EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

Similar documents
EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

SMART WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS Introducing DxM MicroScan WalkAway System* ...

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

Performance Information. Vet use only

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

AMR Industry Alliance Antibiotic Discharge Targets

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Penicillins - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints (version 1.3)

HUSRES Annual Report 2007 Martti Vaara.

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

21 st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report Antibiotics Review

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8)

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

What is new in 2011: Methods and breakpoints in relation to subcommittees and expert groups. by author. Gunnar Kahlmeter, Derek Brown

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS Main index

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Urine - Gram Positive Susceptibility Reporting 1 Staphylococcus species, MRSA...11

EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Brief reports. Heat stability of the antimicrobial activity of sixty-two antibacterial agents

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

EARS-Net Belgium Data call for 2016: Instructions for participating laboratories, including data definition. (version 4, 20/3/2017)

MicroScan Microbiology Systems MORE CHOICES MORE ANSWERS. MicroScan GRAM NEGATIVE AND GRAM POSITIVE PANELS

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

EARS Net Report, Quarter

2 New products for 2014

Antibiotic Abyss. Discussion Points. MRSA Treatment Guidelines

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR)

Interpreting Microbiology reports for better Clinical Decisions Interpreting Antibiogrammes

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

EAGAR Importance Rating and Summary of Antibiotic Uses in Humans in Australia

EUCAST Expert Rules for Staphylococcus spp IF resistant to isoxazolylpenicillins

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

The impact of antimicrobial resistance on enteric infections in Vietnam Dr Stephen Baker

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

ANNUAL REPORT. Antimicrobial activity of various antibiotics against non-invasive clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing challenges. Linda Joyce St Vincent s Hospital Melbourne

Antibiotics 1. Lecture 8

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Version 13 January 2014

Version 8 January 2009

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY DETECTION OF ELEVATED MICs TO PENICILLINS IN β- HAEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCI

Jasmine M. Chaitram, 1,2 * Laura A. Jevitt, 1,2 Sara Lary, 1,2 Fred C. Tenover, 1,2 and The WHO Antimicrobial Resistance Group 3,4

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Perichondritis: Source: UpToDate Ciprofloxacin 10 mg/kg/dose PO (max 500 mg/dose) BID Inpatient: Ceftazidime 50 mg/kg/dose q8 hours IV

Principles of Antibiotics Use & Spectrum of Some

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Transcription:

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 1 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 Fastidious organisms EUCAST Interpretation zones and MIC breakpoints according to recommendations by the "Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Societé Française de Microbiologie" (July 2015) Inoculum, media and incubation conditions acc. to SFM (2015) NEOSENSITABS POTENCY CODE S I R S R Ampicillin 10 µg AMP10 e) spp. Use Ampi 2 µg Campylobacter spp. 19 1814 < 14 4 6 e) Ampicillin 2 µg** AMP.2 spp. Penicillin 1 U PENG1 N. gonorrhoeae 16 >= 21 >= 16 >= 17 34 >= 12 >= 13 >= 17 >= 29 2015 3323 < 13 < 29 <=0.5 <=0.12 Oxacillin 1 µg # OXA.1 a) 20 > 0.12 MIC test d) Streptococcus spp. 15 MIC test l) N. gonorrhoeae 14 < 14 MIC test g) N. meningitidis 12 < 12 MIC test Amoxycillin+Clav. 20+10 µg AMC30 spp./ 24 < 24 Campylobacter spp. 19 1814 < 14 4/2 6/2 Amoxycillin + Clavulanate 2 + 1 ug AMC.3 / >= 15 >= 19 2017 4/2 /2 Ticarcillin+Clavulanate 75+15 µg TI+CL 24 2322 < 22 8/2 6/2 Piperacillin+Tazobactam 100+10µg*PI+TZ 2019 8/4 6/4 Cefepime 30 ug FEP30 27 < 27 > 0.25 Cefpodoxime 10 ug CPD10 26 2523 Cephalothin 30 µg CEP30 e) spp. (Amp R) Campylobacter 18 1712 < 12 8 > 32 Ceftizoxime 30 µg** ZOX30 b) (valid for 3rd gen. cephalosporins) 28 < 28

