INVENTORY OF GOLDEN EAGLE NESTS IN ELKO COUNTY, NEVADA

Similar documents
BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE GOLDEN EAGLE IN SOUTHWESTERN

Lynx Update May 25, 2009 INTRODUCTION

Wayne E. Melquist Idaho Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho 83843

ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND HOME-RANGE USE OF NESTING LONG-EARED OWLS

NORTHERN GOSHAWK NEST SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE COLORADO ROCKIES

Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) Productivity and Home Range Characteristics in a Shortgrass Prairie. Rosemary A. Frank and R.

Red-Tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Dall s Sheep Distribution and Abundance Study Plan Section Initial Study Report

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming

The Greater Sage-grouse: Life History, Distribution, Status and Conservation in Nevada. Governor s Stakeholder Update Meeting January 18 th, 2012

48 RAPTOR RESEARCH Vol. 15 No. 2. top. < 0.Sm > side HABITUATION TO HUMAN DISTURBANCE IN NESTING ACCIPITERS

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

2012 ANNUAL REPORT. Anthro Mountain Greater Sage-grouse

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

by L. W. Oliphant and W. J.P. Thompson c/o Department of Veterinary Anatomy University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N OWO

MOUNTAIN QUAIL TRANSLOCATIONS IN EASTERN OREGON

ECOSYSTEMS Wolves in Yellowstone

Bald Eagles in the Yukon. Wildlife in our backyard

Subject: Preliminary Draft Technical Memorandum Number Silver Lake Waterfowl Survey

Pikas. Pikas, who live in rocky mountaintops, are not known to move across non-rocky areas or to

The Long-term Effect of Precipitation on the Breeding Success of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri in the Judean and Negev Deserts, Israel

THE NESTING, REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, AND CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON RESIDUES IN THE RED-TAILED HAWK AND GREAT HORNED OWL IN SOUTH-CENTRAL MONTANA

Nesting Anna s Hummingbird Observations. At Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge February 2012 to June Beverly LaBelle

Ernst Rupp and Esteban Garrido Grupo Jaragua El Vergel #33, Santo Domingo Dominican Republic

Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata)

Nest Site Characteristics and Factors Affecting Nest Success of Greater Sage-grouse

Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge 2004 Bald Eagle Nesting and Productivity Survey

American Bison (Bison bison)

AN ASSESSMENTT OF THE BALD EAGLE AND GREAT BLUE HERON BREEDING POPULATIONS ALONG HIGH ROCK, TUCKERTOWN, NARROWS, AND FALLS RESERVOIRS

BROOD REDUCTION IN THE CURVE-BILLED THRASHER By ROBERTE.RICKLEFS

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

2017 Regional Envirothon

Mountain Quail Translocation Project, Steens Mountain Final Report ODFW Technician: Michelle Jeffers

Piping Plover. Below: Note the color of the sand and the plover s back.

Removal of Alaskan Bald Eagles for Translocation to Other States Michael J. Jacobson U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Juneau, AK

Canada Goose Nest Monitoring along Rocky Reach Reservoir, 2017

PEREGRINE FALCON HABITAT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES

ECOLOGY OF ISOLATED INHABITING THE WILDCAT KNOLLS AND HORN

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

PREY REMAINS IN NESTS OF FOUR CORNERS GOLDEN EAGLES,

Canada Goose Nest Monitoring along Rocky Reach Reservoir, 2016

2009 Eagle Nest News from Duke Farms eagle nest Written by Larissa Smith, Assistant Biologist

Who Am I? What are some things you can do to help protect my home? Track: Ohio Department of Natural Resources Photo: Cottonwood Canyons Foundation

Mountain Quail Translocation Project 2015

The Peregrine Falcon. BY: Alicia Saichareune

MOUNTAIN QUAIL TRANSLOCATIONS IN EASTERN OREGON

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

NORTHERN HARRIER Circus cyaneus

F RIEDMANN (1963) considers the Lark Sparrow (Chondestes grammacus)

PORTRAIT OF THE AMERICAN BALD EAGLE

SEALANT, WATERPROOFING & RESTORATION INSTITUTE SPRING PEREGRINE FALCONS: DIS RAPTORS OF WORK AT HEIGHT

Thefirst attempt at Brood Manipulation of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in Japan

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

Swainson s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni)

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

SOSSAMAN CLOUD PARK. Site Conditions

Dr. Nicki Frey, Utah state University

Rock Wren Nesting in an Artificial Rock Wall in Folsom, Sacramento County, California

