Metabolic Characterization of Brucella Strains that

Similar documents
STUDIES ON BACTERIOPHAGE AND METABOLIC IDENTIFICATION OF BRUCELLA STRAINS *

Phages. The Tbilisi phage (Vershilova and

Classification of the genus Brucella : the current position(*)

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HUMAN BRUCELLOSIS IN

Brucellosis surveillance and control in Zimbabwe: bacteriological and serologies~ investigation in dairy herds

PENICILLIN, STREPTOMYCIN, TETRACYCLINE,

Sera from 2,500 animals from three different groups were analysed:

suis. The multiple amino acid media devised by these workers (KBD and MMHRB) contained cystine and methionine as organic sources of sulfur.

Bovine Brucellosis Control of indirect ELISA kits

Recent Topics of Brucellosis

THE AGGLUTINATION TEST IN UNDULANT FEVER DUE TO BRUCELLA ABORTUS. A PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE VALUE OF THE "ABORTOSCOPE."

The effect of environmental temperature on the growth of vertebrae in the tail of the mouse

B. suis and B. abortus and since completely satisfactory

Ampicillin in the treatment of brucellosis

Abstract. Introduction

Methods for Measuring Insecticide Susceptibility Levels in Bed-bugs, Cone-nosed Bugs, Fleas and Lice

Commercial imports into the Union of dogs, cats and ferrets

Original article. Genetic study on Dandarawy chickens. II. Heritability of live and carcass measurements. M.A. Abdellatif

Classificatie: intern

The Effect of Enzyme Treatments on Brucella abortus Cell Walls

Salmonella. Serological. Salmonella. food poisoning. Use of pasteurized milk and milk products Improvement of hygiene. Proper storage of foods

Taxonomic Position in the Genus Brucella of the Causative Agent of Canine Abortion

and other serological tests in experimentally infected cattle

HIGH DENSITY DIETS FOR DWARF LAYERS (1)

Increase of egg weight with age in normal and dwarf, purebred and crossbred laying hens

Present pattern of antibiotic sensitivity of gonococcal

Surveillance of Brucella Antibodies in Camels of the Eastern Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

The Salmonella. Dr. Hala Al Daghisatni

> THE LABORATORY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS*

CHAPTER - I INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus

Human brucellosis: An evaluation of antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis

A SEROLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ON ADULT CATTLE VACCINATED WITH BRUCELLA ABORTUS STRAIN 19

Radial Immunodiffusion Test with a Brucella Polysaccharide Antigen for Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Cattle

Comparative Evaluation of Microagglutination Test and Serum Agglutination Test as Supplementary Diagnostic Methods for Brucellosis

Procedures for the Taking of Preventive and Eradication Measures of Brucellosis for Swine

Revaccination with a reduced dose of Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccine of breeding cows in the Pampas region of Argentina

DISEASE DETECTION OF BRUCELLOSIS IN GOAT POPULATION IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA. Abstract

INFECTIOUS ABORTION INVESTIGATIONS

Summary. Plymouth Rock (PP), Light Sussex (SS) and their recriprocal Crosses. Sixteen

SENSITIVE AND -RESISTANT TUBERCLE BACILLI IN LIQUID MEDIUM SENSITIVITY TESTS

HERITABILITY ESTIMATES OF HATCHING

Brucellosis OIE Twinning Laboratory Program France-Thailand

UNCLASSIFIED AD ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA UNCLASSIFIED

2012 Work Programme of the

';!:l,io9l'f."'jt:';nf;,"';:lj:;,y;'fr:r"";t,mribution

Antigens of Brucella abortus

I yellow, a great assortment of shades of red and yellow being known. The

quality factors when a one-sided selection for shell quality is practised?

BRUCELLOSIS. Morning report 7/11/05 Andy Bomback

Epidemiology - Animal Tracing Exercise. Gregory Ramos DVM, MPVM Area Epidemiology Officer USDA/APHIS/VS

Surveillance of animal brucellosis

Crocodiles: An Action Plan For Their Conservation (Iucn/Ssc Action Plans For The Conservation Of Biological Div) By John Thorbjarnarson;Harry

A STUDY ON THE SEROPREVALENCE OF BRUCELLOSIS IN HUMAN AND GOAT POPULATIONS OF DISTRICT BHIMBER, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR ABSTRACT

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS

Communication de la session de Reproduction

Abortion and serological reaction of ewes after conjunctival instillation of Salmonella enterica subsp enterica ser abortusovis

Implementation of Bovine and Small Ruminant s Brucellosis Eradication Programmes in Portugal PAFF Standing Committee Brussels, 8 June 2017

