American Journal of Current Microbiology Ojiagu NC et al. American Journal of Current Microbiology 2016, 4:80-86 http://ivyunion.org/index.php/ajcmicrob/ Page 1 of 7 Research Article Prevalence and Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates from Commonly Shared Public Objects Ojiagu David-Kingsley 1*, Ojiagu NC 1, Okeke CB 1, and Umeoduagu ND 2 1 Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B. 5025, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria 2 Tansian University, Umunya, Anambra State, Nigeria Abstract The prevalence, characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on vehicular gate passes and ATMs, two most likely shared public objects, at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria were studied. A total of 390 of plastic gate passes and 364 of ATMs within the premises of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria were sampled for bacterial isolation during a period of 24 weeks. Surface swabs of samples were collected and used for S. aureus enrichment and isolation. Presumptive positive colonies were further identified Gram staining test, catalase test and coagulase test. S. aureus were screened by meca gene amplification with multiplex PCR. Only the meca-positive S. aureus isolates were selected for antimicrobial sensitivity assay. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of isolates to different antibiotics was tested by disk diffusion reference method. S. aureus was isolated from 30% (117/390) of plastic gate passes and 44.8% of ATMs (163/364). With meca amplification, 14.5% and 20.2% of the S. aureus isolates from gate passes and ATMs were identified as MRSA, respectively. Multidrug resistance to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, oxacillin, penicillin G, rifampin, streptomycin, and tetracycline was recorded among the isolated MRSA from both sources. Implicated MRSA in samples present severe health-risk potentiality together with significant extensive antibiotic resistance. Keywords: MRSA; ATMs; vehicular gate passes; meca; multidrug resistance Academic Editor: Xiaoning Peng, MD, PhD, Hunan Normal University School of Medicine, China Received: July 11, 2016; Accepted: August 12, 2016; Published: September 21, 2016 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Copyright: 2016 Sudulagunta SR et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. *Correspondence to: Ojiagu David-Kingsley, Department of Applied Microbiology and Brewing, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria Email: ku.ojiagu@unizik.edu.ng
Page 2 of 7 1. Introduction Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium found commonly in the nostrils and on the skin of humans, has been implicated in a number of diseases in humans, ranging from minor skin infections to several difficult-to-treat infections, such as necrotizing pneumonia, necrotizing fasciitis, pyomyositis, and bacteremia [1]. It is an important human pathogen transmitted in hospitals and the community. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) refers to strain of S. aureus that has developed resistance to methicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics. The infections they caused were traditionally associated with hospitalization or surgery (health care-associated MRSA [HA-MRSA]); however, cases of MRSA have been identified in which no risk factors for MRSA infection were found [2]. On the other hand, community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) has emerged as a major public health concern worldwide due to spread of isolates with decreased susceptibilities to several antibiotics classes [3] outside the hospital setting. The ability of MRSA s to survival for weeks (or even months) on inanimate objects, especially common shared objects by the public, has in part aided to its endemicity in communities. The occurrence of CA-MRSA has accounted for an increasing amount of infections acquired among wrestling players, soldiers, and students, which has also proven difficult to identify them from its HA-MRSA counterpart [4]. The past three decades have seen a dramatic shift in the epidemiology of MRSA infection, with infections developing in those without previous contact with the healthcare system [5]. Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) are a huge part of the financial lives of Nigerians especially for cash withdrawals and funds transfer. It is estimated that an average of 14 million Nigerians use ATMs daily with students of tertiary institutions responsible for about 60 % of the total. Therefore, this study was conducted to characterise MRSA isolates and assess their prevalence on gate passes for vehicular admittance and on automated teller machines located within the bustling premises of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria during a defined period of time. 2. Methodology 2.1 Sample collection. The subjects of this study were situated within the premises of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. During a 24-week period in 2015 (March August), 390 swab samples were collected randomly from plastic gate passes with 30 samples each drawn fortnightly; and 364 samples were collected from swabs of keypads and monitors of automated teller machines (ATMs) over the same period and sampling interval. Also to note, 28 ATMs are located within the sampling area and an average of 2000 plastic gate gasses exist. Prior to sample collection, swab sticks were moistened with sterile normal saline. 