Microbial landscape of surgical hospital. Biology and Medicine

Similar documents
Post-operative surgical wound infection

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

Course: Microbiology in Health and Disease

Course: Microbiology in Health and Disease Office Hours: Before or after Class or by appointment

BIOL 2900 D 4.00 Microbiology in Health/Disease

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO)

Overview of Infection Control and Prevention

Objectives. Basic Microbiology. Patient related. Environment related. Organism related 10/12/2017

17June2017. Parampal Deol, Ph.D, MBA Senior Director, R&D Microbiology North America

Supplementary Appendix

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

Treatment of Surgical Site Infection Meeting Quality Statement 6. Prof Peter Wilson University College London Hospitals

The Hospital Environment as a Source of Resistant Gram Negatives

MICRO-ORGANISMS by COMPANY PROFILE

Test Method Modified Association of Analytical Communities Test Method Modified Germicidal Spray Products as Disinfectants

INFECTION PREVENTION SILVER ANTI-MICROBIAL TEXTILES

Role of the nurse in diagnosing infection: The right sample, every time

Enterobacter aerogenes

Chapter Anaerobic infections (individual fields): prevention and treatment of postoperative infections

SYMMETRY FOAMING HAND SANITIZER with Aloe & Vitamin E Technical Data

Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Sensitivity of Wound Infections

Nosocomial Antibiotic Resistant Organisms

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: A systematic review and meta analysis

SURVIVABILITY OF HIGH RISK, MULTIRESISTANT BACTERIA ON COTTON TREATED WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS AND QASM PATIENTS

No-leaching. No-resistance. No-toxicity. >99.999% Introducing BIOGUARD. Best-in-class dressings for your infection control program

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Secondary bacterial infections complicating skin lesions

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Epidemiology and Microbiology of Surgical Wound Infections

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Sensitivity of DJ Stents

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Cleaning & Sanitising Medical range. Working in harmony with nature to protect

The Disinfecting Effect of Electrolyzed Water Produced by GEN-X-3. Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University

Syllabus 2018/2019. Description of the course MICROBIOLOGY (1) Year of studies II Semester Winter X Summer. Laboratory Classes (LC)

Cipro for gram positive cocci in urine

Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)

Two (II) Upon signature

3 Infection Prevention Solutions

Importance of handwashing prior to wound dressings in prevention of nosocomial infection in surgical wards

DESCRIPTION OF THE COURSE OF STUDY

Aerobic bacterial infections in a burns unit of Sassoon General Hospital, Pune

ETHIOLOGICAL AND THERAPEUTICAL PARTICULARITIES OF URINARY INFECTIONS IN UROLOGICAL PATIENTS

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI ISOLATES AMONG DIFFERENT CLINICAL SAMPLES FROM A DIAGNOSTIC CENTER OF KANPUR

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

COURSE SYLLABUS. (Clinical Bacteriology-1

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol Vegetative Bacteria

MRSA CROSS INFECTION RISK: IS YOUR PRACTICE CLEAN ENOUGH?

Classification of Bacteria

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital,

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

OCCURRENCE OF PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA IN POST-OPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION

Nosocomial Antibiotic Resistant Organisms MRSA & VRE

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) T H E L A T E S T I N T H E G R O W I N G L I S T O F S U P E R B U G S

Study of Bacteriological Profile of Corneal Ulcers in Patients Attending VIMS, Ballari, India

gingivitis: periodontitis: dental caries: palatinitis: oral pharyngitis and tonsillitis: mouth abscess: glossitis: oro-sinus fistula: gingivitis:

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol for Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria, including Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria

TEST REPORT. Client: M/s Ion Silver AB. Loddekopinge. Sverige / SWEDEN. Chandran. min and 30 min. 2. E. coli. 1. S. aureus

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Antimicrobial resistance at different levels of health-care services in Nepal

Taking Action to Prevent and Manage Multidrug-resistant Organisms and C. difficile in the Nursing Home: Part 1 Reviewing the organisms

Infection Linelist. Infections Occurred Between 10/1/ :00:00 AM To 11/1/ :00:00 AM 2RCW2. Gastroenteritis (Adult) Urinary Tract

An evaluation of the susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative organisms isolated in cancer centres with aminoglycoside usage

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology ISSN: Volume 1 Number 1 (August-2014) pp