Inheritance of coat and colour in the Griffon Bruxellois dog

INFLUENCE OF CONTAMINATION OF ENVIRONMENT AND BREEDING CONDITIONS ON DEVELOPMENT OF COCCIDIOSIS IN CHICKENS

Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air

EDUCATION OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS ON PRUDENT USE OF ANTIBIOTICS: ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT

Sensitivity and specificity of an indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay for the diagnosis of Brucella canis infectionindogs

Polymorphism of egg white proteins

CANINE BRUCELLOSIS IN FLORIDA: SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF POUND DOGS, ANIMAL SHELTER WORKERS AND VETERINARIANS

The breeding scheme of the Karagouniko sheep in Greece

Ch. 7 BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 7. BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS

Hemolysis Test for Cattle Vaccinated and Infected with

Cercetări bacteriologice, epidemiologice şi serologice în bruceloza ovină ABSTRACT

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Brucellosis in Ringed Seals and Harp Seals from Canada

Diagnosis of human brucellosis caused by Brucella canis

DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN SERUM PROTEINS, LIPIDS AND CHOLESTEROL DURING THE COURSE

The Use of Homologous Antigen in the Serological Diagnosis of Brucellosis Caused by Brucella melitensis

A Novel PCR Assay for Detecting Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis

Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & 2002

A Directory of. Crocodilian Farming. Operations

Article 3 This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European

Report and Opinion 2015;7(2) Arabia.

Factors affecting plate assay of gentamicin

Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit

The King Of The Snakes And Other Folk-Lore Stories From Uganda (Illustrated Edition) (Dodo Press) By Mrs George Baskerville

Applied Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology: Identification of aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria

Distribution of thiabendazole and thiophanate-methyl resistant strains of Helminthosporium solani and Fusariurn sambucinum in Alberta potato storages

Office International des Épizooties World Organisation for Animal Health created in 1924 in Paris

In Vitro Susceptibility of Brucella

C 1TO 3. VIII. Notice on the Iguanodon, a newly discovered fossil, from the sandstone of Tilgate, m Sussex. By G ideon. Read February 10, 1825.

GOOD NIGHT. Industrial Style Lamps

OIE Reference Laboratory Reports Activities

Morphological variability, host range and distribution of ticks. of the R hipicephalus sanguineus complex in Israel

Effective host defense depends mainly upon cell-mediated immunity.

Enterobacter aerogenes

DE / ENG: Preise, Infos und Bestellungen: phone / mobil + WhatsApp / SKYPENAME: office

Udder conformation and its heritability in the Assaf (Awassi East Friesian) cross of dairy sheep in Israel

Article available at or

VALUE OF FLUORESCENCE POLARISATION ASSAY IN COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES IN DIAGNOSIS OF PORCINE BRUCELLOSIS

EFSA-EMA Joint Scientific Opinion

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); August 2017

Egg production response of sex-linked

Transcription:

Bull. Org. mond. Sante' 1962, 26, 823-827 Bull. Wld Hlth Org. Metabolic Characterization of Brucella Strains that Show Conflicting Identity by Biochemical and Serological Methods* MARGARET E. MEYER, B.S., Ph.D.' & W. J. B. MORGAN, B.V.Sc., Ph.D.2 Each of 87 strains of brucellae examined for its utilization of amino acid and carbohydrate substrates displayed a metabolic pattern that characterized it as to its species identity, irrespective of its serological and biochemical characters. Strains that displayed the metabolic pattern of Br. abortus were lysed by Brucella bacteriophage type abortus strain 3. Strains that displayed the metabolic pattern of Br. melitensis were not lysed by this phage. On this basis of identification, it is shown that there occur strains of Br. abortus that do not produce hydrogen sulfide, do not require carbon dioxide and are thionin-resistant, thereby duplicating the features generally regarded as characteristic of Br. melitensis. They can be identified by their metabolism and phage susceptibility. The distribution of Br. abortus and Br. melitensis antigens, as measured by agglutination with monospecific antisera, is also not always related to other species-identifying characteristics. Therefore, neither the serological method nor the biochemical method can be considered a reliable guide to the identification of Brucella species. Brucella organisms are ordinarily identified as members of a species by the conventional biochemical methods of Huddleson (1929) and, to a lesser extent, by the serological test of agglutination with monospecific antisera (Wilson & Miles, 1932). Investigators who have attempted to correlate the serological identity of organisms with the results of typing by the biochemical method have reached contradictory conclusions. Veazie & Meyer (1936), after comparing the results of the two methods in the typing of over 400 strains, concluded that serological identification was an indispensable aid to proper classification. Wilson (1933), Castaiieda et al. (1942), and Brim et al. (1950) have also reported favourably upon the use of agglutinin absorption for typing purposes. Conversely, Kabler & MacLanahan (1936) reported that 9 of 41 strains failed to fit into any of the * The work reported herein was supported by a grant from the World Health Organization. ICentral Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey, England. Permanent address: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Calif., USA. ' Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey, England. species and concluded that this test was of no value for identification purposes. Spink (1956) stated that he had abandoned the use of serological procedures because of difficulties encountered in the preparation of satisfactory antisera, although others (Jones, 1958) have not had this difficulty. Other investigators, rather than ignore the results of one or the other procedures, report identity according to both sets of tests. As a consequence, there are numerous references in the literature to Brucella strains that actually are not classified as to species, but are described in terms of their biochemical and serological behaviour. Organisms that have not been classified specifically are referred to as Br. melitensis biochemically, Br. abortus serologically (Taylor et al., 1932; Wilson, 1933; Veazie & Meyer, 1936; Renoux, 1952; Cruickshank, 1954; Pickett & Nelson, 1955); Br. melitensis biochemically, but with more Br. abortus antigen than usual (Stableforth, 1959); Br. melitensis biochemically, but with equal amounts of Br. melitensis and Br. abortus antigens (Gargani et al., 1957); Br. melitensis that requires carbon dioxide (Stableforth, 1959); and Br. abortus biochemically, Br. melitensis serologic- 1142 823-

