Bactericidal and Bacteriostatic Action of Chloramphenicol

Similar documents
Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin

Bactericidal versus Bacteriostatic Antibiotic Therapy

available. and P. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin by standardized disk testing (1) in the Microbiology Laboratory

Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates

University, New York, New York Received for publication 7 May was measured by the broth dilution method as previously

Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci

Discrepancy Between Carbenicillin and Ampicillin Activities Against Enterococci and Listeria

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Synergy Between Cephalosporin and Aminoglycoside

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci

Tel: Fax:

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

Activity of Three Aminoglycosides and Two Penicillins Against

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

Brief reports. Decreased susceptibility to imipenem among penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Effeet on Bacterial Growth

Mechanism of Chloramphenicol-Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae

Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing

Chapter 51. Clinical Use of Antimicrobial Agents

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Disk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin

BACTERIOLOGY OF THE HEALTHY CONJUNCTIVA*

Synergism, Killing Kinetics, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Principles in antimicrobial therapy: The ABCs

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

with Other Orally Administered Drugs

TOLYPOMYCIN, A NEW ANTIBIOTIC. V IN VITRO AND IN VIVO ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY. Masahiro Kondo, Tokiko Oishi and Kanji Tsuchiya

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

Vaccination as a potential strategy to combat Antimicrobial Resistance in the elderly

In Vitro Susceptibility of Brucella

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Antimicrobials & Resistance

R-factor mediated trimethoprim resistance: result of two three-month clinical surveys

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

ANTIBIOTICS USED FOR RESISTACE BACTERIA. 1. Vancomicin

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Susceptibility Tests for Methicillin-Resistant (Heteroresistant) Staphylococci

Evaluation of MicroScan MIC Panels for Detection of

Received 5 February 2004/Returned for modification 16 March 2004/Accepted 7 April 2004

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli

11/10/2016. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Disclosures. Educational Need/Practice Gap. Objectives. Case #1

Empiric Treatment of Sepsis. Professor of Clinical Microbiology Department of Microbiology Leicester University U. K.

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

Susceptibility and Synergy Studies of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

In Vitro Activity of Piperacillin, a New Semisynthetic Penicillin with an Unusually Broad Spectrum of Activity

Comparison of the Inhibitory and Bactericidal Activity of Aztreonam and Amikacin Against Gram Negative Aerobic Bacilli

CHAPTER 18 THE COCCI OF MEDICAL IMPORTANCE. Learning Objectives

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Performance Information. Vet use only

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

Inhibiting Microbial Growth in vivo. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Zeina Alkudmani

MICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ

Staphylococcus aureus with the Disc

JAC Linezolid against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant pneumococci in the rabbit meningitis model

Factors affecting plate assay of gentamicin

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

Antibiotics in Gram-Negative Infections

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Susceptibility Testing

Antibacterial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial agents. are chemicals active against microorganisms

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

Bacterial Resistance of Respiratory Pathogens. John C. Rotschafer, Pharm.D. University of Minnesota

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

Medical bacteriology Lecture 8. Streptococcal Diseases

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

Protein Synthesis Inhibitors

Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to

Pharm 262: Antibiotics. 1 Pharmaceutical Microbiology II DR. C. AGYARE

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Fig. 1. Bactericidal effect of guinea-pig complement against E. coil NIHJ JC-2, P. aeruginosa 18 S and S. aureus 209 P

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

DETERMINING CORRECT DOSING REGIMENS OF ANTIBIOTICS BASED ON THE THEIR BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY*

Transcription:

