Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Similar documents
Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

The Uncommon. Bacillus cereus Clost. Perfringens Nocardia spp. Mycoplasma spp. Moulds and yeasts Pseudomonas spp.

Milking Management II - Mastitis 1

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

Reduce exposure to environmental mastitis bacteria

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR MILD AND MODERATE CASES OF CLINICAL MASTITIS. Carolina Pinzón-Sánchez

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

On- farm milk culture training workshop

Heifer Mastitis Management Strategies S.C. Nickerson, UGA,

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTITIS CAUSED BY SPECIES OF STREPTOCOCCUS AND ENTEROCOCCUS: RISK FACTORS AND CONTROL

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Last 2-3 months of lactation

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Summary. Introduction. Damage Caused by Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis

Mastitis what is it?

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

Mastitis Prevention and Cure Rates in Heifers Treated with Spectramast Dry Cow Therapy and/or Orbeseal Dry Cow Teat Sealant

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

BIOSECURITY ON DAIRIES... ARE WE DOING ENOUGH?

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

Improve performances in Dairy farms, an efficient and global hygiene method.

Mastitis in Dairy Goats 1

Managing Mastitis in Dairy Heifers to Improve Overall Herd Health

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Quality Milk. got milk? Milk Quality. Why Bacteria in Milk Matters. Bacteria in Milk. Milk.One of Mother Nature s Most Perfect Foods

J. Dairy Sci. 90: doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

Profitable Milk System

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

On-farm milk culture training workshop. Christina Petersson-Wolfe Department of Dairy Science Virginia Tech

Management Strategies to Reduce Heat Stress, Prevent Mastitis and Improve Milk Quality in Dairy Cows and Heifers

Ren Tip # 84 11/6/15

S. P. Oliver, R. A. Almeida, B. E. Gillespie, S. J. Ivey, H. Moorehead, P. Lunn, H. H. Dowlen, D. L. Johnson, and K. C. Lamar

Evaluating Herd Milk Quality Using DHI Somatic Cell Counts

Udder Health in an International Perspective

10 Smart Things Dairy Farms Do To Achieve Milking Excellence

NYS Cattle Health Assurance Program. Expansion Module Background and Best Management Practices

Management and treatment of summer cattle mastitis

MASTITIS, ANTIBIOTICS, AND RESISTANCE: A ROUND- TABLE DISCUSSION WITH DR. ROB TREMBLAY

Dairy Calf, BVDv-PI Dead & Chronic Monitoring Program

Mastitis cows and immunization

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

EC Mastitis is a Costly Disease

Mycotoxins, Mastitis and Milk

Transcription:

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control W. Nelson Philpot Professor Emeritus, Louisiana State University Phone: 318-027-2388; email: philpot@homerla.com Introduction Mastitis is unlike other diseases of dairy cattle in that it is caused by a multitude of different microorganisms, and the key to the control of all forms of mastitis is prevention. The disease is caused by more than 140 different microorganisms. The goal of every dairy farmer should be to minimize the number of organisms permitted to come into contact with the teats. Fortunately, the vast majority of mastitis cases is caused by a relatively small number of microorganisms that can be grouped into three categories: (1) contagious; (2) environmental; and (3) other. A high somatic cell count (SCC) combined with a low level of clinical mastitis usually indicates a problem with contagious mastitis, while a low SCC and a high incidence of clinical mastitis usually indicates a problem with environmental mastitis. Each group of mastitis organisms will be discussed separately because the sources and methods of control are somewhat different. Contagious Organisms The organisms of importance in this group include Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, Corynebacterium bovis, and Mycoplasma species. Spread of these pathogens from an infected cow to an uninfected cow occurs almost exclusively during the milking process. Purchased herd replacements are sometimes the source of contagious organisms not previously seen in a dairy herd. All replacement animals should be sampled and cultured to detect the presence of any contagious infections before the animals are introduced to the herd. Some general recommendations for controlling contagious mastitis organisms include: (1) milking teats that are clean and dry; (2) using good milking machines correctly; (3) dipping teats after every milking (teat spraying is almost never as effective as teat dipping); (4) treating quarters infected with Streptococcus agalactiae during lactation; (5) treating every quarter at drying off with a specially formulated antibiotic; (6) segregate known infected cows if possible, and (7) prevent heifers from becoming infected by practicing excellent fly control and possibly treating heifers at or near parturition. Some animals with chronic infections may need to be culled to prevent them from being a reservoir of infection for other animals in the herd. Streptococcus agalactiae The only reservoir of importance for Streptococcus agalactiae is infected mammary glands, thus the spread of this organism occurs during milking. A comprehensive mastitis control program should be followed that includes: (1) excellent milking hygiene; (2) use of good milking equipment in the correct manner; (3) dipping (not spraying) teats after milking with an effective teat dip; (4) treatment of every quarter at drying off; and (5) avoiding the purchase of infected animals. If a herd exhibits a high prevalence of this organism, and the bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) and bacteria count are also elevated, then culturing of milk samples from the entire herd is indicated. All lactating cows should be sampled and cultured, and all infected quarters treated one or two times with penicillin or another suitable antibiotic. In most herds, about 90% of the quarters will be cured of infection. Follow-up culture and re-treatment for a longer period of time must be performed if eradication is to be achieved within a short period of time. Animals that were not cured by the two treatment regimens should be culled immediately because they will infect other animals in the herd. Prevention of Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis is best accomplished by maintaining a closed herd. All replacement animals, including purchased heifers, must be sampled and cultured

