REPORT ON QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL S DOG CONTROL POLICIES AND PRACTICES Financial year

Similar documents
Report to ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & REGULATIONS Committee for decision

1 INTRODUCTION 2 GENERAL

DOG CONTROL POLICY 2016

THAMES COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT ON DOG CONTROL

Annual Dog Control. Report to Secretary LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2016/17. Te Kaunihera o Papaioea Palmerston North City Council

Dog Control Act 1996 and amendments in 2003, 2004 and 2006 hereafter referred to as the Act. Enforcement Guidelines (under the Act), May 2009

Registered/Unregistered Dogs

DOGS POLICY (Made under s 10 of the Dog Control Act 1996) LEG

DOG CONTROL POLICY. Effective from 28 August 2018

TIMARU DISTRICT DOG CONTROL POLICY 2018

Annual Dog Control Report

CARTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL DOG CONTROL BYLAW 1997

Dog Control Policy. Hauraki District Council. Hauraki District Council PO Box 17, Paeroa William St, Paeroa

Dog Control Policy and Practices 2017/18

1.0 TITLE AND COMMENCEMENT INTERPRETATION MANDATORY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE ACT...

INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL. Bylaw 2018/2 Dog Control

Manawatu District Council. Dog Control Policy

5. COMPLIANCE. Policy 5.5. Companions Animals Policy. Version 2

Waitomo District Dog Control Bylaw 2015

BY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS

INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL. Bylaw 2018/2 Dog Control

ANNUAL REPORT DOG CONTROL POLICY AND PRACTICES

INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL. Bylaw 2015/1 Dog Control

DOG CONTROL BYLAW 2014

Neighbourhood Manager, Neighbourhoods Business Manager, Neighbourhoods Services Manager, Care and Support Business Manager, Care and Support

Dog Control Bylaw 2018

DOG OWNERS Handbook 2017/2018

WHEREAS, The Municipalities Act, 2005, provides that a Council may by bylaw:

AND WHEREAS by motion 13-GC-253 the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Bracebridge deems it expedient to amend By-law ;

DOG CONTROL POLICY (AMENDED)

STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL Hamilton Dog Control Bylaw 2015 & Dog Control Policy

Proposed new Dog Control Bylaw and Dog Control Policy 2016

Acting Inspections and Enforcement Manager Mark Vincent, Team Leader Animal Control

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

Pets and Animals Policy

LANGSTANE HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PET POLICY

TOWN OF LUMSDEN BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, CONTROLLING, REGULATING AND IMPOUNDING OF DOGS.

Kaipara District Council. Kaipara District Policy on Dogs. and Dog Management Bylaw

TOWN OF ECKVILLE BYLAW #701/10 DOG CONTROL BYLAW

WESTLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL DOG CONTROL BYLAW

CONTROL OF DOGS BYLAW

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

WAIROA WAIROA DISTRICT

Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WELLINGTON NORTH

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

BYLAW NUMBER

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

NELSON CITY COUNCIL PROPOSED DOG CONTROL POLICY FEBRUARY 2012

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

BYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.

The Council of the RM of Duck Lake No. 463 in the Province of Saskatchewan enacts as follows:

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 17, 30th January, No. 1 of 2014

TOWN OF ECKVILLE BYLAW NO Dog Control Bylaw

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HAWKESBURY

Dog Licensing and Control By-law PH-4 - Consolidated as of October 17, 2017

A1 Control of dangerous and menacing dogs (reviewed 04/01/15)

Manawatu District Council Dog Control Bylaw 2014 Contents

GIVE ME SHELTER. South Australia's new dog and cat laws: a guide for shelter and rescue organisations

Domestic Animals Act What s in it; why and how will that affect me?

VILLAGE OF CHASE BYLAW NO DOG CONTROL AND IMPOUNDING BYLAW

Chief Administrative Officer or CAO means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village or their designate.

BYLAW NUMBER

BYLAW NUMBER

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

Bylaw No. 641, Amendment to 605 Dog Control Bylaw

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

BYLAW 837/12 Cat Control Bylaw

1 Short Title This Bylaw may be cited as the Clutha District Council Dog Control Bylaw 2016.

CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013

ATHABASCA COUNTY BYLAW NO

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY-LAW NUMBER

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16

Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan

GORE DISTRICT COUNCIL DOG CONTROL BYLAW 2013

Pit Bull Dog Licensing By-law

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #1 FOR THE YEAR 2014 LICENSING & CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF TAYLOR

TOWN OF MAIDSTONE BYLAW NO

BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS

Auckland Council Animal Management Annual Report 2013/14

TOWN OF LEROY BYLAW NO. 5/07 A BYLAW RESPECTING ANIMAL CONTROL

C. Penalty: Penalty for failure to secure said license shall be as established by Council resolution for the entire year. (Ord.

