SNAKEBITE MANAGEMENT: Experiences From Gulu Regional Hospital Ugandz

SNAKEBITE MANAGEMENT: Experiences From Gulu Regional Hospital Ugandz Wangoda R. M.Med (Surg) (MUK) Watmon B. MBChB, (MUK) Kisige M. MBChB, (MUK) Correspondence to: Dr. Robert Wangoda, Dept of Surgery, Mulago Hospital, P.O.Box 70 1 Kampala-UGANDA. Background: The objective of this study was to document our experience with supportive therapy without antivenom in snakebite management. Methods: In a prospective study undertaken at Gulu Regional Hospital, Northern Uganda from January to December 00 the outcome of supportive therapy in management of cases of snakebite was assessed. Results: The lower extremity was involved in 106 patients (98.1%) and the upper extremity in the remaining two cases. Sixty-two patients (7.4 %) did not get any First Aid prior to admission. All Patients received supportive therapy. None of the patients received snake antivenom since it was unavailable at the hospital. All the patients (100 %) improved and were discharged. The duration of hospital stay was to 17 days with a mean of 3.8 days. Conclusion: Supportive therapy is simple, safe and effective treatment for snakebite without serious systemic poisoning. Introduction Snakebite is a frightening experience for the patient and is a medical emergency'-. Poisonous snakebite can result in sudden death. Death can also result from shock due to fright (fright deaths) even when the bites were by non-poisonous snakes. Urgent therapeutic measures are therefore very important in the management'-3. Poisonous snakes have a pair of fangs projecting from the maxillae through which venom is injected into the victim during - the bite3-g. Snakes are found throughout most parts of tropics and temperate zones. Non-poisonous snakes have rows of teeth and these distinguishing features are important in the appropriate management of the victims ofsnakebites3. In United States, there are nearly 8000 poisonous snakebite cases per annum with 10-0 death^^.^. Australia, which is another snake-inhabited country, has an annual incidence of about 3000 cases with 1 or deaths. The incidence of snakebite in Uganda is unknown. The mortality rate of untreated poisonous snakebites is as high as 40-0 %. Worldwide there are about 30000-40000 deaths from snakebites per annum. Most deaths occur in children, the elderly, cases of delayed, inadequate or no treatment and religious sects who handle venomous snakes'-6. Non-poisonous snakebites may cause serious infection from bacteria such as clostridium and other anaerobes found in the snake's mouth. Most snakebites follow accidental stepping on the snake by unprotected, bare footed persons. Snakebite poisoning results from effects of venom injection (envenomation) into the victim. Venom can also be absorbed from cuts or scratches. Venom is a complex mixture of toxic and enzymatic proteins. Effects of these toxins include; haemotoxicity-damage to blood vessels resulting in spontaneous systemic bleeding (petechiae, ecchymosis, haematemesis, haematuria, muscle paralysis, myolysis, haemolysis, arrhythmias and heart failure, renal failure from shock or haemoglobinuria. However, in up to 30% of poisonous snakebites envenomation does not occur. This is because poisonous snakes are not always charged with ven~m~*~*'. Manifestations of snakebite poisoning may be local and/or systemic'-'0. Local symptoms and signs include presence of fang marks, local bleeding, local swelling (oedema), bruising or discoloration. Systemic features include persistent or transient hypotension (shock) syncope (fainting), nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, excessive salivation, paralysis, coagulopathy, and systemic haemorrhage. The symptoms are at their worst 1-4 hours.3-s-6 following the bite and this allows for grading of snakebite severity to be done at the end ofthat period. Grading oflevels envenomation can also be done using ELIZAQo determine venom antieen " levels in the ~atients' serum. The level of venomati ltes well v vith symptom severity