before being added to the milking herd. Samples of bulk tank milk should be cultured on a regular basis to monitor for reinfection of the herd. Staphylococcus aureus The spread of Staphylococcus aureus occurs primarily at milking time, though a few infections may originate from the environment via flies. This organism is impossible to control by antibiotic therapy alone. Thus, control depends on preventing spread from infected quarters to uninfected quarters by following the procedures outlined under contagious organisms above. Treatment during lactation is often of little value, particularly in instances of chronic infections characterized by a high SCC. The spread of Staphylococcus aureus within a dairy herd can be reduced by milking: (1) first-lactation animals first; (2) uninfected cows second; and (3) known infected cows last. The use of vaccines against this organism has been somewhat effective, but their use should be considered as an adjunct to control programs discussed above, rather than as a replacement for those programs. Corynebacterium bovis This organism rarely causes clinical mastitis and causes only a modest increase in the SCC, usually in the range of 200,000 to 300,000. Most heavily infected herds have poor milking hygiene. New infections usually are easily prevented by the consistent application of an effective teat dip program (not teat spraying). In addition, this organism is highly susceptible to dry cow therapy. The bottom line with this organism is that herds with a high level of infection usually have not maintained adequate teat dipping and dry cow treatment programs, which should be practiced conscientiously to avoid infection with this and other mastitis pathogens. Mycoplasma species Mycoplasma organisms are extremely contagious and may spread through a herd with devastating financial consequences. The most common species is Mycoplasma bovis, though other species may also cause infections. The organisms usually enter an expanding herd via purchased replacements. It is not uncommon for herds that have experienced an outbreak of Mycoplasma mastitis to be free of the organism in lactating animals for 2 years and again have a problem when calves born during the previous outbreak freshen and enter the lactating herd. The disease should be suspected when: (1) more than one quarter (often all four quarters) have clinical mastitis; (2) affected quarters do not respond to treatment; (3) milk yield decreases quickly and significantly; and (4) abnormal secretions are observed such as watery milk with a few clots or colostrum-like secretions with sandy or flaky sediment. Herds that routinely cull such animals and practice excellent milking hygiene with effective teat dipping can avoid, or at least minimize, spread of the infections. Only commercially prepared mastitis treatment tubes should be used when infusing drugs into udders because home-prepared or veterinarian-prepared bottle mixes of antibiotics are known to become contaminated with Mycoplasma. In addition, excellent pretreatment hygiene must be used. Specific management procedures include: (1) backflushing of teat cup liners between cows to reduce spread of the organisms; and (2) segregation of cows with clinical mastitis. Extreme care must be taken not to combine cows with clinical mastitis with recently freshened cows. Moreover, regular maintenance of the milking equipment may also help minimize spread of the organisms. In herds experiencing an outbreak with Mycoplasma mastitis, cows in all infected milking strings must be cultured and affected animals should be immediately segregated or culled from the