Conservation Management of Seabirds

2012 Quail Season Outlook By Doug Schoeling, Upland Game Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Susitna Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY. Vo No. 1 ECOLOGY OF THE GOLDEN EAGLE. JERRY McG^H^

ATTACK SITE DESCRIPTION

BOBWHITE QUAIL HABITAT EVALUATION

Mountain Quail Translocation Project 2014

Nesting Swainson s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Area 2003 Annual Survey Results

ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit

Raptors. Raptor Ratios. SeaWorld/Busch Gardens. 4-8 Classroom Activities. April 2003

SPECIES AT RISK IN ALBERTA. Children s Activity Booklet

Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)

THE BIOLOGY AND NESTING DENSITY OF BREEDING AMERICAN KESTRELS,4ND LONG-EARED OWLS ON THE BIG LOST RIVER, SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO

Common Name: BALD EAGLE

This Coloring Book has been adapted for the Wildlife of the Table Rocks

Western Snowy Plover Recovery and Habitat Restoration at Eden Landing Ecological Reserve

Animal Speeds Grades 7 12

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

SHEEP AND PREDATOR MANAGEMENT

Swainson s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni)

Management of Sandhills rangelands for greater prairie-chickens

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

The Recent Nesting History of the Bald Eagle in Rondeau Provincial Park, Ontario.

GOLDEN EAGLE NEST SITE SELECTION AND HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELING ACROSS TWO ECOREGIONS IN SOUTHERN NEVADA. Sarah A. Weber, B.S.

2019 Broomfield Bald Eagle Watch Data Sheet

Amazing Animals. Created by. Mrs. Harding s First Grade

Ecology and Management of Ruffed Grouse and American Woodcock

Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management.

Kevin s rule of 3 for beginners

Photo by Drew Feldkirchner, WDNR

NESTING ECOLOGY OF THE LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE IN SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii

Look Who s. Flying! by Claudia Burns and Dave Horton

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE RED-TAILED HAWK STUART N. LUTT CH, LLOYD B. KEITH, AND J. D. STEPI-IENSON

ABSTRACT. (Grus canadensis tabida) that is currently listed as endangered by the Ohio Division of

The tailed frog has been found from sea level to near timberline ( m; Province of BC 1999).

Nest site characteristics and reproductive success of the Western Tanager (Piranga ludoviciana) on the Colorado Front Range

NEST SITE SELECTION AND PRODUCTIVITY OF GREAT HORNED. Thirty-three active nests (16 artificial, 17 natural) of the Great Horned Owl (Bubo

EFFECT OF PREY ON PREDATOR: VOLES AND HARRIERS

Montana Bald Eagle Nesting Populations and Nest Monitoring,

State birds. A comparison of the Northern Mockingbird and the Western Meadowlark. By Shaden Jensen

EIDER JOURNEY It s Summer Time for Eiders On the Breeding Ground

Transcription:

INVENTORY OF GOLDEN EGLE NESTS IN ELKO COUNTY, NEVD Jerry L. Page Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife Elko, Nevada Donald J. Seibert Bureau of Land Management Elko, Nevada bstract. During 1972, an inventory revealed 88 active golden eagle (quila chrysaetos), nesting sites in Elko County, Nevada. It was found that 93% of the nests were on cliffs, 71% between elevations of 5,000 and 6,500 feet, and 43% faced east. Locations of 84% of the nests were within two miles of water with desert riparian habitat. The success per nesting attempt was determined from 50 of the 88 active nests with a success ratio of 1.1 young per nest. INTRODUCTION Populations of numerous raptors have decreased in North merica in the last 25 years (Kochert 1972). Cahalane (1964), stated that man's encroachment into remote areas has endangered the future existence of some wild species. Craighead and Craighead (1956), concluded that man directly and indirectly represented the greatest factor in reducing nesting success of all raptors. There is a great need for information on the status of raptors, such as the golden eagle in North merica (Spofford 1969). Only by determining the present population and habitat of the golden eagle, can any reduction in population be recognized early and the possible causes isolated and evaluated (McGahan 1968, Spofford 1969). Nesting information has been compiled in western Montana by HcGahan (1965), and in Idaho by Kochert (1972). However, no nesting study or habitat evaluation has been conducted in northeastern Nevada. Because of the need to determine the present nesting population and to identify the present habitat distribution of golden eagles in northeastern Nevada, the U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife and the U. S. Bureau of Land Management, in cooperation with the CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 1