BYLAW NO. 3429/2009. Being a Bylaw to regulate and control Dogs within The City of Red Deer. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RED DEER ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

THE CORPORATION OF TOWN OF PETROLIA. BY-LAW NO. 10 of 2009

Dog Ownership. Barking. Health. Fouling. * Provide your dog with safe and. * Walk your dog at least twice a day * Keep your dog inside when you are

THE CITY OF GREATER GEELONG DOMESTIC ANIMAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Palmerston North City Council Draft Dog Control Policy 2018

BYLAW NO SUMMER VILLAGE OF YELLOWSTONE DOG AND CAT CONTROL BYLAW

VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

These Regulations may be cited as the City of Corner Brook Animal Regulations.

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW

DOG LICENCING BYLAW NO EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 24, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY

Grey District Council Dog Control Bylaw 2015

Transcription:

REPORT ON QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL S DOG CONTROL POLICIES AND PRACTICES 2011 2012 Financial year Section 10A of the Dog Control Act 1996 requires that a territorial authority report each financial year on its dog control policies and practices. THE DOG CONTROL ACT 1996 The objects of the Act are as follows: (a) To make better provision for the care and control of dogs (i) By requiring the registration of dogs; (ii) By making special provision in relation to dangerous dogs; (iii) By imposing on the owners of dogs, obligations designed to ensure that dogs do not cause a nuisance to any person and do not injure, endanger, or cause distress to any person; and (iv) By imposing on owners of dogs obligations designed to ensure that dogs do not injure, endanger, or cause distress to any stock, poultry, domestic animal, or protected wildlife; and (b) To make provision in relation to damage caused by dogs. Queenstown Lakes District Council has also adopted a policy and has a bylaw, which specify dog control measures throughout the district. It also educates dog owners of their responsibilities, in order that we have a safe environment for all to enjoy. DUTY OF TERRITORIAL AUTHORITIES TO ADOPT POLICY ON DOGS Section 10 of the Act has been amended by the 2003 Amendment Act and requires QLDC to develop a policy on dogs. The purpose of the policy is to set out QLDC s direction for dog control within the District. The amendment to Section 10 also reinforces the safety provisions QLDC must have regard to in adopting this policy on dogs. Added considerations are the need to avoid the inherent danger in allowing dogs to have uncontrolled access to public places frequented by children, and the importance of enabling the public to use streets and public amenities without fear of attack or intimidation by dogs. ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS There are 1.7 FTE who respond to animal control issues throughout the district. This is approximately 1.3 FTE based in Queenstown and the other 0.4 FTE in Wanaka. Animal control officers can be contacted 24 hours a day, with Lakes Environmental (CCO) receiving the calls during office hours (Monday to Friday 8am 5pm). If a complaint is

received outside of these times, this is referred to our after-hours team to respond to the matter. The afterhour s numbers for animal control being: Wanaka 443 0024 Queenstown 441 0499 DOG CONTROL ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES The Dog Control Act 1996 and QLDC Dog Control Bylaw 2006 are enforced by Queenstown Lakes District Animal Control Officers. Anyone found in contravention of the Dog Control Bylaw 2006 or Act is generally issued a warning for a first offence. If there is a further contravention the dog owners are likely to be issued an Infringement Notice without further warning. In 2010 2011 the main issue identified was barking dogs. Over the last year there has been a focus to reduce the number of such complaints regarding barking dogs, through better education and response to complaints. This year 2011-2012 there was almost a 50% reduction in the number of barking dog complaints from 100 to 52. The significant decrease in complaints can be directly attributed to the efforts put in by Lakes Environmental and its officers educating dog owners who Lakes Environmental have received complaints about and providing them with brochures specifically developed by Lakes Environmental re this issue. The escalated enforcement approach has also ensured that owners of barking dogs have taken quick action to implement mitigation where necessary. The main issues identified over the last year 2011-2012 has been lost dogs reported by their owners and Roaming Dogs reported by the public. The increases have been 87-184 and 42-158 respectively. Due to the significant increase discussed above, the subject areas will form the focus of education and enforcement to owners during the coming year. DOG PROHIBITED, LEASH ONLY AND EXERCISE AREAS Areas Where Dogs Are Prohibited Dogs are not permitted in the following areas at any time with the exception of Companion dogs, Guide dogs and Hearing dogs. Arrowtown: Queenstown: Wanaka: And: Buckingham Street between Berkshire and Wiltshire Streets and including the Arrowtown Village Green and Marshall Park. Beach Street, the Mall, the Village Green and Earnslaw Park Bremner Bay, between 1 December and 31 March Areas laid out and equipped as children s play grounds Areas within a 50 meter radius of defined children s play grounds; Defined playing areas of sports fields; All Cemeteries.

