TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Similar documents
Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

CHOOSING THE BEST TEAT DIP FOR MASTITIS CONTROL AND MILK QUALITY

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Post Milking Teat Disinfection. Prevention of Contagious and Environmental Mastitis

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Quad Plate User s Manual

Profitable Milk System

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Improve performances in Dairy farms, an efficient and global hygiene method.

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Lincomycin (as Lincomycin hydrochloride) Neomycin (as Neomycin sulphate) Excipients Disodium edetate

Milking Management II - Mastitis 1

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Mastitis: The Canadian Perspective

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol Vegetative Bacteria

TECHNOTE 8. Practise good hygiene during milking 8.1 LACTATION. Wear gloves when milking. Hands

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol for Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria, including Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria

Quality Milk. got milk? Milk Quality. Why Bacteria in Milk Matters. Bacteria in Milk. Milk.One of Mother Nature s Most Perfect Foods

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Ren Tip # 84 11/6/15

DAIRY HERD INFORMATION FORM

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

Understanding the Sources, Transmission Routes, and Prognoses for Mastitis Pathogens

MASTITIS, ANTIBIOTICS, AND RESISTANCE: A ROUND- TABLE DISCUSSION WITH DR. ROB TREMBLAY

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

Evaluation of a new qpcr test to specify reasons behind total bacterial count in bulk tank milk

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

Bulk Milk Data and Udder Health

CoPulsation tm Milking System

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Ubroseal Dry Cow 2.6 g intramammary suspension for cattle

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Goal 1: Harvest the Highest Quality Product

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

MASTITIS PATHOGENS IN MILK OF DAIRY COWS IN SLOVAKIA

Clorox Germicidal Wipes & Spray. The Easy & Most Effective Way to Disinfect

Mastitis in Dairy Goats 1

Guidelines for the administration of SureSeal

On- farm milk culture training workshop

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

DAIRY VETERINARY NEWSLETTER

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

Microbial Hazards in Dairy Industry Ceren Zeytinci

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Mastitis what is it?

Institut for Produktionsdyr og Heste

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Irish Medicines Board

Innovation in Mastitis Treatment

No-leaching. No-resistance. No-toxicity. >99.999% Introducing BIOGUARD. Best-in-class dressings for your infection control program

dry cow solutions milk quality

BIOSECURITY ON DAIRIES... ARE WE DOING ENOUGH?

Transcription:

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING KRISHIMATE AGRO AND DAIRY PVT LTD NO.1176, 1ST CROSS, 12TH B MAIN, H A L 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560008, INDIA Email: sales@srisaiagro.com Www.srisaiagro.com

Introduction The prevention of bovine mastitis is the most important component of a mastitis control program, and both pre- and post-milking teat antisepses are the most effective procedures for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy cows. These procedures involve dipping teats of dairy cows before and after milking with an appropriate germicidal preparation to reduce teat skin colonization and contamination with mastitis-causing bacteria and minimize penetration into the teat canal. Protocols for determining efficacy of teat dips have been developed and used to evaluate more than 300 experimental and commercial formulations. The protocols have been accepted by scientists, commercial companies, and regulatory agencies throughout the nation and world. Because of the attention given to efficacy of teat dip products and the availability of acceptable testing methods, manufacturers have developed highly efficacious germicidal products that reduce the incidence of mastitis by 50 to 95%. The accompanying reduction in level of mastitis in U.S. dairy herds alone represents a savings of millions of dollars annually. In the last 25 years, teat dipping or spraying with a germicidal solution immediately after every milking has been an effective management tool to reduce the rate of new IMI in dairy cows, especially those caused by the contagious pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Mycoplasma bovis, and Corynebacterium bovis. Post milking teat antisepsis is regarded as the single most effective practice for the prevention of mastitis. More recently, pre milking teat sanitization has been introduced and has been widely adopted to minimize the number of potential intramammary pathogens on teat ends prior to attachment of milking machines; these pathogens include the environmental

bacteria such as Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Establishment of IMI requires penetration of mastitis-causing organisms through the teat canal, and researchers agree that the number and types of bacteria on teat skin have a direct relationship to the incidence and type of mastitis that develops. Teat dipping is a simple, effective, and economical means to reduce bacterial populations on teat skin both before and after milking, and an abundance of published evidence shows that this practice will reduce the rate of infection among dairy cows. However, the duration of existing infections is not affected, and it may take several months before the herd level of infection is reduced after teat dipping is initiated. A variety of germicides are incorporated into teat dip products and include iodine, chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium, sodium hypochlorite, dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid, chlorine, nisin, hydrogen peroxide, glycerol monolaurate, and fatty acids. These germicides destroy bacteria through chemical or biological action such as oxidation-reduction mechanisms, denaturation/precipitation of cytoplasmic proteins, inhibition of enzyme activity, and disruption of cell membranes. Teat sanitization procedures, germicide classes used, and efficacy testing are described below. PRE DIPPING The primary objective of pre milking udder preparation and teat sanitization is to achieve an acceptable level of decontamination of teat skin. This aids in reducing the spread of microorganisms and incidence of new IMI, and in minimizing the number of bacteria that find their way into the raw milk supply. In addition, the process of preparing teats for milking has several other advantages, which include