Principles of Infectious Disease. Dr. Ezra Levy CSUHS PA Program

The Search For Antibiotics BY: ASLEY, ELIANA, ISABELLA AND LUNISCHA BSC1005 LAB 4/18/2018

03/09/2014. Infection Prevention and Control A Foundation Course. Talk outline

Other Enterobacteriaceae

Your Guide to Managing. Multi Drug-resistant Organisms (MDROs)

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infections in Europe

amoxycillin/clavulanate vs placebo in the prevention of infection after animal

Quad Plate User s Manual

BACTERIOLOGICALL STUDY OF MICROORGANISMS ON MOBILES AND STETHOSCOPES USED BY HEALTH CARE WORKERS IN EMERGENCY AND ICU S

A Study on Bacterial Flora on the Finger printing Surface of the Biometric Devices at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

12 TIPS HOW TO TREAT BACTERIAL INFECTION WITHOUT ANTIBIOTICS

A retrospective analysis of urine culture results issued by the microbiology department, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya

Aerobic Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pus Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Hadoti Region

CUMULATIVE ANTIBIOGRAM

EcoHydra Antimicrobial Handwash. Product Overview. Physical Properties. Product Description. Regulatory Compliance. Key Features and Benefits

VCH PHC SURGICAL PROPHYLAXIS RECOMMENDATIONS

Interrupting The ECMO Circuit

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

BACTERIOLOGY OF THE HEALTHY CONJUNCTIVA*

Transcription:

eissn: 09748369 Microbial landscape of surgical hospital Biology and Medicine Research Article Volume 6, Issue 4, Article ID: BM-058-14, 2014 Indexed by Scopus (Elsevier)

www.biolmedonline.com Microbial landscape of surgical hospital Fatima Meirkhankyzy Shaizadina*, Alua Oralovna Omarova, Nessipkul Oryntayevna Alysheva, Gaziza Temiraliyevna Abuova, Marat Raikhanovich Kantemirov Karaganda State Medical University, Gogol Street 40, 100008, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan. *Corresponding author Citation: Shaizadina FM, Omarova AO, Alysheva NO, Abuova GT, Kantemirov MR (2014) Microbial landscape of surgical hospital. Biol Med 6(4), Article ID: BM-058-14, 5 pages. Received: 15 th Nov 2014; Accepted: 26 th Dec 2014; Published: 10 th Jan 2015 Abstract We have presented the results of the comparative analysis of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds in patients and microbial landscape of washings from objects of environment of a surgical hospital. It has been established that in bacterial contamination of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds, enterobacteria were found from objects of environment, it was non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria. The main agents of purulent-septic infections at admission of patients were coliform bacillus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. At repeated examination, the frequency of release of coliform bacillus decreased by 1.7 times, P. aeruginosa, on the contrary, increased by 1.5 times. From the objects of environment and from health workers, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and coliform bacillus were found. Frequency of detection of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus for 15-28 days increased by 1.1 times, the isolation rate of coliform bacillus, on the contrary, decreased by 1.5 times. With increase in the patients length of stay in a hospital, the amount of the detected cultures of agents increases in associations, among which P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli (E. coli), and S. aureus dominated. By the dismissal time from the hospital, the joined causative microorganism forced out the primary and allocated itself in a monoculture. Keywords: Nosocomial infections (NI); purulent-septic infections (PSI); microbial landscape; surgical complications. Introduction Nosocomial infections represent one of the most important and burning issues of health care [1]. Modern scientific facts given in works of foreign and domestic researchers allow to claim that nosocomial infections (NI) arise, at least, in 5-10% of the patients coming to medical institutions [1-5]. The microbial landscape of each medical and preventive treatment facility is a result of set of difficult processes of interspecific relationship of micro and macroorganisms taking place in a special environment of a hospital taking into account influence of a set of aggressive factors of the environment (physical and chemical methods of disinfection, antibiotics) [6,7]. Talking about an etiology of hospital PSI, it is necessary to emphasize their polyetiology. The extensive list of agents includes representatives of various taxonomical groups relating to bacteria (aerobic and anaerobic bacteria), mycoplasmas, viruses, protozoa, and fungi [8,9]. Etiologic agents of PSI are opportunistic pathogenic microflora (OPM), vast majority of which is autoflora of a human body [9,10]. The biological range of agents is quite various and there is no uniform point of view concerning an etiologic role of various groups of microorganisms. Objective of the research was to carry out comparative analysis of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds in surgical patients and microbial landscape of washings from objects of environment of a surgical hospital. Materials and Methods Research of bacterial load was conducted by the standard methods in bacteriological laboratory of hospital. The material sampling from patients was carried out in the conditions of operating room or dressing room, and the rules of asepsis and immediate transfer of the material to laboratory were strictly followed. The air intake of the operational block, dressing room, wards and also washings from environment, surgical equipment, Article ID: BM-058-14 Page 1 of 5

