Safety and Accuracy Assessment of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Platforms for the Detection of Biological Threats

Similar documents
Safety and Accuracy of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization - Time of. Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to Identify Highly Pathogenic

Vitek QC Sets. Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Microbial DNA qpcr Array Respiratory Infections

Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory Your One Health Partner. Bruce L. Akey DVM MS Interim Director

Biological Threat Fact Sheets

CultiControl. Technical Sheet 01

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

CULTURE-BASED ID FOR AGENTS OF BIOTERRORISM IN THE ERA OF MALDI- TOF MS

Lessons Learned from Proficiency Testing and Exercises

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

QuALiTy COnTrOL MiCrOOrGAnisMs C A T A L O G 1

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Pathogens commonly isolated from selected diseases

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

17June2017. Parampal Deol, Ph.D, MBA Senior Director, R&D Microbiology North America

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol Vegetative Bacteria

Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol for Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria, including Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria

PLEASE DELIVER UPON RECEIPT to LAB DIRECTOR or LAB MANAGER

CultiControl. Technical Sheet 01

Recommendations Regarding Use of Rapid Blood Pathogen Identification Panel Data

Infection Linelist. Infections Occurred Between 10/1/ :00:00 AM To 11/1/ :00:00 AM 2RCW2. Gastroenteritis (Adult) Urinary Tract

SYMMETRY FOAMING HAND SANITIZER with Aloe & Vitamin E Technical Data

Study Type of PCR Primers Identified microorganisms

Summary of Investigation Results

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing challenges. Linda Joyce St Vincent s Hospital Melbourne

BACTERIOLOGY PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM

New Opportunities for Microbiology Labs to Add Value to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Xochitl Morgan: The human microbiome; the role of commensals in health and disease.

New and Innovative Applications for Metals COPPER. Tony Lea International Copper Association

TECHNICAL BULLETIN PURELL Advanced with Aloe Instant Hand Sanitizer

IV Antibiotics for Lyme Disease (Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime sodium, Doxycycline, Penicillin G potassium)

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N. J.) All these cultures proved to be highly active against mycobacteria.

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

Liofilchem. ID-AST systems

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

KWIK-STIK & LYFO DISK

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SYMMETRY ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMING HANDWASH with 0.3% PCMX Technical Data

Mark Your Calendars Now! Next Event Ships: September 14, 2015

Lamilux AntiBac. Maximum hygiene thanks to steril surfaces

microbiology testing services

Robert Koch-Institut Centre for Biological Security 2

Natural Outbreaks and Bioterrorism: Giovanni Rezza Department of Infectious Diseases Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

Microbial Hazards in Dairy Industry Ceren Zeytinci

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

UNDERSTANDING THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Quality Milk. got milk? Milk Quality. Why Bacteria in Milk Matters. Bacteria in Milk. Milk.One of Mother Nature s Most Perfect Foods

20/02/2013. Blood Cultures How they work Key pathogens Interest and value. Blood cultures:

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

Disinfectants and Antiseptics Reference tests register

Objectives. Basic Microbiology. Patient related. Environment related. Organism related 10/12/2017

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS AND QASM PATIENTS

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

CERTIFICATION. Certificate No. The AOAC Research Institute hereby certifies that the performance of the test kit known as: Compact Dry X SA

Antimicrobial and toxicological profile of the new biocide Akacid plus Ò

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

CHALLENGE SET EXERCISE FALL 2008

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE MECHANISMS

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Infections in Arizona Companion Animal Species from January 2015 to December 2016

Outbreaks Due to Unpasteurized Dairy Products in the United States

M45: INFREQUENTLY ISOLATED OR FASTIDIOUS BACTERIA

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Exploring simvastatin, an antihyperlipidemic drug, as a potential topical antibacterial agent

Recent Topics of Brucellosis

SUMMARY OF TESTS BEING EXECUTED WITH OXILITE OR NEUTRAL OXILITE PRODUCED ON WPT WATER-MASTER EQUIPMENT.

Classification of Bacteria

The EFSA s BIOHAZ Panel perspective on food microbiology and hygiene

SAMPLE (DO NOT COPY)

INFECTION PREVENTION SILVER ANTI-MICROBIAL TEXTILES

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Block Objectives: Basic Infectious Diseases Block

CAVICIDE1. Technical Bulletin

Z oonotic Bacterial DEPARTMENT MICROBIOLOGY F K U S U

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods

AMR epidemiological situation: ECDC update

Health and Hygiene (Pty) Ltd. Reference Test Certificate Register for F10 Disinfectant Test description - testing body Test ref no.

This review is intended d to be a reference to describe the potential. Antimicrobial Efficacy

Infection control for neutropenic cancer patients : the use of prophylactic antibiotics. by author

PVA Sponge Products. Bacteriostatic PVA sponges

3/10/2016. Faster Microbiology An Outcome Analysis. Disclaimer. Short Topic Objectives

Food-borne Zoonoses. Stuart A. Slorach

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2011

Design of antimicrobial susceptibility testing programmes relevant to aquaculture and aquacultural products

GROUP 4: ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING FOR SELECETED SPECIES

Specificity of a Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay of a Target Sequence on the 31-Kilodalton Brucella Antigen DNA Used to Diagnose Human Brucellosis

Transcription:

Safety and Accuracy Assessment of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Platforms for the Detection of Biological Threats James T. Rudrik, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

Preparation Safety Study Determined viability of BT agents using direct, extended direct, and tube extraction Bacillus anthracis Sterne, Brucella abortus Strain 19, Francisella tularensis LVS, Yersinia pestis A1122, Burkholderia thailandensis ATCC 70038, Clostridium spp (botulinum types A, B, E, and perfringens) Some isolates of B. anthracis, C. botulinum, F. tularensis, Y. pestis, and B. abortus survived the direct and extended direct prep methods None survived the tube extraction B. anthracis, B. thuringiensis, B. cereus, B. subtilis survived tube extraction in other studies Use tube extraction AND 0.1 µm filter for hazardous organisms

Study Design Determine ability of Bruker and Vitek software libraries to accurately identify BT agents Test IVD, ROU, and Security Libraries independently Panel of 6 strains and 6 near neighbors for each agent B. anthracis, Y. pestis, F. tularensis (5), C. botulinum (4), B. mallei, B. pseudomallei, Brucella spp. Select isolates from AOAC Stakeholder Panel on Agent Detection Assays (SPADA) inclusivity and exclusivity panels Each isolate tested in triplicate Challenges No SPADA panels for C. botulinum or Brucella spp. Isolate availability and shipping No tube extraction procedure for Vitek MS

Study Limitations Samples were prepared by four labs, shipped and stored frozen Some participants tested extracts beyond the 45 day time frame established in the study protocol Some participants prepared new targets for testing each software library

Bruker Microflex Software libraries: IVD (version 1, n = 210), RUO (version 3, n = 2,500), Security (version 1, n = 12) Sample score of > 2.0 was considered accurate ID to genus and species Published studies validated samples scores between 1.7 and 1.9 for species level identification for some organisms

(# of strains B. anthracis (6) B. thuringiensis B. circulans B. cereus B. mycoides B. megaterium B. subtilis Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) No reliable ID 1.13 (90) 1.38 (45) 1.1 (40) B. cereus 1.88 (62) 8.3 B. anthracis 2.08 (68) 50 B. pseudomycoides 1.56 No reliable ID 1.1 (12) 1.33 (9) 1.12 (9) B. cereus 2.01 (9) 22.2 B. anthracis 2.06 (9) 38.9 No reliable ID 1.06 (12) 1.33 (5) 1.01 (18) B. circulans 1.87 (13) 16.7 No reliable ID 1.15 (12) 1.35 (9) 1.23 (9) B. cereus 2.08 (9) 44.4 B. anthracis 2.14 (9) 50 No reliable ID 1.15 (15) 1.61 (7) B. mycoides 1.77 (7) B. anthracis 1.77 (18) B. 1.19 (4) weihenstephanensis No reliable ID 1.12 (12) 1.35 (3) 1.06 (18) B. megaterium 1.98 (15) 55.6 No reliable ID 1.04 (15) 1.47 (13) 0.98 (18) B. subtilis 1.68 (5)

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) Y. pestis (6) Y. ruckeri Y. pseudotuberculosis (3) Y. enterocolitica (2) No reliable ID 1.47 (8) 1.5 (10) 1.46 (14) Y. pseudotuberculosis 2.15 (72) 73.8 2.2 (98) 81.5 Y. pestis 2.16 (94) 82.4 No reliable ID 1.67 (2) 1.68 (2) Y. ruckerii 1.88 (9) Y. pseudotuberculosis 1.75 (8) 1.82 (6) Y. pestis 1.82 (16) Y. enterocolitica 1.72 (2) 1.88 (3) No reliable ID 1.64 Y. pseudotuberculosis 2.04 (38) 76.9 2.15 (53) 86.8 Y. pestis 1.96 (53) 35.8 No reliable ID 1.64 (7) Y. enterocolitica 2.18 (17) 58.3 2.3 (36) 100 Y. pseudotuberculosis 2.14 (7) 29.1 Y. pestis 1.97 (29) 33.3

(# of strains F. tularensis (5) F. philomiragia (3) F. novicida (2) H. influenzae Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) No reliable ID 1.11 (60) 1.33 (87) 1.34 (46) ID % (>2.0) F. tularensis 1.77 (41) 4.6 No reliable ID 1.14 (39) 1.43 (14) 1.16 (54) F. philomiragia 1.94 (40) 22.2 No reliable ID 1.1 (24) 1.36 (36) 1.45 (29) F. tularensis 1.73 (6) No reliable ID 1.56 (5) 1.04 (18) H. influenzae 2.1 (10) 60 2.19 (18) 83.3

(# of strains B. mallei (6) B. thailandensis B. cepacia B. cenocepacia B. multivorans S. maltophilia Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) No reliable ID 1.27 (75) 1.56 (47) B. thailandensis 1.87 (58) 7.4 B. pseudomallei 2.16 (5) 3.7 B. mallei 2.17 (103) 71.3 B. vietnamiensis 1.33 (3) No reliable ID 1.36 (15) B. thailandensis 2.11 (18) 94.4 B. pseudomallei 1.96 (11) 22.2 B. mallei 1.99 (7) 16.6 No relaible ID 1.34 (18) B. cepacia complex 2.05 (15) 53.3 B. cepacia 2.17 (12) 66.6 B. cenocepacia 2.01 (2) 5.6 B. pyrrocina 2.07 (4) 11.1 No reliable ID 1.27 (18) B. cepacia complex 2.04 (15) 60 B. cenocepacia 2.24 (18) 100 No reliable ID 1.42 (18) B. multivorans 2.18 (15) 73.3 2.14 (18) 77.7 No reliable ID 0.95 (18) S. maltophilia 2.02 (15) 53.3 2.22 (18) 94.4

(# of strains B. pseudomallei (6) Reported Identification (# replicates) IVD Library RUO Library Security Library Species level ID % (>2.0) No reliable ID 1.27 (74) 1.54 (28) ID % (>2.0) B. thailandensis 1.84 (79) 5.6 ID % (>2.0) B. 2.1 (100) 78.5 pseudomallei B. mallei 2.06 (7) 6.5

(# of strains C. botulinum (4) C. perfringens C. difficile C. septicum C. sordellii C. innocuum C. butyricum Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library Species ID % (>2.0) level ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) No reliable ID 1.08 (51) 1.47 (26) 1.29 (51) C. sporogenes 1.86 (46) C. botulinum 1.84 (21) 15.3 No reliable ID 1.0 (3) 1.05 (18) C. perfringens 2.22 (12) 80 2.31 (18) 100 No reliable ID 0.97 (3) 1.04 (17) C. difficile 2.14 (12) 46.7 2.19 (17) 100 No reliable ID 1.12 (15) 1.06 (18) C. septicum 2.30 (18) 100 No reliable ID 1.07 (15) 1.09 (18) C. sordellii 2.12 (18) 83.3 No reliable ID 1.18 (15) 1.55 (2) 1.06 (18) C. innocuum 2.20 (16) 83.3 No reliable ID 1.10 (15) 1.36 (3) 0.98 (18) C. butyricum 2.32 (15) 77.8

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Security Library ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) ID % (>2.0) B. melitensis (2) B. abortus (2) B. suis B. canis B. neotomae B. ovis O. anthropi B. pinnipedialis B. ceti O. ureolytica No reliable ID 1.04 (18) 1.3 (36) 1.6 (2) B. melitensis 2.17 (34) 83.3 No reliable ID 1.03 (23) 1.31 (35) B. melitensis 2.17 (35) 82.9 No reliable ID 1.04 (12) 1.27 (18) 0 B. melitensis 2.17 (17) 94.4 No reliable ID 0.75 (12) 1.21 (18) 1.63 (9) B. melitensis 2.05 (9) 44.4 No reliable ID 1.16 (15) 1.3 (18) B. melitensis 1.96 (18) 22.2 No reliable ID 1.06 (15) 1.32 (18) 1.36 B. melitensis 1.88 (17) 11.1 No reliable ID 1.04 (15) 1.69 1.15 (18) Ochrobactrum spp. 1.96 (13) O. intermedium 1.82 No reliable ID 1.13 (15) 1.43 (15) 1.63 (3) B. melitensis 1.81 (15) Ochrobactrum tritici 1.77 (3) No reliable ID 1.1 (13) 1.34 (18) B. melitensis 1.98 (18) 38.9 No reliable ID 1.27 (2) 1.66 1.05 (18) O. ureolytica 1.88 (13) 20 1.86 (17) 22.2