824 M. E. MEYER & W. J. B. MORGAN ally (Wilson, 1933; Cruickshank, 1954; Pickett & Nelson, 1955). Prior to the introduction of the manometric method of species identification, there was no method of establishing the comparative value of the conventional biochemical techniques and of the serological test for identification of these organisms. By the use of manometric methods, Meyer & Cameron (1961a) have recently presented evidence that it is possible to identify correctly the organisms in the genus Brucella according to the oxidative metabolic patterns formed by their utilization of amino acid and carbohydrate substrates. These patterns were found to be consistent and definitive for each species, inclusive of their biotypes (Meyer & Cameron, 1961 b) and of variants that displayed biochemical features anomalous of a species (Meyer, 1961 a). Additionally, it was found (Meyer, 1961b) that all strains that were classified metabolically as Br. abortus were susceptible to Brucella bacteriophage, type abortus, strain 3, and that all strains that displayed a metabolic pattern characteristic of another species were not lysed by this phage at the routine test dilution. To determine whether the distribution of Br. abortus and Br. melitensis antigens is, in fact, related to other species-identifying characteristics, the oxidative metabolic patterns and susceptibility to lysis by Brucella bacteriophage, type abortus, strain 3, were determined on 87 strains of Brucella that displayed the characteristics of one species by the conventional biochemical methods and of another species by agglutination with monospecific antisera. The results of this study are reported herein. MATERIALS AND METHODS All manometric procedures and materials used in this study were identical with those described previously by Meyer & Cameron (1961a, 1961b). The assessment of phage susceptibility was performed as described by Morgan et al. (1960) and Meyer (1961b). The concentration of phage particles used for the routine test dilution was 2.0x 106 plaque-forming units per ml. Monospecific antisera were prepared and used as reported by Jones (1958). The conventional determinative methods were carried out as recommended by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis (1953, 1958). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The accompanying table shows 87 strains of brucellae that have been segregated into eight groups according to the combination of biochemical and serological characteristics that they possess. Group 1-4 represent strains of Brucella which unquestionably possess the biochemical characteristics of Br. abortus, display the metabolic pattern that is singular for this species, and are susceptible to lysis by a strain of phage that lyses only Br. abortus, even though the Br. melitensis antigen predominates as the one measurable by agglutination with monospecifically absorbed antisera. Groups 5 and 6 contain strains that have been described as Br. melitensis biochemically and Br. abortus serologically. These can be divided into two categories. By the conventional determinative methods, the organisms in group 5 display the characteristics generally regarded as identifying for the species Br. melitensis. However, each of these strains agglutinated only with Br. abortus antisera, displayed the metabolic pattern of Br. abortus, and was lysed by the Br. abortus bacteriophage. These organisms are evidently strains of Br. abortus that do not produce hydrogen sulfide. In relation to the present classification scheme of species with biotypic variants (Huddleson, 1957), they should be considered as a biotype of Br. abortus. They differ from those described by Bevan (1930) as non-carbon-dioxiderequiring, thionin-resistant strains (commonly referred to as Rhodesian abortus) only by the single characteristic of not producing hydrogen sulfide. By the conventional tests, these strains duplicate exactly the characteristics of Br. melitensis. However, they can be identified accurately by their oxidative metabolism and by their phage susceptibility. The strains in group 6 have also been described as Br. melitensis biochemically and Br. abortus serologically. These organisms differ from those in group 5 in that they display the metabolic pattern of Br. melitensis and are not lysed by the phage that lyses Br. abortus. Even though the predominant antigen that is measurable by present techniques is the Br. abortus antigen, these organisms possess all the other species-identifying characteristics of Br. melitensis and it is suggested that they be classified as such. Group 7 contains 18 strains described as Br. melitensis biochemically but containing both antigens. Organisms of this description can also be divided into two categories-those that are metabolically Br. melitensis and not susceptible to the phage (group 7), and those that are metabolically Br. abortus and are phage-susceptible (group 8; 2 strains). They differ from their counterparts in

