Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Similar documents
Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

J. Dairy Sci. 90: doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

Vaccination strategies for reducing clinical severity of coliform mastitis

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Bacterin Toxoid on Clinical Coliform Mastitis

Charmany Dairy Herd Newsletter Oct. 29 th Nov. 4 th Daily Events

Mastitis cows and immunization

The use of on-farm culture systems for making treatment decisions

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

On-farm milk culture training workshop. Christina Petersson-Wolfe Department of Dairy Science Virginia Tech

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Dry Cow Vaccination. Maternity Pen. Timing. Colostrum Absorption. Failure of Passive Transfer

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR MILD AND MODERATE CASES OF CLINICAL MASTITIS. Carolina Pinzón-Sánchez

Consequences of Recorded and Unrecorded Transition Disease

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

Influence of Experimentally- induced clinical mastitis on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle

LOCAL TOLERANCE OF INTRAMAMMARY PREPARATIONS IN COWS

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

The Environment And Mastitis Control. What If the USA Lost the War in Iraq??? Dr. Andy Johnson. Western Canadian Dairy Conference Red Deer, Alberta

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Innovation in Mastitis Treatment

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

De Tolakker Organic dairy farm at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht, The Netherlands

MASTITIS, ANTIBIOTICS, AND RESISTANCE: A ROUND- TABLE DISCUSSION WITH DR. ROB TREMBLAY

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

Simple Herd Level BVDV Eradication for Dairy

Bovine Mastitis: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus in Small Holder Herds of Bench Maji Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Mastitis Prevention and Cure Rates in Heifers Treated with Spectramast Dry Cow Therapy and/or Orbeseal Dry Cow Teat Sealant

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

Charmany Dairy Herd Newsletter Oct. 8 th Oct. 14 th

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Milking behaviour in dairy cows naturally infected with clinical mastitis

Ubroseal Dry Cow 2.6 g intramammary suspension for cattle

CLINICAL MASTITIS PERCEPTIONS OF KANSAS DAIRY PRODUCERS. J.R. Roberson 1

Genetic parameters for pathogen specific clinical mastitis in Norwegian Red cows

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement

Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in small holder dairy farms in Selale, North Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia

Johne s Disease Control

Your clients need you to help them reach their full dairy potential.

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Ninth Annual Fall Dairy Conference November 12-13, 2008 Liverpool, NY. Happy Cows in New York. Proceedings

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Reduce exposure to environmental mastitis bacteria

Transcription:

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Masitis in Dairy.. Page 1 of 5 Related References: Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle Crist W, et al Mastitis and its control. US National Dairy Database [online]. College Park, MD: University of Maryland; 1997. Updated January 16, 1997. Kirk J, Mellenberger R Coliform-infected dairy cows. US National Dairy Database [online]. College Park, MD: University of Maryland; 1997. Updated January 16, 1997. Norman Habermehl, DVM, MBA, and Bruce Wren, DVM, PhD The Bottom Line! Coliform mastitis has an average incidence rate of 15% to 20% in herds with low somatic cell counts (SCC) and is implicated in 30% to 40% of clinical cases. It is a common cause of fatal mastitis in cattle.! The control of coliform mastitis is difficult, unreliable and frustrating in spite of the existence of apparently excellent management, and control should be focused on the prevention of new intramammary infections.! J-VAC is licensed for the vaccination of healthy cattle as an aid in protection against mastitis caused by Escherichia coli and the effects of endotoxemia caused by E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium.! Cattle vaccinated with J-VAC had a significant reduction of 81% in clinical coliform mastitis (P<0.001)! J-VAC can be a cost-effective management tool when clinical coliform mastitis (CCM) rates are more than one case per 100 lactations (1% lactational incidence rate). TSB-9-99011- FTB J-VAC is a registered trademark of Merial. 1998 Merial Limited. All rights reserved. Introduction Coliform mastitis has been reported worldwide, the result of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter aerogenes bacteria from the environment entering the mammary gland as an opportunistic invader. Eighty to 90% of these coliforms result in varying degrees of clinical mastitis, with 8% to 10% resulting in severe, systemic mastitis within the first weeks after calving. Fecal contamination of bedding has been associated with coliform mastitis caused by E. coli, while coliform mastitis caused by Klebsiella spp. is associated with wet sawdust and wood shavings.(1) Coliform mastitis has an average incidence rate of 15% to 20% in herds with low somatic cell counts (SCC) and is implicated in 30% to 40% of clinical cases. It is a common cause of fatal mastitis in cattle.(1) The control of coliform mastitis is difficult, unreliable and frustrating in