herd. Treatment with antibiotics is of no value. Culturing of bulk tank milk on a monthly basis, and culturing of all clinical cases of mastitis, should be initiated to monitor the herd infection status. All fresh heifers and cows should be sampled and cultured before being added to the milking herd. A small percentage of infected animals will clear the infection spontaneously, but the keeping of infected animals with this hope in mind is a very dangerous practice and may be financially devastating, especially if the infected animals are not isolated in a milking string that is milked separately using excellent hygiene. Environmental Organisms The widespread belief that environmental mastitis has become more prevalent in recent years is not correct, though this form of the disease does now comprise a larger percentage of the total mastitis problem than in previous years. The reason for these conclusions is that mastitis caused by contagious organisms has decreased due to application of effective control programs. Interestingly, the incidence of mastitis caused by environmental organisms has actually decreased in the majority of dairy herds, but these organisms are now the major cause of mastitis in most wellmanaged dairy herds. Some of the environmental organisms are known to exhibit contagious characteristics because some infections are obviously spread during the milking process as evidenced by the fact that predipping aids in controlling spread of the disease. The level of infection is usually in the range of 3 to 10% of quarters and 12 to 16% of cows, with the most common organism being Streptococcus uberis. Environmental organisms can be grouped into two broad categories including: (1) streptococci (and enterococci) other than Streptococcus agalactiae; and (2) Gram-negative bacteria, primarily coliforms such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species, Citrobacter species, and Serratia species. Traditional mastitis control methods effective against contagious mastitis organisms are of limited value against organisms of environmental origin because they are widespread in the environment of the cow. Characteristics of Environmental Infections Characteristics of herds experiencing problems with environmental mastitis include the following: (1) contagious mastitis has been reduced to a minimum level; (2) herd SCC levels are low, often below 200,000; and (3) the level of clinical mastitis in unacceptably high. Management often appears to be very good, but subtle deficiencies can be identified, especially in hygiene, upon close evaluation of the environment and milking procedures. Compared to contagious organisms, the environmental organisms are: (1) of shorter duration; (2) more likely to cause clinical mastitis; and (3) less likely to cause a high SCC in herd milk because most infections become clinical and the abnormal milk is withheld from the milk supply. Infection characteristics of environmental streptococci include: (1) 40% will persist for less than 8 days; (2) 60 to 70% will persist for less than 30 days; (3) 18% will persist for more than 100 days; (4) 40 to 50% will become clinical; and (5) 50% will develop during the dry period, especially during the 2 weeks before parturition. Infection characteristics of coliforms include: (1) 57% will persist for less than 10 days; (2) 70% will persist for less than 30 days; (3) 2% will persist for more than 100 days, with most being Klebsiella species; (4) 90% will become clinical; and (5) 10% will cause peracute clinical mastitis. Reservoirs of Infection The most common sources of environmental organisms include: (1) bedding materials; (2) manure; (3) dirt and mud; (4) pools of standing water; and (5) feeds. The most important single

source is bedding materials because teats are in frequent and prolonged contact with bedding. Thus, prevention of teat contamination is critically important and the practice of maintaining bedding materials in a dry condition will aid in minimizing populations of these organisms. Experience has also shown that areas around shade areas can harbor populations of environmental organisms comparable to those found in the bedding of housed animals. Other sources of these organisms include: (1) contaminated rags and sponges used for washing udders; (2) wet and manure-covered alleyways; (3) multiple dose containers of antibiotics; (4) areas around feed bunks; and (5) contaminated treatment syringes, cannulas, and needles. Control Methods The primary emphasis must be placed on decreasing moisture in the environment and decreasing exposure of teats to potential environmental pathogens during both lactating and dry periods. Exposure of teats to the organisms can be reduced by: (1) maintaining cows on clean pastures (shade areas must also be clean); (2) using inorganic bedding such as sand in free stalls that are well maintained to minimize moisture content; (3) maintaining dry cows and heifers in the cleanest possible environment on the dairy farm, especially during the 2 weeks prior to calving; and (4) using excellent premilking hygiene, which includes predipping and the application of milking units to teats that are clean and dry. Other important control methods include: (1) treatment of every quarter of every cow at drying off; (2) feeding all animals diets that contain adequate amounts of vitamins A and E and the trace mineral selenium; (3) vaccinating cows with a mutant strain of Escherichia coli J5 vaccine for the control of Gram-negative infections; (4) using properly functioning milking equipment in the correct manner; and (5) reducing stress on animals to the practical minimum. Other Organisms The vast majority of organisms in this group rarely cause clinical mastitis and are not of serious economic importance to the dairy industry, though they do infrequently cause serious problems in dairy herds that do not practice good management. The most important other organisms will be discussed briefly, including coagulase-negative staphylococci, Serratia species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Nocardia asteroides, Prototheca species, Candida species (yeasts), and Arcanobacterium pyogenes, which was know previously as Actinomyces pyogenes, and Corynebacterium pyogenes. Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are isolated more frequently from milk samples than any other organism. They are often referred to as skin flora opportunists because they can be isolated from: (1) teat skin; (2) teat canals; (3) vaginas; (4) hair coats; and (5) nasal passages. They are neither contagious nor environmental and they rarely cause clinical mastitis. Even when they do cause clinical cases the cases are usually very mild. The CNS were largely overlooked for many years but there has been increased interest in them in recent years because of: (1) the continuing international tendency to reduce SCC enforcement standards; (2) widespread emphasis on premiums paid for high quality milk; and (3) the realization that they do cause a reduction in milk production of up to 8.7% compared to uninfected quarters. The average SCC for CNS-infected quarters is significantly higher than for uninfected quarters, usually in the range of 200,000 to 300,000, though with some quarters may have counts as high as 700,000. Traditional mastitis control methods that include teat dipping and dry cow treatment are effective in controlling the CNS, but the degree of control is less than for contagious organisms. These organisms account for 60% of all infections at first parturition, but the spontaneous cure rate

