R.M. Ferreira 1,4, C.A. Rodrigues 2, H. Ayres 3, R.F. Mancilha 2, P.H. Franceschini 1, C.R. Esper 1, P.S. Baruselli 3,4. Abstract

Similar documents
Controlled Breeding Programs for Heifers

SYNCHRONIZATION OF FOLLICULAR WAVE EMERGENCE AND OVULATION FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES

North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 2

ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION AND THE CONTROL OF OVULATION. PCattle PSmall ruminants PPigs

Comparison of long-term controlled internal drug release-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in postpartum beef cows 1

Variation in Duration of Estrus. Dr. Michael Smith, Un. of Missouri August 17, Overview. Ovarian Structures Graffian follicle.

PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

Overview. Mike Smith presentation Oct. 8, 2014 ARSBC PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

Overview PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

ANESTRUS BUFFALO TREATMENT SUCCESS RATE USING GNRH

FOLLICULAR GROWTH PATTERN IN BUFFALOES SYNCHRONIZED TO ESTRUS WITH PROGESTERONE IMPREGNATED INTRAVAGINAL SPONGES

Luteolysis and Pregnancy Outcomes in Dairy Cows after Treatment with Estrumate or Lutalyse

Comparison in Effect of Heatsynch with Heat Detection Aids and CIDR-Heatsynch in Dairy Heifers

Synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle

SYNCHRONIZATION OF FOLLICULAR WAVE EMERGENCE, LUTEAL REGRESSION, AND OVULATION FOR FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN BEEF COWS AND HEIFERS

Regina Esterman 1 Brad Austin Steaven Woodall Erin McKinniss Joel Yelich

Second Insemination Breeding Strategies for Dairy Cows

Effects of Day of Cycle at Initiation of a Select Synch/CIDR + Timed-artificial Insemination Protocol in Suckled Angus and Brangus Cows

Erin McKinniss 1 Regina Esterman Steaven Woodall Brad Austin Joel Yelich

Estrous synchronization treatments in sheep: Brief update Atualização nos protocolos de sincronização do cio em ovinos

NORGESTOMET IMPLANTS ENHANCE EMBRYO SURVIVAL IN POSTPARTUM COWS: A PRELIMINARY REPORT

Failure of Gonadotropin Therapy to Induce Estrus in Gilts Treated with a GnRH Analog to Suppress Ovarian Activity

Purebred Cattle Series Synchronization of Estrus in Cattle

Estrous Synchronization Systems for Beef Heifers. Bob L. Larson, DVM, PhD, ACT

Nwakpu P.E., Obianwuna U., Olorunleke S., Uchewa, E.N.

The Effect of Ram Exposure on Uterine Involution and Luteal Function During the Postpartum Period of Hair Sheep Ewes in the Tropics 1

Archives of Veterinary Science ISSN X

Reproductive Vaccination- Deciphering the MLV impact on fertility

Evaluation of two progestogen-based estrous synchronization protocols in yearling heifers of Bos indicus Bos taurus breeding

A Thesis Presented to. the Faculty of the Graduate School. at the University of Missouri. In Partial Fulfillment. of the Requirements for the Degree

Comparison of the Efficiency and Accuracy of Three Estrous Detection Methods to Indicate Ovulation in Beef Cattle 1

Influence of Experimentally- induced clinical mastitis on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle

Acutely Restricting Nutrition Causes Anovulation and Alters Endocrine Function in Beef Heifers

Considerations Related to Heifer Management. Heifer Management CONTROL OF ESTRUS IN HEIFERS

Use of a synthetic progestogen in combination with a superovulatory. treatment for induction of synchronized estrus in seasonally anovular ewes.

C.A. Peterson, R.N. Summers, F.A. Ireland, T.F. Lock, D.B. Faulkner, and D.J. Kesler SUMMARY

268 J. Anim. Sci Vol. 92, E-Suppl. 2/J. Dairy Sci. Vol. 97, E-Suppl. 1

Induction of ovulation in nonlactating dairy cows and heifers using different doses of a deslorelin implant

Effects of PGF2 α and GnRH on Reproductive Performance of Cattle and Buffaloes in Thailand and Philippines

The use of a deslorelin implant (GnRH agonist) during the late embryonic period to reduce pregnancy loss

Understanding Postpartum Anestrus and Puberty

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT REVISED. School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland,

STEPHANIE L. PULLEY-JONES Post Oak Road Cell: (731) Nacogdoches, TX Office: (936)

ABSTRACT. The use of fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) provides producers with

Effects of progesterone, oestradiol benzoate and cloprostenol on luteal function in the heifer

Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 40 (4), , Jul. Aug Original Article