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Masitis in Dairy.. Page 2 of 5 spite of the existence of apparently excellent management. In the control of coliform mastitis, the emphasis is on the prevention of new infections. The vaccination of cows during the dry period and early lactation with an E. coli J5 vaccine has been demonstrated to be a practical management aid to reduce the incidence and severity of clinical coliform mastitis.(1) The objective of this field trial was to demonstrate the efficacy of a-dose vaccination programs with J-VAC vaccine, a commercially available J5 Escherichia coli bacterin-toxoid, for controlling clinical coliform mastitis (CCM) in lactating dairy cattle. The Field Trial A total of 731 dairy cows from four well-managed commercial Holstein herds was used in this trial. Each animal was randomly assigned to either the group that was vaccinated with J-VAC vaccine or a placebo treatment group. The cows in this study were of various age, parities and levels of milk production. Prepartum heifers were also included in the study. Herd owners, individuals collecting milk samples and the laboratories utilized for milk culture were not aware of the treatment group of any animal until the completion of the trial. A dry-cow vaccination protocol was utilized in two herds involving 203 cows. The cows received the initial dose of J-VAC or placebo at the beginning of the dry-off period, with the second dose being administered 1 to 3 weeks prior to calving. Heifers in these trials received an initial vaccination of J-VAC or placebo when estimated to be 7.5 months in gestation, with the second injection being given 1 to 3 weeks prior to calving. The vaccines were administered according to label directions and the trial was conducted over a period of 10 and 15 months. A whole-herd vaccination protocol was utilized in two other herds involving 530 1actating dairy and late gestational heifers. The initial J- VAC or placebo injection and subsequent second injection were given one month apart. These trials were conducted over a period of 4.5 months. Throughout the trials, all cases of clinical mastitis (identified by the milkers/herd managers) were defined by the presence of abnormal milk, udder inflammation and/or systemic disease. Prior to treatment, milk samples were aseptically collected and submitted to a bacteriology laboratory for culture and identification. All bacterial isolates from the clinical mastitis cases were identified biochemically. A quarter was diagnosed as having CCM if a pure culture of a coliform organism ( E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp.) was isolated and identified from milk samples collected from clinical cases of mastitis. Overall Results Subsequent to initial vaccination and booster injections, no abnormal local or systemic responses to vaccination were recorded in any of the animals involved in this trial.