Vitek MS Vitek MS (biomerieux Inc., Durham, NC) equipped with the IVD (version 2.0, n = 193) and RUO (version 4.12, n = 1,388) software libraries Identification score of >60% was considered accurate ID to genus and species

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library B. anthracis (6) B. thuringiensis B. circulans B. cereus No Identification 0 (12) 0 (19) B. thuringiensis/b. cereus/b. mycoides 33.3/33.3/33.3 (36) B. cereus group 94.9 (35) No Identification 0 B. mycoides/b. cereus/b. thuringiensis 33.3/33.3/33.3 (9) B. cereus group 81.6 (8) No Identification 0 (7) 0 (7) B. circulans 45 (2) Serratia rubideae/mycobacterium 25/25 smegmatis E. coli 99.9 11.1 No Identification 0 (3) 0 (3) B. mycoides/b. cereus/b. thuringiensis 33.3/33.3/33.3 (6) B. cereus group 95.3 (5) Capnocytophaga ochacea/sputigena 78.4

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library B. mycoides B. megaterium B. subtilis No Identification 0 (3) 0 B. mycoides/b. cereus/b. thuringiensis 33.3/33.3/33.3 (6) B. cereus group 91.5 (3) B. weihenstephanensis 84.7 (5) 55.6 No Identification 0 (2) B. megaterium 94.8 (9) 100 84.2 (3) 33.3 B. megaterium/b. coagulans/b.amyloliquefaciens 82.4 (3) B. coagulans/b. megaterium 76.6 No Identification 0 (6) B. amyloliquefaciens/b. subtilis 50/50 (9) B. subtilis 82 (3) 33.3

(# of isolates Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library Y. pestis (6) Y. ruckeri Y. pseudotuberculosis (3) Y. enterocolitica (2) No Identification 0 (2) 0 (23) Y. pseudotuberculosis/y. frederiksenii 51.7/48.2 (7) Y. ruckerii/y. pseudotuberculosis/y. 33.3/33.4/33.2 frederiksenii Y. pseudotuberculosis 99.9 (17) 58.6 87.8 (18) 33.3 Y. pestis 99.9 3.4 Yersinia spp. 88.8 (13) No Identification 0 (5) Y. ruckerii 99.7 (4) 44.4 Yersinia spp. 85.7 (9) No ID 0 Y. pseudotuberculosis 99.6 (20) 95.2 91.9 (20) 95.2 Y. enterocolitica 94.1 4.8 No Identification 0 Y. enterocolitica 99.9 (8) 66.7 97.5 (11) 91.7 Y. pseudotuberculosis 86 Y. pseudotuberculosis/y. enterocolitica 49.1/50.9 (3)

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library F. tularensis (5) No ID 0 (33) 0 (31) F. tularensis 77.5 (14) 24.4 Enterobacter cloacae/e. asburiae 50/50 Streptococcus constellatus 68.3 2.2 Streptococcus pluranimalium 64.5 (3) 4.4 Vibrio mimicus 33.6 Kocuria varians/gemella bergeri 33.3/33.4 Cellulosmicrobium cellulans/s. equi ssp equi 46.2/53.7 F. philomiragia (3) F. novicida (2) H. influenzae Acinetobacter johnsonii 79.8 (2) 4.4 Kytococcus sedentarius 96.1 2.2 No Identification 0 (27) 0 (25) Microsporum canis 76.5 3.7 Enterococcus spp. 81.2 3.7 No ID 0 (16) 0 (8) F. tularensis 92.2 (10) 55.6 Erwinia rhapontici 75.1 5.6 Vibrio alginolyticus 81.2 5.6 No Identification 0 (4) 0 (6) H. influenzae 99.9 (4) 44.4 93.5 (3) 33.3 H. influenzae/h. haemolyticus/s. mitis/s. oralis 33/33/33

(# of isolates B. mallei (6) B. thailandensis B. cepacia B. cenocepacia Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library No Identification 0 (51) 0 (31) B. multivorans 99.4 1.9 Burkholderia spp. 77.8 (6) Streptococcus porcinus 95.3 (2) 3.7 Staphylococcus carnosus 75.2 1.9 Escherichia coli 79.3 1.9 Yersinia spp. 77.8 No Identification 0 (9) 0 (5) Burkholderia spp. 75.9 (3) Staphylococcus epidermidis 75 No Identification 0 (4) 0 B. cepacia 99.4 (2) 28.6 83 11.1 Burkholderia spp. 85 (7) B. cepacia/b. vietnamensis 50/50 No Identification 0 (3) 0 (5) B. cepacia 99.8 (5) 55.6 Burkholderia spp. 88.2 (4) B. cepacia/b. vietnamensis 50.0/49.9

(# of isolates Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library B. pseudomallei (6) B. multivorans S. maltophilia No Identification 0 (54) 0 (47) Burkholderia spp. 76.2 (2) Staphylococcus aureus 77.3 1.9 Streptococcus oralis 86 1.9 E. coli 86.5 1.9 Yersinia spp. 75 No Identification 0 (3) 0 (4) B. multivorans 88.8 (6) 55.6 87.6 (3) 33.3 Burkholderia spp. 87.1 (2) No Identification 0 (2) 0 (3) S. maltophilia 99.9 (7) 77.8 93 (6) 66.7

(# of strains Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library C. botulinum No Identification 0 (9) 0 (35) (4) Clostridium sporogenes 99.5 (24) 66.7 Mycobacterium bovis/m. tuberculosis/c. sporogenes 33/33/33 (3) Candida krusei 79 2.8 C. perfringens C. perfringens 99.9 (9) 100 99.3 (9) 100 C. difficile No Identification 0 (3) 0 C. difficile 96.5 (6) 66.7 97.4 (8) 88.9 C. septicum C. sordellii C. innocuum No Identification 0 C. septicum 99.9 (9) 100 86.2 (8) 88.9 No Identification 0 (9) C. sordellii 92.6 (8) 88.9 C. sordellii/l. monocytogenes 58.6/41.4 No Identification 0 (8) 0 (7) Citrobacter freundii 78.1 11.1 Candida norvegensis 78 11.1 Staphylococcus aureus 94.8 11.1 C. butyricum C. butyricum 99.9 (6) 100 99.1 (9) 100

(# of isolates Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library B. melitensis (2) B. abortus (2) B. suis B. canis No ID 0 (16) 0 (7) Brucella spp. 90.2 (11) Enterococcus avium 35.6 Prevotella disiens 99.9 5.6 No ID 0 (15) 0 (9) Brucella spp. 83.5 (9) Listeria seeligeri 50.1 Alloiococcus otitis 51.4 Actinomyces radingae/l. seeligeri 56.4/43.5 No identification 0 (6) Brucella spp. 89.9 (6) No Identification 0 (8) 0 (5) Brucella spp. 89.2 (3) Gordonia rubripertincta/ralstonia 21.4/21.4/21.4 mannitolilytica/ L. seeligeri Candida glabrata 90.2 11.1

(# of isolates Reported Identification IVD Library RUO Library B. neotomae B. ovis O. anthropi B. pinnipedialis B. ceti O. ureolytica No Identification 0 (9) Brucella spp. 89.6 (9) No Identification 0 (9) 0 (3) Brucella spp. 84 (6) No Identification 0 (5) 0 O. anthropi 99.9 (4) 44.4 85.3 (3) 33.3 Ochrobactrum spp. 88.8 (5) No Identification 0 (5) Brucella spp. 89.6 (6) E. asburiae/o. anthropi/e. cloacae/v. 25/25/25/25 parahaemolyticus O. anthropi 99.9 (3) 33.3 81.6 11.1 Ochrobactrum spp. 81 (2) No Identification 0 (9) 0 Brucella spp. 87.8 (7) No Identification 0 (3) 0 (4) O. ureolytica 99.9 (5) 55.6 81.7 (3) 33.3 Oligella spp. 78.9 (2) L. seeligeri/o. ureolytica 43.2/56.7

Identification Errors Organism Concerns B. anthracis B. cereus B. cereus group Split identifications B. thuringiensis B. anthracis B. cereus B. anthracis Y. pestis Y. pseudotuberculosis Yersinia spp. Split identifications Y. pseudotuberculosis Y. pestis Y. enterocolitica Y. pestis F. philomiragia F. tularensis Organism Concerns B. mallei B. pseudomallei B. pseudomallei B. mallei B. thailandensis B. pseudomallei B. mallei C. botulinum C. sporogenes B. melitensis Brucella spp. B. abortus, suis, canis, ovis, ceti pinnipedialsis B. melitensis Brucella spp.

Conclusions Software libraries for BT agents need improvement Addition of BT agents to IVD software Availability of alternative libraries i.e. MicrobeNet Laboratories must be aware of software limitations Partial or incorrect identifications Additional training by manufacturer or BT coordinator MALDI-TOF currently not reliable for ID of BT agents Critical thinking about ID does the result make sense Continue use of rule out and refer protocols

Study Participants Michigan Department of Health and Human Services New York Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Biodefense Laboratory North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Public Health Laboratories Jacksonville Branch Minnesota Department of Health State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa Texas Department of State Health Services, Laboratory Services Section, Austin Center for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University