UNDERSTANDING FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION (FTAI) A GUIDE TO THE BENEFIT OF FTAI IN YOUR HERD DAIRY CATTLE

Oestrus Induction, Plasma Steroid Hormone Profiles and Fertility Response after CIDR and ecg Treatment in Acyclic Sahiwal Cows

NORGESTOMET AND ESTRADIOL VALERATE INDUCED LUTEOLYSIS IS DEPENDENT UPON THE UTERUS. C. A. Peterson, J. C. Huhn, and D. J. Kesler

Serum Progesterone Profiles in Saanen Crossbred Goats During a 5-day Progestin-Based Estrous Synchronization Protocol

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE FERTILITY IN NATURAL AND SYNCHRONIZED BREEDING PROGRAMS

Comparison of an oestrus synchronisation protocol with oestradiol benzoate and PGF2

Pregnancy rates after ewes were treated with estradiol-17β and oxytocin

Use of estradiol benzoate to induce ovulation in a short-term protocol for fixed-time AI in sheep

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Time of PMSG administration: Effect on progesterone and estradiol concentration in synchronized ewes.

Synchronizing Heats in Beef Cows and Heifers

Beef Cattle Handbook

Veterinary Science. Original Article. Introduction

Efficacy of CIDR or FGA Sponges with hcg Treatments on the Conception Rate and Prolificacy in Lori Ewes Out of the Breeding Season

MP383 Synchronization of Estrus in Cattle

Uterine contraction patterns and fertility in early postpartum ewes

Impact of puberty status and melengestrol acetate supplementation before the breeding period on reproductive efficiency of Bos indicus beef heifers 1

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

reproduction Cow-calf operations: calendar of operations Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 05

CEVA products for reproduction management

C. Fiol 1,3, R. Ungerfeld 2

Research Articles. The Effect of PMSG Treatment on Pregnancy Rates in Synchronized Heifers using Norgestomet Ear Implants

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Vajdi Hokmabad

CURRICULUM VITAE A. Personal B. Particulars of education C. Employment

Field solution for the Artificial Insemination of Ethiopian Sheep Breeds

STUDY THE RESPONSES OF PROGESTERONE ADMINISTRATION ON RESUMPTION OF CYCLICITY ON POST-PARTUM ANESTRUS BUFFALOES

Effectiveness of a Presynchronization Program Implemented on a Modern Dairy Facility. R. E. Thommen

Efficacy of an injection of dinoprost tromethamine when given subcutaneously on luteal regression in lactating Holstein cows

Nigerian Veterinary Journal

EFFECTS OF GNRH AND PROSTAGLANDIN COMBINED WITH A SHORT PROGESTIN REGIMEN ON THE SYNCHRONY OF ESTRUS AND OVULATION IN EWES DURING THE BREEDING SEASON

Follicular and ovulatory responses of the right versus left ovaries to ecg treatment in Shall Iranian ewes

Estrumate Prostaglandin in Beef Herds

International Journal of Modern Pharmaceutical IJMPR Research

Although it induces synchronized ovulation, hcg reduces the fertility of Santa Ines ewes submitted to TAI

Research Article IMPACT OF CIDR IN COMBINATION WITH DIFFERENT HORMONES FOR TREATMENT OF ANESTRUS IN BUFFALOES UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS IN HARYANA

STEAVEN A.WOODALL, JR.

ADJUSTMENT OF ECHOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPIC INSEMINATION TO THE REPRODUCTIVE PARTICULARITIES OF PLEVEN BLACKHEAD SHEEP

Proceedings of the Society for Theriogenology 2013 Annual Conference

Effects of Nutritional Environment on Percentage of Mature Weight at which Crossbred Heifers of Varying Proportion of Brahman Breeding Attain Puberty

Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and heifers

Heifer Reproduction. A Challenge with a Payback. Jerry Bertoldo, DVM. Extension Dairy Specialist NWNY Team CCE/PRO-DAIRY

ARTICLE HISTORY ABSTRACT

The he mpor mp tanc e of e Es E trous Detection on Re tion -ins insemination of Lac tating Dair Dair Cows

The estrous cycle. lecture 3. Dr. Wafer M. Salih Dr. Sadeq J. Zalzala Dr. Haydar A. AL-mutar Dr. Ahmed M. Zakri

Mastitis and the link to infertility

Estrous Synchronization in Lactating Cows

Replacement Heifer Development. Changing Minds for the Change In Times Brian Huedepohl, DVM Veterinary Medical Center Williamsburg, Iowa

Available online at Received 17 October 2011; received in revised form 21 March 2012; accepted 22 March 2012

PHENOTYPIC DATA COLLECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN REPLACEMENT BEEF HEIFERS D.J. Patterson and J.E. Decker University of Missouri

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF PROGESTERONE CIDR DEVICES ON CIRCULATING LEVELS OF PROGESTERONE IN CYCLIC EWES. A Thesis MICHAEL CAREY SATTERFIELD

WHY DO DAIRY COWS HAVE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? HOW CAN WE SOLVE THOSE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? Jenks S. Britt, DVM 1. Why Manage Reproduction?