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, JUly 1979, p. 13-18 66-484/79/7-13/6$2./ Vol. 16, No. 1 Bactericidal and Bacteriostatic Action of Chloramphenicol Against Meningeal Pathogens JAMES J. RAHAL, JR.,'* AND MICHAEL S. SIMBERKOFF2 Infectious Disease Division, Medical Service, New York (Manhattan) Veterans Administration Hospital, New York, New York 11,' and Department ofmedicine, New York University School ofmedicine, New York, New York 1162 Received for publication 1 April 1979 The bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, tetracycline, and sulfisoxazole were compared against several potential meningeal pathogens. Chloramphenicol is bactericidal at clinically achievable concentrations against Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcuspneumoniae, and Neisseria meningitidis. It is bacteriostatic against gram-negative bacilli of the farnily Enterobacteriaceae and against Staphylococcus aureus. Chloramphenicol has proven highly efficacious in the treatment of bacterial meningitis caused by those organisms against which it is bactericidal at low concentrations. Because leukocytic phagocytosis in the subarachnoid space is inefficient, we propose that bactericidal activity in cerebrospinal fluid is important for optimal therapy of bacterial meningitis. Chloramphenicol does not provide such activity in meningitis caused by enteric gram-negative bacilli. Chloramphenicol has assumed an increasingly important role in the therapy of pyogenic meningitis. It is considered the drug of choice for meningitis due to ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae and for pneumococcal and meningococcal meningitis in patients allergic to penicillin. Recently, enteric gram-negative bacfilary meningitis has been noted more frequently among adults undergoing neurosurgical procedures and in those with debilitating disease (7). Antibiotic susceptibility of these pathogens is often limited to chloramphenicol and aminoglycosides. When chloramphenicol susceptibility is known, this drug has been favored as the treatment of choice because of its greater penetrability from serum to cerebrospinal fluid (11). To evaluate the potential efficacy of chloramphenicol against meningitis due to gram-negative bacilli, we have compared the bacteriostatic and bactericidal action of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, tetracycline, and sulfisoxazole against the more common meningeal pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and H. influenzae) and against enteric gramnegative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial pathogens, with the exception of meningococci, were obtained from clinical specimens and identified by standard microbiological techniques. Emil Gotschlich of Rockefeller University provided 1 strains of N. meningitidis. Tube dilution sensitivity studies were carried out with Mueller-Hinton broth 13 and an inoculum of 15 organisms per ml. One-half milliliter of inoculum was added to.5 ml of each antibiotic dilution, and the suspensions were incubated for 18 h at 37C. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic preventing visible turbidity. All clear tubes were subcultured with a calibrated loop (.1 ml) onto antibiotic-free agar for 18 h at 37 C. The minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was defined as that yielding growth of fewer than five colonies (>99% killing). Supplement C (2.5%, Difco) was added for determination of H. influenzae susceptibility. Quantitative studies of bacterial killing rates were performed with 2-mi suspensions containing 15 organisms per ml. Aliquots of.1 ml were removed at timed intervals, and colony-forming units were counted by the standard plate dilution technique. RESULTS Eleven strains of H. influenzae, 1 strains of S. pneumoniae, and 1 strains of N. meningitidis were tested for their bacteriostatic and bactericidal susceptibility to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and tetracycline. Susceptibility of the N. meningitidis strains to sulfisoxazole was also tested. Against H. influenzae, the MIC of chloramphenicol was at least twofold lower than that of ampicillin for 1 of 11 strains. The MBC of chloramphenicol was at least twofold lower than that of ampicillin for six strains and equal to that of ampicillin for four strains. In general, bactericidal activity of chloramphenicol occurred at concentrations comparable to those at

14 RAHAL AND SIMBERKOFF which ampicillin was bacteriostatic. Tetracycline, at clinically achievable concentrations, demonstrated only bacteriostatic activity against most strains (Fig. 1). In contrast to H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae were severalfold more susceptible to the bactericidal action of ampicillin than to that of chloramphenicol. Nevertheless, the MICs and MBCs of chloramphenicol were not widely separate for most strains, and nine of ten were killed by the clinically achievable concentration of 6.25,ug/ ml. The MICs and MBCs for tetracycline differed by four- to eightfold among susceptible strains, but several strains were highly resistant to both the bacteriostatic and the bactericidal activities of this antibiotic (Fig. 2). Meningococci, like pneumococci, were more susceptible to ampicillin than to chloramphenicol, but the latter drug again exhibited bactericidal activity against most isolates at clinically achievable concentrations (Fig. 3). Six of ten isolates were killed by 6.25 tig or less per ml, and the MBC for three others was 12.5,ug/ml. All strains were inhibited by less than 1.56,ug of tetracycline per ml, but only three were killed by 6.25,ug/ml. Thus, tetracycline was essentially bacteriostatic for the majority of meningococci. Sulfisoxazole demonstrated bactericidal activity at 62.5,ig/ml against six of ten meningococcal strains, indicating susceptibility at clinically achievable concentrations. The remaining four were sulfonamide resistant, requiring 31.2 to 62.5,Ig/ml for inhibition and 25 to 5,ug/ml for bactericidal activity. In contrast to the bactericidal action of chlor- ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. amphenicol at low concentrations against H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, and N. meningitidis, studies with a variety ofenterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated only bacteriostatic activity against almost all strains (Table 1). Members of the family Neisseriaceae other than N. meningitidis, namely, Acinetobacter, Moraxella, and N. catarrhalis, were variably susceptible to the bactericidal effect of low concentrations of chloramphenicol. Acinetobacter were not killed by such concentrations, whereas N. catarrhalis and a single Moraxella isolate were susceptible. A strain of Cardiobacterium hominis isolated from the blood of a patient with endocarditis was killed by 1.56 jig of chloramphenicol per ml (Table 2). Quantitative kinetic studies with a single strain of H. influenzae demonstrated almost identical rates of killing by 1.56 jg of chloramphenicol or ampicillin per ml against an inoculum of 15 organisms per ml (Fig. 4). With inocula of 12 to 16 organisms per ml, the MIC and MBC of chloramphenicol against H. influenzae showed no significant change. With 17 organisms per nu, the MBC also remained within clinically achievable concentrations. DISCUSSION Alexander et al., in 1949, described the rapidly lethal effect of chloramphenicol against H. influ- Nevertheless, chloramphenicol, because of its inability to sterilize cultures of staphylococci and enteric bacilli at concentrations below 5 jig/ml, is generally described as a bacteriostatic antibi- enzae at a concentration of 1 Ag/ml (1). z)8-, 6- : X 4- z - CONCENTRATION OF ANTIBIOTIC Mg/mI FIG. 1. Bactericidal activity of chloramphenicol against H. influenzae compared with those of ampicillin and tetracycline. Interrupted lines represent cumulative MICs and solid lines represent cumulative MBCs against 11 strains.