Figure I. Hap of Elko County, Nevada, and study area showing distribution of breeding pairs... Montello 0. Wells.'! ~.t'-.~. ~/\..... I) -- o 5 10 20 30 Ito /'(/'II LEGEND Breeding Pair. 1\ 0 Curr~ ' 0 Ht. Range 1\ Hajor Stream,-<\ CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 2

Nevada Department of Fish and Game and the U. S. Forest Service, initiated a study in Elko County, Nevada, to: (1) Provide an indication of the present golden eagle nesting population and nesting success; and (2) provide a fast, inexpensive inventory of the habitat being used by nesting golden eagles. CKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors are indebted to the Nevada Department of Fish and Game, U. s. Bureau of Land Management, U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife, and the U. S. Forest Service for making this cooperative project possible. Special thanks are extended to Leonard Hoskins and Merlin McColm of the Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Peter Test (presently employed by the Nevada Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada), and Jim Yoakum of the U. S. Bureau of Land Management, Joe Miner of the U. s. Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife, Dean Doell of the U. S. Forest Service, and Doctors Donald Klebenow and Fred Ryser of the University of Nevada for their assistance and guidance. STUDY RE This study area was Elko County, Nevada, which is approximately 17,000 square miles (Figure 1). Elevations range from 4,000 to 11,000 feet. Elko County has a wide temperature variation. The temperatures in the summer are around 90 degrees F., and in the winter are around -20 degrees F. Temperatures may vary 35 degrees during a 24-hour period. verage annual precipitation varies from under eight inches to over 25 inches, owing to elevation and proximity of mountains (U. S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau 1970, 1971). The lower basins are from 4,000 to 5,000 feet and occupy less than five percent of the county. The major vegetation species are greasewood (Sarcobatus spp.), and saltbrush (triplex spp.). The hilly, intermediate areas encompass 75% of the county. The elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet. The vegetative species are big sagebrush (rtemisia tridentata), black sagebrush<! nova), and rabbitbrush (Chrysothamus spp.). The highest elevations, ranging from 7,000 to 11,000 feet, comprise about 20% of the county. These are steep-rising mountain ranges, generally running in a north-south direction. The vegetation varies greatly with the elevation, however, the major vegetative types are: (1) mountain browse type consisting of mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus spp.), bitterbrush (Purshia spp.), snowberry (Symphoricarpos spp.), serviceberry (melachier spp.); (2) sagebrush-grass type consisting of sagebrush with various grasses; (3) pinyon-juniper type consisting of pinyon (Pinus spp.), juniper (Juniperus spp.); and (4) on favorable sites, broadleaf and conifer types consisting af aspen (Populus spp.) and fir (bies spp.). There are also small areas of bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata), on the major mountain ranges in the southeastern part of the county. ----- Throughout the county, desert riparian vegetation occurs between 5,000 and 9,000 feet elevations in a narrow strip along the streams. The major vegetation species included are willow (Salix spp.), rose (Rosa spp.), cottonwood (Populus spp.), and at the higher elevations, aspen. ---- gricultural practices have eliminated large areas of native vegetation on the flood plains of the major water courses. Cultivated hay meadows have replaced 10% of the native sagebrush-grass type. n additional 10% of the sagebrush-grass type has been either seeded to crested wheatgrass (gropyron cristatus), or burned, thus being converted to cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), or, in some cases, other native grasses (Bureau of Land Management, Elko District Economic Profile, unpublished). CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 3

Figure 2. Form used to record active eagle nest information. ELKO COUNTY EGLE NEST SITE INFORMTION 1. Species of eagle (golden or bald)=------------ 2. Elevation: -------------------------------------------- 3. Date of observation: ----------------------------------- 4. Estimated size of young (small, large or eggs): ----- 5. Was adult on nest: 6. Number of young or eggs: -- 7. Structure nest was on=------------------------- 8. Direction nest was facing: ------------------------------ 9. Habitat: Distance to nearest stream or water: ----------------- verage width of stream=------------------------ Vegetation along stream=------------------------------ Quality of riparian vegetation: Good Bad 10. Describe how to find nest: ----------------------------- 11. Township: Range:, Section: 12. Fledging count=------------------------------- Observer: CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 4