ABSTRACT. postpartum multiparous beef cattle have always been difficult to re-breed. Estrous

TREATMENT OF ANOESTRUS IN DAIRY CATTLE R. W. HEWETSON*

Managing Reproduction in the Cowherd

Transcription:

Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./Sept. 2006 Effect of synchronizing ovulation in cattle administered a norgestomet ear implant in association with ecg and estradiol treatments on pregnancy rate after fixed-time embryo transfer R.M. Ferreira 1,4, C.A. Rodrigues 2, H. Ayres 3, R.F. Mancilha 2, P.H. Franceschini 1, C.R. Esper 1, P.S. Baruselli 3,4 1 Department of Preventive Veterinarian Medicine and Animal Reproduction, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. 2 SAMVET, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. 3 Department of Animal Reproduction, FMVZ/USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Abstract This study evaluated the effect of changing the day of administration of ecg and d-cloprostenol (PGF) and the replacement of estradiol benzoate (EB) with estradiol cypionate (EC) in fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET) protocols in order to simplify embryo recipient management. Three-hundred cycling heifers (Bos taurus x Bos indicus) were allocated to one of three groups. On a random day of the estrous cycle (D0), all groups received 2 mg of EB and an ear implant containing 3 mg of norgestomet, which was removed on D8. The control group (G-C; n = 100) received 400 IU of ecg and 150 µg of PGF on D5 and 1 mg of EB on D9. Group EB (G-EB; n = 100) received a similar protocol, but D5 treatments were postponed until D8. Group EC (G-EC; n = 100) received the same treatments as G-EB, except for the replacement of EB on D9 with 0.5 mg of EC on D8. Ultrasonographic determination of the number and area of corpora lutea (CLs) was performed on D17 for all groups and was followed by embryo transfer. Recipients with multiple CLs or a single CL 15 mm in diameter received an in vitro produced embryo. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography 23 d after embryo transfer. Transferred-to-treated rate was similar among groups (G-C = 92.0%, G-EB = 93.0%, and G-EC = 96.0%). However, pregnant-to-transferred and pregnant-totreated rates were higher (P = 0.03) in G-EC [61.5% (59/96) and 59.0% (59/100)] than in G-C [45.6% (42/92) and 42.0% (42/100)] and G-EB [45.2% (42/93) and 42.0% (42/100)]. As expected, multiple ovulation rate (multiple ovulation-to-treated) in G-C (31.0%) was higher (P = 0.002) than in G-EB (11.0%) and G-EC (13.0%). In conclusion, the modifications to the conventional protocol of FTET reduced animal handling and increased pregnancy rates. Keywords: fixed-time embryo transfer, norgestomet, pregnancy rate, ecg, estradiol cypionate. Introduction Recipients play an important role in the success of embryo transfer (ET) programs. However, the high cost of maintaining recipients and the time and labor to accomplish all treatments in a fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET) protocol limit the widespread application and the success of this technology (Bó et al., 2002). Previous studies have shown that by using the Ovsynch protocol (Baruselli et al., 2000b) or a progesterone (P4)-releasing intravaginal device (Tríbulo et al., 2000; Baruselli et al., 2000a; 2001; Bó et al., 2001) it is possible to precisely manipulate follicular and luteal dynamics, thus abolishing the need for estrus detection for artificial insemination (AI; Baruselli et al., 2002; Martinez et al., 2002; Bó et al., 2003) and for ET. One approach to increase the overall pregnancy rate is to elevate circulating progesterone concentrations by single or multiple ovulations induced by administration of ecg in association with a P4-releasing intravaginal device during an ovulation synchronization protocol (Fuentes and De la Fuente, 1997; Baruselli et al., 2000a; 2001; Tríbulo et al., 2002). This procedure is supported by several studies that found a positive correlation between serum progesterone concentrations and pregnancy rates in cattle (Binelli, et al., 2001; Thatcher et al., 2001; Bó et al., 2002). Recently, Looney et al. (2006) reported various protocols using ecg or hcg treatments to increase plasma progesterone concentrations and improve pregnancy rates. Higher progesterone concentrations have also been associated with increased embryo development and the capacity of the conceptus to produce interferon-τ (Mann et al., 1999), thus improving conception rates (Fuentes and De La Fuente, 1997; Baruselli et al., 2001; Santos et al., 2000; Marques et al., 2003). A luteotrophic effect of ecg was also reported in Bos indicus x Bos taurus embryo recipients by increasing both progesterone concentrations and pregnant-to-transferred rates (Baruselli et al., 2000a). In crossbred Bos taurus x Bos indicus recipients, a conventional synchronization protocol consists of insertion of a P4-releasing intravaginal device plus administration of 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) i.m. on a random day of the estrous cycle (designated D0) to synchronize follicular wave emergence, ecg to stimulate follicular growth, d-cloprostenol (PGF) on D5 to induce luteolysis, P4-releasing intravaginal device withdrawal 4 Corresponding author: robertinhavet@yahoo.com.br; barusell@usp.br Received: June 1, 2006 Accepted: November 28, 2006