tools, dressing material, hands, and clothes of the medical personnel were carried out. In view of that antibacterial therapy and sanitation of an operational wound, undoubtedly, the microbial landscape of the center of infection changes; whenever possible an intake of material was carried out before or during the operation in the course of treatment and before the dismissal. Results and Discussion The research of bacterial load of microflora of the discharge of wounds, objects of environment, carrier level of medical personnel are objective indicators of a course of epidemic process of purulent-septic infection in a surgical hospital. Bacteriological examination of the discharge of wounds, fistulas, drainage tubes, contents of abdominal cavity has been carried out in 66 patients with postoperative complications, and 223 strains of OPM were allocated. Laboratory research from objects of environment of a hospital, nasal cavity, pharynx, and hands of the medical personnel yielded positive result in 17.8% of cases. The range of agents included representatives of both aerobic and facultative anaerobic, and obligate anaerobe bacteria. The allocated microorganisms are presented in Figure 1. When comparing microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds, washings from objects of environment of a surgical hospital and from health workers, it has been established that its qualitative structure did not differ. However, in percentage terms in a bacterial load of the discharge of complicated wounds enterobacteria (56.5% against 23.7% from objects) was found more often, while from objects of environment non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (NFGB) were found more often (38.8% against 26.5% of patients). Gram-positive cocci in the discharge of wounds made 13.5% compared to 29.6% received from washings from subjects of environment and from health workers. Other microorganisms were detected in isolated cases, including representatives the nonclostridial anaerobic bacteria, serratia, yeast-like fungi, and aspergillus. The species composition of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds in surgical patients was carried out in dynamics of treatment (Table 1). The main agents of purulent-septic infection in patients at admission was coliform bacillus (40.8 6 6.0%), then P. aeruginosa (23.7 6 5.2%), Enterobacter was detected in 8.5 6 3.4%, Proteus and Klebsiella in 6.2 6 3.0% for each, respectively, S. aureus in 5.4 6 2.8%. At repeated examination in the course of treatment, isolation rate of coliform bacillus decreased (28.7 6 5.6% and 23.8 6 5.2%, respectively). Frequency of allocation of P. aeruginosa increased by 1.5 times (34.9 6 5.9%). It testifies to nosocomial infection of the discharge of complicated wounds, caused by P. aeruginosa. For objective assessment of epidemiological situation in a surgical hospital microbiological research of washings from objects of environment, sterile, and dressing material, from hands, nasopharynx, and clothes of health Figure 1: Microbial landscape of a surgical hospital. Article ID: BM-058-14 Page 2 of 5