National Parks A significant part of Mount Aspiring National Park (as constituted under National Parks Act 1980) is located within the Queenstown Lakes District. Dogs are not permitted in any National Parks. Conservation Areas The Department of Conservation (DOC) advised QLDC of controlled or open dog areas under Section 26ZS of the Conservation Act 1987 for inclusion in this Policy. Separate rules and regulations apply to these areas as determined by DoC. Areas where dogs are required to be on a leash Dogs are generally permitted in residential and urban areas at any time if they are on a leash. Dogs may not be let off their leashes in these areas i.e. not under control. In general these are residential or distinctly urban areas, but do not include reserves or QLDC owned walking tracks. In any case dogs are required to be on a leash in the following (but not limited to) zones: Any areas zoned as follows in the QLDC District Plan and any roads running through or adjacent to these Zones: Wanaka Town Centre Zone Queenstown Town Centre Zone Arrowtown Town Centre Zone Corner Shopping Centre Zone High Density Residential Zone Low Density Residential Zone Residential Arrowtown Historic Management Zone Township Zone Remarkables Park Zone Resort Zone Bendemeer Zone Penrith Park Zone Quail Rise Zone Airport Mixed use Zone Dogs may be allowed off a leash in areas where they are not specifically prohibited or required to be on leash. In any area where a dog is not required to be on a leash and the dog has been allowed off the leash, the owner of that dog must have the dog under voice control and be carrying a leash at all times. Should the dog be deemed as causing a threat or nuisance to any person or animal, the dog must be immediately leashed and brought under control. DOG REGISTRATION FEES Registration Every person who has in their possession a dog over three months old is required to register their dog annually, and to advise the QLDC promptly of any change of address or ownership of the dog. If owners do not meet the obligations to register their dogs, enforcement procedures are initiated. Lakes Environmental advise all registered dog owners at least two weeks in advice of the renewal of registration date, in order to try and facilitate the renewal process, in order that owners are not penalised. This is a graduated approach, which follows the following format:

A public notice to remind owners of their obligations to register their dog(s) and when, along with a letter/invoice to each owner, including an amnesty period for any unregistered dog(s). A reminder letter with a 50% penalty increase for non registration within the specified time frame. An infringement is issued Unregistered dogs may be seized and impounded There has been a significant increase (13%) in the number of registered dogs over the last year, however, the number of menacing and dangerous dog has altered to very minor degree as outlined below: Category 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Total number of Registered Dogs 3225 3277 3713 a) Dangerous by owner conviction under 0 0 1 s.31(1)(a) b) Dangerous by sworn evidence under 2 2 2 s.31(1)(b) c) Dangerous by owner admittance in 0 0 0 writing under s.31(1)(c) Total number of Dangerous Dogs 2 2 3 a) Menacing under s33a(1)(b)(i) 5 10 11 Behaviour b) Menacing under s33a(1)(b)(ii) - Breed characteristics 0 0 0 c) Menacing under s33c(1) - Schedule 0 3 3 4 Breed/Type Total number of Menacing Dogs 5 13 14 Total number of Probationary Owners 0 0 1 Total number of Disqualified Owners 0 0 0 Dogs Registered Outside of the Queenstown Lakes District Due to the large percentage of holiday homes in the District, there is often an influx of dogs from other Districts at certain times of the year. Currently there is no mechanism to keep track of visiting dogs and, as such, problems can arise when endeavoring to enforce Council s bylaws. The Dog Control Act requires that any dog that is kept in a District for four weeks or more be registered within that District. Registration Fees QLDC has a tiered fee structure(as below), allowing fees to be set at various levels for those categories of dogs that Council may from time to time choose to recognise. Category Fee if paid on or before 31 July 2012 Fee if paid after 31 July 2012 Disability Assist Dog (e.g. Guide Dog) NIL NIL Working Dog $35 $52.50 Spayed/Neutered Dog $60 $90 All Other Dogs $70 $105