on D8, 1 mg of EB 24 h later to synchronize ovulation, and FTET on D17 (Baruselli et al., 2000a). Rodrigues et al. (2004) found that the norgestomet ear implant and EB treatment on D0 synchronized follicular wave emergence and ovulation in heifers destined for FTET. One attempt to improve ovulation rate was the administration of estradiol 24 h after device withdrawal, in order to induce a synchronized LH peak (Hanlon et al., 1996; Macmillan and Burke, 1996; Martínez et al., 1999). The administration of EB increased, hastened, and synchronized ovulation of treated Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers (Marques et al., 2003). Colazo et al. (2003) reported that estradiol cypionate (EC) administration at the time of P4-releasing intravaginal device removal induced a synchronous ovulation of the dominant follicle when the follicular wave was synchronized with estradiol-17β (E-17β) on D0. Preliminary studies on follicular dynamics in Bos indicus cattle (Reis et al., 2004; Martins et al., 2005) showed that EC administration at the time of device removal promoted synchronized ovulations approximately 70 h later, similar to EB administration 24 h after device withdrawal. This finding reinforced the notion of the ability of EC to synchronize ovulation. Penteado et al. (2005) also compared the use of EC or EB to synchronize ovulation in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) programs using P4-releasing intravaginal devices and achieved higher pregnancy rates using EC. Marques et al. (2004), in similar study, and Ayres et al. (2006), having used a norgestomet ear implant, obtained similar results with both compounds. Despite advances in conventional recipient synchronization protocols in FTET programs, recipient synchronization still requires frequent animal handling, which may reduce program efficiency. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the use of a norgestomet ear implant in addition to EB or EC treatment and to evaluate the effect of delaying the administration of ecg and PGF from D5 to D8 in FTET protocols. The purpose of these modifications was to reduce the handling and labor required. Null hypotheses were: (1) recipients that receive ecg treatment on D5 or D8 (in a protocol using a norgestomet ear implant) would have the same efficiency (transferred-to-treated, pregnant-to-transferred, and pregnant-to-treated rates) and (2) the replacement of EB on D9 with EC on D8 would not affect efficiency. Farm and animals Materials and Methods This experiment was conducted at a commercial farm in southwest Brazil (22 o 01 27 S and 47 o 53 19 W) during August 2005. Crossbred Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers (n = 300) without previous service, from 24 to 32 mo of age, having a mean body weight of 315 kg, with ovarian cyclicity (presence of a corpus luteum confirmed by ultrasonography), free from brucellosis and tuberculosis, and vaccinated against leptospirosis, foot and mouth disease, clostridiosis, IBR, BVD, PI 3, and BRSV, were selected. The experiment was performed in three replicates (n = 126, n = 120, and n = 54, respectively). All animals were kept on pasture, supplemented with good quality mineral salt, and had ad libitum access to water. Ovulation synchronization and treatments At the beginning of each replicate, heifers were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups (n = 100/group). At unknown stages of the estrous cycle (D0), all heifers received a norgestomet ear implant (Crestar, Intervet, Netherlands) plus 2 mg of EB i.m. (Estrogin, Farmavet, Brazil) given concurrently. On D5, the control group (G-C) animals received 400 IU of ecg i.m. (Folligon ; Intervet, Netherlands) and 150 µg of d-cloprostenol i.m. (PGF; Preloban ; Intervet, Netherlands). On D8, the ear implant was removed and 1 mg of EB (i.m.) was administered 24 h later (D9; Fig. 1). Group EB (G-EB) received the same protocol used for G-C, except for the administration of ecg and PGF at the time of ear implant removal (D8). Group EC (G-EC) received the same protocol as G-EB, but the EB given on D9 was replaced by the administration of 0.5 mg of EC i.m. (E.C.P. ; Pfizer, Brazil) on D8. In the absence of estrus detection, D10 was considered the day of estrus. Embryo transfer of an in vitro produced embryo was performed for all groups on D17 for recipients with a corpus luteum (CL). Ultrasonographic examinations On D17 (day of ET), both ovaries were examined using transrectal ultrasonography (Aloka SSD-500 console equipped with a 5 MHz linear transducer; Tokyo, Japan) to detect the presence of CLs, number of CLs, and the area of a single CL. In heifers with a single CL, the image with the largest CL diameter was frozen, and its area (including the cavity, when present) was estimated using software integrated in the scanner. In heifers with more than one CL, area of the CL was not measured. Only heifers with more than one CL or a single CL > 15 mm in diameter were selected to receive an embryo. Ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnosis was done 23 d after ET. In vitro embryo production and transfer Embryos were produced in vitro by a commercial Brazilian company, following standard protocols as previously reported (Dayan et al., 2002). Twenty-one donors and semen of four bulls were used (21 different in vitro fertilization processes) to produce threehundred embryos which were transferred during the experiment. The same sires were used in all replicates, and only Grade-1 blastocysts were used. All embryos were transferred non-surgically into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL by the same veterinarian on D17. Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./Sept. 2006 371