METHOD Eagles are characteristically extremely nervous when approached by man. During the incubation stage, they will fly off the nest when a human intruder comes near. Eagles are also known to abandon their nests during incubation stage after being visited by man (Kochert 1972). Boeker and Ray (1971), reported that human disturbance accounted for 85% of all known nest losses in their study in Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico. Therefore, most active golden eagle nests were originally located and rechecked for nesting success with a Piper Super-cub airplane. The remaining active nests were located by field personnel, on the ground, and later checked from the air. The white coloration from excretion helped to point out possible nest sites from the air. Nests were checked by flying approximately 50 feet from the nest at an approximate air speed of 50 m.p.h. The approach and distance to the nest depended upon wind direction, downdrafts and terrain. Each active nest was plotted on au. S. Geological Survey map, scale 1:250,000, and registered on an Elko County Eagle Nest Site Information Form (Figure 2). Nest elevations and exposures were recorded using the aircraft instruments. nest was considered to be active if it contained eggs, young or an incubating adult. Ground field personnel began inventorying active eagle nests about March 15, 1972. On this date, the first eagles were observed incubating eggs. erial searching for active nests in selected sites began on pril 15, 1972, and ended June 15, 1972. Main areas of aerial inventory were along rock escarpments adjacent to or near water courses or along mountain ranges where active eagle nest sites were expected. Other areas inventoried had tall fir, pine or cottonwood stands. sample of 50 nests were later rechecked from the air between May 28 and June 7, 1972, to determine average success per nesting attempt. Between these dates, the youngest nestlings had some of their primary plumage, but the oldest nestlings had not fledged. nestlings within these nests were recorded, totaled and divided by the sample number of nests. The resulting ratio was considered the average success per nesting attempt. ll RESULTS ND DISCUSSION bout one-half of Elko County, Nevada, was inventoried for golden eagle nests. The average success per nesting attempt was determined for 50 of the 88 nests. The ratio for the success per nesting attempt was 1.1 nestlings, or 55 young for the sample of 50 nests (Table 1). Kochert (1972), in Idaho, obtained an average of 1.18 young-fledged, over a six-year study. Nearly all pairs of eagles maintain more than one nest in this study. McGahan (1968), reported 56% of the nesting pairs in Montana maintained supernumerary nests. Dead sagebrush was the principal nesting material used in nest construction of two nests. Green juniper boughs and rabbitbrush were also commonly used in nest construction. Hinman (1960), reported that sagebrush was the major material used in nest construction in southwestern Utah. We observed eagles continually bring building materials to their nests prior to laying their eggs and after the eggs had hatched. This habit helped to cover uneaten and decaying food. One particular nest, situated on the ground, accumulated approximately six inches of litter in a five-week period after the young hatched. nother large nest fell off a rock archway destroying two eggs, apparehtly due to the next becoming too high and too large during the previous years. CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 5

Table 1. verage success per nesting attempt recorded May 28 through June 7, 1972. Number Nests Number Nestlings Observed verage/nest 50 55 1.1 Table 2. Number and percent active golden eagle nests in various Sites. Nest Sites Number Percent Ground 1 Tree 5 Cliff 82 TOTL 88 1 6 100 Table a. Elevation of active nests. ltitude (Feet) 4,000-5,000 y 5,000-5,500 5,500-6,000 6,000-6,500 6,500-7,000 7,000-7,500 7,500-8,000 S,000-8,5QO 8,500-11,000 Number of Nests 0 '21 20 22 8 10 6 1 0 1/ -Occupied less than 5% of Elko County and was flat bottom land. Table 4. Exposure of occupied cliff nests. North East South West Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 10 12 35 43 20 24 17 21 CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 6