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 2 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 NEOSENSITABS POTENCY CODE S I R S R Cefotaxime 5µg CTX.5 / / Ceftriaxone 30 µg CTR30 >= 26 20 1917 <=0.12 > 0.12 b) (use Ceftizoxime) H. influenza 30 0.12 24 2321 < 21 N. gonorrhoeae 40 0.12 N. meningitidis 38 0.12 Campylobacter spp. 26 2523 Cefoxitin 30 µg CFO30 > 32 Imipenem 10 µg IMI10 /streptococci 24 < 24 24 29 2317 < 29 Doripenem 10 µg DOR10 Meropenem 10 µg MRP10 /streptococci 24 < 24 N. meningitides 34 >= 26 33 3332 < 32 < 33 <=0.25 > 0.25 > 0.25 22 2115 Ertapenem 10 µg ERTAP S. pneumonia/streptococci 28 2724 < 24 26 / 29 < 29 Azithromycin 15 µg AZI15 28 2714 < 14 0.12 > 4 N.gonorrhoeae 27 2624 < 24 Erythromycin 15 µg # ERY15 c) Streptococcus haem n) Helicobacter pylori 22 2119 2018 2220 < 18 Campylobacter spp. 20 4 > 4 22 2117 > 4 >= 25 < 25 50 4910 < 10 6 Clindamycin 2 µg # CLI.2 19 >= 17 >= 20 <=0.5 15 4 > 4 Linezolid 10 µg LNZ10 /non haem strep haem 22 19 >= 24 >= 25 2119 1816 < 24 < 25 > 4 > 4 Telithromycin 15 µg TEL15 /strep haem >= 20 50 2220 1917 2220 4912 < 12 <=0.25 0.12

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 3 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 NEOSENSITABS POTENCY CODE S I R S R Tetracyclines 30 µg # TET30 spp./ 25 2422 < 22 Streptococcus spp. 28 2220 2725 < 25 N. gonorrhoeae (tet M) Campylobacter spp. / 30 >= 24 < 30 < 24 Minocycline (pneumo) 30 µg MIN30 >= 24 2321 < 21 2220 /moraxella 24 2321 < 21 Chloramphenicol 30 µg CLR30 spp. 28 30 < 28 < 30 haem Strep non haem >= 19 < 21 8 <= 8 8 N. gonorrhoeae 28 2724 < 24 4 6 N. meningitidis 30 > 4 Campylobacter spp. 2219 8 6 8 Rifampicin 5 µg RIF.5 spp. 18 < 18 Streptococcus/Pneumococci Strepto beta haem 22 >= 21 2117 2015 <=0.06 h) N. meningitidis 24 14 1310 < 10 4 6 Gentamicin 10 µg GEN1 >= 23 Campylobacter spp. 17 Tobramycin 10 µg TOB10 Campylobacter spp. 18 1716 > 4 c2) Norfloxacin (depistage) 10 µg # NORFX Reduced susceptibility S. pneumonia/streptococci < 12 to quinolones Ciprofloxacin 5 µg CIPR5 spp. 26 27 < 27 > 0.06 N. gonorrhoeae use Nalidixic acid 0.03 > 0.06 Campylobacter spp. 26 Helicobacter pylori N. meningitidis 20 50 36 >= 25 4916 3532 < 32 < 25 0.12 0.03 > 0.06 Ofloxacin 5 µg OFL.5 spp. N. gonorrhoeae use Nalidixic acid 0.12 > 0.25 Levofloxacin 5 µg LEVOF spp. 26 27 < 27 c2) 17 Streptococcus spp.(nonhaemol) 20 1917 > 0.06 Beta haem streptococci >= 18 1715

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 4 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 NEOSENSITABS POTENCY CODE S I R S R Moxifloxacin 5 µg MOXIF spp. 25 < 25 c2) 22 < 22 Streptococcus spp.( nonhaemol) beta haemol 24 >18 2321 1715 < 21 2018 < 18 Nalidixan 30 µg NAL30 f) / decreased susceptibility k) N. gonorrhoeae < 25 to quinolones i) N. meningitidis < 21 Campylobacter spp. 20 >= 23 1915 8 quinol 6 decrease Trimethoprim+Sulfa 1.25+23.75µg SxT25 spp. 2220 /9.5 /19 1815 / Streptococcus spp. Nitrofurantoin 100 ug NI100 (cystitis) 18 >= 29 >= 23 >= 19 18 15 1816 1715 < 29 < 1/19 <=0.06 64 /38 >0.06 Spectinomycin 200 µg SPECT N.gonorrhoea 20 64 > 64 Teicoplanin 30 µg TPN30 Non haem strep Tigecycline Streptococcus spp. Vancomycin 5µg VAN.5 Non Haem strep 17 15 >=16 17 19 16 >= 13 15 1816 < 13 <= 4 <=0.25 17 m) Metronidazole 16 µg* MTR16 < 21 4 > 4 Clostridium difficile 26 4 > 4 > 64 #) Differences of potency recommended by SFM and CLSI (if any available). *) There are no potency recommendations from CLSI so far. **) Special potency NeoSensitabs for detection of resistance mechanism. Pneumococci a) Oxacillin 1 µg is used for the detection of reduced sensitivity to Penicillin in pneumococci. Penicillin resistant isolates from the meninges must be considered resistant to Ampicillin/Amoxycillin, Amox+Clav and first and second generation cephalosporins. b) Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone must not be tested against pneumococci by the diffusion method. A surrogate test is used instead: Ceftizoxime, Ceftizoxime detects reduced sensitivity to third generation cephalosporins. Strains sensitive to Ceftizoxime show currently MIC < 0.5 µg/ml towards Cefotaxime/Ceftriaxone (susceptible), while isolates resistant to Ceftizoxime should be tested by an MIC method. c) Erythromycin: Interpretation valid for Azithromycin and Clarithromycin.

