Via

Similar documents
Title 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE

Referred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Board of Health

As Passed by the House. Regular Session Sub. H. B. No

H 7906 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======= LC02744/SUB A ======= STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D.

As Reported by the Senate Finance Committee. 131st General Assembly Regular Session Sub. S. B. No

ARTICLE FIVE -- ANIMAL CONTROL

Title 6. Animals* Chapters: 6.05 Dangerous Dogs 6-1. * For nuisance provisions regarding animals, see LMC , , and

Library. Order San Francisco Codes. Comprehensive Ordinance List. San Francisco, California

DOG BYLAWS. 3. There will be a late charge per dog for licensing after March 31 st. There will be no exceptions to this requirement.

San Francisco City and County Pit Bull Ordinance

SENATE BILL No AN ACT enacting the Kansas retail pet shop act; establishing the Kansas retail pet shop act fee fund.

ORDINANCE NO. CS-296

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION

(2) "Vicious animal" means any animal which represents a danger to any person(s), or to any other domestic animal, for any of the following reasons:

ORDINANCE NO. 14,951

TITLE 532 BOARD OF COMMERCIAL PET BREEDERS CHAPTER 1 ORGANIZATION, OPERATION, AND PURPOSES

CARE AND USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH, TESTING, AND TEACHING

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Hobby Breeder Permit Application

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 26, 2016

CHAPTER 4 DOG CONTROL

IRS DEFINED NON-PROFIT CANINE RESCUE KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE # WHEREAS, backyard and urban chickens eat noxious weeds and insects; and

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, FLORIDA

SEC BREEDING AND TRANSFER OF DOGS AND CATS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,168, Eff. 5/18/00, Oper. 11/15/00.)

Cuyahoga County Board of Health Animal Venue Regulation

ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2343

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT RE:

CHAPTER 2.26 ANIMAL CONTROL

United States Department of Agriculture. Animal Welfare Act and Animal Welfare Regulations

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BUREA U OF DOG LA WENFORCEMENT 2301 N. CAMERON STREET, HARRISBURG, PA

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator JAMES W. HOLZAPFEL District 10 (Ocean)

Selected City Codes Regulating Livestock and Fowl. for the City of Ethridge Tennessee

DATE -OF FINAL PASSAGE.

2009 WISCONSIN ACT 90

ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE COUNTY OF MUSKEGON. Ordinance No September 12, 2006

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

Animal rescue organization

Subject: Public safety; welfare of animals; sale of dogs and cats. Statement of purpose of bill as introduced: This bill proposes to amend 6

CHICKENS & DUCKS IN ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY

ADDENDUM A CHAPTER 3 ANIMALS ARTICLE I - LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

LEGISLATURE

ORDINANCE NO. hundreds of thousands of dogs and cats are housed and bred at substandard breeding

Sec Mandatory spaying and neutering. a. 1. Requirement. No person may own, keep, or harbor an unaltered and unspayed dog or cat in

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Defendants. INTRODUCTION

2018 JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SALE PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS

Application Process for Veterans with Service Connected Disabilities

CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS

2015 RESOLUTION NO. R Official Resolution of the Board of Commissioners Macomb County, Michigan

As Passed by the Senate. Regular Session Sub. H. B. No

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

Exhibit 6-2 Policy Overview

February 1, 2018 Robert Gibbens, D.V.M. Director, Animal Welfare Operations USDA/APHIS/Animal Care

Supplemental Request for Investigation of Widespread and Egregious Animal Suffering at Wilson s Wild Animal Park in Apparent Violation of Permit

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

AGENDA ITEM. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: July 25, 2017

MTAS Sample Animal Licensing Regulations

WHEREAS, tens of thousands of unwanted and abandoned dogs and cats are euthanized every year; and

NAIA Shelter Import and Reporting Act Model Law

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 78, ANIMALS WITHIN THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY:

The Sad Truth about Puppy Mills

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY BOSCOLA, FUMO, LAVALLE, TARTAGLIONE, FONTANA, FERLO AND LOGAN, MAY 9, 2007

Department of Code Compliance

Qualifications of Exhibitor

American Kennel Club Letter to Dr. Fox (below): Dear Dr. Fox,

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF CLARK, SECTION 1. Title 10, Chapter 08, Section 130 of the Clark County Code is hereby

REFERENCE - CALIFORNIA LAW: Pet Boarding Facilities, effective January 1, 2017 (2016 SB 945, Senator William Monning)

Via and UPS overnight delivery

CECIL COUNTY HOBBY KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION

Via UPS (with exhibits) and Request for an Inspection of Three Bears General Store (License No.

