AnimalShelterStatistics

Similar documents
AnimalShelterStatistics

2017 ANIMAL SHELTER STATISTICS

AnimalShelterStatistics

Cats in Canada A five year review of overpopulation

Port Alberni & the BC SPCA: Help us continue our Successful Pet Overpopulation Strategy

Presentation on the Benefits of a TNR (Trap, Neuter, Return) Program. for the Management of Free-roaming Cats

Mission. a compassionate community where animals and people are cared for and valued. Private nonprofit

Offering a Humane Solution to Feline Overpopulation LOCATED IN HAMILTON, MONTANA

Abbotsford & the BC SPCA: Community Update

Position Statements. Purpose

Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council. Original Signed. Trap Neuter and Release (TNR) Program Funding Request

Building Responsible Pet Ownership Communities The Calgary Model. Thursday, October 22, 15

Canadian Standards of Care in Animal Shelters: Supporting ASV Guidelines

PROJECT CATSNIP IN PALM BEACH COUNTY COUNTDOWN 2 ZERO

6. SPAY/NEUTER: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR PET CARETAKERS LIVING IN POVERTY-- WE CAN T GET TO ZERO WITHOUT THEM

TORONTO S FERAL CATS TODAY. TorontoFeralCatCoalition.ca

ANTIOCH ANIMAL SERVICES

Total Funding Requested: $25, Pasco County Board of County Commissioners

GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY ANIMAL CENSUS REPORT January 2018

What's Happening to Cats at HAS?

2014 Canadian Animal Protection Laws Rankings

Grant ID: 220. Application Information. Demographics.

Fast Tracking to Save Lives: Simple to Systematic ASPCA. All Rights Reserved.

Chapter One. Know Yourself Status Check

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

SPAY / NEUTER: IT S NOT JUST ABOUT KITTENS AND PUPPIES

Intake Policies That Save Lives

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Animal Care Expo Return to Field. Bryan Kortis

Community Cats and the Ecosystem

AN ENLIGHTENED APPROACH TO COMPANION ANIMAL CONTROL FOR CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF CATS ON BIRDS AND WILDLIFE: RECOMMENDED POLICIES AND BYLAWS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

Community Cat Programs Handbook. CCP Operations: Working Toward Positive Outcomes

Total Funding Requested: $25, Putnam County Board of County Commissioners.

KERN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER EVALUATION OF ANIMAL CARE AND POPULATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS UC Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program

ANNUAL REPORT

Authority to Reduce Adoption, Sheltering, Surrender and Impoundment Fees for Dogs and Cats

Thomas J. O Connor Animal Control & Adoption Center: Spay or Pay

Best Friends No More Homeless Pets, Presenter Ruth Steinberger, director Spay FIRST!

Drop box located at the SPCA of Wake County, NC. Drop cage located at the animal control facility in Dunn, North Carolina

Friends of Animals of Jackson County

TITLE 61 LEGISLATIVE RULE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SERIES 24 WEST VIRGINIA SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Message from the NWT SPCA President,

Spay/Neuter. Featured Resource. Resources Like This: Animal transport guidelines Read more about this resource»

Placer SPCA open admission shelter Annual total intake = ~4000 Annual cat intake = ~2400 For 2012: Total cat intake = 2411, adoptions = 1558 Average

General Manager, Development, Building and Licensing

Medically Unnecessary Veterinary Surgery ( Cosmetic Surgery )

The No Kill Equation

DEPARTMENT: Domestic Animal Services EXTERNAL FEE NUMBER: EX 1-1* DATE APPROVED: ; ; ; ; ; ;

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BUTTE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT BUTTE COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL AND SHELTERS

Success for Cats with Capacity for Care

CREATING A NO-KILL COMMUNITY IN BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA. Report to Maddie s Fund August 15, 2008

Truly Targeted Spay/Neuter

TESTIMONY TO THE NYS ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE. SFY STATE BUDGET and LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Identifying Best Practice Domestic Cat Management in Australia

Responsible Pet Ownership Program Working Group Summary of Recommendations

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SPCA) OF NORTH BREVARD May 26, 2009 POSITION STATEMENT

Pet Industry Association of Australia

Free-roaming community cats

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

MLA Research Paper (Berger)

LEGISLATION: COMMUNITY-WIDE SOLUTIONS FOR A COMMUNITY-WIDE PROBLEM

IT S ALL ABOUT THE ANIMALS

Community Report. Community Report. Proudly supporting the following community initiatives

Oakland Police Department. Bureau of Services. Animal Services

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council January 24, 2017

November 4, Board of Directors Peace River Regional District Box 810 Dawson Creek, BC V1G 4H8

Person Submitting Proposal: Glenda Sparnroft Position: President/Founder Person Submitting Proposal Address: Agency Head:


The purpose of this standard operating procedure is to outline the policy and procedures for the intake of animals.

Photo courtesy of PetSmart Charities, Inc., and Sherrie Buzby Photography. Community Cat Programs Handbook. CCP Operations: Intake of Cats and Kittens

Target Your Spay/Neuter Efforts

A New Approach to Saving Cats?

We will spay or neuter community (free roaming) cats at no cost to citizens of Greenville County.

No Frill No Kill: A New Approach to Saving Cats?

Volunteer Services for Animals, Inc.

September 10, 2013 WORK SESSION AGENDA. 1:00 5:00 p.m. Time Certain

Higher National Unit specification: general information. Veterinary Nursing: Companion Animal Health and Welfare

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Santa Barbara County Animal Care Foundation Creative Brief Comm 166. Rachel Johnsen

hope for our animals. hope for our community.

Winnebago County Animal Services

Spay & Neuter Overview

Animal Control Budget Unit 2760

City of Burleson, Texas

PURR-fecting the Impact of TNR: Creating a community cat program that works. Bethany Heins City of San Antonio Animal Care Services

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

City of Burleson, Texas


Virtual Shelter Project You Can Save Your Pet s Life Without A Shelter.

Richmond Animal League, Inc.

Building Rewarding & Lasting Partnerships. Business Overview

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Department of Code Compliance

Best Practice Strategies

Transcription:

AnimalShelterStatistics 2012 This report published on December 18, 2013

INTRODUCTION Humane societies and Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCAs) are a pillar of the animal welfare movement in Canada. The Canadian SPCA, the first in the country, was formed in Montreal in 1869 to provide for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the dominion. The next three decades saw the formation of the Ontario SPCA (known then as the Ontario Humane Society), the Nova Scotia Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Toronto Humane Society, and the British Columbia SPCA. Today there are 186 humane societies and SPCAs located across the country (Table 1). In their early years, humane societies and SPCAs were charged with protecting, not only animals, but also children and women. Their mandate included investigating cruelty complaints, education about and promotion of humane treatment, as well as proposing and enforcing legislation for the protection of animals. The focus of these societies was often the welfare of workhorses, who were common victims of cruelty and neglect, along with farm animals, such as cattle and cocks used for fighting. Gradually their purview extended to companion animals and wildlife. With time these charitable organizations took on the role of sheltering and providing direct care for stray and unwanted companion animals, returning stray animals to their guardians, and finding homes for those in need. In recent years, societies have also implemented programs to provide veterinary services and support for animal care in the community at large. Through their role in ending animal cruelty, advancing animal protection, and promoting the humane treatment of animals, humane societies and SPCAs play a vital role in building a humane Canada. This report presents the results of the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS) survey of humane societies and SPCAs for the year 2012, which demonstrate the scale of cats and dogs being taken in to shelters across Canada as well as their fate. A comparison of the 2012 figures to those from shelter surveys conducted by the CFHS in previous years suggests slowly improving trends in the homeless companion animal population in Canada. Individual shelters and communities collect and analyze data about the animals under their care to fulfill essential functions, such as evaluating the effectiveness of their programs (for example, those targeting increased adoption or spay/neuter), prioritizing program resource allocation, and for accountability. The aggregation of this shelter data at a national level is critical to provide indicators of companion animal welfare and responsible guardianship in Canadian society. National data also affords indicators of the scale of work being undertaken by Canadian shelters as an industry. Finally, it permits individual organizations to benchmark themselves against national averages. 1

THE DATA SET The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS), the only national organization representing humane societies and SPCAs in Canada, has been collecting statistics from animal shelters since 1993. To collect the 2012 data, the CFHS conducted an online survey between April and August 2013. Requests were sent to the 186 Canadian humane societies and SPCAs to complete the survey, and 113 societies responded. Of the responses, 100 were complete and 2 others included data regarding the intake of animals only. The remaining 11 responses were not complete enough to include in the analysis. This corresponds to a response rate of 55%. Of the 102 responding organizations, 59 are members of the CFHS (Figure 1). The CFHS included intake data from the 2 partial responses but used only the 100 complete responses when calculating percentage outcomes relative to intake. Table 1: Humane societies and SPCAs in Canada by province or territory Province or Territory Number of humane societies and SPCAs Alberta 20 British Columbia 41 Manitoba 6 New Brunswick 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 8 Northwest Territories 3 Nova Scotia 10 43 59 84 Nunavut 1 Ontario 53 Prince Edward Island 1 Quebec 17 Saskatchewan 14 Yukon 2 Total 186 CFHS member responses Non-member responses Did not respond Figure 1. Responses to the CFHS 2012 shelter survey from 186 humane societies and SPCAs in Canada Throughout this report the term shelter is used as a short form to refer to humane societies and SPCAs. While the term more generally encompasses other establishments that also shelter homeless animals, such as individual private shelters, rescue and foster groups, and municipal animal services, these establishments were not targeted by the CFHS survey. Therefore, the data in this report represents only a fraction of homeless companion animals in Canada. Who is the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies? The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS) is the only national organization representing humane societies and SPCAs in Canada. Founded in 1957, the CFHS works toward positive, progressive change to end animal cruelty, improve animal protection, and promote the humane treatment of all animals. As the convener and representative of the largest animal welfare community in Canada, the CFHS advances the welfare of companion animals, farm animals, wildlife, and animals in research with a strong national voice promoting the interests and concerns of animal welfare to government, policy makers, industry, and the public. 2

INTAKE Intake represents the total number of cats and dogs received by the shelters who responded to the 2012 survey. Shelters in Canada took in over 119,000 cats and over 53,000 dogs in 2012 (Appendix, Figure 2). These values are similar to and slightly lower than those reported for 2011 (CFHS, 2012). Total intake levels were higher in 2011 and 2012 relative to recent previous years. The intake of cats has consistently been greater than dogs: shelter surveys conducted by the CFHS indicate that since 2001 Canadian shelters have taken in approximately twice as many cats in a given year as dogs. 1.7% 1.3% 3.3% 24% 60% 8.5% 28% 63% 0.8% 2.9% Born in shelter Seized (cases of abuse) Transferred from another organization Surrendered by owner Stray/surrended by member of public Dog Intake Cat Intake 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 Cats Dogs Figure 3. Sources of intake of cats and dogs in 2012 Figure 3 presents the sources of cats and dogs brought to Canadian shelters in 2012. The majority of animals were taken in as stray (60% of cat intake and 63% of dog intake). Animals surrendered by their guardians make up the second largest category (24% of cat intake and 28% of dog intake). Although twice as many cats entered shelters as dogs, it is important to note the similar proportions of the intake categories. Figure 2. Total intake of cats and dogs to shelters The increase in animal intake since 2008, as shown in Figure 2, may be related to the economic recession in Canada. Food bank use, unemployment, and poverty in Canada all increased in 2008 and have not declined to previous levels (Food Banks Canada, 2013). An increasing number of Canadians in financially unstable circumstances may not have had the means to care for their companion animals and as a result relinquished or abandoned them. Alternatively, fewer Canadians may have spent resources to have their animals sterilized, resulting in higher intake of puppies, kittens, and their mothers. Future surveys will request animals taken in be categorized by age (juvenile versus adult), which will help to address the latter possibility. 3

OUTCOMES Figure 4 presents the outcomes of cats and dogs from responding shelters in 2012 as a percentage of total shelter population. Figures 5 to 7 show the specific outcomes as rates relative to total intake and provide comparisons to previous data collected since 2007. Finally, the Appendix lists the absolute numbers of animals by category. 3.7% 1.0% 0.8% 3.3% 42% 41% 8.3% Cats 26% 45% 4.3% 15% 6.2% Dogs 0.3% 2.5% Reclaimed Adopted Transferred Euthanized Died or lost Other outcome Remained in shelter Figure 4. 0utcomes of animals in 2012 relative to total shelter population Reclaim by Guardian More than a quarter of dogs taken in by shelters are reclaimed by their guardians, a significantly higher fraction than for cats (Figure 4). Figure 5 shows that this difference in reclaim rates for cats and dogs has been fairly consistent since 2007. Generally, 25 to 30% of dogs are reclaimed by their guardians compared to less than 5% of cats. Comparing the number of animals reclaimed to the number of stray animals taken in to shelters provides a gauge of the number of lost animals that are returned to their guardians. In 2012 the reclaim to stray rate was only 7% for cats and 45% for dogs. One approach to improving reclaim rates may be to provide permanent identification prior to adoption. Of the organizations surveyed in 2012, 17% do not have a policy of microchipping prior to adoption. Some organizations indicated they only microchip dogs, not cats. If widespread, the practice of offering permanent identification preferentially for dogs over cats could in part explain the difference in the reclaim rates. Other explanations for this difference are that a subset of cats could be mischaracterized as stray when they actually have no guardians; the rate of abandonment (in the street) could be higher for cats than dogs; and the value of cats could generally be lower than that of dogs, such that less effort is made to find stray cats compared to stray dogs. Adoption In 2012 adoption rates were very similar for cats and dogs at 42% and 45%, respectively (Figure 4). Adoption rates of dogs appear to have decreased slightly in 2011 and 2012 relative to previous years, while cat adoption rates have increased since 2010 (Figure 6). Figure 6 does not include data going back to 1993 because the number of respondents in these earlier surveys is not currently known. However, the percentage of cats and dogs adopted from 1993 to 2000 was consistently less than 35% and less than 40%, respectively, suggesting an improvement in adoption rates relative to the 1990s. Nevertheless, adoptions have typically made up less than 50% of the possible outcomes. Dogs Adopted (%) Cats Adopted (%) Dogs Reclaimed (%) Cats Reclaimed (%) 60 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 Figure 5. Percentage of cats and dogs reclaimed relative to total intake 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 Figure 6. Percentage of cats and dogs adopted relative to total intake 4

OUTCOMES Euthanasia Euthanasia numbers for cats and dogs differed markedly in 2012. Six times as many cats were euthanized as dogs (Appendix). This corresponds to 41% of cats in shelters euthanized compared to 15% of dogs (Figure 4). The 2012 euthanasia rates are similar to those in 2011 and in general appear to be decreasing relative to 2007 and 2008 (Figure 7). Figure 7 does not include data from surveys going back to 1993 as the number of respondents in these earlier surveys is not currently known. However, the earlier data suggests an overall decreasing trend in euthanasia rates from 60% and 30% for cats and dogs, respectively, through the mid-1990s. Unfortunately, the euthanasia rates for cats have been consistently twice as high as those for dogs over the last 20 years. This dire situation reflects the cat overpopulation crisis in Canada, which is described extensively in CFHS s Cats in Canada report (CFHS, 2012). 60 50 40 Dogs Euthanized (%) Cats Euthanized (%) Year Cats Dogs 2008 9% 6% 2010 8% 3% 2012 3% 1% Table 2. Percentage of healthy cats and dogs euthanized relative to total intake Remaining in Shelter Figure 4 includes the percentage of incoming cats and dogs that remained in the shelter, which corresponds to 3.3% and 2.5%, respectively. The welfare and healthy socialization of animals that remain in shelter for long periods of time may be compromised. Therefore, this category could anticipate a less satisfactory outcome. Technically, the category Remained in shelter includes animals in foster care that are still under the responsibility of a shelter; conditions for animals in foster care might be healthier or less stressful than in busy shelters. 30 20 10 0 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 Figure 7. Percentage of cats and dogs euthanized relative to total intake The number of healthy cats euthanized has been higher than the number of healthy dogs euthanized since 2008, when the CFHS first reported results of that survey category. While a decreasing percentage of healthy animals euthanized for both cats and dogs is a positive trend (Table 2), it is important to note one caveat. Animals in shelters often become ill due to stress and crowded conditions; therefore, a decrease in the number of healthy animals euthanized could also mean that fewer animals remain healthy during their stay in a shelter. 5

SPAY/NEUTER In 2012 96% of responding shelters spay or neuter animals in their care before adoption as a matter of policy. This percentage is much improved relative to 62% of shelters that responded to the 2010 shelter survey. Over 22,000 cats and over 10,000 dogs were spayed or neutered while at shelters in 2012. The spay/neuter status of animals that are taken in to shelters is an interesting indicator of the level of sterilization of companion animals nationally. In 2012 only 11% of cats and 12% of dogs that were surrendered by their guardians were already sterilized, and just 4% of cats and 5% of dogs taken in as strays were already sterilized. The high proportion of intact animals that were surrendered or taken in as stray could be interpreted in a number of ways. These categories could represent populations of animals whose guardians are less informed about responsible pet guardianship or who value their animals less and, as a result, did not invest in spay/neuter surgery. Alternatively, being intact may have resulted in behaviours leading to the animal roaming or being abandoned. In all cases, more widespread education and accessible spay/neuter initiatives are needed. 6

CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS The data in the 2012 shelter survey was collected from humane societies and SPCAs and thus represents only a fraction of establishments that shelter animals in Canada. Nevertheless, this data set represents the best information about companion animals in Canadian shelters the CFHS is aware of. Based on responses received from 102 humane societies and SPCAs, the situation in shelters in Canada may be on a gradually improving trend. Unfortunately, the situation of cats in shelters in Canada is far worse than that of dogs. More than twice as many cats enter shelters than dogs, and though adoption rates for cats are similar to those for dogs, fewer cats are reclaimed and many more are euthanized. This situation is reflective of the feline overpopulation crisis addressed comprehensively in CFHS s Cats in Canada report (CFHS, 2012). The report outlines an extensive list of recommendations for different stakeholders to address this grave problem. Almost all of the responding organizations sterilize animals prior to adoption. Although this is good news, many animals coming in to shelters are not already spayed or neutered and may be contributing to companion animal overpopulation. The CFHS recommends that all shelters, SPCAs, humane societies, and rescue organizations incorporate a mandatory spay/neuter program as part of their companion animal adoption procedures. Furthermore, widespread education and accessible spay/neuter initiatives must be implemented across the country, targeting specific segments of communities that are the source of unsterilized animals to address their particular barriers, such as cost and geographic factors. There is significant room for improvement with regard to shelters policies to provide permanent identification before adoption. The CFHS encourages shelters to offer permanent identification, such as microchipping, as a method of improving the number of stray animals that are returned to their guardians. If shelters only provide permanent identification for dogs prior to adoption, the CFHS recommends this policy be extended to cats. Finally, the CFHS strongly encourages more organizations to collect data regarding the animals under their care and to share this data by participating in CFHS national shelter surveys. With only 55% of the 186 humane societies and SPCAs in Canada responding to the survey, the picture of homeless companion animals situation in Canada is incomplete. An accurate and relevant national picture of companion animal welfare and of the value of humane societies and SPCAs in safeguarding it requires extensive participation of the sheltering community. The heartrending crisis of companion animal overpopulation will never be solved without recognition that it is a communitywide problem whose solution entails open communication on the basis of solid evidence. References Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (2012). Cats in Canada: A comprehensive report on the cat overpopulation crisis. Retrieved from http://cfhs.ca/athome/cat_overpopulation_crisis/ Food Banks Canada (2013). HungerCount 2013: A comprehensive report on hunger and food bank use in Canada, and recommendations for change. Retrieved from http://www.foodbankscanada.ca/ Considerations for Future Surveys The CFHS will be providing more detailed guidance for future shelter surveys on the different categories of information collected so as to improve the consistency of data. For example, adoptions returned within 30 days should not be considered new intake, owner-requested euthanasia will be tracked separately, and transfers will be defined. Starting with next year s survey the CFHS will request shelters to provide the information in the US National Federation of Humane Society s Basic Animal Statistics Matrix (www.humanefederation.org/datametricsintro. cfm), recently adopted by the Shelter Animals Count US national database project, as a minimum data set. Additional survey questions will address the shelter s budget and resources, broader services offered by the shelter, and the population or the region served by the shelter. In this way, the shelter survey will be able to provide a clearer picture of the role of humane societies and SPCAs as an industry in addressing companion animal welfare in Canada. For further information and comments about the CFHS shelter survey, please contact info@cfhs.ca. 7

APPENDIX Aggregate total number of animals reported by survey respondents CATS DOGS CATS AND DOGS OTHER SPECIES TOTAL Beginning Count 10,398 3,907 14,305 1,067 15,308 2012 Intake Stray/Public-surrender 71,233 33,542 104,775 8,136 120,475 Owner-surrender 28,096 14,944 43,040 3,476 49,311 Cases of Abuse 1,522 1,550 3,072 305 3,375 Transfers 3,898 4,506 8,404 464 8,962 Born 1,997 439 2,436 207 2,789 Total 119,198 53,085 172,283 15,779 188,049 Outcomes - Live Releases Adopted 54,270 25,379 79,649 5,727 85,336 Reclaimed 4,823 14,879 19,702 253 19,769 Transfers 1,629 2,402 4,031 1,878 5,919 Outcomes - Euthanasia Healthy 1,815 107 1,922 27 1,949 Unhealthy and Untreatable 13,774 3,865 17,639 2,614 20,264 Owner Requested 3,451 2,212 5,663 236 5,899 Total 52,547 8,741 61,288 4,124 65,423 Outcomes - Other Died or Lost in Shelter 1,077 185 1,262 323 1,585 End count 6,060 2,486 8,546 615 10,276 Spay/Neuter Number of animals spayed/neutered while at the shelter 22,233 10,701 32,934 403 41,717 2013 8