VOL. 16, 1979 BACTERICIDAL ACTION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL 15 (I) z - U) U. co La' 2 CONCENTRATION OF ANTIBIOTIC ug/mi PIG. 2. Bactericidal activity of chloramphenicol against S. pneumoniae compared with those of ampicillin and tetracycline. zb Interrupted lines represent cumulative i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MICs and solid lines represent cumulative MBCs against 1 strains. 1 /'. U)6*,, U.NR I OTC FIG. /N 1- z8 fso.j <. 1.9 7. 3212'O 2-~~~~~~~~~~-.9.19.33.98s 1.56 3i2 6.25 12.'5 25 5 >1 Sulfisoxcozol <.9 1L9 7.8 31.2 125 115 CONCENTRATION OF ANTIBIOTIC ug/mi FIG. 3. Bactericidal activity of chloramphenicol against N.meningitidis compared with those of ampicillin, tetracycline, and sulfisoxazole. Interrupted lines represent cumulative MICs and solid lines represent cumulative MBCs against 1 strains. otic. These divergent effects of the same antibiotic against different bacterial species reaffirm the concept that antibiotics cannot be broadly classified as bacteriostatic or bactericidal on the basis of their activity against selected microbial strains. For clinical purposes, the relationship between the antibiotic concentration required to kill >99% of a bacterial population in 24 h and that concentration which can be achieved in body fluids represents a more useful definition of "bactericidal" activity for a specific drug against a specific organism. In essence, each antibacterial agent possesses finite "bacteriostatic" and bactericidal concentration ranges which differ against various bacteria. Agents such as the penicillins and cephalosporins are considered bactericidal because inhibitory and lethal concentrations are almost identical against most susceptible organisms. Enterococci are exceptional because they are not uniformly killed by low concentrations of penicillin. Recently, certain strains of Staphylococcal aureus have proven resistant to the lethal action of semisynthetic penicillins and susceptible only to their inhibitory effect (12). The data we have presented indicate that the antibacterial action of chloramphenicol (as well as of tetracycline and sulfisoxazole in some instances) cannot be broadly characterized as bacteriostatic against all organisms. Thus, if one defines the bactericidal concentrations of chloramphenicol as a miniimal lethal concentration which can be