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 5 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 c 2) Screening of pneumococci for reduced sensitivity to fluoroquinolones is done using Norfloxacin 10 µg NeoSensitabs. If the inhibition zone is < 12 mm (or the MIC is >16 µg/ml) there is a high risk of development of resistant mutants in vivo. Penicillin resistant strains of Group A streptococci have not yet been recognized. Viridans streptococci isolated from blood or CSF should be tested for Penicillin or Ampicillin susceptibility using an MIC method. Group B streptococci with reduced susceptibility to Penicillin have been isolated. d) Oxacillin 1 µg is useful for screening for Penicillin susceptibility in Viridans streptococci. c) Erythromycin: Interpretation valid for Azithromycin and Clarithromycin. H. influenzae e) Betalactamase negative, Ampicillin resistant strains (BLNAR) are best detected using Ampicillin 2 µg NeoSensitabs. Cephalothin NeoSensitabs is also useful to detect BLNAR strains (zone mm). BLNAR isolates must be considered resistant to Amoxycillin, Amox+Clav, as well as first and second generation cephalosporins, no matter the size of the inhibition zone. f) Strains resistant to Nalidixic acid should be suspected of having reduced susceptibility to quinolones. Strains with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC 0.125 µg/ml) show decreased susceptibility to all quinolones. Meningococci g) Oxacillin 1 µg is used routinely for the detection of reduced sensitivity to penicillins, in meningococci (chromosomal resistance). h) Rifampicin: Used for prophylaxis only (not treatment). i) Nalidixan is useful to screen for strains with reduced susceptibility to quinolones. Gonococci k) Nalidixan is useful to detect strains with reduced susceptibility to quinolones. Ciprafloxacin resistant gonococci should presumably be resistant to all quinolones. A positive betalactamase test predicts resistance to Penicillin, Amoxycillin/Ampicillin, Piperacillin and Ticarcillin. l) Oxacillin 1 µg NeoSensitabs is useful to detect beta lactamase negative gonococci with decreased susceptibility to Penicillin (chromosomal resistance). Campylobacter For Campylobacter spp. the absence of zone of inhibition around ßlactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides or quinolones indicates high level resistance. Vancomycin 5 µg, Kanamycin 500 µg and Colistin 10 µg NeoSensitabs are very useful for the identification of the most important gram negative bacilli: B. fragilis group are resistant to Vancomycin 5 µg, Kanamycin 500 µg and Colistin 10 µg. Prevotella is resistant to Kanamycin 500 µg and Vancomycin 5 µg (zone < 18 mm), while it is variable to Colistin 10 µg. Porphyromonas is sensitive to Vancomycin 5 µg (zone 8 mm) and resistant to Kanamycin 500 µg and Colistin 10µg. Fusobacterium is sensitive to Kanamycin 500 µg and Colistin 10 µg and resistant to Vancomycin 5 µg. For species showing slow growth, it may be difficult to establish a correlation between MIC's and zone sizes. Use an MIC method. m) Metronidazole: Certain strains may show false resistance to Metronidazole if anaerobiosis is not correct. Helicobacter pylori n) Interpretation valid for Clarithromycin.

EUCASTand CLSI potency NEOSENSITABS Neo Sensitabs Page 6 / 6 Document: 6.2.0 References: 1) Barbut F. et al: Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serogroups of clinical strains of Clostridium difficile isolated in France in 1991 and 1997. Antimicr. Ag. Chemother., 43, 260711, 1999. 2) Communique 2004 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 3) Communique Janvier 2005 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 4) Communique Janvier 2006 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 5) Communique Janvier 2007 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 6) Communique Janvier 2008 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 7) Communique Janvier 2009 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 8) Communique Janvier 2010 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 9) Communique Janvier 2011 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 10) Communique Janvier 2012 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 11) Communique Janvier 2014 de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie (CASFM). 12) Committee de l Antibiogramme de la SFM, 2.0 Juillet 2015 (EUCAST).