Group control (G-C): EB (2 mg) ecg (400 IU) + PGF Implant removal EB (1 mg) Embryo transfer Norgestomet Day 0 Day 5 Day 8 Day 9 Day 17 Group estradiol benzoate (G-EB): Implant removal EB (2 mg) + ecg (400 IU) Embryo transfer + PGF Norgestomet EB (1 mg) Day 0 Day 8 Day 9 Day 17 Group estradiol cypionate (G-EC): Implant removal EB (2 mg) + ecg (400 IU) + PGF Embryo transfer + EC (0.5 mg) Norgestomet Day 0 Day 8 Day 17 Figure 1. Schemes of treatment protocols (G-C, G-EB and G-EC) for fixed-time embryo transfer recipients. (EB, estradiol benzoate; EC, estradiol cypionate). Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS System for Windows (SAS, 2000). Effects of replicates, sires, and interactions between replicates and treatments were analyzed. Discrete Dependent variables (i.e. number of CLs and area of a single CL) were analyzed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure. A chi-square test was used to compare rates of transferred-to-treated, pregnant-to-transferred, pregnant-to-treated, and multiple ovulations (multiple ovulation-to-treated) among groups. Results There were no significant effects of replicate, sire, or an interaction between replicate and treatment. The effect of treatment on the number of CLs and CL area, transferred-to-treated, pregnant-to-transferred, pregnant-to-treated, and multiple ovulation rates are shown (Table 1). Heifers from Group G-C had the highest multiple ovulation response and consequently, the highest mean number of CLs. Treatment with ecg on D5 (G-C) produced a greater CL area compared to ecg administration on D8 (G-EB and G-EC, Table 1). The proportion of recipients that received an embryo to those treated was not influenced (P > 0.05) by the alternative treatments when compared to the conventional one. However, the overall pregnant-totransferred and pregnant-to-treated rates were higher in recipients from group G-EC (P < 0.05, Table 1). 372 Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./Sept. 2006

