential rabies exposure situations

The patient has WHAT? Zoonotic Diseases: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Dr. Meredith Faires BSc(Agr), DVM, MSc, PhD

ANIMALS AFFECTED WHAT IS RABIES? INCIDENCE AND DISTRIBUTION NEED TO KNOW INFORMATION FOR RABIES: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Care and Handling of Pets

Santa Clara County Vector Control District Operations and Surveillance Report January 2019

March 2017 Animal Care Conference, Sacramento, CA

Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District. Update to the Town of San Anselmo May 9, 2017

Guess Who s s Coming to Dinner? (The neighbors are simply wild.)

Wes Watson and Charles Apperson

ZOONOTIC ALERT What is zoonosis and why should you care? FECAL TESTING = INTESTINAL PARASITE SCREEN

2017 REPORT OF VECTOR CONTROL ACTIVITIES

Below is a table listing common zoonoses that wildlife rehabbers may see at their facilities with causes and preventative measures.

RABIES PROPHYLAXIS REQUIREMENT FOR DVM STUDENTS

Running head: PLAGUE: WHAT EVERY NURSE NEEDS TO KNOW 1

U.S. ORIGIN HEALTH CERTIFICATE FOR EXPORT OF RESEARCH RODENTS TO JAPAN

RABIES CONTROL INTRODUCTION

Ecology of Zoonotic Diseases Figuring out the What, Where and When of Disease Outbreaks

FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Bailey's Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi)

Zoonoses in West Texas. Ken Waldrup, DVM, PhD Texas Department of State Health Services

An Introduction To A Few Of The Most Common Diseases Found In Mammals

Managing Animal Waste in Public Parks & Conservation Land. Randy Mickley USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services March 30, 2011

Mammalogy 4764 Lab Practical page 1 Name Key

Approximately 220 species of wild mammals occur in California and the

Alameda County Vector Control Services District. Our Mission: Prevention of Vector Borne Disease in Alameda County

Congratulations. on your new Puppy/Dog!

FRINGED MYOTIS. Evaluation Species. Myotis thysanodes

Santa Clara County Vector Control District Operations and Surveillance Report February 2018

A Guide for FL WATCH Camera Trappers

Siphonaptera (fleas) of the Nevada Test Site

Minnesota_mammals_Info_12.doc 11/20/09 -- DRAFT Page 36 of 42

Health Risks from Pet Wild Animals

We Check Your Pets For Internal Parasites

Each animal species exhibits different rabies symptoms.

Feline and Canine Internal Parasites

Mammal Identification In Ontario. Niagara College Fauna Identification Course # ENVR9259

Schweiz / Suisse / Svizzera / Switzerland

Hantavirus: An Emerging or Endemic Infection?

Stark County Rabies Prevention Information Manual

Lab 5: Rodentia and Lagomorpha

HEALTH (or ZOOSANITARY or VETERINARY) CERTIFICATION. Name and address of the government authority of the exporting country :

Canine and Feline Distemper. Description. The following chart indicates the animals which are susceptible to infection by canine and feline distemp

Questions and Answers about Rabies

New York State Mammals. Order Lagomorpha Order Rodentia

McLEOD VETERINARY HOSPITAL. Your. New Puppy

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

04/02/2013. Parasites and breeding dogs: These parasites we don t hear so much about. Main internal parasites found in breeding kennels

What s Bugging You? Mosquitoes and ticks SAMPLE

HANTAVIRUS IN RODENTS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY IN RELATION TO THE EL NIÑO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO) A Thesis. Presented to the.

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

Vertebrate Pest Management

Risk Considerations for Field Work with Common Vertebrate Species in Virginia

Providing Public Health Recommendations to Clinicians for Rabies Post Exposure Prophylaxis. Fall 2014

Zoonoses - Current & Emerging Issues

Clinical Practice Guidelines

Cambridge Public Schools Administrative Guidelines and Procedures ANIMALS IN THE CLASSROOM

Human Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Animal Rabies in Ontario,

A CAREER IN VETERINARY MEDICINE

Fight The Bite. Mosquito Control on Woodlots. Introduction and Overview. History. Vector. Mosquitoes and Flies

Central Florida Invasive Mammals

Plague In Black Tailed Prairie Dogs: Implications For Management At Thunder Basin National Grassland

Multiple Species Certification

Canine Core Vaccines

The Rat Lungworm Lifecycle

The Increase and Spread of Mosquito Borne Diseases. Deidre Evans

New Jersey Department of Health Rabies Background and Technical Information

Appendix D. Texas mammals including those found in four urban centers and in other states. (Courtesy of Cassandra LaFleur) Texas Mammals Scientific

Welcome to Pathogen Group 9

University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report

Fleas associated with the northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) in Elbert County, Colorado

Bites and Claw Scratches:

Michele Stanton, M.S. Kenton County Extension Agent for Horticulture. Asian Longhorned Beetle Eradication Program Amelia, Ohio

What do these diseases have in common?