and is a good guide to patient management with antivenom, as higher grades require more antiven~m~.~.~. Basic investigations'-' in snakebite include; hll blood counts, blood grouping and cross-matching, prothrombin time, ECG, serum electrolytes, urea, creatinine and where available venom detection from the snakebite wounds, using venom detection kits. The management of snakebite though urgent is controversial1-'o in some aspects. The outcome however depends on the type of the snake and the levels of enven~mation'-~. The mainstay of treatment for snakebite poisoning is antivenom'-lo. However, First Aid in the field or at home is important and should include procedures such as splinting the bitten limb, wound dressing with a firm bandage, reassurance and immediate transport to a medical facility where supportive therapy and antivenom are available. Procedures such as application of a loose tourniquet proximal to the bite, incision and suction of the fang marks and excision of the fang marks are controversial but may be helphl in skilled hands. Ifthe snake is killed it should be identified. Ifit is non-poisonous, reassuring - the patients is important. For less seriously ill victims, general supportive treatment is sufficient1-lo. The aims of this prospective study were to assess:the outcome of supportive therapy in absence ofantivenom in snakebite management at Gulu Regional Hospital. Patients and methods Between January and December 00, there were patients with snakebites admitted at Gulu Regional Hospital in Northern Uganda. The diagnosis was based on the history and/or the presence of fang marks. The patients' ages, sex, place of bite, residential address, time interval between snakebite and admission to hospital, type of First Aid received, symptoms, local and systemic signs of snakebite envenomation, type of treatment given, comp1ira:ions and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Treatment included bed rest, limb elevation, reassurance and sedation with diazepam or promethazine, wound dressing with iodine, antibiotic prophylaxis, tetanus toxoid, analgesics, steroid therapy, observation with or without intravenous fluid administration. No antivenom was administered in all cases being unavailable in the hospital. Patients were discharged on recovery from local and systemic effects of snakebite. Data was analyzed to assess the outcome of supportive treatment. Results During the period under review, there were 170 surgical admissions of which (6.3%) had snakebites distributed throughout the year (Figure 1). The peak incidence was in the month of May. There were 47 males and 61 females (M: F= 1:1.3). The ages ranged from 1 year to 64 years with a mean of 4. years (Table 1). Most of the patients did not receive any First Aid prior to admission. The lower limb was bitten in 106 (98.1%) and the upper limb in (1.9%). None of the victims had protective foot ware at the time of the bite. Table summarizes the presenting clinical features. All patients had fangmarks. While on the ward, wounds were cleaned with iodine or hibitane (0. %). - - - - -- - - - -- Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 00 Figure 1: Monthly distribution of snakebites b z 00 - - - pp - - - -. --. - -

Table 1 : Age Distribution Age in years Up to 10 11-0 1-30 31-40 41-0 1-60 61-70 Total No. of Pts 13 31 3 18 1 YO 1.0 8.7 3.4 16.7 4.6 4.6 1.O 100 Table. Manifestations of Snakebite Clinical Features Fang marks Local swelling (oedema) Local pain Local bleeding Headache Nausea Enlarged regional lymph nodes Abdominal pain Chest pain Visual hallucinations Agitation Local cellulitis No of pts 87 18 13 11 4 7 Table 3. Field First Aid Treatment. First Aid measure Tourniquet Coin coverage of wound Herbal medication Blackstone use None Total No of Pts 17 1 6 6 YO 1.7 19.4.6 1.9 7.4 1 00.0

Table 4. Hospital Treatment - General Supportive Therapy 1. Bed rest. Wound dressing (iodine, hibitane) 1 3. 1 Reassurance 1 4. 1 Sedation (Diazepam, Promethazine). Analgesics (ASA, Paracetamol, Ibuprofen, Indomethacin, Pethidine) 6. Prophylactic antibiotics (PPF, Amoxycillin, Ampicillin, Gentamicin, Cloxacillin) 7. Tetanus Toxoid 8. Steroid (Hvdrocortisone, Dexamethasone) 9. Intravenous access (Fluids and Drugs) 10. Debridement (N = ) 11. Limb Elevation 1. Observation Table 4 shows the supportive treatment given to the snakebite patients. The patients were monitored for any complications. Two patients had wound debridement following cellulitis that caused local tissue necrosis. All the patients improved on treatment and were discharged. The duration of hospital stay ranged and 17 days with an average of 3.8 days. Discussion Snakebite was seen throughout the year but had a peak during the wet and dry seasons, which are the cropping and harvest seasons respectively, when the barefooted peasants ate busy in the snake - inhabited bushy fields in the rural areas6. All age groups were affected but the majority of the victims in our series were adults aged over 0 years. The slightly higher incidence among females is presumably due to the additional risk from outdoor activities such as gardening6, collecting food or firewood from the fields or bushes. Most of our patients had bites in the lower extremity which finding was in agreement with findings by other researcher^'.^. Lack of protective foot-ware like leather boots while in a snake area is a predisposing factor to sr~akebite~.~. All the patients in this study had local manifestation of poisonous snakebite but few had mild lcatuirs of sys~cmic poisoning. Ir. is known that manifestations of snakebite depend on many factors but most importantly on the type of snake and the quantity of venom injected (level of envenomation or grade severity ~fsnakebite)~.~,~. Snake type gives a clue to the venom-type and the nature of clinical manifestation in the victim. If the offending snake was not killed searching for it could probably result in a second bite3v. It is however probable that the quantities of injected venom (levels of envenomation) were low leading to less serious symptoms and signs. Future studies in this aspect of snakebites should be encouraged. The management ofvenomous snakebites is a medical emergency that requires immediate First Aid, general and specific measures'-3. The local traditional First Aid practices like strapping a coin or black stone against the snakebite wound, use of local topical medicaments are unconventional and unreliable and may result in complications. Although First Aid practices such as applying a loose tourniquet proximal to the bite, incision and suction of the wound, may be controversial1-', other practices such as immobilizing the bitten extremity, wound dressing after allowing local bleeding for 1-30 seconds are recommended as is the immediate transport of the victim to the nearest medical facility for definitive therapyg. Preventing exercise or exertion after snakebite minimizes systemic absorption ofven~m~.~,~. Incision and suction of the bite wound for 30 minutes and within 30 minutes of the snakebite may remove up to 0% of the venom. A Loose tourniquet (not arterial) applied within 30 minutes proximal to the bite to obstruct venous and lymphatic flow is

recommended in some series but it should not be kept for more than 4 hours. It should be removed as soon as antivenom is administered. However, the tourniquet should be removed gradually to avoid spilling ofvenom into the circulation. General supportive therapy1-* has been effective in the management of snakebite patients with or without systemic poisoning; the former category of patients will in addition require antivenom treatment1-lo. In this study supportive treatment was simple and only a few patients with systemic symptoms had 1.V access for fluids and drugs for a day. It is possible in this study we did not get any patients with serious systemic poisoning. Presumably due to the snake type involved and perhaps small amount of venom injected. In practice, it is known that only 1 in 0 snakebite patients require active emergency management including antivenom therapyz which is the mainstay of treatment for snakebite with systemic poisoning1-lo. Antivenom is available as monovalent (monospecific) and polyvalent preparations. It is prepared from horse serum and hypersensitivity, including anaphylaxis (incidence is under 1 %) can Antivenom should be administered either in the Emergency Room or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) where there are resuscitation facilitie~~~~.~. A test dose of 0.0 ml of antivenom diluted in 1:100 normal saline is given intradermally, with 0. mg of adrenaline ready in a syringe in case of anaphylaxis. Other series recommend premeditation for antivenom treatment as follows: non-sedating antihistamine e.g. promethazine 0. mg /kg, subcutaneous adrenaline 0. mg and 1.V hydrocortisone mg /kg. Antivenom is given by 1.V drip in 00 mls of normal saline or % Dextrose s10wl~~~~ in not less than 1 hour or by slow push 1.V injection not more than ml / minute. The dose of antivenom is titrated against clinical response. Children get the same dose as adults. Initially 3- ampoules of antivenom will be required, 6-8 ampoules may be required late$. Serum sickness occurs up to 14 days after antivenom treatment and therefore steroid therapy (prednisolone Img/kg) and follow up are advised. Conclusion Snakebites are a public health hazard in Gulu, Northern Uganda. Supportive therapy is simple, safe and effective treatment for snakebites without serious systemic poisoning. Recommendation Although general supportive therapy is effective in less serious snakebites, antivenom should be readily available all the time for administration in cases of systemic snakebite poisoning. - The public should be made aware of the burden of snakebites, their prevention and pre-hospital care. References 1. Gold B.S, Barish R. A. Venomous Snakebite. Current concepts in diagnosis, treatment and management. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am 199; 10: 49-67.. Sutherland S. Death from snakebite in Australia 198 1-1991. Med J Australia, 1991; 7:740-46. 3. Jon. M. Burch Reginald.J. Franciose; Ernest E. Moore: Trauma: Bites and Strings of Animals and Insects: Snakes, in, Principles of Surgery, Eds: Seymour I. Schwartz; G.Tom Shires, John M. Daly et al. McGRAW-HILL, 1999, p 09-1 1. 4. The Merck Manual; General Medicine: Poisoning: Venomous Bites and Strings, 14th edn. Volume 1, Merck and Co; Inc, 198 p 1430-34.. Dreisbach R.H, Rebertson W.O. (Eds): Reptiles: Snakes, in, A Handbook of Poisoning, 1th edn, a LANGE Medical Book, 1987 p467-47. 6. Oslund N.S, Paul S. Auerbach: Disorders caused by Reptiles and Marine animal envenomation, in, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, Fauci, Brauncwald, Isselbacher et al, (Eds), 14th edn. Vol. McGraw-HILL, 1998 p 44-6. 7. Mills K, Morton R, Page I? (Eds): Snakebites, in, A Colour Atlas of Accidents and Emergencies. Wolfe Medical Publications. P9, 14, 31. 8. Turner P, Pearson R.M. Adverse Drug Reactions and Poisoning: Venomous Animals, in, Clinical Medicine, A Textbook for Medical Students and Doctors, Eds, Parveen J. Kumar; Michael L. Clark. Oxford University Press, 1990, p 7-3 9. British National Formulary: Snakebites British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, March 00, Number 43, p9. 10. The Republic of Uganda, Ministry of Health; Snakebites, in, National Standard Treatment Guidelines, 1 st edn, 1993 December. UEDMP, Ministry of Health. p.103.