Dangerous/Menacing Dog $145 $217.50 Impound Fees 1st Impound Fee $100 2nd Impound Fee $160 3rd Impound Fee $240 Feeding Fees (while impounded) $35 per day Microchip Fee $35 Dogs assisting the disabled are exempt from registration fees. This recognises the contribution of these dogs to the community. The registration fees are intended to contribute to: Administration of the registration process and collection of fees; Information provision to dog owners; Patrolling; and Enforcement (with the exception of prosecution). The fee structure takes into account the actual cost of the services used by dog owners. However, Council currently provides approximately 40% of the costs of the service. Neutered Dog Discount QLDC wishes to encourage neutering of dogs as part of promoting responsible ownership and reducing the incidents of straying and unwanted dogs. The registration fee structure recognises this by setting a lower rate for neutered dogs. DISQUALIFIED & PROBATIONARY DOG OWNERS There was one probationary Dog Owners in the Queenstown Lakes District within this financial period. MENACING AND DANGEROUS DOGS There were 3 Dangerous Dogs and 14 Menacing Dogs registered in the district for the 2011-2012 period, which is an increase of only 1 in regards to menacing dogs. The owner of a dog that is classified as dangerous or menacing must not allow the dog to be at large or in any public place without being muzzled in such a manner as to prevent the dog from biting but to allow it to breath and drink without obstruction. MANDATORY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE ACT The Dog Control Act 1996 sets out provisions that QLDC is obliged to comply with and enforce i.e. QLDC has no discretion to set these aside. In terms of this policy, the statutory requirements are summarised below: It is unlawful to import any of the following breeds/types of dog: Breed of dog Brazilian Fila Dogo Argentino Japanese Tosa

Perro de Presa Canario Type of dog American Pit Bull Terrier If QLDC has reasonable grounds to believe that a dog belongs wholly or predominantly to one of the four breeds/types listed above it must classify the dog as menacing. Menacing dogs must be muzzled when in public. Lakes Environmental currently makes an assessment regarding these dogs, to determine if they meet the criteria of the Act. Leash The QLDC Policy requires those taking dogs out in public to use or carry a leash at all times. In addition it requires Dangerous and Menacing dogs to be leashed when in public and owners of dangerous and menacing dogs must advise anyone to whom they lend the dog of the requirement that it must be muzzled and leashed (in the case of dangerous dogs) when in public. Unlawful Release of Dog from Pound It is an offence to attempt to unlawfully release a dog from a pound or to be in possession of a dog that has been unlawfully released from a pound. Control Dog owners must ensure at all times that, when their dog is on their property, it is either: (a) under direct control of a person; or (b) confined in such a manner that it cannot freely leave the property. Micro-chipping All dogs registered for the first time on or after 1 July 2006, and all dogs classified as dangerous or menacing since 1 December 2003 are be required to be micro-chipped. DOG CONTROL RESPONSE This section describes the number and type of complaints received and the manner in which Queenstown Lakes District Council has responded to address the complaints and general issues regarding dogs over the last year. Category of Complaint 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Public Safety related complaints Dog attack on people - minor 10 4 4 Dog attack on people serious 1 15 4 Dog attack on animal minor 4 17 12 Dog attack on animal serious 12 19 13 Dog attack on stock (worrying 3 8 4 stock) Dog rushing 0 13 17 Roaming dogs 62 42 158 General concern 101 56 31 Non-safety Concerns Lost dogs 141 87 184 Barking 34 100 52 Fouling/breach of Bylaw 2 7 17 Total complaints 370 368 496

Attacks When an attack occurs on a person or animal, the incident can be extremely distressing for all parties. It is imperative that we have a rapid response to such matters and appropriate action is taken. Over the last year we have seen an decrease in the number of serious attacks from 23 to 8, which is reflected in the reduced number of infringements issued for dogs not being under control and the limited increase in Menacing dog classifications this year. Lost & Roaming Dogs Roaming dogs are a District wide issue, which can frighten, intimidate or annoy others, in addition to attacking other animals and people. There has been a 276% increase in the number of roaming dogs reports this year from 42 to 158. Due to increased education to the public in general about the wider issues of roaming dogs the public are increasing their reporting of these dogs to Lakes Environmental. As discussed earlier in this report the subject area will form the focus of education and enforcement to owners during the coming year. There will be key hot spot areas identified and patrols increased in these areas. Barking Dogs Barking dogs can create a significant nuisance, as discussed earlier in the report Lakes Environmental has achieved almost a 50% decrease in Barking dog complaints over the last year though educating dog owners and providing them with brochures specifically developed by Lakes Environmental re this issue. The escalated enforcement approach has also ensured that owners of barking dogs have taken quick action to implement mitigation where necessary. General Concerns There was a 45% reduction in the number of general concerns from 56-31. This area also includes aspects of welfare. Prosecutions There has been an on-going prosecution by Council during this period which has not yet been heard. The focus of this prosecution was a Pit Bull Type Dog (not wholly or predominantly) already classified as menacing due to dog on dog attack, attacking a dog for a second time. Infringements There has been a 16% decrease in the number of infringements issued during this period from 151 to 126. The main and significant decrease has been in regards to owners failing to keep their dogs under control, this is a direct reflection on the reduction of serious attacks on people and animals. OFFENCE 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Failure to comply with classification 1 2 0 Failure to register dog 73 105 98 Failure to advise of address change 1 0 0 Failure to keep dog controlled/confined 11 27 23 on owners property Failure to keep dog under control 24 15 2 Failure to carry a leash in public 1 1 0 Total 111 151 123