in early lactation is often as high as 40%. The infections also occur during the dry period but many disappear during the first few weeks after calving. Serratia Species Serratia organisms are of environmental origin and cause mastitis in both lactating and dry cows. They are frequently isolated from soil, water, feed, and grass. Thus, the organisms come into contact with teats from environmental sources. The infections do not respond well to antibiotic therapy. Serratia marcescens has been isolated from certain teat dips and teat dip containers, especially chlorohexidine dips. Control of these organisms is best achieved by keeping cows in as sanitary an environment as possible to minimize exposure of teats. The practice of predipping with an effective teat dip, followed by careful drying of the teats before attaching milking units, may also aid in reducing the number of contaminating organisms on teat skin. Use of the J5 mutant Gram-negative core antigen vaccine will also aid in reducing the incidence and severity of clinical cases. Pseudomonas aeruginosa When this organism is a problem, all water sources should be tested immediately. The organism has been isolated from hot water heaters that provide warm water for washing teats and udders. In addition, the organism has been isolated from: (1) wet bedding; (2) improperly cleaned milking equipment; (3) wet areas in the environment; (4) soil; (5) feces; (6) contaminated antibiotic preparations and syringes; and (7) a few non-iodophor teat dips. The cure rate from antibiotic treatment is disappointing. Elimination of infections involves: (1) culling of affected cows; or (2) destruction of mammary gland tissues by having the herd veterinarian inject an appropriate chemical. Prevention is based on: (1) preventing teat end contamination by maintaining cows in a clean and sanitary environment; (2) checking water sources for contamination; (3) using an effective predip, followed by careful drying of teats before milking; (4) sanitizing teat dippers between milkings; (5) using excellent hygiene when administering antibiotic treatments; and (6) using the J5 mutant Gram-negative core antigen vaccine. Nocardia asteroides This organism causes very refractory infections that are characterized by palpable nodules and extensive scar tissue formation. Antibiotics are of no value and almost all infections become chronic with intermittent flare-ups of mild clinical mastitis. The organisms are widespread in the environment of cattle including: (1) soil; (2) water; (3) air; (4) bird feces; (5) grass; and (6) skin of teats and udders. Other sources include: (1) contaminated homemade antibiotic products; (2) contaminated syringes, cannulas, and needles; and (3) inadequate teat sanitation prior to administering antibiotic treatments. Spread may also occur during milking by contaminated water and unsanitary milking units. Control involves preventing spread of the organisms from the sources mentioned above. Experience of the author with nocardial infections suggests the vast majority are associated with faulty treatment procedures. Affected cows must be culled or the affected quarter destroyed by having the herd veterinarian infuse an appropriate chemical to destroy the milk producing tissues. Prototheca Species These are achlorophyllic algae. They are generally classified as environmental pathogens, but they can be spread from cow to cow at milking time. The most common sources include: (1) water, including ponds, streams, and other water-contaminated sites; (2) soil; (3) feces; (4) barns