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

S 2510 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Administrative Changes to the Regulations Governing the National Veterinary Accreditation

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

WikiLeaks Document Release

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

TOWN OF BARNSTABLE TOWN MANAGER'S DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS THE CITIES OF JACKSONVILLE, LONOKE NORTH LITTLE ROCK AND BEEBE, ARKANSAS

Transcription:

November 23, 2015 Board of County Commissioners Nye County, Nevada 2100 E. Walt Williams Dr., Ste. 100 Pahrump, NV 89048 Via e-mail: lawichman@gmail.com; fcarbone@co.nye.nv.us; coxdonnac@msn.com; aborasky@co.nye.nv.us; dschinhofen@co.nye.nv.us Re: Appeal of Issuance of CU-2015-000012, Kayla Mitchell s (dba Big Cat Encounters ) Application for a CUP to keep Ten Tigers in Pahrump Dear Chair Wichman, Vice Chair Carbone, and Commissioners Borasky, Schinhofen, and Cox: On behalf of the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) and its hundreds of thousands of members and supporters, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and its more than three million members and supporters, Lions, Tigers & Bears Sanctuary, Keepers of the Wild Sanctuary, and Big Cat Rescue Sanctuary, we are writing to submit an official appeal of the issuance of CU-2015-000012 by the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission ( RPC ) on November 12, 2015, pursuant to Nye County Code 17.04.075 (A) 1 and 16.36.080 (B). 2 ALDF, PETA, Lions, Tigers & Bears, Keepers of the Wild, and Big Cat Rescue are aggrieved 3 by the RPC s recent decision and request that this matter be set for a hearing in Pahrump within sixty (60) days. 4 A check for $200 will be delivered with a hard copy of this appeal. 5 The RPC s decision was improper for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to: 1) the ongoing and illegal exhibition and interstate transport of big cats by Kayla and Karl Mitchell (dba Big Cat Encounters ) without a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) exhibitor s license; and 2) the Nye County District Judge Kim Wanker s order mandating 1 Any decision of the planning commission, county commission or any other person appointed or employed by the county who is authorized to make administrative decisions regarding the use of land, may be appealed in writing to the Nye County commission by any person aggrieved by such a decision. Appeals shall be handled in accordance with title 16, chapter 16.36 of this code. (Ord. 285, 2004). 2 Any person aggrieved by a decision of a planning commission, zoning board of adjustment or hearing examiner, which is related to a variance, conditional use permit or special exception may file an appeal with the board. The appeal must be in writing and accompanied by the required fee for a public hearing appeal, must clearly specify what part of the decision is being appealed, and must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of the decision. The board shall schedule a public hearing on the appeal as early as is practicable, and in no case not more than sixty (60) days after receipt of the appeal. 3 See N.R.S. 278.3195. 4 See Nye County Code, 16.36.080 (B)(2). 5 See id., 16.36.050 (A) (providing for submission of a $200 fee with any appeal of a decision by the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission concerning a conditional use permit). 1

removal of the cats from the premises due to conditional use permit revocation based on the Mitchells ongoing illegal exhibition of big cats without a USDA license. As you are aware from the correspondence you have received from the USDA (a copy of which is enclosed) regarding the Mitchells exhibition of tigers to the public for a fee, the Mitchells are violating the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) by continuing to exhibit tigers more than ten years after the USDA revoked the AWA exhibitor license for Karl Mitchell and Big Cat Encounters (in part because Mitchell was improperly withholding water as a training technique). 6 The USDA already admonished Nye County that: [N]either Karl Mitchell nor any of his affiliated businesses, holds a valid AWA license. The license previously held by Mr. Mitchell (No. 88-C-0076) was revoked by order of the Secretary of Agriculture in 2001. Mr. Mitchell may not be issued another AWA license. The AWA regulations bar a person whose license has been revoked from buying, selling, transporting, delivering for transport, or exhibiting any animal. 7 As USDA license revocation is permanent, Mitchell will never be eligible for a USDA license again. This means that the exhibition of tigers by Mitchell and Big Cat Encounters will never be legal. It is also important to underscore that, due to Big Cat Encounters ongoing illegal exhibition of cats by Karl and Kayla Mitchell, Kayla Mitchell will never be eligible for a USDA license either. Indeed, the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which governs the issuance of USDA licenses to animal exhibitors, provides that Any person who has been or is an officer, agent, or employee of a licensee whose license has been suspended or revoked and who was responsible for or participated in the violation upon which the order of suspension or revocation was based will not be licensed within the period during which the order of suspension or revocation is in effect. 8 Relevant AWA regulations also provide that: Any person whose license has been revoked shall not be licensed in his or her own name or in any other manner; nor will any partnership, firm, corporation, or other legal entity in which any such person has a substantial interest, financial or otherwise, be licensed. Any person whose license has been suspended or revoked shall not buy, sell, transport, exhibit, or deliver for transportation, any animal during the period of suspension or revocation. 9 6 See, e.g., In re Karl Mitchell, an individual, and Big Cat Encounters, a Nevada Corporation, AWA Docket No. 09-0084 (attached). 7 See Letter from Dr. Robert M. Gibbens, Western Regional Director, USDA/APHIS/Animal Care, to Commissioner Dan Schinhofen, Nye County Board of Commissioners, Oct. 22, 2012 (attached); see also, Images 1-3 below, demonstrating that Kayla and Karl Mitchell are improperly transporting big cats across state lines without a USDA license. 8 See 9 C.F.R. 2.9. 9 See id. 2.10 (b)-(c). 2

Despite the foregoing regulations, the Mitchells have continued to illegally exhibit tigers to the public, and are transporting animals across state lines violation of the foregoing prohibition (see Images 1-3 below). Indeed, Kayla Mitchell admitted as much during the November 12, 2015, RPC hearing and boldly discloses their improper interstate transport on her public Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/kaylancats?fref=ts). Any correspondence and guidance that the County and the RPC have received about Karl Mitchell and Big Cat Encounters from the USDA about the illegal exhibition of tigers is equally applicable to Kayla Mitchell as Ranch Manager and Tiger Trainer for Big Cat Encounters; meaning, Kayla Mitchell cannot legally exhibit tigers to the public and is not eligible for a USDA license. Moreover, Kayla Mitchell is complicit in the violations of Karl Mitchell s CUP that precipitated the pending nuisance abatement case in Nye County. As you are aware, a Nye County District Court Judge Kim Wanker ordered removal of the tigers from the property located at 6061 N. Woodchips Road due to Mitchell s refusal to comply with the RPC s revocation of his previous conditional use permit, which was properly revoked due to Mitchell s violation of the terms of the permit, which requires compliance with applicable laws. As the USDA advised, the Mitchells and Big Cat Encounters are violating federal AWA regulations by exhibiting tigers (and by allowing and encouraging direct visitor contact with big cats). The court order has been entered against Karl Mitchell, Big Cat Encounters, and property owner, Ray Mielzinski. The RPC s issuance of a CUP to Kayla Mitchell was improper on that basis alone because Mielzinski is still the property owner and he is under court order to remove special conditions animals from the address on Woodchips Road. It s shocking that four members of the RPC fell for the Mitchells desperate stunt, and you will likely hear a lot of excuses from the Mitchells about therapy animals and their alleged operation as a private shelter. Tigers, other apex predators, and other species of non-domesticated animals are not recognized as therapy animals under applicable disability laws. Certainly ten of any animal (on top of the continued breeding that the Mitchells are facilitating, see Image 4 below) is not necessary or recognized for therapy purposes. Even private facilities that exhibit to the public must have a USDA exhibitor license. As the USDA has made abundantly clear, Karl Mitchell and Big Cat Encounters will never be eligible for another USDA license. That is a de facto admonishment that Kayla Mitchell, as the agent and Ranch Manager of a facility whose license has been permanently revoked is not eligible for a USDA license. Moreover, Kayla and Karl Mitchell continue to brazenly advertise public exhibition of tigers on their Big Cat Encounters website: Big Cat Experience: Itinerary The Big Cat Encounters Ranch is located in Pahrump, Nevada, a short distance from Las Vegas. We are a private entity reserved for VIP types and not the general public. Casual attire is recommended; dress appropriately to accommodate the outside temperature of Las Vegas. Remember, the big cat reserve is a rustic, desert ranch inhabited by wild Bengal tigers. Children welcome when accompanied by an adult. Visit the donate tab to make a deposit, and put reservations in the "purpose" box. Thanks for your interest. 3

See http://www.bigcatencounters.org/bigcattours.html (emphasis added). The above-referenced advertisement is an advertisement for public exhibition as defined by the federal Animal Welfare Act. Indeed, Dr. Robert Gibbens expressly advised the Commissioners that this exact advertisement, taken directly from the Big Cat Encounters three years ago and still advertised today, is considered exhibition under the AWA 10 and requires a valid USDA license (which neither Kayla nor Karl Mitchell possess). Exhibition is any display of animals for a fee regardless of how frequent it is. 11 Moreover, the Mitchells fall back on faulty logic that their self-designated status as a private shelter exempts them from AWA requirements and oversight when the AWA expressly applies to public or private facilities. 12 Because license revocation is permanent, and because Kayla Mitchell is an agent of Big Cat Encounters and Karl Mitchell, she is also permanently disqualified from obtaining a USDA exhibitors license. Issuance of CU-2015-000012 defies logic and is tantamount to the RPC enabling a violation of the pending Nye County District Court s order, and the federal AWA. It renders meaningless the countless hours that the Nye County planning staff, county attorneys, law enforcement officers, and you yourselves have been forced to spend to ensure that the Mitchells are not given a free pass to violate county laws meant to keep your community safe. The Mitchells have had years to comply with the county s directives. As long as Kayla Mitchell is affiliated with Big Cat Encounters, the Nye County Court order pertains to her equally, as does the USDA s revocation of her husband and Big Cat Encounters USDA license. Therefore, we request that you set a hearing for the appeal of CU-2015-000012. ALDF, PETA, Lions, Tigers, & Bears, Keepers of the Wild, and Big Cat Rescue stand ready to help rehome the ten tigers (and recently-born cub) to reputable, true, sanctuaries where they will have vast, naturalistic habitats and won t be used as props for public handling and other public exhibitions. Please advise me of the date that this matter is set for hearing in accordance with Nye County Code 16.36.080 (B)(2) and don't hesitate to contact me at 504-274-9381 or cnasser@aldf.org with any questions. Very truly yours, Carney Anne Nasser, Esq. Legislative Counsel ALDF 10 See id. 11 See 7 U.S.C. 2132 (h): The term exhibitor means any person (public or private) exhibiting any animals, which were purchased in commerce or the intended distribution of which affects commerce, or will affect commerce, to the public for compensation, as determined by the Secretary, and such term includes carnivals, circuses, and zoos exhibiting such animals whether operated for profit or not. 12 See id. (emphasis added). 4

Brittany Peet, Esq. Deputy Director Captive Animal Law Enforcement PETA Foundation Bobbi Brink Founder and Director Lions, Tigers, & Bears Sanctuary /s/ Jonathan Kraft Jonathan Kraft Founder and Director Keepers of the Wild Sanctuary /s/ Carole Baskin Carole Baskin Founder and Director Big Cat Rescue Sanctuary cc: jkoenigrpc@sbcglobal.net; gth2@pucihafen.com; bobking1948@yahoo.com; clarktruckofcal@yahoo.com; rapahrump@gmail.com; fcarbone@co.nye.nv.us Attachments 5

Screen Grabs from Kayla Mitchell s Facebook Page Image 1: On September 7, 2013, Kayla Mitchell posted on her public Facebook page that she and Karl had gone to Oklahoma to acquire two new tiger cubs to bring back to Big Cat Encounters, thus violating 9 C.F.R. 2.10. Image 2: Kayla Mitchell posted photographs of tiger cubs Thelma and Louise, who were acquired from an exhibitor in Oklahoma and transported by the Mitchells back to Big Cat Encounters at 6061 N. Woodchips Rd. 6

Image 3: Kayla Mitchell posted on August 6, 2014, the acquisition of yet another tiger cub from Oklahoma exhibitor Joe Schriebvogel. Yet again, violating the prohibition on interstate transport of big cats without a USDA license. Image 4: Kayla Mitchell posted on October 30, 2015, that she and Karl had bred two of their tigers and a new tiger had been born at Big Cat Encounters on October 1, 2015. 7