16 PtAHAL AND SIMBERKOFF ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. TABLE 1. Bacteriostatic susceptibility ofenterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus to chloramphenicol Organism MIC (Ag/mi) MBC (ug/mi) E. coli 1.9 25 Salnonella (2 strains).9, 1.9 62.5, >5 Klebsiella (3 strains).1, 1.9, 1.9 15.6, 25, >5 Enterobacter (2 strains) 3.9,7.8 >5, >5 Serratia (3 strains) 3.9,15.6,31.2 >5, >5, >5 Proteus 3.9 >5 Providencia (2 strains) 15.6,15.6 62.5, >5 Staphylococcus aureus (6 strains) 3.12-12.5 25->5 TABLE 2. Variable bacteriostatic and bactericidal susceptibility of Neisseriaceae and a single strain of Cardiobacterium hominis to chloramphenicol Organim MIC (g/mi) MBC (pg/ml) Acinetobacter (4 strains) 3.1, 6.2, 5, >5 25, >25, >5, >5 Neisseria catarrhalis (2 strains).78,3.1.78,6.2 Moraxella.78.78 Cardiobacterium hominis.78 1.56 7E w zc, 18 - /y ~~~~~~~~AM.39,ug/ml _ se 14 < ~ -_ CM.39uge/rm d 12 AM 1.56gg/ml 3 6 24 HOURS OF INCUBATION FIG. 4. Comparative rate of bactericidal activities of chloramphenicol (CM) and ampicillin (AM) against a susceptible strain of H. influenzae (MBC, 1.56 pg/ml). achieved in most body fluids (15 to 6 yig/ml), then this drug is bactericidal against most strains of H. influenzae, pneumococcus, and meningococcus but bacteriostatic against Staphylococcus auweus and enteric gram-negative bacilli. Whether such variable antibacterial effects against different species are due to separate biochemical actions remains to be determined. These considerations hold important therapeutic implications for infections which require treatment with bactericidal antimicrobial agents. Bacterial endocarditis is a widely accepted example because of the paucity of phagocytic leukocytes in infected cardiac vegetations. Deficient phagocytosis of bacteria at the site of infection thus mandates lethal antibiotic activity for cure. In bacterial meningitis, an abundance of phagocytic leukocytes usually appears in the cerebrospinal fluid. However, the number of viable bacteria rapidly rises to approximately 17 organisms per ml, suggesting relatively inefficient leukocytic phagocytosis (4). In 1946, Wood and his associates postulated a state of inefficient phagocytosis of pneumococci in meningitis due to the lack of type-specific antibody in the early stages of infection (18). Petersdorf et al.

VOL. 16, 1979 BACTERICIDAL ACTION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL 17 later confirmed the poor phagocytic function of meningeal leukocytes against encapsulated pneumococci in dogs (1), whereas O'Toole and colleagues documented the absence of specific antipneumococcal opsonic antibody in most cases of pneumococcal meningitis studied (18). It appears now that early phagocytosis of pneumococci and other encapsulated organisms is dependent upon nonspecific, heat-labile, complement-mediated opsonization (13, 14). Complement activity in normal and infected spinal fluid is either undetectable or present in concentrations which represent small fractions of those in serum (3, 6, 17). Thus, absent or minimal concentrations of specific antibody and complement in spinal fluid may explain the inefficient phagocytosis and strikingly high populations of bacteria found in the subarachnoid space of patients with purulent meningitis. These factors suggest that bacterial meningitis, like endocarditis, requires bactericidal antibiotic activity for optimal therapy. That chloramphenicol and sulfonamides have been highly succsssful in the therapy of purulent meningitis would argue against this hypothesis if these drugs were universally bacteriostatic. Our data indicate that chloramphenicol is bactericidal for the three major meningeal pathogens against which it has been consistently successful and that sulfonamides are bactericidal against susceptible strains of meningococci. It is of interest that recent studies by Brotherton et al. (2), Turk (16), Paredes et al. (9), and Feldman (5) have demonstrated low MBCs of chloramphenicol against H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae. The possible requirement for bactericidal antibiotic activity in purulent meningitis raises a question regarding the role of chloramphenicol in the treatment of meningitis due to gram-negative enteric bacilli against which this antibiotic is only bacteriostatic at clinically achievable concentrations. The use of chloramphenicol for gram-negative bacillary meningitis in adults has not been highly successful despite its excellent diffusion into cerebrospinal fluid. Resistance has developed during therapy in 3% of the strains in one series (Z. A. McGee, A. B. Kaiser, C. Rubens, and W. E. Farrar, Jr., Program Abstr. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 17th, New York, N.Y., Abstr. no. 4, 1977). This lesser efficacy of chloramphenicol in gram-negative enteric bacillary meningitis as compared with H. influenzae, pneumococcal, and meningococcal meningitis may be due to host factors as well as antibiotic activity. Nevertheless, Sande and co-workers have provided instructive data in a well-defined rabbit model which compares the action of chloramphenicol in two types of meningitis. In a study of H. influenzae meningitis, chloramphenicol and the combination of ampicillin plus chloramphenicol cleared the spinal fluid of viable organisms as rapidly as ampicillin alone (J. Bodine, T. Murray, and M. A. Sande, Clin. Res. 25: 27A, 1977). These findings are consistent with Feldman's in vitro studies which demonstrate that chloramphenicol does not antagonize the bactericidal activity of ampicillin against H. influenzae (5). In contrast, bacterial counts in spinal fluid of experimental Proteus meningitis remained constant after chloramphenicol therapy, indicating a bacteriostatic effect. Furthermore, bacteriostatic activity resulted from the combination of chloramphenicol and gentamicin, indicating antagonism of gentamicin by chloramphenicol (15). In conclusion, chloramphenicol is bactericidal in clinically achievable concentrations against certain meningeal pathogens against which it has proven highly efficacious. This supports the concept that bactericidal activity in cerebrospinal fluid is important for optimal therapy because of inefficient phagocytosis in the subarachnoid space. Chloramphenicol does not provide such activity when used for the therapy of meningitis due to gram-negative enteric bacilli. ACKNOWL,EDGMENTS This work was supported by the Veterans Administration. Kathy Kagan and Nancy Moldover provided technical assistance. LITERATURE CITED 1. Alexander, H. E., G. Leidy, and W. Redman. 1949. Comparison of the action of streptomycin, polymyxin B, aureomycin and chloromycetin on H. pertussis, H. parapertussis, H. influenzae and five enteric strains of Gram-negative bacilli. J. Clin. Invest. 28:867-87. 2. Brotherton, R., T. Lees, and R. D. Feigin. 1976. Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae type B to cefatrizine, ampiciflin, and chloramphenicol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1:322-324. 3. Cova, J. L, R. P. Propp, and K. D. Barron. 1977. Quantitative relationships of the fourth complement component in human cerebrospinal fluid. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 89:615-621. 4. Feldman, W. E. 1977. Relation of concentrations of bacteria and bacterial antigen in cerebrospinal fluid to prognosis in patients with bacterial meningitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 296:433-435. 5. Feldman, W. E. 1978. Effect of ampicillin and chloramphenicol against Haemophilus influenzae. Pediatrics 61:46-49. 6. Fothergill, L. D. 1935. Observations of the presence of complement in the cerebrospinal fluid in various pathologic conditions of the central nervous system. J. Pediatr. 6:374-381. 7. Mangi, R. J., R. Quintifliami, and V. T. Andriole. 1975. Gram-negative bacillary meningitis. Am. J. Med. 59: 829-835. 8. O'Toole, R. D., G. F. Thornton, M. D. Mukherjee, and K. N. Neogy. 1971. Cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulins in bacterial meningitis: a possible role for antibody in pneumococcal meningitis. Arch. Neurol. 25:218-224. 9. Paredes, A., L H. Taber, M. D. Yow, D. Clark, and W. Nathan. 1976. Prolonged pneumococcal meningitis