and holding areas; (5) purchased animals; and (6) contaminated bedding. They may also be spread during the process of administering antibiotic treatments due to failure to adequately sanitize teat ends. Affected cows may have either clinical or subclinical mastitis. Systemic signs rarely develop, but infected quarters may be swollen and hard. Milk yield will be depressed and the bacteria count of herd milk will be elevated. Infected cows should be milked last or with a separate milking unit until removed from the herd. Antibiotic treatment is of no value. Candida Species (Yeasts) These organisms are associated with: (1) feed products such as brewers grains; (2) plant materials; (3) soil; (4) water sources; (5) contaminated antibiotic preparations, especially multipledose homemade remedies; (6) contaminated treatment devices such as syringes or cannulas; (7) exudates from infected animals; and (8) decaying organic matter. The majority of clinical cases will regress spontaneously and antibiotics should not be used to treat such cases because they will be of no value and may actually make the clinical symptoms worse. Affected animals should be separated from other animals and extreme care should be taken during milking to avoid spreading the organisms. Arcanobacterium pyogenes This organism was previously known as Actinomyces pyogenes and as Corynebacterium pyogenes. This form of mastitis is primarily a disease of dry cows and heifers. The primary method of transmission is via blood-sucking flies, though the organisms may also be spread via contact of the teats with other contaminated materials such as in dry cow and maternity areas. The disease is characterized by acute, purulent secretion from the affected quarter that has a very pronounced foul smell. Affected quarters usually cease to function and should be dried up or the milk secreting tissues destroyed by the herd veterinarian by injecting an appropriate chemical. The frequent stripping of affected quarters may aid in minimizing the possibility of abscess formation to the exterior of the affected udder. Control of the disease is best accomplished by: (1) minimizing the fly population, especially on non-lactating animals during the summer months; (2) maintaining dry cows and heifers in a clean and sanitary environment; and (3) administering dry cow therapy to every quarter at drying off. Although drug resistance tests in the laboratory show the organisms to be sensitive to many antibiotics, drug therapy is useless. Summary Great progress can be made in controlling most forms of mastitis by following a few very practical procedures such as: (1) maintaining cows in an environment that is as clean and dry as possible; (2) milking teats that are clean and dry; (3) minimizing stress thus enhancing the ability of animals to maintain a healthy immune system and resist infections; and (4) practice excellent herd management, which may ultimately be the difference between success and failure in today s competitive dairy industry with decreasing profit margins. Remember also that for every mastitis problem, there is a solution. The preferred approach, however, is to prevent such problems rather than attempting to solve them after they develop. References Cullor, J. S. 1991. The Role of Vaccines in Prevention and Moderation of Clinical Mastitis. Proceedings of the 30 th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, Inc., 5944 Seminole Center

Court, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711. Page 68. Erskine, R. J. 1993. Nutrition and Mastitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 9:551. Erskine, R. J., J. H. Kirk, J. W. Tyler, and F. J. DeGraves. 1993. Advances in the Therapy for Mastitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 9:499. Hogan, J. S., R. N. Gonzalez, R.J. Harmon, S. C. Nickerson, S. P. Oliver, J. W. Pankey, and K. L. Smith. 1999. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Published by the National Mastitis Council, Inc., 5944 Seminole Center Court, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711. Hogan, J. S., W.P. Weiss, and K. L. Smith. 1993. Role of Vitamin E and Selenium in the Host Defense Responses to Mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 76:2795. Oliver, S. P., M. J. Lewis, B. E. Gillespie, and H. H. Dowlen. 1992. Influence of Prepartum Antibiotic Therapy on Intramammary Infections in Primigravid Heifers During Early Lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 75:406. Philpot, W. N. and S. C. Nickerson.2000. Winning the Fight Against Mastitis. Book Published by Westfalia-Surge, Inc., 1880 Country Farm Drive, Naperville, IL 60563. Shrearer, J. K. and D. R. Bray. 1995. Mastitis in Heifers. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 9:583. Smith, K. L., and J. S. Hogan. 1997. Risk Factors for Environmental Streptococcal Intramammary Infections. Proceedings of the Symposium on Udder Health Management for Environmental Streptococci. Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Canada. Weiss, W. P., J. S. Hogan, D. A. Todhunter, and K. L. Smith. 1997. Effect of Vitamin E Supplementation in Diets With a Low Concentration of Selenium on Mammary Gland Health of Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80:1728. Woolford, M. W. 1995. Milking Machine Effects on Mastitis Progress 1985-1995. Proceedings of the third IDF International Mastitis Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel. Ziv. G. 1995. Treatment of Mastitis: An Overview of Progress During the Last Ten Years. Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel.