Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Ross Beier 1, T. Poole 1, Dayna Harhay 2, and Robin Anderson 1 1

Similar documents
Project Summary. Impact of Feeding Neomycin on the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli O157:H7 and Commensal Organisms

The effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment on antibiotic resistant Salmonella populations in feedlot cattle

CRISPR Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella Isolates from Dairy Farm Environments in Texas

Antimicrobial Resistance: Do we know everything? Dr. Sid Thakur Assistant Professor Swine Health & Production CVM, NCSU

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) Salmonella in the U.S. Red Meat Supply: Prevalence, Source, Significance, and Control

Characterization of isolates from a multi-drug resistant outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia. coli O145 infections in the United States

Prevalence, quantity and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica in response to antibiotic use early in the cattle feeding period

Project Summary. Emerging Pathogens in US Cattle

Antibiotic resistance and the human-animal interface: Public health concerns

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

Urban Water Security Research Alliance

Performance Information. Vet use only

Objectives. Antibiotics uses in food animals 3/25/2018. California Dairy Productions. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Animal Production Environment

University Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Faculty of veterinary medicine-skopje

Animal Antibiotic Use and Public Health

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Overview of NARMS Program and Detecting Emerging/Novel Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Using WGS

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

CambodiaCase Study. An integrated surveillance study of AMR in Salmonella subspp, Campylobacter spp, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp in poultry

Please distribute a copy of this information to each provider in your organization.

The epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance and the link between human and veterinary medicine

Molecular Epidemiology of Enteric infections in Eastern Africa

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Twenty Years of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Where Are We And What Is Next?

Trends en voorkomen van resistenties bij Salmonella, Campylobacter en E. coli geïsoleerd uit de voeding

Palpasa Kansakar, Geeta Shakya, Nisha Rijal, Basudha Shrestha

Background and Plan of Analysis

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN KENYA; What Surveillance tells us

Antimicrobial Resistance Food Animal Antibiotic Use

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Trend Analysis

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN COMMENSAL E. COLI FROM LIVESTOCK IN BELGIUM: Veterinary Epidemiology

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

Co-transfer of bla NDM-5 and mcr-1 by an IncX3 X4 hybrid plasmid in Escherichia coli 4

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

USE OF GERMICIDES IN HOME AND HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GERMICIDE USE AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE

Salmonella Heidelberg: An Emerging Problem in the Dairy Industry

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Antimicrobial Drug Resistance of Salmonella and Escherichia coli Isolates from Cattle Feces, Hides, and Carcasses

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

ESCHERICHIA COLI RESISTANCE AND GUT MICROBIOTA PROFILE IN PIGS RAISED WITH DIFFERENT ANTIMICROBIAL ADMINISTRATION IN FEED

Aabo, Søren; Ricci, Antonia; Denis, Martine; Bengtsson, Björn; Dalsgaard, Anders; Rychlik, Ivan; Jensen, Annette Nygaard

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

The 5th CRL Profiency Testing Salmonella and Campylobacter 2008

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella Typhi From Kigali,

Antibiotic Symposium National Institute of Animal Agriculture Atlanta, Georgia

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

The Microbiome of Food Animals and the Effects of Antimicrobial Drugs

Do clinical microbiology laboratory data distort the picture of antibiotic resistance in humans and domestic animals?

Proceedings of the 19th American Academy of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Biennial Symposium

Origins of Resistance and Resistance Transfer: Food-Producing Animals.

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Is biocide resistance already a clinical problem?

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Pipestone Veterinary Services

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Antibiotic resistance of bacteria along the food chain: A global challenge for food safety

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Controlling Salmonella in Meat and Poultry Products

Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistance and Preparation of an Enhanced Antibiogram at the Local Level. janet hindler

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio cholerae Causing Diarrohea Outbreaks in Bidar, North Karnataka, India

A retrospective analysis of urine culture results issued by the microbiology department, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya

Antibiotic Resistance The Global Perspective

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky from poultry and poultry sources in Nigeria

Effect of heifer-raising practices on E. coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

Changing Practices to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance

Antimicrobial use in poultry: Emerging public health problem

SURVIVABILITY OF HIGH RISK, MULTIRESISTANT BACTERIA ON COTTON TREATED WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage

Walid Alali Assistant Professor, Food Safety Epidemiology

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

AMR Industry Alliance Antibiotic Discharge Targets

Human health impacts of antibiotic use in animal agriculture

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

CHINA: Progress report on the aquaculture component of country NAPs on AMR

Preliminary investigation of antibiotic resistant and susceptible Campylobacter in retail ground beef in the United States.