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Masitis in Dairy.. Page 3 of 5 The clinical mastitis data from these trials were pooled and analyzed. There were 64 cases of clinical mastitis during this trial, representing a clinical mastitis incidence rate of 8.73% (Table 1). Coliform bacteria were isolated and identified from 24 clinical mastitis cases (37.5%). The aggregate clinical coliform mastitis (CCM) incidence rate was 3.27%. The group of 374 animals vaccinated with J-VAC experienced 4 CCM cases (1.07% incidence rate).the cattle vaccinated with J-VAC had a significant reduction of 81% in the incidence of clinical mastitis attributable to coliform intramammary infections (P<0.001). Table 1: Overall results Group Number #Herds Protocol CCM Incidence PVRF* P-value Rate Total 733 4 dry-cow 24 3.27% and J-VAC 374 4 1.07% wholeherd 20 <20% P<0.001 Placebo 359 5.57% *PVRF: Post-vaccination risk factor=(1- reduction in incidence). Table 2. Effect against E. coli Group Number E.coli Incidence Rate Total 733 12 1.64% J-VAC 374 2 0.53% Placebo 359 10 2.79% *PVRF: Post-vaccination risk factor=(1- reduction in incidence). PVRF* P-value <20% P<0.02 Escherichia coli was isolated from 12 cases of CCM during the trial, two from the 374 head vaccinated with J-VAC and 10 from the 359 head placebo-injected group (Table 2). The incidence rate was 0.53% and 2.79% respectively, Again, the data clearly demonstrate a significant reduction of 81% in the incidence of CCM caused by E. coli intramammary infections (P<0.02). Dry Cow Protocol Results In total, 109 of 203 head were vaccinated with J-VAC following a dry-cow vaccination protocol. None of the 109 animals vaccinated with J-VAC, while 7 of the 94 placebo-injected animals developed CCM during the trial. All of the coliform isolates were identified as E. coli. These data demonstrate that a dry-cow protocol administered at, or near, dry-off, and boostered 1 to 3 weeks prior to calving, significantly reduced

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Masitis in Dairy.. Page 4 of 5 the incidence of CCM (P< 0.005). Whole-Herd Protocol Results A whole-herd vaccination protocol was used in 530 head. Three of 265 animals vaccinated with J-VAC and 13 of 265 placebo-injected animals developed CCM during the trial. These data demonstrate that a wholeherd vaccination protocol, significantly reduced the overall incidence of CCM by 76.9% (P<0.025). Discussion In this trial, two herds were vaccinated with a "dry-cow" vaccination program and two herds were vaccinated with a "whole herd" vaccination program. Both programs effectively, and significantly reduced the incidence of clinical coliform mastitis in lactating dairy cattle (>80% and 76.9% respectively). The overall reduction in incidence of CCM is consistent with previous reports in the scientific literature. In these reports, were an experimentalmutant J5 E. coli bacterin toxoid incorporating Freund's incomplete adjuvant, given twice in the dry period and a third dose given within 14 days of of calving reduced the incidence rate of CCM by 80%.(2) In other words, dairy cows vaccinated with the experimental J5 E. coli bacterintoxoid had a post-vaccination risk of 20%, compared to non-vaccinated animals. An independent economic analysis, based upon reported literature results, concluded that implementation of J5 bacterin-toxoid vaccination programs would be cost-effective whenever herds experienced CCM at rates above 1% of lactations.(3) This trial clearly demonstrates that the 2 dose J-VAC program is equally effective as the 3-dose experimental J5 bacterin-toxoid program vaccine in reducing the incidence of CCM. A a-dose vaccination program offers considerable advantages to dairy producers by reducing the number of vaccinations required and eliminating the need for vaccinating postcalving dairy cows that are immuno-suppressed as a result of a negative energy balance and high levels of endogenous corticosteroids. Conclusions J-VAC is a cost-effective management tool that will greatly benefit mastitis control efforts in dairy herd that experience, or are likely to experience, CCM rates greater than one cow per 100 (1% lactational incidence rate). J-VAC is licensed for the vaccination of healthy cattle as an aid in protection against mastitis caused by E. coli and the effects of endotoxemia caused by E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium. References

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Masitis in Dairy.. Page 5 of 5 1. Radostitis, O., Blood, D. and Gay, C., Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 8th Edition. London, England: Balliere Tindall, 1994, 584-594. 2. Gonzalez, R., Cullor J, Jasper D et al. Prevention of clinical coliform mastitis in dairy cows by a mutant Escherichia coli vaccine. Can J Vet Res 1989. 53: 301-305. 3. Degraves F and Fetrow J. Partial budget analysis of vaccinating dairy cattle against coliform mastitis with an Escherichia coli J5 vaccine. JAVMA 1991. 199: 451-455 Return to Table of Contents Veterinary Professional Services, Merial Limited, 2100 Ronson Road, Iselin, NJ 08830-3077. Tel 1 888 637 4251