18 RAHAL AND SIMBERKOFF due to an organism with increased resistance to penicillin. Pediatrics 58:378-381. 1. Petersdorf, R. G., D. M. Swarner, and M. Garcia. 1963. Studies on the pathogenesis of meningitis. Im. Relationship of phagocytosis to the fall in cerebrospinal fluid sugar in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 61:745-754. 11. Rahal, J. J., Jr. 1972. Treatment of Gram-negative bacilary meningitis in adults. Ann. Intern. Med. 77:295-32. 12. Sabath, L. D., M. Laverdiere, N. Wheeler, D. Blazevic, and B. J. Wilkinson. 1977. A new type of penicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1:443-447. 13. Stephens, C. G., R. C. Williams, Jr., and W. P. Reed. 1977. Classical and altenate complement pathway ac- ANTIMICROB. AGENT8 CHEMOTHER. tivation by pneumococci. Infect. Immun. 17:296-32. 14. Stossel, T. P. 1974. Phagocytosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 29: 717-723, 774-78, 833-839. 15. Strausbaugh, L J., and M. A. Sande. 1978. Factors influencing the therapy of experimental Proteus mirabilis meningitis in rabbits. J. Infect. Dis. 137:261-26. 16. Turk, D. C. 1977. A comparison of chloramphenicol and ampicillin as bactericidal agents for Haemophilw influenzae type B. J. Med. Microbiol. 1:127-131. 17. Whittle, H. C., and B. M. Greenwood. 1977. Cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulins and complement in meningococcal meningitis. J. Clin. Pathol. 3:72-722. 18. Wood, W. B., M. R. Smith, and B. Watson. 1946. Studies on the mechanism of recovery in pneumococcal pneumonia. IV. The mechanism of phagocytosis in the absence of antibody. J. Exp. Med. 84:387-42.