SMART WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS Introducing DxM MicroScan WalkAway System* ...

Transcription:

Project Summary Antibiotic and Disinfectant Susceptibility Profiles of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Cattle Feces, Hide, Carcass, and Ground Meat Isolates from the United States Principal Investigators: Ross Beier 1, T. Poole 1, Dayna Harhay 2, and Robin Anderson 1 1 USDA ARS, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center 2 USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) Study Completed 2010 Funded by The Beef Checkoff

Antibiotic and Disinfectant Susceptibility Profiles of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Cattle Feces, Hide, Carcass, and Ground Meat Isolates from the United States Executive Summary Background Escherichia coli can cause serious illnesses or fatalities in the elderly and immunocompromised humans. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that each year in the United States over 62,000 human illnesses, over 1,800 hospitalizations and 52 deaths are caused by foodborne transmission of E. coli O157:H7. The contamination of meat products with E. coli O157:H7 resulted in recall of over 1 million pounds of meat in 2005. Over 61.6 million pounds of meat products were recalled in the decade prior to 2005 because of contamination from E. coli O157:H7. Strategies used to control bacteria from the farm-to-table include the use of biocides in the form of antiseptics and disinfectants. Biocides are routinely used in animal production, the food processing industry, veterinary medicine, human medicine, consumer s homes, and are composed of a variety of active ingredients in multiple combinations. There is very limited information on disinfectant susceptibility of pathogens isolated from food-producing animals, and whether the evaluated bacteria have mechanisms that link resistance to antibiotics with the resistance to disinfectants. For instance, it was previously shown that beta-hemolytic E. coli isolated from neonatal swine with diahhrea had chlorhexidine resistance that was linked to resistance to the antibiotics gentamicin and streptomycin. Also, a large percentage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolated from community wastewater in Texas were found to have triclosan resistance higher than the levels of triclosan commonly found in household dish soap and in septic bath wash used in the hospital setting. Therefore, the disinfectant resistances found in pathogenic bacteria may allow them to persist in places treated with disinfectants that were assumed to be free of pathogens. Objectives During this study a total of 344 E. coli O157:H7 isolates from feedlot cattle feces (97 isolates from Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas), hides and carcasses (47 isolates from Kansas, Montana, Texas, and Utah), 70 isolates from hides and 30 isolates from previseration samples from culled cows (from 4 different regions), and 100 ground meat isolates obtained from processing plants were defined by disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility testing, and further by determining if certain genes were present associated with disinfectant resistance and with the expression of larger regions of DNA often associated with antibiotic resistance. Methods All isolates were confirmed as E. coli O157:H7 using R&F Escherichia coli O157:H7 Chromogenic Plating Medium (M-0300) obtained from R&F Products (Downers Grove, IL). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Antibiotic resistance was determined using the Gram-negative plates CMV1AGNF and CMV1DW obtained from Trek Diagnostic Systems Inc. (Cleveland, OH). The antibiotics tested were amikacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone,