Any animal contact that may result in rabies must be reported to the Thunder Bay District Health Unit.

3/20/2017. Medical Importance of Pest Management. Shane McCoy Entomologist. Agenda. Introduction

Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Animal Identification. Compiled by Lindsay Magill March 2017

Snowshow Hare, Flying Squirrel, Mouse, Insects Beaver, Snowshow Hare, Flying Squirrel, Mouse, Weasel, Caribou

Proceedings of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association Sydney, Australia 2007

Transcription:

Annual Report Zoonotic Infectious Disease Surveillance 2006 Environmental Health Division Special Programs Section

Introduction: The Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD), Environmental Health Division, conducts routine surveillance of local wild animals for diseases communicable to humans. These diseases include rabies, plague, hantavirus, Bartonella, and raccoon roundworm. This report details the type of animals and insects tested, and the results from the surveillance activities conducted in 2006. In 2006, SNHD implemented a Geographical Information System (GIS) into tracking locations of zoonotic disease surveillance activities. Field staff, equipped with Global Positioning Systems (GPS), entered field data into a desktop GIS system. This data has been plotted onto maps and supplements the numeric tables throughout this report. Mosquito-borne viruses are addressed in a separate report entitled West Nile Virus Surveillance and Mosquito Control and are not reviewed in this report. Rabies Surveillance: Rabies is a disease of the nervous system caused by a virus. It usually results from an exposure to an animal with rabies and is fatal almost 100% of the time to humans. In 2006, SNHD submitted 93 specimens from seven (7) animal species to the Nevada State Department of Agriculture, Animal Disease Lab (ADL) for rabies surveillance, with four (4) bats testing positive. Animal samples were collected by Animal Control agencies in Clark County and submitted to SNHD for recording and shipment to the ADL. Figure 1 details the type of specimens submitted for rabies testing in 2006. Figure 2 is a year-by-year comparison of rabies test submissions since 2001. Map 1 shows the geographical distribution of the positive rabies samples since 2002. No human cases of rabies infection have been reported to SNHD. Figure 1: 2006 Rabies Surveillance Submissions Animal # Sampled # Positive Bat 24 4 Cat 33 0 Dog 32 0 Gopher 1 0 Fox 1 0 Mouse 1 0 Rat 1 0 TOTAL 93 4 Figure 2: 2001 2006 Rabies Test Submission Comparison Year Total Sampled # of Bats # Positive Bats 2001 156 17 4 bats 2002 138 22 4 bats 2003 128 13 1 bat 2004 155 20 4 bats 2005 140 19 7 bats 2006 93 24 4 bats TOTAL 810 115 24 (21%) 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 1 -

Map 1: Positive Rabies Samples 2002-2006 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 2 -

Hantavirus Surveillance: Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a serious respiratory disease transmitted by infected rodents through urine, droppings, or saliva. Humans can contract the disease when they breathe in aerosolized fecal matter or urine containing the virus. In 2006, SNHD submitted 386 blood samples to the University of New Mexico for hantavirus analysis. Samples were collected by SNHD. Of 386 animal samples, 11 Deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), three (3) Cactus mice (Peromyscus eremicus), and two (2) Piñon mouse (Peromyscus truei) were positive for hantavirus. The hantavirus positive animals were collected in the Spring Mountain Range, Mt. Charleston and in the Desert National Wildlife Refuge. Figure 3 details the type and numbers of animals tested for hantavirus. Figure 4 is a year-byyear comparison of hantavirus test submissions since 2001. Map 2 shows the spatial distribution of hantavirus sample collections in Clark County. In 2006 there was one (1) human case of hantavirus in Nevada, however no human cases of hantavirus infection have been reported in Clark County. Figure 3: Hantavirus Specimen Distribution Species Name # Sampled for Hantavirus # Hantavirus Positive Peromyscus maniculatus Deer Mouse 74 11 Peromyscus eremicus Cactus Mouse 50 3 Peromyscus boyli Brush Mouse 46 0 Neotoma albigula White-throated Wood Rat 38 0 Peromyscus truei Piñon Mouse 40 2 Rattus rattus Roof rat 37 0 Dipodomys merriami Merriam's Kangaroo Rat 30 0 Perognathus formosus Long Tail Pocket Mouse 30 0 Reithrodontomys megalotis Western Harvest Mouse 13 0 Neotoma lepida Desert Wood Rat 11 0 Ammospermophilus leucurus White-tailed Antelope Squirrel 6 0 Peromyscus crinitis Canyon Mouse 6 0 Prognathus penicillatus Desert Pocket Mouse 2 0 Mus musculus House Mouse 1 0 Dipodomys deserti Desert Kangaroo Rat 1 0 Microdipodops pallidus Pale Kangaroo Mouse 1 0 TOTAL 386 16 (4%) Figure 4: 2001 2006 Hantavirus Test Submission Comparison Year Samples Tested Total 2001 0 0 2002 0 0 2003 50 4 2004 0 0 2005 128 0 2006 386 12 Total 564 16 Deer Mouse Cactus Mouse Western Harvest Mouse Pinon Mouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 1 8 3 4 1 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 3 -