Table 1: Species composition of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds in surgical patients in dynamics of treatment. Microflora Frequency of examination (66 patients) 1-7 days 8-14 days 15-28 days E. coli 40.8 6.0 28.7 5.6 23.8 5.2 P. aeruginosa 23.7 5.2 34.9 5.9 34.9 5.9 Proteus 6.2 3.0 5.3 2.8 6.7 3.0 Klebsiella 6.2 3.0 6.2 3.0 7.1 3.1 Citrobacter 4.4 2.5 3.6 2.3 4.0 2.4 Enterobacter 8.5 3.4 4.0 2.4 4.4 2.5 S. aureus 5.4 2.8 8.5 3.4 7.1 3.1 S. epidermidis 1.3 1.4 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.6 Streptococcus 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 Enterococcus 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.6 Acinetobacter 1.3 1.4 3.1 2.1 Alcaligenes 1.3 1.4 2.7 1.9 Other 1.3 1.4 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.4 workers was conducted. In 82.2% of washings from subjects of environment of a hospital, growth of microorganisms was not noted, in 17.8% the microbial flora in monocultures was allocated. In the analysis of sterile, dressing, and sutural material the percent of unsterile tests made 0.6%. In tests of air from various offices of a surgical hospital in 6.2% of cases, growth of S. aureus was observed, Gram-negative microorganisms were not allocated in any of the tests were not found. Species composition of microflora of washings from objects of environment of a surgical hospital is shown in Table 2. From objects of environment of a surgical hospital and from health workers P. aeruginosa (36.7 6 2.2%), then S. aureus (27.5 6 2.1%), coliform bacillus in 17.6 6 1.8%, Proteus in 8.9 6 1.3% were often found. Microbiological research in dynamics established that the isolation rate of P. aeruginosa increased (39.9 6 2.3% and 40.2 6 2.3%, respectively). Frequency of detection of S. aureus increased by 1.1 times (28.9 6 2.1%). The isolation rate of coliform bacillus from objects of environment of a hospital, on the contrary, decreased by 1.5 times (from 17.6 6 1.8% to 11.9 6 1.5%). Table 2: Dynamics of species composition of microflora from objects of environment and from the medical workers. Microflora Frequency of examination (66 patients) 1-7 days 8-14 days 15-28 days E. coli 17.6 1.8 15.2 1.7 11.9 1.5 P. aeruginosa 36.7 2.2 39.9 2.3 40.2 2.3 Proteus 8.9 1.3 8.8 1.3 8.4 1.3 Klebsiella 3.8 0.9 3.1 0.8 1.9 0.6 Citrobacter 1.7 0.6 2.2 0.7 1.8 0.6 S. aureus 27.5 2.1 24.8 2.0 28.9 2.1 S. epidermidis 1.7 0.6 1.5 0.6 1.6 0.6 Enterococcus 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 Acinetobacter 1.8 0.6 2.3 0.7 Alcaligenes 0.4 0.3 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.4 Other 0.7 0.4 1.6 0.6 1.5 0.6 Article ID: BM-058-14 Page 3 of 5

Different types of objects which were exposed to examination for bacterial load were colonized by microorganisms in different degree. On brushes for washing hands, hands of health workers, sinks, tap knobs, hoses, anesthesiarespiratory apparatus, tanks for soaking of dirty tools, P. aeruginosa (39.1%) and coliform bacillus (19.2%) were found most often. From underwear and bed linen, couches, dressing gowns, tools, soft and firm stock, wheelchairs, staphylococcus was found more often, in 26.5% cases. Results of bacteriological tests from patients showed that at primary inspection and immediately after operation, from clinical material most often (69.5%) monocultures of microorganisms were allocated. Also E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter, Proteus, Klebsiella, S. aureus were presented. Other microorganisms were found in insignificant quantities. With increase in the patients length of stay in a hospital, the amount of the found cultures of agents in association increases. By comparison of the allocated microorganisms from patients, it was noted that in association of microorganisms with the initially allocated agent the secondary joined, among which dominated in 30.2% cases P. aeruginosa, in 21.2% E. coli, and in 8.3% of S. aureus. By the dismissal time, the joined agent forced out the primary one, allocating in a monoculture. The number of the allocated microbial associations depending on the patients length of stay in a hospital is shown in Table 3. At the same time, increase of number of association of microorganisms was explained by a secondary bacterial load of the purulent center in the course of medical manipulations in clinical conditions. Further finding of patients was followed by increase of number of association from 13.4% in 1-7 days to 26.0% in 8-14 days, with two associations of microbes (t 5 3.4; p 0.01) and from 8.0% in 1-7 days to 12.1% in 8-14 days, with three associations of microbes. The quantity of the met microorganisms in a monoculture decreases from 69.5% to 57.8% by the time of dismissal. Frequency and structure of the met microbial associations allocated from patients is presented in Table 4. From the data of Table 4, the fact attracts attention that the frequency of detection of Enterobacteriaceae associations with NFGB made 14.3%, Enterobacteriaceae with Enterobacteriaceae and NFGB with NFGB made 10.5%. two (made 63.8%) agents were found more often. Table 3: Quantity of microbial associations depending on the patients length of stay in a hospital. Days Monoculture % two microbes three microbes four and more microbes number 1-7 69.5 155 13.4 15 8.0 6 9.1 5 8-14 51.1 114 26.0 29 12.1 9 10.8 6 15-28 57.8 118 22.5 23 11.8 8 7.8 4 Table 4: Frequency of seeding of associations depending on quantity of microorganisms. Composition of microbial associations two microbes three microbes four and more microbes Enterobacteriaceae/NFGB 15 14.3 7 6.7 5 4.8 Enterobacteriaceae/Enterobacteriaceae 11 10.5 4 3.8 3 2.9 Enterobacteriaceae/Staphylococcus 6 5.7 3 2.9 2 1.9 Enterobacteriaceae/Streptococcus 4 3.8 2 1.9 1 1.0 NFGB/Staphylococcus 6 5.7 0 0 1 1.0 NFGB/NFGB 11 10.5 4 3.8 2 1.9 NFGB/Enterococcus 9 8.6 2 1.9 0 0 Staphylococcus/Streptococcus 5 4.8 1 1.0 1 1.0 Total 67 63.8 23 21.9 15 14.3 Article ID: BM-058-14 Page 4 of 5