METABOLIC CHARACTERIZATION OF BRUCELLA STRAINS 825 OXIDATIVE METABOLISM AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BRUCELLA BACTERIOPHAGE, TYPE ABORTUS, STRAIN 3, OF 87 BRUCELLA STRAINS THAT SHOW CONFLICTING IDENTITY BY BIOCHEMICAL AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS Description of strains Number strains Results of conventional biochemical tests Oxidative metabolic pattern a Susceptibility to phage Species identity GROUP l: Br. abortus, type 1 biochemically, Br. melitensis serologically GROUP 2: Br. melitensis serologically. GROUP 3: Br. abortus, type 11 biochemically, Br. abortus, type III biochemically, Br. melitensis serologically. 31 Require C02 for isolation. Grow on basis fuchsin. Do not grow on thionin. 2 Require C02 for isolation. No growth on dyes. Require serum for growth. 1 Require C02 for isolation. Grow on both dyes. All strains in groups 1, 3, 4 and 5 oxidize: L-alanine (40-241), L-glutamic acid (72-490), L-asparagine (64-301), L-arabinose (45-161), D-galactose (50-296), D-ribose (132-446). They do not oxidize: DL-ornithine, DL-citrulline, L-arginine or L-lysine. 2, All strains in groups 1-5 were lysed. Brucella abortus GROUP 4: Br. abortus, type III biochemically, agglutinate monospecific antisera of both species. 2 Same as group 3. GROUP 5: Br. melitensis biochemically Br. abortus serologically. I11 Do not require CO2. Do not produce H2S. Grow on both dyes. GROUP 6: Br. melitensis biochemically, Br. abortus serologically. 20 Same as group 5. None of these strains oxidizes: L-arabinose, D-galactose, D-ribose, DL-ornithine, DL-citrulline, L-arginine, L-lysine. None of these strains was lysed. Brucella melitensis GROUP 7: Br. melitensis biochemically, agglutinate monospecific antisera of both species. GROUP 8: 18 Same as group 5. Same as group 6. None of these Brucella strains was melitensis lysed. I ~~ Same description as group 7. 2 Same as group 5. Same as groups 1-5. Both strains Brucella were lysed. abortus a Figures in parentheses show the ranges in rates observed for all strains in groups 1-5. For the validity of the rate ranges, see Meyer & Cameron (1961a, 1961b).