Table 1. Mean (± SD) outcomes in three groups of recipient heifers given a norgestomet ear implant and 2 mg of EB (Day 0). Groups 1 G-C G-EB G-EC P value Transferred-to-treated rate (%) 92.0 (92/100) 93.0 (93/100) 96.0 (96/100) > 0.05 Pregnant-to-transferred rate (%) 45.6 (42/92) a 45.2 (42/93) a 61.5 (59/96) b 0.03 Pregnant-to-treated rate (%) 42.0 (42/100) a 42.0 (42/100) a 59.0 (59/100) b 0.02 Mean number of corpora lutea 1.51 ± 0.89 b 1.11 ± 0.32 a 1.19 ± 0.64 a 0.0002 Mean area of single corpus luteum (mm 2 ) 3.55 ± 0.99 b 3.14 ± 0.86 a 3.21 ± 0.94 a 0.03 Multiple ovulation rate (%) 31.0 (31/100) b 11.0 (11/100) a 13.0 (13/100) a 0.002 1 In group G-C, heifers were given 400 IU of ecg and PGF on Days 5 (implant removal on Day 8), and 1 mg of EB on Day 9. In the other two groups, Day 5 treatments were given on Day 8, with 0.5 mg of EC on Day 8 (in lieu of EB on Day 9) in group G-EC. a, b Different letters within rows differ significantly. Discussion The impetus for this study was the possibility to simplify available protocols for FTET. Both null hypotheses were supported; changing the day of ecg administration from D5 (G-C) to D8 (G-EB) in Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers treated with a norgestomet ear implant and replacing EB on D9 with EC on D8 had no effect on efficiency of FTET programs. These changes eliminated handling the cattle on two occasions. Furthermore, pregnancy rates were significantly higher in animals in which ovulation was synchronized using EC at the time of implant removal (G-C) than in those of the other two groups. In this study, we chose to use a norgestomet ear implant to minimize suppression of follicular growth. Norgestomet does not inhibit LH pulse frequency in contrast to a P4-releasing intravaginal device, which suppressed LH pulsatility and follicular growth as shown by the elegant findings of Kinder et al. (1996) and Rathbone et al. (2001). In a previous study of follicular dynamics that used cycling Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers treated with a norgestomet ear implant or P4-releasing intravaginal device (CIDR), follicular growth, maximum diameter of the dominant follicle, and ovulation rate were higher in norgestomet-treated heifers (Sá Filho et al., 2005). Furthermore, Torres- Junior et al. (2005) synchronized cycling heifers with a norgestomet ear implant with or without PGF administration on D0 and the data supported that of the aforementioned work. The addition or not of PGF did not significantly effect dominant follicle diameter on D8, dominant follicle maximum diameter, ovulatory follicle diameter, ovulation rate, or the interval between implant removal and ovulation. The authors suggested a lack of a suppressive effect of the norgestomet ear implant when the animals were treated either with or without the presence of CL. Similar to our study, Reis et al. (2004) and Nasser et al. (2004) changed the day of ecg treatment from D5 to D8 but used a P4-releasing intravaginal device; they reported a reduction in transferred-totreated, pregnant-to-transferred, and pregnant-to-treated rates. This reduction may have been due to higher progesterone concentrations reached during the treatment (P4-releasing intravaginal device plus a CL) resulting in suppression of the dominant follicle (Adams et al., 1992; Rathbone et al., 2001). This inhibitory effect of progesterone on follicular growth in synchronized heifers was confirmed by Carvalho (2004), and it was more pronounced in Bos indicus cattle; these animals, in particular, had higher concentrations of progesterone compared to Bos taurus cattle subjected to a similar treatment and management. Therefore, the success achieved in the present study following changing the day of ecg treatment from D5 to D8 was attributed to the use of norgestomet, but this is not recommended for progesterone-based protocols. Estradiol cypionate treatment at the time of ear implant removal produced a satisfactory transferred-totreated rate and a higher pregnancy rate compared to G- C and G-EB. The higher pregnancy rate obtained in the EC-treated group may be related to increased time of exposure to estradiol during the period of follicular development immediately preceding ovulation, which is critical to enhance luteal lifespan (Day et al., 1990). Attainment of a threshold concentration of estradiol during the pre-ovulatory period is necessary to allow adequate CL formation and maintenance. Potential sites of action for estradiol are numerous, including direct actions on follicular development, effects on uterine function during either the pre-or post-ovulatory period, and alteration of endocrine support for folliculogenesis (Day et al., 1990). Based on studies of follicular dynamics, it does not seem to be relevant whether EC is given at device withdrawal or EB is given 24 h later; the efficiency to synchronize ovulation 70 h after progesterone source Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./ Sept. 2006 373