cephalothin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and the fluoroquinolones on the CMV1DW plate were ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, marbofloxacin, and orbifloxacin. Disinfectant resistance was determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The disinfectants tested were chlorhexidine diacetate, DC&R, Tek-Trol, P-128, Betadine solution, formaldehyde, benzalkonium chloride, triclosan, MG, F25, FSS, F512, OdoBan, and the disinfectant components didecyldimethylammonium chloride (C10AC), benzyldimethyldodecylammonium chloride (C12BAC), benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium chloride (C14BAC), benzyldimethylhexadecylammonium chloride (C16BAC), and tris(hydroxylmethyl)nitromethane (THN),. Sterile dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used to solubilize some disinfectants, and reverse osmosis water (H 2 O) was produced on site by a reverse osmosis system obtained from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA). Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis was performed according to the protocol developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the banding patterns were analyzed using Bionumerics software (Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for the disinfectant suge gene used primers: forward 5 -ATCGGGTTAGCGGACTCAC-3 and reverse 5 -ATTGCTGGTCTGCTGGAAGT- 3, and the PCR-replicon typing of E. coli O157:H7 strains was performed using the method of Carattoli et al. 2005, J. Microbiol. Meth. 63:219 228. Important Results The disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 344 E. coli O157:H7 cattle feces, hide, carcass, and ground meat isolates from different parts of the United States were determined. A low incidence of antibiotic resistance was observed (14%, Table 1). The highest incidence of resistance was observed to FIS (10.5%), TET (9.9%), STR (7%), and CHL (4.9%). Two ground meat, one cull cow hide and previseration isolate were resistant to 8 antibiotics. Table 2 shows the overall disinfectant MICs. There were 69 (20%) of the isolates resistant to chlorhexidine, benzalkonium chloride, or had elevated MICs to benzyldimethyldodecylammonium chloride. All isolates were pansusceptible to triclosan. All 344 isolates were positive for the suge gene, and suge did not appear to correlate with the quarternary ammonium chlorides tested. There was spontaneous resistance (SR) at elevated levels of antibiotics (1.4%) and disinfectants (6.1%). The highest rate of SR was observed in OdoBan, ammonium chloride components, and the surface disinfectants F25, FS512, and MG used in dairies, restaurants, and food processing plants. SR could allow the presence of bacteria where they should have been removed by disinfection. High MICs (1024 4096 µg/ml) were found for the acids, acetic, lactic, and citric. The decreasing order of acid potency based on MICs molar was acetic, citric, and lactic acid. PFGE analysis was performed using XbaI digests of the E. coli O157:H7, and clusters 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1H were associated with high multi-drug resistance (MDR), but little disinfectant resistance. PFGE cluster 1C was associated with resistance to 8 antibiotics in two ground meat isolates. Similar resistance traits were observed in a cull cow hide and previseration isolate with PFGE cluster designation 1H. There was no

correlation between disinfectant resistance and antibiotic resistance in the E. coli O157:H7 isolates tested. Impact on the Beef Industry Cattle hides did not appear to be a source of MDR. But a low incidence of MDR was observed in isolates from feedlot fecal samples as well as from cull cows. Some of the highest levels of E. coli O157:H7 MDR (8 different antibiotics) were found in ground meat samples, which resembled antibiotic resistance traits observed from isolates from cull cows, and may likely be outbreak strains. Perhaps cull cows may be an important source of E. coli O157:H7 MDR, and in that regard, the application of chlorate prior to shipment may be an important way to reduce levels of MDR in cull cows. The highest incidence of resistance to benzalkonium chloride was also observed in cull cows. A low incidence of chlorhexidine resistance was observed from cattle hides, cull cows, and from feedlots; however, chlorhexidine resistance was most often associated with ground meat samples. Ground meat isolates also showed higher MICs for C12 benzylammonium chloride. Perhaps the higher MIC levels to disinfectants in ground meat isolates results from using ammonium chlorides in and around production facilities. Spontaneous resistance was observed in 6.1% of the 344 isolates tested at elevated levels of various disinfectants, predominately those containing quaternary ammonium chlorides. The spontaneous resistance at elevated disinfectant concentrations could be problematic by allowing some bacteria not to be neutralized by a disinfectant application. This could allow the presence of bacteria where they should have been removed in dairies, restaurants, or food processing plants. The study confirmed that E. coli O157:H7 demonstrated high MICs with the three acids, acetic, lactic, and citric, which is consistent with the acid resistance of E. coli O157:H7. The decreasing order of acid potency was acetic, citric, and lactic acid. Overall, there did not appear to be a correlation between disinfectant resistance and antibiotic resistance in the E coli O157:H7 tested.