826 M. E. MEYER & W. J. B. MORGAN groups 5 and 6 only in the quantitative distribution of measurable antigens. From the data presented in the table, it can be seen that each of the 87 Brucella strains displayed a pattern of oxidative metabolism that was identical both qualitatively and quantitatively with the pattern of substrate utilization previously established as definitive and characteristic for the species of Br. abortus or Br. melitensis, and that the susceptibility to lysis by Brucella bacteriophage, type abortus, strain 3, was correlated consistently with the metabolic pattern. Therefore, irrespective of the predominant antigen or antigens measurable by agglutination with monospecific antisera, or of their biochemical characters, each of these strains could be accurately classified into an existing species and biotype. It has been known since the original report by Wilson & Miles (1932) that Br. abortus and Br. melitensis contained qualitatively similar antigens which varied in quantitative distribution. The evidence presented herein shows that the quantitative antigen distribution varies not only from species to species, but also within a species, and that this antigen distribution is frequently unrelated to other species characteristics. Wilson & Miles (1932) also reported that the species of Br. suis was intermediate between the other two species in its antigenic structure, but that it could not be distinguished from Br. abortus when monospecific antisera were used for identifying cultures. However, Br. suis has continuously been regarded as a species distinct from Br. abortus. It is now known that the two species differ both quantitatively and qualitatively in their metabolism and phage susceptibility as well as in their growth patterns on basic fuchsin and thionin, and that they show decidedly different animal host preferences. It therefore seems unjustifiable taxonomically to use the serological test of Wilson & Miles (1932) for species differentiation when it will not distinguish antigenically such otherwise definable organisms as Br. suis and Br. abortus. CONCLUSION The foregoing has demonstrated that there occur strains of Br. abortus that do not produce hydrogen sulfide, do not require carbon dioxide and are thionin-resistant, thereby duplicating the features generally regarded as characteristic of Br. melitensis. They can be identified by their metabolism and phage susceptibility. The distribution of Br. abortus and Br. melitensis antigens, as measured by agglutination with monospecific antisera, is also not always related to other species-identifying characteristics. Therefore, neither the serological method nor the biochemical method can be considered a reliable guide to the identification of Brucella species. RIESUMJ2 L'agglutination par antiserums A specificite univoque est un mode serologique d'identification des organismes faisant partie du genre Brucella. Elle constitue souvent meme une methode utilis6e pour decider de l'appartenance des souches etudiees A une espece donnee. Or, les chercheurs qui se sont attaches a determiner la valeur de la serologie comme procede de typage sont parvenus A des conclusions contradictoires. Cependant, avec l'application A l'identification des Brucella des techniques manometriques, on est desormais en possession d'une methode qui permet de faire une discrimination qualitative parmi les especes et de mesurer avec precision des differences quantitatives. I1 peut etre affirme que les m6thodes tant biochimiques que serologiques sont d'un grand interet pratique pour la diff6renciation des especes appartenant A ce genre. Au total, 87 souches Brucella qui faisaient partie chimiquement d'une espece et serologiquement d'une autre espece ont ete examinees au point de vue des caracteristiques de leur metabolisme d'oxydation et de leur sensibilite au bacteriophage de Brucella, type abortus, souche 3. Dans bien des cas, il est apparu que l'identite serologique des souches Brucelia ne correspondait pas A celle donnee par leur metabolisme ou leur sensibilite au bacteriophage; il en est souvent de meme des caracteristiques biochimiques. Ainsi, A titre d'exemple, il existe des souches de B. abortus qui ne produisent pas d'hydrogene sulfure, proliferent en l'absence d'anhydride carbonique, et sont resistantes a la thionine - toutes caracteristiques qui sont, en general, reconnues A B. melitensis. En conclusion, les procedes serologiques ou biochimiques ne permettent pas d'identifier l'espece en toute certitude A l'interieur du genre Brucella.

METABOLIC CHARACTERIZATION OF BRUCELLA STRAINS 827 REFERENCES Bevan, L. E. W. (1930) Brit. med. J., 2, 267 Brim, A., Morris, J. F. & Sunkes, E. J. (1950) J. Lab. Clin. Med., 35, 483 Castanieda, M. R., Tovar, R. & Velez, R. (1942) J. infect. Dis. 70, 97 Cruickshank, J. C. (1954) J. Hyg. (Lond.), 52, 105 Gargani, G., Benelli, S. & Guerra, M. (1957) Boll. Ist. sieroter. milan., 36, 41 Huddleson, I. F. (1929) Tech. Bull. Mich. agric. Exp. Sta., 100 Huddleson, I. F. (1957) In: Breed, R. S., Murray, E. G. D. & Smith, W. R., ed., Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 7th ed., Baltimore, Md., Williams & Wilkins, p. 404 Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis (1953) Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 67 Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis (1958) Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 148 Jones, L. M. (1958) Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 19, 177 Kabler, P. & MacLanahan, M. (1936) J. infect. Dis., 58, 293 Meyer, M. E. (1961a) J. Bact., 82, 401 Meyer, M. E. (1961b) J. Bact., 82, 950 Meyer, M. E. & Cameron, H. S. (1961a) J. Bact., 82, 387 Meyer, M. E. & Cameron, H. S. (1961b) J. Bact., 82, 396 Morgan, W. J. B., Kay, D. & Bradley, D. E. (1960) Nature (Lond.), 188, 74 Pickett, M. J. & Nelson, E. L. (1955) J. Bact., 69, 333 Renoux, G. (1952) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 83, 814 Spink, W. W. (1956) The nature of brucellosis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press Stableforth, A. W. (1959) Diseases due to bacteria. In: Stableforth, A. W. & Galloway, I. A., ed., Infectious diseases of animals, New York, Academic Press, vol. 1, p. 58 Taylor, R. M., Lisbonne, M. & Roman, G. (1932) Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 49, 284 Veazie, L. and Meyer, K. F. (1936) J. infect. Dis., 58, 280 Wilson, G. S. (1933) J. Hyg. (Lond.), 33, 516 Wilson, G. S. & Miles, A. A. (1932) Brit. J. exp. Path., 13, 1