Map 2: Hantavirus Sample Distribution 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 4 -

Plague Surveillance: Plague is caused by a bacterium, Yersinia pestis, which is carried by fleas that feed on infected animals. In 2006, SNHD submitted 459 animal blood samples to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for plague analysis. Samples were collected by USDA Wildlife Services personnel or SNHD. Out of the 459 animals sampled, three (3) Gray Foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) were positive for plague. The plague positive fox samples were collected on Mt. Charleston. Figure 5 details the type and numbers of animals tested for plague. Additionally, 329 fleas were combed from rodents, with one (1) Malaraeus sinomus testing positive for plague. Figure 6 details the type and numbers of fleas submitted for plague analysis. Figure 7 is a year-by-year comparison of plague test submissions since 2001. Map 1 shows the spatial distribution of plague sample collections in Clark County. No human cases of plague infection have been reported to SNHD. Figure 5: Plague Specimen Distribution # Sampled for Plague Plague Results Received Plague Positive Results # Animals With Fleas 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 5 - Fleas Positive Results Species Name Peromyscus maniculatus Deer Mouse 74 49 0 7 0 Peromyscus eremicus Cactus Mouse 42 15 0 19 1 Peromyscus boylii Brush Mouse 43 52 0 13 0 White-throated Wood Neotoma albigula Rat 37 13 0 22 0 Peromyscus truei Piñon Mouse 40 9 0 0 0 Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus auduboni Rabbit 39 39 0 0 0 Rattus rattus Roof Rat 38 25 0 1 0 Merriam's Kangaroo Dipodomys merriami Rat 34 8 0 6 0 Long Tail Pocket Perognathus formosus Mouse 26 0 0 0 0 Procyon lotor Raccoon 22 22 0 0 0 Reithrodontomys megalotis Western Harvest Mouse 11 0 0 1 0 Canis latrans Coyote 12 12 0 0 0 Neotoma lepida Desert Wood Rat 8 6 0 0 0 Ammospermophilus leucurus White-tailed Antelope Squirrel 6 3 0 6 0 Peromyscus crinitus Canyon Mouse 5 0 0 0 0 Felis felis Domestic Cat 5 5 0 0 0 Lepus californicus Jack Rabbit 4 0 0 0 0 Perognathus penicillatus Desert Pocket Mouse 1 0 0 0 0 Urocyon cinereoargenteus Gray Fox 3 3 3 0 0 Castor canadensis Beaver 2 2 0 0 0 Mus musculus House Mouse 2 0 0 1 0 Dipodomys microps bonnevillei Chisel Tooth Kangaroo Rat 1 0 0 0 0 Spilogale gracilis Civit Cat (skunk) 1 0 0 0 0 Dipodomys deserti Desert Kangaroo Rat 1 0 0 0 0 Microdipodops pallidus Pale Kangaroo Mouse 1 0 0 0 0 Spermophilus variegatus Rock Squirrel 1 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 459 264* 3 76 1 *Additional sample results are pending from the CDC Plague Laboratory

Figure 6: Flea Specimen Distribution Flea Species # Sampled # Positive Orchopeas sexdentatus 146 0 Thrassis bacchi 60 0 Malaraeus sinomus 26 1 Thrassis arizonensis 17 0 Orchopeas leucopus 20 0 Meringis dipodomys 15 0 Peromyscopsylla hesperomys 13 0 Aetheca wagneri 19 0 Malaraeus telchinus 6 0 Hystrichopsylla dippei 2 0 Eumolpianus eumolpi 2 0 Catallagia decipiens 1 0 Epitidea wemmani 1 0 Hoplopsyllus anomalus 1 0 TOTAL 329 1 Figure 7: 2001 2006 Plague Sample Distribution Year Samples # Positive 2001 116 12 2002 25 0 2003 84 7 2004 84 3 2005 128 0 2006 459 3* Total 896 25(2.8%) Gray Fox Raccoon Feral Cat Palmers Chipmunk 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 17 5 2 1 *Additional sample results are pending from the CDC Plague Laboratory 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 6 -

Map 3: Plague Sample Distribution 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 7 -