Conclusion In a bacterial load of microflora of the discharge of complicated wounds in surgical patients, enterobacteria was found the most often (56.5%), while from objects of environment non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (38.8%) were found the most often. The main agents of PSI in patients at admission were coliform bacillus (40.8 6 6.0%), then P. aeruginosa (23.7 6 5.2%), S. aureus was found in 5.4 6 2.8%. At repeated examination in the course of treatment, the isolation rate of coliform bacillus decreased (28.7 6 5.6% and 23.8 6 5.2%, respectively). Frequency of allocation of P. aeruginosa increased by 1.5 times (8.5 6 3.4%). From objects of environment of a surgical hospital and from health workers, P. aeruginosa (36.7 6 2.2%), then S. aureus (27.5 6 2.1%), and coliform bacillus in 17.6 6 1.8% were often found. Microbiological research in dynamics established that the isolation rate of P. aeruginosa increased (39.9 6 2.3% and 40.2 6 2.3% respectively). Frequency of detection of S. aureus increased by 1.1 times (28.9 6 2.1%). The isolation rate of coliform bacillus from objects of environment of a hospital, on the contrary, decreased by 1.5 times (from 17.6 6 1.8% to 11.9 6 1.5%). With increase in the patients length of stay in a hospital, the amount of the found cultures of agents increases in associations, among which in 30.2% cases dominated P. aeruginosa, in 21.2% E. coli and in 8.3% S. aureus. By the time of the dismissal the joined agent forced out the primary agent and was allocated in a monoculture. References 1. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, et al. (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Annals of Surgery 239(5): 599-607. 2. Abashina VL, Evdokimova LP, Homichuk TF, Semeykina LM (2014) Epidemiological features of nosocomial infection in Primorsky Krai. Health Medical Ecology Science 4(58): 114-118. 3. Andreyeva TA, Bazhazhina NA (2012) Problem of nosocomial infections in obstetric facilities of Tula region. Infection and Immunity 2(1-2): 470-471. 4. Hautemaniere A, Florentin A, Hunter PR, Bresler L, Hartemann P (2013) Screening for surgical nosocomial infections by crossing databases. Journal of Infection and Public Health 6(2): 89-97. 5. Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Salomao R, Moreno CA, Mehta Y, et al. (2006) Device-associated nosocomial infections in 55 intensive care units of 8 developing countries. Annals of Internal Medicine 145(8): 582-591. 6. Dantas SR, Kuboyama RH, Mazzali M, Moretti ML (2006) Nosocomial infections in renal transplant patients: risk factors and treatment implications associated with urinary tract and surgical site infections. Journal of Hospital Infection 63(2): 117-123. 7. Weinstein RA (2005) Overview of nosocomial infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli. Clinical Infectious Diseases 41(6): 848-854. 8. Belsky DV, Rudnov VA, Cherkasov GV, Yazov OA (2012) Influence of measures of infection control on prevalence of hospital infections in departments of neurosurgical reanimation of Yekaterinburg. Ural Medical Magazine 93(1): 15-22. 9. Pokrovsky VI, Akimkin VG, Briko NI, Brusina EB, Zuyeva LP, et al. (2011) Nosocomial infections: new horizons of prevention. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases 1: 4-7. 10. Gavrilova KP, Fedorov VE (2013) The analysis of the reasons of postoperative complications in the emergency surgical practice. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences 3(3): 810. Article ID: BM-058-14 Page 5 of 5