promoting milk letdown, speeding up the milking process, and helping to ensure that the maximum amount of available milk is harvested without causing damage to the sensitive teat tissues. With the decrease in mastitis caused by contagious mastitis organisms such as Staph. Aureus and Strep. Agalactiae, concern has increased regarding mastitis caused by environmental microorganisms, especially coliforms and environmental streptococci that contaminate teats and udders primarily between milking. This has led to widespread use of a pre milking sanitation procedure known as pre dipping. This control method originated at the University of California, Davis, where researchers were attempting to prevent new cases of clinical coliform mastitis. It was theorized that pre dipping instead of udder washing before milking might help to minimize the amount of water on teat ends remaining from wash pens or prep stalls, and effectively reduce the number of bacteria on the teat surface, which serve as potential mastitis pathogens. To accomplish this, teats were dipped before milking in an iodine product instead of using an udder wash to reduce the coliform bacterial load on the teat skin, followed by drying with paper towels. This procedure was more effective than the udder wash in killing bacteria, and resulted in lowering the somatic cell count (SCC), but it was irritating to the teat skin. In addition, iodine residues were found in milk. However, switching to a lower iodine concentration for the pre dip prevented skin irritation, reduced residues in milk, and resulted in up to a 80% reduction in the new rate of infection. The effectiveness of this pre milking udder preparation procedure was confirmed in subsequent efficacy studies at Cornell University, the University of Vermont, and the University of Tennessee. Iodine concentrations in the products evaluated

in these investigations ranged from 0.1 to 0.5%, and researchers stressed the need to thoroughly dry teats prior to machine attachment to avoid iodine residues in milk. In general, pre dipping was found to reduce the incidence of new IMI with environmental pathogens by greater than 50% compared with udder washing and drying with individual paper towels. In one study, pre dipping was also found to reduce the new infection rate against Staph. aureus; however, this practice was not effective against the coagulase-negative staphylococci. The effectiveness of pre dipping is dependent upon the organic load to which teats are exposed during the inter milking period. Bacterial challenge studies as well as natural exposure trials suggest that exposure to a heavy load of environmental pathogens shortly after milking reduces the effectiveness of pre dipping. However, minimizing the bacterial load by keeping cows clean for 1 to 2 hours after milking maximizes the benefits of this practice. The pre dip procedure involves 1) Pre cleaning of teats as necessary, 2) Forest ripping, 3) Dipping or spraying teats with a proven germicidal pre dip product, 4) Allowing the recommended contact time (15 to 30 seconds), 5) Drying each teat thoroughly with a single service paper towel or laundered cloth towel to remove surplus germicidal product, microorganisms, and organic material, and

6) Attaching teat cups to the dry udder. In some instances, the preferred method is to apply the pre dip, wait the recommended contact time, and fore strip followed by wiping; the additional benefit of massaging the teat during forest ripping may massage the dip into the teat skin and aid in the removal of surface microorganisms. Pre dipping is sometimes done without prior washing of teats, and germicide is often placed on top of manure and dirt present on teat skin. This practice is not likely to reduce the incidence of mastitis or lower the SCC, and will probably reduce milk quality. Manure and dirt must be removed to realize the full benefits of pre dipping. Herds experiencing a problem with environmental mastitis should consider adopting this simple procedure. Only products proven effective should be used as pre dips and they should be used in strict accordance with manufacturer recommendations. It should be stressed that pre dipping does not replace good udder preparation, and after milking units are detached, post milking teat dipping should also be continued. When used in conjunction with all other procedures, pre dipping is an asset to the total mastitis control program. Post milking Teat Dipping The transfer of some organisms is inevitable at milking time, even under the best of hygienic conditions. To destroy mastitis organisms on teats at the end of milking, it is necessary to dip teats in a suitable disinfectant soon after milking machines are removed. Post milking teat dipping is the most effective milking hygiene practice for preventing new infections caused by the two most common contagious mastitis organisms, Staph. Aureus and Strep. Agalactiae.

The concept of teat disinfection after milking dates back to 1916, when dilute pine oil was used in an effort to reduce the spread of Strep. Agalactiae. However, the practice was not adopted widely for several decades because supporting research data were not available on existing teat dip products. The practice of post milking teat antisepsis was revived in Canada, where researchers at the University of Ontario, Guelf, showed that the practice of dipping teats in a disinfectant after milking led to reductions in mastitis-causing bacterial populations on teat cup liners. Subsequent studies at the National Institute for Research in Dairying in England confirmed Canadian observations in large field trials, and led to extensive investigations at Cornell University, where post milking was included as a component of a comprehensive mastitis control program. It is now widely accepted that the vast majority of post milking teat dip products will reduce the new infection rate by at least 50% and some products as high as 95%. Only products shown by research to be safe and effective should be used. This involves using a product registered with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The label for such products will provide information on each active ingredient, instructions for use, the manufacturer, a production lot number, and an expiration date. Responsibility for generating conclusive evidence of effectiveness belongs to the manufacturer. Dairy farmers should require evidence that a product meets FDA regulations and is effective in preventing new udder infections.