removal was similar for both compounds (Reis et al., 2004; Martins et al., 2005). In a recent study using EC for FTAI in Nelore cows, similar pregnancy rates were achieved with EC at the time of implant removal (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or EB 24 h later (Ayres et al., 2006). Similarly, in the present study, EC at the time of implant removal was highly efficacious in a FTET protocol. Estradiol cypionate was previously used to synchronize ovulation in heifers in FTAI protocols that used a P4-releasing intravaginal device (Colazo et al., 2003). In that study, synchronized follicular-wave emergence using a P4-releasing intravaginal device plus E-17β on D0 and induction of ovulation using 0.5 mg of EC, given at device removal or 24 h later, resulted in synchronous ovulation and acceptable pregnancy rates. These data were in agreement with Marques et al. (2003), who used the same protocol in Nelore cows. Furthermore, similar to our results, Penteado et al. (2005) reported higher pregnancy rates with 1.0 mg of EC at P4-releasing intravaginal device removal than with EB 24 h later in FTAI protocols using Nelore cows (49.4% vs. 41.4%, respectively). Despite such favorable results in the present study, further studies are necessary to confirm whether the improvement in pregnancy rate could be attributed to EC. In summary, the protocol that used a norgestomet ear implant with EB at implant insertion and PGF, ecg, and EC at implant removal on D8 was successfully used for FTET in Bos indicus x Bos taurus recipients. This protocol resulted in a satisfactory proportion of recipients selected and higher pregnancy rates when compared to G-C and G-EB, thus optimizing the use of recipients and facilitating the utilization of ET technology. These changes not only reduced the frequency of animal handling but also increased pregnancy rates. Acknowledgments Authors are grateful to the owners and employees of Fazenda Santa Rita and Fazenda Ibicatu, Descalvado/SP, Fazenda Santa Eliza, Analândia, SP for infrastructure and animal care, Intervet of Brazil for supporting the research, and to Dr. S.R.G. Ferreira for critical review. References Adams GP, Matteri RL, Ginther OJ. 1992. The effect of progesterone on growth of ovarian follicles, emergence of follicular waves and circulating FSH in heifers. J Reprod Fertil, 95:627-640. Ayres H, Penteado L, Torres-Júnior JR, Souza AH, Baruselli PS. 2006. Taxa de concepção de vacas nelore lactantes sincronizadas com implante auricular de progestágeno associado ao benzoato ou ao cipionato de estradiol. Acta Sci Vet, 34:410. (abstract). Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Carvalho NAT, Madureira EH, Campos Filho EP. 2002. Efeito de diferentes protocolos de inseminação artificial em tempo fixo na eficiência reprodutiva de vacas de corte lactantes. Rev Bras Reprod Anim, 26:218-221. Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Madureira EH, Costa Neto WP, Grandinetti RR, Bó GA. 2001. Increased pregnancy rates in embryo recipients treated with CIDR-B devices and ecg. Theriogenology, 55:157. (abstract). Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Madureira EH, Costa Neto WP, Grandinetti RR, Bó GA. 2000a. Superestimulação ovariana de receptoras de embriões bovinos visando o aumento de corpos lúteos, concentração de P4 e taxa de prenhez. Arq Fac Vet UFRGS, 28:218. (abstract). Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Carvalho NAT, Valentim R, Berber RCA, Carvalho Filho AF, Madureira EH, Costa Neto WP. 2000b. Aumento da taxa de prenhez em receptoras de embrião bovino pela utilização do protocolo ovsynch com inovulação em tempo fixo. Arq Fac Vet UFRGS, 28:216. (abstract). Binelli M, Thatcher WW, Mattos R, Baruselli PS. 2001. Antiluteolytic strategies to improve fertility in cattle. Theriogenology, 56:1451-1463. Bó GA, Baruselli PS, Martinez MF. 2003. Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle. Anim Reprod Sci, 78:307-326. Bó GA, Tríbulo H, Caccia M, Tríbulo R. 2001. Pregnancy rates in embryo recipients treated with progesterone vaginal devices and transferred without estrus detection. Theriogenology, 55:357. (abstract). Bó GA, Baruselli PS, Moreno D, Cutaia L, Caccia M, Tríbulo R, Tríbulo H, Mapletoft RJ. 2002. The control of follicular wave development for selfappointed embryo transfer programs in cattle. Theriogenology, 57:53-72. Carvalho JBP. 2004. Sincronização da ovulação com dispositivo intravaginal de progesterona (CIDR ) em novilhas B. indicus, B.indicus x B.taurus e B. taurus [in Portuguese]. São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo. Dissertation (Doctoral thesis). Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Mapletoft RJ. 2003. Effects of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on ovarian follicular dynamics, synchrony of ovulation, and fertility in CIDR-based, fixed-time AI programs in beef heifers. Theriogenology, 60:855-865. Day ML, Dyer RM, Wilson GW, Pope WF. 1990. Influence of estradiol on duration of anestrus and incidence of short estrous cycles in postpartum cows. Dom Anim Endocrinol, 7:19-25. Dayan A, Watanabe MR, Ferraz ML, Meirelles FV, Watanabe YF. 2002. Influence of the embryo stage, development kinetics and recipient synchronization on pregnancy rates of OPU-IVP embryos. Theriogenology, 57:492. (abstract). Fuentes S, De la Fuente J. 1997. Different synchronization treatments for direct embryo transfer to recipient heifers. In: Proceedings of the 13 th Annual 374 Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./ Sept. 2006