Table 1. NARMS overall antibiotic MICs and resistance profiles among E. coli O157:H7 isolates. a MIC 50 MIC 90 Range No. (%) Break Antibiotic b (μg/ml) (μg/ml) (μg/ml) Resistant Point AMI 2 2 0.5 8 0 (0) 64 AMP 2 4 1 >32 9 (2.6) 32 AUG 4/2 4/2 1/0.5 >32/16 4 (1.2) 32/16 AXO 0.25 0.25 0.25 32 0 (0) 64 CHL 8 16 4 >32 17 (4.9) 32 CIP 0.03 0.03 0.015 0.25 0 (0) 4 FIS 16 >256 16 >256 ( ) c 512 FOX 8 8 2 >32 4 (1.2) 32 GEN 0.5 1 0.25 8 0 (0) 16 KAN 8 8 8 >64 4 (1.2) 64 NAL 4 4 1 >32 1 (0.3) 32 STR 32 32 32 >64 24 (7.0) 64 SXT 0.12/2.38 0.12/2.38 0.12/2.38 4/76 2 (0.6) 4/76 TET 4 8 4 >32 34 (9.9) 16 XNL 0.5 1 0.25 >8 8 (2.3) 8 a NARMS Gram-negative antibiotic overall MIC profiles of 344 E. coli O157:H7 isolates. b Antibiotic abbreviations: Amikacin (AMI), Ampicillin (AMP), Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (AUG), Ceftriazone (AXO), Chloramphenicol (CHL), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Sulfisoxazole (FIS), Cefoxitin (FOX), Gentamicin (GEN), Kanamycin (KAN), Nalidixic acid (NAL), Streptomycin (STR), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT), Tetracycline (TET), and Ceftiofur (XNL). c The FIS range on the antibiotic plates is not large-enough to observe the resistance break point.

Table 3. Distribution of disinfectant and disinfectant component susceptibility profiles among E. coli O157:H7. a MIC (μg/ml) MIC 50 MIC 90 Disinfectant b 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 (μg/ml) (μg/ml) DC&R 41 c 176 120 7 128 256 Tek-Trol 7 8 9 164 156 128 256 Chlorhexidine 1 52 252 24 13 2 0.5 1 Triclosan 1 35 187 111 10 0.25 0.5 P-128 4 90 239 11 4 4 BKC 13 47 272 12 16 16 P-I 7 22 288 27 4096 4096 MG 9 112 168 54 1 8 16 FSS 6 72 251 15 8 8 F25 6 78 249 10 1 8 8 FS512 4 89 235 15 1 8 8 OdoBan 7 33 181 114 9 8 16 Acetic acid 4 159 143 37 1 2048 4096 Lactic acid 9 266 63 6 2048 4096 Citric acid 1 91 246 6 4096 4096 C10AC d 11 226 105 2 2 4 C12BAC d 24 101 186 27 6 16 16 C14BAC d 3 26 258 56 1 8 16 C16BAC d 1 21 180 139 3 8 16 THN d 5 8 73 92 143 23 1024 2048 Formaldehyde d 1 28 271 44 64 128 a Overall susceptibility profiles of 344 E. coli O157:H7 isolated from processing plants b Disinfectant and disinfectant component abbreviations: benzalkonium chloride (BKC), providone-iodine (P-I), didecyldimethylammonium chloride (C10AC), benzyldimethyldodecylammonium chloride (C12BAC), benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium chloride (C14BAC), benzyldimethylhexadecylammonium chloride (C16BAC), and tris(hydroxylmethyl)nitromethane (THN). c Indicates the total number of isolates out of 130 total Salmonella that exhibited the indicated MIC. d These entries are disinfectant components.

Lay Summary During this study a total of 344 E. coli O157:H7 isolates from feedlot cattle feces (97 isolates from Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas), hides and carcasses (47 isolates from Kansas, Montana, Texas, and Utah), 70 isolates from hides and 30 isolates from pre-evisceration samples from culled cows (from 4 different regions), and 100 ground meat isolates obtained from processing plants were defined by disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility testing, and further by determining if certain genes were present associated with disinfectant resistance and with the expression of larger regions of DNA often associated with antibiotic resistance. A low incidence of E. coli O157:H7 MDR was observed in isolates from feedlot fecal samples as well as from cull cows. Some of the highest levels of MDR (8 different antibiotics) were found in ground meat samples, which resembled antibiotic resistance traits observed from isolates from cull cows, and may likely be outbreak strains. The highest incidence of resistance to benzalkonium chloride was also observed in cull cows. Chlorhexidine resistance was most often associated with ground meat samples. Ground meat isolates also showed higher MICs for C12 benzylammonium chloride. Perhaps the higher MIC levels to disinfectants in ground meat isolates results from using ammonium chlorides in and around production facilities. Spontaneous resistance was observed in 6.1% of the 344 isolates tested at elevated levels of various disinfectants, predominately those containing quaternary ammonium chlorides. The spontaneous resistance at elevated disinfectant concentrations could be problematic by allowing some bacteria not to be neutralized by a disinfectant application. For more information contact: National Cattlemen's Beef Association 9110 East Nichols Avenue Centennial, Colorado 80112-3450 (303) 694-0305