Bartonella Surveillance: Bartonella henselae is a bacterium that causes cat scratch fever, an animal disease communicable to man. In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) tested 105 Clark County rodent blood samples for Bartonella, identifying the bacteria in 28 of the samples (27%). Figure 8 details the type and numbers of rodents tested by the CDC for Bartonella. Figure 9 is a year-by-year comparison of Bartonella sp. test submissions since 2001. In 2001 there was one (1) human case of Bartonella in Nevada, however, no human cases of Bartonella infection have been reported in Clark County. Figure 8: Bartonella Specimen Distribution Species Name # Sampled for Bartonella # Positive for Bartonella Peromyscus maniculatus Deer Mouse 32 8 Peromyscus truei Pinon Mouse 24 9 Perognathus formosus Long Tail Pocket Mouse 14 6 Reithrodontomys megalotis Western Harvest Mouse 11 2 Neotoma albigula White-throated Wood Rat 9 0 Peromyscus eremicus Cactus Mouse 8 2 Neotoma lepida Desert Wood Rat 4 0 Ammospermophilus leucurus White-tailed Antelope Squirrel 1 0 Dipodomys merriami Merriams's Kangaroo Rat 1 0 Perognathus penicillatus Desert Pocket Mouse 1 1 TOTAL 105 28 (27%) Figure 9: 2000 2006 Bartonella Sample Distribution Year # Sampled for Bartonella # Positive for Bartonella 2000 26 7 2001 0 0 2002 0 0 2003 50 0 2004 0 0 2005 0 0 2006 105 28 Total 181 35 (19%) 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 8 -

Raccoon Roundworm Surveillance: Baylisascaris procyonis is a roundworm that lives in the intestines of raccoons. The worm does not harm the raccoon, but can cause serious illness in humans. The adult worms shed millions of microscopic eggs that are passed in the raccoon's feces. These eggs are resistant to most environmental conditions, and with adequate water, can survive from months to years. People become infected with Baylisascaris when they ingest eggs which are in soil, water, or on objects that have been contaminated with raccoon feces. When humans ingest these eggs, they hatch into larvae in the person's intestine and migrate throughout the body, affecting the organs and muscles. In 2004, SNHD and USDA Wildlife Services collaborated to collect and submit raccoon fecal samples to the ADL for Baylicascaris analysis. Since 2004, the ADL has identified Baylisascaris as well as other roundworm species including Capillaria sp., Trichursis sp., and Toxocara sp. from raccoon fecal matter in Clark County. In response to identifying roundworm in raccoon fecal samples, SNHD developed a health fact sheet available on www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org and provides information on Baylisascaris at the annual University of Nevada Pesticide Applicator Certification training and other Zoonotic Disease seminars. In 2006, SNHD submitted 23 raccoon fecal samples to the ADL for Baylisascaris testing, of which two (2) samples were positive for Baylisascaris and two (2) samples were positive for Capillaria. Figure 10 is a year-by-year comparison of raccoon roundworm submissions since 2004. No human cases of Baylisascaris infection have been reported to SNHD. Figure 10: 2004 2006 Raccoon Parasite Distribution Year # Raccoon Fecals Sampled # Roundworm Present 2004 16 3 2005 17 5 2006 23 4 Total 56 11 (20%) # Baylisiscaris Present # Capillaria Present # Trichursis Present # Toxocara canis Present 2 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 6 3 2 1 Conclusion: Zoonotic diseases such as rabies, plague, hantavirus, Bartonella, and raccoon roundworm are present in wild animal populations in Southern Nevada. An integral component of the zoonotic disease surveillance program is SNHD s involvement with public health education outreach. Outreach was accomplished throughout the year, using formal and informal methods including media interviews, community group presentations, health fair booths, and citizen contact through field activities The Environmental Health Division continues to develop and expand its Zoonotic Infectious Disease Surveillance program, identifying areas of endemic disease and looking for emerging pathogens. 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 9 -

2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Collaborators: Southern Nevada Health District: Environmental Health Division Glenn D. Savage, REHS, Environmental Health Director Steve Goode, REHS, Environmental Health Manager Daniel Maxson, REHS, Environmental Health Supervisor (retired) Mark Bergtholdt, MPH, REHS, Environmental Health Supervisor Richard Hicks, BCE, REHS, Environmental Health Consultant Vivek Raman, REHS, Senior Environmental Health Specialist Brad Gore, REHS, Environmental Health Specialist II Phil Bondurant, Environmental Health Specialist I Jonathan Gore, Environmental Health Specialist I Ignacio Leycegui, Environmental Health Specialist I Timothy Ripp, Environmental Health Specialist I Public Information Office Jennifer Sizemore, Public Information Manager Stephanie Bethel, Public Information Officer Julie Hurd, Publication Specialist United States Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services Las Vegas Valley Water District Desert National Wildlife Refuge Nevada Department of Agriculture Animal Disease and Food Safety Laboratory, Reno Washoe County District Health Department Vector-Borne Diseases Program Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colorado University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 2006 Zoonotic Disease Surveillance Report - 10 -