Total active nests located were 88, of which, 93% were on cliffs (Table 2). McGahan (1968), found in Montana 62% of the nests were located on cliffs. Wellein and Ray (1964), found 87% of the occupied and unoccupied nests were on cliffs in Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico. In laska, 100% of the nests were on cliffs (Murie 1944). In the Elko County study, 71% of the total active nests ranged in elevation from 5,000 to 6,500 feet (Table 3). The mean nesting altitude was 6,100 feet. McGahan (1968), reported in the Montana study that 81% of all nests (occupied and unoccupied), were at altitudes between 4,000 and 6,000 feet. Beecham (1970), reported the mean nesting altitude for active golden eagle nests in southwestern Idaho was 3,700 feet. The highest active eagle nest site in the Elko County study was located at 8,400 feet. Exposure of nests seemed to be of importance. Of the nests located, 43% faced east and 24% faced south (Table 4). McGahan (1968), working in central Montana, reported that 50% of the nests studied had a southern exposure. His data suggested that nest-site preference was influenced by the directions of the sun's rays because of temperature. t the same. elevations, the more northern the latitude, the cooler the temperatures. Thus, to make use of all available heat, in McGahan's (1968) study, the eagles preferred the southern exposure. In the Elko study, the average daily temperature was higher, therefore, the eagles apparently preferred nesting sites with eastern exposures. One nest, situated on the ground, was located on the west side of a power pole. s soon as the nestling was able to move about, it left the nest and spent its remaining days (before it was eaten by a coyote), on the east side of the power pole, shading out the afternoon sun. Some nests with westerly exposures had rock crevices used by the eaglet as shade from the hot afternoon sun. Kochert (1972), reported that eight eaglets apparently died during his study from heat prostration in nests with a western and southern exposure. Water with desert riparian habitat, consisting of widely-scattered willows, rose and other ~- shrubs, as well as a mixture of forbs and grasses, were located within two miles of 84% ' of all active eagle nests. The remaining ~ 16% of the nests considered to have been more than 2 miles from water, could be closer due to lack of adequate information on water t locality. { ~ long the South Fork Humboldt River, South Fork Owyhee River, Salmon Falls Creek and Susie ~ Creek, where water with desert riparian habitat and suitable cliffs were present, most f active nests occurred within two miles of each other. In.two cases along two different ~ streams, active nests were recorded within three-quarters of a mile from their neighbor. t. In areas where suitable cliffs were present, but water was lacking, active nests were r absent or were several miles apart. ~ ~ Other studies (Kochert 1972, McGahan 1968, Wellein and Ray 1964), mentioned the use of ~ cliffs for nesting, but do not stress the need of water and/or desert riparian habitat. During the inventories, only one eagle left the nest when passed with the Piper Super-cub,.-but before the plane turned and flew back, the eagle had returned to the nest and was again incubating the eggs. Boeker (1970), reported that aircrafts do not seem to disturb the nesting activity of golden eagles. In this study, the aerial inventory technique had considerable advantage over ground inventory technique in obtaining general information as to nest location, habitat type, and nesting trend. The aerial method does not seem to disturb the nesting eagle. lso, the remoteness of most eagle nests makes inventory a long process when done on the ground, while by air, several nests can be visited in a very short period of time. n aerial inventory can also be conducted periodically over the same area to establish golden eagle nesting trends, similar to the eagle trend counts conducted by the U. S. Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife Research Center (Boeker and Ray 1971). Hickman (1972), reported that a Super-cub was the most efficient method of locating cliff nests. CL-NEV WILDLIFE 1973 7

LITERTURE CITED Beecham, J. J. 1970. Nesting ecology of the golden eagle in southwestern Idaho. M. S. Thesis. Univ. Idaho, Moscow. 48'p. Boeker, E. L. activity. 1970. Use of aircraft to determine golden eagle, guila chrysaetos, nesting Southwestern Nat. 15: 136-137. and Ray. 1971. Golden eagle populations studies in southwest. Condor. 73: 463- ---:476 7 Cahalane, V. H. 1964. Cougar, grissly, and wolf in North merica. N. Y. Zool. Soc. 12 p. Craighead, J. J, and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Harrisburg, Penn. 443 p. Hawks, owls, and wildlife. Stackpole Co., Hickman, G. L. 1972. erial determination of golden eagle nesting status. J. Wild!. Mgmt. 3b(4}: 1289-1292. Hinman, Robert. 1960. ntelope populations in southwestern Utah, with special reference to golden eagle predation. Unpubl. M. S. Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan. 61 p. Kochert, M. N. 1972. Population status and chemical contamination in golden eagles in southwestern Idaho. M. S. Thesis. Univ. Idaho, Moscow. 93 p. McGahan, J. 1965. Ecology of the golden eagle. M.. Thesis. Univ. Montana, Missoula. 78 P 1968. Ecology of the golden eagle. uk. 85: 1-12. Spofford, W. R. 1969. Problems of the golden eagles in North merica. In J. J. Hicked Col. Peregrine falcon populations: Their biology and decline. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison. p. 329, 346-347. Wellein, E. G. and T. Ray. 1964. Eagle investigation-new Mexico and western Texas. Wild!. Research Lab., Colorado....,., 8