2.2 Isolation and characterisation. Swab samples were placed in sterile bags containing 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Bags were transported to our laboratory immediately and were vigorously shaken for 2 minutes to disassociate bacteria from the cotton fiber; then 1 ml of each rinsate was transferred to 9 ml brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (containing 6.5% NaCl) and incubated for 24 to
Page 3 of 7 48 h at 37 C. After incubation, 1 ml of aliquots from positive BHI cultures were transferred into mannitol salt broth and incubated for 48 h at 37 C. Swabs from positive mannitol salt broth cultures were transferred onto mannitol salt agar plates for isolation of staphylococci. Plates were incubated for 24 to 48 h at 37 C. Presumptive positive colonies were plated on blood agar and identified as presumptive S. aureus using the Gram staining test, catalase test and coagulase test [6]. The meca gene contained in the mec region primarily mediates MRSA s resistance towards methicillin and other beta-lactam antimicrobials [7,8], and the most commonly known carrier of the meca gene is MRSA. Therefore, the presence of meca gene in presumptive S. aureus isolates was detected by multiplex PCR using the primer set with nucleotide sequence: 1) 5 - AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGG 3, and 2) 5 - AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTG 3. The product of 530 bp was visualized by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel supplemented with a 100bp molecular marker [9]. 2.3 Antimicrobial susceptibility. Only the meca-positive S. aureus isolates were selected for antimicrobial sensitivity assay. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of isolates to different antibiotics was revealed by disk diffusion reference method [10]. The test pure isolates were selected and prepared using the direct colony suspension technique with turbidity of test suspension standardized to match that of a 0.5 McFarland standard. The tested antimicrobials were ampicillin (10µg), ceftriaxone 30(µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), erythromycin (30µg), gentamicin (10µg), oxacillin (1µg), penicillin G (10µg), rifampin (5µg), streptomycin (10µg), and tetracycline (30µg) of standard strengths on Mueller-Hinton agar at 35 C for 16 18 h. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a quality control strain. 3. Results 3.1 Prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA. During a 24-week period from March to August of 2015, 390 gate passes of used vehicular admittance and 364 swabs of user interfaces of automated teller machines, all located within the same premises, were collected to test for the presence of staphylococci (Table 1). Out of the 390 gate-pass samples, 117 implicated the presence of S. aureus. Also, out of the 364 swab samples drawn from user interfaces of ATMs, 163 showed the occurrence of S. aureus. Overall, 30% (117/390) of the plastic gate pass and 44.8% (163/364) of the ATMs were positive for S. aureus (Table 1). S. aureus positive for meca was identified in 17 of the gate-pass samples, and 33 of the ATM samples; presenting respectively 4.4 % of the total gate passes samples and 9.1 % of the total ATM samples (Table 1). In antimicrobial susceptibility testing, all meca-positive S. aureus isolates were resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, oxacillin, and penicillin (Table 2). All meca-positive S. aureus implicated on the ATMs showed resistance to ciprofloxacin, while 82.6 % from gate passes were resistant to it. Only 1 and 5 meca-positive S. aureus bacteria showed resistance to streptomycin and tetracycline respectively. All tested meca-positive isolates were susceptible to rifampin. Overall, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (oxacillin-resistant) were generally resistant to 5 of the 10 antimicrobials tested with pockets of resistance recorded with some antimicrobials (Table 2).
Page 4 of 7 TABLE 1 Prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA on vehicular gate passes and ATMs No. (%) of sample positives Item (n) No. of samples For S. aureus For meca Gate pass (390) Week 0 30 9 (30) 1 (3.3) 2 30 13 (43.3) 2 (6.7) 4 30 7 (23.3) 0 (0) 6 30 15 (50) 3 (10) 8 30 7 (23.3) 1 (3.3) 10 30 9 (30) 1 (3.3) 12 30 7 (23.3) 2 (6.7) 14 30 6 (20) 0 (0) 16 30 13 (43.3) 2 (6.7) 18 30 5 (16.7) 0 (0) 20 30 9 (30) 2 (6.7) 22 30 8 (26.7) 1 (3.3) 24 30 9 (30) 2 (6.7) ATMs (364) Week 0 28 13 (46.4) 3 (10.7) 2 28 17 (60.7) 5 (17.9) 4 28 10 (35.7) 2 (7.1) 6 28 9 (32.1) 0 (0) 8 28 11 (39.3) 2 (7.1) 10 28 20 (71.4) 6 (21.4) 12 28 6 (21.4) 0 (0) 14 28 8 (28.6) 0 (0) 16 28 11 (39.3) 2 (7.1) 18 28 12 (42.9) 4 (14.3) 20 28 14 (50) 2 (7.1) 22 28 15 (53.6) 3 (10.7) 24 28 17 (60.7) 4 (14.3) n, no. of samples.