Meeting of the European Embryo Transfer Association, 1997, Lyon, France. Lyon: AETE. pp.148. (abstract). Hanlon DW, Williamson NB, Wichtel JJ, Steffert IJ, Craigie AL, Pfeiffer DU. 1996. The effect of estradiol benzoate administration on estrous response and synchronized pregnancy rate in dairy heifers after treatment with exogenous progesterone. Theriogenology, 45:775-785. Kinder JE, Kojima FN, Bergfeld EGM, Wehrman ME, Fike KE. 1996. Progestin and estrogen regulation of pulsatile LH release and development of persistent ovarian follicles in cattle. J Anim Sci, 74:1424-1440. Looney CR, Nelson JS, Schneider HJ, Forrest DW. 2006. Improving fertility in beef cow recipients. Theriogenology, 65:201-209. Macmillan KL, Burke CR. 1996. Effects of estrous cycle control on reproductive efficiency. Anim Reprod Sci, 42:307-320. Mann GE, Lamming GE, Robinson RS, Wathes DC. 1999. The regulation of interferon-τ production and uterine hormone receptors during pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil, 54:317-328. Marques MO, Ayres H, Reis EL, Mapletoft RJ, Baruselli PS. 2004. Efeito do cipionato e do benzoato de estradiol na taxa de prenhez de vacas nelore inseminadas em tempo fixo. Acta Sci Vet, 32:222. (abstract). Marques MO, Nasser LF, Silva RCP, Bó GA, Baruselli PS. 2003. Increased pregnancy rates in Bos taurus x Bos indicus embryo recipients with treatments to increase plasma progesterone concentration. Theriogenology, 59:369. (abstract). Martins CM, Castricini ESC, Sá Filho MF, Gimenes LU, Baruselli PS. 2005. Dinâmica folicular de vacas nelore tratadas com Cipionato ou Benzoato de estradiol em protocolos de inseminação artificial em tempo fixo. Acta Sci Vet, 33:285. (abstract). Martinez MF, Adams GP, Bergfelt D, Kastelic JP, Mapletoft RJ. 1999. Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in heifers. Anim Reprod Sci, 57:23-33. Martinez MF, Kastelic JP, Adams GP, Cook RB, Olson WO, Mapletoft RJ. 2002. The use of progestins in regiments for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. Theriogenology, 57:1049-1059. Nasser LF, Reisa EL, Oliveira MA, Bó GA, Baruselli PS. 2004. Comparison of four synchronization protocols for fixed-time bovine embryo transfer in Bos indicus x Bos taurus recipients. Theriogenology, 62:1577-1584. Penteado L, Sá Filho MF, Martins CM, Gimenes LU, Ayres H, Baruselli PS. 2005. Variação na taxa de concepção de vacas nelore lactantes sincronizadas com dispositivo intravaginal de progesterona associado ao benzoato ou ao cipionato de estradiol. Acta Sci Vet, 33:260. (abstract). Rathbone MJ, Kinder JE, Fike K. 2001. Recent advances in bovine reproductive endocrinology and physiology and their impact on drug delivery system design for the control of the estrous cycle in cattle. Adv Drug Del Rev, 50:277-320. Reis EL, Gimenes LU, Marques MO, Carvalho JBP, Mapletoft RJ, Baruselli PS. 2004. Efeitos do Cipionato e do Benzoato de estradiol na dinâmica folicular e luteínica de vacas nelore. Acta Sci Vet, 32:236. (abstract). Rodrigues CA, Ayres H, Reis EL, Madureira EH, Baruselli PS. 2004. Aumento da taxa de prenhez em vacas Nelore inseminadas em tempo fixo com o uso de ecg em diferentes períodos pós-parto. Acta Sci Vet, 32:220. (abstract). Sá Filho MF, Gimenes LU, Ayres H, Carvalho JB, Carvalho NAT, Baruselli PS. 2005. Dinâmica folicular de novilhas Bos indicus tratadas com implante auricular de Norgestomet ou com dispositivo intravaginal de progesterona. Acta Sci Vet, 33:266. (abstract). Santos JEP, Thatcher WW, Poll L, Overton MW, Reynolds JP. 2000. Human chorionic gonadotropin influences numbers of corpora lutea, plasma progesterone and conception rates of dairy cows. In: Proceedings of the 14 th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm: ICAR. vol.1, pp.144. (abstract). SAS user s guide: statistics version 8.0. 2000. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Thatcher WW, Moreira F, Santos JEP, Mattos RC, Lopez FL, Pancarci SM, Risco CA. 2001. Effects of hormonal treatments on reproductive performance and embryo production. Theriogenology, 55:75-90. Torres-Júnior JRS, Sá Filho MF, Gimenes LU, Madureira EH, Baruselli PS. 2005. Efeito da administração de PGF2α no início do tratamento com implante auricular de Norgestomet na dinâmica folicular de novilhas nelore (Bos indicus). Acta Sci Vet, 33(1):262. (abstract). Tríbulo H, Moreno D, Cutaia L, Gatti G, Tríbulo R, Caccia M, Bó GA. 2002. Pregnancy rates in embryo recipients treated with progesterone vaginal device and ecg and transferred without estrus detection. Theriogenology, 57:563. (abstract). Tríbulo H, Bó GA, Gatti G, Tegli JC, Cutaia, L, Moreno D, Brito M, Tríbulo R. 2000. Pregnancy rates in embryo recipients treated with Estradiol benzoate and CIDR-B vaginal device to eliminate the need for estrus detection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Stockholm. Sweden. Stockholm: ICAR. vol.2, pp.115. (abstract) Anim. Reprod., v.3, n.3, p.370-375, Jul./ Sept. 2006 375