Page 5 of 7 TABLE 2 Antimicrobial resistance profiles of MRSA from vehicular gate passes and ATMs No. (%) of resistant meca-characterised isolates by source (n) Antimicrobials Disk content (µg) Gate Pass (17) ATM (33) Ampicillin (AMP) 10 17 (100) 33 (100) Ceftriaxone (CEF) 30 17 (100) 33 (100) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5 14 (82.6) 33 (100) Erythromycin (ERY) 30 13 (76.5) 8 (24.2) Gentamicin (GEN) 10 1 (5.9) 3 (9.1) Oxacillin (OXA) 1 17 (100) 33 (100) Penicillin G (PEN) 10 17 (100) 33 (100) Rifampin (RIF) 5 0 (0) 0 (0) Streptomycin (STR) 10 0 (0) 1 (3) Tetracycline (TET) 30 0 (0) 5 (15.2) n, no. of isolates tested. Therefore, the overall prevalences of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were 4.4 % on gate passes and 9.1 % on ATMs within the specified period of time. Also, there is a 76.9 % incidence of MRSA within the specified period (i.e. 24 weeks) for both samples. 4. Discussion This is the first reported study on the prevalence and characterisation of non-health care environmental MRSA isolates from the mentioned samples in the region of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. Although MRSA reservoirs have been implicated in hospital settings, such as bodily fluids, blood pressure cuffs, tables, monitor cuffs, bed and countertop linens, tables and bed railings [11,12], they were also isolated from the frequently touched/handled public subjects [13,14]. Admittance gate passes and cash machines have global usage for security and the conduct of teeming financial procedures respectively, but can be vehicles for the transmission of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA as seen from this research, whose findings are consistent with similar works on rather food samples [6,8]. With an overall 9.1% prevalence, these surfaces may serve as reservoirs of MRSA, and even other significant commonly shared public objects. Also, some MRSA isolates recorded partial resistance to erythromycin, gentamicin, streptomycin and tetracycline. Similar resistance has been recorded, though, from clinical samples [15]. These antimicrobials are still strongly recommended for use and drug of choice in this region against infections implicating S. aureus. Hand-borne transmission via these subjects can potentially be one of the important routes for many infectious agents, ranging from bacteria to fungi and viruses to spread within a community and can result to the endemicity of a particular disease within a community. Hence, there is need to understand the possible transmission ways of pathogens among the healthy individuals especially within a community of young student adults in developing national settings, which can result in peculiar interest in shared items
Page 6 of 7 and frequently-handled objects. This can be critical issues of public health policymaking within the community. In this study, contamination of MRSA on the surfaces of gate passes and ATMs was evidenced, which can facilitate the surface-to-hand, hand-to-surface, and hand-to-hand transmission of MRSA infection. Also, this study drags into the issue of antibiotic resistance as the MRSA isolates showed fairly extensive resistance to the antimicrobials used. Therefore, it is important that these public objects, and even other objects used by the public for that matter, be regularly, adequately and properly sanitized. The misuse and overuse of antibiotics has to be strongly discouraged especially through more efforts in awareness. 5. Conclusion A combination of growth and physiological characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of characteristic resistant meca gene proved useful for the detecting MRSA, although the detection of meca in PCR was more sensitive, reliable and specific than the non-pcr means utilized. Plastic gate passes and automated teller machines dotted within the university campus have proven to be possible source of MRSA infection within the university community. As a consequence, hygiene among users of these public objects especially during handling is strongly recommended as complete surface sanitation and hand hygiene are critically important. Also the level of antibiotic resistance recorded among MRSA isolates could be attributed to antibiotic overuse and misuse. Hence, antibiotic misuse and overuse should be discouraged and more awareness about the global fight against overreaching antibiotic resistance must be made especially in developing countries. 6. Authors Contribution ODK and ONC particularly designed the study, collated the samples and penned down the results and discussion. OCB and UND conducted sampling and gathered research literature. However, all authors (ODK, ONC, OCB and UND) equally participated in the laboratory work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. 7. References 1. Archer GL. Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1998, 26:1179-1181 2. Pu S, Han F, Ge B. Isolation and Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Louisiana Retail Meats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009, 75(1): 265-267 3. Jackson CR, Davis JA, Barrett JB. Prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retail meat and humans in Georgia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013, 51(4): 1199-1207
Page 7 of 7 4. Kassem II, Sigler V, Esseili MA. 2007. Public computer surfaces are reservoirs for methicillin-resistant staphylococci. The ISME Journal: Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology. 2007, 1.3: 265-68 5. Khan RA, Rahman AU, Ahmad A, Jaseem M, Jabbar A, Khan SA, et al. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility profile of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from different clinical samples in district Peshawar. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. 2014, 4(8S): 40-46 6. Kennedy AD, Otto M, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Chen L, Mathema B, et al. Epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: recent clonal expansion and diversification. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105:1327-1332 7. Kwon N, Park K, Jung W, Youn HY, Lee Y, Kim SH, Bae W, Lim JY, Kim JY, Kim JM, Hong SK, Park YH. Characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken meat and hospitalized dogs in Korea and their epidemiological relatedness. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006, 117: 304-312 8. Razieh A, Abdulamir AS, Fatemeh J, Lee CS, Ali H, Yasaman A, et al. 2012. Isolation and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from students coins. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012, 11(50): 11143-11149 9. National Food Institute. Multiplex PCR for the detection of the meca gene and the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. FDU Food, Denmark. 2009, 1-14 10. Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, Borchardt SM, Boxrud DJ, Etienne J, et al. Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA. 2003, 290:2976-2984 11. Nozaki C, Masaki T, Kim, SJ, Cruz RS, Bermido CM, Kim K, et al. Comparative prevalence of community-acquired-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) among students of Centro Escolar University (Philippines), Kumamoto Health Science University (Japan) and Daegu Health College (Korea). Biomedical Research. 2015, 26 (2): 259-265 12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 21st informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2011. 13. Tekerekoğlu MS, Yakupogullari Y, Otlu B, Duman Y, Gucluer N. Bacteria found on banks automated teller machines (ATMs). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2013, 7(16): 1619-14. Kennedy AD, Otto M, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Chen L, Mathema B, et al. Epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: recent clonal expansion and diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105:1327-1332 15. Taj Y, Abdullah FE, Kazmi SU. Current pattern of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates and the emergence of vancomycin resistance. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2010, 20(11): 728-732